View the PDF version Google Docs PDF Viewer
CITY OF MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 2004 CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS@ 5:30 P.M. AGENDA o CALL TO ORDER: o PRAYER: o PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: o ROLL CALL: o HONORS AND AWARDS: o INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATION o CONSENT AGENDA: a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK b. Policy Regarding Conflict of Interest and Service Pledge. CITY CLERK c. FIRST READING: Amend Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances Adopting the 2003 International Fire Code. INSPECTION SERVICES/FIRE d. Consumers Energy Easement. LEISURE SERVICES e. Janitorial Services. Option Year (2004-2005). ENGINEERING f. Traffic Department Materials and Services 2004. PUBLIC WORKS g. Write-off of Uncollectible Accounts Receivable. CITY TREASURER o PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Request for the Establishment of an Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling Systems. Inc. PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT b. DNR Grant Application Re-submittal. LEISURE SERVICES c. Create Special Assessment District for Beidler Street. Laketon to Southern Avenue. ENGINEERING d. Create Special Assessment District for McCracken Street. Sherman Blvd to Lakeshore Drive. ENGINEERING e. Create Special Assessment District for Sherman Blvd .• Lincoln Street to Beach Street. ENGINEERING □ COMMUNICATIONS: □ CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: □ UNFINISHED BUSINESS: a. SECOND READING: Rezoning Request for Property Located at 407 Marquette Aveneu {SE Corner of Marquette Avenue and Wood Street). PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT □ NEW BUSINESS: a. City - MDOT Agreement for Sherman Blvd., Lincoln to Beach. ENGINEERING b. Milwaukee Clipper Request. LEISURE SERVICES c. Mall Study Committee Final Report. PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT d. Agreement with the DMDC. CITY MANAGER e. Final Amendments to 2003 Budget. FINANCE f. Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvements Project. WATER FILTRATION g. Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Nofice and Order to Demolish the Following: INSPECTION SERVICES 1. 1263 W. Larch 2. 153 Houston - Area 10 3. 1867 Austin 4. 1947 S. Getty 5. 448 Catherine -Area 11 6. 1345 Fifth - Garage Only - Area l 0 7. 1986 Ninth - Garage Only □ ANY OTHER BUSINESS: o PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: ► Reminder: Individuals who would like to address the City Commission shall do the following; ► Fill out CJ request to speak form ottached to the agenda or located in the back of the room. ► Submit !he form to the City Clerk. ► Be recognized by the Chair. ► Step forward to the microphone. ► State name and address. ► limit of 3 minutes to address the Commission. ► (Speaker representing a group moy be allowed 10 minutes if previously registered with City Clerk.) o ADJOURNMENT: ADA POLICY: THE CITY OF MUSKEGON WILL PROVIDE NECESSARY AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS WHO WANT TO ATTEND THE MEETING UPON TWENTY FOUR HOUR NOTICE TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGON. PLEASE CONTACT GAIL A. KUNDINGER, CITY CLERK, 933 TERRACE STREET, MUSKEGON, Ml 49440 OR BY CALLING (231) 724-6705 OR TDD: (231) 724-4172. Date: February 10, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk RE: Approval of Minutes SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the minutes of the Special Commission Meeting that was held on Wednesday, January 21, 2004; and the Regular Commission Meeting that was held on Tuesday, January 27, 2004. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the minutes. CITY OF MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 2004 CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS@ 5:30 P.M. MINUTES The Regular Commission Meeting of the City of Muskegon was held at City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan at 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, February 10, 2004. Mayor Warmington opened the meeting with a prayer from Pastor Sarah Johnson of the Word of Truth Outreach after which the Commission and Public recited the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL FOR THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING: Present: Mayor Stephen Warmington, Vice Mayor Bill Larson, Commissioners Chris Carter, Kevin Davis, Stephen Gawron, Clara Shepherd, and Lawrence Spataro, City Manager Bryon Mazade, City Attorney John Schrier and City Clerk Gail Kundinger. 2004- 17 CONSENT AGENDA: a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the minutes of the Special Commission Meeting that was held on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 and the Regular Commission Meeting that was held on Tuesday, January 27, 2004. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the minutes. b. Policy Regarding Conflict of Interest and Service Pledge. CITY CLERK SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt a resolution that requires all appointed members of the various City boards and committees to sign a Conflict of Interest form and a Service Pledge form. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: approval COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Legislative Policy Committee met on January 28, 2004 and recommends approval. c. FIRST READING: Amend Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances Adopting the 2003 International Fire Code. INSPECTION SERVICES/FIRE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: .This is to request City Commission adopt the ordinance amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances. This request is made to adopt the 2003 International Fire Code and retain appendix 11-C of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code. The request to adopt the 2003 edition is made to put the Fire Code in line with the current editions of the construction codes as adopted by the State of Michigan. Retainage of the appendix 11-C will allow some code enforcement for fire safety on marina docks. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. All code books were budgeted for in anticipation of this change. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the ordinance as written. d. Consumers Energy Easement. LEISURE SERVICES SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Consumers Energy is requesting an easement across the bike trail property at Edison Landing to Service the CSX railroad crossing. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve e. Janitorial Services, Option Year (2004-2005). ENGINEERING SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Exercise the "option year" in the City's 2001-2003 contract with Edwards Janitorial to clean City Hall and the Public Service Building for an additional monthly charge of $151.62 for City Hall and $50.79 for DPW. The total annual cost for this option year is $56,520 for City hall, which is $367.85 more than what was submitted as part of the bids for option year back in February of 2001. Similarly, the proposed annual DPW charges are $17,400 which is $121.35 more than 2001 bids for an option year. These extra charges are being requested by Edwards due to a significant increase in his workman compensation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total cost of the contract which is $73,920. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. The option year cost was anticipated during the budget time and the extras are minor. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the extension of the contract with Edwards Janitorial to provide cleaning services until the end of April of 2005. f. Traffic Department Materials and Services 2004. PUBLIC WORKS SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Contract with the Muskegon County Road Commission for the joint purchase of various Traffic Department materials and services. We have bid out these items with MCRC for the past fourteen years. By bidding together with MCRC and other municipalities we are able to get better unit prices because of larger quantity purchases. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Sign materials and services to be jointly bid: Sign blanks .............................................. .$1,500.00 approx. Sign posts ................................................ .$4,800.00 approx. Sign sheeting ...........................................$1,500.00 approx. Ready made signs .................................. $2,000.00 approx. Centerline painting .............................. $12,000.00 approx. Total $21,800.00 ($21,2000.00 in 2003) BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. This item is requested each year in the appropriate Highway budgets. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the continued joint purchasing with the Muskegon County Road Commission for sign materials and services. g. Write-off of Uncollectible Accounts Receivable. CITY TREASURER SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Periodically, it is necessary to purge from the City's general accounts receivable records items that are deemed uncollectible. In most cases these items have gone through the entire collection process without success. In some other cases, further collection efforts, such as using the outside collection agency, resulted in limited success. However, at this time, it is requested that the City Commisison authorize staff to write-off these receivables from the City's books. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Reduce the City's accounts receivable by $16,304.90. The impact would be a decrease in the fund balance/retained earnings of several City funds as follows. 101 General Fund $ 7,068.87 472 CDBG Fund 5,681.30 590 & 591 Sewer Fund & Water Fund 3,554.73 Total $16.304.90 BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: For the General, Sewer and Water Funds, there are sufficient funds for bad debt expense included in the 2003 budget, so no further action is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the 2003 write-offs effective for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 for the various funds as shown above. Motion by Commissioner Gawron, second by Commissioner Spataro to approve the Consent Agenda as read. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington Nays: None MOTION PASSES 2004-18 PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Request for the Establishment of an Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling Systems. Inc. PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Pursuant to Public Act 198 of 1974 as amended, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan, has requested the establishment of an Industrial Development District for property located at 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the resolution establishing the Industrial Development District for Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. The Public Hearing opened at 5:39pm to hear comments from the public. There were no comments heard at this time. Motion by Commissioner Gawron, second by Commissioner Carter to close the Public Hearing at 5:41 pm and to approve the resolution establishing the Industrial Development District for Streamline Tooling Systems. Inc. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter Nays: None MOTION PASSES b. DNR Grant Application Re-submittal. LEISURE SERVICES SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To authorize staff to re-submit grant applications to the DNR Trust Fund for the purchase of the Consumers Energy Property and to construct Phase I of the Lakeshore Trail. We have applied for these grants each of the last two years. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consumers Energy Purchase - None Lakeshore Trail Construction - $425,000 BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve The Public Hearing opened at 5:42pm to hear comments from the public. There were no comments heard at this time. Motion by Commissioner Larson, second by Commissioner Davis to close the Public Hearing at 5:46pm to authorize staff to re-submit applications to the DNR Trust Fund for the purchase of the Consumers Energy Property and to construct Phase 1 of the Lakeshore Trail. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis Nays: None MOTION PASSES c. Create Special Assessment District for Beidler Street. Laketon to Southern Avenue. ENGINEERING SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of Beidler St., Laketon to Southern Ave., and to create the special assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution. The Public Hearing opened at 5:47pm to hear comments from the public. Comments in opposition were heard by David Wotli of 1724 Beidler. Dale Sisson of 1607 Beidler, Debbie Anderson of 1730 Beidler and Marion Olearchek from the Nelson Community Association at 1608 Beidler. Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Gawron to close the Public Hearing at 6:03pm and to approve the special assessment district of Beidler St., Laketon to Southern Ave., and assign two Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Gawron Nays: Larson, Shepherd, Warmington, Carter, Davis MOTION FAILS d. Create Special Assessment District for McCracken Street. Sherman Blvd to Lakeshore Drive. ENGINEERING SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of McCracken St., Sherman Blvd. To Lakeshore Drive., and to create the special assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution. The Public Hearing opened at 6:08pm to hear comments from the public. Comments in opposition were heard from Dan and Julie Jolman of 2075 Miner and 2223 McCracken, Walter White of 2326 Greenwood, Dave Flickema of 2493 McCracken, Rosemary Kowalski of 2101 Moon and 2272 McCracken, Paul Kurdziel of 2319 Greenwood, Norm Cunningham of 3151 Beach who represented Steve Holdeman of 2011 Letart and Mrs. Hansen. In favor was Ray Theile of 2465 McCracken. Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Vice Mayor Larson to close the Public Hearing at 6:46pm and to approve the special assessment district of McCracken St., Sherman Blvd. To Lakeshore Dr. and to assign Vice Mayor Larson and Commissioner Davis to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Larson, Gawron Nays: None MOTION PASSES e. Create Special Assessment District for Sherman Blvd .• Lincoln Street to Beach Street. ENGINEERING SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of Sherman Blvd., Lincoln Street to Beach St., and to create the special assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution. The Public Hearing opened at 6:51 pm to hear comments from the public. Comments in opposition were heard from Wendell Hallman of 2500 Sherman, Chad Murphy of 2596 Sherman, Jim Harker of 2432 Sherman and Jim Shields of 2586 Fountain who also read a letter from Melvin Onstott of 2442 Sherman who was also in opposition. Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second Vice Mayor Larson to close the Public Hearing at 7:22pm and approve the special assessment district of Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St. and appoint Vice Mayor Larson and Commissioner Davis to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd Nays: None MOTION PASSES 2004-19 UNFINISHED BUSINESS: a. SECOND READING: Rezoning Request for Property Located at 407 Marquette Avenue (SE Corner of Marquette Avenue and Wood Street). PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request to rezone property located at 407 Marquette Ave., at the SE corner of Marquette Ave. and Wood St., from R-1, Single-Family Residential to B-1, Limited Business. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the request due to lack of compliance with the future land use map and Master Land Use Plan. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted to deny the request at their 1/15 meeting. Spataro, Aslakson, Johnson and Sartorius voted for denial, Michalski and Smith voted against denial, and Mazade and Warmington abstained. T. Harryman was absent. Motion by Vice Mayor Larson, second by Commissioner Davis to approve the rezoning of 407 Marquette Ave, from R-1 Single-Family Residential to B-1, Limited Business. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Davis, Larson Nays: Warmington, Carter, Gawron, Shepherd, Spataro MOTION FAILS 2004-20 NEW BUSINESS: a. City - MDOT Agreement for Sherman Blvd., Lincoln to Beach. ENGINEERING SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the contract with MDOT for the reconstruction of Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln to Beach Street and to approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract. FINANCIAL IMPACT: MDOT's participation is estimated at $355,830 but not to exceed 81.85% of eligible cost. The estimated total cost of the project, including the none participating items of engineering and watermain, is $550,000. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. The City's share of the cost will come out of the Major Street and Water Funds as was budgeted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the agreement and resolution be approved. Motion by Vice Mayor Larson, second by Commissioner Gawron to approve the contract with MDOT for the reconstruction of Sherman Blvd., from Lincoln to Beach St. and to approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington Nays: None MOTION PASSES b. Mall Study Committee Final Report. PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Study Committee, which was appointed by the City Commission on April 22, 2003 to study the historic significance of the mall structures has developed a final report. The five buildings researched are commonly known as the Russell Block (Daniels), Century Club, Muskegon Savings Bank, Montgomery Block (National City Bank), and the Hackley Bank Building (Comerica). To finalize its duties, the Study Committee is forwarding on the final report with a recommendation to the City Commission. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To accept the Study Committee report and recommendation. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Study Committee recommended to the City Commission that the compromise of placing the demolition permits for the four buildings in question be placed in escrow so they cannot be demolished until we have final site plans and the closing on the property. Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Gawron to accept the Mall Study Committee report and recommendation ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter Nays: None MOTION PASSES c. Agreement with the DMDC. CITY MANAGER SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve an agreement with the DMDC regarding the demolition of the buildings with the former Muskegon Mall. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the agreement. Motion by Commissioner Carter, second by Commissioner Davis to approve an agreement with the Downtown Muskegon Development Corporation regarding the demolition of the buildings associated with the former Muskegon Mall. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis Nays: None MOTION PASSES d. Final Amendments to 2003 Budget. FINANCE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Adoption of the year-end amendments to the City's 2003 Budget to assure compliance with the State Uniform Budget Act. This act requires that budgets for "governmental-type" funds (i.e. general fund and special revenue funds) be amended so that expenditures are not reported in the City's audit as exceeding legal appropriations. FINANCIAL IMPACT: These budget amendments establish the final 2003 authorized revenue estimates and spending limits for the various City Departments and funds. The schedule shows how the amended budget varies from the original budget (and subsequent budget reforecasts) previously approved by the City Commission. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: Self-explanatory STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Shepherd to approve the adoption of the year-end amendments to the City's 2003 Budget. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Gawron Nays: None Davis was out of the room. MOTION PASSES e. Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvements Project. WATER FILTRATION SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To enlist Muskegon Construction Company to perform the Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvement project at the Water Filtration Plant. FINANCIAL IMPACT: $256,800.00. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: The project cost will be funded with Drinking Water Revolving Loan Fund (DWRF) money. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend making a change to the Water Filtration Plant Improvements project contract with Muskegon Construction Company, to perform the Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvement project at an additional cost of $256,800.00. Motion by Commissioner Carter, second by Commissioner Spataro to make a change to the Water Filtration Plant Improvements project contract with Muskegon Construction to perform the Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvement project at an additional cost of $256,800.00. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson Nays: None MOTION PASSES f. Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to Demolish the Following: INSPECTION SERVICES SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request the City Commission concur with the Housing Board of Appeals that the structures located at the following addresses are unsafe, substandard, public nuisances and that they be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structures and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition at the lowest responsible bidder. 1. 1263 W. Larch CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #En-030173, 1263 W. Larch LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on W. Larch between Ruddiman and McGraft. It is owned by Deutsche Bank Trust in Texas. STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 11 /20/03. A Notice and Order to repair was issued on 12/3/03. On 1/8/04 the HBA declared the structure substandard and dangerous. OWNER CONTACT: On 1/13/04 a contact for the bank called the Inspection office and stated the home is in foreclosure and they cannot do anything until the redemption period is up, which is 6 months. He was faxed all copies of previous notices. FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $33,300 ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $8,000 plus the cost of interior repairs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. 2. 153 Houston St. CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN030052, 153 Houston, Muskegon, Ml LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on Houston between First and Jefferson and is owned by Ronald Wells. STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: This rental house began with a dangerous building inspection on the garage only on 5/29/03 and the residence was added on 10/07/03. An interior inspection was conducted on 10/22/03 and shortly after the house was listed for sale. Ronald Wells applied for a permit to repair the garage on 7/11 /03, which expired before any repairs were done. There is also a housing inspection report with 75 violations. OWNER CONTACT: There has been no contact since the interior inspection and the structure appears vacant now and for sale. FINANCIAL IMPACT: CDBG BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None ST ATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $20,100 ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $30,000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. 3. 1867 Austin CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN030172, 1867 Austin, Muskegon, Ml LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on Austin, between Laketon and Holbrook. It is owned by John Joseph. STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 11 /20/03. A Notice and Order to Repair was issued 12/2/03. On 1/8/04 Chris Davison appeared before the HBA and stated he was buying the property on a Land Contract from George Puthupppally, who is the same person as John Joseph. He was told if he intends to save the house he needs to bring in prove that he has a financial interest in the property and schedule an interior inspection. When asked about completing repairs, he stated he needs to wait until he gets an income tax refund to pay for any repairs. The HBA declared the house substandard on that date. OWNER CONTACT: On 2/2/04 Chris Davison called the Inspection office and tried to schedule an interior inspection. He was told we first need proof that he has a financial interest in the property and if he could bring in his paperwork today we can schedule an inspection to be conducted within a couple days. FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $15,300 ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $2,500 plus the cost of interior repairs STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. 4. 1947 S. Getty CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN030040, 1947 S. Getty, Muskegon, Ml LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This commercial structure is located on S. Getty between Laketon and Hackley and is owned by the State of Michigan. STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 5/29/03 and the Notice and Order to repair or remove was issued 6/13/03. On 8/7 /03 the HBA declared the structure dangerous and substandard. OWNER CONTACT: There has been no contact from the State. FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $75,700 - Commercial building and garage ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $8,000 Exterior only STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. 5. 1345 Fifth - Garage Only CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN-030042 Address: 1345 Fifth - Garage only LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on Fifth St., between Mason & Strong and is owned by Fannie Jones, Chicago Heights, Illinois. STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 5/9/03. A notice and Order to repair was issued 6/12/03. On 8/7/03 the HBA declared the garage substandard and dangerous. OWNER CONTACT: On 7/10/03 a relative of the owner came into the Inspection office and requested an extension on behalf of the owner who lives in Illinois. He stated the property is being sold. An extension was not granted. On 8/13/03 a potential buyer of the property came into the Inspection office and stated she would like to repair the garage after purchasing the property. There has been no contact since that date. FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $17,800 (house and garage) ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $1,500 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. 6. 1986 Ninth - Garage Only CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN-030094 Address: 1986 Ninth - Garage only LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on ninth Street between Delon and Young and is owned by David Ross. STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 4/16/03. A Notice and Order to repair was issued 5/12/03. Mr. Ross applied for a permit to demolish the garage on 6/11 /03, but never demolished it. On 11 /06/03 the HBA declared the garage substandard and dangerous. OWNER CONTACT: Mr. Ross came in the Inspection office to apply for a demolition permit. On 9/18/03 a letter was sent to him requesting him to contact the office again with his intentions. He did not reply. FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $15,500 (house and garage) ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $2,500 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. Motion by Commissioner Shepherd, second by Vice Mayor Larson to concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish 1263 W. Larch, 153 Houston, 1867 Austin, 1947 S. Getty, 1345 Fifth (Garage Only) and 1986 Ninth (Garage only); and direct staff to obtain bids for the demolition of the structures; and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolitions at the lowest responsible bidder. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd Nays: Davis MOTION PASSES 7. 448 Catherine CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN030029, 448 Catherine, Muskegon, Ml LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on Catherine between Williams and Wood St. It is owned by Curtis Vines who lives at 1868 Mcilwraith. STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 3/5/03 because the structure had been boarded and vacant for more than 180 days. A Notice and Order to repair was issued 3/5/03. An interior inspection was conducted with the owner on 4/18/03. On 7/3/03 the HBA tabled the case for 60 days to allow the owner time to have an electrical contractor pull a permit and complete the required repairs. Billy Walker Jr. applied for the electrical permit on 7/25/03 and called on 11/06/03 (date of HBA review) to schedule an inspection. The electrical inspector went to the property and found the electricity had been hooked up illegally. The HBA declared the structure on that date. OWNER CONTACT: Mr. Vines was in contact with Inspection Services to schedule an interior inspection and he stated he wanted to fix the house and live in it. He stated he would not be renting the structure out. There has been no contact since 11 /06/03. FINANCIAL IMPACT: CDBG Funds BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $20,200 ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $6,000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Shepherd to concur with the Housing Board of Appeals to demolish 448 Catherine and to authorize staff to obtain bids for the demolition and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition at the lowest responsible bidder. ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro Nays: None MOTION PASSES The Regular Commission meeting for the City of Muskegon was adjourned at 8:18pm. Respectfully submitted Gail Kundinger, City Clerk, MMC TO: Mayor and City Commission FROM: City Clerk DATE: January 29, 2004 RE: Policy regarding Conflict oflnterest and Service Pledge SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt a resolution that requires all appointed members of the various city boards and committees to sign a Conflict oflnterest Form and a Se1vice Pledge form. FINANCIAL IMP ACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Legislative Policy Committee met on January 28, 2004 and recommends approval. City of Muskegon Resolution # 2004-1 7 ( b) WHEREAS, The City Commission for the City of Muskegon recognizes the need for a policy regarding conflict of interest for all appointed members of the various city boards, committees and commissions; and WHEREAS, the public mission of the various boards, committees and commissions is that the members of the public have confidence in its management and administration; and WHEREAS, if a member of these various boards, committees and commissions will derive any financial profit or gain directly or indirectly by reason of membership on the board, committee or commission or through services provided to the organization, the objectivity or loyalty of that member could be questioned; and WHEREAS, the City Commission recognizes the importance and responsibility of those serving as members of the various boards, committees, and commissions an ask them to pledge to carry out in a trustworthy and diligent manner the duties and obligations in their roles. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Muskegon City Commission that a each member of all boards, committees and commission are hereby required to sign a Service Pledge and Conflict of Interest Form when they are appointed to the various boards, committees and commissions. These forms will be current for the appointed term of office for each member. wrence 0 . Spatar , Commissioner BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE SERVICE PLEDGE I, - - - - - - - - - - - ~ recognizing the important responsibility I am undertaking in serving as a member of t h e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ hereby pledge to carry out in a trustworthy and diligent manner the duties and obligations in my role as a ______________member. I will exercise the duties and responsibilities of this office with integrity, collegiality and care. I PLEDGE: 1. To establish as a high priority my attendance at all meetings of the board, committees and task forces on which I serve. 2. To come prepared to discuss the issues and business to be addressed at scheduled meetings, having read the agenda and all background material relevant to the topics at hand. 3. To work with and respect the opinions of my peers who serve on this board/committee, and to leave my personal prejudices out of all discussions. 4. To always act for the good of the organization. 5. To represent this organization in a positive and supportive manner at all times and in all places. 6. To observe the parliamentary procedures and display courteous conduct in all board, committee and task force meetings. 7. To refrain from intruding on administrative issues that are the responsibility of management, except to monitor the results and prohibit methods that conflict with board policy. 8. To avoid conflicts of interest between my position as a board member and my personal life. If such a conflict does arise, I will declare that conflict before the board and refrain from voting on matters in which I have a conflict. 9. To participate in 1) annual strategic planning, 2) a board/committee self- evaluation program, and 3) board development workshops, seminars and other educational events that enhance my skills as a board/commission/committee member. If for any reason, I find myself unable to carry out the above duties as best as I can, I agree to resign my position as a board/commission/committee member. Member Signature Date POLICY TITLE: Conflict of Interest The _______ Board/Committee/Commission requires that all members disclose interests that could result in a conflict. Because of the public mission of the board/committee/commission, it is important that members of the public have confidence in its management and administration. If a member of the Board/Committee/Commission will derive any financial profit or gain directly or indirectly by reason of membership on the Board/Committee/Commission or through services provided to the organization, the objectivity or loyalty of that member or employee could be questioned and a charge of self-dealing could be made because of the possible conflict of interest. In order to establish a procedure for dealing with the issue and to encourage disclosure, all Board/Committee/Commission members will be required to submit a disclosure statement at the beginning of employment or term. If a matter arises in which a member of the Board/Committee/Commission has a conflict of interest, the individual shall promptly disclose it to the Board/Committee/Commission. An individual with a conflict of interest shall not proceed to make any decision or take any action on behalf of the Board/Committee/Commission without approval of the Board/Committee/Commission. Disclosure Statement Regarding Conflict of Interest I have read and am fully familiar with the policy statement regarding Conflict of Interest adopted by the City Commission. I am not presently involved in any transaction, investment or other matter in which I would derive any financial profit or gain directly or indirectly as a result of my membership on the _ _ _ _Board/Committee/Commission except as follows: Furthermore, I agree to disclose any additional conflicts of interest, which may occur in accordance with the requirements of the policy statement. Signature ________________ Date _________ Adopted: _ _ _ __ DATE: January 30, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspections RE: Concurrence to Amend Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances Adopting the 2003 International Fire Code. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request City Commission adopt the attached ordinance amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances. This request is made to adopt the 2003 International Fire Code and retain appendix li- e of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code. The request to adopt the 2003 edition is made to put the fire code in line with the current editions of the construction codes as adopted by the State of Michigan. Retainage of the appendix 11-C will allow some code enforcement for fire safety on marina docks. Staff Recommendation: To adopt the ordinance as written. Fiscal Impact: None as all code books were budgeted for in anticipation of this change. CITY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Commission will consider this item at it's next meeting, Tuesday, February 10, 2004. City of Muskegon Muskegon County, Michigan ORDINANCE NO. ---2.l.2...3 The City Commission of the City of Muskegon hereby ORDAINS: Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Muskegon concerning the Fire Prevention Code is amended, as follows: 1. Section 30-91 shall be amended to read, as follows: Adoption. The city adopts for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire, hazardous materials or explosion, and for all other relevant purposes, that certain code known as the International Fire Code, 2003 edition, together with and retaining and readopting appendix II-C of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code. The adoption and retention of such codes is made except as amended by this article. Copies of such codes are on file with the city clerk and the codes, as amended, are made a part hereof as if fully set forth in this article. This ordinance adopted: Ayes: Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington Nays: None AdoptionDate: February 10, 2004 Effective Date: February 24, 2004 First Reading: February 10, 200 4 Second Reading: _ _ N _ /_ A _ _ __ __ _ __ CITY OF MUSKEGON By: ----1~ ~ & . . ~ ~ ~~~!,,,1('.~ ~ Gail A. Kundinger, MMC City Clerk C:\WINDOWSITEMP\Consent Agenda - Ordinance.doc CERTIFICATE The undersigned, being the duly qualified clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Michigan, does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of an ordinance adopted by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, at a regular meeting of the City Commission on the 10 th day of February , 2004, at which meeting a quorum was present and remained throughout, and that the original of said ordinance is on file in the records of the City of Muskegon. I further certify that the meeting was conducted, and public notice was given, pursuant to and in full compliance with Act No. 267, Public Acts of Michigan of 1976, as amended, and that minutes were kept and will be or have been made available as required thereby. DATED: February 1Q2004 Gail A. Kundinger, MMC Clerk, City of Muskegon Publish: Notice of Adoption to be published once within ten (10) days of final adoption. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Consent Agenda - Ordinance.doc CITY OF MUSKEGON NOTICE OF ADOPTION TO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED Please take notice that on February 10, 2004, the City Commission of the City of Muskegon adopted amendments to the Muskegon City Code concerning the Fire Prevention Code, summarized as follows: I. Section 30-91 shall be amended to authorize enforcement of the International Fie Code, 2003 edition. Copies of the ordinance may be viewed and purchased at reasonable cost at the Office of the City Clerk in the City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, during regular business hours. This ordinance amendment is effective ten (I 0) days from the date of this publication. CITY OF MUSKEGON Published February 14 2004 By_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Gail A. Kundinger, MMC, Its Clerk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLISH ONCE WITHIN TEN (I 0) DAYS OF FINAL PAS SAGE. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\ConsentAgenda - Ordinance.doc Date: 2/3/2004 To: Honorable ~a.; yrornd City Commissioners From: Ric Scott J!fl-. RE: Consumers Energy Easement SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Consumers Energy is requesting an easement across the bike trial property at Edison Landing to service the CSX railroad crossing. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Affirmative Action (231)724-6703 FAX: (231)722-1214 ~Wi·H:i:f-)UJi"lirntion FAX: (231)726-5 181 g•rNI.?6~31,.. 1111en1 FAX: (231)726-56 17 City Manager (231\724-6724 l'AX: (231)722-1214 C ivil Service r23n124-61 16 FAX: (23 1)724-4405 Date.• 2/3/2004 To: Honorable d City Commis sioners Clerk 23 1)724-6705 1'AX: (23 1)724-4178 From: Ric Scott Re: Consumers Energy Easement Consume rs Energy is r eque sting an easement across the bike t rail at Edison Landing to service the CSCX Computer Info. railroad c r ossi ng at that location. ,2~m~~'!6744 FAX: (231)722-4301 Staff would recommend appr oval of the request. fi~1\~1':/tfb1/'J'I. Thank you f or your consideration. FAX: (231)727-6904 r1irsis.ii;m FAX: (23 1)724-6985 Income Tax (231)724-6770 FAX: (23 1)724-6768 'mi'fl~~if1"srviccs l'AX: (23 1)728-4371 Leisure Services (231)724-6704 FAX: (231)724-1196 Treasurer's Office 231)724-6720 1'AX: (231)724-6768 n'J/ffz~'.~~l\ De1it. FAX: (231)724-6768 Weter Filtrntion (231)724-4106 FAX: (23 1)755-5290 City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, Ml 49443-0536 www.shorelinecity.com EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE Form 468 4-2003 Tax Code: 616029 2004-17(d) W .0. #05833462 640 Terrace Parties: "Owner" is the City of Muskegon. a Michigan public authority and body corporate Owner's address is 933 Terrace Street. Muskegon. Ml 49443-0536 "Consumers" is CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, a Michigan corporation. Consumers' address is One Energy Plaza, Jackson, Michigan 49201. Grant of Easement: For good and valuable consideration, Owner grants Consumers a permanent easement for underground electric line in, on, under, and across a portion of "Owner's Land," called the "Easement Area." Owner's Land is in the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, and State of Michigan and is described in the attached Exhibit A. The Easement Area is within Owner's Land and is described in the attached Exhibit B. Purpose: The purpose of the easement is to grant Consumers the right to enter Owner's Land to construct, operate, inspect, maintain, replace, improve, remove, and enlarge an underground electric line in the Easement Area. The underground electric lines may consist of underground cables (including fiber-optic cable), conduits, wires, conductors, subsurface junction vaults, surface-mounted transformers and enclosures, and other equipment for transmitting and distributing electrical energy and communications signals. Trees and Other Vegetation: Consumers shall have the right from time to time hereafter to enter Owner's Land to trim, cut down, and otherwise remove and control any trees, brush, roots, and other vegetation, whether inside or outside the Easement Area, that Consumers believes may interfere with the construction, operation, and maintenance of the underground electric line or lateral lines. Buildings/Structures: Owner shall not: 1) locate any buildings, structures, septic systems, drain fields, ponds, or swimming pools within the Easement Area, 2) plant any trees within the Easement Area, or 3) change the ground elevation within the Easement Area. If Owner violates this provision, Owner shall reimburse Consumers for any expenses Consumers incurs correcting the violation. If Consumers corrects the violation by relocating the electric line or lateral line on Owner's Land, this easement shall automatically apply to such relocated line. Exercise of Easement: Grantee's nonuse or limited use of this Easement shall not preclude Grantee's later use of this Easement to its full extent. Successors: This easement shall bind and benefit Owner's and Consumers' respective heirs, successors, lessees, licensees, and assigns. Date: __F_e_b_r_u_a_r..._y_l-'-0......,___;;c2_;:0_;:0_4_ _ __ Owner: City of Muskegon, a Michigan public autho i an body corporate Acknowledgment The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me in Muskegon County, Michigan, on fe-6 r1A.C?t;;L!/, J19o Y by Stepen J . Warmington, Mayor of City of Muskegon, a Michigan pub(ic authority and body corporate L :n&o. s. l'o tt f'r Notary Public f(lus /(e.JL o r- County, Michigan V Acting in --l-m '-'--'-....u...,,,s,__,k, _,___,b_..O , ""-"'. QL-C?- '----- County My Commission expires: _ _.._ 7_-...:::o? ._s- o......fz"---_ _ - -"- This easement is exempt from real estate transfer tax pursuant to MCLA 207.505(f) and from State real estate transfer tax pursuant to the provisions of MCLA 207.526(f). Prepared By: Alan Poling Consumers Energy Company 4000 Clay Avenue SW, P.O. Box 201 Grand Rapids, Ml 49502-0494 Form 468 4-2003 EXHIBIT A Owner's Land A 15.0 foot wide right of way for pedestrian usage the center line of which is described as: Commence at the intersection of the Northeasterly line of Terrace Street, being the Southwesterly line of Block 557 extended to the centerline of vacated Water Street; thence North 62°44'00" West 381.45 feet along the northeasterly right of way line of Terrace Street; thence Westerly 269.86 feet, along said northeasterly right of way line, said line being a 302.48 foot radius curve to the left with a central angle of 51 °07'00" and a chord which bears North 88°17'30" West 261.00 feet, to the line between Lots 5 and 6 of said Block 558; thence North 46°09'15" West 78.34 feet, along said line, to the PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION: Thence Northeasterly 628.75 feet, along a 795.75 foot radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 45°16'17" and a chord which bears North 70°05'06" East 612.52 feet; thence South 87°16'46" East 1246.74 feet; thence Northeasterly 1510.50 feet, along a 1279.84 foot radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 67°37'19" and a chord which bears North 58°54'34" East 1424.34 feet to the place of ending of this center line description. The northerly line of said easement is to be shortened or lengthened to intersect the line between Lots 5 and 6 of said Block 558; and the southerly line is to be shortened or lengthened to intersect the line between Lots 5 and 6 of said Block 558 and the westerly right of way line of Western Avenue. EXHIBIT B Easement Area A 10 foot-wide strip of land, as shown in the attached drawing, being 5 feet on each side of each underground electric line, as constructed on Owner's Land. Form 468 4·2003 ljJ I ') WO# 05833452 lvl[ JC:/< l~ .• C (-.[)~I '-<) ..7 .• I \. ('""\ Ii _,~./ ~32J C IT Y OF MUS f'. EGOfJ LJ.J T I O R 1 G SEC, I 9 u <[ cc. o- LLI r- ~ ?i:; ,__ ,.,! I 1 f-::1 _18 1 - • 1-" ·:- BIKEPATH 15' ROW -1---1 '7' . -----------,7"-'fofl..,·'I""-<;_--- ! \ ' / \ CSX RR 50' ROW rr, \ ----------- !' \ CSX --\ METER SOCKET I 1 'f:10 EA.SEME~IT SHORELif\lE Fenn 468 4-2003 Date: February 1 O, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Engineering RE: Janitorial Services, Option Year (2004-2005) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Exercise the "option year" in the City's 2001-2003 contract with Edwards Janitorial to clean City Hall and Public Service Building for an additional monthly charges of $151.62 for City Hall and $50.79 for DPW. The total annual cost for this option year is $56,520 for City Hall, which is $367.85 more than what was submitted as part of the bids for option year back in February of 2001. Similarly, the proposed annual DPW charges are $17,400 which is $121.35 more than 2001 bids for an option year. Those extra charges are being requested by Edwards, see attached letter, due to a significant increase in his workman compensation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total cost of the contract which $73,920 BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None, the option year cost was anticipated during the budget time and the extras are minor. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the extension of the contract with Edwards Janitorial to provide cleaning services until the end of April of 2005. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: RECEIVED City of Muskegon CITY OF MUSKEGON Attn: Mr. Mohammed Al-Shatel, P.E. JAN 3 0 2004 933 Terrace St. P.O. Box536 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Muskegon, Michigan 49443-0536 1/26/04 Dear Sir: This year we have received a significant increase in our workmens compensation insurance ( total of$ 3,382.00 per year). In addition in order to keep the increase at this level we were required to initiate drug testing and physicals for all new hires. The cost of this will be a minimum of close to $ 1,000.00 each year. After much pricing both by my insurance agents and myself we still found that our insurance supplier was very competitive. I am asking that all of my customers help defray these costs. For the City of Muskegon this amounts to$ 489.00 per year. If this is agreeable this would be effective 5/01/04 which starts the fourth year optional contract. Our pricing would be $ 4710 per month for the City Hall and $ 1450 per month( plus extra add ons) for the Public Service Building. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Any questions feel free to call me. ( 231) 744-3569. Edwards JanitoriaJ Servt9e ;D~l.tEM~ David L. Edwards Agenda Item No. _ _ __ City Commission Meeting _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: January 22,2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission From: Department of Public Works Re: Traffic Department materials and services 2004 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Contract with the Muskegon County Road Commission for the joint purchase of various Traffic Department materials and services. We have bid out these items with MCRC for the past fomieen years. By bidding together with MCRC and other municipalities we are able to get better unit prices because oflarger quantity purchases. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Sign materials and services to be jointly bid: Sign blanks ............................................... $1,500.00 approx. Sign posts ................................................ $4,800.00 approx. Sign sheeting ............................................. $1,500.00 approx. Ready Made Signs ....................................... $2,000.00 approx. Centerline painting .................................... $12,000.00 approx. Total $21,800.00 ($21,200.00 in 2003) BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None, this item is requested each year in the appropriate Highway budgets. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the continued joint purchasing with the Muskegon County Road Commission for sign materials and services. City of Muskegon Traffic Department Memo To: Bob Kuhn From: Dan Gomez Date: 01-22-04 Re: Sign Materials & Services: Annual Contract Again this year we are requesting permission to bid jointly for our sign materials and services with the Muskegon County Road Commission as we have done the last fourteen years. They are getting ready to go out for bids on the following items and thus we do not have any actual quotes for 2004. For sign blanks: 2000 2001 2002 2003 sign blanks • $1.50/sq. ft. $1.47/sq. ft. $1.40/sq. ft. $1.34/sq ft For sign posts: 2000 2001 2002 2003 2#x 11' posts • $5.45/ea. $5.76/ea. $6.15/ea. $6.08 3# x 12' posts • . $8.92/ea. $9.42/ea. $10.08/ea . $9.96 For sheeting: Our standard has always been 3M sheeting, they are the only bid usually received by MCRC, they like us, use 3M sheeting exclusively, however we recently purchased our 3M roller, as did MCRC, and no longer have to buy a mimimum order to keep the roller they originally gave to us to maintain the warranty on their sheeting. Other competitive sources are also bidded out . Centerline painting: Before 1997, we contracted with the MCRC for this work. In 1997 they sold their equipment and we jointly bid with all other cities and townships in the County. In 1997 M&M Pavement Marking, Inc. was awarded the bid and has since been extended the contract every year since at the same unit prices. Our overall cost since 1998 has been higher because we painted over significant amounts of faded permanent pavement marking and painting costs have increased. $10,082 (M&M) $10,060 (M&M) $11,228 (M&M) $10,737(M&M) • Page 1 Date: February 3, 2004 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: City Treasurer RE: Write-off of Uncollectible Accounts Receivable SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Periodically it is necessary to purge from the City's general accounts receivable records items that are deemed uncollectible. In most cases these items have gone through the entire collection process without success. In some other cases, further collections efforts, such as using the outside collection agency, resulted in limite:l success. However, at this time, it is requested that the City Comnission authorize staff to write-off these receivables from the City's books. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Reduce the City's accounts receivable by $16,304.90. The impact would be a decrease in the fund balance/retained earnings of several City funds as follows: 101 General Fund $ 7,068.87 472 CDBG Fund 5,681.30 590 & 591 Sewer Fund & Water Fund 3,554.73 Total $16,304.90 BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: For the General, Sewer and Water Funds, theie are sufficient funds for bad debt expense included in the 2003 budget, so no further action is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the 2003 write-offs effective for the fi&:al year ended December 31, 2003 for the various funds as shown above. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION N/A 1 City of Muskegon Invoices Submitted For Write Off-2003 Fiscal Year Invoice No. Date of Service/Invoice Invoiced To Reason for Write Off Amount 9818343 2/16/01 JILLIAN RUCKER CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 50.00 9818931 4/13/01 JILLIAN RUCKER CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 126.00 9827508 10/18/02 JASON DAVID JANCZYK CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 50.00 9822888 12/21/01 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 70.00 9823162 12/31/01 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 119.30 9824180 4/26/02 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 90.00 9827234 10/4/02 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 55.00 9826732 9/13/02 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 335.46 9827745 11/1/02 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 126.00 9818650 3/16/01 ROBERT FRANK RUDNICK II CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 50.00 9825432 7/12/02 JOHN L ANDERSON JR TAX FORECLOSURE $ 122.00 9825002 6/14/02 JEFFERY M. JANUSKA TAX FORECLOSURE $ 40.00 9825591 7/19/02 JEFFERY M. JANUSKA TAX FORECLOSURE $ 60.00 9824557 5/24/02 HERBERT RUSS TAX FORECLOSURE $ 171.25 9825225 7/5/02 HERBERT RUSS TAX FORECLOSURE $ 122.00 9825982 7/26/02 HERBERT RUSS TAX FORECLOSURE $ 92.00 9826938 9/20/02 HERBERT RUSS TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00 9818400 2/16/01 VIVIAN/CIRILA L. