View the PDF version Google Docs PDF Viewer
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
FEBRUARY 10, 2004
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS@ 5:30 P.M.
AGENDA
o CALL TO ORDER:
o PRAYER:
o PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
o ROLL CALL:
o HONORS AND AWARDS:
o INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATION
o CONSENT AGENDA:
a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK
b. Policy Regarding Conflict of Interest and Service Pledge. CITY CLERK
c. FIRST READING: Amend Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances
Adopting the 2003 International Fire Code. INSPECTION SERVICES/FIRE
d. Consumers Energy Easement. LEISURE SERVICES
e. Janitorial Services. Option Year (2004-2005). ENGINEERING
f. Traffic Department Materials and Services 2004. PUBLIC WORKS
g. Write-off of Uncollectible Accounts Receivable. CITY TREASURER
o PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Request for the Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
Streamline Tooling Systems. Inc. PLANNING & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
b. DNR Grant Application Re-submittal. LEISURE SERVICES
c. Create Special Assessment District for Beidler Street. Laketon to
Southern Avenue. ENGINEERING
d. Create Special Assessment District for McCracken Street. Sherman Blvd
to Lakeshore Drive. ENGINEERING
e. Create Special Assessment District for Sherman Blvd .• Lincoln Street to
Beach Street. ENGINEERING
□ COMMUNICATIONS:
□ CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
□ UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
a. SECOND READING: Rezoning Request for Property Located at 407
Marquette Aveneu {SE Corner of Marquette Avenue and Wood Street).
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
□ NEW BUSINESS:
a. City - MDOT Agreement for Sherman Blvd., Lincoln to Beach.
ENGINEERING
b. Milwaukee Clipper Request. LEISURE SERVICES
c. Mall Study Committee Final Report. PLANNING & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
d. Agreement with the DMDC. CITY MANAGER
e. Final Amendments to 2003 Budget. FINANCE
f. Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvements Project. WATER
FILTRATION
g. Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Nofice and Order to
Demolish the Following: INSPECTION SERVICES
1. 1263 W. Larch
2. 153 Houston - Area 10
3. 1867 Austin
4. 1947 S. Getty
5. 448 Catherine -Area 11
6. 1345 Fifth - Garage Only - Area l 0
7. 1986 Ninth - Garage Only
□ ANY OTHER BUSINESS:
o PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
► Reminder: Individuals who would like to address the City Commission shall do the following;
► Fill out CJ request to speak form ottached to the agenda or located in the back of the room.
► Submit !he form to the City Clerk.
► Be recognized by the Chair.
► Step forward to the microphone.
► State name and address.
► limit of 3 minutes to address the Commission.
► (Speaker representing a group moy be allowed 10 minutes if previously registered with City Clerk.)
o ADJOURNMENT:
ADA POLICY: THE CITY OF MUSKEGON WILL PROVIDE NECESSARY AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS WHO
WANT TO ATTEND THE MEETING UPON TWENTY FOUR HOUR NOTICE TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGON. PLEASE CONTACT GAIL A.
KUNDINGER, CITY CLERK, 933 TERRACE STREET, MUSKEGON, Ml 49440 OR BY CALLING (231) 724-6705 OR TDD: (231)
724-4172.
Date: February 10, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
RE: Approval of Minutes
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the minutes of the Special
Commission Meeting that was held on Wednesday, January 21, 2004;
and the Regular Commission Meeting that was held on Tuesday,
January 27, 2004.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the minutes.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
FEBRUARY 10, 2004
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS@ 5:30 P.M.
MINUTES
The Regular Commission Meeting of the City of Muskegon was held at City
Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan at 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, February 10,
2004.
Mayor Warmington opened the meeting with a prayer from Pastor Sarah
Johnson of the Word of Truth Outreach after which the Commission and Public
recited the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL FOR THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING:
Present: Mayor Stephen Warmington, Vice Mayor Bill Larson, Commissioners
Chris Carter, Kevin Davis, Stephen Gawron, Clara Shepherd, and Lawrence
Spataro, City Manager Bryon Mazade, City Attorney John Schrier and City Clerk
Gail Kundinger.
2004- 17 CONSENT AGENDA:
a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the minutes of the Special Commission
Meeting that was held on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 and the Regular
Commission Meeting that was held on Tuesday, January 27, 2004.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the minutes.
b. Policy Regarding Conflict of Interest and Service Pledge. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt a resolution that requires all appointed
members of the various City boards and committees to sign a Conflict of Interest
form and a Service Pledge form.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: approval
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Legislative Policy Committee met on
January 28, 2004 and recommends approval.
c. FIRST READING: Amend Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances
Adopting the 2003 International Fire Code. INSPECTION SERVICES/FIRE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: .This is to request City Commission adopt the ordinance
amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances. This request is made to
adopt the 2003 International Fire Code and retain appendix 11-C of the 1997
Uniform Fire Code.
The request to adopt the 2003 edition is made to put the Fire Code in line with
the current editions of the construction codes as adopted by the State of
Michigan. Retainage of the appendix 11-C will allow some code enforcement for
fire safety on marina docks.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. All code books were budgeted for in anticipation of
this change.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the ordinance as written.
d. Consumers Energy Easement. LEISURE SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Consumers Energy is requesting an easement across the
bike trail property at Edison Landing to Service the CSX railroad crossing.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve
e. Janitorial Services, Option Year (2004-2005). ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Exercise the "option year" in the City's 2001-2003
contract with Edwards Janitorial to clean City Hall and the Public Service
Building for an additional monthly charge of $151.62 for City Hall and $50.79 for
DPW. The total annual cost for this option year is $56,520 for City hall, which is
$367.85 more than what was submitted as part of the bids for option year back
in February of 2001. Similarly, the proposed annual DPW charges are $17,400
which is $121.35 more than 2001 bids for an option year.
These extra charges are being requested by Edwards due to a significant
increase in his workman compensation.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The total cost of the contract which is $73,920.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. The option year cost was anticipated during
the budget time and the extras are minor.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the extension of the contract with
Edwards Janitorial to provide cleaning services until the end of April of 2005.
f. Traffic Department Materials and Services 2004. PUBLIC WORKS
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Contract with the Muskegon County Road Commission
for the joint purchase of various Traffic Department materials and services. We
have bid out these items with MCRC for the past fourteen years. By bidding
together with MCRC and other municipalities we are able to get better unit
prices because of larger quantity purchases.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Sign materials and services to be jointly bid:
Sign blanks .............................................. .$1,500.00 approx.
Sign posts ................................................ .$4,800.00 approx.
Sign sheeting ...........................................$1,500.00 approx.
Ready made signs .................................. $2,000.00 approx.
Centerline painting .............................. $12,000.00 approx.
Total $21,800.00 ($21,2000.00 in 2003)
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. This item is requested each year in the
appropriate Highway budgets.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the continued joint purchasing with the
Muskegon County Road Commission for sign materials and services.
g. Write-off of Uncollectible Accounts Receivable. CITY TREASURER
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Periodically, it is necessary to purge from the City's
general accounts receivable records items that are deemed uncollectible. In
most cases these items have gone through the entire collection process without
success. In some other cases, further collection efforts, such as using the outside
collection agency, resulted in limited success. However, at this time, it is
requested that the City Commisison authorize staff to write-off these receivables
from the City's books.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Reduce the City's accounts receivable by $16,304.90. The
impact would be a decrease in the fund balance/retained earnings of several
City funds as follows.
101 General Fund $ 7,068.87
472 CDBG Fund 5,681.30
590 & 591 Sewer Fund & Water Fund 3,554.73
Total $16.304.90
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: For the General, Sewer and Water Funds, there are
sufficient funds for bad debt expense included in the 2003 budget, so no further
action is required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the 2003 write-offs effective for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003 for the various funds as shown above.
Motion by Commissioner Gawron, second by Commissioner Spataro to approve
the Consent Agenda as read.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro,
Warmington
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
2004-18 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Request for the Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
Streamline Tooling Systems. Inc. PLANNING & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Pursuant to Public Act 198 of 1974 as amended,
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan,
has requested the establishment of an Industrial Development District for
property located at 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the resolution establishing the Industrial
Development District for Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
The Public Hearing opened at 5:39pm to hear comments from the public. There
were no comments heard at this time.
Motion by Commissioner Gawron, second by Commissioner Carter to close the
Public Hearing at 5:41 pm and to approve the resolution establishing the
Industrial Development District for Streamline Tooling Systems. Inc.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington,
Carter
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
b. DNR Grant Application Re-submittal. LEISURE SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To authorize staff to re-submit grant applications to the
DNR Trust Fund for the purchase of the Consumers Energy Property and to
construct Phase I of the Lakeshore Trail. We have applied for these grants each
of the last two years.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consumers Energy Purchase - None
Lakeshore Trail Construction - $425,000
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve
The Public Hearing opened at 5:42pm to hear comments from the public. There
were no comments heard at this time.
Motion by Commissioner Larson, second by Commissioner Davis to close the
Public Hearing at 5:46pm to authorize staff to re-submit applications to the DNR
Trust Fund for the purchase of the Consumers Energy Property and to construct
Phase 1 of the Lakeshore Trail.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter,
Davis
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
c. Create Special Assessment District for Beidler Street. Laketon to
Southern Avenue. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special
assessment of Beidler St., Laketon to Southern Ave., and to create the special
assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors
if it is determined to proceed with the project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City
Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution.
The Public Hearing opened at 5:47pm to hear comments from the public.
Comments in opposition were heard by David Wotli of 1724 Beidler. Dale Sisson
of 1607 Beidler, Debbie Anderson of 1730 Beidler and Marion Olearchek from
the Nelson Community Association at 1608 Beidler.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Gawron to close the
Public Hearing at 6:03pm and to approve the special assessment district of
Beidler St., Laketon to Southern Ave., and assign two Commissioners to the Board
of Assessors by adopting the resolution.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Gawron
Nays: Larson, Shepherd, Warmington, Carter, Davis
MOTION FAILS
d. Create Special Assessment District for McCracken Street. Sherman Blvd
to Lakeshore Drive. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special
assessment of McCracken St., Sherman Blvd. To Lakeshore Drive., and to create
the special assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board
of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City
Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution.
The Public Hearing opened at 6:08pm to hear comments from the public.
Comments in opposition were heard from Dan and Julie Jolman of 2075 Miner
and 2223 McCracken, Walter White of 2326 Greenwood, Dave Flickema of 2493
McCracken, Rosemary Kowalski of 2101 Moon and 2272 McCracken, Paul
Kurdziel of 2319 Greenwood, Norm Cunningham of 3151 Beach who
represented Steve Holdeman of 2011 Letart and Mrs. Hansen. In favor was Ray
Theile of 2465 McCracken.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Vice Mayor Larson to close the
Public Hearing at 6:46pm and to approve the special assessment district of
McCracken St., Sherman Blvd. To Lakeshore Dr. and to assign Vice Mayor Larson
and Commissioner Davis to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Larson,
Gawron
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
e. Create Special Assessment District for Sherman Blvd .• Lincoln Street to
Beach Street. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold a public hearing on the proposed special
assessment of Sherman Blvd., Lincoln Street to Beach St., and to create the
special assessment district and appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of
Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To create the special assessment and assign two City
Commissioners to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution.
The Public Hearing opened at 6:51 pm to hear comments from the public.
Comments in opposition were heard from Wendell Hallman of 2500 Sherman,
Chad Murphy of 2596 Sherman, Jim Harker of 2432 Sherman and Jim Shields of
2586 Fountain who also read a letter from Melvin Onstott of 2442 Sherman who
was also in opposition.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second Vice Mayor Larson to close the Public
Hearing at 7:22pm and approve the special assessment district of Sherman Blvd.,
Lincoln St. to Beach St. and appoint Vice Mayor Larson and Commissioner Davis
to the Board of Assessors by adopting the resolution.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson,
Shepherd
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
2004-19 UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
a. SECOND READING: Rezoning Request for Property Located at 407
Marquette Avenue (SE Corner of Marquette Avenue and Wood Street).
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request to rezone property located at 407 Marquette
Ave., at the SE corner of Marquette Ave. and Wood St., from R-1, Single-Family
Residential to B-1, Limited Business.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the request due to lack
of compliance with the future land use map and Master Land Use Plan.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted to deny the
request at their 1/15 meeting. Spataro, Aslakson, Johnson and Sartorius voted for
denial, Michalski and Smith voted against denial, and Mazade and Warmington
abstained. T. Harryman was absent.
Motion by Vice Mayor Larson, second by Commissioner Davis to approve the
rezoning of 407 Marquette Ave, from R-1 Single-Family Residential to B-1, Limited
Business.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Davis, Larson
Nays: Warmington, Carter, Gawron, Shepherd, Spataro
MOTION FAILS
2004-20 NEW BUSINESS:
a. City - MDOT Agreement for Sherman Blvd., Lincoln to Beach.
ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the contract with MDOT for the
reconstruction of Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln to Beach Street and to approve
the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: MDOT's participation is estimated at $355,830 but not to
exceed 81.85% of eligible cost. The estimated total cost of the project, including
the none participating items of engineering and watermain, is $550,000.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. The City's share of the cost will
come out of the Major Street and Water Funds as was budgeted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the agreement and resolution be approved.
Motion by Vice Mayor Larson, second by Commissioner Gawron to approve the
contract with MDOT for the reconstruction of Sherman Blvd., from Lincoln to
Beach St. and to approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to
sign the contract.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro,
Warmington
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
b. Mall Study Committee Final Report. PLANNING & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Study Committee, which was appointed by the City
Commission on April 22, 2003 to study the historic significance of the mall
structures has developed a final report. The five buildings researched are
commonly known as the Russell Block (Daniels), Century Club, Muskegon Savings
Bank, Montgomery Block (National City Bank), and the Hackley Bank Building
(Comerica). To finalize its duties, the Study Committee is forwarding on the final
report with a recommendation to the City Commission.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To accept the Study Committee report and
recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Study Committee recommended to the
City Commission that the compromise of placing the demolition permits for the
four buildings in question be placed in escrow so they cannot be demolished
until we have final site plans and the closing on the property.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Gawron to accept
the Mall Study Committee report and recommendation
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington,
Carter
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
c. Agreement with the DMDC. CITY MANAGER
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve an agreement with the DMDC regarding the
demolition of the buildings with the former Muskegon Mall.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the agreement.
Motion by Commissioner Carter, second by Commissioner Davis to approve an
agreement with the Downtown Muskegon Development Corporation regarding
the demolition of the buildings associated with the former Muskegon Mall.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter,
Davis
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
d. Final Amendments to 2003 Budget. FINANCE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Adoption of the year-end amendments to the City's
2003 Budget to assure compliance with the State Uniform Budget Act. This act
requires that budgets for "governmental-type" funds (i.e. general fund and
special revenue funds) be amended so that expenditures are not reported in
the City's audit as exceeding legal appropriations.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: These budget amendments establish the final 2003
authorized revenue estimates and spending limits for the various City
Departments and funds. The schedule shows how the amended budget varies
from the original budget (and subsequent budget reforecasts) previously
approved by the City Commission.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: Self-explanatory
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Shepherd to
approve the adoption of the year-end amendments to the City's 2003 Budget.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Gawron
Nays: None
Davis was out of the room.
MOTION PASSES
e. Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvements Project. WATER
FILTRATION
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To enlist Muskegon Construction Company to perform
the Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvement project at the Water
Filtration Plant.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: $256,800.00.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: The project cost will be funded with Drinking Water
Revolving Loan Fund (DWRF) money.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend making a change to the Water
Filtration Plant Improvements project contract with Muskegon Construction
Company, to perform the Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvement
project at an additional cost of $256,800.00.
Motion by Commissioner Carter, second by Commissioner Spataro to make a
change to the Water Filtration Plant Improvements project contract with
Muskegon Construction to perform the Laboratory and Employee Facilities
Improvement project at an additional cost of $256,800.00.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron,
Larson
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
f. Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to
Demolish the Following: INSPECTION SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request the City Commission concur with the
Housing Board of Appeals that the structures located at the following addresses
are unsafe, substandard, public nuisances and that they be demolished within
thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to obtain
bids for the demolition of the structures and that the Mayor and City Clerk be
authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition at the lowest
responsible bidder.
1. 1263 W. Larch
CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #En-030173, 1263 W. Larch
LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on W. Larch between
Ruddiman and McGraft. It is owned by Deutsche Bank Trust in Texas.
STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
11 /20/03. A Notice and Order to repair was issued on 12/3/03. On 1/8/04 the
HBA declared the structure substandard and dangerous.
OWNER CONTACT: On 1/13/04 a contact for the bank called the Inspection
office and stated the home is in foreclosure and they cannot do anything until
the redemption period is up, which is 6 months. He was faxed all copies of
previous notices.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $33,300
ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $8,000 plus the cost of interior repairs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals
decision to demolish.
2. 153 Houston St.
CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN030052, 153 Houston, Muskegon, Ml
LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on Houston between First
and Jefferson and is owned by Ronald Wells.
STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: This rental house began with a dangerous building
inspection on the garage only on 5/29/03 and the residence was added on
10/07/03. An interior inspection was conducted on 10/22/03 and shortly after
the house was listed for sale. Ronald Wells applied for a permit to repair the
garage on 7/11 /03, which expired before any repairs were done. There is also a
housing inspection report with 75 violations.
OWNER CONTACT: There has been no contact since the interior inspection and
the structure appears vacant now and for sale.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: CDBG
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
ST ATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $20,100
ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $30,000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals
decision to demolish.
3. 1867 Austin
CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN030172, 1867 Austin, Muskegon, Ml
LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on Austin, between
Laketon and Holbrook. It is owned by John Joseph.
STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
11 /20/03. A Notice and Order to Repair was issued 12/2/03. On 1/8/04 Chris
Davison appeared before the HBA and stated he was buying the property on a
Land Contract from George Puthupppally, who is the same person as John
Joseph. He was told if he intends to save the house he needs to bring in prove
that he has a financial interest in the property and schedule an interior
inspection. When asked about completing repairs, he stated he needs to wait
until he gets an income tax refund to pay for any repairs. The HBA declared the
house substandard on that date.
OWNER CONTACT: On 2/2/04 Chris Davison called the Inspection office and
tried to schedule an interior inspection. He was told we first need proof that he
has a financial interest in the property and if he could bring in his paperwork
today we can schedule an inspection to be conducted within a couple days.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $15,300
ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $2,500 plus the cost of interior repairs
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals
decision to demolish.
4. 1947 S. Getty
CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN030040, 1947 S. Getty, Muskegon, Ml
LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This commercial structure is located on S. Getty
between Laketon and Hackley and is owned by the State of Michigan.
STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
5/29/03 and the Notice and Order to repair or remove was issued 6/13/03. On
8/7 /03 the HBA declared the structure dangerous and substandard.
OWNER CONTACT: There has been no contact from the State.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $75,700 - Commercial building and garage
ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $8,000 Exterior only
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals
decision to demolish.
5. 1345 Fifth - Garage Only
CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN-030042 Address: 1345 Fifth - Garage only
LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on Fifth St., between Mason
& Strong and is owned by Fannie Jones, Chicago Heights, Illinois.
STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
5/9/03. A notice and Order to repair was issued 6/12/03. On 8/7/03 the HBA
declared the garage substandard and dangerous.
OWNER CONTACT: On 7/10/03 a relative of the owner came into the Inspection
office and requested an extension on behalf of the owner who lives in Illinois. He
stated the property is being sold. An extension was not granted. On 8/13/03 a
potential buyer of the property came into the Inspection office and stated she
would like to repair the garage after purchasing the property. There has been
no contact since that date.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $17,800 (house and garage)
ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $1,500
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals
decision to demolish.
6. 1986 Ninth - Garage Only
CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN-030094 Address: 1986 Ninth - Garage only
LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on ninth Street between
Delon and Young and is owned by David Ross.
STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
4/16/03. A Notice and Order to repair was issued 5/12/03. Mr. Ross applied for a
permit to demolish the garage on 6/11 /03, but never demolished it. On
11 /06/03 the HBA declared the garage substandard and dangerous.
OWNER CONTACT: Mr. Ross came in the Inspection office to apply for a
demolition permit. On 9/18/03 a letter was sent to him requesting him to
contact the office again with his intentions. He did not reply.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Funds
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $15,500 (house and garage)
ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $2,500
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals
decision to demolish.
Motion by Commissioner Shepherd, second by Vice Mayor Larson to concur
with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish 1263 W. Larch, 153
Houston, 1867 Austin, 1947 S. Getty, 1345 Fifth (Garage Only) and 1986 Ninth
(Garage only); and direct staff to obtain bids for the demolition of the structures;
and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a
contract for demolitions at the lowest responsible bidder.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd
Nays: Davis
MOTION PASSES
7. 448 Catherine
CASE# & PROJECT ADDRESS: #EN030029, 448 Catherine, Muskegon, Ml
LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP: This structure is located on Catherine between
Williams and Wood St. It is owned by Curtis Vines who lives at 1868 Mcilwraith.
STAFF CORRESPONDENCE: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
3/5/03 because the structure had been boarded and vacant for more than 180
days. A Notice and Order to repair was issued 3/5/03. An interior inspection was
conducted with the owner on 4/18/03. On 7/3/03 the HBA tabled the case for
60 days to allow the owner time to have an electrical contractor pull a permit
and complete the required repairs. Billy Walker Jr. applied for the electrical
permit on 7/25/03 and called on 11/06/03 (date of HBA review) to schedule an
inspection. The electrical inspector went to the property and found the
electricity had been hooked up illegally. The HBA declared the structure on that
date.
OWNER CONTACT: Mr. Vines was in contact with Inspection Services to schedule
an interior inspection and he stated he wanted to fix the house and live in it. He
stated he would not be renting the structure out. There has been no contact
since 11 /06/03.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: CDBG Funds
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STATE EQUALIZED VALUE: $20,200
ESTIMATED COST TO REPAIR: $6,000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals
decision to demolish.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Shepherd to concur
with the Housing Board of Appeals to demolish 448 Catherine and to authorize
staff to obtain bids for the demolition and that the Mayor and City Clerk be
authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition at the lowest
responsible bidder.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd,
Spataro
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
The Regular Commission meeting for the City of Muskegon was adjourned at
8:18pm.
Respectfully submitted
Gail Kundinger, City Clerk, MMC
TO: Mayor and City Commission
FROM: City Clerk
DATE: January 29, 2004
RE: Policy regarding Conflict oflnterest and Service Pledge
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt a resolution that requires all appointed members
of the various city boards and committees to sign a Conflict oflnterest Form and a
Se1vice Pledge form.
FINANCIAL IMP ACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Legislative Policy Committee met on
January 28, 2004 and recommends approval.
City of Muskegon
Resolution # 2004-1 7 ( b)
WHEREAS, The City Commission for the City of Muskegon recognizes the need for a
policy regarding conflict of interest for all appointed members of the
various city boards, committees and commissions; and
WHEREAS, the public mission of the various boards, committees and commissions is
that the members of the public have confidence in its management and
administration; and
WHEREAS, if a member of these various boards, committees and commissions will
derive any financial profit or gain directly or indirectly by reason of
membership on the board, committee or commission or through services
provided to the organization, the objectivity or loyalty of that member
could be questioned; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission recognizes the importance and responsibility of those
serving as members of the various boards, committees, and commissions
an ask them to pledge to carry out in a trustworthy and diligent manner
the duties and obligations in their roles.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Muskegon City Commission that a each
member of all boards, committees and commission are hereby required to
sign a Service Pledge and Conflict of Interest Form when they are
appointed to the various boards, committees and commissions. These
forms will be current for the appointed term of office for each member.
wrence 0 . Spatar , Commissioner
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE SERVICE PLEDGE
I, - - - - - - - - - - - ~ recognizing the important responsibility I am
undertaking in serving as a member of t h e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ hereby
pledge to carry out in a trustworthy and diligent manner the duties and obligations in
my role as a ______________member. I will exercise the duties and
responsibilities of this office with integrity, collegiality and care.
I PLEDGE:
1. To establish as a high priority my attendance at all meetings of the board,
committees and task forces on which I serve.
2. To come prepared to discuss the issues and business to be addressed at
scheduled meetings, having read the agenda and all background material
relevant to the topics at hand.
3. To work with and respect the opinions of my peers who serve on this
board/committee, and to leave my personal prejudices out of all discussions.
4. To always act for the good of the organization.
5. To represent this organization in a positive and supportive manner at all times
and in all places.
6. To observe the parliamentary procedures and display courteous conduct in all
board, committee and task force meetings.
7. To refrain from intruding on administrative issues that are the responsibility of
management, except to monitor the results and prohibit methods that conflict
with board policy.
8. To avoid conflicts of interest between my position as a board member and my
personal life. If such a conflict does arise, I will declare that conflict before the
board and refrain from voting on matters in which I have a conflict.
9. To participate in 1) annual strategic planning, 2) a board/committee self-
evaluation program, and 3) board development workshops, seminars and other
educational events that enhance my skills as a board/commission/committee
member.
If for any reason, I find myself unable to carry out the above duties as best as I can, I
agree to resign my position as a board/commission/committee member.
Member Signature Date
POLICY TITLE: Conflict of Interest
The _______ Board/Committee/Commission requires that all members disclose
interests that could result in a conflict.
Because of the public mission of the board/committee/commission, it is important that
members of the public have confidence in its management and administration. If a
member of the Board/Committee/Commission will derive any financial profit or gain
directly or indirectly by reason of membership on the Board/Committee/Commission or
through services provided to the organization, the objectivity or loyalty of that member
or employee could be questioned and a charge of self-dealing could be made
because of the possible conflict of interest.
In order to establish a procedure for dealing with the issue and to encourage disclosure,
all Board/Committee/Commission members will be required to submit a disclosure
statement at the beginning of employment or term.
If a matter arises in which a member of the Board/Committee/Commission has a
conflict of interest, the individual shall promptly disclose it to the
Board/Committee/Commission. An individual with a conflict of interest shall not
proceed to make any decision or take any action on behalf of the
Board/Committee/Commission without approval of the Board/Committee/Commission.
Disclosure Statement Regarding Conflict of Interest
I have read and am fully familiar with the policy statement regarding Conflict of Interest
adopted by the City Commission. I am not presently involved in any transaction,
investment or other matter in which I would derive any financial profit or gain directly or
indirectly as a result of my membership on the _ _ _ _Board/Committee/Commission
except as follows:
Furthermore, I agree to disclose any additional conflicts of interest, which may occur in
accordance with the requirements of the policy statement.
Signature ________________ Date _________
Adopted: _ _ _ __
DATE: January 30, 2004
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspections
RE: Concurrence to Amend Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances
Adopting the 2003 International Fire Code.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request City Commission adopt the
attached ordinance amending Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances. This
request is made to adopt the 2003 International Fire Code and retain appendix li-
e of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code.
The request to adopt the 2003 edition is made to put the fire code in line with the
current editions of the construction codes as adopted by the State of Michigan.
Retainage of the appendix 11-C will allow some code enforcement for fire safety
on marina docks.
Staff Recommendation: To adopt the ordinance as written.
Fiscal Impact: None as all code books were budgeted for in
anticipation of this change.
CITY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Commission will consider
this item at it's next meeting, Tuesday, February 10, 2004.
City of Muskegon
Muskegon County, Michigan
ORDINANCE NO. ---2.l.2...3
The City Commission of the City of Muskegon hereby ORDAINS:
Chapter 30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Muskegon concerning the Fire
Prevention Code is amended, as follows:
1. Section 30-91 shall be amended to read, as follows:
Adoption.
The city adopts for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions
hazardous to life and property from fire, hazardous materials or explosion, and for all
other relevant purposes, that certain code known as the International Fire Code, 2003
edition, together with and retaining and readopting appendix II-C of the 1997 Uniform
Fire Code. The adoption and retention of such codes is made except as amended by this
article. Copies of such codes are on file with the city clerk and the codes, as amended,
are made a part hereof as if fully set forth in this article.
This ordinance adopted:
Ayes: Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington
Nays: None
AdoptionDate: February 10, 2004
Effective Date: February 24, 2004
First Reading: February 10, 200 4
Second Reading: _ _ N
_ /_ A _ _ __ __ _ __
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By: ----1~ ~ & . . ~ ~ ~~~!,,,1('.~ ~
Gail A. Kundinger, MMC
City Clerk
C:\WINDOWSITEMP\Consent Agenda - Ordinance.doc
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned, being the duly qualified clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County,
Michigan, does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of an ordinance
adopted by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, at a regular meeting of the City
Commission on the 10 th day of February , 2004, at which meeting a quorum was
present and remained throughout, and that the original of said ordinance is on file in the
records of the City of Muskegon. I further certify that the meeting was conducted, and public
notice was given, pursuant to and in full compliance with Act No. 267, Public Acts of
Michigan of 1976, as amended, and that minutes were kept and will be or have been made
available as required thereby.
DATED: February 1Q2004
Gail A. Kundinger, MMC
Clerk, City of Muskegon
Publish: Notice of Adoption to be published once within ten (10) days of final adoption.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Consent Agenda - Ordinance.doc
CITY OF MUSKEGON
NOTICE OF ADOPTION
TO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED
Please take notice that on February 10, 2004, the City Commission of the City of
Muskegon adopted amendments to the Muskegon City Code concerning the Fire Prevention
Code, summarized as follows:
I. Section 30-91 shall be amended to authorize enforcement of the International Fie
Code, 2003 edition.
Copies of the ordinance may be viewed and purchased at reasonable cost at the Office of
the City Clerk in the City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, during regular business
hours.
This ordinance amendment is effective ten (I 0) days from the date of this publication.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Published February 14 2004 By_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Gail A. Kundinger, MMC, Its Clerk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PUBLISH ONCE WITHIN TEN (I 0) DAYS OF FINAL PAS SAGE.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\ConsentAgenda - Ordinance.doc
Date: 2/3/2004
To: Honorable ~a.;
yrornd City Commissioners
From: Ric Scott J!fl-.
RE: Consumers Energy Easement
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Consumers Energy is requesting an easement across the
bike trial property at Edison Landing to service the CSX
railroad crossing.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Affirmative Action
(231)724-6703
FAX: (231)722-1214
~Wi·H:i:f-)UJi"lirntion
FAX: (231)726-5 181
g•rNI.?6~31,.. 1111en1
FAX: (231)726-56 17
City Manager
(231\724-6724
l'AX: (231)722-1214
C ivil Service
r23n124-61 16
FAX: (23 1)724-4405
Date.• 2/3/2004
To: Honorable d City Commis sioners
Clerk
23 1)724-6705
1'AX: (23 1)724-4178 From: Ric Scott
Re: Consumers Energy Easement
Consume rs Energy is r eque sting an easement across the
bike t rail at Edison Landing to service the CSCX
Computer Info.
railroad c r ossi ng at that location.
,2~m~~'!6744
FAX: (231)722-4301
Staff would recommend appr oval of the request.
fi~1\~1':/tfb1/'J'I. Thank you f or your consideration.
FAX: (231)727-6904
r1irsis.ii;m
FAX: (23 1)724-6985
Income Tax
(231)724-6770
FAX: (23 1)724-6768
'mi'fl~~if1"srviccs
l'AX: (23 1)728-4371
Leisure Services
(231)724-6704
FAX: (231)724-1196
Treasurer's Office
231)724-6720
1'AX: (231)724-6768
n'J/ffz~'.~~l\ De1it.
FAX: (231)724-6768
Weter Filtrntion
(231)724-4106
FAX: (23 1)755-5290
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, Ml 49443-0536
www.shorelinecity.com
EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
Form 468 4-2003
Tax Code: 616029 2004-17(d)
W .0. #05833462
640 Terrace
Parties: "Owner" is the City of Muskegon. a Michigan public authority and body corporate
Owner's address is 933 Terrace Street. Muskegon. Ml 49443-0536
"Consumers" is CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, a Michigan corporation. Consumers' address is
One Energy Plaza, Jackson, Michigan 49201.
Grant of Easement: For good and valuable consideration, Owner grants Consumers a permanent
easement for underground electric line in, on, under, and across a portion of "Owner's Land," called the
"Easement Area." Owner's Land is in the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, and State of Michigan
and is described in the attached Exhibit A. The Easement Area is within Owner's Land and is described
in the attached Exhibit B.
Purpose: The purpose of the easement is to grant Consumers the right to enter Owner's Land to
construct, operate, inspect, maintain, replace, improve, remove, and enlarge an underground electric
line in the Easement Area. The underground electric lines may consist of underground cables (including
fiber-optic cable), conduits, wires, conductors, subsurface junction vaults, surface-mounted transformers
and enclosures, and other equipment for transmitting and distributing electrical energy and
communications signals.
Trees and Other Vegetation: Consumers shall have the right from time to time hereafter to enter
Owner's Land to trim, cut down, and otherwise remove and control any trees, brush, roots, and other
vegetation, whether inside or outside the Easement Area, that Consumers believes may interfere with
the construction, operation, and maintenance of the underground electric line or lateral lines.
Buildings/Structures: Owner shall not: 1) locate any buildings, structures, septic systems, drain fields,
ponds, or swimming pools within the Easement Area, 2) plant any trees within the Easement Area, or 3)
change the ground elevation within the Easement Area. If Owner violates this provision, Owner shall
reimburse Consumers for any expenses Consumers incurs correcting the violation. If Consumers
corrects the violation by relocating the electric line or lateral line on Owner's Land, this easement shall
automatically apply to such relocated line.
Exercise of Easement: Grantee's nonuse or limited use of this Easement shall not preclude Grantee's
later use of this Easement to its full extent.
Successors: This easement shall bind and benefit Owner's and Consumers' respective heirs,
successors, lessees, licensees, and assigns.
Date: __F_e_b_r_u_a_r..._y_l-'-0......,___;;c2_;:0_;:0_4_ _ __
Owner: City of Muskegon, a Michigan public
autho i an body corporate
Acknowledgment
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me in Muskegon County, Michigan,
on fe-6 r1A.C?t;;L!/, J19o Y by Stepen J . Warmington, Mayor of City of Muskegon, a
Michigan pub(ic authority and body corporate
L :n&o. s. l'o tt f'r Notary Public
f(lus /(e.JL o r- County, Michigan
V
Acting in --l-m
'-'--'-....u...,,,s,__,k,
_,___,b_..O
, ""-"'.
QL-C?- '----- County
My Commission expires: _ _.._
7_-...:::o?
._s- o......fz"---_
_ - -"-
This easement is exempt from real estate transfer tax pursuant to MCLA 207.505(f) and from State real
estate transfer tax pursuant to the provisions of MCLA 207.526(f).
Prepared By: Alan Poling
Consumers Energy Company
4000 Clay Avenue SW, P.O. Box 201
Grand Rapids, Ml 49502-0494
Form 468 4-2003
EXHIBIT A
Owner's Land
A 15.0 foot wide right of way for pedestrian usage the center line of which is described as:
Commence at the intersection of the Northeasterly line of Terrace Street, being the Southwesterly line of
Block 557 extended to the centerline of vacated Water Street; thence North 62°44'00" West 381.45 feet
along the northeasterly right of way line of Terrace Street; thence Westerly 269.86 feet, along said
northeasterly right of way line, said line being a 302.48 foot radius curve to the left with a central angle of
51 °07'00" and a chord which bears North 88°17'30" West 261.00 feet, to the line between Lots 5 and 6
of said Block 558; thence North 46°09'15" West 78.34 feet, along said line, to the PLACE OF
BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION: Thence Northeasterly 628.75 feet, along a 795.75 foot radius
curve to the right, having a central angle of 45°16'17" and a chord which bears North 70°05'06" East
612.52 feet; thence South 87°16'46" East 1246.74 feet; thence Northeasterly 1510.50 feet, along a
1279.84 foot radius curve to the left, having a central angle of 67°37'19" and a chord which bears North
58°54'34" East 1424.34 feet to the place of ending of this center line description. The northerly line of
said easement is to be shortened or lengthened to intersect the line between Lots 5 and 6 of said Block
558; and the southerly line is to be shortened or lengthened to intersect the line between Lots 5 and 6 of
said Block 558 and the westerly right of way line of Western Avenue.
EXHIBIT B
Easement Area
A 10 foot-wide strip of land, as shown in the attached drawing, being 5 feet on each side of each
underground electric line, as constructed on Owner's Land.
Form 468 4·2003
ljJ
I
')
WO# 05833452
lvl[ JC:/< l~
.•
C (-.[)~I
'-<) ..7 .• I
\.
('""\
Ii _,~./
~32J C IT Y OF MUS f'. EGOfJ
LJ.J T I O R 1 G SEC, I 9
u
<[
cc.
o-
LLI
r-
~
?i:;
,__ ,.,!
I
1 f-::1 _18 1
- • 1-" ·:- BIKEPATH 15' ROW
-1---1 '7' . -----------,7"-'fofl..,·'I""-<;_---
! \
'
/ \ CSX RR 50' ROW
rr, \
-----------
!' \ CSX
--\
METER SOCKET
I
1
'f:10 EA.SEME~IT
SHORELif\lE
Fenn 468 4-2003
Date: February 1 O, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Janitorial Services, Option Year (2004-2005)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Exercise the "option year" in the City's 2001-2003 contract with Edwards Janitorial to clean
City Hall and Public Service Building for an additional monthly charges of $151.62 for City
Hall and $50.79 for DPW. The total annual cost for this option year is $56,520 for City Hall,
which is $367.85 more than what was submitted as part of the bids for option year back in
February of 2001. Similarly, the proposed annual DPW charges are $17,400 which is
$121.35 more than 2001 bids for an option year.
Those extra charges are being requested by Edwards, see attached letter, due to a
significant increase in his workman compensation.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The total cost of the contract which $73,920
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None, the option year cost was anticipated during the budget time and the extras are
minor.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the extension of the contract with Edwards Janitorial to provide cleaning
services until the end of April of 2005.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
RECEIVED
City of Muskegon CITY OF MUSKEGON
Attn: Mr. Mohammed Al-Shatel, P.E. JAN 3 0 2004
933 Terrace St.
P.O. Box536 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Muskegon, Michigan 49443-0536
1/26/04
Dear Sir:
This year we have received a significant increase in our workmens
compensation insurance ( total of$ 3,382.00 per year). In addition in order
to keep the increase at this level we were required to initiate drug testing
and physicals for all new hires. The cost of this will be a minimum of close
to $ 1,000.00 each year. After much pricing both by my insurance agents
and myself we still found that our insurance supplier was very competitive.
I am asking that all of my customers help defray these costs.
For the City of Muskegon this amounts to$ 489.00 per year. If this
is agreeable this would be effective 5/01/04 which starts the fourth year
optional contract. Our pricing would be $ 4710 per month for the City Hall
and $ 1450 per month( plus extra add ons) for the Public Service Building.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Any questions feel
free to call me. ( 231) 744-3569.
Edwards JanitoriaJ Servt9e
;D~l.tEM~
David L. Edwards
Agenda Item No. _ _ __
City Commission Meeting _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: January 22,2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
From: Department of Public Works
Re: Traffic Department materials and services 2004
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Contract with the Muskegon County Road Commission for the joint purchase of various
Traffic Department materials and services. We have bid out these items with MCRC for the
past fomieen years. By bidding together with MCRC and other municipalities we are able to
get better unit prices because oflarger quantity purchases.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Sign materials and services to be jointly bid:
Sign blanks ............................................... $1,500.00 approx.
Sign posts ................................................ $4,800.00 approx.
Sign sheeting ............................................. $1,500.00 approx.
Ready Made Signs ....................................... $2,000.00 approx.
Centerline painting .................................... $12,000.00 approx.
Total $21,800.00 ($21,200.00 in 2003)
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None, this item is requested each year in the appropriate Highway budgets.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the continued joint purchasing with the Muskegon County Road Commission for
sign materials and services.
City of Muskegon
Traffic Department
Memo
To: Bob Kuhn
From: Dan Gomez
Date: 01-22-04
Re: Sign Materials & Services: Annual Contract
Again this year we are requesting permission to bid jointly for our sign materials and services with the
Muskegon County Road Commission as we have done the last fourteen years. They are getting ready
to go out for bids on the following items and thus we do not have any actual quotes for 2004.
For sign blanks:
2000 2001 2002 2003
sign blanks • $1.50/sq. ft. $1.47/sq. ft. $1.40/sq. ft. $1.34/sq ft
For sign posts:
2000 2001 2002 2003
2#x 11' posts • $5.45/ea. $5.76/ea. $6.15/ea. $6.08
3# x 12' posts • . $8.92/ea. $9.42/ea. $10.08/ea . $9.96
For sheeting: Our standard has always been 3M sheeting, they are the only bid usually received by
MCRC, they like us, use 3M sheeting exclusively, however we recently purchased our 3M roller, as did
MCRC, and no longer have to buy a mimimum order to keep the roller they originally gave to us to
maintain the warranty on their sheeting. Other competitive sources are also bidded out .
Centerline painting: Before 1997, we contracted with the MCRC for this work. In 1997 they sold their
equipment and we jointly bid with all other cities and townships in the County. In 1997 M&M Pavement
Marking, Inc. was awarded the bid and has since been extended the contract every year since at the
same unit prices. Our overall cost since 1998 has been higher because we painted over significant
amounts of faded permanent pavement marking and painting costs have increased.
$10,082 (M&M) $10,060 (M&M) $11,228 (M&M) $10,737(M&M)
• Page 1
Date: February 3, 2004
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: City Treasurer
RE: Write-off of Uncollectible Accounts Receivable
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Periodically it is necessary to purge from the City's general accounts receivable records items
that are deemed uncollectible. In most cases these items have gone through the entire
collection process without success. In some other cases, further collections efforts, such as
using the outside collection agency, resulted in limite:l success. However, at this time, it is
requested that the City Comnission authorize staff to write-off these receivables from the
City's books.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Reduce the City's accounts receivable by $16,304.90. The impact would be a decrease in
the fund balance/retained earnings of several City funds as follows:
101 General Fund $ 7,068.87
472 CDBG Fund 5,681.30
590 & 591 Sewer Fund & Water Fund 3,554.73
Total $16,304.90
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
For the General, Sewer and Water Funds, theie are sufficient funds for bad debt expense
included in the 2003 budget, so no further action is required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the 2003 write-offs effective for the fi&:al year ended December 31, 2003 for the
various funds as shown above.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
N/A
1
City of Muskegon
Invoices Submitted For Write Off-2003 Fiscal Year
Invoice No. Date of Service/Invoice Invoiced To Reason for Write Off Amount
9818343 2/16/01 JILLIAN RUCKER CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 50.00
9818931 4/13/01 JILLIAN RUCKER CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 126.00
9827508 10/18/02 JASON DAVID JANCZYK CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 50.00
9822888 12/21/01 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 70.00
9823162 12/31/01 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 119.30
9824180 4/26/02 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 90.00
9827234 10/4/02 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 55.00
9826732 9/13/02 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 335.46
9827745 11/1/02 JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 126.00
9818650 3/16/01 ROBERT FRANK RUDNICK II CHP 7BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 50.00
9825432 7/12/02 JOHN L ANDERSON JR TAX FORECLOSURE $ 122.00
9825002 6/14/02 JEFFERY M. JANUSKA TAX FORECLOSURE $ 40.00
9825591 7/19/02 JEFFERY M. JANUSKA TAX FORECLOSURE $ 60.00
9824557 5/24/02 HERBERT RUSS TAX FORECLOSURE $ 171.25
9825225 7/5/02 HERBERT RUSS TAX FORECLOSURE $ 122.00
9825982 7/26/02 HERBERT RUSS TAX FORECLOSURE $ 92.00
9826938 9/20/02 HERBERT RUSS TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00
9818400 2/16/01 VIVIAN/CIRILA L. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 75.00
9819025 4/20/01 VIVIAN/CIRILA L. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 70.00
9819132 4/27/01 VIVIAN/CIRILA L. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 106.11
9819419 5/25/01 VIVIAN/CIRILA L. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 45.00
9820106 6/29/01 VIVIAN/Cl RI LAL. PEREZ CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 45.00
9817195 10/13/00 MICHAELJONATHON KLINE UNABLE TO LOCATE - UNCOLLECTABLE $ 50.00
9825481 7/19/02 JOSEPH LYMAN BATILE DECEASED $ 50.00
9830588 6/27/03 ROGER BALCOM TAX FORECLOSURE $ 122.00
9829999 5/30/03 ERIK J. GARVEY DECEASED $ 75.00
9819708 6/15/01 CARRIE WILLIAMS DECEASED $ 122.00
9822047 10/12/01 CARRIE WILLIAMS DECEASED $ 104.00
9824084 4/12/02 CARRIE WILLIAMS DECEASED $ 211.57
9825082 6/28/02 CARRIE WILLIAMS DECEASED $ 29.33
9821527 9/14/01 TAWANA LETRECE MCQUARTER CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 50.00
9827644 8/20/80 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 86.00
9809854 4/23/99 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 99.82
9816954 10/6/00 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 30.00
9817476 11/10/00 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 30.00
9820485 7/20/01 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 30.00
9821224 8/31/01 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 30.00
Page 1 of3
City of Muskegon
Invoices Submitted For Write Off - 2003 Fiscal Year
Invoice No. Date of Service/Invoice Invoiced To Reason for Write Off Amount
9822261 10/26/01 ELIZABETH HATHORN DECEASED $ 60.00
9825093 6/28/02 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 132.43
9806141 7/31/98 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 104.00
9809840 4/23/99 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 98.64
9810666 6/25/99 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 104.00
9811674 8/27/99 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 86.00
9812415 10/15/99 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 104.00
9814302 4/28/00 NICK E. GLAVAS DECEASED $ 278.00
9824477 5/17/02 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 3,095.00
9824697 617102 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 92.00
9826855 9/20/02 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 134.00
9827065 9/27/02 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 134.00
9827829 11/1/02 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 122.00
9821427 9/14/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00
9822574 11/21/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00
9809667 4/9/99 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 100.16
9811081 7/23/99 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 93.30
9811893 9/10/99 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 18.00
9814287 4/28/00 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 216.04
9815460 7/14/00 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 122.00
9816372 8/25/00 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 122.00
9816999 10/13/00 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 128.42
9817056 10/13/00 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 122.00
9819552 6/8/01 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 129.66
9819756 6/15/01 VERN EDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00
9820351 7/13/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00
9821185 8/17/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 88.00
9821427 9/14/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 86.00
9821718 9/28/01 VERNEDA MARTIN DECEASED $ 338.84
9824024 4/12/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 104.66
9824450 5/17/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00
9825725 7/26/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00
9826476 8/23/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00
9827632 10/25/02 EDWIN C BACKING TAX FORECLOSURE $ 86.00
9820984 8/17/01 WILLIAM BAI LEY LEGAL SETTLEMENT $ 2,085.70
9824405 4/1/02 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 75.00
9822769 10/19/01 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 119.30
Page 2 of3
City of Muskegon
Invoices Submitted For Write Off~ 2003 Fiscal Year
Invoice No. Date of Service/Invoice Invoiced To Reason for Write Off Amount
9824051 5/7/02 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 122.52
9823800 2/1/02 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 75.00
9824033 3/13/02 DAVID ELLIS CHP 7 BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE $ 95.66
9829106 3/7/2003 PAT LOUIS KERBUSKI DECEASED $ 50.00
$ 12,750.17
Page 3 of 3
City of Muskegon
Water/Sewer Items Submitted for Write Off - 2003 Fiscal Year
Account# Service Address Customer Name Reason for Write Off Code Amount
225365001 324 W LARCH AVE JULLIAN E RUCKER CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 6.06
225365001 324 W LARCH AVE JULLIAN E RUCKER CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 10.58
225365001 324 W LARCH AVE JULLIAN E RUCKER CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 89.78
225365001 324 W LARCH AVE JULLIAN E RUCKER CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 134.47
316440303 2185 BLODGETT ST JASON JANCZYK CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 10.08
316440303 2185 BLODGETT ST JASON JANCZYK CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 18.08
316440303 2185 BLODGETT ST JASON JANCZYK CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 106.53
316440303 2185 BLODGETT ST JASON JANCZYK CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 203.04
120390003 1370 WINTERS ST CAROLYN YOUNG CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 2.09
120390003 1370 WINTERS ST CAROLYN YOUNG CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 2.99
120390003 1370 WINTERS ST CAROLYN YOUNG CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 13.40
120390003 1370 WINTERS ST CAROLYN YOUNG CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 22.38
404631002 1637 NEW ST JACOB POSTEMA CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 4.86
404631002 1637 NEW ST JACOB POSTEMA CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 56.77
309032602 784 WASHINGTON AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 30.81
309032602 784 WASHINGTON AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 55.47
309032602 784 WASHINGTON AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 250.18
309032602 784 WASHINGTON AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 466.17
225397602 1988 PARK ST JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 1.42
225397602 1988 PARK ST JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 2.12
225397602 1988 PARK ST JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 12.68
225397602 1988 PARK ST JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 19.18
220350002 121 E HOLBROOK AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 3.16
220350002 121 E HOLBROOK AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 5.55
220350002 121 E HOLBROOK AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 67.51
220350002 121 E HOLBROOK AVE JEFF BRANDEL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 109.77
217302501 1562 SANFORD ST JACK HUGHEY CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 37.78
217302501 1562 SANFORD ST JACK HUGHEY CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 53.05
207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 6.27
207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 12.64
207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 50.00
207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 124.08
Page 1 of2
City of Muskegon
Water/Sewer Items Submitted for Write Off - 2003 Fiscal Year
Account# Service Address Customer Name Reason for Write Off Code Amount
207120101 1122 SPRING ST ROBERT THOMAS CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 209.21
219415004 196 IRWIN AVE KEVIN MCCLOUD CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 155.85
219415004 196 IRWIN AVE KEVIN MCCLOUD CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 284.55
219415004 196 IRWIN AVE KEVIN MCCLOUD CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 9.13
219415004 196 IRWIN AVE KEVIN MCCLOUD CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 17.30
120190004 875 MANGIN AVE MICHAEL J. WOOD CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 3.84
120190004 875 MANGIN AVE MICHAEL J. WOOD CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 2.29
120190004 875 MANGIN AVE MICHAEL J. WOOD CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 34.84
120190004 875 MANGIN AVE MICHAEL J. WOOD CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 38.28
221095101 229 E. GRAND AVE MINNIE TUNSTULL CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 105.57
221095101 229 E. GRAND AVE MINNIE TUNSTULL CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 186.71
201212502 135 OTTAWA ST SEAWAY MOTORS CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 347.24
399285101 1050 W. WESTERN MELLOWOOD DEVELOPMENT CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 1.53
399285101 1050 W. WESTERN MELLOWOOD DEVELOPMENT CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 0.50
399285101 1050 W. WESTERN MELLOWOOD DEVELOPMENT CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 45.99
399285101 1050 W. WESTERN MELLOWOOD DEVELOPMENT CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 7.50
206245001 316 IONAAVE ALBERT BRADFORD DECEASED WATER $ 10.17
206245001 316 IONAAVE ALBERT BRADFORD DECEASED SEWER $ 10.17
116160802 1469 EASTWOOD DR CHARMEL STEDMAN CHP 7 DISCHARGE WATER $ 8.25
116160802 1469 EASTWOOD DR CHARMEL STEDMAN CHP 7 DISCHARGE SEWER $ 8.80
208165001 169 IONAAVE BILLY BROOKSHIRE UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE SEWER $ 9.04
208165001 169 IONAAVE BILLY BROOKSHIRE UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE WATER $ 7.09
218090002 1222 PECK STREET DENNIS ENDE UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE WATER $ 3.18
218090002 1222 PECK STREET DENNIS ENDE UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE SEWER $ 6.22
225122501 337 W. GRAND AVE EDWARD G HOUGHTALING UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE SEWER $ 9.74
225122501 337 W. GRAND AVE EDWARD G HOUGHTALING UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE WATER $ 8.84
216340101 1759 JEFFERSON ST DARRELL O'NEAL DECEASED SEWER $ 9.75
216340101 1759 JEFFERSON ST DARRELL O'NEAL DECEASED WATER $ 9.75
217445109 1880 SANFORD ST UP RHONDA BROWN UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE SEWER $ 13.57
217445109 1880 SANFORD ST UP RHONDA BROWN UNCOLLECTABLE-SMALL BALANCE WATER $ 0.88
$ 3,554.73
Page 2 of2
Commission Meeting Date: February 10, 2004
Date: January 26, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Planning & Economic Developmentlt,L
RE: Public Hearing • Request for the Establishment of an
Industrial Development District - Streamline Tooling
Systems, Inc.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Pursuant to Public Act 198 of 1974, as amended, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.,
301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan, has requested the establishment of an
Industrial Development District for property located at 301 W. Laketon Avenue,
Muskegon, Michigan.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the attached resolution establishing the Industrial Development District for
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
None
1/26/2004
Resolution No. 2004-18 (a)
MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION
RESOLUTION APPROVING REQUEST
FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Act No. 198 of the Public Acts of 1974, as amended, the City
of Muskegon has the authority to establish an "Industrial Development District" within
the City of Muskegon; and
WHEREAS, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon,
Michigan, has requested the City of Muskegon to establish an Industrial Development
District on property located at 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, hereinafter
described; and
WHEREAS, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc. presently operations a production facility
within the Industrial Development District; and
WHEREAS, construction, acquisition, alterations, or installation of machinery and
equipment has not commenced at the time of filing the request to establish this district;
and
WHEREAS, written notice has been given by mail to all owners of real property located
within the proposed district, and to the public by newspaper advertisement in the
Muskegon Chronicle and public posting of the hearing on the establishment of the
proposed district; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the establishment of an Industrial Development District
was held on February 10, 2004, at the regular City Commission meeting at the
Muskegon City Hall at which time all of the owners of real property within the proposed
district, all residents and taxpayers of the City of Muskegon, and the affected taxing
jurisdictions were afforded an opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Muskegon City Commission deems
it to be in the best interest of the City of Muskegon that the following described land
situated in the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, and the State of Michigan, to wit:
CITY OF MUSKEGON DENNIS SMITH & COS SECOND ADDITION LOTS 18-19 &
20 & E 8 FT OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING SAME BLK 2
Be and here established as an Industrial Development District pursuant to the
provisions of Act 198 of the Public Acts of 1974 to be known as Streamline Tooling
Systems, Inc. No. 2 004-1 B (a)
1/26/04
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Industrial Development District will be rescinded
following the completion of capital acquisition and/or improvement activities.