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 75.00 9819025 4/20/01 VIVIAN/CIRILA L. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 70.00 9819132 4/27/01 VIVIAN/CIRILA L. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 106.11 9819419 5/25/01 VIVIAN/CIRILA L. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 45.00 9820106 6/29/01 VIVIAN/Cl RI LAL. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 45.00 9817195 10/13/00 MICHAELJONATHON KLINE UNABLE TO LOCATE - UNCOLLECTABLE $ 50.00 9825481 7/19/02 JOSEPH LYMAN BATILE DECEASED $ 50.00 9830588 6/27/03 ROGER BALCOM TAX FORECLOSURE $ 122.00 9829999 5/30/03 ERIK J. GARVEY DECEASED $ 75.00 9819708 6/15/01 CARRIE WILLIAMS DECEASED $ 122.00 9822047 10/12/01 CARRIE WILLIAMS DECEASED $ 104.00 9824084 4/12/02 CARRIE WILLIAMS DECEASED $ 211.57 9825082 6/28/02 CARRIE WILLIAMS DECEASED $ 29.33 9821527 9/14/01 TAWANA LETRECE MCQUARTER CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 50.00 9827644 8/20/80 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 86.00 9809854 4/23/99 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 99.82 9816954 10/6/00 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 30.00 9817476 11/10/00 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 30.00 9820485 7/20/01 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 30.00 9821224 8/31/01 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 30.00 Page 1 of3 City of Muskegon Invoices Submitted For Write Off - 2003 Fiscal Year Invoice No. Date of Service/Invoice Invoiced To Reason for Write Off Amount 9822261 10/26/01 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 60.00 9825093 6/28/02 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 132.43 9806141 7/31/98 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 104.00 9809840 4/23/99 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 98.64 9810666 6/25/99 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 104.00 9811674 8/27/99 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 86.00 9812415 10/15/99 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 104.00 9814302 4/28/00 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 278.00 9824477 5/17/02 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 3,095.00 9824697 617102 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 92.00 9826855 9/20/02 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 134.00 9827065 9/27/02 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 134.00 9827829 11/1/02 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 122.00 9821427 9/14/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00 9822574 11/21/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00 9809667 4/9/99 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 100.16 9811081 7/23/99 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 93.30 9811893 9/10/99 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 18.00 9814287 4/28/00 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 216.04 9815460 7/14/00 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 122.00 9816372 8/25/00 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 122.00 9816999 10/13/00 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 128.42 9817056 10/13/00 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 122.00 9819552 6/8/01 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 129.66 9819756 6/15/01 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00 9820351 7/13/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00 9821185 8/17/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 88.00 9821427 9/14/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00 9821718 9/28/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 338.84 9824024 4/12/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 104.66 9824450 5/17/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00 9825725 7/26/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00 9826476 8/23/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00 9827632 10/25/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00 9820984 8/17/01 WILLIAM BAI LEY LEGAL SETTLEMENT $ 2,085.70 9824405 4/1/02 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 75.00 9822769 10/19/01 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 119.30 Page 2 of3 City of Muskegon Invoices Submitted For Write Off~ 2003 Fiscal Year Invoice No. Date of Service/Invoice Invoiced To Reason for Write Off Amount 9824051 5/7/02 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 122.52 9823800 2/1/02 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 75.00 9824033 3/13/02 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 95.66 9829106 3/7/2003 PAT LOUIS KERBUSKI DECEASED $ 50.00 $ 12,750.17 Page 3 of 3 City of Muskegon Water/Sewer Items Submitted for Write Off - 2003 Fiscal Year Account# Service Address Customer Name Reason for Write Off Code Amount 225365001 324 W LARCH AVE JULLIAN E RUCKER CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 6.06 225365001 324 W LARCH AVE JULLIAN E RUCKER CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 10.58 225365001 324 W LARCH AVE JULLIAN E RUCKER CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 89.78 225365001 324 W LARCH AVE JULLIAN E RUCKER CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 134.47 316440303 2185 BLODGETT ST JASON JANCZYK CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 10.08 316440303 2185 BLODGETT ST JASON JANCZYK CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 18.08 316440303 2185 BLODGETT ST JASON JANCZYK CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 106.53 316440303 2185 BLODGETT ST JASON JANCZYK CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 203.04 120390003 1370 WINTERS ST CAROLYN YOUNG CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 2.09 120390003 1370 WINTERS ST CAROLYN YOUNG CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 2.99 120390003 1370 WINTERS ST CAROLYN YOUNG CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 13.40 120390003 1370 WINTERS ST CAROLYN YOUNG CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 22.38 404631002 1637 NEW ST JACOB POSTEMA CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 4.86 404631002 1637 NEW ST JACOB POSTEMA CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 56.77 309032602 784 WASHINGTON AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 30.81 309032602 784 WASHINGTON AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 55.47 309032602 784 WASHINGTON AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 250.18 309032602 784 WASHINGTON AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 466.17 225397602 1988 PARK ST JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 1.42 225397602 1988 PARK ST JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 2.12 225397602 1988 PARK ST JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 12.68 225397602 1988 PARK ST JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 19.18 220350002 121 E HOLBROOK AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 3.16 220350002 121 E HOLBROOK AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 5.55 220350002 121 E HOLBROOK AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 67.51 220350002 121 E HOLBROOK AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 109.77 217302501 1562 SANFORD ST JACK HUGHEY CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 37.78 217302501 1562 SANFORD ST JACK HUGHEY CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 53.05 207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 6.27 207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 12.64 207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 50.00 207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 124.08 Page 1 of2 City of Muskegon Water/Sewer Items Submitted for Write Off - 2003 Fiscal Year Account# Service Address Customer Name Reason for Write Off Code Amount 207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 209.21 219415004 196 IRWIN AVE KEVIN MCCLOUD CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 155.85 219415004 196 IRWIN AVE KEVIN MCCLOUD CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 284.55 219415004 196 IRWIN AVE KEVIN MCCLOUD CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 9.13 219415004 196 IRWIN AVE KEVIN MCCLOUD CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 17.30 120190004 875 MANGIN AVE MICHAEL J. WOOD CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 3.84 120190004 875 MANGIN AVE MICHAEL J. WOOD CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 2.29 120190004 875 MANGIN AVE MICHAEL J. WOOD CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 34.84 120190004 875 MANGIN AVE MICHAEL J. WOOD CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 38.28 221095101 229 E. GRAND AVE MINNIE TUNSTULL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 105.57 221095101 229 E. GRAND AVE MINNIE TUNSTULL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 186.71 201212502 135 OTTAWA ST SEAWAY MOTORS CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 347.24 399285101 1050 W. WESTERN MELLOWOOD DEVELOPMENT CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 1.53 399285101 1050 W. WESTERN MELLOWOOD DEVELOPMENT CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 0.50 399285101 1050 W. WESTERN MELLOWOOD DEVELOPMENT CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 45.99 399285101 1050 W. WESTERN MELLOWOOD DEVELOPMENT CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 7.50 206245001 316 IONAAVE ALBERT BRADFORD DECEASED WATER $ 10.17 206245001 316 IONAAVE ALBERT BRADFORD DECEASED SEWER $ 10.17 116160802 1469 EASTWOOD DR CHARMEL STEDMAN CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 8.25 116160802 1469 EASTWOOD DR CHARMEL STEDMAN CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 8.80 208165001 169 IONAAVE BILLY BROOKSHIRE UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE SEWER $ 9.04 208165001 169 IONAAVE BILLY BROOKSHIRE UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE WATER $ 7.09 218090002 1222 PECK STREET DENNIS ENDE UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE WATER $ 3.18 218090002 1222 PECK STREET DENNIS ENDE UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE SEWER $ 6.22 225122501 337 W. GRAND AVE EDWARD G HOUGHTALING UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE SEWER $ 9.74 225122501 337 W. GRAND AVE EDWARD G HOUGHTALING UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE WATER $ 8.84 216340101 1759 JEFFERSON ST DARRELL O'NEAL DECEASED SEWER $ 9.75 216340101 1759 JEFFERSON ST DARRELL O'NEAL DECEASED WATER $ 9.75 217445109 1880 SANFORD ST UP RHONDA BROWN UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE SEWER $ 13.57 217445109 1880 SANFORD ST UP RHONDA BROWN UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE WATER $ 0.88 $ 3,554.73 Page 2 of2 Commission Meeting Date: February 10, 2004 Date: January 26, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Planning & Economic Developmentlt,L RE: Public Hearing • Request for the Establishment of an Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Pursuant to Public Act 198 of 1974, as amended, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan, has requested the establishment of an Industrial Development District for property located at 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the attached resolution establishing the Industrial Development District for Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None 1/26/2004 Resolution No. 2004-18 (a) MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION APPROVING REQUEST FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. WHEREAS, pursuant to Act No. 198 of the Public Acts of 1974, as amended, the City of Muskegon has the authority to establish an "Industrial Development District" within the City of Muskegon; and WHEREAS, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan, has requested the City of Muskegon to establish an Industrial Development District on property located at 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. presently operations a production facility within the Industrial Development District; and WHEREAS, construction, acquisition, alterations, or installation of machinery and equipment has not commenced at the time of filing the request to establish this district; and WHEREAS, written notice has been given by mail to all owners of real property located within the proposed district, and to the public by newspaper advertisement in the Muskegon Chronicle and public posting of the hearing on the establishment of the proposed district; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the establishment of an Industrial Development District was held on February 10, 2004, at the regular City Commission meeting at the Muskegon City Hall at which time all of the owners of real property within the proposed district, all residents and taxpayers of the City of Muskegon, and the affected taxing jurisdictions were afforded an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Muskegon City Commission deems it to be in the best interest of the City of Muskegon that the following described land situated in the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, and the State of Michigan, to wit: CITY OF MUSKEGON DENNIS SMITH & COS SECOND ADDITION LOTS 18-19 & 20 & E 8 FT OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING SAME BLK 2 Be and here established as an Industrial Development District pursuant to the provisions of Act 198 of the Public Acts of 1974 to be known as Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. No. 2 004-1 B (a) 1/26/04 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Industrial Development District will be rescinded following the completion of capital acquisition and/or improvement activities. Resolution declared adopted. Ayes: Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter Nays: None Absent: None Attest: - ~ ~ ~i...__.n,,,!,,,&~~e:a.c;~~ Gail Kundinger Clerk, MMC I hereby certify that the foregoing constitutes a true and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, Michigan, at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2004. 1/26/04 Affirmative Action (231)724-6703 FAX: (231)722-1214 ) fi~TNiJ!6Y;rarlment l<'AX: (231)726-5617 :r Citv Manager (231)724-6724 FAX: (231)722-1214 West Michigan's Shoreline City Civil Service 1231)724-6716 CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT fAX: (231)724-4405 Clerk January 2 7, 2004 (231)724-6705 tAX: (231)724-4178 Community and ,Jt\i\i 2 7 ?004 (l~f{ftltNf~ces City of Muskegon FAX: (231)726-2501 Assessor's Office Computer Info, 93 3 Terrace Street t2lHi;T.~144 FAX: {231)722-4301 Muskegon, MI 49440 RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. ~~-1~)4~~~ To Whom It May Concern: tAX: (231)724-6768 YlIT)~it6192 A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198 (<AX: (23 I}724-6985 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling Income Tax Systems, Inc., 301 W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441. (231)724-6770 FAX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and Leisure Services representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard. (2311724-6704 FAX: (231)724-1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at (231) 724-6702. Plannine/Zoning (23 l\7U-6702 FAX: (231)724-6790 --~-- Sincerely, / /t/l<e. a--:, '1'(__, . .,. - ( ~onna Anguilm (j Assistant Planner rubl/lih\~~Ilifi Dept. l<A : (231)722-4188 Treasurer's Office 123J1724-6720 FA : (231)724-6768 jjfl/tef2~!~~~\ Dept. FA : (231)724-6768 Wati:r Filtration '231)724--4106 FAX: (l31)7~S..5290 City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, MI 49443-0536 www.shorelinecity.com Affirmative Action (231 }724-6703 FAX: (231)722-1214 ti\siNfJ!fjH~nlizntion FAX: (231)726-5181 fi}iNtr6~;rarlmcnt FAX: {231)726-5617 City Manager (231 )724-6724 FAX: (231)722-1214 Wcst Michigan's Shornline City Civil Service (l31)7l4-6716 CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT FAX: (231)724-4405 Clerk January 27, 2004 /lJ 1)724-6705 FAX: {231)724-4178 Muskegon Public Schools Hackley Administration Building Computer Info. 349 W. Webster Avenue (l~nw:r-i,44 FAX: (231)721-4301 Muskegon, MI 49440 Engineering_ Dept. (231 }724-6707 RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District - t,'AX: (231)727-6904 Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. rlfiY7\eiln~ FAX: (231)724-6768 To Whom It May Concern: A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling Income Tax Systems, Inc., 30! W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441. (2J 1)724-6770 FAX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and Leisure Services representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard. (l31)7l4-6704 FAX: (231)724--1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at (231) 724-6702. SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY Plannine/Zoning Sincerely, (2311724'6702 FAX: (231)724-6790 -, • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signature ~;;- item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. l J. '--,-? • Print your name and address on the reverse X {/Vtl<)1VA, . 1.~ • so that we can return the card to you. Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 8. ~eceived by ( Printed Name) IC. Date of Delivery Lonna Angmlm or on the front if space permits. XS/1lU,./f)f/ {..JW1<..f:ia., I·· t', ·04, Assistant Planner D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? D Yes bl,1:~21-~J~ Dept. ii YES, enter delivery address below: FAX: (231)722-4188 Treu1urer's Office (231)724-6720 FAX: (231)724-6768 3. Service Type n'!f)fzt~!Ji\Dept. Bf Certified Mail D Express Mail FAX: (231)724-6768 D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise D Insured Mail D C.0.0, Waler Filtration (131)724-4106 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) • Yes FAX: (231)755-5290 2, Article Number City of Muskegon, S (Transfer from service label} PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRl-03-Z-0985 Affirmative Aclion rrn )'24-6703 fAX: (231)722-1214 tiWl.ffff~~Rlizafom FAX: (231)726-S181 Cemetery Deparlmenl (231 )124-6783 FAX: (231)726-5617 City Manager rm )124-6724 FAX: (231)722-1214 Civil Service fl JI )124-6716 CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT FAX: (231)724-4405 Clerk January 27, 2004 flJI 1714-6705 FAX: (231)724-4178 Community and ,2~f{~r:i-~Wtes Muskegon Community College FAX: (231)726-2S01 221 Quarterline Road Computer Info. Muskegon, MI 49442 o~n;14_~744 FAX: (231)722-4301 RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. To Whom It May r.:oncern: A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198 nn)~Itti,92 FAX: (231)724-6985 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441. Income Tu flJ1)'24-6770 FAX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard. Leisure Sen-ices fl31)7l4-6704 FAX: (2Jl)724-ll96 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at (231) 724-6702, Sincerely, SENDER: COMPLETE WIS SECTION Plannim:UZoning /" rm 112.i:6102 FAX: (231)724-6790 -: _J)·;i\-'V½', ' l__ ( · • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. t)d..Agent • Print your name and address on the reverse X D Addressee Lonna Anguilm so that we can return the card to you. B. Rece~e,.d br (Printed Name) C. Date f Deliyerx Assistant Planner • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, l(, ( · ~ /\A.('{,', · J )4 {l '( or on !he front if space permits. o. Is delivery address different from item 1? D Yes If YES, enter deUvery address below: Treasurer's Office flJJ)724'6720 ~'AX: (231)724•6768 3. Service Type Ci' Certified Mail D Express Mail D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise D Insured Mail • C.0.D. Waler Filtration rm 112<-m6 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes FAX: (231)755.5290 City of Muskegon, ~ 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) --;aooosd_o 001'-13733 9c)(Y-f PS. Fnrm '.i811 A1m11st ::>001 Dome.<ltic Return Aeceiot 2ACPAl-03-Z-0985 Affirmative Action (231\724-6703 FAX: (231)722-1214 City J\.fana2er (231\724-6724 FAX: (231)722-1214 Civil Service (231 )724-6716 CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT FAX: (231)724-4405 Clerk January 27, 2004 (231)724-6705 MX: (231)724-4178 Community and ,2~1:,r:i1~7Jces FAX: (231)726-2501 Muskegon Area Intermediate School District 630 Harvey Street Computer Info. Muskegon, MI 49442 ,2~HW4-~144 FAX: (231)721-4301 RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. To Whom It May Concern: nril~~t/~'¥l~ FAX: (231)724-6768 A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441. Income Tu (231)724-6770 FAX: {131)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establislunent of an Industrial Development District has been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard. Leisure Sen-Ices (231)724-6704 FAX: (231)724-1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at (231) 724-6702. Sincerely, SENDER: COMB.LETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY , Plan nine/Zoning \....-j. . ' (231 \724-6702 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete FAX: (231)724-6790 .11ti'-'-"- item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Print your name and address on the reverse Lonna Anguilm so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Assistant Planner or on the front if space permits. • Is delivery address different from ilem 1? ~~1;~'u°i'.w. tlftUJt. &J1 if YES, enter delivery address below: Trusurer's Office (231)724-6720 fAX: (131)714-6768 ((; 3 oEf iw'LL,e_y, '1 lcuDlc '11 I I 3. Service Type I L/9'Lf Lf J. )lf Certffied Mail 0 Registered D Express Mail D Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail • C.O.D. Water Fillration 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes (231)724-4106 FAX: (131)755-5290 2. Article Number City of Muskegon, ~ (Transfer from setvice label) PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRl-03-Z-0985 Affirmative Action (231)724-6703 FAX: (231)722-1214 Cemeleiy Deparlmenl flJI \714-6783 FAX: (231)726-5617 City Manager fl]) )714-6724 FAX: (231)712-1214 Civil Service flJl\124-6716 CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT FAX: (231)724-4405 January 27, 2004 Clerk flJ I \124-670! FAX: (231)724-4178 Community and (l~f{ft4.i~'i'tes Muskegon County Commission •·AX: (231)726-2501 990 Terrace Street Compuler Info. Muskegon,MI49442 ,2~Hl~7.i144 FAX: (231)722-4301 RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. To Whom It May Concern: A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198 nrrNtf.'6192 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling FAX: (231)724-6985 Systems, Inc., 301 W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441. Income Tu (231 )724-6770 MX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard. Leisure Sen·ices fl JI }724-6704 FAX: (231)724-1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at (231) 724-6702. Sincerely, ,,-· SENDER: <;OMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY Plannin2'Zoning fl31)7l4'670l FAX: (231)724-6790 ))>)l \.,. ( {;.,. • ---- .1.. Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ' l • Print your name and address on the reverse Lonna Anguilm so that we can return the card to you. ery • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Assistant Planner or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from ite 1. Article Addressed lo: ( fi1~\i~2:~~ht Dept, lf YES, enter delivery address below: FAX: (231)722-4188 'n lGsk<:5u11 ~cun+y Comm1 nn,"' ,- ~, Treasurer's Office •~<...'...' 1 e.1 , a..c e.... flJI )714-6720 FAX: (131)724-6768 I\\ US½Jc_,n 3. Service Type n'f/ffz~~~~~\ Dept, 1:81 Certified Mail D Express Mail FAX: (231)724-6768 D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise D Insured Mail • C.0.0. Water Filtration fl31l7l4-4106 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) • Yes -1 too 65 cl O 00 I '-/ 3 7.3 3 9/ rf I FAX: (131)755-5290 2. Article Number City of Muskegon, 9; (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, AUQUSl 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPR!-03-Z-0965 Affirmative Action 12Jl l724-670J fAX: (2Jl)722-l214 Assessor/Equalization ll31)7l4-6708 FAX: (231)726-5181 Cemetery Deparlmenl llJ! 1124-6783 FAX: (231)726-5617 City Manager llJI 1724-6724 FAX: (2JJ)722-JZl4 Civil Service CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT llJ!l724-6716 FAX: (231)724-4405 Clerk January 27, 2004 231)724-6705 1'AX: (231)724-4178 Community and Neigh. Services 1231)724-6717 FAX: (231)726-2501 Hackley Public Library 296 W. Webster Avenue Computer Info. Muskegon, MI 49440 u~n;~7.~,4 . FAX: (231)722-4301 RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District - ~~,\~1~'t-Jhfepl, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. FAX: (131)727-6904 Finance D~t. To Whom It May Concern: 123 ll724-6n3 FAX: (231)724-6768 A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441. Income Tax 1231)724-6770 FAX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has been set for Tuesday, February 10, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933 lflfffl~~if1Tices Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and FAX: (231)728-4371 representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the oppotiunity to be heard. Leisure Services 1231)714-6704 !<AX: (231)724-1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at (231) 724-6702. Sincerely, SENDEf!: COMPLETE THIS SECTION · COMPLETE THJ5 SECTICN ON DELIVERY •! Plannine/Zoning ,.,.--, 1131 l7lf-6702 ,. 1 •• , • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete FAX: (231)724-6790 l.. c,1-- :+,l,\. item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. J • Print your name and address on the reverse X ·1 ·. · so that we can return the card to you. B. ;'Received by ( Printed Name) Lonna Angm Ill • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Assistant Planner or on the front ii space permits. X ::S-: .. . •,t , ,, D. Is delivery address different from item 1? D Yes 1. Article Addressed to: Public Works Depl. ii YES, enter delivery address below: D No llJI )724-4100 FAX: (231)722-4188 /-JQcl<-\ ej 't=t,bl i c L1 bra.y Treasurer's Office cJ9 Co w. we_\::i3rcy-~ [ 1131 )724-6720 FAX: (231)724-6768 .l'Y'\ us½5cJ, 111 \ 3. Service Type 49YYD 31- Certified Mail D Registered D Express Mail 0 Return Recelpl for Merchandise D Insured Mail • C.O.D. Water Fillr• tion (131)724-4106 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) • Yes MX: (231)75S-.5290 2. Article Number . ~rc,00 QSQ O 00/ cf 37 3 3 9 / 79 C 1·ty of M us k egon, 9. (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPAl·03-Z-098s Affirmative Action (231 l7l4-670J }<'AX: (lJI)722-lll4 Cemetery Departmcnl (231 l7l 4-678J FAX: {231)726-5617 Citv Mana~er f2Jll714-6724 FAX: (231)722•1214 Civil Service CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT (231 )7!4-67 (6 FAX: (231)724-4405 January 27, 2004 Clerk (231 l114-6705 FAX: (231)724-4178 Community and {2~f~1r:i-i11~ces Scott and Danette Sherman 1-'AX: (231)726-2501 Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. Computer Info. 301 W. Laketon Avenue a~n;24_i744 FAX: (231)722-4301 Muskegon, MI 49441 RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. Finance Di;t!I. (231 }724-6713 FAX: (231)724-6768 Dear Scott and Danette: Fire Dept. A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198 (231 )714-6792 MX: (231)724-6985 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Jvluskegon, Michigan 49441. Income Tax (231 )7!4-6770 FAX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard. Leisure Services (lJI )724-6704 FAX: (231)724-1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at ~rr1°-r~i~.mf' (231) 724-6702. FAX: (231)722-1214 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ·' COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY Sincerely, Plannine-/Zoning (ll1)7l4'670l _____ • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signature FAX: (231)724-6790 item 4 if Restricted Delive,y is desired. D Agent / l /I' X~,'7-;%. / / '>'\L1,L{1' -·- /~ . r· • L- L.:· L, • Print your name and address on the reverse so that w~ can return the card to you. D Addressee . Lonna Anguilm Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. B, Received bJ..!!'1nted t!ame) L i 5 ~... ,,, -~~ IC. Date ~D~~ivery D. ls delivery address different from item 1? /--- ;;;, ,,, ?1/ D Yes ., Assistant Planner 1. Article Addressed to: if YES, enter delivery address below: D No Public Works Dept. (ll1)7l4-4100 Sc.c:,t\---1-Da_ne..-\\e.. '2.he..nn::u, I FAX: (231)722-4188 ::,:ce_~n\ ,nQ.I-CJD\;;~ Treasurer's Office (lll )714-6710 FAX: (231)724-6768 2,c:-, \ \J:::. - ~e..-\-cc, \'(\ c~):.,e0() n \ "\l. \ 3. Service Type ,l8\ Certified Mail D Express Mall rrirrHt~!f& Dept. FAX: (231)724-6768 D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise ~9l\~I D Insured Mail • C.D.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes Waler Fiilntion (231)724-4106 FAX: (231)755,5290 2, Article Number City of Muskegon, 9 rr,ansfer from se,v;ce label) 7 Doc, 0 S2 a 0014 3 7 3 3 q I (0 7 PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt nr-Pi:i1.n-:t.7.noo" Date: February 2, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Ric Scott RE: DNR Grant Application SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To authorize staff to re-submit grant applications to the DNR Trust Fund for the purchase of the Consumers Energy Property and to construct phase I of the Lakeshore Trail We have applied for these grants each of the last two years. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consumers Energy Purchase - None Lakeshore Trail construction - $425,000 BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Leisure Services Board Recommends Approval Affirmative Action (23 1)724-6703 FAX: (23 1)722-1 2 14 C itv Manager (231)724-6724 FAX: (23 1)722-12 14 Date: February 2, 2004 C ivil Service <2311724-61 16 FAX: (23 1)724-4405 To : Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Ric Scott C lerk /23 1)724-6705 FAX: (231)724-4178 Re: DNR Grant Applications I am requesting authorization to re-submit two grant applications to the DNR Trust Fund . The application due date is April 1 . Both of these applications were sent in Computer Info. last year, but were turned down. dmY4 1 -'6144 FAX: (23 1)722-4301 This will need to be a public hearing, as the grant requires that a public notice be given to allow public input. The purchase of the Consume rs Energy property for a ~~r;m~% FAX: (231)724-6768 sports complex has been discussed thoroughly recently. The grant application would be for $1,000,000 with $740,000 coming from the Trust Fund and the $260,000 ~!iY)~lf!<>1n local match coming from Consumers Energy. FAX: (23 1)724-6985 Income Tax The construction of phase I of the Lakeshore Trail will /231)724-6770 FAX: (23 1)724-6768 cost approximately $1,800,000. We have requested funding for $1,000,000 from MOOT . The maximum amount of funding through DNR is $375,000. Therefore I am requesting that we apply for $425,000 from the DNR. The Leisul'e Services city will need to provide the remaining $425,000. Much /231)724-6704 FAX: (23 1)724-11 96 of this can come from the Golf Course fund, but there will need to be an additional $200,000 or so needed i'lHi'f~ti48r beyond the golf course fund. This funding will not be FAX: (231)722- 12 14 needed until 2006. Plnnnim!/Zoning I would ask that you authorize the submittal of both (23 1)724'- 6702 FAX: (231)724-6790 grant applications, and adopt the attached resolutions. Thank you for your consideration. Treasurer's Office (231)724-6720 FAX: (231)724-6768 n'!/\'f2~!~~n~ Dept. FAX: (23 1)724-6768 Water Filtration (2311724-4106 FAX: (231)755-5290 City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P._o. ~ox 536, Muskegon, MI 49443-0536 www.shorehnec1ty.com RESOLUTION NO. 2004-18 ( b 1 ) MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMISSION OF GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTUCTION OF PHASE I OF THE LAKESHORE TRAIL UNDER THE MNRTF. WHEREAS, the City of Muskegon wishes to construct phase I of the Lakeshore Trail; and WHEREAS, grant applications are now being received by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) grants, which will provide up to 75% funding for the project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Commission of the City of Muskegon approve the submission of the grant application to the MN RTF for $500,000 for the construction of phase I of the Lakeshore Trail; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City's $1,300,000 match will be provided, and the City hereby commits itself to complete this project if the grant application is approved. Adopted this 10th day of February, 2004 AYES: Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis NAYS: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION 2004-1 S(b 1) This resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10, 2004. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976. CITY OF MUSKEGON 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-18(b ) MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMISSION OF GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE CONSUMER'S ENERGY PROPERTY UNDER THE MNRTF. WHEREAS, the City of Muskegon wishes to purchase approximately 56 acres of property from Consumer's Energy for the development of a sports complex; and WHEREAS, the property has been appraised at $1,000,000, WHEREAS, grant applications are now being received by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF), which will provide up to 75% funding for the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Commission of the City of Muskegon approve the submission of the grant application to the MNRTF for $1,000,000 for the for the purchase of the Consumer's Energy property, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City's $260,000 match will be provided, and the City hereby commits itself to complete this purchase if the grant application is approved. Adopted this 10th day of February, 2004 AYES: Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis NAYS: None ABSENT: Non e CERTIFICATION 2004-18(b2) This resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10, 2004. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976. CITY OF MUSKEGON Gail A. Kundinger, MMC, City C Date: February 10, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Engineering RE: Public Hearing Create Special Assessment District for: Beidler Street, Laketon to Southern Ave. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of the Beidler st., Laketon to Southern Ave., and to create the special assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the attached resolution COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF MUSKEGON Resolution No. - - - - - Resolution At First Hearing Creating Special Assessment District For Beidler St., Laketon to Southern Ave. Location and Description of Properties to be Assessed: See Exhibit A attached to this resolution RECITALS: I. A hearing has been held on February 10, 2004 at 5:30 o'clock p.m. at the City Commission Chambers. Notice was given by mail and publication as required by law. 2. That estimates of costs of the project, a feasibility report and valuation and benefit information are on file with the City and have been reviewed for this hearing. 3. At the hearing held February 10, 2004, there were ___% objections by the owners of the property in the district registered at the hearing either in writing received before or at the hearing or by owners or agents present at the hearing, and the Commission has considered the advisability of proceeding with the project. FINDINGS: I. The City Commission has examined the estimates of cost to construct the project including all assessable expenses and determines them to be reasonable. 2. The City Commission has considered the value of the property to be assessed and the value of the benefit to be received by each property proposed to be assessed in the district after the improvements have been made. The City Commission determines that the assessments of costs of the City project will enhance the value of the properties to be assessed in an amount at least equivalent to the assessment and that the improvement thereby constitutes a benefit to the property. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I. The City Commission hereby declares a special assessment district to include the property set forth in Exhibit A attached to this resolution. 2. The City Commission determines to proceed with the improvements as set forth in the feasibility study and estimates of costs, and directs the City Engineer to proceed with project design, preparation of specifications and the bidding process. If appropriate and if bonds are to be sold for the purposes of financing the improvements, the Finance Department shall prepare plans for financing including submission of application to the Michigan Department of Treasury and the beginning of bond proceedings. 3. The City Commission hereby appoints a Board of Assessors consisting of City Commissioners-------------~ and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ and the City Assessor who are hereby directed lo prepare an assessment roll. Assessments shall be made upon front foot basis. 4. Based on the City's Special Assessment policy and preliminary estimates it is expected that approximately 25.17% of the cost of the street improvement will be paid by special assessments. 5. Upon submission of the special assessment roll, the City staff is hereby directed to notify all owners and persons interested in properties to be assessed of the hearing at which the City Commission will consider confirmation of the special assessment roll. This resolution adopted. Ayes _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Nays _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ CITY OF MUSKEGON By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk ACKNOWLEDGMENT This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10, 2004. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976. CITY OF MUSKEGON By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk EXHIBIT A Beidler Street, Laketon to Southern Ave. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT All properties abutting that section of Beidler Street, Laketon to Southern Avc. LOCATION MAP _J L GRAND AVE. ,_ (/J f NO SCALE SOUTHERN A VE. FOREST AVE. ,-: (/J PROJECT L CATION Lu a '< G ,-: a:' :;,: (/J a a :,.. Vi :,.. :SC a:: DALE AVE ~ a r5 :r: w (/J LARCH AVE LAKETON AVE ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY For Beidler Street, Laketon to Sonthcrn Ave. The reconstruction of Beidler street between Laketon & Southern, see attached exhibit, was initiated by the City due lo the conditions of the pavement and underground utilities. The existing pavement has deteriorated to a level where, we believe, a total reconstruction is necessary. This section of road has not had, to the best of our records, any major work since it's resurfacing back in 1929 and has an average Pavement Condition Index of around 40. and as a result of the lack of major work, most of the existing curbs are terrible shape and the drainage facilities are in need of upgrade. The improvements being proposed, reconstruction, consist of following; 1. Complete removal of existing pavement and replace with a new street section that would include curb & gutter of and a proposed width of 32' back to back. The proposed width is about a two foot wider than existing to accommodate the on street parking along one side of the street. 2. spot repairs on the existing sanitary sewer main 3. Replace existing watermain along with water services A memo from the Assessor's office, which addresses the appraisal and benefit information, is attached. The preliminary cost estimate for the work associated with paving is approximately $307,000 with the length of the project being approximately 1600 lineal feet (project length) or 2198 of assessable footage. This translates into an estimated improvement cost of $140 per assessable foot. The assessment figure will be at a cost not to exceed $35.15 per assessable foot as established in the 2004 Special Assessment for this type of improvement MUSKEGON COUNTY M C H G A N BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Paul T. Baade, Chair District 10 Bill Gill, Vice-Chair District 8 January 28, 2004 Douglas A. Bennett Mohammed Al-Shatel, City Engineer District? City of Muskegon 933 Terrace Street Charles L. Buzzell District 2 Muskegon, MI 49443 James J. Derezinski Mr. Al-Shale!: District 4 In accordance with your request, I have examined the proposed special assessment Ma!Vin R. Engle district entailing the reconstruction of Beidler Street between W Laketon Avenue and District 5 Southern Avenue. The purpose of this analysis is to document the reasonableness of Louis A. McMurray this special assessment district by identifying and quantifying any accrued benefits. It District 9 is subject to the normal governmental restrictions of escheat, taxation, police power and eminent domain. The effective date is January 28, 2004. Robert Scolnik District 11 In conclusion, it is my opinion that the special assessment amounts justly and reasonably represents the accrued benefits to the properties encompassed by this I. John Snider II District3 project. The amounts reflect the sum of the innnediate estimated value enhancement and the intrinsic value that will accrue from an overall increase in property values due Nancy A. Waters to an improved quality of life created by the proposed project. As previously District 6 presented, the proposed special assessment district encompasses primarily residential Stephen R. Wisniewski properties. The front foot rate of$35.15 for the reconstruction of the above District 1 mentioned project area appears reasonable in light of an analysis that indicates a possible enhancement of $36.40. The conclusions are based upon the data presented within this limited analysis in restricted fonnat, and on supporting information in my files. Sincerely, J ~L \{_,,'._ C\. C¾...;_,)vvG Vicki A Emery, CMAE 3 Senior Appraiser EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT • 173 E. APPLE AVE., BUILDll~G C • MUSKEGON, Ml 49442 (2J 1) 724 -G386 • FAX (231) 724-1129 TTY (231) 722-4103 • An EEO I ADA I AA Employer recycled paper January 30, 2004 Dear :OWNERS NAME OWNERS ADDRESS OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE, OWNERS ZIPCODE 1 The City of Muskegon is asking for your support for improvement of the street adjoining your property located at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET. The City of Muskegon believes that by making the proposed street improvements you will have less road noise, dust, and wear and tear on your vehicle. In addition, street improvements provide easier access for delivery of services such as snow plowing, mail delivery, and bus service. Called a special assessment district, the largest percentage of the proposed street improvement will be paid for by the City of Muskegon (via local funds and or grants); however, it will be necessary for you to cover a share of the cost (which you can spread over a period of ten years) based on the amount of property you own bordering the street. A description of the project, including the associated cost to you and the City, is located in the documents attached to this letter. While the City of Muskegon believes that the proposed improvements will result in a safer and cleaner street while adding curb appeal to your property, you do have the right to ask further questions, decline, or protest participation in this particular project. Please carefully review the enclosed materials and call the City's Engineering Department at 724-6707 or your ward commissioner if you require more information. A public hearing is also scheduled for this project on FEBRUARY 10, 2004. If you attend this public hearing you will be given an opportunity to present your questions and potential concerns on the proposed special assessment district to the commission. Also located in this packet of materials is a Special Assessment Hearing Response Card. If mailed back to the City of Muskegon City Clerk's Office before the scheduled public hearing your vote will be added to the tabulation of votes during the public hearing. If you do not send in this form your vote counts as "in favor" of the project. Thank you for your participation in improving the quality of life in the Muskegon community. January 30, 2004 OWNERS NAME OWNERS ADDRESS OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE OWNERS ZIPCODE 1 Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX: at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET NOTICE OF HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Dear Property Owner: The Muskegon City Commission is considering whether or not to create a special assessment district which would assess your property for the following paving project: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. The proposed special assessment district will be located as follows: All parcels abutting Beidler St. from Laketon Ave .. to Southern Ave. It is proposed that a portion of the above improvement will be paid by special assessment against properties in the aforementioned district. Following are conditions of the proposed special assessment which are important to you. Public Hearings An initial public hearing to consider the creation of a special assessment district will be held at the City of Muskegon City Commission Chambers on FEBRUARY 10, 2004 at 5:30 P.M. You are encouraged to appear at this hearing, either in person, by agent or in writing to express your opinion, approval, or objection concerning the proposed special assessment. We are enclosing a Hearing Response Card for you to indicate your agreement or opposition to the special assessment. This card includes the property identification and description, assessable footage per City policy, and the estimated cost of the assessment. You may also appear, as above, in lieu of, or in addition to mailing your response card to the City Clerk. Written objections or appearances must be made at or prior to the hearing. NOTE: THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT WILL BE CREATED OR NULLIFIED AT THIS HEARING. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO COMMENT AT THIS HEARING IF YOU WANT YOUR OPINION COUNTED FOR THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. A second public hearing will be held, if the district is created, to confirm the special assessment roll after the project is completed. You will be mailed a separate notice for the second hearing. At this second hearing the special assessment costs will be spread on the affected properties accordingly. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT AGAINST YOUR PARCEL EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THIS HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED AT THE SECOND HEARING, YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE ROLL TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THE INITIAL HEARING OR AT THE SECOND HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY AGENT, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST. By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the properties to be assessed shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement. Estimated Costs The total estimated cost of the street portion of the project is $307,000.00 of which approximately 25.17% ($77,259.70) will be paid by special assessment to property owners. Your property's estimated share of the special assessment is shown on the attached hearing response card. The remaining costs will be paid by the City. The street assessment, which covers improvements to the roadway, may be paid in installments over a period of up to ten (10) years. Any work on drive approaches or sidewalks will be assessed to the property at actual contract prices and these costs may also be paid in installments over ten (10) years. Please note this work is in addition to the street special assessment. Please refer to the enclosed sheet entitled Special Assessment Payment Options for more information on the payment options and financial assistance programs available. I urge you to return the enclosed hearing response card indicating your preference and to attend the scheduled public hearing. Your views are important to the City and to your neighbors. Additional information, including preliminary project plans and cost estimates is available in the Engineering Department located on the second floor of City Hall. Regular business hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday except holidays. Sincerely, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1577 Project Title: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX Assessable Frontage: $77.25 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,715.34 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 BLK 455 LOTS 9-10 Your vote COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR • I AM OPPOSED • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. ---------- CoOwner/Spouse ------------ Signature Signature Address Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. H-1577 - BEIDLER ST. LAKETON AVE. to SOUTHERN AVE. PROPERTY OWNER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TABULATION EsEI PERCENTAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS- 43 FOR OPPOSE LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE 2198.00 ...... 43 1560 BEIDLER 24-205-433-0001-00 41.25 21 1561 BEIDLER 24-205-434-0008-00 82,50 FRONT FEET OPPOSED 1646.75 .Jk.-92% '1 'i,.. (o (_ 20 1573 SEIDLER 24-205-434-0009..QO 82.50 42 1574 BEIDLER 24-205-433-0002..QO 82.50 RESPONDING FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 0.00 0.00% 18 1593 BEIDLER 24-205-434-0011-00 40.00 38 1600 BEIDLER 24-205-433-0019-00 41.25 NOT RESPONDING - FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 551.25 25.08% 17 1607 BEIDLER 24-205-434-0012-10 47.50 37 1608 BEIDLER 24-205-433-0019-10 41.25 TOTAL FRONT FEET lN FAVOR 551.25 25.08% 36 1624 BEIDLER 24-205-436-0001-00 4i.25 35 1632 BEIDLER 24-205-436-0002-00 41.25 16 1635 BEIDLER 24-205-435-0008-00 55.00 15 1641 BEIDLER 24-205-435-0009-00 55.00 14 1651 BEIDLER 24-205-435-0010-00 35.00 13 1657 BEIDLER 24-205-435-0011-00 75.00 31 1664 BEIDLER 24-205-436-0017-10 40.00 11 1687 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0006-00 40.00 10 1693 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0006-10 40.00 9 1699 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0006-20 40.00 8 1705 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0009-00 45,00 7 1715 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0010-00 40.00 27 1720 BEIDLER 24-205-453-0015-10 40.00 V1 6 1721 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0010-10 42.00 '!;O ,., ~ '1 ~ "·co ,'l 0 26 5 1724 1727 BEIDLER BEIDLER 24-205-453-0015-20 24-205-454-0010-20 40.00 42.00 ? s 2i> ~ :'- C e 4 1733 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0010-30 41.00 c,- 0 0 25 1736 BE!DLER 24-205-453-0015-3 40.00 I t- """' ~.k.. \ 24 1752 BEIDLER 24-205-456-0001-00 50.00 - ~ 3 1755 BEIDLER 24-205-455-0008-00 41.25 _,I ~ 1=( ,._<) 23 2 1766 1769 BEIDLER BEIDLER 24-205-456-0001 _, 0 24-205-455-0008-10 65.00 82.50 ' ~ 22 1780 BEIDLER 24-205-456-0016-00 79.50 "' -, i ·-c:,; -~ ;- "s ·= ,, =() b ~ ~ 1 1785 BEIDLER 24-205-455-0009-00 77.25 i 1 ~ j 0.00 1490.00 <) ' _""( ;;'\ - TOi:ALS ~ d ~, <::J <>'. = "' ? c;D ] J v/J (\ .g =cl "\ - 0 "'' -"' 13 r' -:., _:,v -1 ~ ~ <;::, -5. r G 'v i""\ ~ / cl 0 -./ c::::i - i 3 i{ H r :z_ TABULATED AS OF: 04:52 PM { ,-\ WI -.__) ' e '. ""I 0 " ~ 0 2/10/20044:52 PMTABULATION OF THE RESPONSES TO THE SP. ASS. HEARING ON BEIDLER CITY OF MUSKEGON STREET- H-1577 BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE .. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Note: You may receive this application several times -Ifyou have already applied, please discard. Dear Resident: The City of Muskegon has selected the street abutting your property for repairs. To assist homeowners, who may have difficulty paying the cost of street repairs, the City offers assessment waivers through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for eligible households and families. If you meet the CDBG program q4alifications, the City may pay the street assessment for you to the extent that funds are available. Application Requirements: ✓ Applicants must submit proof that their total household income does not exceed 65% of Area Median Income (see chart below); Proof of income may include copies of Wage & Tax Statement (W-2's) from the year 2003, pension or other benefit checks, bank statements for direct deposits or agency statements for all household mcome. 