Resolution declared adopted.
Ayes: Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington,
Carter
Nays: None
Absent: None
Attest: - ~ ~ ~i...__.n,,,!,,,&~~e:a.c;~~
Gail Kundinger
Clerk, MMC
I hereby certify that the foregoing constitutes a true and complete copy of a resolution
adopted by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon,
Michigan, at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2004.
1/26/04
Affirmative Action
(231)724-6703
FAX: (231)722-1214
)
fi~TNiJ!6Y;rarlment
l<'AX: (231)726-5617
:r
Citv Manager
(231)724-6724
FAX: (231)722-1214 West Michigan's Shoreline City
Civil Service
1231)724-6716
CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT
fAX: (231)724-4405
Clerk
January 2 7, 2004
(231)724-6705
tAX: (231)724-4178
Community and
,Jt\i\i 2 7 ?004
(l~f{ftltNf~ces City of Muskegon
FAX: (231)726-2501
Assessor's Office
Computer Info, 93 3 Terrace Street
t2lHi;T.~144
FAX: {231)722-4301 Muskegon, MI 49440
RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
~~-1~)4~~~ To Whom It May Concern:
tAX: (231)724-6768
YlIT)~it6192 A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198
(<AX: (23 I}724-6985
of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling
Income Tax
Systems, Inc., 301 W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441.
(231)724-6770
FAX: (231)724-6768
A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has
been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933
Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and
Leisure Services
representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard.
(2311724-6704
FAX: (231)724-1196
Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at
(231) 724-6702.
Plannine/Zoning
(23 l\7U-6702
FAX: (231)724-6790 --~--
Sincerely,
/ /t/l<e.
a--:,
'1'(__, . .,. -
(
~onna Anguilm (j
Assistant Planner
rubl/lih\~~Ilifi Dept.
l<A : (231)722-4188
Treasurer's Office
123J1724-6720
FA : (231)724-6768
jjfl/tef2~!~~~\ Dept.
FA : (231)724-6768
Wati:r Filtration
'231)724--4106
FAX: (l31)7~S..5290
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, MI 49443-0536
www.shorelinecity.com
Affirmative Action
(231 }724-6703
FAX: (231)722-1214
ti\siNfJ!fjH~nlizntion
FAX: (231)726-5181
fi}iNtr6~;rarlmcnt
FAX: {231)726-5617
City Manager
(231 )724-6724
FAX: (231)722-1214 Wcst Michigan's Shornline City
Civil Service
(l31)7l4-6716
CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT
FAX: (231)724-4405
Clerk
January 27, 2004
/lJ 1)724-6705
FAX: {231)724-4178
Muskegon Public Schools
Hackley Administration Building
Computer Info. 349 W. Webster Avenue
(l~nw:r-i,44
FAX: (231)721-4301 Muskegon, MI 49440
Engineering_ Dept.
(231 }724-6707 RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
t,'AX: (231)727-6904
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
rlfiY7\eiln~
FAX: (231)724-6768 To Whom It May Concern:
A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198
of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling
Income Tax
Systems, Inc., 30! W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441.
(2J 1)724-6770
FAX: (231)724-6768
A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has
been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933
Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and
Leisure Services
representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard.
(l31)7l4-6704
FAX: (231)724--1196
Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at
(231) 724-6702.
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
Plannine/Zoning
Sincerely,
(2311724'6702
FAX: (231)724-6790
-, • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signature
~;;- item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
l J. '--,-? • Print your name and address on the reverse X {/Vtl<)1VA,
. 1.~ •
so that we can return the card to you.
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
8. ~eceived by ( Printed Name) IC. Date of Delivery
Lonna Angmlm or on the front if space permits. XS/1lU,./f)f/ {..JW1<..f:ia., I·· t', ·04,
Assistant Planner D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? D Yes
bl,1:~21-~J~ Dept. ii YES, enter delivery address below:
FAX: (231)722-4188
Treu1urer's Office
(231)724-6720
FAX: (231)724-6768
3. Service Type
n'!f)fzt~!Ji\Dept. Bf Certified Mail D Express Mail
FAX: (231)724-6768 D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise
D Insured Mail D C.0.0,
Waler Filtration
(131)724-4106
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) • Yes
FAX: (231)755-5290 2, Article Number
City of Muskegon, S (Transfer from service label}
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRl-03-Z-0985
Affirmative Aclion
rrn )'24-6703
fAX: (231)722-1214
tiWl.ffff~~Rlizafom
FAX: (231)726-S181
Cemetery Deparlmenl
(231 )124-6783
FAX: (231)726-5617
City Manager
rm )124-6724
FAX: (231)722-1214
Civil Service
fl JI )124-6716 CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT
FAX: (231)724-4405
Clerk
January 27, 2004
flJI 1714-6705
FAX: (231)724-4178
Community and
,2~f{~r:i-~Wtes Muskegon Community College
FAX: (231)726-2S01
221 Quarterline Road
Computer Info. Muskegon, MI 49442
o~n;14_~744
FAX: (231)722-4301
RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
To Whom It May r.:oncern:
A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198
nn)~Itti,92
FAX: (231)724-6985
of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling
Systems, Inc., 301 W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441.
Income Tu
flJ1)'24-6770
FAX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has
been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933
Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and
representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard.
Leisure Sen-ices
fl31)7l4-6704
FAX: (2Jl)724-ll96 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at
(231) 724-6702,
Sincerely,
SENDER: COMPLETE WIS SECTION
Plannim:UZoning /"
rm 112.i:6102
FAX: (231)724-6790 -: _J)·;i\-'V½', '
l__ ( · • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. t)d..Agent
• Print your name and address on the reverse X D Addressee
Lonna Anguilm so that we can return the card to you. B. Rece~e,.d br (Printed Name) C. Date f Deliyerx
Assistant Planner • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, l(, ( · ~ /\A.('{,', · J )4 {l '(
or on !he front if space permits.
o. Is delivery address different from item 1? D Yes
If YES, enter deUvery address below:
Treasurer's Office
flJJ)724'6720
~'AX: (231)724•6768
3. Service Type
Ci' Certified Mail D Express Mail
D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise
D Insured Mail • C.0.D.
Waler Filtration
rm 112<-m6 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes
FAX: (231)755.5290
City of Muskegon, ~
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label)
--;aooosd_o 001'-13733 9c)(Y-f
PS. Fnrm '.i811 A1m11st ::>001 Dome.<ltic Return Aeceiot 2ACPAl-03-Z-0985
Affirmative Action
(231\724-6703
FAX: (231)722-1214
City J\.fana2er
(231\724-6724
FAX: (231)722-1214
Civil Service
(231 )724-6716
CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT
FAX: (231)724-4405
Clerk
January 27, 2004
(231)724-6705
MX: (231)724-4178
Community and
,2~1:,r:i1~7Jces
FAX: (231)726-2501 Muskegon Area Intermediate School District
630 Harvey Street
Computer Info. Muskegon, MI 49442
,2~HW4-~144
FAX: (231)721-4301
RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
To Whom It May Concern:
nril~~t/~'¥l~
FAX: (231)724-6768
A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198
of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling
Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441.
Income Tu
(231)724-6770
FAX: {131)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establislunent of an Industrial Development District has
been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933
Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and
representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard.
Leisure Sen-Ices
(231)724-6704
FAX: (231)724-1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at
(231) 724-6702.
Sincerely,
SENDER: COMB.LETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ,
Plan nine/Zoning \....-j. . '
(231 \724-6702 Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
FAX: (231)724-6790 .11ti'-'-"- item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse
Lonna Anguilm so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
Assistant Planner or on the front if space permits.
• Is delivery address different from ilem 1?
~~1;~'u°i'.w. tlftUJt. &J1 if YES, enter delivery address below:
Trusurer's Office
(231)724-6720
fAX: (131)714-6768
((; 3 oEf iw'LL,e_y,
'1 lcuDlc '11 I I 3. Service Type
I
L/9'Lf Lf J. )lf Certffied Mail
0 Registered
D Express Mail
D Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail • C.O.D.
Water Fillration 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
(231)724-4106
FAX: (131)755-5290
2. Article Number
City of Muskegon, ~ (Transfer from setvice label)
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRl-03-Z-0985
Affirmative Action
(231)724-6703
FAX: (231)722-1214
Cemeleiy Deparlmenl
flJI \714-6783
FAX: (231)726-5617
City Manager
fl]) )714-6724
FAX: (231)712-1214
Civil Service
flJl\124-6716
CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT
FAX: (231)724-4405
January 27, 2004
Clerk
flJ I \124-670!
FAX: (231)724-4178
Community and
(l~f{ft4.i~'i'tes Muskegon County Commission
•·AX: (231)726-2501
990 Terrace Street
Compuler Info. Muskegon,MI49442
,2~Hl~7.i144
FAX: (231)722-4301
RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
To Whom It May Concern:
A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198
nrrNtf.'6192 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling
FAX: (231)724-6985
Systems, Inc., 301 W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441.
Income Tu
(231 )724-6770
MX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has
been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933
Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and
representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard.
Leisure Sen·ices
fl JI }724-6704
FAX: (231)724-1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at
(231) 724-6702.
Sincerely,
,,-· SENDER: <;OMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
Plannin2'Zoning
fl31)7l4'670l
FAX: (231)724-6790 ))>)l \.,. ( {;.,. •
---- .1..
Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
'
l • Print your name and address on the reverse
Lonna Anguilm so that we can return the card to you. ery
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
Assistant Planner or on the front if space permits.
D. Is delivery address different from ite
1. Article Addressed lo: (
fi1~\i~2:~~ht Dept, lf YES, enter delivery address below:
FAX: (231)722-4188 'n lGsk<:5u11 ~cun+y Comm1
nn,"' ,- ~,
Treasurer's Office •~<...'...' 1 e.1 , a..c e....
flJI )714-6720
FAX: (131)724-6768
I\\ US½Jc_,n 3. Service Type
n'f/ffz~~~~~\ Dept, 1:81 Certified Mail D Express Mail
FAX: (231)724-6768 D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise
D Insured Mail • C.0.0.
Water Filtration
fl31l7l4-4106
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) • Yes
-1 too 65 cl O 00 I '-/ 3 7.3 3 9/ rf I
FAX: (131)755-5290
2. Article Number
City of Muskegon, 9; (Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, AUQUSl 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPR!-03-Z-0965
Affirmative Action
12Jl l724-670J
fAX: (2Jl)722-l214
Assessor/Equalization
ll31)7l4-6708
FAX: (231)726-5181
Cemetery Deparlmenl
llJ! 1124-6783
FAX: (231)726-5617
City Manager
llJI 1724-6724
FAX: (2JJ)722-JZl4
Civil Service CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT
llJ!l724-6716
FAX: (231)724-4405
Clerk
January 27, 2004
231)724-6705
1'AX: (231)724-4178
Community and
Neigh. Services
1231)724-6717
FAX: (231)726-2501 Hackley Public Library
296 W. Webster Avenue
Computer Info. Muskegon, MI 49440
u~n;~7.~,4 .
FAX: (231)722-4301
RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
~~,\~1~'t-Jhfepl, Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
FAX: (131)727-6904
Finance D~t. To Whom It May Concern:
123 ll724-6n3
FAX: (231)724-6768
A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198
of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling
Systems, Inc., 301 W Laketon Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49441.
Income Tax
1231)724-6770
FAX: (231)724-6768 A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has
been set for Tuesday, February 10, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933
lflfffl~~if1Tices Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and
FAX: (231)728-4371
representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the oppotiunity to be heard.
Leisure Services
1231)714-6704
!<AX: (231)724-1196 Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at
(231) 724-6702.
Sincerely,
SENDEf!: COMPLETE THIS SECTION · COMPLETE THJ5 SECTICN ON DELIVERY •!
Plannine/Zoning
,.,.--,
1131 l7lf-6702 ,.
1
•• , • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
FAX: (231)724-6790 l.. c,1-- :+,l,\. item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
J • Print your name and address on the reverse X
·1 ·. · so that we can return the card to you. B. ;'Received by ( Printed Name)
Lonna Angm Ill • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
Assistant Planner or on the front ii space permits. X ::S-: .. . •,t , ,,
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? D Yes
1. Article Addressed to:
Public Works Depl. ii YES, enter delivery address below: D No
llJI )724-4100
FAX: (231)722-4188
/-JQcl<-\ ej 't=t,bl i c L1 bra.y
Treasurer's Office cJ9 Co w. we_\::i3rcy-~ [
1131 )724-6720
FAX: (231)724-6768
.l'Y'\ us½5cJ, 111 \
3. Service Type
49YYD 31- Certified Mail
D Registered
D Express Mail
0 Return Recelpl for Merchandise
D Insured Mail • C.O.D.
Water Fillr• tion
(131)724-4106
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) • Yes
MX: (231)75S-.5290
2. Article Number . ~rc,00 QSQ O 00/ cf 37 3 3 9 / 79
C 1·ty of M us k egon, 9. (Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPAl·03-Z-098s
Affirmative Action
(231 l7l4-670J
}<'AX: (lJI)722-lll4
Cemetery Departmcnl
(231 l7l 4-678J
FAX: {231)726-5617
Citv Mana~er
f2Jll714-6724
FAX: (231)722•1214
Civil Service CERTIFIED/RETURN RECEIPT
(231 )7!4-67 (6
FAX: (231)724-4405
January 27, 2004
Clerk
(231 l114-6705
FAX: (231)724-4178
Community and
{2~f~1r:i-i11~ces Scott and Danette Sherman
1-'AX: (231)726-2501
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
Computer Info. 301 W. Laketon Avenue
a~n;24_i744
FAX: (231)722-4301 Muskegon, MI 49441
RE: Application for Establishment of an Industrial Development District -
Streamline Tooling Systems, Inc.
Finance Di;t!I.
(231 }724-6713
FAX: (231)724-6768 Dear Scott and Danette:
Fire Dept. A request to establish an Industrial Development District as provided by Public Act 198
(231 )714-6792
MX: (231)724-6985 of the Michigan Public Acts 1974, as amended, has been filed for Streamline Tooling
Systems, Inc., 301 W. Laketon Avenue, Jvluskegon, Michigan 49441.
Income Tax
(231 )7!4-6770
FAX: (231)724-6768
A public hearing regarding the establishment of an Industrial Development District has
been set for Tuesday, February JO, 2004 at 5:30 p.m. at the Muskegon City Hall, 933
Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, at which time the applicant, the City Assessor, and
representatives of the affected taxing jurisdictions will have the opportunity to be heard.
Leisure Services
(lJI )724-6704
FAX: (231)724-1196
Information concerning the request can be obtained by calling the City of Muskegon at
~rr1°-r~i~.mf' (231) 724-6702.
FAX: (231)722-1214
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ·' COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
Sincerely,
Plannine-/Zoning
(ll1)7l4'670l _____ • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signature
FAX: (231)724-6790 item 4 if Restricted Delive,y is desired. D Agent
/
l
/I'
X~,'7-;%. /
/ '>'\L1,L{1'
-·- /~ . r· •
L- L.:· L, • Print your name and address on the reverse
so that w~ can return the card to you.
D Addressee
.
Lonna Anguilm
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
B, Received bJ..!!'1nted t!ame)
L i 5 ~... ,,, -~~ IC. Date ~D~~ivery
D. ls delivery address different from item 1?
/--- ;;;, ,,, ?1/
D Yes .,
Assistant Planner 1. Article Addressed to:
if YES, enter delivery address below: D No
Public Works Dept.
(ll1)7l4-4100 Sc.c:,t\---1-Da_ne..-\\e.. '2.he..nn::u,
I
FAX: (231)722-4188
::,:ce_~n\ ,nQ.I-CJD\;;~
Treasurer's Office
(lll )714-6710
FAX: (231)724-6768 2,c:-, \ \J:::. - ~e..-\-cc,
\'(\ c~):.,e0() n \ "\l. \ 3. Service Type
,l8\ Certified Mail D Express Mall
rrirrHt~!f& Dept.
FAX: (231)724-6768 D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise
~9l\~I D Insured Mail • C.D.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes
Waler Fiilntion
(231)724-4106
FAX: (231)755,5290 2, Article Number
City of Muskegon, 9 rr,ansfer from se,v;ce label) 7 Doc, 0 S2 a 0014 3 7 3 3 q I (0 7
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt nr-Pi:i1.n-:t.7.noo"
Date: February 2, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Ric Scott
RE: DNR Grant Application
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To authorize staff to re-submit grant applications to
the DNR Trust Fund for the purchase of the Consumers
Energy Property and to construct phase I of the
Lakeshore Trail We have applied for these grants each
of the last two years.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Consumers Energy Purchase - None
Lakeshore Trail construction - $425,000
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Leisure Services Board Recommends Approval
Affirmative Action
(23 1)724-6703
FAX: (23 1)722-1 2 14
C itv Manager
(231)724-6724
FAX: (23 1)722-12 14
Date: February 2, 2004
C ivil Service
<2311724-61 16
FAX: (23 1)724-4405
To : Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Ric Scott
C lerk
/23 1)724-6705
FAX: (231)724-4178 Re: DNR Grant Applications
I am requesting authorization to re-submit two grant
applications to the DNR Trust Fund . The application due
date is April 1 . Both of these applications were sent in
Computer Info. last year, but were turned down.
dmY4 1
-'6144
FAX: (23 1)722-4301 This will need to be a public hearing, as the grant
requires that a public notice be given to allow public
input.
The purchase of the Consume rs Energy property for a
~~r;m~%
FAX: (231)724-6768
sports complex has been discussed thoroughly recently.
The grant application would be for $1,000,000 with
$740,000 coming from the Trust Fund and the $260,000
~!iY)~lf!<>1n local match coming from Consumers Energy.
FAX: (23 1)724-6985
Income Tax
The construction of phase I of the Lakeshore Trail will
/231)724-6770
FAX: (23 1)724-6768 cost approximately $1,800,000. We have requested
funding for $1,000,000 from MOOT . The maximum amount of
funding through DNR is $375,000. Therefore I am
requesting that we apply for $425,000 from the DNR. The
Leisul'e Services
city will need to provide the remaining $425,000. Much
/231)724-6704
FAX: (23 1)724-11 96 of this can come from the Golf Course fund, but there
will need to be an additional $200,000 or so needed
i'lHi'f~ti48r beyond the golf course fund. This funding will not be
FAX: (231)722- 12 14 needed until 2006.
Plnnnim!/Zoning I would ask that you authorize the submittal of both
(23 1)724'- 6702
FAX: (231)724-6790 grant applications, and adopt the attached resolutions.
Thank you for your consideration.
Treasurer's Office
(231)724-6720
FAX: (231)724-6768
n'!/\'f2~!~~n~ Dept.
FAX: (23 1)724-6768
Water Filtration
(2311724-4106
FAX: (231)755-5290
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P._o. ~ox 536, Muskegon, MI 49443-0536
www.shorehnec1ty.com
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-18 ( b 1 )
MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMISSION OF GRANT APPLICATION FOR
THE CONSTUCTION OF PHASE I OF THE LAKESHORE TRAIL UNDER THE
MNRTF.
WHEREAS, the City of Muskegon wishes to construct phase I of the Lakeshore
Trail; and
WHEREAS, grant applications are now being received by the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources for Michigan Natural Resources
Trust Fund (MNRTF) grants, which will provide up to 75% funding
for the project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Commission of the City of
Muskegon approve the submission of the grant application to the
MN RTF for $500,000 for the construction of phase I of the
Lakeshore Trail; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City's $1,300,000 match will be provided,
and the City hereby commits itself to complete this project if the
grant application is approved.
Adopted this 10th day of February, 2004
AYES: Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter,
Davis
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
CERTIFICATION
2004-1 S(b 1)
This resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Commission, held on
February 10, 2004. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open
Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
2
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-18(b )
MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMISSION OF GRANT APPLICATION FOR
THE PURCHASE OF THE CONSUMER'S ENERGY PROPERTY UNDER THE
MNRTF.
WHEREAS, the City of Muskegon wishes to purchase approximately 56 acres of
property from Consumer's Energy for the development of a sports
complex; and
WHEREAS, the property has been appraised at $1,000,000,
WHEREAS, grant applications are now being received by the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources for Michigan Natural Resources
Trust Fund (MNRTF), which will provide up to 75% funding for the
project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Commission of the City of
Muskegon approve the submission of the grant application to the
MNRTF for $1,000,000 for the for the purchase of the Consumer's
Energy property,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City's $260,000 match will be provided,
and the City hereby commits itself to complete this purchase if the
grant application is approved.
Adopted this 10th day of February, 2004
AYES: Gawron, Larson, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter,
Davis
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Non e
CERTIFICATION
2004-18(b2)
This resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Commission, held on
February 10, 2004. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open
Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Gail A. Kundinger, MMC, City C
Date: February 10, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Public Hearing
Create Special Assessment District for:
Beidler Street, Laketon to Southern Ave.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of the Beidler st., Laketon to
Southern Ave., and to create the special assessment district and appoint two City
Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of
Assessors by adopting the attached resolution
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Resolution No. - - - - -
Resolution At First Hearing Creating Special Assessment District
For Beidler St., Laketon to Southern Ave.
Location and Description of Properties to be Assessed:
See Exhibit A attached to this resolution
RECITALS:
I. A hearing has been held on February 10, 2004 at 5:30 o'clock p.m. at the City
Commission Chambers. Notice was given by mail and publication as required by
law.
2. That estimates of costs of the project, a feasibility report and valuation and benefit
information are on file with the City and have been reviewed for this hearing.
3. At the hearing held February 10, 2004, there were ___% objections by the owners of
the property in the district registered at the hearing either in writing received before or at
the hearing or by owners or agents present at the hearing, and the Commission has
considered the advisability of proceeding with the project.
FINDINGS:
I. The City Commission has examined the estimates of cost to construct the project
including all assessable expenses and determines them to be reasonable.
2. The City Commission has considered the value of the property to be assessed and the
value of the benefit to be received by each property proposed to be assessed in the district
after the improvements have been made. The City Commission determines that the
assessments of costs of the City project will enhance the value of the properties to be
assessed in an amount at least equivalent to the assessment and that the improvement
thereby constitutes a benefit to the property.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
I. The City Commission hereby declares a special assessment district to include the
property set forth in Exhibit A attached to this resolution.
2. The City Commission determines to proceed with the improvements as set forth in the
feasibility study and estimates of costs, and directs the City Engineer to proceed with
project design, preparation of specifications and the bidding process. If appropriate and
if bonds are to be sold for the purposes of financing the improvements, the Finance
Department shall prepare plans for financing including submission of application to the
Michigan Department of Treasury and the beginning of bond proceedings.
3. The City Commission hereby appoints a Board of Assessors consisting of City
Commissioners-------------~ and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
and the City Assessor who are hereby directed lo prepare an assessment roll.
Assessments shall be made upon front foot basis.
4. Based on the City's Special Assessment policy and preliminary estimates it is expected
that approximately 25.17% of the cost of the street improvement will be paid by special
assessments.
5. Upon submission of the special assessment roll, the City staff is hereby directed to notify
all owners and persons interested in properties to be assessed of the hearing at which the
City Commission will consider confirmation of the special assessment roll.
This resolution adopted.
Ayes _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Nays _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10, 2004.
The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of
Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk
EXHIBIT A
Beidler Street, Laketon to Southern Ave.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
All properties abutting that section of Beidler Street, Laketon to Southern Avc.
LOCATION MAP
_J L
GRAND AVE.
,_
(/J
f
NO SCALE
SOUTHERN A VE.
FOREST AVE.
,-:
(/J
PROJECT L CATION Lu
a
'<
G
,-: a:'
:;,: (/J
a
a :,..
Vi :,..
:SC a:: DALE AVE ~
a r5
:r: w
(/J
LARCH AVE
LAKETON AVE
ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY
For
Beidler Street, Laketon to Sonthcrn Ave.
The reconstruction of Beidler street between Laketon & Southern, see attached exhibit, was
initiated by the City due lo the conditions of the pavement and underground utilities. The
existing pavement has deteriorated to a level where, we believe, a total reconstruction is
necessary. This section of road has not had, to the best of our records, any major work since it's
resurfacing back in 1929 and has an average Pavement Condition Index of around 40. and as a
result of the lack of major work, most of the existing curbs are terrible shape and the drainage
facilities are in need of upgrade. The improvements being proposed, reconstruction, consist of
following;
1. Complete removal of existing pavement and replace with a new street section that would
include curb & gutter of and a proposed width of 32' back to back. The proposed width is
about a two foot wider than existing to accommodate the on street parking along one side of
the street.
2. spot repairs on the existing sanitary sewer main
3. Replace existing watermain along with water services
A memo from the Assessor's office, which addresses the appraisal and benefit information, is
attached.
The preliminary cost estimate for the work associated with paving is approximately $307,000
with the length of the project being approximately 1600 lineal feet (project length) or 2198 of
assessable footage. This translates into an estimated improvement cost of $140 per assessable
foot. The assessment figure will be at a cost not to exceed $35.15 per assessable foot as
established in the 2004 Special Assessment for this type of improvement
MUSKEGON COUNTY
M C H G A N
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
Paul T. Baade, Chair
District 10
Bill Gill, Vice-Chair
District 8 January 28, 2004
Douglas A. Bennett Mohammed Al-Shatel, City Engineer
District? City of Muskegon
933 Terrace Street
Charles L. Buzzell
District 2 Muskegon, MI 49443
James J. Derezinski Mr. Al-Shale!:
District 4
In accordance with your request, I have examined the proposed special assessment
Ma!Vin R. Engle district entailing the reconstruction of Beidler Street between W Laketon Avenue and
District 5 Southern Avenue. The purpose of this analysis is to document the reasonableness of
Louis A. McMurray
this special assessment district by identifying and quantifying any accrued benefits. It
District 9 is subject to the normal governmental restrictions of escheat, taxation, police power
and eminent domain. The effective date is January 28, 2004.
Robert Scolnik
District 11 In conclusion, it is my opinion that the special assessment amounts justly and
reasonably represents the accrued benefits to the properties encompassed by this
I. John Snider II
District3 project. The amounts reflect the sum of the innnediate estimated value enhancement
and the intrinsic value that will accrue from an overall increase in property values due
Nancy A. Waters to an improved quality of life created by the proposed project. As previously
District 6
presented, the proposed special assessment district encompasses primarily residential
Stephen R. Wisniewski properties. The front foot rate of$35.15 for the reconstruction of the above
District 1 mentioned project area appears reasonable in light of an analysis that indicates a
possible enhancement of $36.40. The conclusions are based upon the data presented
within this limited analysis in restricted fonnat, and on supporting information in my
files.
Sincerely,
J ~L \{_,,'._ C\. C¾...;_,)vvG
Vicki A Emery, CMAE 3
Senior Appraiser
EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT • 173 E. APPLE AVE., BUILDll~G C • MUSKEGON, Ml 49442
(2J 1) 724 -G386 • FAX (231) 724-1129
TTY (231) 722-4103 • An EEO I ADA I AA Employer
recycled paper
January 30, 2004
Dear :OWNERS NAME
OWNERS ADDRESS
OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE, OWNERS ZIPCODE 1
The City of Muskegon is asking for your support for improvement of the street adjoining your
property located at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET.
The City of Muskegon believes that by making the proposed street improvements you will
have less road noise, dust, and wear and tear on your vehicle. In addition, street
improvements provide easier access for delivery of services such as snow plowing, mail
delivery, and bus service.
Called a special assessment district, the largest percentage of the proposed street
improvement will be paid for by the City of Muskegon (via local funds and or grants); however,
it will be necessary for you to cover a share of the cost (which you can spread over a period of
ten years) based on the amount of property you own bordering the street. A description of the
project, including the associated cost to you and the City, is located in the documents
attached to this letter.
While the City of Muskegon believes that the proposed improvements will result in a safer and
cleaner street while adding curb appeal to your property, you do have the right to ask further
questions, decline, or protest participation in this particular project. Please carefully review the
enclosed materials and call the City's Engineering Department at 724-6707 or your ward
commissioner if you require more information.
A public hearing is also scheduled for this project on FEBRUARY 10, 2004. If you attend this
public hearing you will be given an opportunity to present your questions and potential
concerns on the proposed special assessment district to the commission.
Also located in this packet of materials is a Special Assessment Hearing Response Card. If
mailed back to the City of Muskegon City Clerk's Office before the scheduled public hearing
your vote will be added to the tabulation of votes during the public hearing. If you do not send
in this form your vote counts as "in favor" of the project.
Thank you for your participation in improving the quality of life in the Muskegon community.
January 30, 2004
OWNERS NAME
OWNERS ADDRESS
OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE OWNERS ZIPCODE 1
Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX: at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET
NOTICE OF HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Dear Property Owner:
The Muskegon City Commission is considering whether or not to create a special
assessment district which would assess your property for the following paving project:
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
The proposed special assessment district will be located as follows:
All parcels abutting Beidler St. from Laketon Ave .. to Southern Ave.
It is proposed that a portion of the above improvement will be paid by special
assessment against properties in the aforementioned district. Following are conditions
of the proposed special assessment which are important to you.
Public Hearings
An initial public hearing to consider the creation of a special assessment district will be
held at the City of Muskegon City Commission Chambers on FEBRUARY 10, 2004 at
5:30 P.M. You are encouraged to appear at this hearing, either in person, by agent or
in writing to express your opinion, approval, or objection concerning the proposed
special assessment. We are enclosing a Hearing Response Card for you to indicate
your agreement or opposition to the special assessment. This card includes the
property identification and description, assessable footage per City policy, and the
estimated cost of the assessment. You may also appear, as above, in lieu of, or in
addition to mailing your response card to the City Clerk. Written objections or
appearances must be made at or prior to the hearing. NOTE: THE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT WILL BE CREATED OR NULLIFIED AT THIS HEARING. IT IS
IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO COMMENT AT THIS HEARING IF YOU WANT YOUR
OPINION COUNTED FOR THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.
A second public hearing will be held, if the district is created, to confirm the special
assessment roll after the project is completed. You will be mailed a separate notice for
the second hearing. At this second hearing the special assessment costs will be spread
on the affected properties accordingly. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU
HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT AGAINST YOUR
PARCEL EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THIS HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED AT THE SECOND HEARING, YOU WILL HAVE
THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE ROLL TO FILE A
WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER,
UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THE INITIAL HEARING OR AT THE SECOND HEARING
CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY AGENT, OR IN WRITING
BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX
TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST.
By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the properties to be assessed
shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall
not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its
members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement.
Estimated Costs
The total estimated cost of the street portion of the project is $307,000.00
of which approximately 25.17% ($77,259.70) will be paid by special assessment to
property owners. Your property's estimated share of the special assessment is shown
on the attached hearing response card. The remaining costs will be paid by the City.
The street assessment, which covers improvements to the roadway, may be paid in
installments over a period of up to ten (10) years. Any work on drive approaches or
sidewalks will be assessed to the property at actual contract prices and these costs may
also be paid in installments over ten (10) years. Please note this work is in addition to
the street special assessment.
Please refer to the enclosed sheet entitled Special Assessment Payment Options for
more information on the payment options and financial assistance programs available.
I urge you to return the enclosed hearing response card indicating your preference and
to attend the scheduled public hearing. Your views are important to the City and to your
neighbors. Additional information, including preliminary project plans and cost
estimates is available in the Engineering Department located on the second floor of City
Hall. Regular business hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday
except holidays.
Sincerely,
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1577
Project Title: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET
Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX
Assessable Frontage: $77.25 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,715.34
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
BLK 455
LOTS 9-10
Your vote COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR • I AM OPPOSED •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
---------- CoOwner/Spouse ------------
Signature Signature
Address Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
H-1577 - BEIDLER ST. LAKETON AVE. to SOUTHERN AVE.
PROPERTY OWNER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TABULATION
EsEI PERCENTAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS- 43
FOR OPPOSE
LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET
TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE 2198.00 ...... 43 1560 BEIDLER 24-205-433-0001-00 41.25
21 1561 BEIDLER 24-205-434-0008-00 82,50
FRONT FEET OPPOSED 1646.75 .Jk.-92% '1 'i,.. (o (_ 20 1573 SEIDLER 24-205-434-0009..QO 82.50
42 1574 BEIDLER 24-205-433-0002..QO 82.50
RESPONDING FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 0.00 0.00% 18 1593 BEIDLER 24-205-434-0011-00 40.00
38 1600 BEIDLER 24-205-433-0019-00 41.25
NOT RESPONDING - FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 551.25 25.08% 17 1607 BEIDLER 24-205-434-0012-10 47.50
37 1608 BEIDLER 24-205-433-0019-10 41.25
TOTAL FRONT FEET lN FAVOR 551.25 25.08% 36 1624 BEIDLER 24-205-436-0001-00 4i.25
35 1632 BEIDLER 24-205-436-0002-00 41.25
16 1635 BEIDLER 24-205-435-0008-00 55.00
15 1641 BEIDLER 24-205-435-0009-00 55.00
14 1651 BEIDLER 24-205-435-0010-00 35.00
13 1657 BEIDLER 24-205-435-0011-00 75.00
31 1664 BEIDLER 24-205-436-0017-10 40.00
11 1687 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0006-00 40.00
10 1693 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0006-10 40.00
9 1699 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0006-20 40.00
8 1705 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0009-00 45,00
7 1715 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0010-00 40.00
27 1720 BEIDLER 24-205-453-0015-10 40.00
V1
6 1721 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0010-10 42.00
'!;O
,.,
~
'1
~
"·co
,'l 0
26
5
1724
1727
BEIDLER
BEIDLER
24-205-453-0015-20
24-205-454-0010-20
40.00
42.00
?
s 2i> ~
:'-
C
e 4 1733 BEIDLER 24-205-454-0010-30 41.00
c,- 0
0
25 1736 BE!DLER 24-205-453-0015-3 40.00
I
t- """'
~.k.. \ 24 1752 BEIDLER 24-205-456-0001-00 50.00
-
~ 3 1755 BEIDLER 24-205-455-0008-00 41.25
_,I
~
1=(
,._<)
23
2
1766
1769
BEIDLER
BEIDLER
24-205-456-0001 _, 0
24-205-455-0008-10
65.00
82.50
' ~ 22 1780 BEIDLER 24-205-456-0016-00 79.50
"' -,
i ·-c:,;
-~
;-
"s ·=
,,
=()
b ~ ~
1 1785 BEIDLER 24-205-455-0009-00 77.25
i 1
~ j 0.00 1490.00
<) '
_""( ;;'\
-
TOi:ALS
~ d ~, <::J
<>'.
=
"'
?
c;D
] J
v/J (\ .g
=cl "\
-
0
"''
-"'
13
r' -:.,
_:,v
-1 ~
~ <;::,
-5. r G
'v
i""\
~
/
cl
0 -./
c::::i
- i 3
i{ H
r :z_
TABULATED AS OF: 04:52 PM
{ ,-\
WI
-.__) '
e
'. ""I
0
"
~
0 2/10/20044:52 PMTABULATION OF THE RESPONSES TO THE SP. ASS. HEARING ON BEIDLER
CITY OF MUSKEGON
STREET- H-1577
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE ..
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Note: You may receive this application several times -Ifyou have already applied, please discard.
Dear Resident:
The City of Muskegon has selected the street abutting your property for repairs. To assist homeowners, who
may have difficulty paying the cost of street repairs, the City offers assessment waivers through the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for eligible households and families. If you meet the CDBG
program q4alifications, the City may pay the street assessment for you to the extent that funds are available.
Application Requirements:
✓ Applicants must submit proof that their total household income does not exceed 65% of Area Median
Income (see chart below); Proof of income may include copies of Wage & Tax Statement (W-2's) from the year
2003, pension or other benefit checks, bank statements for direct deposits or agency statements for all household
mcome.
2002
165% MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME CHART I
FAMILY SIZE INCOME LIMIT
1 $27,885
2 31,850
3 35,880
4 39,845
5 43,030
6 46,326
7 49,400
8 52,585
For each extra, add 3,185
✓ Applicants must submit proof that they both own and occupy property at the time of application; Land
Contract purchasers must obtain approval of titleholder prior to receiving assistance. Proof of ownership should be
a deed, mortgage, or land contract; proof of occupancy can be a copy of a driver's license or other official
document showing both your name and address.
✓ Applicants must submit proof of current property insurance.
Please complete the first four (4) sections of the application on the reverse side of this notice, and return it, along with
suppmiing documentation, to: City of Muskegon
Community & Neighborhood Services
933 Terrace Street, 2nd Floor
Muskegon,MI49440
For further information, please contact this office by calling 724-6717, weekdays from 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
171e City reserves the right to ver(fji all application information, and to reject any applications that containfals{fied injbrmation or insufficient
doc1rmentation.
Special Assessment Payment Options
Property owners in the City of Muskegon who are being specially assessed for street, sidewalk or other public
improvements may pay their assessment in the following ways:
I. Lump Sum Payment in Full
Assessments may be paid in full within sixty (60) days of the confirmation of the special assessment roll
without interest.
II. Installment Payments
Assessments not paid within the first sixty (60) days may be paid in installments over several years as follows:
Street and Alley Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments. For example, if the
amount of your assessment is $850.00, you will be billed $85.00 per year plus applicable interest as
described below.
Driveway, Sidewalk, and Approach Assessments- Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments
plus applicable interest as described below.
Interest- Simple interest is charged at the rate of 5.00% per year unless the City has borrowed money
to complete the project for which you are assessed and has pledged you assessments for repayment of
the borrowed money. In such cases, the interest you are charged is equal to the interest rate the City
must pay on the borrowed money plus 1.00%.
Ill. Special Assessment Deferral (Low Income Seniors and Disabled Persons)
To qualify for a special assessment deferral you or your spouse (if jointly owned) must:
• Be 65 years or older or be totally or permanently disabled.
• Have been a Michigan resident for five (5) years or more and have owned and occupied the homestead
being assessed for five (5) years or more.
• Be a citizen of the U.S.
• Have a total household income not in excess of $16,823.00
• Have a special assessment of $300.00 or more.
Under this program the State of Michigan will pay the entire balance owing of the special assessment,
including delinquent, current, and further installments. At the time of payment a lien will be recorded on your
property in favor of the State of Michigan. Repayment to the State must be made at the time the property is
sold or transferred or after the death of the owner(s). During the time the special assessment is deferred
interest is accrued at the rate of 6.00% per year.
IV. Further Information About the Above Programs
Further information about any of the above payment options may be obtained by calling either the City
Assessor's Office at 724-6708 or the City Treasurer's Office at 724-6720. Applications may be obtained at
the Muskegon County Equalization Office in the Muskegon County building or City of Muskegon Assessor's
Office in City Hall.
V. Additional Special Assessment Payment Assistance
Qualified low and moderate income homeowners who are being assessed may be eligible for payment
assistance through the City of Muskegon Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Assistance
from this program will be available to the extent that funds are available. To obtain further information and
determine whether you are eligible, contact the Community and Neighborhood Services Department at
724-6717.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DJSTRICTS
IN AN EFFORT TOWARDS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT, the Muskegon City Commission is
proposing that special assessment districts be created for the following projects:
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
AND
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
The specific locations of the special assessment districts and the prope,ties proposed to be assessed are:
All parcels abutting Beidler St. from Laketon Ave. to Southern Ave.
All parcels abutting McCracken St. from Sherman Blvd. to Lakeshore Dr.
And
All parcels abutting Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln St. to Beach St.
The City Commission proposes that the City and property owners by means of special assessments will
share the cost of improvement. You may examine preliminary plans and cost estimates in the City Hall's
Engineering Depaitment during regular business hours - between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on weekdays,
except holidays.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE MUSKEGON CITY
COMMISSION CHAMBERS ON FEBRUARY Ill, 2()/14 AT 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M
PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT
EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THE HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
ROLL IS CONFIRMED (AT A LATER HEARING) YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF THE ROLL'S CONFIRMATION TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE
MICI-IIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THIS HEARING
OR AT THE HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY YOUR AGENT OR
REPRESENTATIVE, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO
APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST.
By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the property to be assessed shall object to the
assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission
determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the
improvement.
PUBLISH: January 31, 2004 Gail Kundinger, City Clerk
ADA POLICY
The City will provide necessary appropriate auxiliary aids and services, for example, signers for the hearing
impaired, audiotapes for the visually impaired, etc., for disabled persons who want to attend the meeting, upon
twenty-four hours notice to the City. Contact:
Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Ml 49440
(231) 724-6705 or TDD (231) 724-6773
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
) ss
COUNTY OF MUSKEGON )
TO CREATE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FOLLOWING:
Beidler St., Laketon Ave. to Southern Ave.
THE DEPONENT SAYS THAT THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED UPON
EACH OWNER OF OR PARTY IN INTEREST IN PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED IN
THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHOSE NAME APPEARS UPON THE
LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON BY
MAILING SUCH NOTICE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE BY FIRST CLASS UNITED
STATES MAIL, WITH POSTAGE PREPAID, ADDRESSED TO EACH SUCH
OWNER OR PARTY IN INTEREST AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON SAID LAST
TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS BY DEPOSITING THEM IN AN OFFICIAL
UNITED STATES MAIL RECEPTACLE ON THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2004.
GAIL A. KUNDINGER, CITY CLERK
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
_ _ _ DAY OF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2004.
NOTARY PUBLIC, MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT H 1577
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
1 BOGNER DALE R/PATRICIA A ASSESSABLE FEET: 77.25
24-205-455-0009-00 2254 BLUFFTON COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1785. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,715.34 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.5146
2 WINICK! EDWARD/JOANN ASSESSABLE FEET: 82.5
24-205-455-0008-10 1826 CROWLEY ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1769. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,899.ss 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.7534
3 WINICK! EDWARD/JOANN ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-455-0008-00 1826 CROWLEY ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1755. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
4 WACKERLE MARC A/GINA M ASSESSABLE FEET: 41
24-205-454-0010-30 4922 MCARTHUR RD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1733. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49442 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,441.15 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8653
5 MILLS DAVID ASSESSABLE FEET: 42
24-205-454-0010-20 1727 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1727. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,476.30 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9108
6 MILLS DAVID ASSESSABLE FEET: 42
24-205-454-0010-10 1727 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1721. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,476.30 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9108
7 TICE GREG A/DAWN M ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-454-0010-00 1715 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1715. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
1/30/2004 Page 1 of 7
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
8 HANSON RUSSELL ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24-205-454-0009-00 1705 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1705. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.0473
9 WRIGHT MICHAEL ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-454-0006-20 1699 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1699. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441-236 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
10 KUHAREVICZ SANDRA ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-454-0006-10 1693 BEIDLER COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1693. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
11 JONES ERICA ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-454-0006-00 1687 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1687. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
12 BATKAALAN M ASSESSABLE FEET: 55
24-205-435-0012-00 1669 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1669. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,933.25 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.5023
13 CASTANON GREGORIO/MARIA ASSESSABLE FEET: 75
24-205-435-0011-00 1657 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1657. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441-481 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,636.25 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.4122
14 WOTLI DAVID H ASSESSABLE FEET: 35
24-205-435-0010-00 1724 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1651. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,230.25 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.5924
1/30/2004 Page 2 of 7
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
15 BOSSE STEVEN/FERGUSON JE ASSESSABLE FEET: 55
24-205-435-0009-00 1641 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1641. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,933.25 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.5023
16 1635 BEIDLER LLC ASSESSABLE FEET: 55
24-205-435-0008-00 1635 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1635. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,933.25 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.5023
17 SISSON DALEE ASSESSABLE FEET: 47.5
24-205-434-0012-10 1607 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1607. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,669.63 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.1611
18 FAIRBANKS LARRY O/SANDRA ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-434-0011-00 16082 ROBBINS RD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1593. BEIDLER ST GRAND HAVEN Ml 49417 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
19 ANDERSON RUSSELL J ASSESSABLE FEET: 30
24-205-434-0010-00 1589 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1589. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,054_50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3649
20 KAMP THOMAS R ASSESSABLE FEET: 82.5
24-205-434-0009-00 17550 WOODLAND LN COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1573. BEIDLER ST NUNICA Ml 49448 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,899.88 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.7534
21 BEALL WILLIAM J ASSESSABLE FEET: 82.5
24-205-434-0008-00 4446 BIRCHWOOD CT COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1561. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,899.88 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.7534
1/30/2004 Page 3 of 7
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
22 ANDERSON CLARENCE II ASSESSABLE FEET: 79.5
24-205-456-0016-00 3949 HENRY COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1780. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,794.43 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.6169
23 WINICKI EDWARD/JOANN REVO ASSESSABLE FEET: 65
24-205-456-0001-10 1769 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1766. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2.2s4.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.9572
24 LAPINSKI THEODORE M ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-205-456-0001-00 4635 ROOD RD. COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1752. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2748
25 HAWKINS WILLARD/HAWKINS W ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-453-0015-30 1736 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1736. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
26 SANFORD KENNETH ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-453-0015-20 1724 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1724. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
27 SANFORD KENNETH ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-453-0015-10 2035 HENRY ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1720. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441-304 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: j $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
28 JACKSON DINA GONZALEZ/EER ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24-205-453-0015-00 1714 BEIDLER ST. COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1714. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.0473
1/30/2004 Page 4 of 7
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
29 DELONG ROBERT E ASSESSABLE FEET: 90
24-205-453-0001-00 711 W DALE AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 711.0 W DALE AVE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,163.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.0946
30 CITY OF MUSKEGON ASSESSABLE FEET: 85
24-205-436-0017-20 933 TERRACE ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1668. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49442 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,987.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.8672
31 0 CONNOR DONNA M TRUST ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-436-0017-10 1721 FRANKLIN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1664. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
32 HERSHEY JOSEPH F ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-205-436-0017-00 1650 BEIDLER COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1650. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8198
33 MULLINS JOHN D ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-436-0004-00 1978 NEVADA ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1644. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441-294 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
34 SECORD HERMAN ET AL ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-436-0003-00 1636 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1636. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
35 SECORD HERMAN ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-436-0002-00 1632 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1632. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
1/30/2004 Page 5 of 7
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
36 SECORD CHARLES P ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-436-0001-00 1624 BEIDLER COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1624. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P 0. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
37 NELSON COMMUNITY ASSOCIA ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-433-0019-10 P.O. BOX 1638 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1608. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49443-943 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
38 ADAMS IRAD ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-433-0019-00 1600 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1600. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P 0. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
39 BROCKMYRE DAVID ET AL ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-433-0020-00 17753 168TH AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1596. BEIDLER ST SPRING LAKE Ml 49456 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
40 JP MORGAN BANK ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-433-0021-00 4708 MERCHANTILE DR N COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1590. BEIDLER ST FORT WORTH TX 76137 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
41 PRICE SHELLY ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-433-0004-00 1580 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1580. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
42 PHINNEY WENDY S/PHINNEY H ASSESSABLE FEET: 82.5
24-205-433-0002-00 1574 BEIDLER ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1574. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,899.88 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.7534
1/30/2004 Page 6 of 7
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
43 LUNA JOSE L ASSESSABLE FEET: 41.25
24-205-433-0001-00 1560 BEIDLER COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1560. BEIDLER ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,449.94 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8767
SUM OF ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE: 2198.00 SUM OF ESTIMATED P.O. COST: $77,259.70 I
TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE PARCELS 43.00
1/30/2004 Page 7 of 7
,.-_-__ ._. ''
".'·'.·- ;··>;
·. •' ' . SF>ECIALA~SESSMENT < .' . .·. ·.....·· .·•. ·,• , '.