2002 165% MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME CHART I FAMILY SIZE INCOME LIMIT 1 $27,885 2 31,850 3 35,880 4 39,845 5 43,030 6 46,326 7 49,400 8 52,585 For each extra, add 3,185 ✓ Applicants must submit proof that they both own and occupy property at the time of application; Land Contract purchasers must obtain approval of titleholder prior to receiving assistance. Proof of ownership should be a deed, mortgage, or land contract; proof of occupancy can be a copy of a driver's license or other official document showing both your name and address. ✓ Applicants must submit proof of current property insurance. Please complete the first four (4) sections of the application on the reverse side of this notice, and return it, along with suppmiing documentation, to: City of Muskegon Community & Neighborhood Services 933 Terrace Street, 2nd Floor Muskegon,MI49440 For further information, please contact this office by calling 724-6717, weekdays from 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 171e City reserves the right to ver(fji all application information, and to reject any applications that containfals{fied injbrmation or insufficient doc1rmentation. Special Assessment Payment Options Property owners in the City of Muskegon who are being specially assessed for street, sidewalk or other public improvements may pay their assessment in the following ways: I. Lump Sum Payment in Full Assessments may be paid in full within sixty (60) days of the confirmation of the special assessment roll without interest. II. Installment Payments Assessments not paid within the first sixty (60) days may be paid in installments over several years as follows: Street and Alley Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments. For example, if the amount of your assessment is $850.00, you will be billed $85.00 per year plus applicable interest as described below. Driveway, Sidewalk, and Approach Assessments- Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments plus applicable interest as described below. Interest- Simple interest is charged at the rate of 5.00% per year unless the City has borrowed money to complete the project for which you are assessed and has pledged you assessments for repayment of the borrowed money. In such cases, the interest you are charged is equal to the interest rate the City must pay on the borrowed money plus 1.00%. Ill. Special Assessment Deferral (Low Income Seniors and Disabled Persons) To qualify for a special assessment deferral you or your spouse (if jointly owned) must: • Be 65 years or older or be totally or permanently disabled. • Have been a Michigan resident for five (5) years or more and have owned and occupied the homestead being assessed for five (5) years or more. • Be a citizen of the U.S. • Have a total household income not in excess of $16,823.00 • Have a special assessment of $300.00 or more. Under this program the State of Michigan will pay the entire balance owing of the special assessment, including delinquent, current, and further installments. At the time of payment a lien will be recorded on your property in favor of the State of Michigan. Repayment to the State must be made at the time the property is sold or transferred or after the death of the owner(s). During the time the special assessment is deferred interest is accrued at the rate of 6.00% per year. IV. Further Information About the Above Programs Further information about any of the above payment options may be obtained by calling either the City Assessor's Office at 724-6708 or the City Treasurer's Office at 724-6720. Applications may be obtained at the Muskegon County Equalization Office in the Muskegon County building or City of Muskegon Assessor's Office in City Hall. V. Additional Special Assessment Payment Assistance Qualified low and moderate income homeowners who are being assessed may be eligible for payment assistance through the City of Muskegon Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Assistance from this program will be available to the extent that funds are available. To obtain further information and determine whether you are eligible, contact the Community and Neighborhood Services Department at 724-6717. CITY OF MUSKEGON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DJSTRICTS IN AN EFFORT TOWARDS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT, the Muskegon City Commission is proposing that special assessment districts be created for the following projects: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. AND SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. The specific locations of the special assessment districts and the prope,ties proposed to be assessed are: All parcels abutting Beidler St. from Laketon Ave. to Southern Ave. All parcels abutting McCracken St. from Sherman Blvd. to Lakeshore Dr. And All parcels abutting Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln St. to Beach St. The City Commission proposes that the City and property owners by means of special assessments will share the cost of improvement. You may examine preliminary plans and cost estimates in the City Hall's Engineering Depaitment during regular business hours - between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on weekdays, except holidays. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS ON FEBRUARY Ill, 2()/14 AT 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THE HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED (AT A LATER HEARING) YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ROLL'S CONFIRMATION TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICI-IIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THIS HEARING OR AT THE HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY YOUR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST. By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the property to be assessed shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement. PUBLISH: January 31, 2004 Gail Kundinger, City Clerk ADA POLICY The City will provide necessary appropriate auxiliary aids and services, for example, signers for the hearing impaired, audiotapes for the visually impaired, etc., for disabled persons who want to attend the meeting, upon twenty-four hours notice to the City. Contact: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Ml 49440 (231) 724-6705 or TDD (231) 724-6773 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) ss COUNTY OF MUSKEGON ) TO CREATE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FOLLOWING: Beidler St., Laketon Ave. to Southern Ave. THE DEPONENT SAYS THAT THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED UPON EACH OWNER OF OR PARTY IN INTEREST IN PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED IN THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHOSE NAME APPEARS UPON THE LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE BY FIRST CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL, WITH POSTAGE PREPAID, ADDRESSED TO EACH SUCH OWNER OR PARTY IN INTEREST AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON SAID LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS BY DEPOSITING THEM IN AN OFFICIAL UNITED STATES MAIL RECEPTACLE ON THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2004. GAIL A. KUNDINGER, CITY CLERK SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _ _ _ DAY OF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2004. NOTARY PUBLIC, MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES _ _ _ _ _ _ __ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT H 1577 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. 1 BOGNER DALE R/PATRICIA A ASSESSABLE FEET: 77.25 24-205-455-0009-00 2254 BLUFFTON COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1785. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,715.34 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.5146 2 WINICK! EDWARD/JOANN ASSESSABLE FEET: 82.5 24-205-455-0008-10 1826 CROWLEY ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1769. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,899.ss 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.7534 3 WINICK! EDWARD/JOANN ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-455-0008-00 1826 CROWLEY ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1755. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 4 WACKERLE MARC A/GINA M ASSESSABLE FEET: 41 24-205-454-0010-30 4922 MCARTHUR RD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1733. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49442 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,441.15 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8653 5 MILLS DAVID ASSESSABLE FEET: 42 24-205-454-0010-20 1727 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1727. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,476.30 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9108 6 MILLS DAVID ASSESSABLE FEET: 42 24-205-454-0010-10 1727 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1721. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,476.30 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9108 7 TICE GREG A/DAWN M ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-454-0010-00 1715 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1715. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 1/30/2004 Page 1 of 7 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. 8 HANSON RUSSELL ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24-205-454-0009-00 1705 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1705. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.0473 9 WRIGHT MICHAEL ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-454-0006-20 1699 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1699. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441-236 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 10 KUHAREVICZ SANDRA ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-454-0006-10 1693 BEIDLER COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1693. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 11 JONES ERICA ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-454-0006-00 1687 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1687. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 12 BATKAALAN M ASSESSABLE FEET: 55 24-205-435-0012-00 1669 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1669. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,933.25 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.5023 13 CASTANON GREGORIO/MARIA ASSESSABLE FEET: 75 24-205-435-0011-00 1657 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1657. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441-481 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,636.25 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.4122 14 WOTLI DAVID H ASSESSABLE FEET: 35 24-205-435-0010-00 1724 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1651. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,230.25 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.5924 1/30/2004 Page 2 of 7 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. 15 BOSSE STEVEN/FERGUSON JE ASSESSABLE FEET: 55 24-205-435-0009-00 1641 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1641. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,933.25 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.5023 16 1635 BEIDLER LLC ASSESSABLE FEET: 55 24-205-435-0008-00 1635 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1635. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,933.25 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.5023 17 SISSON DALEE ASSESSABLE FEET: 47.5 24-205-434-0012-10 1607 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1607. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,669.63 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.1611 18 FAIRBANKS LARRY O/SANDRA ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-434-0011-00 16082 ROBBINS RD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1593. BEIDLER ST GRAND HAVEN Ml 49417 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 19 ANDERSON RUSSELL J ASSESSABLE FEET: 30 24-205-434-0010-00 1589 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1589. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,054_50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3649 20 KAMP THOMAS R ASSESSABLE FEET: 82.5 24-205-434-0009-00 17550 WOODLAND LN COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1573. BEIDLER ST NUNICA Ml 49448 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,899.88 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.7534 21 BEALL WILLIAM J ASSESSABLE FEET: 82.5 24-205-434-0008-00 4446 BIRCHWOOD CT COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1561. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,899.88 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.7534 1/30/2004 Page 3 of 7 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. 22 ANDERSON CLARENCE II ASSESSABLE FEET: 79.5 24-205-456-0016-00 3949 HENRY COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1780. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,794.43 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.6169 23 WINICKI EDWARD/JOANN REVO ASSESSABLE FEET: 65 24-205-456-0001-10 1769 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1766. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2.2s4.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.9572 24 LAPINSKI THEODORE M ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-205-456-0001-00 4635 ROOD RD. COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1752. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2748 25 HAWKINS WILLARD/HAWKINS W ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-453-0015-30 1736 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1736. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 26 SANFORD KENNETH ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-453-0015-20 1724 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1724. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 27 SANFORD KENNETH ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-453-0015-10 2035 HENRY ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1720. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441-304 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: j $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 28 JACKSON DINA GONZALEZ/EER ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24-205-453-0015-00 1714 BEIDLER ST. COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1714. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.0473 1/30/2004 Page 4 of 7 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. 29 DELONG ROBERT E ASSESSABLE FEET: 90 24-205-453-0001-00 711 W DALE AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 711.0 W DALE AVE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,163.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.0946 30 CITY OF MUSKEGON ASSESSABLE FEET: 85 24-205-436-0017-20 933 TERRACE ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1668. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49442 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,987.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.8672 31 0 CONNOR DONNA M TRUST ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-436-0017-10 1721 FRANKLIN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1664. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 32 HERSHEY JOSEPH F ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-205-436-0017-00 1650 BEIDLER COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1650. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198 33 MULLINS JOHN D ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-436-0004-00 1978 NEVADA ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1644. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441-294 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 34 SECORD HERMAN ET AL ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-436-0003-00 1636 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1636. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 35 SECORD HERMAN ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-436-0002-00 1632 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1632. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 1/30/2004 Page 5 of 7 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. 36 SECORD CHARLES P ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-436-0001-00 1624 BEIDLER COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1624. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P 0. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 37 NELSON COMMUNITY ASSOCIA ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-433-0019-10 P.O. BOX 1638 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1608. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49443-943 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 38 ADAMS IRAD ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-433-0019-00 1600 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1600. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P 0. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 39 BROCKMYRE DAVID ET AL ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-433-0020-00 17753 168TH AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1596. BEIDLER ST SPRING LAKE Ml 49456 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 40 JP MORGAN BANK ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-433-0021-00 4708 MERCHANTILE DR N COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1590. BEIDLER ST FORT WORTH TX 76137 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 41 PRICE SHELLY ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-433-0004-00 1580 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1580. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 42 PHINNEY WENDY S/PHINNEY H ASSESSABLE FEET: 82.5 24-205-433-0002-00 1574 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1574. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,899.88 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.7534 1/30/2004 Page 6 of 7 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. 43 LUNA JOSE L ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25 24-205-433-0001-00 1560 BEIDLER COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1560. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767 SUM OF ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE: 2198.00 SUM OF ESTIMATED P.O. COST: $77,259.70 I TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE PARCELS 43.00 1/30/2004 Page 7 of 7 ,.-_-__ ._. '' ".'·'.·- ;··>; ·. •' ' . SF>ECIALA~SESSMENT < .' . .·. ·.....·· .·•. ·,• , '. . , , · . , , HEARING RESPONSE CARD • , ,, NO RE$PONSE, COUNTS AS ''IN FAVOR" Of PROJECT-To have.your vote count, please .: · . · Return This Gard By' F8BRIJARY; 10, 2004, · __ • · · . · · ·· · : ...' "' ;· i::rojedfNuh)be~;,:c;;, H1577 ;:, _:. ::;?tt•:;,f tit(,::' .>>i;) •?/'., .{,:,l:r:· :·,·~: ' ;• ;'.: ; ' '·.' :' '. :;' ' '. ,.P,rpjectJfltJE1: ,' , ' BE_IDLER ST.: LAKETON A,'?E: ,JO S9l)THERN AVE,, - , ·, ,,.;, .:,· •. _·; f_ .. ,_._,_,,. ·•''•,;o:,YT"·-~;. }.'-)t/{'.- ,_ · _c_':;;c·.;'c ' , .. , l't , , • ., 't, ,--;"c· i:,\< r, 0 ' ';c',•:<f/t ( :-/t,;_;.:-;<: ' • ,c, •¥00 DO NOT SENCll IN THIS• t;;ORM Y.Qt,18:V E COW . ' ''I 'FAVOtf''()li ". ,,, < .' . ~/:· - ~'.•,'.:'• ,~r~~:ii~tri;!tlihf C • c/< ,,c: c•• ; >' ;, ' ' :: , , . • • • i,"'::: i:ri~( ' SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by maii, simply fold on Hie dotted iint::s so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2596 W SHERMAN BLVD Parcel Number 24-205-686-0008-00 Assessab!e Frontage: $105.50 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,708.33 Property Description Cit>{ C\etl'-5 Ottice CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOTS 8 AND 9 BLK 686 ANDS 1/2 OF ADJ VAC ALLEY ABUTTING SD LOTS Your vote COUNTS! I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED 0' Owaec ~4:;c,owae</Spoose JP'[/,11/o, Signature _ ____...._....,,.,_______ __ Signature Address ..?_,-?4 Ju ~ .:9u'rv14r1. B)vli Address $'{6 le). SJ?r>r- • •.::.,,.'if;_·•t: .t.,-r... ,! '.'' • ' ,I,;• •, "·t·ST> : · ' :: ,:/,..,, ·. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ,;,ri:,;.,. . . . , HEARING RESPONSE CARD . R~~fQNSl:.C(?Uf'.:JTSAS "IN FAVOR'',9FPROJECT-To have your vote count, please . . , . . :c;• i /;}i',:k'•>;: •; ~-~IurnJtjis C~rd By, fE!3RUARY 10, 2004 . ·· · :-.(/;·'.:(:.frb).~-~i~i1rn~it:'.ttL:t:1}q77 •·. . :· ·· ·.·• . .. . s,,.•· ·cc'•:ProjectTitle~ /::',;'.,i/J3~1pLE~.ST,,.LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. f ik: ';{J!!: ~rtlt:~t~":~:~:~ t: ·• · ··•.· •· . ·.·· i:(.j:,)•:\\:lfy9y_W}.Sh to h_ave youry;rit\env,ote h1clud~_d a~p;,rt of the tabulation of votes forwarded to ;;{ {,.·_;, )l)e};1ty Comm,ss,on forJhe :ichedul~q pybhc hearing, please return this card by the date :,\'{/:.;;, 1 111d(ca,ted ;above. To .use tt1.isrespQnse carq please Indicate whether you Oppose or Favor ,)' \):::/.Jl)i(speicial asses.sment project; sign 'theJorm a_nd retllrn it to the City Clerk's Office. To ; ,;:::: ','Ft, ',,fetyrn this card by mail; simply fold on 111.f dotted lines so Iha oddrese on th\! reverse 1<irli:i is ;' fr:"\:,, show,ng. Be sure to seal a the.Jorm·with sma.11 piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF ':iN,:!/C','yo(J bo NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR'' OF i.J,':?,•;i PROJECT, ' '/ : '\ ,< :.· . '',' .; . ' . ' ,-}:' '.'.·:c ' •: Assessment Information • · . ;;,! ·: >-k:;c··.<.·:::_::_·,.:. :\.;.,_ ·..--:-\::::·: :,-.-· t·-· · . · RECEIVED ::,>.•.\ ,: Property Address: · · , 1721 BEIDLER ST CITY OF MUSKEGON (i[j;'.tt{j:;i}pa~c;{H~~;er ...... i ... , 24-205-454-0010-10 ·• FEB 1 0 2004 ,,.,,::. •' "-<'. 1 Assessable Frontage· . ·,.·,,.·· .42 Feet ··, \:(,r(;\;c{ ::·•. ' .•,;· :·,,.,r,!;; •.\, '; ' ,, ,. '•,· ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ;,;• :sx:: E~ti/11ated Front Foot Cosf<-,~\\(::·,.;:.>.,:. ~;_'.'.;_-.::\1/}\/\/·;·:.;·,. _;•/"\1··· ,. ,,..,,,•i·· ,'· , . 1 ·. $35.15.•. :iffi/:" :.·..., . -: >>·,.'.•\;' 1 per'foot 4\ (_yt, l ','> .·., .... ·-:· ::) . ;, ·:_:,. <:} '\)' .ESTIMATED JC)TAL COST: ;:\ ,: . ,· : $1,476,30 t!tlitif~~j~~{l~~!J~",.\~~~ :·· .· :,•i'.! ,•;.:y,:;~LY47Fr'OFN82F1LOTS10&11 .. :,·,•·:.ii'.,.•/ ,.,,,,.,, ·' - •I. ".: f. l~Bit~lii:{~{!ift~*~~~ii,tsb9Nrsr- . ··=--~~---~-----~~ ::.:;r::,\\.,i'j,iJ~:;,~ ~ote either in i.{Jij/~/ opposed ~o tt:,e $pecial Assessmerit StreetPaving Project. ~l~ct6~,;~;l? {\i ~K~[lfi!:';JJWL;c ~["{,i-:' ~!ti~t;; ;~,.f)a,C,-l6L,,' >·· ·-·~ .. jxL I AM OPPOSED t1;~flti,i .. .til;EZPi:T ;:;:.~ ----------- CoOwn6r/Spol.lse · (;·_{-\·.\::_>:,'\_·/<./t;{'\/•:.; · ,. _. · ,···Y•·--· ~ ·:;.= ,··..,, ·,;•·:, ·,_ . .;·· ,, ·: ·•.• · .,... ;:,;; '·:\':; \'Thank you fo( taking 1,heJime to vote on thlS 11]1pOrtant issue. ' . 6 . , ·r .•. ,~ .. ,. ...... ,. ,_. >c\1r ;c.,,r,rf'.k ,Ye~ 0 ;:, i:'.~i~f:.i~~~T~~,t'2sJP~~i~~~lR[j(; .: •,,i·,. . ;r•?i?t;H , . . . . .'.·.,·;· · · · · ·. .·•.·•.·•··.·.·.•··.••;:.Ni R···•.E·$.rON.·t.E . •·.•.•···•.···.c·••·<·.p·········LJ ...T.·•.·.··.··.s·.A.•······•.··.•..S . . ·.•·N.· . ....·.•.·.o ..•. .•. . .•.•.: ·.·.'·•·N· · · · · · F·)·•· .· · .·.A.•v.·.· .• ·.·.·.•··R . ·•···•.·.·.·.1.·...·.•...•..•. JpCT,.··.T.•.·.·.·.·.•.o.· · · ·.I.·.h•.a.·.·.v.•·. .·.e.• . ••.•.·.•···your\1ot.e··countpple~!:!j'·· . . >···. .() P.·.•.•·.·.•.R.·•.·•····.0 F.·.·.•······...... ... :<'./tiI¾,t:?_::~:tw:1~l\t{ ,-,_-· .''- !J:,r!~ ~~~,s~,il~i1,ifi~,.;r , :·:;:'!(. j~. 0 JW• .. ···y ... , ..c') SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please f~eturn This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1577 Project Tifie: BEIDLER ST, LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card cy rnaii, simply ioid on the dotted iir1c,s so ii 1e adu1 e5s 01·, ti..,e reve1·se s;ds :s showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information RECEIVED FEB OCl ·1nn1, City Clerks Office CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 BLK 435 LOT 10 You~ vote COUNTS 1 . • Please ,ate elthec lo f°'cc ot opposed to the Special Assessmeot Stteet P"P(T't I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED · Owner s_._.-_''"' "" Address @±~ 2___..________ ___ · .,.,,:;.'--'1----....,..----- CoOwner/Spouse Slgoam - - - - - - - - - - - - Address 14 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ·. HEARING RESPONSE CARD );r,iQ .•·-•. RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, ••, ' ' ' . ' -_ . . . please j;ctlf,N\'tL. ,, ,. . ___ ·. Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 ,/:CiProJect Nllmber: . H 1577 i'.~~;Rigif~fJitle;: , . ~EIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. 1 ' ;(,/}Rf?i~?tDe~criplion .·. · RECONSTRUCTION ·it~i::~:r .. ..... . •.. .. . . ..· ... . ..•.... .. '\\){you, vvish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded le;>, , JJl'J.e ;city Commission forthe scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the.date · ·_ lct;jir!gJi;ated above. To use this. response ,card please indicate whether you Oppose orFayor ''1Z%i(tfifspElcial assessmeritproject, sign the fpnnandJeluff) it I<> the City Clerk'!i ,Office/Jo_,. ()ireturn •1•f,.,.", •_ • I_'• this Cc!rd by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address orHhe reverse side . ,;, • ,', .,•, ' ', _' . • • • ,' ;• , , • ' . ·, , ' ·:' , _' • "., • •C , , •;,_', ' '. ,:, ,. is ,.' '"'.••' j\~tiowing. _. Be sure .to seal the_ form with. a small_ piece· of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF .\ ·•.· •!:Ypqoo NQTSEND INTHIS FORM YOURVOTECOUNTSAS "IN FAVOR"OF ..... ,.· ];\"QJECT. ;. < ,)k~,f~.~~sment ln~ormation b I\'-l (:._ fv, I L I ~- .S RECEIVED FtB (\ O ';liO!t \ City Clerks Office L---~~-~~•"-- . J,CIJYOFMUSKEGON ' E\!ISED.PLAT OF .1903 lKA35.,;> ,: 'or;10:" .. SPECIALASSESSMENT .HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPON~ECOUNTS AS "IN FAVOR'' OF PROJECT-To hc1ve your vote count, please . · Return This Card By FEl3RUARY 10, 2004 . Project Number: ·.. • H 11577 . RECEiVED -·. - _, '. · .· Pro)!:lctTitle: · · · .sE10L.ERsr,,tAKEToNAVE. tosollrHER.N.Av FEB 09 200~ . . Project[:>esqripUon . REC.Q~STRUcn:16N/ '.qJtyClerksOffioo . .If yolJ···\/1/iSh.·to havJy6tJr'N~itten.~6(eiric!Ucled 1s. partofthe •. tabulation··of·.votes forvvard e.d.·to .. the City..COIT1!71iS~ion forthe schedµled)pupli<:: hearir:ig,please returr:i this card by the date .... . indicaJed. a.boye./To.yse thi{resporn,e casclpl~as.e.iildicatewhetheryou.Oppose Favor. or tffo> sp§cia.la~:,e§~JTJEJl)tprojefl, signJhe.fprJTJ ·ahd.r!:llWnjt tothe C:ityClerk'S Offipe.·.• To. ./.. · rEJll.lrn this <::a.rd ~y rnail, sirnpfyfpldpn thf.dotte.dJ.ines so the adclress9n•lh$ . revEip,El :,iqe· is showing. Be S\)reto seal u,¢. forrnwith fl. small piece ot tape or staple pripr to JTJa Uir:ig, .1 F.• ·• · YOU.DONOTSEND.IN THISFORM•YOURVOTECOUNTSAS"IN FAVOR''.OF ~~s~~~grrit1AiorrhatiOr1····.· . < t('.}. St/···· \ > .· > ····· PropkrtyAddr$s~: < •· .. ,. Hi:33ElEIDLERSl" . P;rc~I kiG~hkr { .. .... ·• \ 14{f6iid5t()()10-:fo . . AsiJii~b,~ ~rbnta~~D /if···· ·1:=~et,··· · Ft8nl Fobtdo;l: ··. · · ii:t3s.1s•.· •··. ·•. ifti~ated r~rf;~t ... est1MATE[) 'l"bfALtio~t i>. ~r~p~~y b~sdripi'lon·· ... . . CITY & MUS!<~6q~ / < HEVISE.DRLATOF 1903 ·. •· · ·. BLK4.54 ·.. ·...... · .. . s.41 FT LOTS.10 &T1 . .•·· . ;;};:\' \: ·• <.•. . . i. /(..·· . ·.·. Your voteCOUi\/TS( ···p1easffvoteeithe(inravorOroppOi,ed to··the Sped~! Asse~~.tnentStreet. Paving .ProjeGf. . . .·.•. LAM)~ FA00R I l . · . ..· . .. . .. I A~OPPOSEo lxl ·. <w~:::~r<f ' -, ' '' ., ', '. . - ;·,<,.- __-.:__ - ' ' ~~~~; ¢i8,,~~~r,~·.'. 1 ,,.,,,..,,_ · . Addre~sff~~;ilii41/✓_Rif·••·r• .f\8tire~s ,>;<'spgc1ttissE·ssrv11=Nr.s•·••·•··•. . . . \ /·.·•·······••FlEARINCrRESPdNSE.GA~tJ.< .·.·.····.·.;.x .••.•. i <'>··.•··•······>• ......·.· > i • · •. . ggspqNsE CPlJNJS As '.'JN FAYOR?OF PRQ.Jl;QT-1):>h;iye youtyqte.cqutit; pleii~e ·i~ii~~!iil*~t;r!t:c~i~,ili 9t~d61~J!~!1!1ii~:tt~fl~%~R,iii!i~sg~~t~!fI~}.;;··:•·.· ;;.i .u~~ ? .,. . . . ... ed,a~ov~\irro !1,i,ity tf:i[s. r~sppns$i!J..~a~d pleqse faqJcate ~hether:you Oppose or Favqr '., · pec1al assessment project, sign tn.eform anq return it fa the ·p~r,c(l?Y iJ;i1;iil, .tpls t.~e ro,~.: . :. · . · . simply}old on tfj~Jlottec:tiioes'so fhe ad~ress ~m Clerk'fi Office. reyerse 'side is :, · · . r. ing,.~ li!E($,Ure Jo seal Jtie forn:f with a small piece Rf.tape or staple prior to. mailing. 11'1 : · .~1!'€1 dN• J. ... . ·. . . . " }~lfi j~;j,;;.;i~i.;~~ .0R''.JDF/ ) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD . NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS 0IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please . Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 . ProjectNumber: ·. H 1577 projec;tJitle: ·. BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. Project Des~ription . RECONSTRUCTION .•. INSTRUCTIONS .• you If wish to have your wriUt;!llVOte .included as partof the tabulation of votes forvvarded to the. Pity Commission for the scheduledpuhlic h.earing, please return thi~ card. by the date ·. i11di.pated;::1bove. To US(;! this rnsponse card pleasejndic;ate whet~er you Opposeor Favor · . this special assElsSmentproject, sign the form and retwn itto th(;! City Clerk'sOffice. To .. returnthi~ carq bymail, shnply fqld on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to.seal the form with a small piece oftape or staple prior to mailing. IF .. •• YOUDO NOTSEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS"IN FAVOR" .OF ·. PROJECT.. . . . . . . . .. . . . . AssessmentlnforhlaUon . Prnp~rty•Addte;s:. 1724. BEIDLER ST Parcel. Number 24c;2Q5-453c0015-2Q · . AssessJb1e fronla(le: 46 ··• • . Feet . E~timated FrontFoo!Cost: . $35,15 ••· pefFo()t ESTl~ATED• forAL·cosr $1,406,0() ·.. f'rbpertvbe~cription .• CITY OF MUSKEGON . REVISED PLAT OF.1903 N 40FT OF S 80 FT ·. LOTS.15,16 8LK453 Your.vote COUNTS! .'·7;~:::ztfVS'Toppqsed tofue:,,,,,,Mses;:::::::;1r •. .'.,· ·.P ' .- : . . - . Owner . . . . . . . ·.. .•• . . . .. . CoOwner/Spouse SignJtureSJ:f:r-4W1• ik-@.Gl; · Signature·.· . ;..·.-- .. .;......;.....__.;....._____.......;.....____ Address g,A).(IDWQTLI . Addr~ss ·.... ··•.· .....·•. ··. ·.• •.... •·· •....· ... · > .. ·•· · •· Than·k· youM .. . . .· ··.. . ..•····.·1.2 .... ·. • ;~tlfJuMl!llo vote onthis ·... ·.. . •.· . ·. ··. . .· .. ·. . ·.. .· 1ffl~ ··· . MUSKEG0!'1I; Ml · kl . im.portant issue.. D~.c\/JPY'l.·.£l. 49441 26 ' ,- ;·.. . -, - . . DAVI0WOTLI 1724BEIDLER . iJii11 IC-llCnt"'\M ft.JU AOAA1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please ReturnThis Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004. Project Number: H 1577 ·. . ... Project TiUe: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. .Project . Description RECONSTRUCTION ·. · INSTRUCTIONS . . I.f you wish to have your wriUen vote)ncluded as part of.the tabulation of votes forwarded to· .. _the City Commission for the scheduled pubii? hearing, please return this card by the date indicated ab9ye. To use thi,sresponse card ple~seindicc1te w.hetheryou Opposeorfavor ·, this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the CitY Clerk's Office. To ) •·...• . retumthis. card. by rn1:lil, simply fold on the dotted !lnes so the address on the, reyf;lrse side is a showing. Be sure to seal the form with small piece. of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOURVOTE C()UNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF · PROJECT, . ··... ·· ..· -•· . . . . . •• Assessment Information . . •• .. ' • •,a : .. - - ' . PropertyAddress; 172OBEIDLER ST . Parcel Number . 24-205~453-0015-10 Ass1;1ssable Fr611t~ge: .4o · Feet . ,, ' . Estimated Fmnt Foot Cost: . ··. .. .$35:15. · per Foot ESTIMATED fo;AL COST . ·$J,406.00 Property .D~scription - - ,• CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF.1~03 . BLK 453 N 40 FTOF S 1.20 FT LOTS 15& 16 .Yourvote COUNTS!·. Please vote eitherjn favor or opp()$~~ to th~ Special Assess~ent Stre~t Paving Pro'ect • . .. ;AM IN FAV()RJ <I . .· . I AM OPPOSED . ' . - Owner .. · . · ·.•· ..·• DAVID WOTLI . . . lill:l!BEIOL!l'I •·. · ·. ·. Co0wner/Spouse .· •..•·. •·· ·. ·. Q i • .,.· • .·.·•.··· >l<'ll;>JD. •· ...· ·•· . . Signature•··· MIJSKEG?~, .• . Signc1ture •· '11U~<'-t~:oz-l.,/ · · ·. .·. · ·~l,,JoAT'l..f2A '· .· . .· .... ·. ' /1,f/ 4,94 ~ I .. Atjdr~ .· . . . ·· Address . Thank you for taking the time to vote on this importantissue., · ·• . .. . .. 27 DAVIDWQTLI DAVIDWOTLI 1724BEIDLER 1724BEIDLER MUSKEGON, Ml 49441 MUSKEGON, Ml49441 SPECIALASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "I.N FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By . FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project.Number: H1577 Project Title: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE.TO SOUTHERN AVE. Project Description·• . RECONSTRUCTION · •.. ·. INSTRUCTIONS . lfyou wish to have yourWritien vote.included aspart ofthe tabulation of votes forwarded to . the qity Commission forthe scheduled publichearing, please return this cwd by the date indicated above, Jo use this n:isponsElcard please ir)dicatewhether you Oppose or Favor. this spetial assessme.nt.pmject,sign the form and retum jt to the City ClerWs Office. To ·. return tt1is card by .mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address pn the reverse side is showing .. 8El sure to seal the form Witn a small. piece of.tape or staple prior to mailing. IF·· I YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS\\FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF I PROJECT. Assessment Information •·•)'.. . ' . ' 1 Property Address: • ,-,i 1766 BEIDLER ST .• ·.· .) ' . ' . ' ·,· ,' --..:. ----: _. ' - . Parcel Number .-·-:; · 24-205~456-0001°10 RfCEfveo-i/ .· . Ass~s~ablEl Frontage: . ·. 65 feet' · ·•.·. F€B OIJ?qn}" j, • EstirnatedFrontFootCost:. ·. . · $35.15 •· perfoot Cityc/erk.s , 0'"'1·. .·/• . ,,Jee- _-\ ESilMJ\"TED TOTAL cos+·.. . $2,284.75 ; ,' _, ~~..- : . i i' Property D~scription •··•.. , ,, ' - ' . '' ·. ' .. . ¢IT\' OF MU$KE<,ON REVISEDPLAT OF 1903. · S 65 FT LOTS 1-2. BLK.456 ' ' ---<-i6ut- vote :couftrs+\.. ·-~ ; Please.vote , - -. eitherinfavuror -_ - I _.- - opposedto . ,. - ·. the Spedal . . - . Assessment - ·--- - ', itreet Paving Project. ·-·•· . JAM INFAVo.RJ 1 •...·. •·· 1.AMOPPOSED ~ Owner :/JQw:dAvJ-0.:JJv CoQwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ . . . - - '.·. 'Signature . f#tvY (f-6U~o!,> . 7 ignat~reJ¼~t;,t\, G,e)._/4~~/i,0.·.··•· · Address · ·• .· / f:J. (., (~,11,oS.~V: <}, Jl.ddress . ' / fJC Dvc½-F:t:~;1}}f:, ·. ' Thank)iQU for taking the time tovote oh this important iss~e, ' 23 , SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please . Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 ProjectNumber:. · H 1577 Project Title: · BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. · · · Project Description.• RECONSTRUCTION\ ·INSTRUCTIONS . If yqu Wish to have your written vote inducted ~$ p~rt oftheJabulation of votesJorwarded to the Cjty Commission for the scheduled public hearing, plepse return this card by the di=lte ·- indicated above. ro use this respopse card please indicate y.,hether you Opposeor Fpvor. this special assessment project,sign theform 9r,d return itto tt7e City Clerk's Office. To .. .. return this Cc)rd by mail, simply foid on the dotted lines sothe address on the reverse side is show!pg. Be sure to seal the tormwith.a small piece oftape or staple priorto mailing. IF · . i~g:iiiforsEr~ INTtJIS fORMYQURVOTECOLJNJSAS "IN FAV.OR" PF Assessment Information . .· Propertyl\ddr~ss:· .·.1755 BEIDLER ST . Parcel Number . 24.'.205-455-00()8;00 Ff€CE7VEIY7 .·•Asses;able Frohtage: 41.25 · Feet FEB o1:; 2nrl/, / E~timatectFrnnt Foot Cost: $35.15 · perFoo( c· ·.•.• ... ·. ··. , lty Clerks O.tt:·., ice./ I · ESTIMA+Eo TOTAL cosT ·• $1,449.94 .. Prbp~rt?oescriptioh ~1rv ot MUSKEGON .... REVISED PLATOF 1903 BLK455 . N1/2LOJ6 Your Vote COUNTS! .. lt .... . •· . ·-• .. . PleaseVoteeitherjn favor~~ opposed to thesieci;,I Assess;ent Street Paving Project. .· . . ·• ·. I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED . · ~ ·.· . . .~;:::"ie .• · ~ .G60w;::;::,~z,~~,> Address ·. )9f cex~'(} Pi:'; > ·, .. · · Address . xi,tk# ¢1-v~ d • ff, . · Th:rnk you fortaking thetirneto vote on this important issue.· ,,, n '"''"'~> ·. ·. 3 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By . FEBRUARY 10, 2004 · Project Nurriber: . H t577 .· ..· ·. . ·.· ·•· .· ·.. · . . · · .... · · . ·.·.. Project Title: . . BEl()LER ST., LAKETON AVE. T0SOUTHE;N AVE. • . ProjecfQes6ripti9n . REGPNSTRLJCTION .... . INSTRUCTIONS. ·... If you wish to have your writtenvoteinduoed 9Spartof the tabul.ation of votes fotwarded to the City Commission for.the scheduled publi? hearing, please return this card by tge date .indicated above, to.u!:lethis responsecwd pleas~.indici:ltewhetheryou.()ppose or Favor . this special f;lSSessmentproject,signthe form and return.it to the C::ity Clerk's Office .. ·To return this card by mail; sin1ply fold on the dottedJines S() the address on the reverse side is sho\>lljng .. Be sure to seal theJormwith a sma.11 piece of tape orstaple prior.to rnaiiing. lF YOU DONOTSEND INTHIS FORMYOURVOTE COUNTS AS ''IN FAVOR" OF ~~s~~;~:htlnformatioh .·• > / . ·.•· . •·•. ··.. . PropenyAddreis:' . 176~ E3Elb½E~ ST .... Parcel Numb~/ · ·•· 24,205-455-0008·1 _,. o ___ - ' ' ', .· Asses~~ble Front;ge:'. ... 82.5, >Fe~(·. · FEB Oti 2nnf Esti~ated FrontFoofCC>it: ' •.· ',_ _"; -·, $35.15 ',_._:·.- . ,peri=oot ' ,·, ',_ 01 Clerks Office · ·esr1~ATED T()TAtbdsr ·. .· · ·.•·. $;,899'.88 ·••·. . ~~--:.J .·. Prop~rty De~c~iptiCJrr. .· CIT\' OF MUSKEGON . REVISED PLAT OF 1993 . BLK 455 . s 1/2 LOT B. ·YoL1rvote60UNisf · Please vote either infavoforopposedto the Special Assessment StreetPaving Project.·.. •. · lAMJNF:YoRJ/i1; • . 1AMo~to?tD ~J O~ner • < ~/Jl!/)4 . ·. • CCJ0wner/$po~se·,..·.;.··r::-~:;,:;;;;:;.~~~~=""':,;- Sigratur<1 ~7flk¼8~~·.... ·~.igni:l_ture ~ •·.····•.·.v1: .......•..•.·. ,.........·•.•.· / 0 ~ .· .. ·· .. Address /9/)6 ~ y { - .•. .•..· ·. <;d~ress · ,(ffe,?<~1J c:16~ Thank you fortak1ng the time.to vote on this important issue. . ,.,,.• "'' »,c,,,,,·r• · . . 2 .. ·PIJ II :nrr::mewwnouw:'1u;;1-w ,ii' To: Evelyn/Engineer Department From: Rick Anderson I 780 Beidler Muskegon, Ml 49441 Date: February 6, 2004 Re: Project H 15 77 Beidler@ Laketon Ave to Southern Ave Reconstruction We did not receive a "Hearing Response Card". We called the Engineer Department to request a card but got the answering machine. Please note that I am OPPOSED to the Special Street Paving Project. Owner:,_..:-:C=--c...._.,_r--'' --J.A_J__.JCV\.."'1Jlod.:=t.1..~:cw>~c..1£1,:1...>.......-'l~(_ _ _ __ Signature: C . ~ ~ ✓et > bA l( RECEIVED CITY OF MUSKEGON FEB O6 200~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT i \· ) . r,. ,., Date: February I 0, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Engineering RE: Public Hearing Create Special Assessment District for: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR .. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of the McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR., and to create the special assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the attached resolution COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: go---·~ H-1561 MCCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. PROPERTY OWNER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TABULATION FEET PERCENTAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS - 75 FOR OPPOSE LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET LETTER#ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE 4404.890 50 2458 MCCRACKEN 24-210-002-0006-00 60.00 59 2319 GREENWOOD 24-035-400-0001-01 83.63 11 2471 MCCRACKEN 24-205-649-0003-00 89.08 60 2326 GREENWOOD 24-205-620-0001-10 5.30 FRONT FEET OPPOSED 1161.46 26.37% 63 2006 HARDING 24-205-639-0008-10 33.00 75 2085 LAKESHORE 24-205-636-0007-00 61,88 RESPONDING FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 149.080 3.38% 73 2104 MCCRACKEN 24-205-636-0009-00 66.00 32 2169 MCCRACKEN 24-205-642-0001-00 45.00 NOT RESPONDING - FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 3094.350 70.25% 70 2204 MCCRACKEN 24-205-638-0007-00 41.00 69 2218 MCCRACKEN 24-205-638-0006-00 35.15 TOTAL FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 3243.430 73.63% 64 2272 MCCRACKEN 24-205-639-0008-00 / 66.00 20 2355 MCCRACKEN 24-205-647-0001-00 71,70 56 2382 MCCRACKEN 24-395-002-0002-00 50.00 17 2409 MCCRACKEN 24-205-648-0001-00 58.50 12 2465 MCCRACKEN 24-205-649-0002-00 44.54 49 2472 MCCRACKEN 24-210-002-0004-00 70.60 48 2480 MCCRACKEN 24-210-002-0003-00 45.00 47 2488 MCCRACKEN 24-210-002-0002-00 50.00 10 2493 MCCRACKEN 24-205-649-0005-00 89,08 8 2521 MCCRACKEN 24-205-650-0002-00 81.54 40 2538 MCCRACKEN 24-210-001-0001-00 41.00 3 2563 MCCRACKEN 24-779-001-0002-00 44.54 29 2075 MINER 24-205-643-0001-00 45.00 67 2026 MORTON 24-205-638-0009-00 33.00 Z} "' ""'"' . t.,, ~ -k d ,j "2 D ~ 0 ---.;:::, " ~I ~ ·c Q..,. ~ CL ~ ~ ~ "'..',.::;· Q_ "- "'d -a ""- 0 0 Z2-= cc._. -£;, e r ~,!_ '"- C ·~ ~ 1 :J --~' ~ ' ¥ .s ~ 7 < co di' C!} i -e °) 1 149.08 <::j, 116j.46 1TALS ti "'i ~ ~ -,J -, ·2 C ~ ' ;J" " ' ""~ ) -~·' ~ -' ~ < j ' ' = a ~ ..,s •_y_'1 /'G ,>__,. ~ ~ <: C ~) , . V $ < '"' "<. "-· '! ) A 0 >-- -cJ s ; j ~ -1" ? J c· 0 / j .- ci ,J (j c, ~ \.., • C. cQ <L -;)._j c:d '7 :;;: 0 /r-::: 9 <:.. S c:..,._ \l ~-") --:1 i :;:., h ·"'i ,,"' C ~'! ,,,, '"' ("> ;: ~ __.;. ~ ' 5 -.', J -"t, V, - :'1 ,..:;< i C 3 rz; cl l<J ~ '-.)- ..., 0 :6 '} lD r, c;.- 2 -C-3 2 7 iA " C _,y"SQ, ("b ("> c::!.. r{ tle ',~ L C:, ~ ~ ~~ TABULATED AS OF: 04:30 PM ,:"' p "' _;} \0 ® ~. ~~/ :--{,~ ,:i (D' ~: t. I~ 0, ~ 1._, c:'..J 2/10/20044:30 PMTABULATION OF THE RESPONSES TO THE SP. ' ASS. HEARING ON MCCRACKEN .~ (.:;:;:., :::) ,_; CITY OF MUSKEGON Resolution No. 2004-lB(d) Resolution At First Hearing Creating Special Assessment District For McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Location and Description of Properties to be Assessed: See Exhibit A attached to this resolution RECITALS: I. A hearing has been held on February 10, 2004 at 5:30 o'clock p.m. at the City Commission Chambers. Notice was given by mail and publication as required by law. 2. That estimates of costs of the project, a feasibility report and valuation and benefit information are on file with the City and have been reviewed for this hearing. 3. At the hearing held February 10, 2004, there were 26. 37 % objections by the owners of the property in the district registered at the hearing either in writing received before or at the hearing or by owners or agents present at the hearing, and the Commission has considered the advisability of proceeding with the project. FINDINGS: 1. The City Commission has examined the estimates of cost to construct the project including all assessable expenses and determines them to be reasonable. 2. The City Commission has considered the value of the property to be assessed and the value of the benefit to be received by each property proposed to be assessed in the district after the improvements have been made. The City Commission determines that the assessments of costs of the City project will enhance the value of the properties to be assessed in an amount at least equivalent to the assessment and that the improvement thereby constitutes a benefit to the property. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The City Commission hereby declares a special assessment district to include the property set forth in Exhibit A attached to this resolution. 2. The City Commission determines to proceed with the improvements as set forth in the feasibility study and estimates of costs, and directs the City Engineer to proceed with project design, preparation of specifications and the bidding process. If appropriate and if bonds are to be sold for the purposes of financing the improvements, the Finance Department shall prepare plans for financing including submission of application to the Michigan Department of Treasury and the beginning of bond proceedings. 3. The City Commission hereby appoints a Board of Assessors consisting of City Commissioners Davis and - - Larson --------- and the City Assessor who are hereby directed to prepare an assessment roll. Assessments shall be made upon front foot basis. 4. Based on the City's Special Assessment policy and preliminary estimates it is expected that approximately 25.81 °/4, of the cost of the street improvement will be paid by special assessments. 5. Upon submission of the special assessment roll, the City staff is hereby directed to notify all owners and persons interested in properties to be assessed of the hearing at which the City Commission will consider confirmation of the special assessment roll. This resolution adopted. Ayes Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson Nays None CITY OF MUSKEGON Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk ACKNOWLEDGMENT This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10, 2004. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts-of 1976. CITY OF MUSKEGON By ~Q L Gail A. Kundinger, ClerM ~ EXHIBIT A McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT All properties abutting that section of McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) ss COUNTY OF MUSKEGON ) TO CREATE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FOLLOWING: McCracken St. Sherman Blvd to Lakeshore Dr. THE DEPONENT SAYS THAT THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED UPON EACH OWNER OF OR PARTY IN INTEREST IN PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED IN THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHOSE NAME APPEARS UPON THE LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE BY FIRST CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL, WITH POSTAGE PREPAID, ADDRESSED TO EACH SUCH OWNER OR PARTY IN INTEREST AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON SAID LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS BY DEPOSITING THEM IN AN OFFICIAL UNITED STATES MAIL RECEPTACLE ON THE 30T~ DA Y-0 ~ 2004. GAIL A. KUNDINGER, CITY C RK SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /It-A DAY OF & d ctt a /'L , 2004. ?!' NOTARY P BLIC, MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 2 -r:2S--tl C; LOCATION MAP j ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY For McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. The reconstruction of McCracken street between Sherman & Lakeshore Dr., see attached exhibit, was initiated by the City due to the conditions of the pavement and drainage facilities as well as the need to install a 12" watermain loop between two transmission mains to improve reliability of the water distribution system in that area. The existing pavement has deteriorated to a level where, we believe, a total reconstruction is necessary. This section of road has not had, to the best of our records, any major work since the 1930 and has an average Pavement Condition Index of around 30. The proposed improvements (reconstruction) consist of following; 1. Complete removal of existing pavement and replace with a new asphalt street section that would include curb & gutter and a proposed width of37' back to back. The additional width of one foot might be utilized in the future for a turn lane if the need arises. However, for the time being it would be used for an on street parking where permissible. 2. spot repairs on the existing sanitary sewer main 3. Replace existing watermain along with water services the cost of which is estimated at $300,000 that is not assessable. A memo from the Assessor's office, which addresses the appraisal and benefit information, is attached. The preliminary cost estimate for the work associated with paving is approximately $600,000 with the length of the project being approximately 5227 lineal feet (project length) or 4404 of assessable footage. This translates into an estimated improvement cost of $136 per assessable foot. The assessment figure will be at a cost not to exceed $35.15 per assessable foot as established in the 2004 Special Assessment for this type of improvement MUSKEGON COUNTY wm M C H G A N BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Paul T. Baade, Chair District 10 Bill Gill, Vice-Chair District 8 January 14, 2004 Douglas A. Bennett Mohammed Al-Shatel, City Engineer District 7 City of Muskegon 933 Terrace Street Charles L. Buzzell District 2 Muskegon, MI 49443 James J. Derezinski Mr. Al-Shatel: District 4 In accordance with your request, I have examined the proposed special assessment Marvin R. Engle district entailing the reconstruction of McCracken Street between Sherman District 5 Boulevard and Lakeshore Drive. The purpose of this analysis is to document the reasonableness of this special assessment district by identifying and quantifying any Louis A. McMurray District 9 accrued benefits. It is subject to the normal governmental restrictions of escheat, taxation, police power and eminent domain. The effective date is January 14, Robert Scolnik 2004. District 11 In conclusion, it is my opinion that the special assessment amounts justly and I. John Snider II District 3 reasonably represents the accrued benefits to the properties encompassed by this project. The amounts reflect the sum of the inunediate estimated value Nancy A. Waters enhancement and the intrinsic value that will accrue from an overall increase in District 6 property values due to an improved quality of life created by the proposed project. Stephen R. Wisniewski As previously presented, the proposed special assessment district encompasses District 1 primarily residential properties. The front foot rate of$35. 15 for the reconstruction of the above mentioned project area appears reasonable in light of an analysis that indicates a possible enhancement of$35.76. The conclusions are based upon the data presented within this limited analysis in restricted format, and on supporting information in my files. Sincerely, J~G-½ Vicki A Emery, CMAE 3 Senior Appraiser EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT • 17:J E. M"PLE AVE., BUILDING C • MUSKEGON, Ml 49442 (231) 7:o4-63B6 • FAX (231) 724-1129 TTY /231) 722-4103 • An EEO I ADA I AA Employer recycled paper January 30, 2004 Dear :OWNERS NAME OWNERS ADDRESS & STREET OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE, OWNERS ZIPCODE 1 The City of Muskegon is asking for your support for improvement of the street adjoining your property located at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET. The City of Muskegon believes that by making the proposed street improvements you will have less road noise, dust, and wear and tear on your vehicle. In addition, street improvements provide easier access for delivery of services such as snow plowing, mail delivery, and bus service. Called a special assessment district, the largest percentage of the proposed street improvement will be paid for by the City of Muskegon (via local funds and or grants); however, it will be necessary for you to cover a share of the cost (which you can spread over a period of ten years) based on the amount of property you own bordering the street. A description of the project, including the associated cost to you and the City, is located in the documents attached to this letter. While the City of Muskegon believes that the proposed improvements will result in a safer and cleaner street while adding curb appeal to your property, you do have the right to ask further questions, decline, or protest participation in this particular project. Please carefully review the enclosed materials and call the City's Engineering Department at 724-6707 or your ward commissioner if you require more information. A public hearing is also scheduled for this project on FEBRUARY 10, 2004. If you attend this public hearing you will be given an opportunity to present your questions and potential concerns on the proposed special assessment district to the commission. Also located in this packet of materials is a Special Assessment Hearing Response Card. If mailed back to the City of Muskegon City Clerk's Office before the scheduled public hearing your vote will be added to the tabulation of votes during the public hearing. If you do not send in this form your vote counts as "in favor" of the project. Thank you for your participation in improving the quality of life in the Muskegon community. January 30, 2004 OWNERS NAME OWNERS ADDRESS & STREET OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE OWNERS ZIPCODE 1 Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX: at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET NOTICE OF HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Dear Property Owner: The Muskegon City Commission is considering whether or not to create a special assessment district which would assess your property for the following paving project: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. The proposed special assessment district will be located as follows: All parcels abutting McCracken St.. from Sherman Blvd. to Lakeshore Dr. It is proposed that a portion of the above improvement will be paid by special assessment against properties in the aforementioned district. Following are conditions of the proposed special assessment which are important to you. Public Hearings An initial public hearing to consider the creation of a special assessment district will be held at the City of Muskegon City Commission Chambers on FEBRUARY 10, 2004 at 5:30 P.M. You are encouraged to appear at this hearing, either in person, by agent or in writing to express your opinion, approval, or objection concerning the proposed special assessment. We are enclosing a Hearing Response Card for you to indicate your agreement or opposition to the special assessment. This card includes the property identification and description, assessable footage per City policy, and the estimated cost of the assessment. You may also appear, as above, in lieu of, or in addition to mailing your response card to the City Clerk. Written objections or appearances must be made at or prior to the hearing. NOTE: THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT WILL BE CREATED OR NULLIFIED AT THIS HEARING. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO COMMENT AT THIS HEARING IF YOU WANT YOUR OPINION COUNTED FOR THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. A second public hearing will be held, if the district is created, to confirm the special assessment roll after the project is completed. You will be mailed a separate notice for the second hearing. At this second hearing the special assessment costs will be spread on the affected properties accordingly. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT AGAINST YOUR PARCEL EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THIS HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED AT THE SECOND HEARING, YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE ROLL TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THE INITIAL HEARING OR AT THE SECOND HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY AGENT, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST. By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the properties to be assessed shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement. Estimated Costs The total estimated cost of the street portion of the project is $600,000.00 of which approximately 25.81 % ($154,831.88) will be paid by special assessment to property owners. Your property's estimated share of the special assessment is shown on the attached hearing response card. The remaining costs will be paid by the City. The street assessment, which covers improvements to the roadway, may be paid in installments over a period of up to ten (10) years. Any work on drive approaches or sidewalks will be assessed to the property at actual contract prices and these costs may also be paid in installments over ten (10) years. Please note this work is in addition to the street special assessment. Please refer to the enclosed sheet entitled Special Assessment Payment Options for more information on the payment options and financial assistance programs available. I urge you to return the enclosed hearing response card indicating your preference and to attend the scheduled public hearing. Your views are important to the City and to your neighbors. Additional information, including preliminary project plans and cost estimates is available in the Engineering Department located on the second floor of City Hall. Regular business hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday except holidays. Sincerely, ,,I//' .. / / /·1/-1/; ./ I t/"//411 ~/j/,~ ,Z;,:5 L- (?, Mohammed AI-Shatel, P.E. City Engineer SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX Assessable Frontage: $133.62 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $4,696.74 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON SUB-DIV OF BLK 651 LOTS 4, 5, 6, 26 THROUGH 28, BLK 1 ALSO S 125 FT OF VAC N/S ALLEY ABUTTING LOTS 4, 5, 6AND 28 Your vote COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR • CoOwner/Spouse I AM OPPOSED • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. Signature ----------- Signature ------------- Address Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. CITY OF MUSKEGON STREET H-1561 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. CDBG APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION . Name: Birthdate: Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _ Spouse: Birthdate: Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Address: Phone: Race: Parcel# Owner/Spouse Legally Handicapped Or Disabled? ( )Yes ( ) No (Please refer to your assessment letter for this information) Number Living in Household: List information for household members besides owner/spouse here. Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdate Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _ -_ _-_ _ · .. . INCOME INFORMATION . . ANNUAL Household Income: $ Wage earner: (Must include all household income) Wage earner: Wage earner: Wage earner: Total: $ ' PROPERTY INFORMATION Proof Of Ownership: ( ) Deed ( ) Mortgage ( ) Land Contract Homeowner's Insurance Co: Expiration Date: Property Taxes: ( ) Current ( ) Delinquent Year(s) Due (Property taxes must be current to qualify and will be verified by CDBG staff) . . OWNER'S SIGNATURE Owner's Signature: Date: By signing this application, the applicant verifies he/she owns and occupies the dwelling. The Applicant/Owner certifies that all infonnation in this application, and all information furnished in support of this application, is true and complete to the best of the Applicant/Owner's knowledge and belief. The property owner's signature will be required prior to the application being processed. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER APRIL 15, 2004 . .· . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) DATE CENSUS TRACT NO. SIGNATURE TITLE COMMENTS/REMARKS **ATTENTION APPLICANT** Please see reverse side for instructions on providing proof of income, ownership, and property insurance. CITY OF MUSKEGON STREET- H-1561 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Note: You may receive this application several times - If you have already applied, please discard. Dear Resident: The City of Muskegon has selected the street abutting your property for repairs. To assist homeowners, who may have difficulty paying the cost of street repairs, the City offers assessment waivers through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for eligible households and families. If you meet the CDBG program qualifications, the City may pay the street assessment for you to the extent that funds are available. Application Requirements: ✓ Applicants must submit proof that their total household income does not exceed 65% of Area Median Income (see chart below); Proof of income may include copies of Wage & Tax Statement (W-2's) from the year 2003, pension or other benefit checks, bank statements for direct deposits or agency statements for all household mcome. 2002 65% MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME CHART FAMILY SIZE INCOME LIMIT I $27,885 2 31,850 3 35,880 4 39,845 5 43,030 6 46,326 7 49,400 8 52,585 For each extra, add 3,185 ✓ Applicants must submit proof that they both own and occupy property at the time of application; Land Contract purchasers must obtain approval of titleholder prior to receiving assistance. Proof of ownership should be a deed, m011gage, or land contract; proof of occupancy can be a copy of a d1iver's license or other official document showing both your name and address. ✓ Applicants must submit proof of current property insurance. Please complete the first four (4) sections of the application on the reverse side of this notice, and return it, along with supporting documentation, to: City of Muskegon Community & Neighborhood Services 933 Terrace Street, 2nd Floor Muskegon,MI49440 For further information, please contact this office by calling 724-6717, weekdays from 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The City rese11 1es the right to verify all application i1?/(Jrmation, and to reject any applications that containfals(fied information or insufficient documentation. Special Assessment Payment Options Property owners in the City of Muskegon who are being specially assessed for street, sidewalk or other public improvements may pay their assessment in the following ways: I. Lump Sum Payment in Full Assessments may be paid in full within sixty (60) days of the confirmation of the special assessment roll without interest. II. Installment Payments Assessments not paid within the first sixty (60) days may be paid in installments over several years as follows: Street and Alley Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments. For example, if the amount of your assessment is $850.00, you will be billed $85.00 per year plus applicable interest as described below. Driveway, Sidewalk, and Approach Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments plus applicable interest as described below. Interest- Simple interest is charged at the rate of 5.00% per year unless the City has borrowed money to complete the project for which you are assessed and has pledged you assessments for repayment of the borrowed money. In such cases, the interest you are charged is equal to the interest rate the City must pay on the borrowed money plus 1.00%. Ill. Special Assessment Deferral (Low Income Seniors and Disabled Persons) To qualify for a special assessment deferral you or your spouse (if jointly owned) must: • Be 65 years or older or be totally or permanently disabled. • Have been a Michigan resident for five (5) years or more and have owned and occupied the homestead being assessed for five (5) years or more. • Be a citizen of the U.S. • Have a total household income not in excess of $16,823.00 • Have a special assessment of $300.00 or more. Under this program the State of Michigan will pay the entire balance owing of the special assessment, including delinquent, current, and further installments. At the time of payment a lien will be recorded on your property in favor of the State of Michigan. Repayment to the State must be made at the time the property is sold or transferred or after the death of the owner(s). During the time the special assessment is deferred interest is accrued at the rate of 6.00% per year. IV. Further Information About the Above Programs Further information about any of the above payment options may be obtained by calling either the City Assessor's Office at 724-6708 or the City Treasurer's Office at 724-6720. Applications may be obtained at the Muskegon County Equalization Office in the Muskegon County building or City of Muskegon Assessor's Office in City Hall. V. Additional Special Assessment Payment Assistance Qualified low and moderate income homeowners who are being assessed may be eligible for payment assistance through the City of Muskegon Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Assistance from this program will be available to the extent that funds are available. To obtain further information and determine whether you are eligible, contact the Community and Neighborhood Services Department at 724-6717. CITY OF MUSKEGON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS IN AN EFFORT TOWARDS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT, the Muskegon City Commission is proposing that special assessment districts be created for the following projects: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON A VE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. AND SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. The specific locations of the special assessment districts and the properties proposed to be assessed are: All parcels abutting Beidler St. from Laketon Ave. to Southern Ave. All parcels abutting McCracken St. from Sherman Blvd. to Lakeshore Dr. And All parcels abutting Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln St. to Beach St. The City Commission proposes that the City and property owners by means of special assessments will share the cost of improvement. You may examine preliminary plans and cost estimates in the City Hall's Engineering Department during regular business hours - between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on weekdays, except holidays. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS ON FEBRUARY JO, 2004 AT 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THE HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED (AT A LATER HEARING) YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ROLL'S CONFIRMATION TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THIS HEARING OR AT THE HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY YOUR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST. By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the property to be assessed shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement. PUBLISH: January 31 1 2004 Gail Kundinger, City Clerk ADA POLICY The City will provide necessary appropriate auxiliary aids and services, for example, signers for the hearing impaired, audiotapes for the visually impaired, etc., for disabled persons who want to attend the meeting, upon twenty-four hours notice to the City. Contact: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Ml 49440 (231) 724-6705 or TDD (231) 724-6773 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT H 1561 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 1 THORSEN PAUL D/SHEILA P ASSESSABLE FEET: 133.62 24-779-001-0004-00 3377 WINNETASKA COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2591. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $4,696.74 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.0334 2 ZIMMERMAN RENEE MARIE ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54 24-779-001-0003-00 2571 MCCRACKEN COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2571. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111 3 NELSON EVELYN ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54 24-779-001-0002-00 2563 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2563. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111 4 HOLDEMAN STEPHEN E ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54 24-779-001-0001-00 2011 LETART AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2011. LETART AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441-145 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111 5 HOPKINS JEFFERY L ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54 24-205-650-0006-00 2012 LETART AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2012. LETART AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111 6 FERRIS ROGER L ASSESSABLE FEET: 60.04 24-205-650-0005-00 2533 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2533. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ~'_$_2_,1_10_.4_1~ PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3630 7 FISHER STEPHEN D ASSESSABLE FEET: 36.5 24-205-650-0004-00 2525 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2525. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,282.98 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.8286 1/30/2004 Page 1 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 8 SANFORD IVAN ASSESSABLE FEET: 81.54 24-205-650-0002-00 2521 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2521. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,866.13 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8511 9 LACH CORNELIUS JR ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54 24-205-650-0001-00 2509 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2509. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111 10 FLICKEMA DAVID A ASSESSABLE FEET: 89.08 24-205-649-0005-00 2493 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2493. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,131.16 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.0223 11 BACHELLER GORDON L/JUDY D ASSESSABLE FEET: 89.08 24-205-649-0003-00 2471 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2471. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,131.16 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.0223 12 THEILE RAY ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54 24-205-649-0002-00 2465 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2465. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111 13 MONROE SHARON F ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54 24-205-649-0001-00 2457 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2457. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111 14 NEMETH STACEY ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-205-648-0001-30 2008 CUTLER AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2008. CUTLER AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 1/30/2004 Page 2 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 15 MOBLO SIMON/TIERZA ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-205-648-0001-20 2429 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2429. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 ANDERSON JON D ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 16 24-205-648-0001-10 2427 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2427. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 17 RIPKA VINCENT A ASSESSABLE FEET: 58.5 24-205-648-0001-00 2409 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2409. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,056.28 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3281 18 BUSCH GREGORY S/CHANDRA ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-205-647-0012-00 2389 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @2389. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 19 ROBERTSON KURT A ASSESSABLE FEET: 121.4 24-205-647-0001-10 2365 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2365. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $4,267.21 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.7560 20 COMEAU FRANCIS A ASSESSABLE FEET: 71.7 24-205-647-0001-00 2355 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2355. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,520.26 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.6277 21 VANDENBOSCH DAVID H/ANNE ASSESSABLE FEET: 50.54 24-205-646-0019-00 2331 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2331. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,776.48 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1474 1/30/2004 Page 3 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. NEWMYER EDWARD A ASSESSABLE FEET: 100.5 22 24-205-646-0001-20 880 1ST ST STE 507 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2321. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49440 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,532.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2816 GROOMS REMONE T/TESFAY LI ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 23 24-205-646-0001-10 2311 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2311. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 BURLINGAME DAVID C/KATHY A ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24 24-205-644-0010-00 2287 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2287. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 WAKEFIELD SAMUEL T ASSESSABLE FEET: 100.5 25 24-205-644-0001-10 50 LAKESHORE BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2271. MCCRACKE NORTON SHOR Ml 49444 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,532.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2816 VANDENBERG TRAVIS/STACI ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 26 24-205-644-0001-00 2265 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2265. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 CURCIO PAMELA ANNE ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 27 24-205-643-0023-10 PO BOX 222 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2239. MCCRACKE NUNICA Ml 49448 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 MEDENDORP DAVID ASSESSABLE FEET: 100.5 28 24-205-643-0001-10 PO BOX 298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2223. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST $3,532.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2816 1/30/2004 Page 4 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 29 JOLMAN DANIEL J/JULIE SIUDA ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24-205-643-0001-00 2075 MINER AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2075. MINER AVE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 30 MEDENDORP ERIN ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24-205-642-0019-10 PO BOX 0298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2191. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 31 WAKEFIELD SAMUEL T ASSESSABLE FEET: 100.5 24-205-642-0001-10 50 LAKES HORE BL VD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2175. MCCRACKE NORTON SHOR Ml 49444 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,532.58 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2816 32 KRUZEL ALLISON J ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24-205-642-0001-00 2169 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2169. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 33 LAKESIDE M & G DEVELOPMEN ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24-205-641-0001-40 PO BOX 298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2137. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 34 LAKESIDE M & G DEVELOPMEN ASSESSABLE FEET: 84 24-205-641-0001-30 PO BOX 298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2123. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,952.60 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9070 35 LAKESIDE M & G DEVELOPMEN ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24-205-641-0001-00 PO BOX 298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2111. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 1/30/2004 Page 5 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 36 HOLDEMAN STEPHEN E ASSESSABLE FEET: 85 24-645-000-0005-00 2011 LETART AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1996. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441-145 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,987.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9297 37 2572 MCCRACKEN LLC ASSESSABLE FEET: 102.6 24-645-000-0003-00 6151 RIDGEVIEW DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2572. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,606.39 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.3292 38 HARRIS MARGARET M ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-645-000-0002-00 2564 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2564. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9081 39 VANDENBERG TROY/JACKIE ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-645-000-0001-00 2556 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2556. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9081 40 HEGBLOOM ROBERT G REVOC ASSESSABLE FEET: 41 24-210-001-0001-00 2092 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2538. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,441.15 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9308 41 ADAMS MARTHA J ASSESSABLE FEET: 42 24-210-001-0002-00 2534 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2534. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,476.30 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9535 42 MURPHY JOHN Ill/SUSAN ASSESSABLE FEET: 36 24-210-001-0003-00 2530 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2530. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,265.40 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.8173 1/30/2004 Page 6 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 43 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGI ASSESSABLE FEET: 40 24-210-001-0004-00 7575 HUNTINGTON PARK DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2524. MCCRACKE COLUMBUS OH 43235 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9081 44 PLEIMLING ORPHA/HOFFMAN D ASSESSABLE FEET: 72.4 24-210-001-0005-00 2518 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2518. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,544.86 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.6436 45 0 BRIEN AMANDA ASSESSABLE FEET: 36.2 24-210-001-0007-00 1989 PHILO AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1989. PHILO AVE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,212.43 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.8218 46 ALLEN ROBERT B ASSESSABLE FEET: 42 24-210-002-0001-00 1988 PHILO AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 1988. PHILO AVE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,476.30 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9535 47 CHARLES JASON G ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-210-002-0002-00 2488 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2488. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 48 WILLIAMSON DORIS A ET AL ASSESSABLE FEET: 45 24-210-002-0003-00 2480 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2480. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216 49 ARMSTRONG TODD M ASSESSABLE FEET: 70.6 24-210-002-0004-00 2472 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2472. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,481.59 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.6028 1/30/2004 Page 7 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 50 MOLER SAM ASSESSABLE FEET: 60 24-210-002-0006-00 2458 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2458. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2, 109_00 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3621 51 EISTEDT KENT S ASSESSABLE FEET: 53.6 24-210-003-0001-00 2442 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2442. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,884.04 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.2168 52 CROUCH SCOTT ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-210-003-0002-00 2434 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2434. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 53 SMITH ERIC M/JULIA I ASSESSABLE FEET: 75 24-210-003-0003-00 2428 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2428. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,636.25 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.7027 54 FRONCEK TIMOTHY A ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.5 24-210-003-0005-00 2412 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2412. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,564.18 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0102 55 SMITH ALLENS ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-395-002-0001-00 2392 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2392. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 56 BARNES JUSTIN CNISSER MAR ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-395-002-0002-00 2382 MCCRACKEN COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2382. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 1/30/2004 Page 8 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 57 VARGAS LONNIE L/STACY R ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-395-002-0003-00 2374 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2374. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 58 FLICKEMA DONNA H ASSESSABLE FEET: 85 24-395-002-0004-00 2360 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2360. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,987.75 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9297 59 KURDZIEL PAUL A/RENEE J ASSESSABLE FEET: 83.63 24-035-400-0001-01 2319 GREENWOOD ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2319. GREENWOO MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,939.59 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8986 60 WHITE WALTER ASSESSABLE FEET: 5.3 24-205-620-0001-10 2326 GREENWOOD ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2326. GREENWOO MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $186.30 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.1203 61 DYKSTRA RITA J/ROWE A J ASSESSABLE FEET: 106.15 24-205-620-0001-00 2320 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2320. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,731.11 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.4098 62 CROSS LON L/ET AL ASSESSABLE FEET: 48.5 24-205-640-0007-00 2003 HARDING AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2003. HARDING A MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,104.78 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1010 63 MOORE LORI L/ARTHUR L ASSESSABLE FEET: 33 24-205-639-0008-10 2006 HARDING AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2006. HARDING A MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,159.95 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.7492 1/30/2004 Page 9 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 64 KOWALSKI ROSEMARY ASSESSABLE FEET: 66 24-205-639-0008-00 2101 MOON ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2272. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319.90 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983 65 VINTON DENNISE ASSESSABLE FEET: 66 24-205-639-0007-10 PO BOX 303 COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2264. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-030 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319.90 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983 66 SHERWOOD JAMES R ASSESSABLE FEET: 33 24-205-639-0007-00 2025 MORTON AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2025. MORTON AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,159.95 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.7492 67 JOHNSON JOHN O/CONNIE A LI ASSESSABLE FEET: 33 24-205-638-0009-00 2026 MORTON AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2026. MORTON AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,159.95 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.7492 68 DEERY RICHARD J ASSESSABLE FEET: 66 24-205-638-0008-00 3925 HARBOR POINT DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2226. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P 0. COST: I $2,319.90 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983 69 IBERSHOFF KARL G/JANIS K ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-205-638-0006-00 3000 COUNTRY CLUB DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2218. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,151.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351 70 DUDGEON LEE J/JANET TRUST ASSESSABLE FEET: 41 24-205-638-0007-00 1498 HIGH ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2204. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,441.1s 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9308 1/30/2004 Page 10 of 11 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. 71 RICHARDS GEORGE C ASSESSABLE FEET: 66 24-205-637-0008-00 2200 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2200. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319.90 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983 72 FGA LLC ASSESSABLE FEET: 66 24-205-637-0007-00 3404 FULTON AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2164. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319.90 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983 73 ANDERSON MARK D/KIM ASSESSABLE FEET: 66 24-205-636-0009-00 2140 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2140. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319_90 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983 74 LEITGEB ANTHONY J ASSESSABLE FEET: 57.75 24-205-636-0008-00 1015 CAMELOT DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2100. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49445 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: lc___$:_2.:.._,0_29_.9_1_, PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3110 75 VANFOSSEN BARB/JAMES ASSESSABLE FEET: 61.88 24-205-636-0007-00 3276 SOL TWOOD DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2085. LAKESHOR MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,115.08 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4048 SUM OF ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE: 4404.89 SUM OF ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ! $154,831.88 I TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE PARCELS 75.00 1/30/2004 Page 11 of 11 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2075 MINER AVE Parcel Number 24-205-643-0001-00 Assessable Frontage: $45.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foo•t--=-RE.:=-:C;::.;E\VEO ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,581.75 FEB 0 ?. ?llO½ Property Description City Clerks Ottlce CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT 1903 BLK 643 THE NL Y 90 FT OF THE FOLLOWING DEC PARCEL LOT 1 & EASTERLY 64 FT OF LOT 2 ALSO Youf vote COUi~TS! • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. _[81 ~=-T~ )"",'\-'\ I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED Owoec CoOwoec/Spo,se -::::.~~.i.i...i;;_.....1...r..JJ..J..l.i....;:a..i:...1...1o.i:..:. Signature ( ~~~ SignatLtt~~=,..&.~~......;~~~~=~-.J Address :J, c, :i5:-S(Oi'JI\('. .1- Addre§S..> _--------'"~.L....L...LJ..J..Ji.l..l....L-~ 29 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return thls card by mail, simp!y fold on the dotted lines so the ~drlress on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2471 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-649-0003-00 RECEIVED CITY OF MUSKEGON Assessable Frontage: $89.08 Feet $35.15 per Foot FEB O2 2004 Estimated Front Foot Cost: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,131.16 Property Description CITY O F MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 FE§ nt>. ?OOt BLK 649 LOTS 3 & 4 ~ · 1 Glerks Gfftoe Your voi.e COUi~TS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR 1 I AM OPPOSED • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. ✓r Signature Address SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD . NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mai!, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse side !s showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2204 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-638-0007-00 Assessable Frontage: $41.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,441.15 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 r~IU!!Jj=;O;-;S~>f~Je:-::,o::--,."+-!0-- BLK 638 NWLY82 FTLOT7 & NWLY 82 FT OF SWLY 10 FT LOT6 f u Hi:J Your vote COUi-JTS! U:i;Ll}J aC) =1 /:J Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. CITY OF MUSKEGON STREET H-1561 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. CDBG APPLICATION FOR W AIYER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION z· - Name: ~ c._ ,-.; ~r J?'-'- cP) -~ ., tJ B'.rthdate: ~ 5,~-:' :"- Soci~l Securi'.y # -~&,.~ . t!!-~? Spouse: I '<::.. c: . ?5 '" p <:; ,._,. - B1rthdate: ·//2 0/.--:. V Socrnl Security IBh. -_,_··•_._- 731,1,. Address: / '£, ':Z f' ,~-c1f ;(, S:/ Phor( 2 -~ / ) 2 '>7' -D 1/{l ,YRace: Parcel#~ '/-.::,U-~- {, 3·>s" - I'.: J - b cc Owner/Spouse Legally Handicapped Or Disabled? kJYcs ( l' '" ) No (Please refer to your assessment letter for this information) Number Living in Household: _::;,_, List infonnation for household members besides owner/spouse here. Name {J~~-- Birthdate _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _ Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Birthdate Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _ Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Birthdate Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdatc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Social Security# . . ... . . . . . . INCOME INFORMATION ·. ANNUAL Household Income: Wage earner: (Must include all household income) Wage earner: Wage earner: Wage earner: Total: .·. PROPERTY INFORMATION ·. Proof Of Ownership: <)() Deed ( ) Mortgage ( ) Land Contract Homcowner's Insurance Co: ~ &::7=Ji?7..,...:-G~)<:xpiration Date: ; - -.:;i b ..Cy Property Taxes: <)<( Cunent ( ) Delinquent Year(s) Due (Prope11y taxes must be cuJTcnt to qualify and will be verified by CDBG staft) . . ' . . . ·. ...--, _ OWNER'S SIGNATURE . . Owner's Signature/ / ~ ~ ~ ) 1 ,,_ · · · Date: ;2.. - .2 -G,Y By signing this applkation, the applicant veri!'iis he/she owns and occupies the dwelling. The Applicant/Owner ce11ifies that all information in this application, and all information furnished in support of this application, is trne and complete to the best of the Applicant/Owner's knowledge and belief. The property owner's signature will be required prior to the application being processed. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER APRIL 15, 2004 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) DATE _ _ _ _ CENSUS TRACT NO. SIGNATURE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ TITLE COMMENTS/REMARKS **ATTENTION APPLICANT** Please see reverse side for instructions on providing proof of income, ownership, and property insurance. r our vute l.-VUI~, 0: Owner I AM IN FAVOR • )h Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. ( J 'l 6 /It {j, L) :;P I AM OPPOSED CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ~ Signature ) / ~v ,..,. )_) > }, l ;·3 ~k.),: ~-' IC¥ \; :\_ --- /2 ( Signature Address ,s,_3.9-_(p (3-y\:''i nt,:{ 'J:5&) Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue, 60 FEB O4 rrir,~ City Clerks Office CITY OF MUSKEGON STREET H-1561 McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. CDBG APPLICATION FOR W AIYER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HOUSEHOLD INFOR1\1ATION NameMit.t,l)(~,lb:Gt, u. )b ;1c~ Birthdate: 1-! :;-/:;.5 ' Social Security #4,25 -9d_;J7J/' Spouse: . ----·- ·---· . Birthdate: .-----· Social Security# ~c=:::_-_ _ AddressJ-/'.kJ (e {_7((,lf 11 {,(./IJt,'if? "'1 - __,_JJ Phon~~')' 7.:.::-.-aJ - 1J,::;-CJ Race: ,.-----~ Parcel#.-)"} '}i-U ") -~J.u ·OC\) I - Id Owner/Spouse Legally Handicapped Or{oisabled?, ( :-)Yes ( ) No (Please refer to your assessment letter for this infonnation) Number Living in Household: I List information for household members besides owner/spouse here. Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ . . .. . . . . INCOME INFORMATION ANNUAL Household Income: $ q{{/i (Y! Wage earner: (Must include all household income) 1 d t'.I. (_f) Wage earner: Wage earner: Wage earner: ·. Total: $ c11 ~.cc PROPERTY INFORMATION . Proof Of Ownership: ( ) Deed ( ) Mortgage ( ) Land Contract Homeowner's Insurance Co: Expiration Date: " Property Taxes: ( ~) Current ( ) Delinquent Year(s) Due (Property taxes must be cun"cnt to qualify and will be verified by CDBG staff) . ·. O)VNER'S SIGNATURE .. . Owner's Signature:( ,_} c~~ , '7 ') ,/_;J_, lJ /L V\._ <-: ..1 Date: By signing this application, the applicant verifies he/she owns and occupies the dwelling. The Applicant/Owner certifies that all information in this application, and all infonnation furnished in support of this application, is true and complete to the best of the Applicant/Owner's knowledge and belief. The property owner's signature will be required prior to the application being processed. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER APRIL 15, 2004 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) DATE CENSUS TRACT NO. SIGNATURE TITLE COMMENTS/REMARKS **ATTENTION APPLICANT** Please see reverse side for instructions on providing proof of income, ownership, and property insurance. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2488 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-210-002-0002-00 Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED I ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50 FEB 0 ,1 ·;r,n 1• Property Description City Clerks Office _J CITY OF MUSKEGON COMMUNITY PARK A SUB DIV OF BLK 617 618 619 N 3 FT LOT 1 & ALL LOT 2 BLK 2 You, vote COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. CoOwner/Spouse I AM OPPOSED ~ ...:..IJ.:1..J.,ji.,1.....J..~:;..::::........___ ------------ Signature Signature Address Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 47 /;,;f,ere. CU't. My f.,,'( do// u.rf <J & \ 11 j ? SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this c2rd by mnil, slmply fo!d on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2538 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-210-001-0001-00 Assessable Frontage: $41.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,441.15 FEB n i, ·;,"''' Property Description City Clerks OffiCf. CITY OF MUSKEGON COMMUNITY PARK A SUB DIV OF BLKS 617 618 619 LOT 1 BLK 1 Y0Li1" vote COUNTS! I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED ~_ Owner --~~8,Poz; q:, H£<?;5tgq;!, CoOwner/Spouse -M1>i-rt(, A'..' fk6r}:icJM S1gnatur~ /4/ ,' ;/:4 ·. '. ' ,-"/ l. Signature f),r/[((0.!/ o, i&pt<lcz.-,c,J'} ( ('~m c- Address 1) ,/ '· . Address .;zaq,g it), Of/f,f. /~IA 11,/ 7 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 40 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mnil, simp!y fo!d en the dotted !ines so the address on thP rF.!verse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2458 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-210-002-0006-00 Assessable Frontage: $60.00 Feet RECEIVED Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot I· IJ~ n / ;,r,nti ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,109.00 City Clerks Office_) Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON COMMUNITY PARK A SUB DIV OF BLK 617 618 619 N 112 LOT 5 & ALL LOT 6 BLK 2 YoLir vote COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. 0 Signature Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 50 .:..,PECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mai!, simply fo!d on the dotterl lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2465 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-649-0002-00 Assessable Frontage: $44.54 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,565.58 RECEIVED Property Description -D n ~-1 F1:n ·•r•,,1, 1 ' 11 l CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT AOF 1903 BLK 649 Ctty Clerks Office.J LOT2 Your vvto COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. __ / -//1,I:-_,(/::.- CoOwner/Spouse I AM OPPOSED ~ Signature Signature ------------ Address Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 12 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this ::;3rd by m::ii!, simply fo!d on +he dotted lines so the :ciddress on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2382 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-395-002-0002-00 Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50 Property Description City Clerks Olfic, - ,C:..7.·~.:c,.,--:,-.=- CITY OF MUSKEGON GREENWOOD SUB DIV BEING PART OF LOTS 1-2-3 & 4 BLK 620 LOT 2 BLK 2 Your vule COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. CoOwner/Spouse I AM OPPOSED 0 ~~..u.o.....i,...,...;.:::.:,~aa::_-- ------------ Signature Signature Address Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 56 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BL VD. TO LAKES HORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return th!s card by m3!!, sirnp!y fo!d on the dottGd liilc3 ::;o the add;-c3s on the ieverse ~idt: is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2085 LAKESHORE DR Parcel Number 24-205-636-0007-00 Assessable Frontage: $61.88 Feet $35.15 per Foot Estimated Front Foot Cost: RECEIVED ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,175.08 Property Description City Clerks Office CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOT 7 BLK 636 Your voie CC•UNTS! • Please vote either in favor or opposed tltti;special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED 0 Owner ......:ais~~:;;.-,:_r~l,....;..';:.....,;i;..'.'.:~,,.i!.../4;..,;.;;s;..'...;..___ _ CoOwner/Spouse Signature /l,f'-.......... ~ Signature Address -z,:; s,~ L.k.,> ~ /),-... Address 75 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate wl1ether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the :ciddress on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2026 MORTON AVE Parcel Number 24-205-638-0009-00 Assessable Frontage: $33.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,159.95 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOT 9 BLK 638 Cl Clerks Office YJur vote COUNTS~ 0 I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED ©' Owner °"J;j ~oOwner/Spouse Co 11/J F7 It If- ,Jo/4 ;zS:70., Signature Signature · ·;; · /, · · ·! ~0 .,. /;:-'//<&A· ,../ /.:,/ ( _ ,£,ra2":3e: 4-ik? c.-,/ Address C:/ go,rgi; /?2cJ y f? J.-::\__ Address ::) c),:;2 <:;;, /-1'16~ 7v Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. . · · 167 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To --retttm·this· cardiby mai!, sfmp!y fold on the dotte-d lines so thELaddress on the reverse .side..is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2319 GREENWOOD ST Parcel Number 24-035-400-0001-01 Assessable Frontage: $83.63 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,939.59 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON C Clerks Office SEC 35 T10N R17W PT OF BLKS 617-620 DESC AS COM ATS 114 CCR TH N 89D 18M 05S E ALG S LN OF SD SEC 1328 09 FT TH N 00D 17M 00S E ALG E LN OF NEUMANNS SUB 511.41 FT Yuw vols COUNTS'. Owner IAMINFAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Spec,al Assessment Street Paving Project// - IAMOPPOSED 0 Signature Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 59 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To r6tum this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2169 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-642-0001-00 Assessable Frontage: $45.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot fiECEIVED ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,581.75 Property Description City Clerks Office CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT 1903 BLK 642 NL Y 90 FT LOT 1 WITH W 19.60 FT OF MCCRACKEN ST ABUTTING SO DESC LOT 'r • ,.....,,..._, ,, ,..,...,..., ! our '/Ole GUU!\I I;:).; Owner I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special I AM OPPOSED ~-~;;;=-.,;;;_-""";;;;;=~=-✓-~- ...(i,......_.L;:..........,......;~..i...:..i...;wu._,,poowner/Spou~_::··-::::::::::===:;;;;:;:::::__ _ __ Signature 32 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To ;etw-r; this card by mai!, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the Address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2409 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-648-0001-00 Assessable Frontage: $58.50 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,056.28 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 BLK 648 E 110 FT LOT 1 EX S 183 FT THEREOF Your vc,te COUNTC! I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED [Z] Owner \)1fll(. l:iVf 11 I?, 0 ,&foOwner/Spouse ()e,b fC.c. ,S I R j (J Ko,. Signature \f#r,f'uc/ / -Mf( r Signature Q f' k,._ s, 8,6(?);2,eA.., Address t4of /ilc C1t11cl<o,/5f Address ;). L/ (J CJ !½ ccr~,,1 .St 17 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BL VD. TO LAKES HORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2493 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-649-0005-00 Assessable Frontage: $89.08 Feet RECEIVED Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,131.16 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 BLK 649 LOTS 5 & 6 Your vole COUNTS! • w Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED Owner 1 )j.\ Vh> /J.. (!1ci, cj>-i.,,-,1..CoOwner/Spouse I ~~ - - - - - - - - Signature / il - / · ,£ 0 -----··· s·1gnat ure ,v/j! ~ £¥ , u.,,,/,:·--2. ~ Address 10 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. SPEC IA ....,...,MENT HEARING , _,.:,i-JONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count , please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST. , SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mal!, simply fold on the dotted lines so the ;::idrlrn~s on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2175 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-642-0001 -10 Assessable Frontage: $100.50 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,532.58 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT 1903 BLK 642 LOT 1 ELY 64 FT OF LOTS 19 & 20 ELY 64 FT OF VAC 16.5 FT ALLEY BETWEE N SD LOTS 1 & 20 BLK 642 ALSO WL Y 19.6 FT OF MCCRACl<EN STREET ABUTTING SAME Your vott:: COUNTS! • Please vote either iri favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM IN FAVOR // I AM OPPOSED ~ rv7 Owner <_-; ;~-- t / 2 A / 4 ~wner/Spouse l/f, ill ----- Signature YCe2J u fl T ,cu, /4/2/k:C Signature Address so /21 l!e5/2c:Jr.( £bl Address M v1s /(€')uvt 1////; [.,/'J°{j{/t/ 31 Thank you for taking the time to v'ote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACl-<EN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return thb card by mail, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the address on thP rPv~rse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2264 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-639-0007-10 RECEIVED Assessable Frontage: $66.00 Feet •·-rrt{ I - I Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot C Clerks Off ice ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,319.90 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 BLK 639 SE 1/2 LOT 7 Your vole COUNTS! I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED ~ I Owner f)t-·n n1\ V1rrfon. CoOwner/Spouse _Mti ··:1 \/1,m'i::;r,. Signature J;l)i.1)\nw, zP. ' ']/,' ,1,_ . ft'~v Signature, 7Y)lj,1;,< ,i )/.t:-fnr'1.__} 1 {\~/· (··. /',.1r✓•.·1 r,.__. L\:Lr~1,-·1 Address d/' t;~'l/,,; /__'I IY/ G C A/1,/i ro ( /".(-:/L. • •. ,1/ Address " \ ,- ......;,'r-'l?i.,;..· () ·i___,._~...:....: ' t.... ··.:..f1~L;...' L..........._1:...,;;.;--;.;.r..;.; 1, ..:, ·_-, ~ i...;.;.. 65 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. / SPECIAL ASSESSMENT I (;,O HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST. , SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return thin c.::::rd by mail, simply fo!d on th!?- dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing . IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2564 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-645-000-0002-00 RECE\VED Assessable Frontage: $40.00 Feet rll\ ; Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35 .15 per Foot City Clerks Office ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,406.00 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON NEUMANS SUBDIVISION OF BLK 616 LOT2 Yuui· vote COU~4TSl Owner I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. //4/',f/.1r e 1 /ll!r/' ~r I AM OPPOSED CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ~ 1 : :~~~:/ ~4?::tJ ::;,::: /.'&~ ~ /4~ .,,y:7"/f'/ Thank you fw taking the time to vote on this important issue. 38 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please p Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST. , SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To ,etum this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse $ide is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2003 HARDING AVE Parcel Number 24-205-640-0007-00 Assessable Frontage: $48.50 Feet $35.15 per Foot Estimated Front Foot Cost: RECEIVED ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,704.78 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON City Clerks Office REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOT7 BLK 640 Your vote COUi,ffSl I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED IXI Owner ... ....:..... ,✓ -:::~ ....... --P ~E-·....~--a.........~- - - - - - CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ....-.,...... Signature Signature Address Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. ''1v,si,;.,.~-- '·• 62 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote co.unt, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST. ; SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sig n the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mall, simply fold on the dotted !!nes so the address on thP. reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2271 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-644-0001-10 Assessable Frontage: $100.50 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,532.58 Property Description C ITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOTS 1 AND 10 BLK 644 ALSO 16.50 FT VAC ALLEY BETWEEN SD LOTS 1 AND 10 ALSO WLY 19.60 FT OF MCCRACKEN STREET ABUTTING SAME EXC THE NLY 90 FT THEREOF Your vole COLJ ~~TS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR ?.e< • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. / . J # ~owner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ I AM OPPOSED ~ . I Signature s;_. ,.,u [Jar(c.{f;f' /7 Signature Address 50 41 /(f5WJrf. f> /uJ Address tlvf l4 7 f1°"?& "I IM i '{'1c,fl(lf ThanR-yod for taking the time to vote on this important issue. ,.,.•:•"-" -•· , ~, .!' , 25 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted lines so the adrlress on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2272 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-639-0008-00 Assessable Frontage: $66.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,319.90 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 BLK 639 NW 1/2 LOT 8 '{our vole COUNTS! Address Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 64 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2006 HARDING AVE Parcel Number 24-205-639-0008-10 Fl~ I-'. , -c_·.· : \ (' . ·f ?iln!. . Assessable Frontage: $33.00 Feet City ' '·ks Ottic.e Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,159.95 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 BLK 639 SE 1/2 LOT 8 Your vole COUNTSl • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM IN ~AVOR I AM OPPOSED ~ Owner ~.:YU:, "f JV~-1.r<-( CoOwner/Spouse ~) =· Signature faili< -~ [/ lj':-z.7:('. ~- ·. 1 /7/J/l . Signature J\. Address . ? oar,; U/u:&r0 tibt-. Address J. tt e, l fl~T (1.fte.. 63 Thank you for taking the tirf:"lto vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To rtilurn this CE.id by mc:i!, simp!y fo!d on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2355 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-64 7-0001-00 Assessable Frontage: $71.70 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,520.26 RECEIVED Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 City Clerks Office BLK 647 N 112 OF LOTS 1-2 Your vote COUNTS! I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED [8:1 Owner ~fi,/1.}c/~ 14 {L,r,e'.4N./ CoOwner/Spouse . /(r&KIt T (7-1) (VJ 6-.A l'\.. I / Signature..___.-0a-,v{,:,_., a. c?<,,f'--<'Lc.•-V /, Address x ,., .,-.-;- 7:itflU<-,c~.)u,'/_ Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 20 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return thic card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2521 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-205-650-0002-00 Assessable Frontage: $81.54 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,866.13 RECEIVED Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 City Clerks Office BLK 650 LOTZ & N 37 FT OF LOT 3 Yuur vote COU~~TS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR I VIII/ • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. J_, ,5111/hlflJ I AM OPPOSED CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ lx] ,./ ,:J ~ -4 ,/ Signature Signature 0:'<tU?Z \.., 2Y J/ <'.~tt-vf!,{ ; Address ,,'.lQ I Ill C d1NC/2:P,Y Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 8 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by moil, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse sirle is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2218 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number RECEIVED .24-205-638-0006-00 Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet FEB 0 n 1nn1, Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot City Clerks Office ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50 Property Description -·-=---.....,..-.... S)fJ8/:) Al!O ()'.)f)JO CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 BLK 638 ,c1 U:l:l LOT6 EX SWLY 10 FTOF NWLY 82 FT I f--~ !\ :Jr')-~~-.J & SEL Y 50 FT LOT 7 ..... ~ .• ·/ \.,.,_...i~,-•"···•<J Yul.ii vot0 COUNTS! I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED , ✓,r o_wner~.•.···rv#. ~~ CoOwner/Spouse -11½-!t s, /4$>f!9/cl=/> Signature ~ > Signature ,:f!41;A) S o ~ Address .36eb Cw0nA'( d , /0 ~ Address 3bpt) C11-2vJ1('( (i uR ('),{ Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 69 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To nciturn this card hy mc1il, sirnply fold on the dotted lines so the ilddress on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2563 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-779-001-0002-00 Assessable Frontage: $44.54 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot $1,565.58 RECEIVED ESTIMATED TOTAL COST Property Description FEB o ci 7nn1, CITY OF MUSKEGON City Clerks Office SUB DIV OF BLK 651 LOT 2 BLK 1 '/oLir vota COUNTS! • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED IBJ Owner c:ely,, fr/, J\Jd.son Co Owner/Spouse ------------ . S 1gna ture CJ ' L/l·t-&-t't':7rQ /// l' IL<-_,~ Signature Address ,1,f,) l- 3 f) c.,Cr--.1 cke 0 Address 3 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mci!, simp!y fo!d on the dotted !ines s0 the ;cidrlrnss on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" n~ PROJECT. RECEIVED Assessment Information Property Address: 2480 MCCRACKEN ST FEB f\ .. Parcel Number 24-210-002-0003-00 City Clerks Office Assessable Frontage: $45.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ')fr' ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,581.75 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON COMMUNITY PARK A SUB DIV OF BLK 617 618 619 LOT 3 BLK 2 Your vute COUt4TGt • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED IXI Owner '(_l'-"1"-J""''°l.,.-,__L.:...I.:..;d....t...z-S~c.;..~.:.:"...I __ .CoGwflerfSpouse -'-!?i""'c'c,,;;.'l... Signature Signature (J ', ._ v1 VI, \'' bY".<'\ ; 1> /-1/)1 i' - ) Address /✓-~/J- ;J)itc1/l ;f~J ; . ~//u,Je~NJ ". _,Address / , ,,(-;,'cf~! 