. , , · . , , HEARING RESPONSE CARD • , ,,
NO RE$PONSE, COUNTS AS ''IN FAVOR" Of PROJECT-To have.your vote count, please
.: · . · Return This Gard By' F8BRIJARY; 10, 2004, · __ • · · . · · ·· · :
...' "' ;· i::rojedfNuh)be~;,:c;;, H1577 ;:, _:.
::;?tt•:;,f tit(,::' .>>i;) •?/'., .{,:,l:r:· :·,·~: ' ;• ;'.: ; ' '·.' :' '. :;' '
'. ,.P,rpjectJfltJE1: ,' , ' BE_IDLER ST.: LAKETON A,'?E: ,JO S9l)THERN AVE,, - , ·, ,,.;, .:,· •. _·;
f_
..
,_._,_,,.
·•''•,;o:,YT"·-~;.
}.'-)t/{'.-
,_ · _c_':;;c·.;'c
' , .. , l't , , • ., 't,
,--;"c·
i:,\<
r, 0
' ';c',•:<f/t
( :-/t,;_;.:-;<:
' • ,c, •¥00 DO NOT SENCll IN THIS• t;;ORM Y.Qt,18:V E COW . ' ''I 'FAVOtf''()li ". ,,, < .' .
~/:· - ~'.•,'.:'• ,~r~~:ii~tri;!tlihf C • c/< ,,c: c•• ; >' ;, ' ' :: , , . • • • i,"':::
i:ri~( '
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by maii, simply fold on Hie dotted iint::s so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2596 W SHERMAN BLVD
Parcel Number 24-205-686-0008-00
Assessab!e Frontage: $105.50 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,708.33
Property Description Cit>{ C\etl'-5 Ottice
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOTS 8 AND 9 BLK 686
ANDS 1/2 OF ADJ VAC ALLEY ABUTTING SD LOTS
Your vote COUNTS!
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED 0'
Owaec ~4:;c,owae</Spoose JP'[/,11/o,
Signature _ ____...._....,,.,_______
__ Signature
Address ..?_,-?4 Ju ~ .:9u'rv14r1. B)vli Address $'{6 le). SJ?r>r-
• •.::.,,.'if;_·•t: .t.,-r... ,! '.'' • ' ,I,;• •,
"·t·ST> : · ' :: ,:/,..,, ·. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
,;,ri:,;.,. . . . , HEARING RESPONSE CARD .
R~~fQNSl:.C(?Uf'.:JTSAS "IN FAVOR'',9FPROJECT-To have your vote count, please
. . , . . :c;• i /;}i',:k'•>;: •; ~-~IurnJtjis C~rd By, fE!3RUARY 10, 2004 . ·· ·
:-.(/;·'.:(:.frb).~-~i~i1rn~it:'.ttL:t:1}q77 •·. . :· ·· ·.·• . .. .
s,,.•· ·cc'•:ProjectTitle~ /::',;'.,i/J3~1pLE~.ST,,.LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
f ik: ';{J!!: ~rtlt:~t~":~:~:~ t: ·• · ··•.· •· . ·.··
i:(.j:,)•:\\:lfy9y_W}.Sh to h_ave youry;rit\env,ote h1clud~_d a~p;,rt of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
;;{ {,.·_;, )l)e};1ty Comm,ss,on forJhe :ichedul~q pybhc hearing, please return this card by the date
:,\'{/:.;;,
1
111d(ca,ted ;above. To .use tt1.isrespQnse carq please Indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
,)' \):::/.Jl)i(speicial asses.sment project; sign 'theJorm a_nd retllrn it to the City Clerk's Office. To
; ,;:::: ','Ft, ',,fetyrn this card by mail; simply fold on 111.f dotted lines so Iha oddrese on th\! reverse 1<irli:i is
;' fr:"\:,, show,ng. Be sure to seal a the.Jorm·with sma.11
piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
':iN,:!/C','yo(J bo NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR'' OF
i.J,':?,•;i PROJECT, ' '/ : '\ ,< :.· . '',' .; . ' . '
,-}:' '.'.·:c ' •: Assessment Information • · . ;;,! ·:
>-k:;c··.<.·:::_::_·,.:. :\.;.,_ ·..--:-\::::·: :,-.-· t·-· · . · RECEIVED
::,>.•.\ ,: Property Address: · · , 1721 BEIDLER ST CITY OF MUSKEGON
(i[j;'.tt{j:;i}pa~c;{H~~;er ...... i ... , 24-205-454-0010-10
·•
FEB 1 0 2004
,,.,,::. •' "-<'. 1
Assessable Frontage· . ·,.·,,.·· .42 Feet ··,
\:(,r(;\;c{ ::·•. ' .•,;· :·,,.,r,!;; •.\, '; ' ,, ,. '•,· ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
;,;• :sx:: E~ti/11ated Front Foot Cosf<-,~\\(::·,.;:.>.,:.
~;_'.'.;_-.::\1/}\/\/·;·:.;·,. _;•/"\1··· ,. ,,..,,,•i·· ,'· , .
1
·. $35.15.•.
:iffi/:" :.·..., . -: >>·,.'.•\;'
1 per'foot 4\ (_yt,
l
','> .·., .... ·-:· ::) . ;, ·:_:,.
<:} '\)' .ESTIMATED JC)TAL COST: ;:\ ,: . ,· : $1,476,30
t!tlitif~~j~~{l~~!J~",.\~~~ :·· .·
:,•i'.! ,•;.:y,:;~LY47Fr'OFN82F1LOTS10&11 .. :,·,•·:.ii'.,.•/ ,.,,,,.,, ·'
- •I. ".: f.
l~Bit~lii:{~{!ift~*~~~ii,tsb9Nrsr- . ··=--~~---~-----~~
::.:;r::,\\.,i'j,iJ~:;,~ ~ote either in i.{Jij/~/ opposed ~o tt:,e $pecial Assessmerit StreetPaving Project.
~l~ct6~,;~;l?
{\i
~K~[lfi!:';JJWL;c ~["{,i-:'
~!ti~t;; ;~,.f)a,C,-l6L,,' >·· ·-·~
.. jxL I AM OPPOSED
t1;~flti,i .. .til;EZPi:T ;:;:.~ -----------
CoOwn6r/Spol.lse ·
(;·_{-\·.\::_>:,'\_·/<./t;{'\/•:.; · ,. _. · ,···Y•·--· ~ ·:;.= ,··..,, ·,;•·:, ·,_ . .;·· ,, ·: ·•.• · .,...
;:,;; '·:\':; \'Thank you fo( taking 1,heJime to vote on thlS 11]1pOrtant issue. ' . 6
. , ·r .•. ,~ .. ,. ...... ,.
,_.
>c\1r ;c.,,r,rf'.k ,Ye~
0
;:, i:'.~i~f:.i~~~T~~,t'2sJP~~i~~~lR[j(; .: •,,i·,. . ;r•?i?t;H ,
. . . . .'.·.,·;· · · · · ·. .·•.·•.·•··.·.·.•··.••;:.Ni R···•.E·$.rON.·t.E
. •·.•.•···•.···.c·••·<·.p·········LJ ...T.·•.·.··.··.s·.A.•······•.··.•..S
. . ·.•·N.· . ....·.•.·.o
..•. .•. . .•.•.: ·.·.'·•·N· · · · · · F·)·•· .· · .·.A.•v.·.· .• ·.·.·.•··R
. ·•···•.·.·.·.1.·...·.•...•..•. JpCT,.··.T.•.·.·.·.·.•.o.· · · ·.I.·.h•.a.·.·.v.•·. .·.e.• . ••.•.·.•···your\1ot.e··countpple~!:!j'··
. . >···.
.() P.·.•.•·.·.•.R.·•.·•····.0
F.·.·.•······...... ...
:<'./tiI¾,t:?_::~:tw:1~l\t{
,-,_-· .''-
!J:,r!~ ~~~,s~,il~i1,ifi~,.;r , :·:;:'!(. j~.
0
JW• .. ···y ... , ..c')
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
f~eturn This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1577
Project Tifie: BEIDLER ST, LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card cy rnaii, simply ioid on the dotted iir1c,s so ii 1e adu1 e5s 01·, ti..,e reve1·se s;ds :s
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
RECEIVED
FEB OCl ·1nn1,
City Clerks Office
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
BLK 435
LOT 10
You~ vote COUNTS 1
. •
Please ,ate elthec lo f°'cc ot opposed to the Special Assessmeot Stteet P"P(T't
I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED
· Owner
s_._.-_''"' ""
Address
@±~
2___..________
___
·
.,.,,:;.'--'1----....,..----- CoOwner/Spouse
Slgoam - - - - - - - - - - - -
Address
14
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
·. HEARING RESPONSE CARD
);r,iQ
.•·-•. RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count,
••, ' ' ' . ' -_ . . .
please
j;ctlf,N\'tL. ,, ,. . ___ ·. Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
,/:CiProJect Nllmber: . H 1577
i'.~~;Rigif~fJitle;: , . ~EIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
1
' ;(,/}Rf?i~?tDe~criplion .·. · RECONSTRUCTION
·it~i::~:r .. ..... . •.. .. . . ..· ... . ..•.... ..
'\\){you, vvish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded le;>,
, JJl'J.e ;city Commission forthe scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the.date · ·_
lct;jir!gJi;ated above. To use this. response ,card please indicate whether you Oppose orFayor
''1Z%i(tfifspElcial assessmeritproject, sign the fpnnandJeluff) it I<> the City Clerk'!i ,Office/Jo_,.
()ireturn
•1•f,.,.", •_ •
I_'•
this Cc!rd by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address orHhe reverse side
. ,;, • ,', .,•, ' ', _' . • • • ,' ;• , , • ' . ·, , ' ·:' , _' • "., • •C , , •;,_', ' '. ,:, ,.
is
,.' '"'.••'
j\~tiowing. _. Be sure .to seal the_ form with. a small_ piece· of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF .\ ·•.·
•!:Ypqoo NQTSEND INTHIS FORM YOURVOTECOUNTSAS "IN FAVOR"OF ..... ,.·
];\"QJECT. ;. <
,)k~,f~.~~sment ln~ormation
b I\'-l (:._ fv, I L I
~- .S
RECEIVED
FtB (\ O ';liO!t
\ City Clerks Office
L---~~-~~•"-- .
J,CIJYOFMUSKEGON
' E\!ISED.PLAT OF .1903
lKA35.,;> ,:
'or;10:"
.. SPECIALASSESSMENT
.HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPON~ECOUNTS AS "IN FAVOR'' OF PROJECT-To hc1ve your vote count, please
. · Return This Card By FEl3RUARY 10, 2004
. Project Number: ·.. • H 11577 . RECEiVED
-·. - _, '.
· .· Pro)!:lctTitle: · · · .sE10L.ERsr,,tAKEToNAVE. tosollrHER.N.Av
FEB 09 200~ .
. Project[:>esqripUon . REC.Q~STRUcn:16N/ '.qJtyClerksOffioo .
.If yolJ···\/1/iSh.·to havJy6tJr'N~itten.~6(eiric!Ucled 1s. partofthe •. tabulation··of·.votes forvvard e.d.·to ..
the City..COIT1!71iS~ion forthe schedµled)pupli<:: hearir:ig,please returr:i this card by the date ....
. indicaJed. a.boye./To.yse thi{resporn,e casclpl~as.e.iildicatewhetheryou.Oppose Favor. or
tffo> sp§cia.la~:,e§~JTJEJl)tprojefl, signJhe.fprJTJ ·ahd.r!:llWnjt tothe C:ityClerk'S Offipe.·.• To. ./.. ·
rEJll.lrn this <::a.rd ~y rnail, sirnpfyfpldpn thf.dotte.dJ.ines so the adclress9n•lh$ . revEip,El :,iqe· is
showing. Be S\)reto seal u,¢.
forrnwith fl. small piece ot tape or staple pripr to JTJa Uir:ig, .1 F.• ·• ·
YOU.DONOTSEND.IN THISFORM•YOURVOTECOUNTSAS"IN FAVOR''.OF
~~s~~~grrit1AiorrhatiOr1····.· . < t('.}. St/···· \ > .· > ·····
PropkrtyAddr$s~: < •· .. ,. Hi:33ElEIDLERSl"
. P;rc~I kiG~hkr { .. .... ·• \ 14{f6iid5t()()10-:fo .
. AsiJii~b,~ ~rbnta~~D /if···· ·1:=~et,··· ·
Ft8nl Fobtdo;l: ··. · · ii:t3s.1s•.·
•··. ·•. ifti~ated r~rf;~t
... est1MATE[) 'l"bfALtio~t i>.
~r~p~~y b~sdripi'lon·· ...
. . CITY & MUS!<~6q~ / <
HEVISE.DRLATOF 1903 ·. •· · ·.
BLK4.54 ·.. ·...... · .. .
s.41 FT LOTS.10 &T1
. .•·· . ;;};:\' \: ·•
<.•. . . i. /(..·· .
·.·. Your voteCOUi\/TS(
···p1easffvoteeithe(inravorOroppOi,ed to··the Sped~! Asse~~.tnentStreet. Paving .ProjeGf.
. . .·.•. LAM)~ FA00R I l . · . ..· . .. . .. I A~OPPOSEo lxl ·.
<w~:::~r<f
' -, ' '' ., ', '. . - ;·,<,.- __-.:__ - ' '
~~~~; ¢i8,,~~~r,~·.'. 1 ,,.,,,..,,_ ·
. Addre~sff~~;ilii41/✓_Rif·••·r• .f\8tire~s
,>;<'spgc1ttissE·ssrv11=Nr.s•·••·•··•. . . . \
/·.·•·······••FlEARINCrRESPdNSE.GA~tJ.< .·.·.····.·.;.x .••.•. i <'>··.•··•······>•
......·.· > i • · •. .
ggspqNsE CPlJNJS As '.'JN FAYOR?OF PRQ.Jl;QT-1):>h;iye youtyqte.cqutit; pleii~e
·i~ii~~!iil*~t;r!t:c~i~,ili 9t~d61~J!~!1!1ii~:tt~fl~%~R,iii!i~sg~~t~!fI~}.;;··:•·.· ;;.i
.u~~ ? .,. . . .
... ed,a~ov~\irro
!1,i,ity
tf:i[s. r~sppns$i!J..~a~d pleqse faqJcate ~hether:you Oppose or Favqr '., ·
pec1al assessment project, sign tn.eform anq return it fa the
·p~r,c(l?Y iJ;i1;iil,
.tpls t.~e
ro,~.: . :. · . · .
simply}old on tfj~Jlottec:tiioes'so fhe ad~ress ~m
Clerk'fi Office.
reyerse 'side is :, · · .
r.
ing,.~ li!E($,Ure Jo seal Jtie forn:f with a small piece Rf.tape or staple prior to. mailing. 11'1 : ·
.~1!'€1 dN• J. ... . ·. . . . " }~lfi j~;j,;;.;i~i.;~~
.0R''.JDF/
)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
. NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS 0IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
. Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 .
ProjectNumber: ·. H 1577
projec;tJitle: ·. BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
Project Des~ription . RECONSTRUCTION .•.
INSTRUCTIONS .•
you
If wish to have your wriUt;!llVOte .included as partof the tabulation of votes forvvarded to
the. Pity Commission for the scheduledpuhlic h.earing, please return thi~ card. by the date
·. i11di.pated;::1bove. To US(;! this rnsponse card pleasejndic;ate whet~er you Opposeor Favor · .
this special assElsSmentproject, sign the form and retwn itto th(;! City Clerk'sOffice. To ..
returnthi~ carq bymail, shnply fqld on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to.seal the form with a small piece oftape or staple prior to mailing. IF ..
•• YOUDO NOTSEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS"IN FAVOR" .OF ·.
PROJECT.. . . . . . . . .. . . .
. AssessmentlnforhlaUon .
Prnp~rty•Addte;s:. 1724. BEIDLER ST
Parcel. Number 24c;2Q5-453c0015-2Q ·
. AssessJb1e fronla(le: 46 ··• • . Feet
. E~timated FrontFoo!Cost: . $35,15 ••· pefFo()t
ESTl~ATED• forAL·cosr $1,406,0()
·.. f'rbpertvbe~cription .•
CITY OF MUSKEGON .
REVISED PLAT OF.1903
N 40FT OF S 80 FT ·.
LOTS.15,16 8LK453
Your.vote COUNTS!
.'·7;~:::ztfVS'Toppqsed tofue:,,,,,,Mses;:::::::;1r
•. .'.,· ·.P
' .- : . . -
. Owner . . . . . . . ·.. .•• . . . .. . CoOwner/Spouse
SignJtureSJ:f:r-4W1• ik-@.Gl; · Signature·.· . ;..·.--
.. .;......;.....__.;....._____.......;.....____
Address g,A).(IDWQTLI . Addr~ss ·.... ··•.· .....·•. ··. ·.• •.... •·· •....· ... · > .. ·•· · •·
Than·k· youM
.. . . .· ··.. .
..•····.·1.2
.... ·. • ;~tlfJuMl!llo vote onthis
·...
·.. . •.· . ·. ··. . .· .. ·. . ·..
.· 1ffl~
···
. MUSKEG0!'1I; Ml
·
kl .
im.portant issue.. D~.c\/JPY'l.·.£l.
49441
26
' ,- ;·.. . -, - . .
DAVI0WOTLI
1724BEIDLER .
iJii11 IC-llCnt"'\M ft.JU AOAA1
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
ReturnThis Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004.
Project Number: H 1577 ·. . ...
Project TiUe: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
.Project . Description RECONSTRUCTION ·.
· INSTRUCTIONS .
. I.f you wish to have your wriUen vote)ncluded as part of.the tabulation of votes forwarded to· ..
_the City Commission for the scheduled pubii? hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated ab9ye. To use thi,sresponse card ple~seindicc1te w.hetheryou Opposeorfavor
·, this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the CitY Clerk's Office. To ) •·...•
. retumthis. card. by rn1:lil, simply fold on the dotted !lnes so the address on the, reyf;lrse side is
a
showing. Be sure to seal the form with small piece. of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOURVOTE C()UNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
· PROJECT, . ··... ·· ..· -•· . . . . .
••
Assessment Information .
. •• .. ' • •,a : .. - - '
. PropertyAddress; 172OBEIDLER ST .
Parcel Number . 24-205~453-0015-10
Ass1;1ssable Fr611t~ge: .4o · Feet
. ,, ' .
Estimated Fmnt Foot Cost: . ··. .. .$35:15. · per Foot
ESTIMATED fo;AL COST . ·$J,406.00
Property .D~scription
- - ,•
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF.1~03
. BLK 453
N 40 FTOF S 1.20 FT LOTS 15& 16
.Yourvote COUNTS!·.
Please vote eitherjn favor or opp()$~~ to th~ Special Assess~ent Stre~t Paving Pro'ect •
. .. ;AM IN FAV()RJ <I . .· . I AM OPPOSED
. ' . -
Owner
.. · . · ·.•· ..·•
DAVID WOTLI
. . . lill:l!BEIOL!l'I •·. · ·. ·.
Co0wner/Spouse .· •..•·. •·· ·. ·. Q i • .,.· •
.·.·•.··· >l<'ll;>JD. •· ...· ·•· .
. Signature•··· MIJSKEG?~, .• . Signc1ture •· '11U~<'-t~:oz-l.,/
· · ·. .·. · ·~l,,JoAT'l..f2A '· .·
. .· .... ·. ' /1,f/ 4,94 ~ I ..
Atjdr~ .· . . . ·· Address
. Thank you for taking the time to vote on this importantissue., · ·• . .. . .. 27
DAVIDWQTLI
DAVIDWOTLI 1724BEIDLER
1724BEIDLER MUSKEGON, Ml 49441
MUSKEGON, Ml49441
SPECIALASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "I.N FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By . FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project.Number: H1577
Project Title: BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE.TO SOUTHERN AVE.
Project Description·• . RECONSTRUCTION · •..
·. INSTRUCTIONS .
lfyou wish to have yourWritien vote.included aspart ofthe tabulation of votes forwarded to
. the qity Commission forthe scheduled publichearing, please return this cwd by the date
indicated above, Jo use this n:isponsElcard please ir)dicatewhether you Oppose or Favor.
this spetial assessme.nt.pmject,sign the form and retum jt to the City ClerWs Office. To
·. return tt1is card by .mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address pn the reverse side is
showing .. 8El sure to seal the form Witn a small. piece of.tape or staple prior to mailing. IF··
I
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS\\FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF I
PROJECT.
Assessment Information •·•)'.. . ' . '
1
Property Address: •
,-,i
1766 BEIDLER ST .• ·.· .) ' . ' . '
·,· ,' --..:. ----: _. ' -
. Parcel Number .-·-:; · 24-205~456-0001°10 RfCEfveo-i/ .· .
Ass~s~ablEl Frontage: . ·. 65 feet' · ·•.·. F€B OIJ?qn}" j,
• EstirnatedFrontFootCost:. ·. . · $35.15 •· perfoot Cityc/erk.s
,
0'"'1·. .·/• .
,,Jee- _-\
ESilMJ\"TED TOTAL cos+·.. . $2,284.75 ; ,' _, ~~..- :
. i i' Property D~scription •··•.. ,
,, ' - ' . '' ·. ' ..
. ¢IT\' OF MU$KE<,ON
REVISEDPLAT OF 1903.
· S 65 FT LOTS 1-2.
BLK.456
' '
---<-i6ut- vote :couftrs+\.. ·-~ ;
Please.vote
, - -.
eitherinfavuror
-_ - I _.- -
opposedto
. ,. - ·.
the Spedal
. . - .
Assessment
- ·--- - ',
itreet Paving Project.
·-·•·
. JAM INFAVo.RJ 1 •...·. •·· 1.AMOPPOSED ~
Owner :/JQw:dAvJ-0.:JJv CoQwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ . . . - -
'.·. 'Signature . f#tvY (f-6U~o!,> . 7 ignat~reJ¼~t;,t\, G,e)._/4~~/i,0.·.··•· ·
Address · ·• .· / f:J. (., (~,11,oS.~V: <}, Jl.ddress . ' / fJC Dvc½-F:t:~;1}}f:, ·.
' Thank)iQU for taking the time tovote oh this important iss~e, ' 23 ,
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
. Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
ProjectNumber:. · H 1577
Project Title: · BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE. ·
· · Project Description.• RECONSTRUCTION\
·INSTRUCTIONS
. If yqu Wish to have your written vote inducted ~$ p~rt oftheJabulation of votesJorwarded to
the Cjty Commission for the scheduled public hearing, plepse return this card by the di=lte ·-
indicated above. ro
use this respopse card please indicate y.,hether you Opposeor Fpvor.
this special assessment project,sign theform 9r,d return itto tt7e City Clerk's Office. To ..
.. return this Cc)rd by mail, simply foid on the dotted lines sothe address on the reverse side is
show!pg. Be sure to seal the tormwith.a small piece oftape or staple priorto mailing. IF · .
i~g:iiiforsEr~ INTtJIS fORMYQURVOTECOLJNJSAS "IN FAV.OR" PF
Assessment Information .
.· Propertyl\ddr~ss:· .·.1755 BEIDLER ST .
Parcel Number . 24.'.205-455-00()8;00 Ff€CE7VEIY7
.·•Asses;able Frohtage: 41.25 · Feet FEB o1:; 2nrl/, /
E~timatectFrnnt Foot Cost: $35.15 · perFoo( c· ·.•.• ... ·. ··. ,
lty Clerks O.tt:·.,
ice./
I
· ESTIMA+Eo TOTAL cosT ·• $1,449.94
.. Prbp~rt?oescriptioh
~1rv ot MUSKEGON ....
REVISED PLATOF 1903
BLK455 .
N1/2LOJ6
Your Vote COUNTS! ..
lt .... . •· . ·-•
.. . PleaseVoteeitherjn favor~~ opposed to thesieci;,I Assess;ent Street Paving Project. .· .
. ·• ·. I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED . · ~ ·.· . .
.~;:::"ie .• · ~ .G60w;::;::,~z,~~,>
Address ·. )9f cex~'(} Pi:'; > ·, .. · · Address . xi,tk# ¢1-v~ d • ff, .
· Th:rnk you fortaking thetirneto vote on this important issue.· ,,, n '"''"'~> ·. ·. 3
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By . FEBRUARY 10, 2004 ·
Project Nurriber: . H t577 .· ..· ·. . ·.· ·•· .· ·.. · . . · · .... · · . ·.·..
Project Title: . . BEl()LER ST., LAKETON AVE. T0SOUTHE;N AVE. •
. ProjecfQes6ripti9n . REGPNSTRLJCTION ....
. INSTRUCTIONS.
·... If you wish to have your writtenvoteinduoed 9Spartof the tabul.ation of votes fotwarded to
the City Commission for.the scheduled publi? hearing, please return this card by tge date
.indicated above, to.u!:lethis responsecwd pleas~.indici:ltewhetheryou.()ppose or Favor
. this special f;lSSessmentproject,signthe form and return.it to the C::ity Clerk's Office .. ·To
return this card by mail; sin1ply fold on the dottedJines S() the address on the reverse side is
sho\>lljng .. Be sure to seal theJormwith a sma.11 piece of tape orstaple prior.to rnaiiing. lF
YOU DONOTSEND INTHIS FORMYOURVOTE COUNTS AS ''IN FAVOR" OF
~~s~~;~:htlnformatioh .·• > / . ·.•· . •·•. ··..