48 Thank you for taking the iime to vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1561 Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To r6turn this cn~d by m::::i, simply fold or the ,:lotted lin<>s "O the cirldress on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2472 MCCRACKEN ST Parcel Number 24-210-002-0004-00 Assessable Frontage: $70.60 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,481.59 Property Description RECEIVED CITY OF MUSKEGON COMMUNITY PARK A SUB DIV OF BLK 617 618 619 LOT4 & S 1/2 LOT 5 __(2ity qlEJrks Office BLK 2 Your vote COUNTS! Owner • . Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street P ,ng P~ I AM IN FAVOR ~!-c ( f11i-, Owner/Spouse I AM OPPOSED . ,/1 ·, _,,;--. Sigl").aiYfe- ~~::....._.~::-.,;.,="'""":;_-f,.4'- Signature Address d c_( 7+ Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this impo1iant issue. 49 Date: Febrnmy 10,2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Engineeting RE: Public Hearing Create Special Assessment District for: Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of the Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St., and to create the special assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the attached resolution COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF MUSKEGON Resolution No. 2004-lB(e) Resolution At First Hearing Creating Special Assessment District For Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St. Location and Description of Prope1iies to be Assessed: See Exhibit A attached to this resolution RECITALS: I. A hearing has been held on February 10, 2004 at 5:30 o'clock p.m. at the City Commission Chambers. Notice was given by mail and publication as required by law. 2. That estimates of costs of the project, a feasibility report and valuation and benefit information are on file with the City and have been reviewed for this hearing. 3. At the hearing held February JO, 2004, there were 60.14 % objections by the owners of the property in the district registered at the hearing either in writing received before or at the hearing or by owners or agents present at the hearing, and the Commission has considered the advisability of proceeding with the project. FINDINGS: I. The City Commission has examined the estimates of cost to construct the project including all assessable expenses and determines them to be reasonable. 2. The City Commission has considered the value of the property to be assessed and the value of the benefit to be received by each prope1iy proposed to be assessed in the district after the improvements have been made. The City Commission determines that the assessments of costs of the City project will enhance the value of the properties to be assessed in an amount at least equivalenfto the assessment and that the improveiiient thereby constitutes a benefit to the property. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I. The City Commission hereby declares a special assessment district to include the prope1iy set fo1ih in Exhibit A attached to this resolution. 2. The City Commission determines to proceed with the improvements as set forth in the feasibility study and estimates of costs, and directs the City Engineer to proceed with project design, preparation of specifications and the bidding process. If appropriate and if bonds are to be sold for the purposes of financing the improvements, the Finance Department shall prepare plans for financing including submission of application to the Michigan Depaiiment of Treasury and the beginning of bond proceedings. 3. The City Commission hereby appoints a Board of Assessors consisting of City Commissioners Davis Larson and ----===-=-=------ and the City Assessor ,vl10 are hereby directed to prepare an assessment roll. Assessments shall be made upon front foot basis. 4. Based on the City's Special Assessment policy and preliminary estimates it is expected that approximately 7.27% of the cost of the street improvement will be paid by special assessments. 5. Upon submission of the special assessment roll, the City staff is hereby directed to notify all owners and persons interested in properties to be assessed of the hearing at which the City Commission will consider confirmation of the special assessment roll. This resolution adopted. Ayes Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd Nays None CITY OF MUSKEGON By~ O.~ L Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk ACKNOWLEDGMENT This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10, 2004. The meeting was properl y held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976. CITY OF MUSKEGON By ~Q. ~Gail A. Kundinger,Clerk EXHIBIT A Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT All properties abutting that section of Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St.. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) ss COUNTY OF MUSKEGON ) TO CREATE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FOLLOWING: Sherman Blvd.;. Lincoln St. to Beach St. THE DEPONENT SAYS THAT THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED UPON EACH OWNER OF OR PARTY IN INT EREST IN PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED IN THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHOSE NAME APPEARS UPON THE LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE BY FIRST CLASS UNITED STA TES MAIL, WITH POSTAGE PREPAID, ADDRESSED TO EACH SUCH OWNER OR PARTY IN INTEREST AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON SAID LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS BY DEPOSITING THEM IN AN OFFICIAL UNITED STATES MAIL RECEPTACLE ON THE 30TH DAY OFL AR Y, 2004. . . ~ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS //t/2 DAY OF hb r u t:1 r 't!.- C7 , 2004. dA1&0i g{) . I~ NOTARY PUBLIC, MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES </ - :2 S- 0 k LOCATION MAP -- . MUSKEGON COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE PROJECT LOCATION ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY For Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St. The reconstruction of Sherman Blvd. between Lincoln and Beach street, see attached exhibit, was initiated by the City due to the conditions of the pavement and the need to reestablish some type of a shoulder to accommodate pedestrian traffic. The existing pavement has deteriorated to a level where a total reconstruction is necessary; resurfacing will result in the reappearance of reflective cracking shortly after paving. This section of road has not had, to the best of our records, any major work since the late sixties or early seventies before it became a City Road. The proposed improvements (reconstruction) consist of following; I. Complete removal of existing pavement and replace with a new asphalt street section that would include curb & gutter and a proposed width of 37' back to back. The additional width of one foot might be utilized in the future for a turn lane if the need arises. However, for the time being it would be used for an on street parking where permissible. 2. Minor water main upgrades and about ] I-service to be replace. A memo from the Assessor's office, which addresses the appraisal and benefit information, is attached. Please take notice that the Equalization department felt that the Country Club receives not benefits from the proposed improvements assessment and therefore no assessment should be levied against that property. The preliminary cost estimate for the work associated with paving is approximately $525,000 with the length of the project being approximately 3900 lineal feet (project length) or 1085.50 of assessable footage. This translates into an estimated improvement cost of $484 per assessable foot. The assessment figure will be at a cost not to exceed $35.15 per assessable foot as established in the 2004 Special Assessment for this type of improvement MUSKEGON COUNTY 173 E. APPLE AVE., BUILDING C, MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN 49442 M C H G A N (231 I 724-6386 FAX (231) 724-1129 EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Paul T. Baade, Chair Bill Gill, Vice-Chair Douglas A. Bennett Charles L. Buzzell James J. Derezinski Marvin R. Engle Louis A. McMurray January 28, 2004 Robert Scolnik I. John Snider II Stephen R. Wisniewski Mohammed Al-Shatel, City Engineer City of Muskegon 933 Terrace Street Muskegon,MI49443 Mr. Al-Shatel: In accordance with your request, I have examined the proposed special assessment district entailing the reconstruction of W Sherman Boulevard between Lincoln Street and Beach Street. The purpose ofthis analysis is to document the reasonableness ofthls special assessment district by identifying and quantifying any accrued benefits. It is subject to the normal governmental restrictions of escheat, taxation, police power and eminent domain. The effective date is January 28, 2004. In conclusion, it is my opinion that the special assessment amounts justly and reasonably represents the accrued benefits to the properties encompassed by thls project except the Muskegon Country Club parcel. The Muskegon Country Club parcel has no entrance on W Sherman Boulevard and the golf course comes up to the trees and fence along W Sherman Boulevard. All of their buildings are on the Lakeshore Drive side of the parcel and I feel there isn't any benefit to thls parcel due to the reconstruction project. Therefore, the parcel's linear footage has not been considered in the value of the project. The amounts reflect the sum of the immediate estimated value enhancement and the intrinsic value that will accrue from an overall increase in property values due to an improved quality of life created by the proposed project. As previously presented, the proposed special assessment district encompasses primarily a commercial golf course and residential properties. The front foot rate of $3 5 .15 for the reconstruction of the above mentioned project area, less the frontage for the golf course property, appears rea~onable in light of an analysis that indicates a possible enhancement of$36.69. The conclusions are based upon the data presented withln thls limited analysis in restricted format, and on supporting information in my files. Sincerely, J~ Q_~_,_~ Vicki A Emery, CMAE 3 - - Cf Senior Appraiser TDD (231) 722-4103 • An EEO/ ADA/ AA Employer recycled paper January 30, 2004 Dear :OWNERS NAME OWNERS ADDRESS OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE, OWNERS ZIPCODE 1 The City of Muskegon is asking for your support for improvement of the street adjoining your property located at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET. The City of Muskegon believes that by making the proposed street improvements you will have less road noise, dust, and wear and tear on your vehicle. In addition, street improvements provide easier access for delivery of services such as snow plowing, mail delivery, and bus service. Called a special assessment district, the largest percentage of the proposed street improvement will be paid for by the City of Muskegon (via local funds and or grants); however, it will be necessary for you to cover a share of the cost (which you can spread over a period of ten years) based on the amount of property you own bordering the street. A description of the project, including the associated cost to you and the City, is located in the documents attached to this letter. While the City of Muskegon believes that the proposed improvements will result in a safer and cleaner street while adding curb appeal to your property, you do have the right to ask further questions, decline, or protest participation in this particular project. Please carefully review the enclosed materials and call the City's Engineering Department at 724-6707 or your ward commissioner if you require more information. A public hearing is also scheduled for this project on FEBRUARY 10, 2004. If you attend this public hearing you will be given an opportunity to present your questions and potential concerns on the proposed special assessment district to the commission. Also located in this packet of materials is a Special Assessment Hearing Response Card. If mailed back to the City of Muskegon City Clerk's Office before the scheduled public hearing your vote will be added to the tabulation of votes during the public hearing. If you do not send in this form your vote counts as "in favor" of the project. Thank you for your participation in improving the quality of life in the Muskegon community. January 30, 2004 OWNERS NAME OWNERS ADDRESS OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE OWNERS ZIPCODE 1 Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX: at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET NOTICE OF HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Dear Property Owner: The Muskegon City Commission is considering whether or not to create a special assessment district which would assess your property for the following paving project: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. The proposed special assessment district will be located as follows: All parcels abutting Sherman Blvd .. from Lincoln St. to Beach St. It is proposed that a portion of the above improvement will be paid by special assessment against properties in the aforementioned district. Following are conditions of the proposed special assessment which are important to you. Public Hearings An initial public hearing to consider the creation of a special assessment district will be held at the City of Muskegon City Commission Chambers on FEBRUARY 10, 2004 at 5:30 P.M. You are encouraged to appear at this hearing, either in person, by agent or in writing to express your opinion, approval, or objection concerning the proposed special assessment. We are enclosing a Hearing Response Card for you to indicate your agreement or opposition to the special assessment. This card includes the property identification and description, assessable footage per City policy, and the estimated cost of the assessment. You may also appear, as above, in lieu of, or in addition to mailing your response card to the City Clerk. Written objections or appearances must be made at or prior to the hearing. NOTE: THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT WILL BE CREATED OR NULLIFIED AT THIS HEARING. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO COMMENT AT THIS HEARING IF YOU WANT YOUR OPINION COUNTED FOR THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. A second public hearing will be held, if the district is created, to confirm the special assessment roll after the project is completed. You will be mailed a separate notice for the second hearing. At this second hearing the special assessment costs will be spread on the affected properties accordingly. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT AGAINST YOUR PARCEL EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THIS HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED AT THE SECOND HEARING, YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30} DAYS FROM THE DATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE ROLL TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THE INITIAL HEARING OR AT THE SECOND HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY AGENT, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST. By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the properties to be assessed shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement. Estimated Costs The total estimated cost of the street portion of the project is $525,000.00 of which approximately 7.27% ($38,155.33) will be paid by special assessment to property owners. Your property's estimated share of the special assessment is shown on the attached hearing response card. The remaining costs will be paid by the City. The street assessment, which covers improvements to the roadway, may be paid in installments over a period of up to ten (10) years. Any work on drive approaches or sidewalks will be assessed to the property at actual contract prices and these costs may also be paid in installments over ten (10) years. Please note this work is in addition to the street special assessment. Please refer to the enclosed sheet entitled Special Assessment Payment Options for more information on the payment options and financial assistance programs available. I urge you to return the enclosed hearing response card indicating your preference and to attend the scheduled public hearing. Your views are important to the City and to your neighbors. Additional information, including preliminary project plans and cost estimates is available in the Engineering Department located on the second floor of City Hall. Regular business hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday except holidays. Sincerely, ~~~/41 Mohammed AI-Shatel, P.E. City Engineer 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX Assessable Frontage: $105.50 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,708.33 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOTS 8 AND 9 BLK 686 ANDS 112 OF ADJ VAC ALLEY ABUTTING SD LOTS Your vote COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR • I AM OPPOSED • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. Signature ----------- CoOwner/Spouse Signature ------------- Address Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. CITY OF MUSKEGON STREET H-1531 SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. to BEACH ST. CDBG APPLICATION FOR W AIYER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT . HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION . Name: Birthdate: Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Spouse: Birthdatc: Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _ Address: Phone: Race: Parcel# Owner/Spouse Legally Handicapped Or Disabled? ( )Yes ( ) No (Please refer to your assessment letter for this infonnation) Number Living in Household: List information for household members besides owner/spouse here. Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdatc Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _ -,-c . INCOME INFORMATION ·. ANNUAL Household Income: $ Wage earner: (Must include all household income) Wage earner: Wage earner: Wage earner: Total: $ .. . I. PROPERTY INFORMATION Proof Of Ownership: ( ) Deed ( ) Mortgage ( ) Land Contract Homeowner's Insurance Co: Expiration Date: Property Taxes: ( ) Current ( ) Delinquent Year(s) Due (Property taxes must be cmTent to qualify and will be verified by CDBG .staff) ·· .. OWNER'S SIGNATURE . Owner's Signature: Date: By signing this application, the applicant verifies he/she owns and occupies the dwelling. The Applicant/Owner certifies that all infonnation in this application, and all information furnished in support of this application, is true and complete to the best of the Applicant/Owner's knowledge and belief. The property owner's signature will be required prior to the application being processed. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER APRIL 15, 2004 . ~ . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY .. . APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) DATE CENSUS TRACT NO. SIGNATURE TITLE COMMENTS/REMARKS **ATTENTION APPLICANT** Please see reverse side for instructions on providing proof of income, ownership, and property insurance. CITY OF MUSKEGON STREET- H-1531 SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. REQUEST FOR WAIYER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Note: You may receive this application several times -Ifyou have already applied, please discard. Dear Resident: The City of Muskegon has selected the street abutting your propetiy for repairs. To assist homeowners, who may have difficulty paying the cost of street repairs, the City offers assessment waivers through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for eligible households and families. lfyou meet the CDBG program qualifications, the City may pay the street assessment for you to the extent that funds are available. Application Requirements: ✓ Applicants must submit proof that their total household income does not exceed 65% of Area Median Income (see chmi below); Proof of income may include copies of Wage & Tax Statement (W-2's) from the year 2003, pension or other benefit checks, bank statements for direct deposits or agency statements for all household income. 2002 165% MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME CHART I FAMILY SIZE INCOME LIMIT I $27,885 2 31,850 3 35,880 4 39,845 5 43,030 6 46,326 7 49,400 8 52,585 For each extra, add 3,185 ✓ Applicants must submit proof that they both own and occupy property at the time of application; Land Contract purchasers must obtain approval of titleholder prior to receiving assistance. Proof of ownership should be a deed, m01igage, or land contract; proof of occupancy can be a copy of a driver's license or other official document showing both your name and address. ✓ Applicants must submit proof of current property insurance. Please complete the first four (4) sections of the application on the reverse side of this notice, and return it, along with suppotiing documentation, to: City of Muskegon Community & Neighborhood Services 933 Terrace Street, 2nd Floor Muskegon, MI 49440 For further information, please contact this office by calling 724-6717, weekdays from 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The City reserves the right to verifj: all application iJ?formation, and to reject any applications that contain falsified il?/Ormation or insufficient doc11111entation. Special Assessment Payment Options Property owners in the City of Muskegon who are being specially assessed for street, sidewalk or other public improvements may pay their assessment in the following ways: I. Lump Sum Payment in Full Assessments may be paid in full within sixty (60) days of the confirmation of the special assessment roll without interest. II. Installment Payments Assessments not paid within the first sixty (60) days may be paid in installments over several years as follows: Street and Alley Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments. For example, if the amount of your assessment is $850.00, you will be billed $85.00 per year plus applicable interest as described below. Driveway, Sidewalk, and Approach Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments plus applicable interest as described below. Interest- Simple interest is charged at the rate of 5.00% per year unless the City has borrowed money to complete the project for which you are assessed and has pledged you assessments for repayment of the borrowed money. In such cases, the interest you are charged is equal to the interest rate the City must pay on the borrowed money plus 1.00%. Ill. Special Assessment Deferral (Low Income Seniors and Disabled Persons) To qualify for a special assessment deferral you or your spouse (if jointly owned) must: • Be 65 years or older or be totally or permanently disabled. • Have been a Michigan resident for five (5) years or more and have owned and occupied the homestead being assessed for five (5) years or more. • Be a citizen of the U.S. • Have a total household income not in excess of $16,823.00 • Have a special assessment of $300.00 or more. Under this program the State of Michigan will pay the entire balance owing of the special assessment, including delinquent, current, and further installments. At the time of payment a lien will be recorded on your property in favor of the State of Michigan. Repayment to the State must be made at the time the property is sold or transferred or after the death of the owner(s). During the time the special assessment is deferred interest is accrued at the rate of 6.00% per year. IV. Further Information About the Above Programs Further information about any of the above payment options may be obtained by calling either the City Assessor's Office at 724-6708 or the City Treasurer's Office at 724-6720. Applications may be obtained at the Muskegon County Equalization Office in the Muskegon County building or City of Muskegon Assessor's Office in City Hall. V. Additional Special Assessment Payment Assistance Qualified low and moderate income homeowners who are being assessed may be eligible for payment assistance through the City of Muskegon Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Assistance from this program will be available to the extent that funds are available. To obtain further information and determine whether you are eligible, contact the Community and Neighborhood Services Department at 724-6717. CITY or MUSKEGON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS IN AN EFFORT TOWARDS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT, the Muskegon City Commission is proposing that special assessment districts be created for the following projects: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR. AND SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. The specific locations of the special assessment districts and the propetties proposed to be assessed are: All parcels abutting Beidler St. from Laketon Ave. to Southern Ave. All parcels abutting McCracken St. from Sherman Blvd. to Lakeshore Dr. And All parcels abutting Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln St. to Beach St. The City Commission proposes that the City and prope1ty owners by means of special assessments will share the cost of improvement. You may examine preliminary plans and cost estimates in the City Hall's Engineering Department during regular business hours - between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on weekdays, except holidays. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS ON FEBRUARY 10, 2004 AT 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THE HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED (AT A LATER HEARING) YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ROLL'S CONFIRMATION TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THIS HEARING OR AT THE HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY YOUR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO TI-IE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST. By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the property to be assessed shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement. PUBLISH: January 31, 2004 Gail Kundinger, City Clerk ADA POLICY The City will provide necessary appropriate auxiliary aids and services, for example, signers for the hearing impaired, audiotapes for the visually impaired, etc., for disabled persons who want to attend the meeting, upon twenty-four hours notice to the City. Contact: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Ml 49440 (23 I) 724-6705 or TDD (23 I) 724-6773 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT H 1531 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. 1 MURPHY CHAD/RITA L ASSESSABLE FEET: 105.5 24-205-686-0008-00 2596 W SHERMAN BL VD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2596. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,708.33 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 9.7190 2 RAHRIG EUGENE ASSESSABLE FEET: 100 24-205-686-0010-00 2572 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2572. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,515.oo 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 9.2123 3 KNOP MARY K ASSESSABLE FEET: 100 24-205-686-0012-00 2566 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2566. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,515.oo 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 9.2123 4 MCMILLEN DONALD JR/GLENNA ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-205-686-0014-00 2550 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2550. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.6062 5 SHIELDS JAMES J ASSESSABLE FEET: 49 24-205-685-0011-00 2586 FOUNTAIN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2586. FOUNTAINS MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,722.35 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.5140 6 BENEDICT VICTORIA ASSESSABLE FEET: 49.84 24-205-685-0012-00 2520 W SHERMAN BL VD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2520. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,751.88 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.5914 7 OPLINGER PAUL/SHEILA E ASSESSABLE FEET: 52.74 24-205-685-0013-00 2516 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2516. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ~I_$_1_,8_5_3._81~ PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.8586 1/30/2004 Page 1 of 3 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. 8 LAIRD DONALD R TRUST ASSESSABLE FEET: 51.75 24-205-685-0014-00 2510 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2510. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: LI _$_1.:,_,8_19_.0_1....., PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.7674 9 HALLMAN WENDELL M ASSESSABLE FEET: 49.74 24-205-685-0015-00 2500 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2500. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,748.36 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.5822 10 KAMP PAUL ASSESSABLE FEET: 51.75 24-205-685-0016-00 2494 W SHERMAN BL VD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2494. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ._I _$_1.:....,8_19_.0_1__, PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.7674 11 MASKELL ROBERT M ASSESSABLE FEET: 51.74 24-205-685-0017-00 2488 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2488. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,818.66 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.7665 12 JACOBSON MARK L ASSESSABLE FEET: 49.74 24-205-685-0018-00 2480 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2480. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,748.36 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.5822 13 BARDING JACK ASSESSABLE FEET: 51.7 24-205-685-0019-00 2474 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2474. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,811.25 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.7628 14 MORTENSON MARGARET C ASSESSABLE FEET: 50 24-205-685-0020-00 2587 GROVE ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2587. GROVE ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.6062 1/30/2004 Page 2 of 3 RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004 SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. ONSTOTT MELVIN ASSESSABLE FEET: 100 15 24-205-670-0007-00 2442 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2442. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,515.oo I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 9.2123 ASSESSABLE FEET: 47 16 HARKER ANNE M 24-205-670-0009-00 2432 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2432. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,652.05 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.3298 ASSESSABLE FEET: 75 17 MOAT JOSEPH B 24-205-670-0010-00 836 DYKSTRA RD COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2414. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49445 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,636.25 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 6.9093 MUSKEGON COUNTRY CLUB ASSESSABLE FEET: 0 18 24-205-694-0001-00 2801 LAKESHORE DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15 @ 2801. LAKESHOR MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $0.00 I PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.0000 SUM OF ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE: 1085.50 SUM OF ESTIMATED P.O. COST: $38. 155.33 I TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE PARCELS 18.00 1/30/2004 Page 3 of 3 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By · FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To reiUrn this card by maii, simpiy fuid un tlie dotted iines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2520 W SHERMAN BLVD Parcel Number 24-205-685-0012-00 Assessable Frontage: $49.84 Feet RECEIVED Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot J:Tp rl / ''--'.' ( ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,751.88 City Clerks Office Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 E 1 FT LOT 11 ALL LOT 12 EXE 1.16 FT BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING Your VO\e COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR )\ • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. ,·;::,:u ., _ o_ \0.,&; ~ CoOwner/Spouse I AM OPPOSED 00 Signature \ , ) \f\'l,\\l:S,:>,4~:?J\\ ~ \ Signature ------------ Address ✓- < r,,c,> J::} 1 ·, U,..J , 0 \, ,-)\\9,j\ 'IT:,,t, \ \ Address Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 6 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: · H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To ·--c··---------·- - -cs· ,-felU-f1YtfliS"C8tCrbSTYtf8ff~--sititply ·roiti -Off the dotted iin8s so lhEf address tJ"t1- tile ·r-e·v~fge-:gi'd"Ef is showing. Be sure to sea.I the forrn with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2442 W SHERMAN BLVD Parcel Number 24-205-670-0007-00 Assessable Frontage: $100.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost:. · $35.15 per Foot .RECEIVED ESTIMATE[) TOTAL cost $3,515.00 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON · c· Clerks Office REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOTS 7 & 8 BLK 670 & S 112 OF VACATED ALLEY ABUTTING SAID LOTS Your vote COUNTS! I AM IN FAVOR • · Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED ~ o_wner . . Signature ·. /vf~ ~~-IP~_ ~c1f$&~ 1 .= oOwn~r/Spouse Signature Address ~';(,t;&,;'.i ~c{4rlt Address ----------------- Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 15 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Title: Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forWarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To ··return this cartl i:Yy mail, sirtipiy foidot1 ihe Jolted lines so the address on the reverse side is- ·~'-· showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2500 W SHERMAN BLVD Parcel Number 24-205-685-0015-00 Assessable Frontage: $49.74 Feet $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED Estimated Front Foot Cost: ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,748.36 Property Description c Clerks Office CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 E 46.67 FT LOT 15 & LOT 16 EXE 46.93 FT BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING lour vote COUNTS! Owner I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street PaVing Project. ____________ CoOwner/Spouse I AM OPPOSED rx I ~"'="(;)\~\\,/-,..,, .. ·.· • Signature Signature V,l'mt,J;t . jki~ . Address Address ,o 5 Oo . w', J)zldDl/,Vll ·.·.····~ Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. "?nu~· ~ 'Y:;: 111 4 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR!' OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONS'fRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. 10 · •· ~ •• · return this card by maii, sifnpiy fold on ihe ciolle<l lines su the addrnss on the teverse side Is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJEC'f. Assessment Information Property Address: 2432.W SHERMAN BLVD Parcel Number 24-205-670-0009-00 Assessable Frontage: · $47.00 Feet· Estimated Front F=oot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED ESTIMATED .T0TAL COST . $1,652.05 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON City Clerks Office REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOT 9 & S 112 OF VACATED ALLEY ABUTTING BLK 670 Your vote COUNTS< j/1)!1 e 111, llcu, f!.e;-;, IN FAVOR • · . , 1 ..JL1J Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.. I AM I AM OPPOSED rz::l Owner i~VJ/..41.tl JJ; ~,,,;f;~,.j CoOwner/Spouse Signature . (t;;_.µ.-?Jt..·~I.,,, 71,,.· 1 ; Signatum ---------------;....,.--- Address Address . Thank you for taking ihe time to vote on this importan-t-is-su_e.;.._........---.-,.-,___....._1_6___ .SPECIAL. ASSE:SSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD (\JC) RESPONSECOUNTS AS 0IN FAVOR'' OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, plEl~Sa . . Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 ·• ··Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO ~EACH ST. •• .. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION . INSTRUCTIONS If yi:Ju.wishtohave your written vote included as part of the tabulationof votesforward'ed to . the City Commission for the sche.duled pubHc hearing, please return this card bythe c:Jate · indicated above ..·To use this response card please indicatewhetheryou Oppose or i"~yor this spedal assessment project,sign the form andreturn it to the City Clerk's Office. ·. returhtnis card by ma11, simpiy foid Ufftl1e dotted lines so the-<idd1e.,s unttwrev&rse:s{!1e1iiri•-"~•cC.'T · ro. showing .. Be sure to seal the form. withJl small piece of tape or staple prior to ma.iijtir;j;,IF . . YOUDONOTSENDIN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF . •. PROJECT.. . . Assessment· Irifcfrmatlon Property Address: 2586 FOUNTAIN ST Parcel Number 24°205~685°0011-QQ Assessable Frontage: $49.00 Feet . Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 · per Fdqf RECEIVE • .· ESTIMATED T6tAL COST $1;722.35 FEB (l[,; · Property Description Ci1y Clerks Offlco1 ·.·· CITY oFMUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 . . .. LOTH EXE 1 FT BLK685 ALSO S 1/2 OFVAC.ALLEY ,'\BUTTING Your VOie COUNTS! . . Please vote either infavor or oppbsed to the Special Assess merit street P~ving<Ptcije~L . l•AMINFAVOR[J IAMOPPOSED· 1>?1 ·Owh!;lr Owner/Spouse ________.,..,......, ...............-........_...... Signature'•._· ~!C~~~-2~1.t!!.~-:V Signature Address · · Address . Thi:fnkyollfor taking the time fovote on this important issue, · , ,,.,' , 5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by maii, sil'npiy foiU tu I the duUeU lint:!;:, so the addtess vi-• th..:.. . _. . . . 1·3e side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2474 W SHERMAN BLVD Parcel Number 24-205-685-0019-00 Assessable Frontage: $51.70 Feet RECEIVED Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,817.26 City Clerks Office Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 E 43.7 FT LOT 19 & LOT 20 EXE 50 FT BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING Your vote CUUNIS! I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED~ Owner Signature Address 13 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. ' < - ~ 0r? ~ d CZ 0 a-<-£¼.17v-?-n ,4Jff; ~4-t-~ ?hi 11-i--e~~ a- q ~ ~~ /4 z~ a,o ,;;:;/J " SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return tnis card by maii, sirnµiy foid 0i·1 the dotted lines sc the address on the reverse sirle is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2572 W SHERMAN BLVD Parcel Number 24-205-686-0010-00 Assessable Frontage: $100.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,515.00 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON City Clerks Office REVISED PLAT OF 1903 LOTS 10 AND 11 BLK 686 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ADJ THERETO Your vote COUNTS! • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM IN FAVOR .-\ / I AM OPPOSED~ Owner £ tl '1' e /\. 't Lu'. 'a,_ 'l , <J CoOwner/Spouse Signature (~_,i4 ..r , ;, · .~.,.(;:?,7/~ature r . Address ~) i:; 'J ~3 [,(I ·•-ii< ,LCt''<v-.J Address 2 11V\M l\.>-.,-'--",,--~'U,y•,_<l.,_ ·_/\ . ) - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by mail, s1mp1y fold on me dotted iines so the address on the reverse side is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2587 GROVE ST RECEIVED Parcel Number 24-205-685-0020-00 FEfl (\ r, Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet City Clerks Office Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEGON RECEIVED REVISED PLAT OF 1903 E 50 Ff LOT ?.O BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING FEB 9 2004 by Muskegon County Your vote COUNTS! • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED [±] Owner --· ·. !A./i it; -i: (.7!.\'v},Ci!r :, CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 1 Signature-{'.f_ t:!Jul:c! 71;.::.·0~~~,1:/ ; Signature Address '_J_j:1 ] (l /\,<..' J r.c: S/ i~ 0 0 /;- Address 14 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD. , LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special a~;sessrnent project., sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by maii, simply foid on ihe lio iLt:d iir1es ~u lht:: adur~6s ;:>n the i·c··1ei·s;:; side ls showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information RECEIVED Property Address: 2494 W SHERMAN BLVD CITY OF MUSKEGON Parcel Number 24-205-685-0016-00 FEB O9 2004 Assessable Frontage: $51. 75 Feet ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,819.0'1 . Property Description ·RECEIVED CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903 FEB OA JMk . E 46.93 FT LOT '16 & LOT 17 EX E 45.1 8 FT BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING Cl Cl.erks Office Your vote COUNTS! I AM IN FAVOR /1 • 7 ---2 / -- / . Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED IXf Owner .:r_.VrY'./:~ ~/2 a -T Ow~~r/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Signature tll. :-~ :✓--· /.., ~-l/ / .:>Ignature Address 10 Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING RESPONSE CARD NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Project Number: H 1531 Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION INSTRUCTIONS If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To return this card by maii, sirr1piy fuk.i on ti~,e Uotted lines so the addiess on the reverse s!do is showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT. Assessment Information Property Address: 2550 W SHERMAN BLVD Parcel Number 24-205-686-0014-00 Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet Estimated Front Foot Cost: · $35.15 per Foot ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50 Property Description CITY OF MUSKEG ------~-- -·c-;;:::=---, REVISED PLAT OF 1903RECEIVE-o LOT 14 BLK 686 A SO S 1/2 OF VAC ALL Y ADJ THERETO , r!1 City Clerks Office our vote COUNTS! I AM IN FAVOR • Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project. I AM OPPOSED ~ Owner ()N, ;,- [ .( C /•y( ((__ W\ ' 1l e/v CoOwner/Spouse G,l 0 '" ,:t, ;+ -P;;). f!}l c., )'V/ f /{ {; ,o Signature ' C-QL'? J £ (:7 IJ\Wc-l/\LLll"--. Signature .j,(1:Jc/:'.b•<-/ /2' J?7 ';./} 'k(tL,,.J Address rM<o Lt' s ;1--c, 1¼1'111 JV Address .).,$(Sc L,i), S )fEP-,1½ t"I 1v Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 4 (!) c.2¥~1~( ) ~,,£, ''l..) / ' ~~? '~~PC -~ ;?;Jf~ft~'7 ifl 3 /- 73~5-vff 7 Y H-1531 SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST. PROPERTY OWNER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TABULATION FEET PERCENTAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS -18 FOR OPPOSE LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET LETTER#ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE 1085.500 1<W-k 5 2586 FOUNTAIN 24-205-685-0011-00 49.00 14 2587 GROVE 24-205-685-0020-00 50.00 FRONT FEET OPPOSED 547.33 50.42% (.oO, / 4" ·"fe 16 2432 SHERMAN 24-205-670-0009-00 47.00 15 2442 SHERMAN 24-205-670-0007 -00 100.00 RESPONDING FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 0.000 0.00% 10 2494 SHERMAN 24-205-685-0016-00 51.75 9 2500 SHERMAN 24-205-685-0015-00 49.74 NOT RESPONDING - FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 538.170 49.58% 6 2520 SHERMAN 24-205-665-0012-00 49.84 4 2550 SHERMAN 24-205-086-0014-00 50.00 TOTAL FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 538.170 49.58% 2 2572 SHERMAN 24-205-686-0010-00 100.00 q ;;,. " cc 0 "- 'f;- () t- s ~ C q q _., ~ C ,o C " C 0 \ = "-- "-- ( < s'. ----bz -? • .2 ~ ) ~ t C ci ' ) § ~ " ~ 1 t _..I, ) T,LS ~ -2 j '{_ -~ 's...'; -7) <J <::) _; • 0.00 547.33 ""'=--,· l"' 0 C V) V] i'. ~- ~ vi. ) C ~ _j) c- ,--;;: -~ -" -:-t) _£ ;";) d r..., c'"l ~':,- ~= -? u"'; ;;J .L 1./·; so ~ ~ -· -~ ,_;, ~ -:] q (.J "2.l ·""11 TABULATED AS OF: 04:35 PM ! (Q ✓ .2. v rt €J ( id) ·0 ,:'-~ C,, ·C\ -J >,,) ~ 9 Q 2/10/20044:35 PMTABULATION OF THE RESPONSES TO THE SP. ASS. HEARING ON SHERMAN c.-;:p .J; Commission Meeting Date: January 27, 2004 Date: January 16, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Planning & Economic Development CfoC RE: Rezoning request for property located at 407 Marquette Ave. (SE comer of Marquette Ave. and Wood St.) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request to rezone property located at 407 Marquette Ave., at the SE corner of Marquette Ave. and Wood St., from R-1, Single-Family Residential to B-1, Limited Business. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the request due to lack of compliance with the future land use map and Master Land Use Plan. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted to deny the request at their 1/15 meeting. Commissioners Spataro, Aslakson, Johnson and Sartorius voted for denial, Commissioners Michalski and Smith voted against denial, and Commissioners Mazade and Warmington abstained. T. Harryman was absent. 1/16/2004 ROLL CALL/ACTION SHEET (9 PRESENT NAME ACTION A YES NAYS COMMENT Commissioner Sheoherd ./ Commissioner Soataro M ✓ I. " Mavor Warmington ✓ .- ....J..... Commissioner Carter ./ ~ [' n Commissioner Davis ✓ r -~ Commissioner Gawron C, ./ ~ I ./l. Vice Mavor Larson ✓ 1'\""- V ROLL CALL/ACTION SHEET PRESENT NAME ACTION AYES NAYS COMMENT -p· Commissioner Soataro / Mavor Wannington ✓ Commissioner Catier ./ Q.,fl-,()/\ <Y.' n - • A A > .: Commissioner Davis c., ✓ 'V (} .(] Commissioner Gawron ✓ " I' Vice Mavor Larson Y\ ✓ . IJ·' Commissioner Shenherd CITY OF MUSKEGON MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICIDGAN ORDINANCE NO. _ _ __ An ordinance to amend the zoning map of the City to provide for a zone change for certain property from R-1 "Single-Family Residential" to B-1 "Limited Business" THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON HEREBY ORDAINS: The zoning map of the City of Muskegon is hereby amended to change the zoning of the following described prope1ty from R-1 "Single-Family" to B-1 "Limited Business": CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903, LOTS 4 & 5 BLK 12 This ordinance adopted: Ayes: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Nayes:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Adoption Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Effective Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ First Reading: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Second Reading: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ CITY OF MUSKEGON By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Gail A. Kundinger, MMC, City Clerk 2/5/04 CERTIFICATE (Rezoning of 407 Marquette from R-1 to B-1) The nndersigned, being the duly qualified clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Michigan, does hereby ce1tify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of an ordinance adopted by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, at a regular meeting of the City Commission on the l 0th day of February, 2004, at which meeting a quorum was present and remained throughout, aud that the original of said ordinance is on file in the records of the City of Muskegon. I fmther ce1tify that the meeting was conducted and public notice was given pursuant to and in full compliance with Act No. 267, Public Acts of Michigan of 1976, as amended, and that minutes were kept and will be or have been made available as required thereby. DATED:------~ 2004. Gail A. Kundinger, MMC Clerk, City of Muskegon Publish: Notice of Adoption to be published once within ten (10) days of final adoption. 2/5/04 2 CITY OF MUSKEGON NOTICE OF ADOPTION Please take notice that on Febrnary I 0, 2004, the City Commission of the City of Muskegon adopted an ordinance amending the zoning map to provide for the change of zoning of the following property from R-1 "Single-Family Residential" to B-1 "Limited Business": CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903, LOTS 4 & 5 BLK 12 Copies of the ordinance may be viewed and purchased at reasonable cost at the Office of the City Clerk in the City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, during regular business hours. This ordinance amendment is effective ten days from the date of this publication. Published _ _ _ _ _ _ _~2004 CITY OF MUSKEGON By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Gail A. Kundinger, MMC City Clerk PUBLISH ONCE WITHIN TEN (1 OJ DAYS OF FINAL PASSAGE. Account No. 101-80400-5354 2/5/04 3 ~ ::;: " ~ City of Muskegon Planning Commission w-¢-, Case # 2004-01 ~ , ,,/os, I / !ti / H 111111 ('1 I I t.ULU R•- 1 1111 1~ ~ ::.::.''.""""' osc ~ ~ ,·r I PJ I 111111d ~' n-7/l l '~ ,': , , 11! 111 ;;;,;r I A 1 ~1 I 1111 R·1 !/ 600 O 600 1200 Feet "' Staff Report [EXCERPT) CITY OF MUSKEGON PLANNJNG COMMISSION REGULAR MEETJNG January 15, 2004 Hearing; Case 2004-1: Request to rezone the property located at 407 Marquette Ave. from R-1, Single-Family Residential to B-1, Limited Business, by Ray Reasonover. BACKGROUND 1. This request includes the property atthe southeast corner of Marquette Ave. and Wood St. The property cmrnntly contains a small 'corner store' type of mini-mmt and additional vacant space. There are two special use permits in place on this prope1ty- one for the mini-mmt and a second for a youth recreational center which has never materialized. 2. The subject prope1ty is cmrently zoned R-1, Single-Family Residential. The Zoning Ordinance was amended several yem·s ago to allow existing previously nonconforming commercial structures in residential districts to be used for various low-scale commercial uses. This lm1guage is how the special use permits on the subject prope1ty were approved. The intent of this language is to allow some practical use for these buildings which would not likely be either renovated or torn down for residential uses and would otherwise sit vacant. The language also allows smale scale, low intensity uses, similar to those allowed in the B-1, Limited Business zoning district, in or near neighborhoods. This helps to promote the idea of 'neighborhood businesses'. 3. When the language was included that allowed these commercial buildings to be used commercially in residential zones, several conditions were also included. One of these conditions is that ce1tain types of uses m·e prohibited under this language, "Prohibited uses: Activities specifically prohibited include repair or service ofmotor vehicles and other large equipment; uses serving or selling alcohol, manufacturing processes which would normally require industrial zoning; any activity which may become a nuisance due to noise, unsightliness or odor; and any activity which may adversely affect surrounding property." 4. When the Special Use Pennit was approved for the mini-mart in August of 2001, one of the conditions of the pennit reinforced the prohibition against selling alcohol on the site. At the tinle, the property owner stated that he had no intention of selling alcohol in the store. However, since that time the prope1ty has changed hands and the store has a new owner/operator. The current owner would like to sell alcohol in the store. 5. As the sale of alcohol is prohibited on this site both by the ordinance language allowing the prope1ty to be re-used commercially and by the approved Special Use Pe1mit for this property, the applicant is asking that the prope1ty be rezoned to a commercial designation. The prohibition against alcohol sales does not appem· in the B-1 district language - it was added specifically to the special use permit language for commercial buildings in residential districts. If the property were to be rezoned to B-1 and the Special Use Permit were dissolved (since the use of the property as a 1/16/04 4 store would be allowed in the B-1 dish-ict by tight, the Special Use Permit would no longer be necessaiy), then the applicant would be free to seek a liquor license in order to sell alcohol on the property. 6. The City owns several vacant parcels of property directly adjacent to the subject property. This comer is a somewhat busy one since Mai·quette Ave. and Wood St. each carry a heavier load of traffic than a minor residential street. To the south of the subject property is an existing church. Although this general area is entirely zoned for single-family residential, this particulai· block does not contain any existing homes. However, given the recent level of increased interest in the Jackson Hill neighborhood for single-fainily building projects, there is a good likelihood that the City-owned parcels may be in demand in the near future for single-fainily residential pmposes. 7. The closest area to the subject property which is already currently zoned for commercial use is at the corner of Marquette Ave. and Getty St., where there is some B-1 zoning. There is not much commercial zoning existing within the Jackson Hill neighborhood. The subject property is located at probably the busiest corner in this neighborhood. If any commercial zoning were to be located in this neighborhood, the subject property would probably be the most practical spot for it. However, the zoning ordinance does permit small scale commercial use on this property without it needing to be rezoned, and the special use permit language is even more resh-ictive than the B-1 dish·ict, which helps to further protect the smTounding neighb01110od. 8. The Fuhn·e Land Use Map shows the subject property as "Single & Two-Fainily". 9. The Master Land Use Plan states: • It is the goal of the Master Plan to maintain the residential integrity of the sub-area, while setting aside small segments suitable for commercial and indush-ial uses in a highly compatible, non- threatening, fashion. • Single-fainily homes are found throughout the sub-ai·ea including many new homes located in the Marquette neighborhood. They range from well to poorly maintained dwellings. Sub-Area 12 has the highest concentration of homes experiencing significant site deterioration. A variety of schools and churches are interspersed tlu·oughout and compliment the residential flavor of the area. 10. The Master Plan recommends for this sub-area: • Clustered commercial development should be confined to the US-31 and Getty Street intersections, consistent with similar development identified in Sub-Areas 3 and 4. 1/16/04 5 PHOTOS / , / _/ / / / ORDINANCE EXCERPTS ARTICLE IV - RONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PREAMBLE These districts are designed to be composed of low density residential development. The regulations are intended to stabilize, protect, and encourage the residential character of the district and prohibit activities not compatible with a residential neighborhood. Development is limited to single family dwellings and such other uses as schools, parks, churches, and ce1iain public facilities which serve residents of the district. ft is the intent of these districts to recognize that the City of Muskegon has been developed and platted with some lots that are smaller than those found in recently urbanized communities, and the standards in Section 2 100 reflect residential development standards that the citizens of Muskegon find to be compatible. SECTION 400: PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED 1/16/04 6 In R, One Family Residential, Districts no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, structurally altered, or occupied except for one or more of the following specified uses, unless otherwise provided in this Ordinance; 1. One Family detached dwellings. 2. Home occupations of a non-indusn·ial nature may be pennitted. Permissible home occupations include, but are not limited to the following: [amended 11/02] 2. Adult Foster Care Family Homes, provided that such facilities shall be at least one thousand five hundred (1,500) feet from any other similar facility. [amended 11/02] 3. Accessory buildings and accessmy uses customarily incidental to any of the above Principal Uses Permitted. 4. Uses similar to the above Principal Uses Permitted. SECTION 401: SPECIAL LAND USES PERMTITED [amended2/02j The following uses, and their accessory buildings and access01y uses, shall be permitted under the purview of Section 2332 after review and approval of the use (and a site plan, if required) by the Planning Commission, after Public Hearing, subject to the applicable conditions, and any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Planning Commission: I. Private recreational areas, and institutional recreational centers when not operated for profit, and nonprofit swimming pool clubs, all subject to the following conditions: [amended 2/02] 2. Colleges, universities, and other such institutions of higher learning, public and private, offering courses in general, technical, or religious education not operated for profit, all subject to the following conditions: 3. Churches and other facilities normally incidental thereto subject to the following conditions: 4. Elementary, intermediate, and/or secondary schools offering courses in general education, provided such uses are set back thitty (30) feet from any lot in a residential zone. 5. Cemeteries. 6. Previously existing or established commercial uses not ah-early converted to a residential use may be authorized under Special Use Penni! for the following [amended 12/99]: 7. Accessmy buildings and accessory uses customarily incidental to any of the above Special Land Uses Permitted. 8. Uses similar to the above Special Land Uses Permitted. 1/16/04 7 SECTION 402: [RESERVED] [amended8/01] SECTION 403: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OPTION [amended 12/97] SECTION 404: AREA AND BULK REQUIREMENTS [amended 4/00] ARTICLE X- B-1 LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICTS PREAMBLE The B-1 Limited Business Districts are designed primarily for the convenience of persons residing in adjacent residential areas or neighborhoods, and to pennit only such uses as are necessary to satisfy those limited basic, daily shopping and/or service needs, which by their ve1y nature are not similar to the shopping patterns of the B-2 convenience and Comparison, B-3 Central Business Diso·ict, and B-4 General Business Districts. B-1 Districts are also intended to be utilized at planned locations in the City as zones of transition between major thoroughfares and residential areas, and between intensive nonresidential areas and residential areas. In the B-1 District all business establishments shall be retail and/or service establishments dealing directly with consumers. All goods produced on the premises shall be sold at retail on tlie premises where produced. All business, servicing or processing, except off-street parking or loading, shall be conducted witl1in a completely enclosed building, or in an area specifically approved by the City. SECTION 1000: PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED In a B-1 Limited Business District no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, shucturally altered, or occupied except for one (1) or more of the following specified uses, unless othe1wise provided for in this Ordinance: I. Any generally recognized retail business which supplies new conunodities on the premises for persons residing in adjacent residential areas such as: groceries, meats, daily products, baked goods or other foods, drugs, drygoods, and notions or hardware. No individual uses, either freestanding or in a group of uses, shall exceed two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in area. 2. Any personal service establishment which pe1fonns services on the premises for persons residing in adjacent residential areas, such as: Shoe repair, d1y cleaning shops, tailor shops, beauty parlors, barber shops, dressmaker, tailor, phannacist, or an establishment doing radio, television, or home appliance repair, and similar establishments that require a retail character no more objectionable than the aforementioned, subject to the provision that no more than five (5) persons shall be employed at any time in the sale, repair, or other processing of goods. 3. Professional offices of doctors, lawyers, dentists, chiropractors, osteopaths, architects, engineers, accountants, and similar or allied professions. No individual use shall exceed two tliousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in area. 4. Office buildings for any of tl1e following types of occupations: executive, administrative and professional. No individual use shall exceed two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in area. 5. Residential uses as pmt of a building in tliis zone shall be allowed upon issuance of a Ce1tificate of Occupancy from the Department of inspections, provided that the minimum lot area requirements of the RM-1 Diso·ict are met. 6. Accessory buildings and accessmy uses customarily incidental to any of the above Principal Uses Permitted. 7. Uses similar to the above Principal Uses Pennitted. 1/16104 8 SECTION I 00 I: SPECIAL LAND USES PERMITTED The following area, and their accessory buildings and accessory uses, shall be permitted under the purview of Section 2332 after review and approval of the use ( and a site plan, if required) by the Planning Commission, after Public Hearing, subject to the applicable conditions and any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Planning Commission. A site plan shall not be required when there are no external changes made to the buildings or propetties. 1. Restaurants, or other places serving food, except drive-in or drive-through restaurants. 2. Churches and other facilities normally incidental thereto subject to tl1e following conditions: 3. Accessoty buildings and accessoty uses customarily incidental to the above Special Land Uses Permitted. 4. Uses similar to the above Special Land Uses Permitted. SECTION 1002: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SECTION 1003: AREAANDBULKREQUIREMENTS [amended4/00) RECOMMENDATION B-1 is intended as a 'neighborhood' commercial zoning designation, and only allows small scale, low intensity commercial uses. The square footage of most permitted uses in the B-1 district is limited to 2,500 square feet. If the Planning and City Commissions were inclined to approve a rezoning for this property to a commercial designation, staff would feel most comf011able with the B-1 district there. However, since the existing ordinance language and special use permit do allow small scale commercial uses (including the c1ment use) at this site without a rezoning, staff would recommend denial of this request. DELIBERATION Criteria-based questions typically asked during a rezoning include: I. What, if any, identifiable conditions related to the petition have changed which justify the petitioned change in zoning. 2. What are the precedents and the possible effects of precedent which might result from the approval or denial of the petition. 3. What is the impact of the amendment on the ability of the city to provide adequate public services and facilities and/or programs that might reasonably be required in the future if the petition is approved. 1/16/04 9 4. Does the petitioned zoning change adversely affect the environmental conditions or value of the surrounding property. 5. Does the petitioned zoning change generally comply with the adopted Fnture Land Use Plan of the City. 6. Are there any significant negative environmental impacts which would reasonably occur if the petitioned zoning change and resulting allowed structures were built such as: a. Surface water drainage problems b. Waste water disposal problems c. Adverse effect on suiface or subsuiface water quality d. The loss of valuable natural resources such as forest, wetland, historic sites, or wildlife areas. 1/16/04 10 Date: February 1 o, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Engineering RE: City- MOOT Agreement for: Sherman Blvd. Lincoln to Beach SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the attached contract with MOOT for the reconstruction of Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln to Beach Street and to approve the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract. FINANCIAL IMPACT: MDOT's participation is estimated at $355,830 but not to exceed 81.85% of eligible cost. The estimated total cost of the project, including the none participating items of engineering and watermain, is $550,000. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. The City's share of the cost will come out of the Major Street and water funds as was budgeted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the attached agreement and resolution be approved. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: RESOLUTION 2004-20 (a) RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF MUSKEGON FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF SHERMAN BLVD. FROM LINCOLN STREET TO BEACH STREET ALONG WITH SOME WATER MAIN WORK TOGETHER WITH THE NECESSARY RELATED WORK AND AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR STEPHEN J. WARMINGTON AND CITY CLERK GAIL A KUNDINGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT Moved by Vice Mayor Larson and supported by Commissioner_G_a_w_r_o_n_ _ _ _ _ _ _ that the following Resolution be adopted: WHEREAS, entry by the City of Muskegon into Contract no. 04-5014 between the Michigan Department of Transportation and the City of Muskegon for the reconstruction of Sherman Blvd from Lincoln to Beach St. within the City is in the best interests of the City of Muskegon. RESOLVED, that entry by the City into Contract Agreement Number 04-5014 be and the same is hereby authorized and approved and the Mayor and Clerk are authorized to execute said contract for and on behalf of the City of Muskegon. Adopted this 1 0th day of February , 2004. BY ATTEST Gail A Kundinger, City Clerk CERTIFICATION This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10 , 2004. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976. STATE OF MICHIGAN JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GLORIA J. JEFF GOVERNOR DIRECTOR LANSING January 30, 20044 Ms. Gail Kundinger Clerk City of Muskegon 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536 RECEIVED CITY OF MUSKEGON Muskegon,MI 49443-0536 FEB 04 200\ Dear Ms. Kundinger: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RE: MDOT Contract No.: 04-5014 Control Section: STUL 6 I 407 Job Number: 56377 Enclosed is the original and one copy of the above described contract between your organization and the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). Please take time to read and understand this contract. If this contract meets with your approval, please complete the following checklist: PLEASE DO NOT DATE THE CONTRACTS. MDOTwill date the contracts when they are executed. A contract is not executed unless it has been signed by both parties. _ Secure the necessary signatures on all contracts. Include a certified resolution. The resolution should specifically name the officials who are authorized to sign the contracts. _ Return all copies of the contracts to my attention of the Department's Design Division, 2 nd floor for MOOT execution. A copy of the executed contract will be forwarded to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (517) 335-2264. Sincerely, <--~'Li..v ~Vt.bl__,/ Jackie Burch Contract Processing Specialist Design Support Area Enclosure MURRAY D. VAN WAGONER BUILDING• P,O. BOX 30050 · LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 www.michigan.gov • {517) 373-2090 LH-LAN-0 (01/03) STATE OF MICHIGAN JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GLORIA J. JEFF GOVERNOR DIRECTOR LANSING March 1, 20044 Ms. Gail Kundinger Clerk City of Muskegon 933 Terrace Street P.O. Box 536 Muskegon,MI 49443-0536 Dear Ms. Kundinger: RB: MDOT Contract Number: 04-5014 Control Section: STUL 61407 Job Number: 56377 Enclosed is a fully executed copy of the above noted agreement. Sincerely, ~~ fS,u,1,.dl- Jackie Burch Contract Processing Specialist Design Support Area Enclosure Cc: M. Harbison, Design Support Area Project Accounting, Financial Operations Division Grand Region Engineer MURRAY D. VAN WAGONER BUILDING• P.O. BOX 30050 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 www.michigan.gov • (517) 373-2090 LH-LAN-0 (01/03) ~--~~c;--;;=-·· STP RECEIVED CITY OF MUSKEGON DIR Control Section STUL 61407 FEB 2 0 2001t Job Number 56377 Project STP 0461 (308) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Federal Item No. HH3843 CFDANo. 20.205 Contract No. 04-5014 PART I THIS CONTRACT, consisting of PART I and PART II (Standard Agreement Provisions), is made and entered into this date of FEB ~- 7 2004 by and between the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter referred to as the "DEPARTMENT"; and the CITY OF MUSKEGON, a Michigan municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "REQUESTING PARTY"; for the purpose of fixing the rights and obligations of the parties in agreeing to the following improvements, in the City of Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT" and estimated in detail on EXHIBIT "I", dated January 16, 2004, attached hereto and made a part hereof: PART A-FEDERAL PARTICIPATION Hot mix asphalt paving work along Sherman Boulevard from Lincoln Street to Beach Street; including pavement removal, grading, drainage structure adjustment, and permanent pavement marking work; and all together with necessary related work. PART B - NO FEDERAL PARTICIPATION Watermain work along Sherman Boulevard from Lincoln Street to Beach Street; and all together with necessary related work. WITNESS ETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal law, monies have been provided for the performance of certain improvements on public roads; and WHEREAS, the reference "FHWA" in PART I and PART II refers to the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; and WHEREAS, the PROJECT, or portions of the PROJECT, at the request of the REQUESTING PARTY, are being progranuned with the FHWA, for implementation with the use of Federal Funds under the following Federal program(s) or funding: SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 I WHEREAS, the parties hereto have reached an understanding with each other regarding the performance of the PROJECT work and desire to set forth this understanding in the form of a written contract. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual undertakings of the parties and in conformity with applicable law, it is agreed: 1. The parties hereto shall undertake and complete the PROJECT in accordance with the terms of this contract. 2. The term "PROJECT COST", as herein used, is hereby defined as the cost of the physical construction necessary for the completion of the PROJECT. Costs for construction engineering and inspection incurred by the DEPARTMENT will be charged 100 percent to the REQUESTING PARTY. Any other costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT as a result of this contract will be at PROJECT COST. The costs incurred by the REQUESTING PARTY for preliminary engineering, construction engineering and inspection, and right-of-way are excluded from the PROJECT COST as defined by this contract. 3. The DEPARTMENT is authorized by the REQUESTING PARTY to administer on behalf of the REQUESTING PARTY all phases of the PROJECT including advertising and awarding the construction contract for the PROJECT or portions of the PROJECT. Such administration shall be in accordance with PART II, Section II of this contract. Any items of the PROJECT COST incurred by the DEPARTMENT may be charged to the PROJECT. 4. The REQUESTING PARTY, at no cost to the PROJECT or to the DEPARTMENT, shall: A. Design or cause to be designed the plans for the PROJECT. B. Appoint a project engineer who shall be in responsible charge of the PROJECT and ensure that the plans and specifications are followed. C. Perform or cause to be performed the construction engineering and inspection services necessary for the completion of the PROJECT. The REQUESTING PARTY will furnish the DEPARTMENT proposed timing sequences for trunkline signals that, if any, are being made part of the improvement. No timing adjustments shall be made by the REQUESTING PARTY at any trunkline intersection, without prior issuances by the DEPARTMENT of Standard Traffic Signal Timing Permits. 09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 2 5. The PROJECT COST shall be met in accordance with the following: PART A Federal Surface Transportation Funds shall be applied to the eligible items of the PART A portion of the PROJECT COST at the established Federal participation ratio equal to 81.85 percent up to an amount not to exceed $355,830. The balance of the PART A portion of the PROJECT COST, after deduction of Federal Funds, shall be charged to and paid by the REQUESTING PARTY in the manner and at the times hereinafter set forth. PARTB The PART B portion of the PROJECT COST is not eligible for Federal participation and shall be charged to and paid 100 percent by the REQUESTING PARTY in the manner and at the times hereinafter set forth. Any items of PROJECT COST not reimbursed by Federal Funds will be the sole responsibility of the REQUESTING PARTY. 6. No working capital deposit will be required for this PROJECT. In order to fulfill the obligations assumed by the REQUESTING PARTY under the provisions of this contract, the REQUESTING PARTY shall make prompt payments of its share of the PROJECT COST upon receipt of progress billings from the DEPARTMENT as herein provided. All payments will be made within 30 days of receipt of billings from the DEPARTMENT. Billings to the REQUESTING PARTY will be based upon the REQUESTING PARTY'S share of the actual costs incurred less Federal Funds earned as the PROJECT progresses. In the event of any discrepancies between PART I and PART II of this contract, the provisions of PART I shall prevail. 7. Upon completion of construction of the PROJECT, the REQUESTING PARTY will promptly cause to be enacted and enforced such ordinances or regulations as may be necessary to prohibit parking in the roadway right-of-way throughout the limits of the PROJECT. 8. The performance of the entire PROJECT under this contract, whether Federally funded or not, will be subject to the provisions and requirements of PART II that are applicable to a Federally funded project. 09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/20/04 3 9. The REQUESTING PARTY certifies that a) it is a person under 1995 PA 71 and is not aware of and has no reason to believe that the property is a facility as defined in MSA 13A.20101(1)(1); b) the REQUESTING PARTY further certifies that it has completed the tasks required by MCL 324.20126 (3)(h); MSA 13A.20126(3)(h); c) it conducted a visual inspection of property within the existing right of way on which construction is to be performed to determine if any hazardous substances were present; and at sites on which historically were located businesses that involved hazardous substances, it performed a reasonable investigation to determine whether hazardous substances exist. This reasonable investigation should include, at a minimum, contact with local, state and federal environmental agencies to determine if the site has been identified as, or potentially as, a site containing hazardous substances; d) it did not cause or contribute to the release or threat of release of any hazardous substance found within the PROJECT limits. The REQUESTING PARTY also certifies that, in addition to reporting the presence of any hazardous substances to the Department of Environmental Quality, it has advised the DEPARTMENT of the presence of any and all hazardous substances which the REQUESTING PARTY found within the PROJECT limits, as a result of performing the investigation and visual inspection required herein. The REQUESTING PARTY also certifies that it has been unable to identify any entity who may be liable for the cost of remediation. As a result, the REQUESTING PARTY has included all estimated costs of remediation of such hazardous substances in its estimated cost of construction of the PROJECT. 10. If, subsequent to execution of this contract, previously unknown hazardous substances are discovered within the PROJECT limits, which require environmental remediation pursuant to either state or federal law, the REQUESTING PARTY, in addition to reporting that fact to the Department of Environmental Quality, shall immediately notify the DEPARTMENT, both orally and in writing of such discovery. The DEPARTMENT shall consult with the REQUESTING PARTY to determine ifit is willing to pay for the cost of remediation and, with the FHWA, to determine the eligibility, for reimbursement, of the remediation costs. The REQUESTING PARTY shall be charged for and shall pay all costs associated with such remediation, including all delay costs of the contractor for the PROJECT, in the event that remediation and delay costs are not deemed eligible by the FHWA. If the REQUESTING PARTY refuses to participate in the cost of remediation, the DEPARTMENT shall terminate the PROJECT. The parties agree that any costs or damages that the DEPARTMENT incurs as a result of such termination shall be considered a PROJECT COST. 11. If federal and/or state funds administered by the DEPARTMENT are used to pay the cost of remediating any hazardous substances discovered after the execution of this contract and if there is a reasonable likelihood of recovery, the REQUESTING PARTY, in cooperation with the Department of Environmental Quality and the DEPARTMENT, shall make a diligent effort to recover such costs from all other possible entities. If recovery is made, the DEPARTMENT shall be reimbursed from such recovery for the proportionate share of the amount paid by the FHWA and/or the DEPARTMENT and the DEPARTMENT shall credit such sums to the appropriate funding source. 09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 4 12. The DEPARTMENT'S sole reason for entering into this contract is to enable the REQUESTING PARTY to obtain and use funds provided by the Federal Highway Administration pursuant to Title 23 of the United States Code. Any and all approvals of, reviews of, and recommendations regarding contracts, agreements, permits, plans, specifications, or documents, of any nature, or any inspections of work by the DEPARTMENT or its agents pursuant to the terms of this contract are done to assist the REQUESTING PARTY in meeting program guidelines in order to qualify for available funds. Such approvals, reviews, inspections and recommendations by the DEPARTMENT or its agents shall not relieve the REQUESTING PARTY and the local agencies, as applicable, of their ultimate control and shall not be construed as a warranty of their propriety or that the DEPARTMENT or its agents is assuming any liability, control or jurisdiction. The providing of recommendations or advice by the DEPARTMENT or its agents does not relieve the REQUESTING PARTY and the local agencies, as applicable of their exclusive jurisdiction of the highway and responsibility under MCL 691.1402, MSA 3.996(102). When providing approvals, reviews and recommendations under this contract, the DEPARTMENT or its agents is performing a governmental function, as that term is defined in MCL 691.1401; MSA 3.996(101), which is incidental to the completion of the PROJECT. 13. The DEPARTMENT, by executing this contract, and rendering services pursuant to this contract, has not and does not assume jurisdiction of the highway, described as the PROJECT for purposes of MCL 691.1402; MSA 3.996(102). Exclusive jurisdiction of such highway for the purposes of MCL 691.1402; MSA 3.996(102) rests with the REQUESTING PARTY and other local agencies having respective jurisdiction. 14. The REQUESTING PARTY shall approve all of the plans and specifications to be used on the PROJECT and shall be deemed to have approved all changes to the plans and specifications when put into effect. It is agreed that ultimate responsibility and control over the PROJECT rests with the REQUESTING PARTY and local agencies, as applicable. 15. The REQUESTING PARTY agrees that the costs reported to the DEPARTMENT for this contract will represent only those items that are properly chargeable in accordance with this contract. The REQUESTING PARTY also certifies that it has read the contract terms and has made itself aware of the applicable laws, regulations, and terms of this contract that apply to the reporting of costs incurred under the terms of this contract. 16. The parties shall promptly provide comprehensive assistance and cooperation in defending and resolving any claims brought against the DEPARTMENT by the contractor, vendors or suppliers as a result of the DEPARTMENT'S award of the construction contract for the PROJECT. Costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT in defending or resolving such claims shall be considered PROJECT COSTS. 09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 5 17. The DEPARTMENT shall require the contractor who is awarded the contract for the construction of the PROJECT to provide insurance in the amounts specified and in accordance with the DEPARTMENT'S current Standard Specifications for Construction and to: A. Maintain bodily injury and property damage insurance for the duration of the PROJECT. B. Provide owner's protective liability insurance naming as insureds the State of Michigan, the Michigan State Transportation Commission, the DEPARTMENT and its officials, agents and employees, the REQUESTING PARTY and any other county, county road commission, or municipality in whose jurisdiction the PROJECT is located, and their employees, for the duration of the PROJECT and to provide, upon request, copies of certificates of insurance to the insureds. It is understood that the DEPARTMENT does not assume jurisdiction of the highway described as the PROJECT as a result of being named as an insured on the owner's protective liability insurance policy. C. Comply with the requirements of notice of cancellation and reduction of insurance set forth in the current standard specifications for construction and to provide, upon request, copies of notices and reports prepared to those insured. 09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 6 18. This contract shall become binding on the parties hereto and of full force and effect upon the signing thereof by the duly authorized officials for the parties hereto and upon the adoption of the necessary resolutions approving said contract and authorizing the signatures thereto of the respective officials of the REQUESTING PARTY, a certified copy of which resolution shall be attached to this contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF MUSKEGON MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP RTATION By J.vv.. Title: Gail A. Kundinger, Ci Clerlc 09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 7 January 16, 2004 EXHIBIT I CONTROL SECTION STUL61407 JOB NUMBER 56377 PROJECT SIP 0461 (308) ESTIMATED COST CONTRACTED WORK PART A PARTB TOTAL Estimated Cost $435,900 $37,100 $473,000 COST PARTICIPATION GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $435,900 $37,100 $473,000 Less Federal Funds* $355,830 $ -0- $355,830 BALANCE (REQUESTING PARTIES SHARE) $ 80,070 $37,100 $117,170 *Federal Funds shall be applied to the eligible items of the PART A portion of the PROJECT COST at a participation ratio equal to 81.85 percent up to an amount not to exceed $355,830. NO DEPOSIT 09/06/90 SIP.FOR 1/20/04 8 •, DOT TYPEB BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS 03-15-93 PART II STANDARD AGREEMENT PROVISIONS SECTION I COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS AND DIRECTIVES. SECTION II PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION . SECTION III ACCOUNTING AND BILLING SECTION IV MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION SECTION V SPECIAL PROGRAM AND PROJECT CONDITIONS I SECTION! COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS AND DIRECTIVES A. To qualify for eligible cost, all work shall be documented in accordance with the require- ments and procedures of the DEPARTMENT. B. All work on projects for which reimbursement with Federal funds is requested shall be performed in accordance with the requirements and guidelines set forth in the following Directives of the Federal-Aid Policy Guide (FAPG) of the FHWA, as applicable, and as referenced in pertinent sections of Title 23 and Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and all supplements and amendments thereto. 1. Engineering a. FAPG (6012.1): Preliminary Engineering b. F APG (23 CFR 172): Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service Contracts c. FAPG (23 CFR 635A): Contract Procedures d. F APG (49 CFR 18.22): Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments-Allowable Costs 2. Construction a. FAPG (23 CFR 140E): Administrative Settlement Costs-Contract Claims b. FAPG (23 CFR 140B): Construction Engineering Costs C. FAPG (23 CFR 17): Recordkeeping and Retention Requirements for Federal- Aid Highway Records of State Highway Agencies d. FAPG (23 CFR 635A): Contract Procedures e. FAPG (23 CFR 635B): Force Account Construction f. F APG (23 CFR 645A): Utility Relocations, Adjustments and Reimbursement g. FAPG (23 CFR 645B): Accommodation of Utilities (PPM 30-4.1) 03-15-93 2 h. FAPG (23 CFR 655F): Traffic Control Devices on Federal-Aid and other Streets and Highways 1. F APG (49 CFR 18.22):Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments-Allowable Costs 3. Modification Or Construction Of Railroad Facilities a. FAPG (23 CFR 1401): Reimbursement for Railroad Work b. F APG (23 CFR 646B): Railroad Highway Projects C. In conformance with FAPG (23 CFR 630C) Project Agreements, the political subdivisions party to this contract, on those Federally funded projects which exceed a total cost of $100,000.00 stipulate the following with respect to their specific jurisdictions: I. That any facility to be utilized in performance under or to benefit from this contract is not listed on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) List of Violating Facilities issued pursuant to the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended. 2. That they each agree to comply with all of the requirements of Section 114 of the Federal Clean Air Act and Section 308 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and all regulations and guidelines issued thereunder. 3. That as a condition of Federal aid pursuant to this contract they shall notify the DEPARTMENT of the receipt of any advice indicating that a facility to be utilized in performance under or to benefit from this contract is under consideration to be listed on the EPA List of Violating Facilities. D. Ensure that the PROJECT is constructed in accordance with and incorporates all committed environmental impact mitigation measures listed in approved environmental documents unless modified or deleted by approval of the FHWA. E. All the requirements, guidelines, conditions and restrictions noted in all other pertinent Directives and Instructional Memoranda of the FHWA will apply to this contract and will be adhered to, as applicable, by the parties hereto. 03-15-93 3 SECTION II PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION A. The DEPARTMENT shall provide such administrative guidance as it determines is required by the PROJECT in order to facilitate the obtaining of available federal and/or state funds. B. The DEP ARTMENTwill advertise and award all contracted portions ofthe PROJECT work. Prior to advertising of the PROJECT for receipt of bids, the REQUESTING PARTY may delete any portion or all of the PROJECT work. After receipt of bids for the PROJECT, the REQUESTING PARTY shall have the right to reject the amount bid for the PROJECT prior to the award of the contract for the PROJECT only if such amount exceeds by twenty percent (20%) the final engineer's estimate therefor. If such rejection of the bids is not received in writing within two (2) weeks after letting, the DEPARTMENT will assume concurrence. The DEPARTMENT may, upon request, readvertise the PROJECT. Should the REQUEST- ING PARTY so request in writing within the aforesaid two (2) week period after letting, the PROJECT will be cancelled and the DEPARTMENT will refund the unused balance of the deposit less all costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT. C. The DEPARTMENT will perform such inspection services on PROJECT work performed by the REQUESTING PARTY with its own forces as is required to ensure compliance with the approved plans & specifications. D. On those projects funded with Federal monies, the DEPARTMENT shall as may be required secure from the FHWA approval of plans and specifications, and such cost estimates for FHWA participation in the PROJECT COST. E. All work in connection with the PROJECT shall be performed in conformance with the Michigan Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction, and the supplemental specifications, Special Provisions and plans pertaining to the PROJECT and all materials furnished and used in the construction of the PROJECT shall conform to the aforesaid specifications. No extra work shall be performed nor changes in plans and specifications made until said work or changes are approved by the project engineer and authorized by the DEPARTMENT. 03-15-93 4 F. Should it be necessary or desirable that portions of the work covered by this contract be accomplished by a consulting firm, a railway company, or governmental ~~ency, firm, person, or corporation, under a subcontract with the REQUESTING PARTY atY'OJECT expense, such subcontracted arrangements will be covered by formal written agi<':c'll.ent between the REQUESTING PARTY and that party. ~ This formal written agreement shall: include a reference to the specific prime contract to which it pertains; include provisions which clearly set forth the maximum reimbursable and the basis of payment; provide for the maintenance of accounting records in accordance wifa generally accepted accounting principles, which clearly document the actual cost of the services provided; provide that costs eligible for reimbursement shall be in accordance with clearly defined cost criteria such as 49 CFR Part 18, 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 140, 0MB Circular A-87, etc. as applicable; provide for access to the department or its representatives to inspect and audit all data and records related to the agreement for a minimum of three years after the department's final payment to the local unit. All such agreements will be submitted for approval by the DEPARTMENT and, if applicable, by the FHWA prior to execution thereof, except for agreements for amounts less than $25,000 for preliminary engineering and testing services executed under and in accor- dance with the provisions of the "Small Purchase Procedures" FAPG (23 CFR 172), which do not require prior approval of the DEPARTMENI' or the FHWA. Any such approval by the DEPARTMENT shall in no way be construed as a warranty of the subcontractor's qualifications, financial integrity, or ability to perform the work being subcontracted. G. The REQUESTING PARTY, at no costto the PROJECT or the DEPARTMENT, shall make such arrangements with railway companies, utilities, etc., as may be necessary for the performance of work required for the PROJECT but for which Federal or other reimbursement will not be requested. H. The REQUESTING PARTY, at no cost to the PROJECT, or the DEPARTMENT, shall secure, as necessary, all agreements and approvals of the PROJECT with railway companies, the Railroad Safety & Tariffs Division of the DEPARTMENT and other concerned governmental agencies other than the FHWA, and will forward same to the DEPARTMENT for such reviews and approvals as may be required. I. No PROJECT work for which reimbursement will be requested by the REQUESTING PARTY is to be subcontracted or performed until the DEPARTMENT gives written notification that such work may commence. 03-15-93 5 J. The REQUESTING PARTY shall be responsible for the payment of all costs and expenses incurred in the performance of the work it agrees to undertake and perform. K. The REQUESTING PARTY shall pay directly to the party performing the work all billings for the services performed on the PROJECT which are authorized by or through the REQUESTING PARTY. L. The REQUESTING PARTY shall submit to the DEPARTMENT all paid billings for which reimbursement is desired in accordance with DEPARTMENT procedures. M. All work by a consulting firm will be performed in compliance with the applicable provisions of 1980 PA 299, Subsection 2001, MCL 339.2001; MSA 18.425(2001), as well as in accordance with the provisions of all previously cited Directives of the FHW A. N. The project engineer shall be subject to such administrative guidance as may be deemed necessary to ensure compliance with program requirement and, in those instances where a consultant firm is retained to provide engineering and inspection services, the personnel performing those services shall be subject to the same conditions. 0. The DEPARTMENT, in administering the PROJECT in accordance with applicable Federal and State requirements and regulations, neither assumes nor becomes liable for any obliga- tions undertaken or arising between the REQUESTING PARTY and any other party with respect to the PROJECT. P. In the event it is determined by the DEPARTMENT that there will be either insufficient Federal funds or insufficient time to properly administer such funds for the entire PROJECT or portions thereof, the DEPARTMENT, prior to advertising or issuing authorization for work performance, may cancel the PROJECT, or any portion thereof, and upon written notice to the parties this contract shall be void and of no effect with respect to that cancelled portion of the PROJECT. Any PROJECT deposits previously made by the parties on the cancelled portions of the PROJECT will be promptly refunded. Q. Those projects funded with Federal monies will be subject to inspection at all times by the DEPARTMENT and the FHWA. 03-15-93 6 SECTION III ACCOUNTING AND BILLING A. Procedures for billing for work undertaken by the REQUESTING PARTY: I. The REQUESTING PARTY shall establish and maintain accurate records, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, of all expenses incurred for which payment is sought or made under this contract, said records to be hereinafter referred to as the "RECORDS". Separate accounts shall be established and maintained for all costs incurred under this contract. The REQUESTING PARTY shall maintain the RECORDS for at least three (3) years from the date of final payment of Federal Aid made by the DEPARTMENT under this contract. In the event of a dispute with regard to the allowable expenses or any other issue under this contract, the REQUESTING PARTY shall thereafter continue to maintain the RECORDS at least until that dispute has been finally decided and the time for all available challenges or appeals of that decision has expired. The DEPARTMENT, or its representative, may inspect, copy, or audit the RECORDS at any reasonable time after giving reasonable notice. If any part of the work is subcontracted, the REQUESTING PARTY shall assure compliance with the above for all subcontracted work. In the event that an audit performed by or on behalf of the DEPARTMENT indicates an adjustment to the costs reported under this contract, or questions the allowability of an item of expense, the DEPARTMENT shall promptly submit to the REQUESTING PARTY, a Notice of Audit Results and a copy of the audit report which may supplement or modify any tentative findings verbally communicated to the REQUESTING PARTY at the completion ofan audit. Within sixty (60) days after the date of the Notice of Audit Results, the REQUESTING PARTY shall: (a) respond in writing to the responsible Bureau or the DEPARTMENT indicating whether or not it concurs with the audit report, (b) clearly explain the nature and basis for any disagreement as to a disallowed item of expense and, (c) submit to the DEPARTMENT a written explanation as to any questioned or no opinion expressed item of expense, hereinafter referred to as the "RESPONSE". The RESPONSE shall be clearly stated and provide any supporting documentation necessary to resolve any disagreement or questioned or no opinion expressed item of expense. Where the documentation is voluminous, the REQUESTING PARTY may supply appropriate excerpts and make alternate arrangements to conveniently and 03-15-93 7 reasonably make that documentation available for review by the DEPARTMENT. The RESPONSE shall refer to and apply the language of the contract. The REQUESTING PARTY agrees that failure to submit a RESPONSE within the sixty (60) day period constitutes agreement with any disallowance of an item of expense and authorizes the DEPARTMENT to finally disallow any items of questioned or no opinion expressed cost. The DEPARTMENT shall make its decision with regard to any Notice of Audit Results and RESPONSE within one hundred twenty (120) days after the date of the Notice of Audit Results. Ifthe DEPARTMENT determines that an overpayment has been made to the REQUESTING PARTY, the REQUESTING PARTY shall repay that amount to the DEPARTMENT or reach agreement with the DEPARTMENT on a repayment schedule within thirty (30) days after the date of an invoice from the DEPARTMENT. If the REQUESTING PARTY fails to repay the overpayment or reach agreement with the DEPARTMENT on a repayment schedule within the thirty (30) day period, the REQUESTING PARTY agrees that the DEPARTMENT shall deduct all or a portion of the overpayment from any funds then or thereafter payable by the DEPARTMENT to the REQUESTING PARTY under this contract or any other agreement, or payable to the REQUESTING PARTY under the terms of 1951 PA 51, as applicable. Interest will be assessed on any partial payments or repayment schedules based on the unpaid balance at the end of each month until the balance is paid in full. The assessment of interest will begin thirty (30) days from the date of the invoice. The rate of interest will be based on the Michigan Department of Treasury common cash funds interest earnings. The rate of interest will be reviewed annually by the DEPARTMENT and adjusted as necessary based on the Michigan Department of Treasury common cash funds interest earnings. The REQUESTING PARTY expressly consents to this withholding or offsetting of funds under those circumstances, reserving the right to file a lawsuit in the Court of Claims to contest the DEPARTMENT'S decision only as to any item of expense the disallowance of which was disputed by the REQUESTING PARTY in a timely filed RESPONSE. The REQUESTING PARTY shall comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502. The REQUESTING PARTY shall adhere to the following requirements associated with audits of accounts and records: a. Agencies expending a total of $300,000 or more in federal funds, from one or more funding sources in its fiscal year, shall comply with the requirements of the federal Office of Management and Budget (0MB) Circular A-133, as revised or amended. 03-15-93 8 The agency shall submit two copies of: The Reporting Package The Data Collection Form The management letter to the agency, if one issued by the audit firm The 0MB Circular A-133 audit must be submitted to the address below in accordance with the time frame established in the circular, as revised or amended. b. Agencies expending less than $300,000 in federal funds must submit a letter to the Department advising that a circular audit was not required. The letter shall indicate the applicable fiscal year, the amount of federal funds spent, the name(s) of the Department federal programs, and the CFDA grant number(s). This information must also be submitted to the address below. c. Address: Michigan Department of Transportation Bureau of Highways Technical Services 425 W. Ottawa, P.O. Box 30050 Lansing, MI 48909 d. Agencies must also comply with applicable State laws and regulations relative to audit requirements. e. Agencies shall not charge audit costs to Department's federal programs which are not in accordance with the 0MB Circular A-133 requirements. f. All agencies are subject to the federally required monitoring activities, which may include limited scope reviews and other on-site monitoring. 2. Agreed Unit Prices Work - All billings for work undertaken by the REQUESTING PARTY on an agreed unit price basis will be submitted in accordance with the Michigan Department ofTransportation Standard Specifications for Construction and pertinent FAPO Directives and Guidelines of the FHW A. 3. Force Account Work and Subcontracted Work - All billings submitted to the DEPARTMENT for Federal reimbursement for items of work performed on a force account basis or by any subcontract with a consulting firm, railway company, governmental agency or other party, under the terms of this contract, shall be prepared in accordance with the provisions of the pertinent FHPM Directives and the procedures of the DEPARTMENT. Progress billings may be submitted monthly during the time work is being performed provided, however, that no bill of a lesser amount than $1,000.00 shall be submitted unless it is a final or end of fiscal year billing. All billings shall be labeled either "Progress Bill Number _ _ _ ", or "Final Billing". 03-15-93 9 4. Final billing under this contract shall be submitted in a timely manner but not later than six months after completion of the work. Billings for work submitted later than six months after completion of the work will not be paid. 5. Upon receipt of billings for reimbursement for work undertaken by the REQUESTING PARTY on projects funded with Federal monies, the DEPARTMENT will act as billing agent for the REQUESTING PARTY, consolidating said billings with those for its own force account work and presenting these consolidated billings to the FHWA for payment. Upon receipt of reimbursement from the FHWA, the DEPARTMENT will promptly forward to the REQUESTING PARTY its share of said reimbursement. 6. Upon receipt of billings for reimbursement for work undertaken by the REQUESTING PARTY on projects funded with non-Federal monies, the DEPARTMENT will promptly forward to the REQUESTING PARTY reimbursement of eligible costs. B. Payment of Contracted and DEPARTMENT Costs: 1. As work on the PROJECT commences, the initial payments for contracted work and/or costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT will be made from the working capital deposit. Receipt of progress payments of Federal funds, and where applicable, State Critical Bridge funds, will be used to replenish the working capital deposit. The REQUESTING PARTY shall make prompt payments of its share of the contracted and/or DEPARTMENT incurred portion of the PROJECT COST upon receipt of progress billings from the DEPARTMENT. Progress billings will be based upon the REQUESTING PARTY'S share of the actual costs incurred as work on the PROJECT progresses and will be submitted, as required, until it is determined by the DEPARTMENT that there is sufficient available working capital to meet the remaining anticipated PROJECT COSTS. All progress payments will be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of billings. No monthly billing of a lesser amount than $1,000.00 will be made unless it is a final or end of fiscal year billing. Should the DEPARTMENT determine that the available working capital exceeds the remaining anticipated PROJECT COSTS, the DEPARTMENT may reimburse the REQUESTING PARTY such excess. Upon completion of the PROJECT, payment of all PROJECT COSTS, receipt of all applicable monies from the FHWA, and completion of necessary audits, the REQUESTING PARTY will be reimbursed the balance of its deposit. 03-15-93 IO 2. In the event that the bid, plus contingencies, for the, contracted, and/or the DEPARTMENT incurred portion of the PROJECT work exceeds the estimated cost therefor as established by this contract, the REQUESTING PARTY may be advised and billed for the additional amount of its share. C. General Conditions: 1. The DEPARTMENT, in accordance with its procedures in existence and covering the time period involved, shall make payment for interest earned on the balance of working capital deposits for all projects on account with the DEPARTMENT The REQUESTING PARTY in accordance with DEPARTMENT procedures in existence and covering the time period involved, shall make payment for interest owed on any deficit balance of working capital deposits for all projects on account with the DEPARTMENT This payment or billing is processed on an annual basis corresponding to the State of Michigan fiscal year. Upon receipt of billing for interest incurred, the REQUESTING PARTY promises and shall promptly pay the DEPARTMENT said amount. 2. Pursuant to the authority granted by law, the REQUESTING PARTY hereby irrevocably pledges a sufficient amount of funds received by it from the Michigan Transportation Fund to meet its obligations as specified in PART I and PART IL If the REQUESTING PARTY shall fail to make any of its required payments when due, as specified herein, the DEPARTMENT shall immediately notify the REQUESTING PARTY and the State Treasurer of the State of Michigan or such other state officer or agency having charge and control over disbursement of the Michigan Transportation Fund, pursuant to law, of the fact of such default and the amount thereof, and, if such default is not cured by payment within ten (I 0) days, said State Treasurer or other state officer or agency is then authorized and directed to withhold from the first of such monies thereafter allocated by law to the REQUESTING PARTY from the Michigan Transportation Fund sufficient monies to remove the default, and to credit the REQUESTING PARTY with payment thereof, and to notify the REQUESTING PARTY in writing of such fact. 3. Upon completion of all work under this contract and final audit by the DEPARTMENT or the FHWA, the REQUESTING PARTY promises to promptly repay the DEPARTMENT for any disallowed items of costs previously disbursed by the DEPARTMENT. The REQUESTING PARTY pledges its future receipts from the Michigan Transportation Fund for repayment of all disallowed items and, upon failure to make repayment for any disallowed items within ninety (90) days of demand made by the DEPARTMENT, the DEPARTMENT is hereby authorized to withhold an equal amount from the REQUESTING PARTY'S share of any future distribution of Michigan Transportation Funds in settlement of said claim. 03-15-93 11 4. The DEPARTMENT shall maintain and keep accurate records and accounts relative to the cost of the PROJECT and upon completion of the PROJECT, payment of all items of PROJECT COST, receipt of all Federal Aid, if any, and completion of final audit by the DEPARTMENT and if applicable, by the FHWA, shall make final accounting to the REQUESTING PARTY. The final PROJECT accounting will not include interest earned or charged on working capital deposited for the PROJECT which will be accounted for separately at the close of the State of Michigan fiscal year and as set forth in Section C( 1). 5. The costs of engineering and other services performed on those projects involving specific program funds and one hundred percent (I 00%) local funds will be appor- tioned to the respective portions of that project in the same ratio as the actual direct construction costs unless otherwise specified in PART I. 03-15-93 12 SECTION IV MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION A. Upon completion of construction of each part of the PROJECT, at no cost to the DEPARTMENT or the PROJECT, each of the parties hereto, within their respective jurisdictions, will make the following provisions for the maintenance and operation of the completed PROJECT: I. All Projects: Properly maintain and operate each part of the project, making ample provisions each year for the performance of such maintenance work as may be required, except as qualified in paragraph 2b of this section. 2. Projects Financed in Part with Federal Monies: a. Sign and mark each part of the PROJECT, in accordance with the current Michigan Manual of Uniform Traffic control Devices, and will not install, or permit to be installed, any signs, signals or markings not in conformance with the standards approved by the FHWA, pursuant to 23 USC I 09(d). b. Remove, prior to completion of the PROJECT, all encroachments from the roadway right-of-way within the limits of each part of the PROJECT. With respect to new or existing utility installations within the right-of-way of Federal Aid projects and pursuant to FAPG (23 CFR 645B): Occupancy of non-limited access right-of-way may be allowed based on consideration for traffic safety and necessary preservation of roadside space and aesthetic quality. Longitudinal occupancy of non-limited access right-of-way by private lines will require a finding of significant economic hardship, the unavailability of practicable alternatives or other extenuating circumstances. c. Cause to be enacted, maintained and enforced, ordinances and regulations for proper traffic operations in accordance with the plans of the PROJECT. d. Make no changes to ordinances or regulations enacted, or traffic controls installed in conjunction with the PROJECT work without prior review by the DEPARTMENT and approval of the FHWA, if required. 03-15-93 13 B. On projects for the removal of roadside obstacles, the parties, upon completion of construction of each part of the PROJECT, at no cost to the PROJECT or the DEPARTMENT, will, within their respective jurisdictions, take such action as is necessary to assure that the roadway right-of-way, cleared as the PROJECT, will be maintained free of such obstacles. C. On projects for the construction of bikeways, the parties will enact no ordinances or regulations prohibiting the use of bicycles on the facility hereinbefore described as the PROJECT, and will amend any existing restrictive ordinances in this regard so as to allow use of this facility by bicycles. No motorized vehicles shall be permitted on such bikeways or walkways constructed as the PROJECT except those for maintenance purposes. D. Failure of the parties hereto to fulfill their respective responsibilities as outlined herein may disqualify that party from future Federal-aid participation in projects on roads or streets for which it has maintenance responsibility. Federal Aid may be withheld until such time as deficiencies in regulations have been corrected, and the improvements constructed as the PROJECT are brought to a satisfactory condition of maintenance. 