. PropenyAddreis:' . 176~ E3Elb½E~ ST ....
Parcel Numb~/ · ·•· 24,205-455-0008·1
_,. o
___
- ' ' ',
.· Asses~~ble Front;ge:'. ... 82.5, >Fe~(·. · FEB Oti 2nnf
Esti~ated FrontFoofCC>it: ' •.· ',_ _"; -·,
$35.15
',_._:·.-
. ,peri=oot
' ,·, ',_ 01 Clerks Office
· ·esr1~ATED T()TAtbdsr ·. .· · ·.•·. $;,899'.88 ·••·. . ~~--:.J
.·. Prop~rty De~c~iptiCJrr.
.· CIT\' OF MUSKEGON
. REVISED PLAT OF 1993 .
BLK 455 .
s 1/2 LOT B.
·YoL1rvote60UNisf ·
Please vote either infavoforopposedto the Special Assessment StreetPaving Project.·..
•. · lAMJNF:YoRJ/i1; • . 1AMo~to?tD ~J
O~ner • < ~/Jl!/)4 . ·. • CCJ0wner/$po~se·,..·.;.··r::-~:;,:;;;;:;.~~~~=""':,;-
Sigratur<1 ~7flk¼8~~·.... ·~.igni:l_ture ~ •·.····•.·.v1: .......•..•.·. ,.........·•.•.·
/ 0 ~ .· .. ·· ..
Address /9/)6 ~ y { - .•. .•..· ·. <;d~ress · ,(ffe,?<~1J c:16~
Thank you fortak1ng the time.to vote on this important issue. . ,.,,.• "'' »,c,,,,,·r• · . . 2 ..
·PIJ II :nrr::mewwnouw:'1u;;1-w ,ii'
To: Evelyn/Engineer Department
From: Rick Anderson
I 780 Beidler
Muskegon, Ml 49441
Date: February 6, 2004
Re: Project H 15 77 Beidler@ Laketon Ave to Southern Ave
Reconstruction
We did not receive a "Hearing Response Card". We called the Engineer
Department to request a card but got the answering machine.
Please note that I am OPPOSED to the Special Street Paving Project.
Owner:,_..:-:C=--c...._.,_r--'' --J.A_J__.JCV\.."'1Jlod.:=t.1..~:cw>~c..1£1,:1...>.......-'l~(_ _ _ __
Signature: C . ~ ~ ✓et > bA l(
RECEIVED
CITY OF MUSKEGON
FEB O6 200~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
i
\·
) .
r,.
,.,
Date: February I 0, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Public Hearing
Create Special Assessment District for:
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR ..
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of the McCRACKEN ST.,
SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR., and to create the special assessment district and
appoint two City Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with
the project
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of
Assessors by adopting the attached resolution
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
go---·~
H-1561 MCCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
PROPERTY OWNER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TABULATION
FEET PERCENTAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS - 75
FOR OPPOSE
LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET LETTER#ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET
TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE 4404.890 50 2458 MCCRACKEN 24-210-002-0006-00 60.00 59 2319 GREENWOOD 24-035-400-0001-01 83.63
11 2471 MCCRACKEN 24-205-649-0003-00 89.08 60 2326 GREENWOOD 24-205-620-0001-10 5.30
FRONT FEET OPPOSED 1161.46 26.37% 63 2006 HARDING 24-205-639-0008-10 33.00
75 2085 LAKESHORE 24-205-636-0007-00 61,88
RESPONDING FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 149.080 3.38% 73 2104 MCCRACKEN 24-205-636-0009-00 66.00
32 2169 MCCRACKEN 24-205-642-0001-00 45.00
NOT RESPONDING - FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 3094.350 70.25% 70 2204 MCCRACKEN 24-205-638-0007-00 41.00
69 2218 MCCRACKEN 24-205-638-0006-00 35.15
TOTAL FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 3243.430 73.63% 64 2272 MCCRACKEN 24-205-639-0008-00 / 66.00
20 2355 MCCRACKEN 24-205-647-0001-00 71,70
56 2382 MCCRACKEN 24-395-002-0002-00 50.00
17 2409 MCCRACKEN 24-205-648-0001-00 58.50
12 2465 MCCRACKEN 24-205-649-0002-00 44.54
49 2472 MCCRACKEN 24-210-002-0004-00 70.60
48 2480 MCCRACKEN 24-210-002-0003-00 45.00
47 2488 MCCRACKEN 24-210-002-0002-00 50.00
10 2493 MCCRACKEN 24-205-649-0005-00 89,08
8 2521 MCCRACKEN 24-205-650-0002-00 81.54
40 2538 MCCRACKEN 24-210-001-0001-00 41.00
3 2563 MCCRACKEN 24-779-001-0002-00 44.54
29 2075 MINER 24-205-643-0001-00 45.00
67 2026 MORTON 24-205-638-0009-00 33.00
Z} "'
""'"'
. t.,,
~
-k
d ,j "2 D ~ 0 ---.;:::, "
~I
~
·c Q..,.
~
CL
~
~
~
"'..',.::;·
Q_
"- "'d
-a ""- 0 0
Z2-=
cc._.
-£;,
e r ~,!_
'"-
C
·~
~
1
:J --~'
~
' ¥
.s
~ 7
< co
di'
C!}
i -e
°) 1 149.08
<::j,
116j.46
1TALS
ti "'i
~
~
-,J -,
·2
C ~
' ;J" " ' ""~ ) -~·'
~
-'
~
<
j '
' =
a
~ ..,s •_y_'1 /'G ,>__,.
~
~
<: C
~) , . V
$
< '"'
"<.
"-·
'! )
A 0
>-- -cJ
s ; j ~
-1" ? J c· 0
/
j
.- ci
,J (j
c, ~ \.., • C. cQ <L
-;)._j c:d '7 :;;:
0
/r-:::
9
<:..
S
c:..,._ \l ~-") --:1 i :;:., h
·"'i
,,"'
C ~'!
,,,, '"'
(">
;:
~
__.;.
~
' 5
-.',
J -"t, V,
- :'1 ,..:;<
i C
3
rz;
cl
l<J ~
'-.)-
..., 0 :6 '}
lD
r,
c;.- 2 -C-3
2 7
iA
" C _,y"SQ, ("b (">
c::!.. r{
tle
',~
L C:, ~ ~ ~~
TABULATED AS OF: 04:30 PM ,:"' p "'
_;} \0
® ~.
~~/
:--{,~
,:i (D' ~: t. I~ 0,
~ 1._, c:'..J
2/10/20044:30 PMTABULATION OF THE RESPONSES TO THE SP.
' ASS. HEARING ON MCCRACKEN
.~ (.:;:;:.,
:::) ,_;
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Resolution No. 2004-lB(d)
Resolution At First Hearing Creating Special Assessment District
For McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Location and Description of Properties to be Assessed:
See Exhibit A attached to this resolution
RECITALS:
I. A hearing has been held on February 10, 2004 at 5:30 o'clock p.m. at the City
Commission Chambers. Notice was given by mail and publication as required by
law.
2. That estimates of costs of the project, a feasibility report and valuation and benefit
information are on file with the City and have been reviewed for this hearing.
3. At the hearing held February 10, 2004, there were 26. 37 % objections by the owners of
the property in the district registered at the hearing either in writing received before or at
the hearing or by owners or agents present at the hearing, and the Commission has
considered the advisability of proceeding with the project.
FINDINGS:
1. The City Commission has examined the estimates of cost to construct the project
including all assessable expenses and determines them to be reasonable.
2. The City Commission has considered the value of the property to be assessed and the
value of the benefit to be received by each property proposed to be assessed in the district
after the improvements have been made. The City Commission determines that the
assessments of costs of the City project will enhance the value of the properties to be
assessed in an amount at least equivalent to the assessment and that the improvement
thereby constitutes a benefit to the property.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The City Commission hereby declares a special assessment district to include the
property set forth in Exhibit A attached to this resolution.
2. The City Commission determines to proceed with the improvements as set forth in the
feasibility study and estimates of costs, and directs the City Engineer to proceed with
project design, preparation of specifications and the bidding process. If appropriate and
if bonds are to be sold for the purposes of financing the improvements, the Finance
Department shall prepare plans for financing including submission of application to the
Michigan Department of Treasury and the beginning of bond proceedings.
3. The City Commission hereby appoints a Board of Assessors consisting of City
Commissioners Davis and - - Larson
---------
and the City Assessor who are hereby directed to prepare an assessment roll.
Assessments shall be made upon front foot basis.
4. Based on the City's Special Assessment policy and preliminary estimates it is expected
that approximately 25.81 °/4, of the cost of the street improvement will be paid by special
assessments.
5. Upon submission of the special assessment roll, the City staff is hereby directed to notify
all owners and persons interested in properties to be assessed of the hearing at which the
City Commission will consider confirmation of the special assessment roll.
This resolution adopted.
Ayes Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson
Nays None
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10, 2004.
The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of
Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts-of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By ~Q L
Gail A. Kundinger, ClerM
~
EXHIBIT A
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
All properties abutting that section of McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE
DR.
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
) ss
COUNTY OF MUSKEGON )
TO CREATE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FOLLOWING:
McCracken St. Sherman Blvd to Lakeshore Dr.
THE DEPONENT SAYS THAT THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED UPON
EACH OWNER OF OR PARTY IN INTEREST IN PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED IN
THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHOSE NAME APPEARS UPON THE
LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON BY
MAILING SUCH NOTICE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE BY FIRST CLASS UNITED
STATES MAIL, WITH POSTAGE PREPAID, ADDRESSED TO EACH SUCH
OWNER OR PARTY IN INTEREST AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON SAID LAST
TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS BY DEPOSITING THEM IN AN OFFICIAL
UNITED STATES MAIL RECEPTACLE ON THE 30T~ DA Y-0 ~ 2004.
GAIL A. KUNDINGER, CITY C RK
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
/It-A DAY OF & d ctt a /'L , 2004.
?!'
NOTARY P BLIC, MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 2 -r:2S--tl C;
LOCATION MAP
j
ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY
For
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
The reconstruction of McCracken street between Sherman & Lakeshore Dr., see attached exhibit,
was initiated by the City due to the conditions of the pavement and drainage facilities as well as
the need to install a 12" watermain loop between two transmission mains to improve reliability
of the water distribution system in that area. The existing pavement has deteriorated to a level
where, we believe, a total reconstruction is necessary. This section of road has not had, to the
best of our records, any major work since the 1930 and has an average Pavement Condition
Index of around 30. The proposed improvements (reconstruction) consist of following;
1. Complete removal of existing pavement and replace with a new asphalt street section that
would include curb & gutter and a proposed width of37' back to back. The additional width
of one foot might be utilized in the future for a turn lane if the need arises. However, for the
time being it would be used for an on street parking where permissible.
2. spot repairs on the existing sanitary sewer main
3. Replace existing watermain along with water services the cost of which is estimated at
$300,000 that is not assessable.
A memo from the Assessor's office, which addresses the appraisal and benefit information, is
attached.
The preliminary cost estimate for the work associated with paving is approximately $600,000
with the length of the project being approximately 5227 lineal feet (project length) or 4404 of
assessable footage. This translates into an estimated improvement cost of $136 per assessable
foot. The assessment figure will be at a cost not to exceed $35.15 per assessable foot as
established in the 2004 Special Assessment for this type of improvement
MUSKEGON COUNTY
wm
M C H G A N
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
Paul T. Baade, Chair
District 10
Bill Gill, Vice-Chair
District 8 January 14, 2004
Douglas A. Bennett Mohammed Al-Shatel, City Engineer
District 7 City of Muskegon
933 Terrace Street
Charles L. Buzzell
District 2 Muskegon, MI 49443
James J. Derezinski
Mr. Al-Shatel:
District 4 In accordance with your request, I have examined the proposed special assessment
Marvin R. Engle district entailing the reconstruction of McCracken Street between Sherman
District 5 Boulevard and Lakeshore Drive. The purpose of this analysis is to document the
reasonableness of this special assessment district by identifying and quantifying any
Louis A. McMurray
District 9 accrued benefits. It is subject to the normal governmental restrictions of escheat,
taxation, police power and eminent domain. The effective date is January 14,
Robert Scolnik 2004.
District 11
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the special assessment amounts justly and
I. John Snider II
District 3
reasonably represents the accrued benefits to the properties encompassed by this
project. The amounts reflect the sum of the inunediate estimated value
Nancy A. Waters enhancement and the intrinsic value that will accrue from an overall increase in
District 6
property values due to an improved quality of life created by the proposed project.
Stephen R. Wisniewski As previously presented, the proposed special assessment district encompasses
District 1 primarily residential properties. The front foot rate of$35. 15 for the
reconstruction of the above mentioned project area appears reasonable in light of
an analysis that indicates a possible enhancement of$35.76. The conclusions are
based upon the data presented within this limited analysis in restricted format, and
on supporting information in my files.
Sincerely,
J~G-½
Vicki A Emery, CMAE 3
Senior Appraiser
EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT • 17:J E. M"PLE AVE., BUILDING C • MUSKEGON, Ml 49442
(231) 7:o4-63B6 • FAX (231) 724-1129
TTY /231) 722-4103 • An EEO I ADA I AA Employer
recycled paper
January 30, 2004
Dear :OWNERS NAME
OWNERS ADDRESS & STREET
OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE, OWNERS ZIPCODE 1
The City of Muskegon is asking for your support for improvement of the street adjoining your
property located at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET.
The City of Muskegon believes that by making the proposed street improvements you will
have less road noise, dust, and wear and tear on your vehicle. In addition, street
improvements provide easier access for delivery of services such as snow plowing, mail
delivery, and bus service.
Called a special assessment district, the largest percentage of the proposed street
improvement will be paid for by the City of Muskegon (via local funds and or grants); however,
it will be necessary for you to cover a share of the cost (which you can spread over a period of
ten years) based on the amount of property you own bordering the street. A description of the
project, including the associated cost to you and the City, is located in the documents
attached to this letter.
While the City of Muskegon believes that the proposed improvements will result in a safer and
cleaner street while adding curb appeal to your property, you do have the right to ask further
questions, decline, or protest participation in this particular project. Please carefully review the
enclosed materials and call the City's Engineering Department at 724-6707 or your ward
commissioner if you require more information.
A public hearing is also scheduled for this project on FEBRUARY 10, 2004. If you attend this
public hearing you will be given an opportunity to present your questions and potential
concerns on the proposed special assessment district to the commission.
Also located in this packet of materials is a Special Assessment Hearing Response Card. If
mailed back to the City of Muskegon City Clerk's Office before the scheduled public hearing
your vote will be added to the tabulation of votes during the public hearing. If you do not send
in this form your vote counts as "in favor" of the project.
Thank you for your participation in improving the quality of life in the Muskegon community.
January 30, 2004
OWNERS NAME
OWNERS ADDRESS & STREET
OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE OWNERS ZIPCODE 1
Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX: at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET
NOTICE OF HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Dear Property Owner:
The Muskegon City Commission is considering whether or not to create a special
assessment district which would assess your property for the following paving project:
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
The proposed special assessment district will be located as follows:
All parcels abutting McCracken St.. from Sherman Blvd. to Lakeshore Dr.
It is proposed that a portion of the above improvement will be paid by special
assessment against properties in the aforementioned district. Following are conditions
of the proposed special assessment which are important to you.
Public Hearings
An initial public hearing to consider the creation of a special assessment district will be
held at the City of Muskegon City Commission Chambers on FEBRUARY 10, 2004 at
5:30 P.M. You are encouraged to appear at this hearing, either in person, by agent or
in writing to express your opinion, approval, or objection concerning the proposed
special assessment. We are enclosing a Hearing Response Card for you to indicate
your agreement or opposition to the special assessment. This card includes the
property identification and description, assessable footage per City policy, and the
estimated cost of the assessment. You may also appear, as above, in lieu of, or in
addition to mailing your response card to the City Clerk. Written objections or
appearances must be made at or prior to the hearing. NOTE: THE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT WILL BE CREATED OR NULLIFIED AT THIS HEARING. IT IS
IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO COMMENT AT THIS HEARING IF YOU WANT YOUR
OPINION COUNTED FOR THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.
A second public hearing will be held, if the district is created, to confirm the special
assessment roll after the project is completed. You will be mailed a separate notice for
the second hearing. At this second hearing the special assessment costs will be spread
on the affected properties accordingly. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU
HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT AGAINST YOUR
PARCEL EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THIS HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED AT THE SECOND HEARING, YOU WILL HAVE
THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE ROLL TO FILE A
WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER,
UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THE INITIAL HEARING OR AT THE SECOND HEARING
CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY AGENT, OR IN WRITING
BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX
TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST.
By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the properties to be assessed
shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall
not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its
members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement.
Estimated Costs
The total estimated cost of the street portion of the project is $600,000.00 of which
approximately 25.81 % ($154,831.88) will be paid by special assessment to property
owners. Your property's estimated share of the special assessment is shown on the
attached hearing response card. The remaining costs will be paid by the City.
The street assessment, which covers improvements to the roadway, may be paid in
installments over a period of up to ten (10) years. Any work on drive approaches or
sidewalks will be assessed to the property at actual contract prices and these costs may
also be paid in installments over ten (10) years. Please note this work is in addition to
the street special assessment.
Please refer to the enclosed sheet entitled Special Assessment Payment Options for
more information on the payment options and financial assistance programs available.
I urge you to return the enclosed hearing response card indicating your preference and
to attend the scheduled public hearing. Your views are important to the City and to your
neighbors. Additional information, including preliminary project plans and cost
estimates is available in the Engineering Department located on the second floor of City
Hall. Regular business hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday
except holidays.
Sincerely,
,,I//'
.. / / /·1/-1/; ./ I
t/"//411 ~/j/,~ ,Z;,:5 L- (?,
Mohammed AI-Shatel, P.E.
City Engineer
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET
Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX
Assessable Frontage: $133.62 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $4,696.74
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
SUB-DIV OF BLK 651
LOTS 4, 5, 6, 26 THROUGH 28, BLK 1
ALSO S 125 FT OF VAC N/S ALLEY ABUTTING LOTS 4, 5,
6AND 28
Your vote COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR • CoOwner/Spouse
I AM OPPOSED •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
Signature
----------- Signature
-------------
Address Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
STREET H-1561
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
CDBG APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION .
Name: Birthdate: Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _
Spouse: Birthdate: Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Address: Phone: Race:
Parcel# Owner/Spouse Legally Handicapped Or Disabled? ( )Yes ( ) No
(Please refer to your assessment letter for this information)
Number Living in Household: List information for household members besides owner/spouse here.
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdate Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _ -_ _-_ _
· ..
. INCOME INFORMATION . .
ANNUAL Household Income: $ Wage earner:
(Must include all household income)
Wage earner:
Wage earner:
Wage earner:
Total: $
'
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Proof Of Ownership: ( ) Deed ( ) Mortgage ( ) Land Contract
Homeowner's Insurance Co: Expiration Date:
Property Taxes: ( ) Current ( ) Delinquent Year(s) Due
(Property taxes must be current to qualify and will be verified by CDBG staff)
.
. OWNER'S SIGNATURE
Owner's Signature: Date:
By signing this application, the applicant verifies he/she owns and occupies the dwelling. The Applicant/Owner certifies
that all infonnation in this application, and all information furnished in support of this application, is true and complete to the
best of the Applicant/Owner's knowledge and belief. The property owner's signature will be required prior to the application
being processed. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER APRIL 15, 2004
. .·
. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) DATE CENSUS TRACT NO.
SIGNATURE TITLE
COMMENTS/REMARKS
**ATTENTION APPLICANT**
Please see reverse side for instructions on providing proof of income, ownership, and property insurance.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
STREET- H-1561
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Note: You may receive this application several times - If you have already applied, please discard.
Dear Resident:
The City of Muskegon has selected the street abutting your property for repairs. To assist homeowners, who
may have difficulty paying the cost of street repairs, the City offers assessment waivers through the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for eligible households and families. If you meet the CDBG
program qualifications, the City may pay the street assessment for you to the extent that funds are available.
Application Requirements:
✓ Applicants must submit proof that their total household income does not exceed 65% of Area Median
Income (see chart below); Proof of income may include copies of Wage & Tax Statement (W-2's) from the year
2003, pension or other benefit checks, bank statements for direct deposits or agency statements for all household
mcome.
2002
65% MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME CHART
FAMILY SIZE INCOME LIMIT
I $27,885
2 31,850
3 35,880
4 39,845
5 43,030
6 46,326
7 49,400
8 52,585
For each extra, add 3,185
✓ Applicants must submit proof that they both own and occupy property at the time of application; Land
Contract purchasers must obtain approval of titleholder prior to receiving assistance. Proof of ownership should be
a deed, m011gage, or land contract; proof of occupancy can be a copy of a d1iver's license or other official
document showing both your name and address.
✓ Applicants must submit proof of current property insurance.
Please complete the first four (4) sections of the application on the reverse side of this notice, and return it, along with
supporting documentation, to: City of Muskegon
Community & Neighborhood Services
933 Terrace Street, 2nd Floor
Muskegon,MI49440
For further information, please contact this office by calling 724-6717, weekdays from 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
The City rese11 1es the right to verify all application i1?/(Jrmation, and to reject any applications that containfals(fied information or insufficient
documentation.
Special Assessment Payment Options
Property owners in the City of Muskegon who are being specially assessed for street, sidewalk or other public
improvements may pay their assessment in the following ways:
I. Lump Sum Payment in Full
Assessments may be paid in full within sixty (60) days of the confirmation of the special assessment roll
without interest.
II. Installment Payments
Assessments not paid within the first sixty (60) days may be paid in installments over several years as follows:
Street and Alley Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments. For example, if the
amount of your assessment is $850.00, you will be billed $85.00 per year plus applicable interest as
described below.
Driveway, Sidewalk, and Approach Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments
plus applicable interest as described below.
Interest- Simple interest is charged at the rate of 5.00% per year unless the City has borrowed money
to complete the project for which you are assessed and has pledged you assessments for repayment of
the borrowed money. In such cases, the interest you are charged is equal to the interest rate the City
must pay on the borrowed money plus 1.00%.
Ill. Special Assessment Deferral (Low Income Seniors and Disabled Persons)
To qualify for a special assessment deferral you or your spouse (if jointly owned) must:
• Be 65 years or older or be totally or permanently disabled.
• Have been a Michigan resident for five (5) years or more and have owned and occupied the homestead
being assessed for five (5) years or more.
• Be a citizen of the U.S.
• Have a total household income not in excess of $16,823.00
• Have a special assessment of $300.00 or more.
Under this program the State of Michigan will pay the entire balance owing of the special assessment,
including delinquent, current, and further installments. At the time of payment a lien will be recorded on your
property in favor of the State of Michigan. Repayment to the State must be made at the time the property is
sold or transferred or after the death of the owner(s). During the time the special assessment is deferred
interest is accrued at the rate of 6.00% per year.
IV. Further Information About the Above Programs
Further information about any of the above payment options may be obtained by calling either the City
Assessor's Office at 724-6708 or the City Treasurer's Office at 724-6720. Applications may be obtained at
the Muskegon County Equalization Office in the Muskegon County building or City of Muskegon Assessor's
Office in City Hall.
V. Additional Special Assessment Payment Assistance
Qualified low and moderate income homeowners who are being assessed may be eligible for payment
assistance through the City of Muskegon Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Assistance
from this program will be available to the extent that funds are available. To obtain further information and
determine whether you are eligible, contact the Community and Neighborhood Services Department at
724-6717.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
IN AN EFFORT TOWARDS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT, the Muskegon City Commission is
proposing that special assessment districts be created for the following projects:
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON A VE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
AND
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
The specific locations of the special assessment districts and the properties proposed to be assessed are:
All parcels abutting Beidler St. from Laketon Ave. to Southern Ave.
All parcels abutting McCracken St. from Sherman Blvd. to Lakeshore Dr.
And
All parcels abutting Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln St. to Beach St.
The City Commission proposes that the City and property owners by means of special assessments will
share the cost of improvement. You may examine preliminary plans and cost estimates in the City Hall's
Engineering Department during regular business hours - between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on weekdays,
except holidays.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE MUSKEGON CITY
COMMISSION CHAMBERS ON FEBRUARY JO, 2004 AT 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M
PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT
EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THE HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
ROLL IS CONFIRMED (AT A LATER HEARING) YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF THE ROLL'S CONFIRMATION TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE
MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THIS HEARING
OR AT THE HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY YOUR AGENT OR
REPRESENTATIVE, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO
APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST.
By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the property to be assessed shall object to the
assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission
determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the
improvement.