03-15-93 14 SECTIONV SPECIAL PROGRAM AND PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Those projects for which the REQUESTING PARTY has been reimbursed with Federal monies for the acquisition of right-of-way must be under construction by the close of the twentieth (20th) fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the FHW A and the DEPARTMENT projects agreement covering that work is executed, or the REQUESTING PARTY maybe required to repay to the DEPARTMENT, for forwarding to the FHWA, all monies distributed as the FHWA'S contribution to that right-of-way. B. Those projects for which the REQUESTING PARTY has been reimbursed with Federal monies for the performance of preliminary engineering must be under construction by the close of the tenth (I 0th) fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the FHWA and the DEPARTMENT projects agreement covering that work is executed, or the REQUESTING PARTY may be required to repay to the DEPARTMENT, for forwarding to the FHWA, all monies distributed as the FHWA'S contribution to that preliminary engineering. C. On those projects funded with Federal monies, the REQUESTING PARTY, at no cost to the PROJECT or the DEPARTMENT, will provide such accident information as is available and such other information as may be required under the program in order to make the proper assessment of the safety benefits derived from the work performed as the PROJECT. The REQUESTING PARTY will cooperate with the DEPARTMENT in the development of reports and such analysis as may be required and will, when requested by the DEPARTMENT, forward to the DEPARTMENT, in such form as is necessary, the required information. D. In connection with the performance of PROJECT work under this contract the parties hereto (hereinafter in Appendix "A" referred to as the "contractor") agree to comply with the State of Michigan provisions for "Prohibition of Discrimination in State Contracts", as set forth in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The parties further covenant that they will comply with the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, being P.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, as amended, being Title 42 U.S.C. Sections 1971, 1975a-1975d, and 2000a-2000h-6 and the Regulations of the United States Department of Transportation (49 C.F.R. Part 21) issued pursuant to said Act, including Appendix "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, and will require similar covenants on the part of any contractor or subcontractor employed in the performance of this contract. E. The parties will carry out the applicable requirements of the DEPARTMENT'S Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program and 49 CFR, Part 26, including, but not limited to, those requirements set forth in Appendix C. 03-15-93 15 APPENDIX A PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION IN STATE CONTRACTS In connection with the performance of work under this contract; the contractor agrees as follows: I. In accordance with Act No. 453, Public Acts of 1976, the contractor hereby agrees not to discriminate against an employee or applicant for employment with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or as a matter directly or indirectly related to employment, because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, or marital status. Further, in accordance with Act No. 220, Public Acts of 1976 as amended by Act No. 478, Public Acts of 1980 the contractor hereby agrees not to discriminate against an employee or applicant for employment with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment, because of a disability that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a particular job or position. A breach of the above covenants shall be regarded as a material breach of this contract. 2. The contractor hereby agrees that any and all subcontracts to this contract, whereby a portion of the work set forth in this contract is to be performed, shall contain a covenant the same as hereinabove set forth in Section I of this Appendix. 3. The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants for employment and employees are treated without regard to their race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, marital status or a disability that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a particular job or position. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 4. The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, marital status or disability that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a particular job or position. 5. The contractor or his collective bargaining repre'sentative will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice advising the said labor union or workers' representative of the contractor's commitments under this appendix. 6. The contractor will comply with all relevant published rules, regulations, directives, and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual state project. 7. The contractor will furnish and file compliance reports within such time and upon such forms as provided by the Michigan Civil Rights Commission, said forms may also elicit information as to the practices, policies, program, and employment statistics of each subcontractor as well as the contractor himself, and said contractor will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the Michigan Civil Rights Commission and/or its agent, for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with this contract and relevant with rules, regulations, and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission. 8. In the event that the Civil Rights Commission finds, after a hearing held pursuant to its rules, that a contractor has not complied with the contractual obligations under this agreement, the Civil Rights Commission may, as part of its order based upon such findings, certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan, which Administrative Board may order the cancellation of the contract found to have been violated and/or declare the contractor ineligible for future contracts with the state and its political and civil subdivisions, departments, and officers, and including the governing boards of institutions of higher education, until the contractor complies with said order of the Civil Rights Commission. Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the contractor is declared ineligible to contract as a contracting party in future contracts. In any case before the Civil Rights Commission in which cancellation of an existing contract is a possibility, the contracting agency shall be notified of such possible remedy and shall be given the option by the Civil Rights Commission to participate in such proceedings. 9. The contractor will include, or incorporate by reference, the provisions of the foregoing paragraphs (I) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by the rules, regulations or orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission, and will provide in every subcontract or purchase order that said provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or seller. March, 1998 (Rev. 03/92) APPENDIXB During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor shall comply with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 27, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. 2. Nondiscrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or natural origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations. 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin. 4. Information and Reports: The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Michigan Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations or directives. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the Michigan Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the Michigan Department of Transportation shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: (a) Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or (b) Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. 6. Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs I through 6 of every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the Michigan Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non- compliance; provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the Michigan Department of Transportation to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the State, and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. APPENDIXC TO BE INCLUDED IN ALL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL AGENCIES Assurance that Recipients and Contractors Must Make (Excerpts from US DOT Regulation 49 CFR 26.13) A. Each financial assistance agreement signed with a DOT operating administration (or a primary recipient) must include the following assurance: The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any US DOT-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of US DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by US DOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. lmplementatio1f of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved program, the department may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.). B. Each contract MDOT signs with a contractor (and each subcontract the prime contractor signs with a subcontractor) must include the following assurance: The contractor, sub recipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of US DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate. Commission Meeting Date: February 10, 2004 Date: February 3, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Planning & Economic Development cJII-- RE: Mall Study Committee Final Report SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Study Committee, which was appointed by the City Commission on April 22, 2003 to study the historic significance of the mall structures, has developed a final report. The five buildings researched are commonly known as the Russell Block (Daniels), Century Club, Muskegon Savings Bank, Montgomery Block (National City Bank), and the Hackley Bank Building (Comerica). To finalize its duties, the Study Committee is forwarding on the final report with a recommendation to the City Commission. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To accept the Study Committee report and recommendation. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Study Committee recommended to the City Commission that the compromise of placing the demolition permits for the four buildings in question be placed in escrow so they cannot be demolished until we have final site plans and the closing on the property. 2/3/2004 Mall Study Committee Final Repmt By state statute and local ordinance, histmic preservation has been declared a "public good" because histmic preservation safeguards local history, stabilizes and improves property values, fosters civic beauty, and strengthens the local economy. In compliance with state statute, the Western A venue Scattered Site Histmic District Study Committee has been charged by the Muskegon City Commission to consider the merit of designating five buildings in the former Muskegon Mall historic. (Approved Aptil 22,2003 City Commission meeting) This committee of five used information complied by the archivist of the Muskegon County Museum and our collective knowledge of the area in question to complete the task. The committee members are: Daniel Chambers- Chair, Muskegon Historic District Commission Lawrence Spataro- Muskegon City Commissioner, Histmic District Commissioner Jon Colburn- Pa5t HDC Commissioner, Historic Preservationist Mary O'Connor- Vice President of Finance, Community Foundation for Muskegon County, prope1ty owner Mark Brant- Chatter Development/ Arco Construction The study committee researched 5 buildings commonly known as the Russell Block (Daniels), Century Club, Muskegon Savings Bank, Montgome1y Block (National City Bank), and the Hackley Bank Building (Come1ica). The study committee created a preliminmy repmt and forwarded the repmt onto the State on September 12, 2003. The repott was also fo1warded onto the Planning Commission for their input. The Planning Commission made a motion to refer this issue back to the City Commission without a recommendation. On November 25, 2003 the City Commission approved a 60 day emergency demolition moratotium on the five mall buildings. The moratmium was lifted from the Hackley Bank Building (Comerica) in December. The Study Committee held the public hearing regarding the mall structures on Januat·y 21, 2004. Chatter Development group presented renderings of the proposed development on the mall site. As in past discussions, there were opinions put fotth for both saving the structures and against saving the structures. The DMDC offered to save the facades of the Century Club and Muskegon Savings Bank to be used in the development. The Study Committee recommended to the City Commission that the compromise of placing the demolition permits for the four buildings in question be placed in escrow so they cannot be demolished until we have final site plans and the closing on the prope1ty. 2/3/04 2 Februmy 1, 2004 1399 Nelson Muskegon, MI 49441 Mayor Steve Warmington, Vice Mayor Larson and Commissioners Carter, Davis, Gawron, Shepard and Spataro City of Muskegon 933 Terrace Street Muskegon, Ml Re: Muskegon Mall Redevelopment Plans Dear Mayor Warmington, Vice Mayor Larson and City Commissioners, The City Commission is faced with, what in my opinion are, some of the most important decisions to be made in detennining the City's nmnediate and long-range future for our "Center City". You, as Mayor and City Commissioners, have already established your credibility with Muskegon Citizens having made difficult but courageous decisions concerning the Smmt Pm-k, Renaissance Zones, and Muskegon-Milwaukee Fast Feny to name a few. I feel it necessmy to weigh-in on this subject for many reasons not the least of which is that some proposals that have been made m·e just plain short-sighted. In stating this opinion, I realize that many, including the Muskegon �hronicle, would have you believe that you must make quick decisions based upon what has b&n put before you versus taking a more visionmy role and working toward that end by forging private-public partnerships with those who share that vision. I do not believe you should subscribe to "the bird in the hand... " view no matter the source. You were elected to fenet out what is in the City's best interest, and it is your solemn duty and privilege to vote your conscience no matter the opposition. You have demonstrated your willingness to proceed cautiously and wisely and need to do so now. What I find especially disturbing, in much of the discussion and community forwns over the past couple of years, is what seems a willingness to sell Muskegon shmt and piecemeal our "Center City" planning. In my opinion, not one of the "Downtown Plans" has conveyed a vision bold enough to attract sufficient private investment in a timely fashion. Not one has recognized that a market must exist or be created that attracts private investors willing to risk the economic swings of Muskegon and the Nation. Not one provides the connectors between development "nodes". All are disjointed pieces of a "Center City Plan". Let me provide examples and comparisons why I view these effo1ts as sho1tsighted and less bold thmt the City deserves. The recent unveiling of a schematic design for the Muskegon Mall site reveals a paltty $40 million dollar nwestment for this 30+ acre site and fmther suggests there is a need for public commitment for stt·eets and infrastructure. This projected investment pales in comparison with other investments in Muskegon. Walker and Frauenthal renovations - Millions of Dollars; Holiday Inn $18 Million; Amazon Building $16 Million; Shoreline Inn and Suites $12 Million; Balcom's Cove $16 Million; GVSU Water Resources Center - Millions and Smmt Zone projected at Tens of Millions. These developments exhibit as much as $10+ Million/Acre investment. Yet, we are lead to believe that the $40 Million orless than $1.3 Million/Acre on this prime site is something we should welcome. This site should command a private investment of $100 � $200 Million or more if properly planned and integrated with other "Center City" developments. A market can be developed to attract this level of private investment with the proper vision. Many high-end developers are just waiting for the engine to be given the go ahead before they step forward and announce plans. TI1e Lakes Mall and environs is an example of the frenzy that will occur with an engine to generate new investors. Without an equivalent vision Muskegon will be relegated to accepting disjointed, piecemeal development woefully inadequate for "Center City Muskegon". I ask you, will an "Urban Village" of $40 million on 30+ acres attract the Milwaukee-Muskegon Fast Feny passenger to Downtown Muskegon?" I think not! Will the "Urban Village" as c1mently proposed provide Jobs, Growtl1 and Opportunity for Muskegon Citizens? I think not! Will the "Urban Village" expand the ente1taimnent venues and lakefront development existing and so desperately needed? I think not! Will the "Urban Village" turn "Center City Muskegon" into a 24/7 destination for residents and tourists? I think not! Will this proposal decrease the rumual subsides to the Frauenthal Theater and the $250,000+ annual deficit of the Walker Arena? I think not! Most impmtantly, will the "Urban Village" as proposed spur other developers to want to vie for other locations in "Center City" to be next to "what's happening" mid increase prope1ty values to levels they need to be for Muskegon? I think not! If the "Urban Village" is to be prut of our "Cool City" it must be built to a size, scale and density consistent with a bold vision for Muskegon's future. Your approval of this plan must not be deal only with the mechanics of plan approval but with the substance and essence of the proposal and its fit with a broader-bolder vision for "Center City Muskegon". You, as Mayor and Commissions, have endorsed by resolution the Citizen's passage of the Casino Gaming Referendum for "Center City Muskegon" proposed by the Archimedes Group and endorsed by YESMUSKEGON. I would submit to you, this broader-bolder vision contains the engine necessruy to drive other developers to pay deru1y for development 1ights for any available land and build at a density consistent with this broader vision. It is tl1is vision that when implemented will create the market for Chruter Group or otl1er developers to step up and invest $100-$200 Million or more into the mall site. By this, I am not, I repeat am not, suggesting that Archimedes or another developer replace Chmter Group to develop the mall site. I am suggesting that you not approve the schematics presented as a plan for this site. You must demand more, MUCH MORE! Once you obtain MUCH MORE, you must provide the safeguards in the PUD approvals and development agreements to insure that it is built to the quality and specification Muskegon deserves. There are those who ru·e skeptical and say a casino isn't possible. Others say it isn't needed. Others say it isn't wanted. Others, including the Muskegon Chronicle, say build it somewhere else in the county and we won't be opposed. To them I say. Look at Manistee, Mount Pleasant, Petoskey, Sault Sainte Mruie, Mru·quette and Detroit etc for exrunples of yes it can be done here. To them I say. Nothing else will generate the vast amount of private investment needed in a relatively shmt time. To them I say. If you put it elsewhere in Muskegon County it doesn't do anything for "Center City Muskegon". To them I say. It can be of the highest quality we desire it to be. To them 1 say. Get on board with YESMUSKEGON and help make it happen here. To them I say. Jobs, Growth and Oppmtunity m·e knocking on our door and shouldn't be shut out. I conclude with where I began, Mayor Wannington. You and the City Commission have displayed great vision, leadership and dedication which has not gone urrnoticed. You must expect and demand MUCH MORE of the Chatter Group proposal that, what has been put fotih to date. You must demand that it be fully integrated with and support already existing facilities and our lakefront development. You must demand that this proposal fit iu a larger "Center City Vision". Although some might view this as a lost opp01tunity, should present plans for the mall site not go f01ward for whatever reason, I would suggest it is not. Past city commissions have been cajoled, arm-twisted and threatened to get plans approved. They finally relented and found that the plans were less than expected or desired and didn't provide proper safeguards. On the other hand a previous City Commission demanded MUCH MORE with the Harbour Towne Condominium development as you have with the Smmt Zone and look what fine jewels these developments m·e turning out to be. Communities are constantly rebuilding themselves and through change weaving uew fabric along with historic fabric to build new communities. Your decisions for our "Center City" are an integral part of weaving our future. Do not let others sell the City of Muskegon sh01t. Similar arguments are being espoused by the Muskegon Chronicle and others for "huny up" and "stand aside" decisions for other proposals they seem to embrace such as the Muskegon Boiler Works. By way of explanation, "Center City" was specifically chosen to reflect that development opp01tunities abound from Coles Quality Foods to the Consumers Power Plant and Muskegon Lake's Shoreline to Southern Avenue. This "Center City" requires a broader and bolder vision than being proposed for the Muskegon Mall site. Thank you for the opp01tunity to express my opinion. Thm1k you and city staff more for your concern and dedic~tion to Muskegon. , Sincerely,,; ~- - -"~7- ----:::::;----:::=:r:., -~~: ✓E:----t/:L'...__--..... / ·' •>-<f/ G ~ , 7,:P ~,,-,.c::: ~ ~ ,C ' •JtavicfL Wen t1 , Citizen of Mus~gon CC: Bryon Mazade, City Manager AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ __ CITY COMMISSION MEETING 2/10/04 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners FROM: Bryon L. Mazade, City Manager DATE: February 3, 2004 RE: Agreement with the DMDC SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve an agreement with the DMDC regarding the demolition of the buildings associated with the former Muskegon Mall. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the attached agreement. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None. O:COMMON\DEPTMENT\ADMIN\AGNDAFRM JMS - O: (DMDC-AGMT) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT 2004-20(c) This Agreement made this 10th day of February, 2004, by and between THE CITY OF MUSKEGON, a Michigan municipal corporation (the "City") of933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan 49440 and DOWNTOWN MUSKEGON DEVELOPMENT CO., a Michigan non- profit corporation (the "DMDC") of 425 West Western Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49440, with reference to the following facts: A. DMDC is the owner of certain real estate located in the City of Muskegon bordered by Terrace Street on the north, Third Street on the south, Clay Street on the east and Morris Street on the west, which was formerly known as the Muskegon Mall (the "Property"). B. DMDC is engaged in the redevelopment of the Property and is in the process of demolishing portions of the old Mall premises to prepare the Property for redevelopment. C. DMDC is in the process of seeking a developer for the Property. D. DMDC has requested issuance of a demolition permit to allow for demolition of four buildings located within or adjacent to the former Mall premises (the Century Club (excluding the fa9ade), the Daniels Building, the Muskegon Savings Bank Building (except the front and side fa9ade), and the National Cities Bank Building). E. The City has indicated its desire to consider the four buildings as historic structures and, as such, has issued a moratorium on demolition permits pursuant to MCL 399.214(4) while that issue is considered. F. The City and DMDC have now reached an agreement that DMDC may proceed with demolition of the remaining buildings in question, (excluding the facade of the Century Club and the front and side fa9ade of the Muskegon Savings Bank), subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. The parties, therefore, agree as follows: I. The City agrees as follows: (a) City will allow the present moratorium to expire and will not adopt a new moratorium as to the Property so long as DMDC and any successor or party in interest with DMDC comply with this Agreement; (b) The City declines to, and will not, establish a historic district including the Century Club, Daniels Building, Muskegon Savings Bank Building and the National Cities Bank Building, or any one of them, G:IEDS I\FILES\00100\ 1884\AG\B E0 14 7. DOC I (c) The City has prepared a demolition permit for the Century Club (excluding the front fa9ade), the Daniels Building, the Muskegon Savings Bank Building (excluding the front and side facades), and the National Cities Bank Building. (d) City shall issue a demolition permit forthwith for the Century Club (excluding the front fa9ade), the Daniels Building, the Muskegon Savings Bank Building (excluding the front and side fa9ade), and the National Cities Bank Building upon completion of the following: (i) approval by all requisite public bodies of a site plan for the proposed development on the Property which shows that the front far;:ade of the Century Club and the front and side facades of the Muskegon Savings Bank have been retained in their present locations; and (ii) submission by DMDC and/or Charter of drawings from a structural engineer evidencing support of the facades during and after demolition of the buildings. 2. DMDC and Charter agree as follows: (a) DMDC and/or Charter (1) shall not apply for a demolition permit, and pay the required fee of $781.00, tmtil DMDC and/or Charter has filed a site plan and has received all legally required approvals of the site plan, and (2) has closed on the sale of the property to the developer who submitted the approved site plan. (b) DMDC and/or Charter agree to provide evidence satisfactory to the City Manager, which may be provided as a confidential document pursuant to MCL Section 15.243(l)(f), ofits financial ability to construct the buildings described in the site plan. (c) DMDC and/or Charter agree the site plan shall use the front fa9ade of the Century Club and the front and side fa9ade (east and south walls) of the Muskegon Savings Bank in their present location. 3. Throughout this agreement, reference to DMDC includes not only itself but also any other entity having an interest in the Property through an acquisition of an interest from DMDC, working in cooperation with DMDC, or as an agent of DMDC. 4. Duplicate counterparts of this Memorandum of Agreement have been executed by the parties on the day and year above first written. G:\EDSI\FlLES\00100\1884\AG\B E0147 .DOC 2 / DOWNTOWN MUSKEGON DEVELOPMENT CO. By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Chris A. McGuigan, Its President Charter Development hereby agrees to the terms of paragraph 2 to the extent it is the entity that submits a site plan and becomes the developer or owner of the Property: By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Douglas Bock, Charter Development G:\EDS I\FI LES\00100\ 1884\AG\B E0147.DOC 3 CITY OF MUSKEGON DOWNTOWN MUSKEGON DEVELOPMENT CO. By: - - - - - - - - - - - - - Stephen J. Warmington, Mayor By: -- --------- Chris A. McGuigan, Its President By:------------- Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk Charter Development hereby agrees to the terms of paragraph 2 to the extent it is the entity that submits a site plan and becomes the developer or owner of the Property: By:-------------- Douglas Bock, Charter Development G:IEDSI\FILES\001 00\1884\AGIB E014 7 .DOC 3 Date: February 10, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Finance Director RE: Final Amendments to 2003 Budget SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Adoption of the attached year-end amendments to the City's 2003 Budget to assure compliance with the State Uniform Budget Act. This act requires that budgets for "governmental-type" funds (i.e. general fund and special revenue funds) be amended so that expenditures are not reported in the City's audit as exceeding legal appropriations. We are awaiting 4 th quarter income tax accrual figures, so the actual budget amendments will be distributed at the February 9th City Commission work session. FINANCIAL IMPACT: These budget amendments establish the final 2003 authorized revenue estimates and spending limits for the various City departments and funds. The attached schedule shows how the amended budget varies from the original budget (and subsequent budget reforecasts) previously approved by the City Commission. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: Self-explanatory. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The budget will be discussed in detail at the February 9 th work session. 9/18/97 City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Revenue Summary By Source Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Fina! Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Revised Available Fund Balance - BOY $ 2,951,734 $ 3,162,367 $ 2,744,079 $ 2,807,996 $ 2,807,996 $ 2,795,009 $ 50,930 ~)iv(!< 1o/ ,tJ' ., ,., I-). '!: % Taxes City income tax Property taxes - general Property taxes - sanitation $ ~$ ' ' 1,670,955 6,692,609 4,221,258 1,788,871 $ 6,650,000 4,281,332 1,833,822 $ 6,450,000 4,281,332 1,833,822 $EY 1,805,752 68,453 $ (27,928) (28,070) 6,518,400 4,253,400 1,805,700 $ (131,600) (27,932) (28,122) 1.06% -0.65% -1.53% Property taxes - pass-through from LDFA II 270,337 120,000 120,000 157,632 37,632 157,600 37,600 31.33% Industrial facilities taxes 353,742 388,718 341,539 384,774 405,630 20,856 405,600 64,061 5.41% Payments in lieu of taxes 75,758 73,191 80,000 80,000 70,085 (9,915) 70,000 (10,000) -12.50% Oelinguent chargeback collected 17,514 30,056 10,000 15,000 11,886 (3,114} 11,800 1,800 -21.33% $ 12,878.483 $ 13,465,040 $ 13,316,693 $ 13,164,928 $ 13,222,842 $ 57,914 $ 13,222,500 $ {94,193} 0.44% Licenses and permits Business licenses $ 31,239 $ 31,525 $ 34,500 $ 34,500 $ 28,455 $ (6,045) $ 28,400 (6,100) $ -17.68% Liquor licenses 36.427 35,542 37,500 37,500 36.427 (1,073) 36.400 (1,100) -2.93% N Cable TV franchise fees 204,820 258,425 265,000 270,000 265,532 (4,468) 265,500 500 -1.67% Telecom franchise fees (Act 48) 27,483 32,024 32,024 32,000 4,517 -0.07% Rental property registration 4,700 4,905 205 4,900 4,900 4.26% Property Maintenance Inspection Fees 66,126 64,565 75,000 75,000 91,360 16,360 91,300 16,300 21.73% Burial permits 98,735 103,636 100,000 100,000 103,564 3,564 103,500 3,500 3.50% Building permits 333,798 365,561 300,000 300,000 275,642 (24,358) 275,600 (24,400) -8.13% Electrical permits 127,055 87,788 100,000 110,000 125,718 15,718 125,700 25,700 14.27% Plumbing permits 48,863 66,741 50,000 50,000 50,030 30 50,000 0.00% Mechanical permits 65,495 56,222 80,000 100,000 94,013 (5,987) 94,000 14,000 -6.00% Franchise fees 0.00% Police gun registration 2,040 1,230 800 1,000 1,110 110 1,100 300 10.00% $ 1,014,598 $ 1,071,235 $ 1,070,283 $ 1,114,724 $ 1,108,780 $ (5,944} $ 1,108,400 $ 38,117 _"'.9.57% Federal grants Federal oeerational grant $ 417,925 $ 278,308 $ 80,000 $ 15'2.131 $ 211.597 $ 59,466 $ 211,500 131,500 $ 39.02% $ 417,925 $ 278,308 $ 80,000 $ 152,131 $ 211,597 $ 59,466 $ 211,500 $ 131,500 39.02% State grants Act 302 police training grant $ $ $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 17,148 $ 1,148 $ 17,100 $ 1,100 6.88% State oeerational grant 17,569 11,316 36,635 36,635 6,117 (30,518) 6,100 (30,535) -83.35% $ 17,569 $ 11,316 $ 52,635 $ 52,635 $ 23,265 $ (29,370) $ 23,200 $ (29.435} -55.92% State shared revenue State sales tax $G~;;;3 $ $ $ 5,353,987 5,353,987 $ $ 5,550,302 5,550,302 $ $ 5,035,082 5,035,082 $ $ 83,792 $ 4,951,200 $ 599,102 -1.67% (83,792) $ 4,951,200 $ (599,102) -1.67°/o , S:;,;,te 0/ c/11,.,..J 1.1.fZ CITY OF MUSKEGON GENERAL FUND HISTORICAL SUMMARY Revenues & Expenditures & Fund Balance Year Transfers In Transfers Out at Year~End 1993 $ 13,990,266 $ 13,231,208 $ 2,297,430 1994 15,301,973 15,572,689 2,026,714 1995 16,633,179 16,337,586 2,322,307 1996 17,666,214 18,018,159 1,970,362 1997 20,437,646 20,358,321 2,049,687 1998 21,643,855 21,634,467 2,059,075 1999 21,451,681 22,011,881 1,498,875 2000 23,685,516 22,232,657 2,951,734 2001 23,446,611 23,235,978 3,162,367 2002 23,617,163 23,971,534 2,807,996 Fiscal 2003 Budget Summary FUND BALANCE AT START OF YEAR $ 2 807 996 MEANS OF FINANCING: Taxes 13,222,842 56.7% Licenses and Permits 1,108,780 4.8% Federal Grants 211,597 0.9% State Grants 23,265 0.1% Stale Shared Revenue 4,951,290 21.2% Other Charges 2,227,215 9.6%. Interest & Rentals 189,407 0.8% Fines and Fees 471,163 2.0% Other Revenue 331,200 1.4% Other Financing Sources 576,360 2.5% 23,313,119 100.0% ESTIMATED REQUIREMENTS: Customer Value Added Activities 17,371,192 73.3% Business Value Added Activities 4,121,014 17.4% Fixed Budget Items 2213129 9.3% 23,705,335 100.0% j),<;'ff,fTll 17'' ~ ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $ 2 415 780 OPERATING DEFICIT (USE OF FUND BALANCE) $ (392,216) (' TARGET FUND BALANCE (10% PRIOR YEAR EXPENDITURES) $ 2,397,153 ESTIMATED EXCESS (SHORTFALL) vs. TARGET $ 18,627 1 City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Revenue Summary By Source Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 200_~ Original Revised Other charges for sales and services Tax administration fees $ 232,349 $ 258,323 $ 258,000 $ 258,000 $ 264,949 $ 6,949 $ 264,900 $ 6,900 2.67% Utility administration fees 175,215 174,965 183,439 183,439 183,439 183,400 (39) -0.02% Reimbursement for elections 20,534 24,455 12,000 30,000 30,648 648 30,600 18,600 2.00% Indirect cost reimbursement 908,256 892,080 974,894 974,894 974,894 974,800 (94) -0.01% Site-plan review fee 895 1,086 1,000 1,000 780 (220) 700 (300) -30.00% Sale of cemetery lots 25,275 14,988 18,000 18,000 18,233 233 18,200 200 1.11% Sale of columbarium niches 0.00% Police miscellaneous 48,873 74,044 65,000 65,000 83,060 18,060 83,000 18,000 27.69% Police impound fees 37,781 51,225 40,000 40,000 65,010 25,010 65,000 25,000 62.50% Landlord's alert fee 1,630 2,630 315 315 300 300 -4.76% Fire protection-state property 82,087 42,052 85,000 42,000 45,965 3,965 45,900 (39,100) 9.29% Zoning fees 13,915 13,955 10,000 1-3,000 11,880 (1,120) 11,800 1,800 -9.23% Clerk fees 1,391 2,738 2,230 3,000 2,022 (978) 2,000 (230) -33.33% Clerk - passport fees 3,500 2,500 1,735 (765) 1,700 (1,800) -32.00% Tax abatement application fees 4,944 1,423 1,000 12,500 16,020 3,520 16,000 15,000 28.00% w Treasurer fees 33,708 40,635 25,000 30,000 20,702 (9,298) 20,700 (4,300) -31.00% False alarm fees 18,806 17,738 10,000 15,000 11,429 (3,571) 11,400 1,400 -24.00% Miscellaneous cemetery income 24,118 25,569 21,000 24,000 21,763 (2,237) 21,700 700 -9.58% Senior transit program fees 7,986 7,376 8,000 8,000 6,651 (1,349) 6,600 (1,400) -17.50% Fire miscellaneous 9,012 3,858 15,000 5,000 11,410 6,410 11,400 (3,600) 128.00% Township electrical services 13,297 13,297 13,200 13,200 0.00% Sanitation stickers 42,355 51,081 42,000 50,000 46,205 (3,795) 46,200 4,200 -7.60% Lot cleanup fees 74,584 134,156 70,000 70,000 91,709 21,709 91,700 21,700 31.00% Reimbursements for mowing and demolitions 75,099 129,421 70,000 70,000 158,315 88,315 158,300 88,300 126.14% Special events reimbursements 30,610 30,610 30,600 30,600 0.00% Recreation er~ram fees 133,183 127,558 130,000 130,000 116,174 (13,826) 116,100 (13,900) -10.69% $ 1,971,996 $ 2,091,356 $ 2,045,063 $ 2,045,648 $ 2.227,215 $ 181,567 $ 2,226,200 $ 181,137 8.83% Interest and rental income Interest $ 331,923 $ 181,931 $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 48,505 $ (26,495) $ 48,500 $ (101,500) -35.33% Flea market 22,157 27,526 27,000 27,000 31,867 4,867 31,800 4,800 17.78% Farmers market 26,475 27,783 23,000 23,000 29,880 6,880 29,800 6,800 29.57% City right of way rental 6,400 6,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 0.00% Parking rentals 22,069 24,991 5,000 5,000 6,017 1,017 6,000 1,000 20.00% McGraft park rentals 53,758 37,697 54,000 43,000 41,338 (1,662) 41,300 (12,700) -3.95% Other eark rentals 28,081 26,232 32,200 26,965 27,400 435 27,400 {4,800} 1.61% _$_ _490,863 $ 332,560 $ 295,600 $ 204,365 $ 189,407 $ {14,958} $ 189,200 $ (106,400} -7.42% City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget • General Fund General Fund Revenue Summary By Source Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actucil Through Final Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Revised Fines and fees Income tax - penalty and interest $ 95,916 $ 166,621 $ 90,000 $ 175,000 $ 194,562 $ 19,562 $ 194,500 $ 104,500 11.14% Late fees on current taxes 27,220 18,006 25,000 25,000 52,791 27,791 52,700 27,700 110.80% Interest on late invoices 730 589 1,200 750 549 (201) 500 (700) -33,33% Property transfer affidavit fines 1,900 0.00% Parking fines 74,056 61,957 80,000 80,000 71,698 (8,302) 71,600 (8,400) -10.50% Court fines 150,735 146,141 160,000 160,000 151,563 {8,437) 151,500 ~8,500) -5.31% $ 350,557 $ 393,314 $ 356,200 $ 440,750 $ 471,163 $ 30,413 $ 470,800 $ 114,600 6.82% Other revenue Sale of land and assets $ $ $ 3,000 $ 1,000 $ $ (1,000) $ $ (3,000) -100.00% Police sale and auction proceeds 3,706 3,089 4,000 4,000 1,139 (2,861) 1,100 (2,900) -72.50% CDBG program reimbursements 322,587 372,492 250,000 250,000 234,079 (15,921) 234,000 (16,000) -6.40% Contributions 33,592 31,619 11,000 27,500 35,461 7,961 35,400 24,400 28.73% Contributions - Veteran's Park Maintenance 17,250 14,232 (3,018) 14,200 14,200 -17.68% Muskegon County Community Foundation 13,521 7,000 33,oqo 33,000 33,000 26,000 0.00% +'> Miscellaneous reimbursements 1,000 1,000 (1,000) (1,000) -100.00% Miscellaneous and sundry 17,755 18,341 15,000 15,000 13,289 {1,711} 13,200 {1,soot -12.00% $ 377,640 $ 439,062 $ 291,000 $ 348,750 $ 331,200 $ (17,550) $ 330,900 $ 39,900 ..S.12% Other financing sources Operating transfers in Cemetery Perpetual Care $ 67,373 $ 56,961 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 61,360 $ (8,640) $ 61,300 $ (8,700) -12.43% Criminal Forieitures Fund 60,000 75,000 75,000 (75,000) (75,000} -100.00% Police Training Fund 31,142 22,281 0.00% ODA for Administration 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.00% Reese Playfield Fund 4,333 76,746 0.00% RLF for Administration 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.00% Budget Stabilization Fund 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 1](500,000) 500,000 ..SO.DO% Special Assessment Fund 40,000 40,000 (40,000) (40,000) -100.00% Hackley Park Improvement Fund 0.00% Hackley Park Memorial Fund 609 9,997 0.00% $ 178,457 $ 180,985 $ 700,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 576,360 $ 623,640 $ 576,300 $ 123,700 _-_51.98% Total general fund revenues and other sources $ 23,446,611 $ 23,617,163 $ 23,757,776 y·23,759,013 $ 23,313,119 1 (445,894) $ 23,310,200 $ (447,576) -1.89% '--- ----·l,N,-· "-At>~ ,.'(J t,..,..r,_ €rr,..et'l~p/~4c City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Fina! Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original /. Customer Value Added Activities 40301 Police Department 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 5,803,534 $ 5,848,623 $ 6,324,535 $ 6."174,535 $ 6,068,410 $ 106,125 $ 6,069,000 $ (255,535) -4.04% 5200 Operating Supplies 154,660 148,091 150,000 150,000 100,795 49,205 101,000 (49,000) -32.67% 5300 Contractual Services 951,902 981,682 902,000 902,000 907,969 (5,969) 908,000 6,000 0.67% 5400 Other Expenses 54,675 73,558 28,000 28,000 15,774 12,226 16,000 (12,000) -42.86% 5700 Capital Outlays 87,593 125,512 24,310 24,310 30,581 (6,271) 31,000 6,690 27.52% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 7,052,364 $ 7,177,466 $ 7,428,845 $ 7,278,845 $ 7,123,529 s 155,316 $ 7,125,000 $ (303,845} -4.09% $ 7!052,364 $ 7,177,466 $ 7,428,845 s 7,278,845 $ 7,123,529 $ 155,316 $ 7,125,000 $ {303,845} -4.09%_ 50336 Fire Department 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 2,930,180 $ 2,964,455 $ 2,947,103 $ 2,947,103 $ 3,037,824 $ (90,721) $ 3,038,000 $ 90,897 3.08% = 5200 5300 Operating Supplies Contractual Services 92,307 149,605 105,122 165,970 100,000 150,000 100,000 200,000 95,604 187,853 4,396 12,147 96,000 188,000 (4,000) 38,000 -4.00% 25.33% 5400 Other Expenses 12,785 20,731 20,000 12,000 12,378 (378) 13,000 (7,000) -35.00% 5700 Gapital Outlays 32,714 57,570 27.469 99,600 98,132 1,468 99,000 71,531 260.41% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 3,217,591 $ 3,313,848 $ 3,244,572 $ 3,358,703 $ 3,431,791 $ {73,088} $ 3,434,000 $ 189.428 5.84% 50387 Fire Safety Inspections 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 579,330 $ 693,916 $ 782,418 $ 782,418 $ 761,792 $ 20,626 $ 762,000 $ (20,418) -2.61% 5200 Operating Supplies 25,077 22,393 25,500 25,500 18,780 6,720 19,000 (6,500) -25.49% 5300 Contractual Services 232,848 266,610 260,606 260,606 152,279 108,327 153,000 (107,606} -41.29% 5400 Other Expenses 8,109 11,903 10,000 10,000 11,094 (1,094) 12,000 2,000 20.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 15,215 11,536 3,000 3,000 3,616 (616) 4,000 1,000 33.33% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 860,579 $ 1,006,358 $ 1,081,524 $ 1,081,524 $ 947,561 $ 133,963 $ 950,000 $ (131,524} -12.16% $ 4,078,170 $ 4,320,206 $ 4,326,096 $ 4,440,227 $ 4,379,352 $ 60,875 $ 4,384,000 $ 57,904 1.34% 60523 General Sanitation 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 67,901 $ 67,465 $ 78,067 $ 78,067 $ 75,757 $ 2,310 $ 76,000 $ (2,067) -2.65% 5200 Operating Supplies 1,006 344 900 3,500 109 3,391 1,000 100 11.11% 5300 Contractual Services 1,351,420 1,406,612 1,432,282 1,442,282 1,491,309 (49,027) 1,492,000 59,718 4.17% 5400 Other Expenses 83 794 300 300 65 235 1,000 700 233.33% 5700 Capita! Outlays 24,847 44,725 25,660 41,399 41,399 42,000 16,340 63.68% 5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 1,445,257 $ 1,519,940 $ 1,537,209 $ 1,565,548 $ 1,608,639 $ (43,091) $ 1,612,000 $ 74,791 4.87% City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Fina! Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original 60528 Recycling 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00% 5200 Operating Supplies 0.00% 5300 Contractual SeNices 257,926 218,067 260,000 250,000 230,058 19,942 231,000 {29,000) -11.15% 5400 Other Expenses 0.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 3,305 1,500 3,250 3,250 4,000 2,500 166.67% 5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 261,231 $ 218,067 $ 261,500 $ 253,250 $ 233,308 $ 19,942 $ 235,000 $ [26,500} -10.13% 60550 Stormwater Management 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ 7,372 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 3,835 $ 6,165 $ 4,000 $ (16,000) -80.00% 5200 Operating Supplies 4,450 1,500 501 999 1,000 (3,450) -77.53°/o 5300 Contractual Services 16,352 28,000 10,000 2,569 7,431 3,000 (25,000) -89.29% 5400 Other Expenses 600 200 200 (600) -100.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 2,500 1,000 1,000 (2,500) -100.00% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ $ 23,724 $ 55,550 $ 22,700 $ 6,905 $ 15,795 $ 8,000 $ (47,550} -85.60% CJ') 60448 Streetlighting 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 11,387 $ 12,983 $ $ 2,000 $ 842 $ 1,158 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 0.00% 5200 Operating Supplies 0.00% 5300 Contractual Services 504,551 505,079 515,000 510,000 504,832 5,168 505,000 (10,000) -1.94% 5400 Other Expenses 0.00% 5700 Gapita! Outlays 4,350 5,000 4,000 3,850 150 4,000 (1,000) -20.00% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 515.938 $ 522,412 $ 520,000 $ 516,000 $ 509,524 $ 6,476 $ 510,000 $ (10,000} ~1.92% 60707 Senior Citizen Transit 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 44,925 $ 44,863 $ 47,833 $ 44,690 $ 38,746 $ 5,944 $ 39,000 $ (8,833) -18.47% 5200 Operating Supplies 0.00% 5300 Contractual Services 7,100 10,140 7,540 10,140 10,140 11,000 3,460 45.89% 5400 Other Expenses 0.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 0.00% 5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 52,025 $ 55,003 $ 55,373 $ 54,830 $ 48,886 $ 5.944 $ 50!000 $ {5,373} -9.70% 60446 Community Event Support 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 77,841 $ 31,192 $ 76,972 $ 76,972 $ 34,581 $ 42,391 $ 35,000 $ (41,972) -54.53% 5200 Operating Supplies 1,971 1,524 2,000 2,000 2,949 (949) 3,000 1,000 50.00% 5300 Contractual Services 31,071 11,004 15,000 15,000 17,574 (2,574) 18,000 3,000 20.00% 5400 Other Expenses 0.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 0.00% 590Q Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 110,883 $ 43,720 $ 93,972 $ 93,972 $ 55,104 $ 38.868 $ 56,000 $ (37.972) -40.41o/~ $ 2.385.334 $ 2,382,866 $ 2.523,604 $ 2,506.300 $ 2,462,366 $ 43,934 $ 2,471,000 $ {52,604) City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Fina! Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original 70751 Parks Maintenance 510_9 Salaries & Benefits $ 470,749 $ 476,360 $ 552,349 $ 552,349 $ 478,197 $ 74,152 $ 479,000 $ (73,349) -13.28% 5200 Operating Supplies 240,998 150,285 180,000 150,000 140,573 9,427 141,000 (39,000) -21.67% 53()0 Contractual Services 596,720 601,199 500,000 515,000 586,465 (71,465) 587,000 87,000 17.40% 5400 Other Expenses 2,905 2,548 2,000 2,000 168 1,832 1,000 (1,000) -50.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 75,959 152,224 52,929 52,929 85,387 (32,458} 86,000 33,071 62.48% 5~00 Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 1,387,331 $ 1,382,616 $ 1,287,278 $ 1,272,278 $ 1,290,790 $ {18,512} $ 1,294,000 $ 6,722 0.52% 70757 Mc Graft Park Maintenance 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 5,030 $ 6,059 $ 18,005 $ 18,005 $ 8,765 $ 9,240 $ 9,000 $ (9,005) -50.01% 5200 Operating Supplies 4,918 4,135 4,031 4,031 5,306 {1,275) 6,000 1,969 48.85% 5300 Contractual Services 42,488 30,762 24,000 24,000 30,830 (6,830) 31,000 7,000 29.17% 5400 Other Expenses 238 56 200 200 200 {200) -100.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 65 7,800 1,000 39 961 1,000 (6,800) -87.18% .?.900 Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 52,739 $ 41,012 $ 54,036 $ 47,236 $ 44,940 $ 2,296 $ 47,000 $ {7,036) -13.02% 70775 General & Inner City Recreation 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 283,433 $ 281,055 $ 341,290 $ 341,290 $ 290,235 $ 51,055 $ 291,000 $ (50,290) -14.74% 5200 Operating Supplies 51,416 58,590 55,386 52,886 41,843 11,043 42,000 {13,386) -24.17% ---..J 5300 Contractual Services 135,564 137,912 97,823 97,823 123,619 (25,796) 124,000 26,177 26.76% 5400 Other Expenses 9,252 10,375 4,350 7,000 6,967 33 7,000 2,650 60.92% 5700 Capita! Outlays 383 2,500 2,127 373 3,000 3,000 0.00% 5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 480,048 $ 487,932 $ 498,849 $ 501.499 $ 464,791 $ 36,708 $ 467,000 $ {31,849) -6.38% 70276 Cemeteries Maintenance 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 185,819 $ 188,401 $ 196,834 $ 196,834 $ 205,975 $ (9,141) $ 206,000 $ 9,166 4.66% 5200 Operating Supplies 21,908 22,607 20,000 20,000 10,846 9,154 11,000 (9,000) -45.00% 53()0 Contractual Services 263,671 258,681 255,000 255,000 251,300 3,700 252,000 (3,000) -1.18% 5400 Other Expenses 1,199 1·, 121 1,000 1,000 751 249 1,000 0.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 33,975 14,626 33,165 33,165 41,908 (8,743) 42,000 8,835 26.64% 5900 Other Financing Us~$ ___ · - - - - · - _ 0.00% $ 506,572 $ 485.436 $ 505,999 $. 505,999 $ 510,780 $ {4,781) $ 512,000 $ 6,001 1.1§1% 70585 Parking Operations 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 13,439 $ 14,831 $ 14,549 $ 14,549 $ 18,010 $ (3,461) $ 19,000 $ 4,451 30.59% 5200 Operating Supplies 2,476 1,032 3,000 3,000 1,738 1,262 2,000 (1,000) -33.33% 5300 Contractual Services 32,854 40,972 28,802 75,000 235,608 (160,608) 236,000 207,198 719.39% 5400 Other Expenses 0.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 4,503 0.00% 5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 48,769 $ 61,338 $ 46,351 $ 92,549 $ 255,356 $ (162,807) $ 257,000 $ 210,619_ 4940 46% 70771 Forestry 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 86,584 $ 84,297 $ 111,664 $ 100,000 $ 103,509 $ (3,509) $ 104,000 $ (7.664) -6.86% 5200 Operating Supplies 9,831 6,024 7,800 7,800 8,075 (275) 9,000 1,200 15.38%, 5300 Contractual Services 14,244 13,864 17,000 20,000 21,692 (1,692) 22,000 5,000 29.41% 5400 Other Expenses 1,309 394 1,500 1,500 940 560 1,000 (500) -33.33% 5700 Capital Outlays 2,101 2,844 4,359 4,359 2,458 1,901 3,000 (1,359) -31.18% 5900 __ _Qther Financin Uses 0.00% $ 114,069 $ 107,423 $ 142,323 $ 133,659 $ 136,674 $ (3,015) $ 139,000 $ (3,323) -2.33% City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function Last Budget % Change Ori9ina1 Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original OriQinal 70863 Farmers' Market & Flea Market 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 28,023 $ 29,241 $ 34,258 $ 34,258 $ 30,792 $ 3.466 $ 31,000 $ (3,258) M9.51% 5200 Operating Supplies 860 1,644 1,000 1,000 465 535 1,000 0.00% 5300 Contractual Services 19,175 14,292 7,230 7,230 14,462 (7,232) 15,000 7,770 107.47% 5400 Other Expenses 0.00% 5700 Capita! Outlays 225 225 1,000 1,000 0.00% 5900 Other Finci_[!c:_i_ng Uses 0.00% $ 48,058 $ 45,177 $ 42,488 $ 42,713 -$ 45,944 $ (3,231) $ 48,000 $ 5,512 12.97% $ 2,637,586 $ 2,610,934 $ 2,577,324 $ 2,595,933 $ 2,749,275 $ (153,342) $ 2,764,000 $ 186,676 7.24% 80799 Weed and Seed Program 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00% 5200 Operating Supplies 0.00% 5300 Contractual Services 0.00% 5400 Other Expenses 0.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 0.00% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% s $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.0_0% 80387 Environmental Services co 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 179,865 $ 173,926 $ 201,491 $ 201,491 $ 181,136 $ 20,355 $ 182,000 $ (19,491) -9.67% 5200 Operating Supplies 9,023 12,389 11,000 8,000 7,859 141 8,000 (3,000) -27.27% 5300 Contractual Services 244,510 300,582 194,806 210,730 281,831 {71,101) 282,000 87,194 44.76% 5400 Other Expenses 1,633 1,505 2,000 200 189 11 1,000 {1,000) -50.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 6,556 16,123 4,000 4,000 3,396 604 4,000 0.00% 5900 Other Financing US!;)L _ 0.00% $ 441,587 $ 504,525 $ 413 297 $ 424.421 $ 474,411 $ (49.990) $ 477,000 $ 63.703 15.41% $ 441,587 $ 504,525 $ 413.297 $ ·424,421 $ 474,411 $ {49.990) $ 477,000 $ 63.703 15.41% 10875 Other - Contributions to Outside Agencies Muskegon Area Transit (MATS} $ 80,163 $ 80,163 $ 80,500 $ 80,500 $ 80,163 $ 337 $ 81,000 500 0.62% Neighborhood Association Grants 34,063 35,975 36,000 30,000 29,308 30,000 (6,000) -16.67% Muskegon Area First 46,066 42,000 42,000 42.000 42,000 0.00% Veterans Memorial Day Costs 7,535 8,070 8,506 7,898 7,898 8,000 (500) -5.88% WMSRDC - Muskegon Area Plan (MAP) 6,151 6,151 0.00% Institute for Healing Racism 3,000 4,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 0.00% MLK Diversity Program 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.00% Muskegon Area Labor Management (MALMC) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.00% Sister Cities' Youth Travel 1,000 0.00% Muskegon County and Humane Society - Feral Cat Control 14,157 16,000 16,000 17,890 18,000 2,000 12.50% Other 0.00% _Cqntrib_utions To Outside Agencies $ 132,912 $ 195.582 $ 188,000 $ 181,398 $ 182,259 $ (861l $ 184,000 $ (4,000) -2.13% $ 132,912 $ 195,582 $ 188,000 $ 181,398 $ 182,259 $ (861} $ 184.000 $ (4,000) -2.13% Total Customer Value Added Activities $ 16,727,953 $ 17,191,579 $ 17,457,166 $ 17,427,124 $ 17.371,192 $ 55,932 $ 17,405,000 $ (52,166) -0.30% As a Percent of Total General Fund Expenditures 72.0% 71.7% 73.2% 73.3% 73,3% 73.2% City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget2003 2003 Original Original II. Business Value Added Activities 10101 City Commission 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 56,483 $ 60,555 $ 62,793 $ 62,793 $ 59,698 $ 3,095 $ 60,000 $ (2,793) -4.45% 5200 Operating Supplies 12,288 12,538 16,000 14,000 9,367 4,633 10,000 (6,000) -37.50% 5300 Contractual Services 36,894 48,510 41,964 30,000 28,258 1,742 29,000 (12,964) -30.89% 5400 Other Expenses 7,631 9,758 11,000 8,000 6,126 1,874 7,000 (4,000) -36.36% 5700 Capital Outlays 528 0.00% 5900 Ottier Financing Uses 0.00% $ 113,296 $ 131,889 $ 131,757 $ 114,793 $ 103,449 $ 11,344 $ 106,000 $ {25,757) -19.55% 10102 City Promotions & Public Relations 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00% 5200 Operating Supplies 10,000 4,000 2,643 1,357 3,000 (7,000) -70.00% 5300 Contractual Services 24,563 26,499 35,572 29,450 27,909 1,541 28,000 (7,572) -21.29% 5400 Other Expenses 8 0.00% 5700 Gapital Outlays 0.00% (D 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 24,563 $ 26,507 $ 45,572 $ 33,450 $ 30,552 $ 2,898 $ 31,000 $ {14,572) -31.98% 10172 City Manager 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 168,180 $ 173,154 $ 189,451 $ 189,451 $ 182,226 $ 7,225 $ 183,000 $ (6,451) -3.41% 5200 Operating Supplies 1,651 1,683 2,750 2,500 1,846 654 2,000 (750) -27.27% 5300 Contractual Services 2,055 2,563 3,750 3,opo 2,609 391 3,000 (750) -20.00% 5400 Other Expenses 2,149 3,037 2,750 2,300 1,646 654 2,000 (750) -27.27% 5700 Capital Outlays 102 1,500 500 500 (1,500) -100.00% 5900 0th~ Fir,c1ndng Uses 0.00% $ 174,035 $ 180,539 $ 200,201 $ 197,751 $ 188,327 $ 9,424 $ 190,000 $ {10,201) -5.10% 10145 City Attorney 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00% 5200 Operating Supplies 833 869 1,000 1,000 869 131 1,000 0.00% 5300 Contractual Services 457,739 449,721 423,201 423,201 383,732 39,469 384,000 (39,201) -9.26% 5400 Other Expenses 0.00% 5700 Gapital Outlays 0.00% 5900 _QJt_:i~ir,andng Uses 0.00% $ 458,572 $ 450,590 $ 424,201 $ 424,201 $ 384,601 $ 39,600 $ 385,000 $ (39,201} -9.24% $ 770,466 $ 789,525 $ 801,731 $ 770,195 $ 706,929 $ 63,266 $ 712,000 $ (89,731) -11.19% 20173 Administration 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 120,324 $ 129,504 $ 136,911 $ 136,911 $ 133,545 $ 3,366 $ 134,000 $ (2,911) -2.13% 5200 Operating Supplies 1,784 2,050 2,500 2,000 1,437 563 2,000 (500) -20.00% 5300· Contractual Services 15,734 16,255 20,973 18,973 6,012 12,961 7,000 (13,973) -66.62% 5400 Other Expenses 7,230 5,415 8,000 4,500 2,703 1,797 3,000 (5,000) -62.50% 5700 Gapital Outlays 1,632 73 2,000 2,000 2,013 (13) 3,000 1,000 50.00% 5900 Other FinanQ_11_gJ)s$S 0.00% $ 146,704 $ 153,297 $ 170,384 $ 164,384 $ 145,710 $ 18,674 $ 149,000 $ {21,384) -12.55% City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget • General Fund General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget2D03 2003 Original Original 20228 Affirmative Action 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 72,256 $ 84,810 $ 92,465 $ 92,465 $ 93,074 $ (609) $ 94,000 1,535 $ 1.66% 5200 Operating Supplies 1,713 757 2,672 500 528 (28) 1,000 (1,672) -62.57% 5300 Contractual Services 1,759 1,356 1,872 1,000 1,553 (553) 2,000 128 6.84% 5400 Other Expenses 2,913 4,187 4,803 1,500 1,572 (72) 2,000 {2,803) -58.36% 5700 Capita! Outlays 649 723 977 (977) 1,000 1,000 0.00% .5~00 Other Financin Uses 0.00%, $ 79,290 $ 91,833 $ 101,812 $ 95,465 $ 97,704 $ (2,239) $ 100,000 $ (1,812) -1.7§% 20744 Julia Hackley Internships 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 10,692 $ 8,885 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,837 $ (837) $ 8,000 1,000 $ 14.29% 5200 Operating Supplies 10 (10) w1Q0.00% 5300 Contractual Services 0.00% 5400 Other Expenses 20 0.