PUBLISH: January 31 1 2004 Gail Kundinger, City Clerk
ADA POLICY
The City will provide necessary appropriate auxiliary aids and services, for example, signers for the hearing
impaired, audiotapes for the visually impaired, etc., for disabled persons who want to attend the meeting, upon
twenty-four hours notice to the City. Contact:
Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Ml 49440
(231) 724-6705 or TDD (231) 724-6773
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT H 1561
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
1 THORSEN PAUL D/SHEILA P ASSESSABLE FEET: 133.62
24-779-001-0004-00 3377 WINNETASKA COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2591. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $4,696.74 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 3.0334
2 ZIMMERMAN RENEE MARIE ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54
24-779-001-0003-00 2571 MCCRACKEN COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2571. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111
3 NELSON EVELYN ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54
24-779-001-0002-00 2563 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2563. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111
4 HOLDEMAN STEPHEN E ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54
24-779-001-0001-00 2011 LETART AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2011. LETART AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441-145 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111
5 HOPKINS JEFFERY L ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54
24-205-650-0006-00 2012 LETART AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2012. LETART AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111
6 FERRIS ROGER L ASSESSABLE FEET: 60.04
24-205-650-0005-00 2533 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2533. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ~'_$_2_,1_10_.4_1~
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3630
7 FISHER STEPHEN D ASSESSABLE FEET: 36.5
24-205-650-0004-00 2525 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2525. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,282.98 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.8286
1/30/2004 Page 1 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
8 SANFORD IVAN ASSESSABLE FEET: 81.54
24-205-650-0002-00 2521 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2521. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,866.13 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8511
9 LACH CORNELIUS JR ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54
24-205-650-0001-00 2509 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2509. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111
10 FLICKEMA DAVID A ASSESSABLE FEET: 89.08
24-205-649-0005-00 2493 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2493. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,131.16 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.0223
11 BACHELLER GORDON L/JUDY D ASSESSABLE FEET: 89.08
24-205-649-0003-00 2471 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2471. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,131.16 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.0223
12 THEILE RAY ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54
24-205-649-0002-00 2465 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2465. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111
13 MONROE SHARON F ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.54
24-205-649-0001-00 2457 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2457. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,565.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0111
14 NEMETH STACEY ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-205-648-0001-30 2008 CUTLER AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2008. CUTLER AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
1/30/2004 Page 2 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
15 MOBLO SIMON/TIERZA ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-205-648-0001-20 2429 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2429. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
ANDERSON JON D ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
16
24-205-648-0001-10 2427 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2427. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
17 RIPKA VINCENT A ASSESSABLE FEET: 58.5
24-205-648-0001-00 2409 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2409. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,056.28 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3281
18 BUSCH GREGORY S/CHANDRA ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-205-647-0012-00 2389 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@2389. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
19 ROBERTSON KURT A ASSESSABLE FEET: 121.4
24-205-647-0001-10 2365 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2365. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $4,267.21
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.7560
20 COMEAU FRANCIS A ASSESSABLE FEET: 71.7
24-205-647-0001-00 2355 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2355. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,520.26 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.6277
21 VANDENBOSCH DAVID H/ANNE ASSESSABLE FEET: 50.54
24-205-646-0019-00 2331 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2331. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,776.48 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1474
1/30/2004 Page 3 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
NEWMYER EDWARD A ASSESSABLE FEET: 100.5
22
24-205-646-0001-20 880 1ST ST STE 507 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2321. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49440 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,532.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2816
GROOMS REMONE T/TESFAY LI ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
23
24-205-646-0001-10 2311 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2311. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
BURLINGAME DAVID C/KATHY A ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24
24-205-644-0010-00 2287 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2287. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
WAKEFIELD SAMUEL T ASSESSABLE FEET: 100.5
25
24-205-644-0001-10 50 LAKESHORE BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2271. MCCRACKE NORTON SHOR Ml 49444 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,532.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2816
VANDENBERG TRAVIS/STACI ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
26
24-205-644-0001-00 2265 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2265. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
CURCIO PAMELA ANNE ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
27
24-205-643-0023-10 PO BOX 222 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2239. MCCRACKE NUNICA Ml 49448 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
MEDENDORP DAVID ASSESSABLE FEET: 100.5
28
24-205-643-0001-10 PO BOX 298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2223. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST $3,532.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2816
1/30/2004 Page 4 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
29 JOLMAN DANIEL J/JULIE SIUDA ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24-205-643-0001-00 2075 MINER AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2075. MINER AVE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
30 MEDENDORP ERIN ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24-205-642-0019-10 PO BOX 0298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2191. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
31 WAKEFIELD SAMUEL T ASSESSABLE FEET: 100.5
24-205-642-0001-10 50 LAKES HORE BL VD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2175. MCCRACKE NORTON SHOR Ml 49444 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,532.58 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.2816
32 KRUZEL ALLISON J ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24-205-642-0001-00 2169 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2169. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
33 LAKESIDE M & G DEVELOPMEN ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24-205-641-0001-40 PO BOX 298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2137. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
34 LAKESIDE M & G DEVELOPMEN ASSESSABLE FEET: 84
24-205-641-0001-30 PO BOX 298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2123. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,952.60 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9070
35 LAKESIDE M & G DEVELOPMEN ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24-205-641-0001-00 PO BOX 298 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2111. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-029 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
1/30/2004 Page 5 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
36 HOLDEMAN STEPHEN E ASSESSABLE FEET: 85
24-645-000-0005-00 2011 LETART AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1996. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441-145 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,987.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9297
37 2572 MCCRACKEN LLC ASSESSABLE FEET: 102.6
24-645-000-0003-00 6151 RIDGEVIEW DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2572. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,606.39 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.3292
38 HARRIS MARGARET M ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-645-000-0002-00 2564 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2564. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9081
39 VANDENBERG TROY/JACKIE ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-645-000-0001-00 2556 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2556. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9081
40 HEGBLOOM ROBERT G REVOC ASSESSABLE FEET: 41
24-210-001-0001-00 2092 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2538. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,441.15 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9308
41 ADAMS MARTHA J ASSESSABLE FEET: 42
24-210-001-0002-00 2534 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2534. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,476.30 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9535
42 MURPHY JOHN Ill/SUSAN ASSESSABLE FEET: 36
24-210-001-0003-00 2530 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2530. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,265.40 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.8173
1/30/2004 Page 6 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
43 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGI ASSESSABLE FEET: 40
24-210-001-0004-00 7575 HUNTINGTON PARK DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2524. MCCRACKE COLUMBUS OH 43235 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,406.00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9081
44 PLEIMLING ORPHA/HOFFMAN D ASSESSABLE FEET: 72.4
24-210-001-0005-00 2518 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2518. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,544.86 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.6436
45 0 BRIEN AMANDA ASSESSABLE FEET: 36.2
24-210-001-0007-00 1989 PHILO AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1989. PHILO AVE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,212.43 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.8218
46 ALLEN ROBERT B ASSESSABLE FEET: 42
24-210-002-0001-00 1988 PHILO AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 1988. PHILO AVE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,476.30 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9535
47 CHARLES JASON G ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-210-002-0002-00 2488 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2488. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
48 WILLIAMSON DORIS A ET AL ASSESSABLE FEET: 45
24-210-002-0003-00 2480 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2480. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,581.75 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0216
49 ARMSTRONG TODD M ASSESSABLE FEET: 70.6
24-210-002-0004-00 2472 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2472. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,481.59 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.6028
1/30/2004 Page 7 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
50 MOLER SAM ASSESSABLE FEET: 60
24-210-002-0006-00 2458 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2458. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2, 109_00 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3621
51 EISTEDT KENT S ASSESSABLE FEET: 53.6
24-210-003-0001-00 2442 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2442. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,884.04 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.2168
52 CROUCH SCOTT ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-210-003-0002-00 2434 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2434. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
53 SMITH ERIC M/JULIA I ASSESSABLE FEET: 75
24-210-003-0003-00 2428 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2428. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,636.25 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.7027
54 FRONCEK TIMOTHY A ASSESSABLE FEET: 44.5
24-210-003-0005-00 2412 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2412. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,564.18 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.0102
55 SMITH ALLENS ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-395-002-0001-00 2392 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2392. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
56 BARNES JUSTIN CNISSER MAR ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-395-002-0002-00 2382 MCCRACKEN COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2382. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
1/30/2004 Page 8 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
57 VARGAS LONNIE L/STACY R ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-395-002-0003-00 2374 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2374. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
58 FLICKEMA DONNA H ASSESSABLE FEET: 85
24-395-002-0004-00 2360 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2360. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,987.75 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.9297
59 KURDZIEL PAUL A/RENEE J ASSESSABLE FEET: 83.63
24-035-400-0001-01 2319 GREENWOOD ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2319. GREENWOO MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,939.59 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.8986
60 WHITE WALTER ASSESSABLE FEET: 5.3
24-205-620-0001-10 2326 GREENWOOD ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2326. GREENWOO MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $186.30 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.1203
61 DYKSTRA RITA J/ROWE A J ASSESSABLE FEET: 106.15
24-205-620-0001-00 2320 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2320. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,731.11 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 2.4098
62 CROSS LON L/ET AL ASSESSABLE FEET: 48.5
24-205-640-0007-00 2003 HARDING AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2003. HARDING A MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,104.78 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1010
63 MOORE LORI L/ARTHUR L ASSESSABLE FEET: 33
24-205-639-0008-10 2006 HARDING AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2006. HARDING A MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,159.95 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.7492
1/30/2004 Page 9 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
64 KOWALSKI ROSEMARY ASSESSABLE FEET: 66
24-205-639-0008-00 2101 MOON ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2272. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319.90 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983
65 VINTON DENNISE ASSESSABLE FEET: 66
24-205-639-0007-10 PO BOX 303 COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2264. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49443-030 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319.90 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983
66 SHERWOOD JAMES R ASSESSABLE FEET: 33
24-205-639-0007-00 2025 MORTON AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2025. MORTON AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,159.95 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.7492
67 JOHNSON JOHN O/CONNIE A LI ASSESSABLE FEET: 33
24-205-638-0009-00 2026 MORTON AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2026. MORTON AV MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,159.95 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.7492
68 DEERY RICHARD J ASSESSABLE FEET: 66
24-205-638-0008-00 3925 HARBOR POINT DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2226. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P 0. COST: I $2,319.90 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983
69 IBERSHOFF KARL G/JANIS K ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-205-638-0006-00 3000 COUNTRY CLUB DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2218. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,151.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.1351
70 DUDGEON LEE J/JANET TRUST ASSESSABLE FEET: 41
24-205-638-0007-00 1498 HIGH ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2204. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,441.1s 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.9308
1/30/2004 Page 10 of 11
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
71 RICHARDS GEORGE C ASSESSABLE FEET: 66
24-205-637-0008-00 2200 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2200. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319.90 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983
72 FGA LLC ASSESSABLE FEET: 66
24-205-637-0007-00 3404 FULTON AVE COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2164. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319.90 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983
73 ANDERSON MARK D/KIM ASSESSABLE FEET: 66
24-205-636-0009-00 2140 MCCRACKEN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2140. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,319_90 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4983
74 LEITGEB ANTHONY J ASSESSABLE FEET: 57.75
24-205-636-0008-00 1015 CAMELOT DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2100. MCCRACKE MUSKEGON Ml 49445 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: lc___$:_2.:.._,0_29_.9_1_,
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.3110
75 VANFOSSEN BARB/JAMES ASSESSABLE FEET: 61.88
24-205-636-0007-00 3276 SOL TWOOD DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2085. LAKESHOR MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,115.08 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 1.4048
SUM OF ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE: 4404.89 SUM OF ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ! $154,831.88 I
TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE PARCELS 75.00
1/30/2004 Page 11 of 11
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2075 MINER AVE
Parcel Number 24-205-643-0001-00
Assessable Frontage: $45.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foo•t--=-RE.:=-:C;::.;E\VEO
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,581.75
FEB 0 ?. ?llO½
Property Description
City Clerks Ottlce
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT 1903
BLK 643
THE NL Y 90 FT OF THE FOLLOWING DEC PARCEL
LOT 1 & EASTERLY 64 FT OF LOT 2
ALSO
Youf vote COUi~TS!
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
_[81
~=-T~ )"",'\-'\
I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED
Owoec CoOwoec/Spo,se -::::.~~.i.i...i;;_.....1...r..JJ..J..l.i....;:a..i:...1...1o.i:..:.
Signature ( ~~~ SignatLtt~~=,..&.~~......;~~~~=~-.J
Address :J, c, :i5:-S(Oi'JI\('. .1- Addre§S..> _--------'"~.L....L...LJ..J..Ji.l..l....L-~
29
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return thls card by mail, simp!y fold on the dotted lines so the ~drlress on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2471 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-649-0003-00 RECEIVED
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Assessable Frontage: $89.08 Feet
$35.15 per Foot
FEB O2 2004
Estimated Front Foot Cost:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,131.16
Property Description
CITY O F MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
FE§ nt>. ?OOt
BLK 649
LOTS 3 & 4 ~ · 1 Glerks Gfftoe
Your voi.e COUi~TS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR
1 I AM OPPOSED •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
✓r
Signature
Address
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
. NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mai!, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse side !s
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2204 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-638-0007-00
Assessable Frontage: $41.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,441.15
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
r~IU!!Jj=;O;-;S~>f~Je:-::,o::--,."+-!0--
BLK 638
NWLY82 FTLOT7
& NWLY 82 FT OF SWLY 10 FT LOT6 f u Hi:J
Your vote COUi-JTS!
U:i;Ll}J aC) =1 /:J
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
STREET H-1561
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
CDBG APPLICATION FOR W AIYER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION
z·
-
Name: ~ c._ ,-.; ~r J?'-'- cP) -~ ., tJ B'.rthdate: ~ 5,~-:' :"- Soci~l Securi'.y # -~&,.~ . t!!-~?
Spouse: I '<::.. c: . ?5 '" p <:; ,._,. - B1rthdate: ·//2 0/.--:. V Socrnl Security IBh. -_,_··•_._- 731,1,.
Address: / '£, ':Z f' ,~-c1f ;(, S:/ Phor( 2 -~ / ) 2 '>7' -D 1/{l ,YRace:
Parcel#~ '/-.::,U-~- {, 3·>s" - I'.: J - b cc Owner/Spouse Legally Handicapped Or Disabled? kJYcs (
l' '" ) No
(Please refer to your assessment letter for this information)
Number Living in Household: _::;,_, List infonnation for household members besides owner/spouse here.
Name {J~~-- Birthdate _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _
Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Birthdate Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _
Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Birthdate Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdatc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Social Security#
. . ... . . .
. . . INCOME INFORMATION ·.
ANNUAL Household Income: Wage earner:
(Must include all household income)
Wage earner:
Wage earner:
Wage earner:
Total:
.·.
PROPERTY INFORMATION ·.
Proof Of Ownership: <)() Deed ( ) Mortgage ( ) Land Contract
Homcowner's Insurance Co: ~ &::7=Ji?7..,...:-G~)<:xpiration Date: ; - -.:;i b ..Cy
Property Taxes: <)<( Cunent ( ) Delinquent Year(s) Due
(Prope11y taxes must be cuJTcnt to qualify and will be verified by CDBG staft)
. .
'
. . . ·. ...--, _ OWNER'S SIGNATURE . .
Owner's Signature/ / ~ ~ ~ )
1
,,_ · · · Date: ;2.. - .2 -G,Y
By signing this applkation, the applicant veri!'iis he/she owns and occupies the dwelling. The Applicant/Owner ce11ifies
that all information in this application, and all information furnished in support of this application, is trne and complete to the
best of the Applicant/Owner's knowledge and belief. The property owner's signature will be required prior to the application
being processed. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER APRIL 15, 2004
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) DATE _ _ _ _ CENSUS TRACT NO.
SIGNATURE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ TITLE
COMMENTS/REMARKS
**ATTENTION APPLICANT**
Please see reverse side for instructions on providing proof of income, ownership, and property insurance.
r our vute l.-VUI~, 0:
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR • )h
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
( J 'l 6 /It {j, L) :;P
I AM OPPOSED
CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
~
Signature ) / ~v ,..,. )_) > }, l ;·3 ~k.),: ~-'
IC¥ \; :\_ --- /2 (
Signature
Address ,s,_3.9-_(p (3-y\:''i nt,:{ 'J:5&) Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue, 60
FEB O4 rrir,~
City Clerks Office
CITY OF MUSKEGON
STREET H-1561
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
CDBG APPLICATION FOR W AIYER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HOUSEHOLD INFOR1\1ATION
NameMit.t,l)(~,lb:Gt, u. )b ;1c~ Birthdate: 1-! :;-/:;.5
' Social Security #4,25 -9d_;J7J/'
Spouse: . ----·- ·---· . Birthdate: .-----· Social Security# ~c=:::_-_ _
AddressJ-/'.kJ (e {_7((,lf 11 {,(./IJt,'if? "'1 - __,_JJ
Phon~~')' 7.:.::-.-aJ
- 1J,::;-CJ Race:
,.-----~
Parcel#.-)"} '}i-U ") -~J.u ·OC\) I - Id Owner/Spouse Legally Handicapped Or{oisabled?, ( :-)Yes ( ) No
(Please refer to your assessment letter for this infonnation)
Number Living in Household: I List information for household members besides owner/spouse here.
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
. . .. .
. . . INCOME INFORMATION
ANNUAL Household Income: $ q{{/i (Y!
Wage earner:
(Must include all household income) 1 d t'.I. (_f)
Wage earner:
Wage earner:
Wage earner:
·.
Total: $ c11 ~.cc
PROPERTY INFORMATION .
Proof Of Ownership: ( ) Deed ( ) Mortgage ( ) Land Contract
Homeowner's Insurance Co: Expiration Date:
"
Property Taxes: ( ~) Current ( ) Delinquent Year(s) Due
(Property taxes must be cun"cnt to qualify and will be verified by CDBG staff)
.
·. O)VNER'S SIGNATURE .. .
Owner's Signature:( ,_} c~~ , '7 ') ,/_;J_, lJ /L V\._
<-: ..1 Date:
By signing this application, the applicant verifies he/she owns and occupies the dwelling. The Applicant/Owner certifies
that all information in this application, and all infonnation furnished in support of this application, is true and complete to the
best of the Applicant/Owner's knowledge and belief. The property owner's signature will be required prior to the application
being processed. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER APRIL 15, 2004
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) DATE CENSUS TRACT NO.
SIGNATURE TITLE
COMMENTS/REMARKS
**ATTENTION APPLICANT**
Please see reverse side for instructions on providing proof of income, ownership, and property insurance.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2488 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-210-002-0002-00
Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED I
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50 FEB 0 ,1 ·;r,n 1•
Property Description
City Clerks Office _J
CITY OF MUSKEGON
COMMUNITY PARK
A SUB DIV OF BLK 617 618 619
N 3 FT LOT 1 & ALL LOT 2
BLK 2
You, vote COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
CoOwner/Spouse
I AM OPPOSED ~
...:..IJ.:1..J.,ji.,1.....J..~:;..::::........___ ------------
Signature Signature
Address Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 47
/;,;f,ere. CU't. My f.,,'( do// u.rf <J & \ 11 j ?
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this c2rd by mnil, slmply fo!d on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2538 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-210-001-0001-00
Assessable Frontage: $41.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,441.15 FEB n i, ·;,"'''
Property Description
City Clerks OffiCf.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
COMMUNITY PARK
A SUB DIV OF BLKS 617 618 619
LOT 1 BLK 1
Y0Li1" vote COUNTS!
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED ~_
Owner --~~8,Poz; q:, H£<?;5tgq;!, CoOwner/Spouse -M1>i-rt(, A'..' fk6r}:icJM
S1gnatur~ /4/ ,' ;/:4 ·. '. ' ,-"/ l. Signature f),r/[((0.!/ o, i&pt<lcz.-,c,J'} (
('~m
c-
Address 1) ,/ '· . Address .;zaq,g it), Of/f,f. /~IA 11,/
7
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 40
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mnil, simp!y fo!d en the dotted !ines so the address on thP rF.!verse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2458 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-210-002-0006-00
Assessable Frontage: $60.00 Feet RECEIVED
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot I· IJ~ n / ;,r,nti
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,109.00
City Clerks Office_)
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
COMMUNITY PARK
A SUB DIV OF BLK 617 618 619
N 112 LOT 5 & ALL LOT 6
BLK 2
YoLir vote COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
0
Signature
Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 50
.:..,PECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mai!, simply fo!d on the dotterl lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2465 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-649-0002-00
Assessable Frontage: $44.54 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,565.58 RECEIVED
Property Description -D n ~-1
F1:n ·•r•,,1,
1 ' 11
l
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT AOF 1903
BLK 649
Ctty Clerks Office.J
LOT2
Your vvto COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
__ /
-//1,I:-_,(/::.- CoOwner/Spouse
I AM OPPOSED ~
Signature Signature
------------
Address Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 12
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this ::;3rd by m::ii!, simply fo!d on +he dotted lines so the :ciddress on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2382 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-395-002-0002-00
Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50
Property Description
City Clerks Olfic,
- ,C:..7.·~.:c,.,--:,-.=-
CITY OF MUSKEGON
GREENWOOD SUB DIV BEING
PART OF LOTS 1-2-3 & 4 BLK 620
LOT 2 BLK 2
Your vule COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
CoOwner/Spouse
I AM OPPOSED 0
~~..u.o.....i,...,...;.:::.:,~aa::_-- ------------
Signature Signature
Address Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 56
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BL VD. TO LAKES HORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return th!s card by m3!!, sirnp!y fo!d on the dottGd liilc3 ::;o the add;-c3s on the ieverse ~idt: is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2085 LAKESHORE DR
Parcel Number 24-205-636-0007-00
Assessable Frontage: $61.88 Feet
$35.15 per Foot
Estimated Front Foot Cost: RECEIVED
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,175.08
Property Description
City Clerks Office
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOT 7 BLK 636
Your voie CC•UNTS!
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed tltti;special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED 0
Owner ......:ais~~:;;.-,:_r~l,....;..';:.....,;i;..'.'.:~,,.i!.../4;..,;.;;s;..'...;..___ _ CoOwner/Spouse
Signature /l,f'-.......... ~ Signature
Address -z,:; s,~ L.k.,> ~ /),-... Address
75
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate wl1ether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the :ciddress on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2026 MORTON AVE
Parcel Number 24-205-638-0009-00
Assessable Frontage: $33.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,159.95
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOT 9 BLK 638 Cl Clerks Office
YJur vote COUNTS~
0
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED ©'
Owner °"J;j ~oOwner/Spouse Co 11/J F7 It If- ,Jo/4 ;zS:70.,
Signature Signature · ·;; · /, · · ·! ~0
.,. /;:-'//<&A· ,../ /.:,/ ( _ ,£,ra2":3e: 4-ik? c.-,/
Address C:/ go,rgi; /?2cJ y f? J.-::\__ Address ::) c),:;2 <:;;, /-1'16~ 7v
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. . · ·
167
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
--retttm·this· cardiby mai!, sfmp!y fold on the dotte-d lines so thELaddress on the reverse .side..is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2319 GREENWOOD ST
Parcel Number 24-035-400-0001-01
Assessable Frontage: $83.63 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
RECEIVED
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,939.59
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON C Clerks Office
SEC 35 T10N R17W
PT OF BLKS 617-620
DESC AS COM ATS 114 CCR
TH N 89D 18M 05S E ALG S LN OF SD SEC 1328 09 FT
TH N 00D 17M 00S E ALG E LN OF NEUMANNS SUB 511.41 FT
Yuw vols COUNTS'.
Owner
IAMINFAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Spec,al Assessment Street Paving Project//
-
IAMOPPOSED 0
Signature
Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 59
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
r6tum this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2169 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-642-0001-00
Assessable Frontage: $45.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot fiECEIVED
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,581.75
Property Description
City Clerks Office
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT 1903
BLK 642
NL Y 90 FT LOT 1
WITH W 19.60 FT OF MCCRACKEN ST
ABUTTING SO DESC LOT
'r • ,.....,,..._, ,, ,..,...,...,
! our '/Ole GUU!\I I;:).;
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special
I AM OPPOSED
~-~;;;=-.,;;;_-""";;;;;=~=-✓-~-
...(i,......_.L;:..........,......;~..i...:..i...;wu._,,poowner/Spou~_::··-::::::::::===:;;;;:;:::::__ _ __
Signature
32
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
;etw-r; this card by mai!, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the Address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2409 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-648-0001-00
Assessable Frontage: $58.50 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,056.28
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
BLK 648
E 110 FT LOT 1
EX S 183 FT THEREOF
Your vc,te COUNTC!
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED [Z]
Owner \)1fll(. l:iVf 11 I?, 0 ,&foOwner/Spouse ()e,b fC.c. ,S I R j (J Ko,.
Signature \f#r,f'uc/ / -Mf( r Signature Q f' k,._ s, 8,6(?);2,eA..,
Address t4of /ilc C1t11cl<o,/5f Address ;). L/ (J CJ !½ ccr~,,1 .St
17
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BL VD. TO LAKES HORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2493 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-649-0005-00
Assessable Frontage: $89.08 Feet RECEIVED
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,131.16
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
BLK 649
LOTS 5 & 6
Your vole COUNTS!
• w
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED
Owner 1 )j.\ Vh> /J.. (!1ci, cj>-i.,,-,1..CoOwner/Spouse
I ~~ - - - - - - - -
Signature / il - / · ,£
0 -----···
s·1gnat ure
,v/j!
~ £¥
, u.,,,/,:·--2.
~
Address
10
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
SPEC IA ....,...,MENT
HEARING , _,.:,i-JONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count , please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST. , SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mal!, simply fold on the dotted lines so the ;::idrlrn~s on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2175 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-642-0001 -10
Assessable Frontage: $100.50 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,532.58
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT 1903
BLK 642 LOT 1
ELY 64 FT OF LOTS 19 & 20
ELY 64 FT OF VAC 16.5 FT ALLEY BETWEE N SD LOTS 1 & 20 BLK 642
ALSO WL Y 19.6 FT OF MCCRACl<EN STREET ABUTTING SAME
Your vott:: COUNTS!