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 0.00% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 10,712 $ 8,885 $ 7,010 $ 7,000 $ 7,837 $ (837} $ 8,000 $ 990 14.12% 20215 City Clerk & Elections 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 208,602 $ 234,459 $ 245,398 $ 235,498 $ 237,090 $ (1,592) $ 238,000 $ (7,398) w3.01% 5200 Operating Supplies 35,327 45,977 20,300 27,245 33,167 (5,922) 34,000 13,700 67.49% ~ 5300 Contractual Services 31,458 62,596 41,000 36,500 42,598 {6,098) 43,000 2,000 4.88% 0 5400 Other Expenses 7,136 5,437 3,000 4,000 5,156 {1,156) 6,000 3,000 100.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 5,199 5,813 2,000 1,500 1,910 (410) 2,000 0.00% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 287.722 $ 354,282 $ 311,698 $ 304,743 $ 319,921 $ (15,178) $ 323,000 $ 11,302 3.63% 20220 Civil Service 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 132,405 $ 160,513 $ 172,583 $ 172,583 $ 176,851 $ (4,268) $ 177,000 $ 4,417 2.56% 5200 Operating Supplies 17,111 15,396 10,950 10,950 10,642 308 11,000 50 0.46% 5300 Contractual Services 22,799 22,138 23,200 23,200 19,767 3,433 20,000 (3,200} w13.79% 5400 Other Expenses 12,336 9,108 6,000 6,000 7,534 (1,534) 8,000 2,000 33.33% 5700 Capital Outlays 8,600 1,129 1,278 1,278 1,278 (1,278) w100.00% 5900 Oth_er Financing Uses 0.00% $ 193,251 $ 2081284 $ 214,011 $ 214,011 $ 214,794 $ {783) $ 216,000 $ 1,989 0.93% $ 717,679 $ 816,581 $ 804,915 $ 785,603 $ 785,966 $ {363) $ 796,000 $ (8,915) w1.11% 30202 Finance Administration 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 267,254 $ 280,785 $ 300,307 $ 300,307 $ 297,906 $ 2,401 $ 298,000 $ (2,307) w0.77% 5200 Operating Supplies 9,554 6,663 6,600 6,305 7,010 (705) 8,000 1,400 21.21% 5300 Contractual Services 99,977 115,025 87,050 99,600 87,221 12,379 88,000 950 1.09% 5400 Other Expenses 2,348 3,935 2,538 500 156 344 1,000 (1,538) wG0.60% 5700 Capital Outlays 2,085 4,730 2,100 3,784 (1,684) 4,000 4,000 0.00% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 381,218 $ 411,138 $ 396,495 $ 408,812 $ 396,077 $ 12,735 $ 399,000 $ 2,505 0.63% 30209 Assessing Services 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 6,759 $ 6,093 $ 7,620 $ 7,620 $ 6,199 $ 1,421 $ 7,000 $ (620) -8.14% 5200 Operating Supplies 0.00% 5300 Contractual Services 367,367 390,926 398,051 398,051 394,707 3,344 395,000 (3,051) -0.77% 5400 Other Expenses 45 60 100 100 80 20 1,000 900 900.00% 5700 Capita! Outlays 0.00% 5900 Ott)er Financing Uses 0.00% $ 374,171 $ 397,079 $ 405,771 $ 405,771 $ 400,986 $ 4.785 $ 403,000 $ (2,771) -0.68% City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original 30205 Income Tax Administration 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 213,846 $ 194,487 $ 227,024 $ 227,024 $ 229,175 $ (2,151) $ 230,000 $ 2,976 1.31% 5200 Operating Supplies 24,678 21,941 24,800 24,800 20,667 4,133 21,000 (3,800) -15.32% 5300 Contractual Services 34,092 49,928 40,263 40,263 46,251 {5,988) 47,000 6,737 16.73% 5400 Other Expenses 1,648 1,410 1,000 1,000 642 358 1,000 0.00% 5700 Capita! Outlays 206 5,807 2,000 2,000 1,437 563 2,000 0.00% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 2741470 $ 273,573 $ 295,087 $ 295,087 $ 298,172 $ {3,085} $ 301,000 $ 5,913 i.00% 30253 City Treasurer 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 236,759 $ 272,839 $ 295,645 $ 295,645 $ 290,796 $ 4,849 $ 291,000 $ (4,645) -1.57% 5200 Operating Supplies 35,489 32,865 32,232 32,232 33,750 (1,518) 34,000 1,768 5.49% 5300 Contractual Services 49,210 43,750 33,500 41,000 65,831 (24,831) 66,000 32,500 97.01% 5400 Other Expenses 900 2,933 1,500 1,500 545 955 1,000 (500) -33.33% 5700 Capital Outlays 4,281 12,653 4,000 4,000 2,652 1,348 3,000 (1,000) -25.00% 5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00% $ 326,639 $ 365,040 $ 366,877 $ 374,377 $ 393,574 $ {19,197) $ 395,000 $ 28,123 7.67% 30248 Information Systems Administration 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 182,403 $ 235,640 $ 259,055 $ 259,055 $ 260,209 $ (1,154) $ 261,000 $ 1,945 0.75% 5200 Operating Supplies 2,024 2,345 4,700 4,700 1,361 3,339 2,000 (2,700) -57.45% 5300 Contractual Services 72,769 66,905 53,249 53,249 44,653 8,596 45,000 (8,249) ~ -15.49% ~ 5400 Other Expenses 12,457 8,049 9,000 9,000 7,619 1,381 8,000 (1,000) -11.11% 5700 Capital Outlays 53,828 37,893 26,497 26,497 43,907 (17,410) 44,000 17,503 66.06% 5900 Other Fin.@!l.fk!g__l,J_§f:!S 0.00% $ 323,481 $ 350,832 $ 352,501 $ 352,501 $ 357,749 $ {5,248) $ 360,000 $ 7,499 2.13% $ 1,679,979 $ 1,797,662 $ 1,816,731 $ 1,836,548 $ 1,846,558 $ (10,010) $ 1,858,000 $ 41,269 2.27% 60265 City Hall Maintenance 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 64,853 $ 66,138 $ 65,153 $ 65,153 $ 67,355 $ (2,202) $ 68,000 $ 2,847 4.37% 5200 Operating Supplies 12,457 15,693 14,850 14,850 12,925 1,925 13,000 (1,850) -12.46% 5300 Contractual Services 214,595 203,498 190,000 190,000 188,186 1,814 189,000 (1,000) -0.53% 5400 Other Expenses 598 500 500 500 (500) -100.00% 5700 Capital Outlays 253 12,500 8,477 8,477 409 8,068 1,000 (7,477) -88.20% 5900 Other Financingl,Jses 0.00% $ 292,756 $ 297,829 $ 278,980 $ 278,980 $ 268,875 $ 10,105 $ 271,000 $ (7,980) -2.86% $ 292,756 $ 297,829 $ 278,980 $ 278,980 $ 268,875 $ 10,105 $ 271,000 $ (7,980) -2.86"{0_ 80400 Planning, Zoning and Economic Development 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 387,005 $ 393,435 $ 437,835 $ 437,835 $ 424,969 $ 12,866 $ 425,000 $ (12,835) -2.93% 5200 Operating Supplies 19,455 12,765 14,000 16,000 14,518 1,482 15,000 1,000 7.14% 5300 Contractual Services 87,314 44,078 50,300 50,300 67,030 (16,730) 68,000 17,700 35.19% 5400 Other Expenses 9,751 10,293 6,964 6,964 4,278 2,686 5,000 (1,964) -28.20% 5700 Capital Outlays 3,644 6,239 3,000 3,000 1,891 1,109 2,000 (1,000) -33.33% 5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00% $ 507,169 $ 466,810 $ 512,099 $ 514,099 $ 512,686 $ 1,413 $ 515,000 $ 2,901 0.57% $ 507,169 $ 466,810 $ 512,099 $ 514,099 $ 512,686 $ 1,413 $ 515,000 $ 2 901 0.57% Total Business Value Added Activities $ 3,968,049 $ 4,168,407 $ 4,214,456 $ 4,185,425 $ 4,121,014 $ 64,411 $ 4,152,000 $ (62,456) -1.48% As a Percent of Total General Fund Ex_p~nditures 17.1% 17.4% 17.7% 17.6% 17.4% 17.5% City of Muskegon Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function Last Budget % Change Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003 Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original II. Fixed Budget Items 30999 Transfers To Other Funds Major Street Fund $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00% Local Street Fund 820,000 850,000 700,000 620,000 870,000 (250,000) 870,000 170,000 24.29% Budget Stabilization Fund 250,000 0.00% L.C. Walker Arena Fund (Operating Subsidy) 301,000 271,837 260,000 140,000 210,000 (70,000) 210,000 (50,000) ·19.23% Public Improvement Fund (Fire Equipment Reserve) 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0.00% State Grants Fund (Grant Matches) 105,000 10,856 (10,856) 11,000 11,000 0.00% MOD State Rehab Loan Fund TJFA Debt Service Fund 0.00% 0.00% Irge_ R,eplacem~ 0.00% $ 1,521,000 $ 1,476,837 $ 1,110,000 $ 910,000 $ 1,240,856 $ {330,856) $ 1,241,000 $ 131,000 11.80% ~ N 30851 General Insurance $ 236,222 $ 281,887 $ 365,000 $ 350,000 $ 335,805 $ 14,195 336,000 $ $ {29,000) -7.95% 30906 Debt Retirement 375,101 216,860 212,006 220,000 2'17,397 2,603 218,000 5,994 2.83% 10891 Contingency and Bad Debt Expense 268,110 495,550 400,000 400,000 133,761 266,239 134,000 (266,000) -66.50% 90000 Major Capital Improvements 139,543 140,414 85,000 276,662 285,310 (8,648) 286,000 201,000 236.47% Total Fixed-Budget Items $ 2,539,976 $ 2,611,548 $ 2,172,006 $ 2,156,662 $ 2,213,129 $ (56,467) $ 2,215,000 $ 42,994 1.98% As a Percent of Total General Fund Expenditures 10.9% 10.9% 9.1% 9.1% 9.3% 9.3% Total General Fund $ 23,235,978 $ 23,971,534 $ 23,843,628 $ 23,769,211 $ 23,705,335 $ 63,876 $ 23,772,000 (71,628) $ -0.30% p.e,,,-~ <'fh1rrvll<IK ('.'J_,.n, 5100 Recap: Total General Fund By Expenditure Object Salaries & Benefits $ 12,895,861 $ 13,226,336 $ 14,246,608 $ 14,063,901 $ 13,805,336 $ te $ 13,819,000 $ (427,608) -3.00% 5200 Operating Supplies 790,815 705,722 728,431 690,299 586,173 598,000 (130,431) -17.91% 5300 Contractual Services 6,991,218 7,496,547 7,092,034 7,173,996 7,108,532 7,126,000 33,966 0.48% 5400 Other Expenses 159,350 186,615 127,105 108,264 86,383 98,000 (29,105) ·22.90% 5700 Capital Outlays 502,633 662,617 327,444 602,751 660,658 672,000 344,556 105.23% 5900 All Other Flnancin Uses 1,896,101 1,693,697 1,322,006 1,130,000 1,458,253 1,459,000 136,994 10.36% Total General Fund $ 23,235,978 $ 23,971,534 $ 23,843,628 $ 23.769,211 $ 23,705,335 $ 23.772,000 $ (71.628) -0.30% It 4,c,,/ f r /Lt'.' wn)J:',.~ rrlJu> /:en /~,y<l,J ,,ff'-< I .!~1-~,> City of Muskegon 2002 Final Amended Budget. Other Budgeted Funds Last Budget Original Budget Reforecast Actual Thru Final 2003 Change From Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Ameded Budget Latest Reforecast Other Budgeted Funds • Revenues Special Revenue Funds: 202 Motor Vehicle Highway - Major $ 9,316,368 $ 14,901,503 $ 9,699,503 $ 7,745,604 $ 8,345,600 $ (1,353,903) 203 Motor Vehicle Highway - Local 1,847,769 1,584,351 3,005,351 3,659,920 3,659,900 654,549 254 LC Walker Arena 895,590 855,500 872,800 927,448 927,400 54,600 230 Enterprise Community Fund 85,981 85,900 85,900 257 Budget Stabllizatlon Fund 260 Land Reutilization Fund 553 1,000 1,000 414 400 (600) 285 Tree Replacement Fund 204 3,000 3,000 5,204 5,200 2,200 264 Criminal Forleitures Fund 97,071 50,000 5,000 39,944 39,900 34,900 $ 12,157,555 $ 17,395,354 $ 13,586,654 $ 12,464,515 $ 13,064,300 $ (522,354) Other Budgeted Funds • Expenditures Special Revenue Funds: 202 Motor Vehicle Highway - Major $ 10,056,265 $ 16,260,703 $ 10,877,703 $ 8,135,648 $ 8,736,000 $ (2,141,703) 203 Motor Vehicle Highway - Local 1,994,815 1,619,186 3,012,186 3,466,872 3,467,000 454,814 254 LC Walker Arena 880,247 874,081 874,081 928,571 929,000 54,919 230 Enterprise Community Fund 85,981 86,000 86,000 257 Budget Stabilization Fund 500,000 400,000 400,000 (100,000) 260 Land Reutlllzation Fund 1,000 1,000 (1,000) 285 Tree Replacement Fund 1,075 3,000 3,000 400 1,000 (2,000) 264 Criminal Forfeitures Fund 16 478 75,000 75,000 1,972 2,000 (73,000) $ 12,948,880 $ 18,832,970 $ 15,342,970 $ 13,019,444 $ 13,621,000 $ (1,721,970) Other Budgeted Funds • Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Special Revenue Funds: 202 Motor Vehicle Highway• Major $ (739,897) $ (1,359,200) $ (1,178,200) $ (390,044) $ (390,400) $ 787,800 203 Motor Vehicle Highway• Local (147,046) (34,835) (6,835) 193,048 192,900 199,735 254 LC Walker Arena 15,343 (18,581) (1,281) (1,123) (1,600) (319) 230 Enterprise Community Fund (100) (100) 257 Budget Stabilization Fund (500,000) (400,000) (400,000) 100,000 260 Land Reutilization Fund 553 414 400 400 .285 Tree Replacement Fund (871) 4,804 4,200 4,200 264 Criminal Forfeitures Fund 80,593 (25,000) (70,000) 37,972 37,900 107,900 $ (791,325) $ (1,437,616) $ (1,756,316) $ (554,929) $ (556,700) $ 1,199,616 13 Date: February 9, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission From: DPW - Water Filtration Plant RE: Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvements project SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To enlist Muskegon Construction Company to perform the Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvement project at the Water Filtration Plant. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Additional project cost of $256,800.00. BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: The project cost will be funded with Drinking Water Revolving Loan Fund (DWRF) money. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend making a change to the Water Filtration Plant Improvements project contract with Muskegon Construction Company, to perform the Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvement project at an additional cost of $256,800.00. MEMORANDUM 1/28/04 TO: R. KUHN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: R. VENEKLASEN, WATER FILTRATION SUPV. RE: LABORATORY REMODELING PROJECT BIDS PROJECT BACKGROUND The laboratory remodeling was first recommended in the 1991 Reliability Study as a Priority 111 item The study suggests, "Remodel the existing laboratory into a Plant control room and shift operator offices and remodel the second floor to proivde for additional laboratory space". The recommendation also provided for remodeling of the east plant entrance and making better use of the existing lobby. The east entrance was updated as part of the Multi-Purpose Building project. The second floor suggestions is no longer necessary due tot he abandonment of the room previously used for chlorine storage and application. Portions of this recommendation are included in the following explanation HISTORY The present laboratory is a mix of two eras; the original 1937 laboratory to the south and the 1964 addition on the north end which included the Plant control panel. The control panel was replaced in 1993 with computers as part of the Instrumentation and Control project. To date, both portions of the laboratory/control room have the original fixtures, cabinets, and benchtops. LABORATORY REMODELING The remodeling is planned to update furnishings of 40 to 65 years of age and to create more efficient workspaces. It is intended to create an operation/control area, treatment wet-lab area, bacteriological lab area, and a work are for the Chief Operator. The intent is to enlarge the laboratory area into a portion of the space occupied by the present staff break/lunch room. The present locker room space is inadequate as it cannot accommodate lockers for all ten staff members. By using the remainder fo the breakroom space , the locker room will be capable of accommodating all staff members. The old chlorine room has been vacant since we began the use of sodium hypochlorite and it's application from the Multi-Purpose Building. It is expected this room will become the break/lunch room. The akjacent room previously used for aluminum sulfate and fluoride application pumps and equipment will be used as a kitchenette - for such things as the coffeemaker, microwave, oven, and refrigerator. The aluminum sulfate and fluoride is now applied from the Multi-Purpose Building. PROJECT PLAN This project has been included in the City's Capitol Improvements Plan for a number of years. It is presently schedule for the 2005 budget year at a proposed amount of $400,000. This cost is based on the 1991 Reliability Study estimate and subsequent increases in the Engineering News Record (ENR). SCHEDULE The Finance Director contracted me with the indication that we should consider adding any planned projects to the present Drinking Water Revolving Fund (DWRF) funding application. He makes this recommendation due to the attractive interest rate currently being offered by the DWRF program and that is it unlikely we will utilize this program in the near future. He further indicated this funding has the most attractive interest rate the City will experience for some time. FUNDING To date, the DWRF program deadlines for funding this project have been met. The engineering/design and construction oversight cost for the project were approved by the City Commission in November of 2003. It is anticipated the laboratory remodeling project will be approved by the City Commission prior to the DWRF February 17 application deadline and construction costs will be paid by DWRF funding. BIDS Bids for the construction of the remodeling project were solicited with contractor responses publicly opened on January 27, 2004. The following is a summary of the responses. FIRM BOND COST CD Barnes Associates, Inc. Yes $448,566.00 3734 Eastern Avenue, SE Grand Rapids, Ml 49508 Muskegon Construction Co. Yes $256,800.00 111 West Western Avenue Muskegon, Ml 49443-0477 Tridonn Construction Co. Yes $299,498.00 1461 Evanston Avenue Muskegon, Ml 49442 RECOMMENDATION It is my recommendation that the City endorse Muskegon Construction Company as the lowest responsible bidder to perform the Water Filtration Plant Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvements project at a cost of $256,800.00. Further, it is recommended the project become a change order to the existing Water Filtration Plant Improvements project contract to streamline staff efforts and paperwork; with the understanding that bonding and insurance coverage is to be altered to encompass the additional work. January 28, 2004 Mr. Robert Veneklasen Water Filtration Plant Supervisor City of Muskegon Water Filtration Plant 1900 Beach Street Muskegon,MI 49441 Re: Muskegon Wate1· Filtrntion Plant Laborntory Impl'OVements Contract No. 0482.031-W-2 Dear Mr. Veneklasen: Bids were received for the above project on January 27, 2004. A total of three bids were received as follows: Muskegon Construction Company $256,800.00 Tridonn Construction Company $299,498.00 C.D. Barnes Associates, Inc. $448,566.00 We have reviewed the bid documents provided to us that were submitted by Muskegon Construction Company. The bid, as submitted, appears to be in order and all documents are complete. We have discussed the bid submittal with Mr. Tom Lambe1t of Muskegon Construction Company. Muskegon Construction Company is confident that they have the entire project adequately covered. Part of the reason that their bid was substantially below our opinion of construction cost for this project ($480,000) was that their General Conditions and Project Administration costs will be covered as part of the W-1 Contract. Therefore, we recommend that the City award this contract to Muskegon Construction Company for the amount of $256,800. We have discussed the possibility that this contract could be included as a change order to the W-1 contract with Mr. Michael Cox of Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Mr. Cox has indicated that this project could be implemented as a Change Order to the W-1 contract. Doing so at this point will not mean that Mr. Robert Veneklasen Muskegon Water Filtration Plant Laboratory Improvements January 28, 2004 Page 2 this amount will be part of the 4% project contingency. Therefore, we recommend that the City issue a Change Order to Muskegon Construction Company to have the work of the W-2 Contract incorporated into the W-1 Contract. This approach would be preferred since the paperwork and other administrative cost would be minimized. We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service to the City of Muskegon. Please feel free to contact me if you need any additional information. Sincerely, Dennis J. Benoit, P.E. Senior Vice President /jlc P:\0482031\3 l\Corrcspondence\Veneklasen 012804.doc DATE: February 2, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030173 Address: 1263 W. Larch. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at 1263 W. Larch is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest responsible bidder. Case# & Project Address: # En-030173, 1263 W. Larch. Location and ownership: This structure is located on W. Larch between Ruddiman and McGraft. It is owned by Deutsche Bank Trust in Texas .. Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 11/20/03. A notice and order to repair was issued 12/3/03. On 1/8/04 the HBA declared the structure substandard and dangerous. Owner Contact: On 1/13/04 a contact for the bank called the Inspection office and stated the home is in foreclosure and they cannot do anything until the redemption period is up, which is 6 months. He was faxed all copies of previous notices. Financial Impact: General Funds Budget action required: None State Equalized value: $33,300 Estimated cost to repair: $8,000 plus the cost of interior repairs Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004. C:\WINDOWS\TEMPIAGENDA -1263 W. Larch.doc page I of I CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 1263 W. Larch 11/20/03 Inspection noted: 1. Garage - roof is collapsing. 2. Garage - Separation wall between house and garage is damaged. 3. Garage - electrical is incomplete. 4. Residence - Soffitt & fascia is damaged. 5. Residence - Front steps need repair. 6. Interior inspection with building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical inspectors required. 7. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to work beginning. Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\1263 W. Larch.doc CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT June 19, 2003 AT 4:26 p.m. FOR W. LARCH 1263 PAGE 1 No Cat Violation --- - - - ----------------------------------==-----=========---=======---== 1 B EXTERIOR Siding corners are missing. 2 B EXTERIOR Has peeling paint and is not protected from weather by properly applied water-resistant paint or waterproof finish. 3 B EXTERIOR Window has glazing that is missing or deteriorated. 4 B EXTERIOR Operable window(s) do not have a screen - must cover the complete bottom sash. 5 B EXTERIOR Window screen is torn or damaged. 6 B EXTERIOR Roof has some shingles or parts of shingles missing. 7 B EXTERIOR Foundation walls have missing mortar or open cracks. 8 B EXTERIOR Has eave boards that are rotted or missing. 9 B EXTERIOR - FRONT PORCH Steps have concrete or block walls on the sides that are deteriorated. 10 EXTERIOR - REAR DORMER Roof is totally deteriorated - must be replaced. 11 B EXTERIOR - REAR DORMER Side of the roof has rotted or missing roof boards. 12 A EXTERIOR - SEVERAL Window has broken or cracked glass. 13 B GARAGE Rafters are broken or rotted. 14 A GARAGE Rafters are collapsing. 15 B GARAGE Side of the roof has rotted or missing roof boards. 16 B GARAGE Overhead, sliding, or swing door is broken or missing parts so it may not work properly. 17 B GARAGE Wall between the house and garage doesn't have 1/2" drywall on the garage side of wall all the way to the roof. 18 B GARAGE Door is broken or missing. 19 A GARAGE Switch cover is missing or broken. 20 A GARAGE Outlet cover is missing or broken. 21 B GARAGE Has wires that are not stapled up. 22 B GARAGE Siding has holes in it or is rotted or missing. 23 GARAGE Has rotten wood at grade. CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT June 19, 2003 AT 4:26 p.m. FOR W. LARCH 1263 PAGE 2 No Cat Violation --- --- ------====-----===------=====---========-====================---- 24 GARAGE Coping is broken. 25 A GARAGE - ROOF Is full of large holes. 26 A GARAGE - SEVERAL Window has broken or cracked glass. END OF LIST AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this June 8 2004 by and between: Press's LLC (a corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of Michigan); (partnership consisting of _ _ _ _ _ _ _~; (an individual trading as _ __ ________ ); hereinafter called the "Contractor," and the City of Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter called the "City". WITNESSTH, that the Contractor and the City, for the consideration stated herein, mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. Statement of Work. The Contractor shall furnish all supervision, technical personnel, labor, materials, machinery, tools, equipment, and services, including utility and transportation services, and perform and complete all work required for the demolition and clearance of 1263 W. Larch as well as required supplemental work for the completion of this project, all in strict accordance with the Contract, including all Addenda. ARTICLE 2. Contract Price. The City will pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract and the completion of the work covered therein an amount not to exceed $3295. ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT: The executed contract shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following: Invitation for Bids Instructions to Bidders Bid Proposal Agreement General Specifications for Project Performance Equal Opportunity and Employment Specifications Demolition and Site Clearance Specifications This Agreement, together with other documents listed in Article 3, which said other documents are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached hereto or repeated herein, form the contract between the parties hereto. In the event any provision in any component part of this Contract conflicts with any provision of any other component part, the Contractor shall contact the City immediately in writing for a determination, interpretation, and/or classification of conflicting parts and priority of same. Said determination from the City shall be in writing and shall become an Addendum to this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed on the day and year first written above. ATTEST: CONTRACTOR: ATTEST: BY:, City Clerk (SEAL) CERTIFICATION (IF APPLICABLE) I, ---'1..24'--'!--",a'---','-""'----J----=S-:::.,...::'-':.:,}<coc'--'-'-·'_ _ _ , certify that I am the_,/_·;_12__c_.;:J _ _ _ _ _ __ of the Corporation named as contractor herein; That _TI~· ·_,_~_....,-----'~----·ccJ,_,...,..:::0c._~'-'·__,<:;...:'"-?,.,.:__··_, who signed this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor, was then_,,.,...L=.c..,;..-..<-"'···=•,"..:.•_·_ _ _ _ _ of said Corporation: That said Agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers. Signed: (CORPORATE SEAL) ,I)/;,/! r ,X"" ""'J "·' ' I /¾'CJ Printed Name and Title DATE: February 2, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030052 Address: 153 Houston. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at 153 Houston is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest responsible bidder. Case# & Project Address: #EN030052, 153 Houston, Muskegon, Ml Location and ownership: This structure is located on Houston between First and Jefferson and is owned by Ronald Wells. Staff Correspondence: This rental house began with a dangerous building inspection on the garage only on 5/29/03 and the residence was added on 10/7/03. An interior inspection was conducted on 10/22/03 and shortly after the house was listed for sale. Ronald Wells applied for a permit to repair the garage on 7/11/03, which expired before any repairs were done. There is also a housing inspection report with 75 violations. Owner Contact: There has been no contact since the interior inspection and the structure appears vacant now and for sale. Financial Impact: CDBG Funds Budget action required: None State Equalized value: $20,100 Estimated cost to repair: $30,000 Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\AGENDA ~153 Houston.doc page 1 of 1 \53 \-\.O u STOlv --------~-·- CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 153 Houston - Garage 5/29/03 Inspection noted: I. Roof severely damaged. 2. Exterior needs to be painted. 3. Footing/foundation inspection required. 4. Windows are boarded. 5. Fascia damaged. 6. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to work beginning. Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FAL TINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\153 Houston -G.doc CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 153 Houston 10/71/03 Inspection noted: 1. An interior inspection is required by all trade inspectors (plumbing, mechanical, electrical and building) before any permits or certificates of occupancy will be issued. 2. Fascia & soffitt damaged. Repair or replace. 3. Bilco-type door damaged/rotted. Repair or replace. 4. Siding repair required. 5. Improper deck rails. 6. Seventy-five violations of property maintenance code noted. (List is attached) 7. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to work beginning. Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. ROBERT B. GRABINSKI, DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS DATE C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\153 Houston-R.doc CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 153 Houston (INTERIOR INSPECTION) 10/22/03 Inspection noted: 1. House to be wired to meet 2000 MRC. 2. Service to be replaced to meet 2000 MRC. 3. Smoke alarms to be installed to meet 2000 MRC. 4. All work to be done with permits, by licensed electrical contractor. 5. Duct work needs to be replaced. 6. Waste & vent pipe needs to be replaced. 7. Non-approved water piping installed. 8. Severe structural damage to home, foundation and floor system. Floor joists cut, beams not properly bearing, incomplete support. Must meet MRC 2000 requirements for span, bearing. 9. Both sets of interior stairs are dangerous; non-conforming structural construction. Incomplete support of openings - trimmer rim and header - run and rise mising handrail and guardrail. I 0. Missing sections of ceiling covering and wall covering - and wall covering. Exposed insulation, water damage. Replace with new drywall to code. 11. Smoke alarms required to meet MRC 2000, hardwired, inter-connected with battery back up. 12. Provide rafter investigation - roof is caving in. 13. Fascia missing and falling off home. 14. Both porches are failing - rebuild to code. 15. Missing windows and screens. 16. Garage is in state of near collapse. Roof, siding, opening are all failing. 17. Chimney is collapsing on home. 18. Provide egress windows - one for each bedroom. 19. Replace all damaged wall and floor covering. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C :\WINDOWS\TEMP\ I 53 Houston-interior.doc No Ca': Vir:,lati:,n \ 53 -============-===---=--== --=========-----== 1 NOTE: Effective June 15, 1997 no certificates of compliance will be issued until all fees and debts to the City for that property have been paid in full. 2 NOTE: Code requires owners to notify City in writing within 10 days of transfering ownership. Notice must include name, address and phone number of new owner. 3 NOTE: Non owner-occupants must use licensed contractors for most electrical, plumbing or mechanical repair work. Call 724-6758 for more information. 4 B BASEMENT Has pendant light which is not approved. 5 B BASEMENT Has an open splice - must be in covered junction box. 6 B BASEMENT Has wires that are not stapled up. 7 A BASEMENT Has an extension cord that is creating a hazard. 8 b BASEMENT Fixture has an open terminal. 9 A BASEMENT Fuse box is not grounded. 10 B BASEMENT Light fixture is broken or loose. 11 B BASEMENT Stairway with 8 or more risers above ground is not bounded by intermediate rail between top rail and steps. 12 A BASEMENT Stairway with more than 4 risers does not have~ handrail on the open sides. 13 A BASEMENT Step is broken or rotted. 14 BASEMENT NOTE: Clean up knob and tube wiring. 15 B BATHROOM Vanity is broken or incomplete. 16 B BATHROOM Does not have a duplex receptacle - when installed it must be GFIC. 17 B BATHROOM Shower walls are irfcomplete. 18 B BATHROOM Ceiling tile are missing or falling down. 19 B BATHROOM Door hardware is broken, missing or incomplete. 20 B BATHROOM - LAVATORY Faucet is loose. 21 B BATHROOM - TUB Faucet is broken or incomplete. CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT May 16, 2003 AT 2:53 p.m. FOR HOUSTON 153 PAGE 2 No Cat Violation ---=== ============================================================-=--- 22 B BATHROOM - TUB Faucet is dripping. 23 B DINING ROOM Outlet is broken, loose or not working. 24 B DINING ROOM Ceiling tile are missing or falling down. 25 A EAST BEDROOM Window has broken or cracked glass. 26 B EAST BEDROOM Has trim that has holes in it or is rotted or missing. 27 A EAST BEDROOM Has open ended wire. 28 B EAST BEDROOM Room is not supplied with 2 sources of power. Must have 2 duplex wall outlets or outlet and one overhead light. 29 A EAST BEDROOM Switch cover is missing or broken. 30 B EAST BEDROOM Closet ceiling boards are loose. 31 B EAST BEDROOM Ceiling is unfinished. 32 B EAST BEDROOM Walls are unfinished. 33 B EAST ROOM Will not maintain 70 degrees at all times at 3 feet above the floor. 34 B EAST ROOM Paneling is buckled. 35 B EAST ROOM A Paneling has holes. 36 B EAST ROOM Room is not supplied with 2 sources of power. Must have 2 duplex wall outlets or outlet and one overhead light. 37 B EXTERIOR North steps have loose carpet 38 B EXTERIOR Window is closed off and the material used does not blend with the siding. 39 B EXTERIOR Chimney has loose or missing brick or mortar. 40 EXTERIOR NOTE: The condition of surfaces such as foundation, porches, steps, roof, etc. could not be determined due to snow cover. 41 B EXTERIOR - EAST Has peeling paint and is not protected from weather by properly appliec ater-resistant paint or w 3rproof finish. 42 B EXTERIOR - WEST Has eave boards that are rotted or missing. 43 B EXTERIOR - WEST ENTRANCE Does not have a proper light or sufficient light so as not to create a hazard. CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT May 16, 2003 AT 2:53 p.m. FOR HOUSTON 153 PAGE 3 No Cat Violation - - - --- ============================================================---== 44 B EXTERIOR - WEST FRONT Has missing siding. 45 B EXTERIOR - WEST FRONT West side front porch has missing siding. 46 B EXTERIOR - WEST PORCH Has missing ballisters. 47 GARAGE NOTE: Remove or repair properly. 48 B KITCHEN Door will not latch or shut. 49 B KITCHEN Cabinets are not in good repair. 50 B KITCHEN Floor covering has holes or tears. 51 A KITCHEN Light fixture is wired with unapproved wire. 52 B KITCHEN Has trim that has holes in it or is rotted or missing. 53 B KITCHEN Ceiling has peeling paint. 54 A KITCHEN Outlet has an electrical short. 55 A KITCHEN • Outlet cover is missing or broken. 56 A KITCHEN Has an extension cord that is creating a hazard. 57 B KITCHEN Baseboard is missing. 58 A LIVING ROOM Window has broken or cracked glass. 59 A MIDDLE ROOM Outlet cover is missing or broken. 60 B MIDDLE ROOM Floor covering has holes or tears. 61 B MIDDLE ROOM Trim is missing. 62 B MIDDLE ROOM Baseboard is missing. 63 B NORTHWEST BEDROOM Door hardware if roken, missing or incompl ". 64 B REAR PORCH Ceiling boards are loose. 65 B REAR PORCH Floor is spongy. 66 B SOUTHWEST BEDROOM Outlet is broken, loose or not working. 67 A SOUTHWEST BEDROOM Outlet cover is missing or broken. 68 B SOUTHWEST BEDROOM Door is broken or missing. 69 B UPPER HALLWAY CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT May 16, 2003 AT 2:53 p.m. FOR HOUSTON 153 PAGE 4 No Cat Violation --- --- ============================================================----- Has pendant light which is not approved. 70 B UPPER HALLWAY Floor covering has holes, rips or is missing or is not sealed on edges. 71 A UPPER STAIRS Handrail is missing. 72 B WEST BEDROOM Ceiling is water damaged. 73 B WEST BEDROOM Wall or walls has a hole or holes or large cracks in it. 74 B WEST BEDROOM Floor covering has holes or tears. 75 B WEST BEDROOM Ceiling panels are falling. END OF LIST AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this June 8 2004 by and between: Press's LLC (a corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of Michigan); (partnership consisting of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ); (an individual trading as _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __/; hereinafter called the "Contractor," and the City of Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter called the "City". ' WITNESSTH, that the Contractor and the City, for the consideration stated herein, mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. Statement of Work. The Contractor shall furnish all supervision, technical personnel, labor, materials, machinery, tools, equipment, and services, including utility and transportation services, and perform and complete all work required for the demolition and clearance of 153 Houston as well as required supplemental work for the completion of this project, all in strict accordance with the Contract, including all Addenda. ARTICLE 2. Contract Price. The City will pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract and the completion of the work covered therein an amount not to exceed $3795. ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT:· The executed contract shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following: Invitation for Bids Instructions to Bidders Bid Proposal Agreement General Specifications for Project Performance Equal Opportunity and Employment Specifications Demolition and Site Clearance Specifications This Agreement, together with other documents listed in Article 3, which said other documents are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached hereto or repeated herein, form the contract between the parties hereto. In the event any provision in any component part of this Contract conflicts with any provision of any other component part, the Contractor shall contact the City immediately in writing for a determination, interpretation, and/or classification of conflicting parts and priority of same. Said determination from the City shall be in writing and shall become an Addendum to this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed on the day and year first written above. ATTEST CONTRACTOR: BY: ;Jj-t,11,,,f ~f·1,-~(Jf /o<Jvi£ ( J ' Printed name and ~ . ATTEST: (SEAL) CERTIFICATION (IF APPLICABLE) I, ; ] l(l J' \o g.ef , certify that I am the \?"\ "- "':; d,,rri of the Corporation named as contractor herein; , who signed this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor, was then-""C2,G"'·_,,r""'"''-"''--------- of said Corporation: That said Agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers. Signed: 'fJ{)~< .-&9•( 7 ' (CORPORATE SEAL) . '" ' l':\y, ~·~r '"' I •;;Q r?,-es Printed Name and Title DATE: February 2, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030172 Address: 1867 Austin. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at 1867 Austin is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest responsible bidder. Case# & Project Address: #EN030172, 1867 Austin, Muskegon, Ml Location and ownership: This structure is located on Austin between Laketon and Holbrook. It is owned by John Joseph. Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 11 /20/03. A notice and order to repair was issued 12/2/03. On 1/8/04 Chris Davison appeared before the HBA and stated he was buying the property on a Land Contract from George Puthuppally, who is the same person as John Joseph. He was told if he intends to save the house he needs to bring in prove that he has a financial interest in the property and schedule an interior inspection. When asked about completing repairs he stated he needs to wait until he gets an income tax refund to pay for any repairs. The HBA declared the house substandard on that date. Owner Contact: On 2/2/04 Chris Davison called the Inspection office and tried to schedule an interior inspection. He was told we first need proof that he has a financial interest in the property and if he could bring in his paperwork today we can schedule an inspection to be conducted within a couple days. Financial Impact: General Funds Budget action required: None State Equalized value: $15,300 Estimated cost to repair: $2,500 plus the cost of interior repairs Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004. - CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 1867 Austin (SHED) 4/16/03 Inspection noted: 1. Shed is in state of structural collapse. Rebuild to Michigan Residential Code 2000 or remove structure. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\1867 Austin -G.doc CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 1867 Austin 11/20/03 Inspection noted: 1. Windows broken & boarded. 2. Entry door panels broken and/or missing. 3. Face brick broken and/or missing. 4. Debris in yard. 5. Owner is not responding to repair notices. 6. Interior inspection with building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical inspectors required. 7. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to work beginning. Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\WINDOWSITEMP\1867 Austin.doc AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this July 13, 2004 by and between: Press's LLC (a corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of Michigan); (partnership consisting of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ); (an individual trading as _ __ ________ ); hereinafter called the "Contractor," and the City of Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter called the "City". WITNESSTH, that the Contractor and the City, for the consideration stated herein, mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. Statement of Work. The Contractor shall furnish all supervision, technical personnel, labor, materials, machinery, tools, equipment, and services, including utility and transportation services, and perform and complete all work required for the demolition and clearance of 1867 Austin as well as required supplemental work for the completion of this project, all in strict accordance with the Contract, including all Addenda. ARTICLE 2. Contract Price. The City will pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract and the completion of the work covered therein an amount not to exceed $2895 ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT: The executed contract shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following: Invitation for Bids Instructions to Bidders Bid Proposal Agreement General Specifications for Project Performance Equal Opportunity and Employment Specifications Demolition and Site Clearance Specifications This Agreement, together with other documents listed in Article 3, which said other documents are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached hereto or repeated herein, form the contract between the parties hereto. In the event any provision in any component part of this Contract conflicts with any provision of any other component part, the Contractor shall contact the City immediately in writing for a determination, interpretation, and/or classification of conflicting parts and priority of same. Said determination from the City shall be in writing and shall become an Addendum to this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed on the day and year first written above. ATTEST: CONTRACTOR: BY: f~\ 1-\o ':;y,_~L' - \',es Printed nameind title ATTEST: ~&&z City Clerk (SEAL) CERTIFICATION (IF APPLICABLE) , certify that I am the tc--0=1''-'u"".""w'-"e""s:_ _ _ _ __ of the Corporation named as contractor herein; That µ \4 0 ~Dbo~ I:' , who signed this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor, was then,_Q¥----"-§::-"'\/.-"'"4'---------- of said Corporation: That said Agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers. (CORPORATE SEAL) DATE: February 2, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: EN-030040 Address: 1947 S. Getty. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at 1947 S. Getty is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest responsible bidder. Case# & Project Address: #EN030040, 1947 S. Getty, Muskegon, Ml Location and ownership: This commercial structure is located on South Getty between Laketon and Hackley and is owned by the State of Michigan. Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 5/29/03 and the notice and order to repair or remove was issued 6/13/03. On 8/7/03 the HBA declared the structure dangerous and substandard. Owner Contact: There has been no contact from the State. Financial Impact: General Funds Budget action required: None State Equalized value: $75,700 - Commercial building and garage Estimated cost to repair: $8,000 Exterior only Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004. C:\WINDOWS\TEMPIAGENDA -1947 S. Gclly.doc page I of I • --- ----·--. ~.' CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 1947 S. GETTY 5/29/03 Inspection noted: 1. Exterior need to be painted and repaired. 2. No utilities. 3. Soffitt damaged and must be repaired. 4. Window trim rotted. 5. Roof inspection required. 6. Garage siding needs repair and paint. 7. Garage windows broken - repair or replace. 8. Garage roof deteriorated. 9. Fence in rear yard is damaged. 10. Interior inspection with building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical inspectors required. 11. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to work beginning. Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HA VE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\1947 S. Getty.doc DATE: February 2, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030042 Address: 1345 Fifth - Garage only. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at 1345 Fifth- Garage is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest responsible bidder. Case# & Project Address: # En-030042 Address: 1345 Fifth - Garage only. Location and ownership: This structure is located on Fifth Street between Mason & Strong and is owned by Fannie Jones, Chicago Heights, Illinois. Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 5/9/03. A notice and order to repair was issued 6/12/03. On 8/7/03 the HBA declared the garage substandard and dangerous. Owner Contact: On 7/10/03 a relative of the owner came into the Inspection office and requested an extension on behalf of the owner who lives in Illinois. He stated the property is being sold. An extension was not granted. On 8/13/03 a potential buyer of the property came into the Inspection office and stated she would like to repair the garage after purchasing the property. There has been no contact since that date. Financial Impact: CDBG Funds Budget action required: None State Equalized value: $17,800 (house & garage) Estimated cost to repair: $1,500 Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004. C:\WINDOWSITEMP\AGENDA -1345 Fifth· G.doc page I of I \3\\S ---- .-· CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 1345 Fifth - Garage 5/29/03 Inspection noted: 1. Roof is partially collapsed and destroyed. 2. Exterior walls are unprotected. 3. Footing/foundation inspection required. 4. Door is damage. 5. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to work beginning. Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRYFALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\1345 5th -G.doc DATE: February 2, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030094 Address: 1986 Ninth - Garage only. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at 1986 Ninth- Garage is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest responsible bidder. Case# & Project Address: # En-030094 Address: 1986 Ninth - Garage only. Location and ownership: This structure is located on Ninth Street between Delano and Young and is owned by David Ross. Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 4/16/03. A notice and order to repair was issued 5/12/03. Mr. Ross applied for a permit to demolish the garage on 6/11/03, but never demolished it. On 11/6/03 the HBA declared the garage substandard and dangerous. Owner Contact: Mr. Ross came in the Inspection office to apply for a demolition permit. On 9/18/03 a letter was sent to him requesting him to contact the office again with his intentions. He did not reply. Financial Impact: General Funds Budget action required: None State Equalized value: $15,500 (house & garage) Estimated cost to repair: $2,500 Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004. C:\WINDOWS\TEMPIAGENDA -1986 Ninth - G.doc page J of] CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 1986 Ninth (GARAGE) 4/16/03 Inspection noted: 1. Garage roof has partially collapsed. All structural roof system has deteriorated. 2. Structural wall cracks - interior investigation of garage is required to access damage. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FALTINOWSK.I, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\1986 Ninth-G.doc AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this June 8, 2004 by and between: Franklin Contractors (a corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of Michigan); (partnership consisting of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ); (an individual trading as _ __ ________ ); hereinafter called the "Contractor," and the City of Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter called the "City". WITNESSTH, that the Contractor and the City, for the consideration stated herein, mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. Statement of Work. The Contractor shall furnish all supervision, technical personnel, labor, materials, machinery, tools, equipment, and services, including utility and transportation services, and perform and complete all work required for the demolition and clearance of 1986 Ninth-Garage as well as required supplemental work for the completion of this project, all in strict accordance with the Contract, including all Addenda. ARTICLE 2. Contract Price. The City will pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract and the completion of the work covered therein an amount not to exceed $995. ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT: The executed contract shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following: Invitation for Bids Instructions to Bidders Bid Proposal Agreement General Specifications for Project Performance Equal Opportunity and Employment Specifications Demolition and Site Clearance Specifications This Agreement, together with other documents listed in Article 3, which said other documents are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached hereto or repeated herein, form the contract between the parties hereto. In the event any provision in any component part of this Contract conflicts with any provision of any other component part, the Contractor shall contact the City immediately in writing for a determination, interpretation, and/or classification of conflicting parts and priority of same. Said determination from the City shall be in writing and shall become an Addendum to this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed on the day and year first written above. ATTEST: CONTRACTOR: BY :t[f3/jl3-;() /2. f'/21/:JJ/!/..liV//JJJEst/:Jp,d( 1 Printed name and title -, ATTEST CITY OF MUSKEGC)JN1, )/ '\ ~@ ~ By .. c-, ... . ' ''----\' l-,•-t . ... ·. . -·. / ', ;· .' /,. , City Clerk ( (SEAL) CERTIFICATION (IF APPLICABLE) I, ?m)tf<)/;.fRJ?.JJKI...M,) , certify that I am thef}f?.t!ELtJWC" of the Corporation named as contractor herein; That _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , who signed this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor, was then, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ of said Corporation: That said Agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers. Signed: )Ja,£~.FJ (CORPORATE SEAL) ~-fevf5A) Printed Name and Title e.. [MJ,£1-.IU I PfK. - DATE: February 2, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case #: EN-030029 Address: 448 Catherine. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at 448 Catherine - Area 11 is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest responsible bidder. Case# & Project Address: #EN030029, 448 Catherine, Muskegon, Ml Location and ownership: This structure is located on Catherine between Williams and Wood St. It is owned by Curtis Vines who lives at 1868 Mclllwraith. Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 3/5/03 because the structure had been boarded and vacant for more than 180 days. A notice and order to repair was issued 3/5/03. An interior inspection was conducted with the owner on 4/18/03. On 7/3/03 the HBA tabled the case for 60 days to allow the owner time to have an electrical contractor pull a permit and complete the required repairs. Billy Walker Jr. applied for the electrical permit on 7/25/03 and called on 11/6/03 (date of HBA review) to schedule an inspection. The electrical inspector went to the property and found the electricity had been hooked up illegally. The HBA declared the structure on that date. Owner Contact: Mr. Vines was in contact with Inspection Services to schedule an interior inspection and he stated he wanted to fix the house and live in it. He stated he would not be renting the structure out. There has been no contact since 11/6/03. Financial Impact: CDBG Funds Budget action required: None State Equalized value: $20,200 Estimated cost to repair: $6,000 Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish. City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004. CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 448 Catherine 3/5/03 Inspection noted: I. Home has been boarded more than 180 days. 2. Foundation needs tuck pointing. 3. Interior inspection is required by all trade inspectors (plumbing, mechanical, electrical and building) before any permits or certificates of occupancy will be issued. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\448 Catherine.doc CITY OF MUSKEGON DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT 448 Catherine 4/18/03 (INTERIOR INSPECTION) Inspection noted: I. Tuck point block. 2. Repair wall and ceiling damage - upper apt. 3. Repair floor damage and decking. 4. Minor duct repair. 5. Service needs replacing. 6. Furnace is improperly wired. 7. Open J boxes. 8. Water systems not bonded. 9. Exposed knob & tube wiring. 10. Romex fittings missing in boxes. 11. Smoke detectors required -hard wired w/battery back up. 12. Remove all open splices. 13. Dining room light improperly installed. 14. Paddle fan improperly installed. 15. 3 wire outlets not grounded. I 6. Bathroom outlet not on 20 amp circuit. 17. Upper: 3 wire outlets not grounded. Paddle fans improperly installed. Bathroom outlet not on 20 amp circuit. 18. Exterior lights missing. 19. Smoke detectors required - hard wired w/battery back up. 20. Service needs to be replaced. 21. Replace miscellaneous switch and outlet covers. BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE. HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\448 Catherine-Interior.doc
Sign up for City of Muskegon Emails