•
Please vote either iri favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM IN FAVOR // I AM OPPOSED ~
rv7
Owner <_-; ;~-- t
/ 2 A / 4 ~wner/Spouse
l/f, ill -----
Signature YCe2J u fl T ,cu, /4/2/k:C Signature
Address so /21 l!e5/2c:Jr.( £bl Address
M v1s /(€')uvt 1////; [.,/'J°{j{/t/ 31
Thank you for taking the time to v'ote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACl-<EN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return thb card by mail, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the address on thP rPv~rse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2264 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-639-0007-10 RECEIVED
Assessable Frontage: $66.00 Feet
•·-rrt{
I - I
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
C Clerks Off ice
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,319.90
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
BLK 639
SE 1/2 LOT 7
Your vole COUNTS!
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED ~ I
Owner f)t-·n n1\ V1rrfon. CoOwner/Spouse _Mti ··:1 \/1,m'i::;r,.
Signature J;l)i.1)\nw, zP. ' ']/,' ,1,_
. ft'~v Signature, 7Y)lj,1;,< ,i )/.t:-fnr'1.__}
1
{\~/· (··. /',.1r✓•.·1 r,.__. L\:Lr~1,-·1
Address d/' t;~'l/,,; /__'I IY/ G C
A/1,/i ro ( /".(-:/L.
• •. ,1/
Address " \ ,-
......;,'r-'l?i.,;..·
()
·i___,._~...:....:
' t....
··.:..f1~L;...' L..........._1:...,;;.;--;.;.r..;.;
1, ..:,
·_-,
~ i...;.;..
65
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
/
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT I (;,O
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST. , SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return thin c.::::rd by mail, simply fo!d on th!?- dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing . IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2564 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-645-000-0002-00 RECE\VED
Assessable Frontage: $40.00 Feet
rll\ ;
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35 .15 per Foot
City Clerks Office
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,406.00
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
NEUMANS SUBDIVISION OF BLK 616
LOT2
Yuui· vote COU~4TSl
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
//4/',f/.1r e 1 /ll!r/' ~r
I AM OPPOSED
CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
~
1
: :~~~:/ ~4?::tJ ::;,:::
/.'&~ ~ /4~ .,,y:7"/f'/
Thank you fw taking the time to vote on this important issue. 38
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
p
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST. , SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
,etum this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse $ide is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2003 HARDING AVE
Parcel Number 24-205-640-0007-00
Assessable Frontage: $48.50 Feet
$35.15 per Foot
Estimated Front Foot Cost: RECEIVED
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,704.78
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
City Clerks Office
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOT7
BLK 640
Your vote COUi,ffSl
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED IXI
Owner ...
....:..... ,✓
-:::~
.......
--P ~E-·....~--a.........~- - - - - - CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
....-.,......
Signature Signature
Address Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. ''1v,si,;.,.~-- '·• 62
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote co.unt, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST. ; SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sig n the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mall, simply fold on the dotted !!nes so the address on thP. reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2271 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-644-0001-10
Assessable Frontage: $100.50 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,532.58
Property Description
C ITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOTS 1 AND 10 BLK 644
ALSO 16.50 FT VAC ALLEY BETWEEN SD LOTS 1 AND 10
ALSO WLY 19.60 FT OF MCCRACKEN STREET ABUTTING SAME
EXC THE NLY 90 FT THEREOF
Your vole COLJ ~~TS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR
?.e<
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
/ . J # ~owner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
I AM OPPOSED ~ . I
Signature s;_. ,.,u [Jar(c.{f;f' /7 Signature
Address 50 41 /(f5WJrf. f> /uJ Address
tlvf l4 7 f1°"?& "I IM i '{'1c,fl(lf
ThanR-yod for taking the time to vote on this important issue. ,.,.•:•"-" -•· , ~, .!' , 25
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted lines so the adrlress on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2272 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-639-0008-00
Assessable Frontage: $66.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,319.90
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
BLK 639
NW 1/2 LOT 8
'{our vole COUNTS!
Address Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 64
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fo!d on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2006 HARDING AVE
Parcel Number 24-205-639-0008-10
Fl~ I-'. ,
-c_·.· : \ ('
. ·f ?iln!.
.
Assessable Frontage: $33.00 Feet
City ' '·ks Ottic.e
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,159.95
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
BLK 639
SE 1/2 LOT 8
Your vole COUNTSl
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM IN ~AVOR I AM OPPOSED ~
Owner ~.:YU:, "f JV~-1.r<-( CoOwner/Spouse ~) =·
Signature faili< -~ [/ lj':-z.7:('.
~- ·. 1 /7/J/l
. Signature J\.
Address . ? oar,; U/u:&r0 tibt-. Address J. tt e, l fl~T (1.fte..
63
Thank you for taking the tirf:"lto vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
rtilurn this CE.id by mc:i!, simp!y fo!d on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2355 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-64 7-0001-00
Assessable Frontage: $71.70 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,520.26 RECEIVED
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903 City Clerks Office
BLK 647
N 112 OF LOTS 1-2
Your vote COUNTS!
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED [8:1
Owner ~fi,/1.}c/~ 14 {L,r,e'.4N./ CoOwner/Spouse . /(r&KIt T (7-1) (VJ 6-.A l'\..
I /
Signature..___.-0a-,v{,:,_., a. c?<,,f'--<'Lc.•-V
/,
Address x ,., .,-.-;- 7:itflU<-,c~.)u,'/_ Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 20
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return thic card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2521 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-205-650-0002-00
Assessable Frontage: $81.54 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,866.13
RECEIVED
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
City Clerks Office
BLK 650
LOTZ
& N 37 FT OF LOT 3
Yuur vote COU~~TS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR
I VIII/
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
J_, ,5111/hlflJ
I AM OPPOSED
CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
lx]
,./ ,:J ~ -4 ,/
Signature Signature
0:'<tU?Z
\.., 2Y J/ <'.~tt-vf!,{
;
Address ,,'.lQ I Ill C d1NC/2:P,Y Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 8
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by moil, simply fold on the dotted !ines so the address on the reverse sirle is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2218 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number
RECEIVED
.24-205-638-0006-00
Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet FEB 0 n 1nn1,
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot City Clerks Office
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50
Property Description -·-=---.....,..-....
S)fJ8/:) Al!O
()'.)f)JO
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
BLK 638 ,c1 U:l:l
LOT6
EX SWLY 10 FTOF NWLY 82 FT I f--~ !\ :Jr')-~~-.J
& SEL Y 50 FT LOT 7 ..... ~ .• ·/ \.,.,_...i~,-•"···•<J
Yul.ii vot0 COUNTS!
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED , ✓,r
o_wner~.•.···rv#. ~~ CoOwner/Spouse -11½-!t s, /4$>f!9/cl=/>
Signature ~ > Signature ,:f!41;A) S o ~
Address .36eb Cw0nA'( d , /0 ~ Address 3bpt) C11-2vJ1('( (i uR ('),{
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 69
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
nciturn this card hy mc1il, sirnply fold on the dotted lines so the ilddress on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2563 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-779-001-0002-00
Assessable Frontage: $44.54 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
$1,565.58
RECEIVED
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST
Property Description
FEB o ci 7nn1,
CITY OF MUSKEGON City Clerks Office
SUB DIV OF BLK 651
LOT 2 BLK 1
'/oLir vota COUNTS!
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED IBJ
Owner c:ely,, fr/, J\Jd.son Co Owner/Spouse
------------
.
S 1gna ture CJ '
L/l·t-&-t't':7rQ /// l'
IL<-_,~ Signature
Address ,1,f,) l- 3 f) c.,Cr--.1 cke 0 Address
3
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mci!, simp!y fo!d on the dotted !ines s0 the ;cidrlrnss on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" n~
PROJECT. RECEIVED
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2480 MCCRACKEN ST FEB f\ ..
Parcel Number 24-210-002-0003-00 City Clerks Office
Assessable Frontage: $45.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
')fr'
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,581.75
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
COMMUNITY PARK
A SUB DIV OF BLK 617 618 619
LOT 3 BLK 2
Your vute COUt4TGt
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED IXI
Owner '(_l'-"1"-J""''°l.,.-,__L.:...I.:..;d....t...z-S~c.;..~.:.:"...I __
.CoGwflerfSpouse -'-!?i""'c'c,,;;.'l...
Signature Signature (J
', ._ v1 VI, \'' bY".<'\ ; 1> /-1/)1 i' - )
Address /✓-~/J- ;J)itc1/l ;f~J ;
. ~//u,Je~NJ ". _,Address
/ , ,,(-;,'cf~!
48
Thank you for taking the iime to vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1561
Project Title: McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
r6turn this cn~d by m::::i, simply fold or the ,:lotted lin<>s "O the cirldress on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2472 MCCRACKEN ST
Parcel Number 24-210-002-0004-00
Assessable Frontage: $70.60 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,481.59
Property Description RECEIVED
CITY OF MUSKEGON
COMMUNITY PARK
A SUB DIV OF BLK 617 618 619
LOT4
& S 1/2 LOT 5 __(2ity qlEJrks Office
BLK 2
Your vote COUNTS!
Owner
• .
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street P ,ng P~
I AM IN FAVOR
~!-c ( f11i-, Owner/Spouse
I AM OPPOSED
.
,/1 ·,
_,,;--.
Sigl").aiYfe- ~~::....._.~::-.,;.,="'""":;_-f,.4'- Signature
Address d c_( 7+ Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this impo1iant issue. 49
Date: Febrnmy 10,2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineeting
RE: Public Hearing
Create Special Assessment District for:
Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To hold a public hearing on the proposed special assessment of the Sherman Blvd.,
Lincoln St. to Beach St., and to create the special assessment district and appoint two City
Commissioners to the Board of Assessors if it is determined to proceed with the project
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To create the special assessment and assign two City Commissioners to the Board of
Assessors by adopting the attached resolution
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Resolution No. 2004-lB(e)
Resolution At First Hearing Creating Special Assessment District
For Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St.
Location and Description of Prope1iies to be Assessed:
See Exhibit A attached to this resolution
RECITALS:
I. A hearing has been held on February 10, 2004 at 5:30 o'clock p.m. at the City
Commission Chambers. Notice was given by mail and publication as required by
law.
2. That estimates of costs of the project, a feasibility report and valuation and benefit
information are on file with the City and have been reviewed for this hearing.
3. At the hearing held February JO, 2004, there were 60.14 % objections by the owners of
the property in the district registered at the hearing either in writing received before or at
the hearing or by owners or agents present at the hearing, and the Commission has
considered the advisability of proceeding with the project.
FINDINGS:
I. The City Commission has examined the estimates of cost to construct the project
including all assessable expenses and determines them to be reasonable.
2. The City Commission has considered the value of the property to be assessed and the
value of the benefit to be received by each prope1iy proposed to be assessed in the district
after the improvements have been made. The City Commission determines that the
assessments of costs of the City project will enhance the value of the properties to be
assessed in an amount at least equivalenfto the assessment and that the improveiiient
thereby constitutes a benefit to the property.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
I. The City Commission hereby declares a special assessment district to include the
prope1iy set fo1ih in Exhibit A attached to this resolution.
2. The City Commission determines to proceed with the improvements as set forth in the
feasibility study and estimates of costs, and directs the City Engineer to proceed with
project design, preparation of specifications and the bidding process. If appropriate and
if bonds are to be sold for the purposes of financing the improvements, the Finance
Department shall prepare plans for financing including submission of application to the
Michigan Depaiiment of Treasury and the beginning of bond proceedings.
3. The City Commission hereby appoints a Board of Assessors consisting of City
Commissioners Davis Larson
and ----===-=-=------
and the City Assessor ,vl10 are hereby directed to prepare an assessment roll.
Assessments shall be made upon front foot basis.
4. Based on the City's Special Assessment policy and preliminary estimates it is expected
that approximately 7.27% of the cost of the street improvement will be paid by special
assessments.
5. Upon submission of the special assessment roll, the City staff is hereby directed to notify
all owners and persons interested in properties to be assessed of the hearing at which the
City Commission will consider confirmation of the special assessment roll.
This resolution adopted.
Ayes Spataro, Warmington, Carter, Davis, Gawron, Larson, Shepherd
Nays None
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By~ O.~
L
Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on February 10, 2004.
The meeting was properl y held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of
Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By ~Q. ~Gail A. Kundinger,Clerk
EXHIBIT A
Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
All properties abutting that section of Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St..
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
) ss
COUNTY OF MUSKEGON )
TO CREATE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FOLLOWING:
Sherman Blvd.;. Lincoln St. to Beach St.
THE DEPONENT SAYS THAT THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED UPON
EACH OWNER OF OR PARTY IN INT EREST IN PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED IN
THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHOSE NAME APPEARS UPON THE
LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON BY
MAILING SUCH NOTICE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE BY FIRST CLASS UNITED
STA TES MAIL, WITH POSTAGE PREPAID, ADDRESSED TO EACH SUCH
OWNER OR PARTY IN INTEREST AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON SAID LAST
TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS BY DEPOSITING THEM IN AN OFFICIAL
UNITED STATES MAIL RECEPTACLE ON THE 30TH DAY OFL AR Y, 2004.
. . ~
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
//t/2 DAY OF hb
r u t:1 r 't!.-
C7
, 2004.
dA1&0i g{) . I~
NOTARY PUBLIC, MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES </ - :2 S- 0 k
LOCATION MAP
-- .
MUSKEGON COUNTRY CLUB
GOLF COURSE
PROJECT LOCATION
ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY
For
Sherman Blvd., Lincoln St. to Beach St.
The reconstruction of Sherman Blvd. between Lincoln and Beach street, see attached exhibit,
was initiated by the City due to the conditions of the pavement and the need to reestablish some
type of a shoulder to accommodate pedestrian traffic. The existing pavement has deteriorated to
a level where a total reconstruction is necessary; resurfacing will result in the reappearance of
reflective cracking shortly after paving. This section of road has not had, to the best of our
records, any major work since the late sixties or early seventies before it became a City Road.
The proposed improvements (reconstruction) consist of following;
I. Complete removal of existing pavement and replace with a new asphalt street section that
would include curb & gutter and a proposed width of 37' back to back. The additional width
of one foot might be utilized in the future for a turn lane if the need arises. However, for the
time being it would be used for an on street parking where permissible.
2. Minor water main upgrades and about ] I-service to be replace.
A memo from the Assessor's office, which addresses the appraisal and benefit information, is
attached. Please take notice that the Equalization department felt that the Country Club receives
not benefits from the proposed improvements assessment and therefore no assessment should be
levied against that property.
The preliminary cost estimate for the work associated with paving is approximately $525,000
with the length of the project being approximately 3900 lineal feet (project length) or 1085.50 of
assessable footage. This translates into an estimated improvement cost of $484 per assessable
foot. The assessment figure will be at a cost not to exceed $35.15 per assessable foot as
established in the 2004 Special Assessment for this type of improvement
MUSKEGON COUNTY
173 E. APPLE AVE., BUILDING C, MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN 49442
M C H G A N (231 I 724-6386
FAX (231) 724-1129
EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Paul T. Baade, Chair
Bill Gill, Vice-Chair
Douglas A. Bennett
Charles L. Buzzell
James J. Derezinski
Marvin R. Engle
Louis A. McMurray
January 28, 2004
Robert Scolnik
I. John Snider II
Stephen R. Wisniewski
Mohammed Al-Shatel, City Engineer
City of Muskegon
933 Terrace Street
Muskegon,MI49443
Mr. Al-Shatel:
In accordance with your request, I have examined the proposed special assessment district entailing
the reconstruction of W Sherman Boulevard between Lincoln Street and Beach Street. The purpose
ofthis analysis is to document the reasonableness ofthls special assessment district by identifying
and quantifying any accrued benefits. It is subject to the normal governmental restrictions of
escheat, taxation, police power and eminent domain. The effective date is January 28, 2004.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the special assessment amounts justly and reasonably represents
the accrued benefits to the properties encompassed by thls project except the Muskegon Country
Club parcel. The Muskegon Country Club parcel has no entrance on W Sherman Boulevard and
the golf course comes up to the trees and fence along W Sherman Boulevard. All of their buildings
are on the Lakeshore Drive side of the parcel and I feel there isn't any benefit to thls parcel due to
the reconstruction project. Therefore, the parcel's linear footage has not been considered in the
value of the project. The amounts reflect the sum of the immediate estimated value enhancement
and the intrinsic value that will accrue from an overall increase in property values due to an
improved quality of life created by the proposed project. As previously presented, the proposed
special assessment district encompasses primarily a commercial golf course and residential
properties. The front foot rate of $3 5 .15 for the reconstruction of the above mentioned project
area, less the frontage for the golf course property, appears rea~onable in light of an analysis that
indicates a possible enhancement of$36.69. The conclusions are based upon the data presented
withln thls limited analysis in restricted format, and on supporting information in my files.
Sincerely,
J~ Q_~_,_~
Vicki A Emery, CMAE 3 - - Cf
Senior Appraiser
TDD (231) 722-4103 • An EEO/ ADA/ AA Employer
recycled paper
January 30, 2004
Dear :OWNERS NAME
OWNERS ADDRESS
OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE, OWNERS ZIPCODE 1
The City of Muskegon is asking for your support for improvement of the street adjoining your
property located at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET.
The City of Muskegon believes that by making the proposed street improvements you will
have less road noise, dust, and wear and tear on your vehicle. In addition, street
improvements provide easier access for delivery of services such as snow plowing, mail
delivery, and bus service.
Called a special assessment district, the largest percentage of the proposed street
improvement will be paid for by the City of Muskegon (via local funds and or grants); however,
it will be necessary for you to cover a share of the cost (which you can spread over a period of
ten years) based on the amount of property you own bordering the street. A description of the
project, including the associated cost to you and the City, is located in the documents
attached to this letter.
While the City of Muskegon believes that the proposed improvements will result in a safer and
cleaner street while adding curb appeal to your property, you do have the right to ask further
questions, decline, or protest participation in this particular project. Please carefully review the
enclosed materials and call the City's Engineering Department at 724-6707 or your ward
commissioner if you require more information.
A public hearing is also scheduled for this project on FEBRUARY 10, 2004. If you attend this
public hearing you will be given an opportunity to present your questions and potential
concerns on the proposed special assessment district to the commission.
Also located in this packet of materials is a Special Assessment Hearing Response Card. If
mailed back to the City of Muskegon City Clerk's Office before the scheduled public hearing
your vote will be added to the tabulation of votes during the public hearing. If you do not send
in this form your vote counts as "in favor" of the project.
Thank you for your participation in improving the quality of life in the Muskegon community.
January 30, 2004
OWNERS NAME
OWNERS ADDRESS
OWNERS CITY, OWNERS STATE OWNERS ZIPCODE 1
Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX: at PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET
NOTICE OF HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Dear Property Owner:
The Muskegon City Commission is considering whether or not to create a special
assessment district which would assess your property for the following paving project:
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
The proposed special assessment district will be located as follows:
All parcels abutting Sherman Blvd .. from Lincoln St. to Beach St.
It is proposed that a portion of the above improvement will be paid by special
assessment against properties in the aforementioned district. Following are conditions
of the proposed special assessment which are important to you.
Public Hearings
An initial public hearing to consider the creation of a special assessment district will be
held at the City of Muskegon City Commission Chambers on FEBRUARY 10, 2004 at
5:30 P.M. You are encouraged to appear at this hearing, either in person, by agent or
in writing to express your opinion, approval, or objection concerning the proposed
special assessment. We are enclosing a Hearing Response Card for you to indicate
your agreement or opposition to the special assessment. This card includes the
property identification and description, assessable footage per City policy, and the
estimated cost of the assessment. You may also appear, as above, in lieu of, or in
addition to mailing your response card to the City Clerk. Written objections or
appearances must be made at or prior to the hearing. NOTE: THE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT WILL BE CREATED OR NULLIFIED AT THIS HEARING. IT IS
IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO COMMENT AT THIS HEARING IF YOU WANT YOUR
OPINION COUNTED FOR THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT.
A second public hearing will be held, if the district is created, to confirm the special
assessment roll after the project is completed. You will be mailed a separate notice for
the second hearing. At this second hearing the special assessment costs will be spread
on the affected properties accordingly. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU
HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT AMOUNT AGAINST YOUR
PARCEL EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THIS HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT ROLL IS CONFIRMED AT THE SECOND HEARING, YOU WILL HAVE
THIRTY (30} DAYS FROM THE DATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE ROLL TO FILE A
WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER,
UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THE INITIAL HEARING OR AT THE SECOND HEARING
CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY AGENT, OR IN WRITING
BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE MICHIGAN TAX
TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST.
By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the properties to be assessed
shall object to the assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall
not be made unless the City Commission determines by affirmative vote of all its
members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the improvement.
Estimated Costs
The total estimated cost of the street portion of the project is $525,000.00 of which
approximately 7.27% ($38,155.33) will be paid by special assessment to property
owners. Your property's estimated share of the special assessment is shown on the
attached hearing response card. The remaining costs will be paid by the City.
The street assessment, which covers improvements to the roadway, may be paid in
installments over a period of up to ten (10) years. Any work on drive approaches or
sidewalks will be assessed to the property at actual contract prices and these costs may
also be paid in installments over ten (10) years. Please note this work is in addition to
the street special assessment.
Please refer to the enclosed sheet entitled Special Assessment Payment Options for
more information on the payment options and financial assistance programs available.
I urge you to return the enclosed hearing response card indicating your preference and
to attend the scheduled public hearing. Your views are important to the City and to your
neighbors. Additional information, including preliminary project plans and cost
estimates is available in the Engineering Department located on the second floor of City
Hall. Regular business hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday
except holidays.
Sincerely,
~~~/41
Mohammed AI-Shatel, P.E.
City Engineer
1
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: PROPERTY ADDRESS & STREET
Parcel Number 24-XXX-XXX-XXXX-XX
Assessable Frontage: $105.50 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,708.33
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOTS 8 AND 9 BLK 686
ANDS 112 OF ADJ VAC ALLEY ABUTTING SD LOTS
Your vote COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR • I AM OPPOSED •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
Signature
----------- CoOwner/Spouse
Signature
-------------
Address Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
STREET H-1531
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. to BEACH ST.
CDBG APPLICATION FOR W AIYER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
. HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION .
Name: Birthdate: Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Spouse: Birthdatc: Social Security# _ _-_ _-_ _
Address: Phone: Race:
Parcel# Owner/Spouse Legally Handicapped Or Disabled? ( )Yes ( ) No
(Please refer to your assessment letter for this infonnation)
Number Living in Household: List information for household members besides owner/spouse here.
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdatc Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
Name Birthdate Social Security # _ _-_ _-_ _
-,-c
. INCOME INFORMATION ·.
ANNUAL Household Income: $ Wage earner:
(Must include all household income)
Wage earner:
Wage earner:
Wage earner:
Total: $
..
.
I. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Proof Of Ownership: ( ) Deed ( ) Mortgage ( ) Land Contract
Homeowner's Insurance Co: Expiration Date:
Property Taxes: ( ) Current ( ) Delinquent Year(s) Due
(Property taxes must be cmTent to qualify and will be verified by CDBG .staff)
··
..
OWNER'S SIGNATURE .
Owner's Signature: Date:
By signing this application, the applicant verifies he/she owns and occupies the dwelling. The Applicant/Owner certifies
that all infonnation in this application, and all information furnished in support of this application, is true and complete to the
best of the Applicant/Owner's knowledge and belief. The property owner's signature will be required prior to the application
being processed. NO APPLICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER APRIL 15, 2004
. ~
. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY .. .
APPROVED ( ) DENIED ( ) DATE CENSUS TRACT NO.
SIGNATURE TITLE
COMMENTS/REMARKS
**ATTENTION APPLICANT**
Please see reverse side for instructions on providing proof of income, ownership, and property insurance.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
STREET- H-1531
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
REQUEST FOR WAIYER OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Note: You may receive this application several times -Ifyou have already applied, please discard.
Dear Resident:
The City of Muskegon has selected the street abutting your propetiy for repairs. To assist homeowners, who
may have difficulty paying the cost of street repairs, the City offers assessment waivers through the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for eligible households and families. lfyou meet the CDBG
program qualifications, the City may pay the street assessment for you to the extent that funds are available.
Application Requirements:
✓ Applicants must submit proof that their total household income does not exceed 65% of Area Median
Income (see chmi below); Proof of income may include copies of Wage & Tax Statement (W-2's) from the year
2003, pension or other benefit checks, bank statements for direct deposits or agency statements for all household
income.
2002
165% MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME CHART I
FAMILY SIZE INCOME LIMIT
I $27,885
2 31,850
3 35,880
4 39,845
5 43,030
6 46,326
7 49,400
8 52,585
For each extra, add 3,185
✓ Applicants must submit proof that they both own and occupy property at the time of application; Land
Contract purchasers must obtain approval of titleholder prior to receiving assistance. Proof of ownership should be
a deed, m01igage, or land contract; proof of occupancy can be a copy of a driver's license or other official
document showing both your name and address.
✓ Applicants must submit proof of current property insurance.
Please complete the first four (4) sections of the application on the reverse side of this notice, and return it, along with
suppotiing documentation, to: City of Muskegon
Community & Neighborhood Services
933 Terrace Street, 2nd Floor
Muskegon, MI 49440
For further information, please contact this office by calling 724-6717, weekdays from 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
The City reserves the right to verifj: all application iJ?formation, and to reject any applications that contain falsified il?/Ormation or insufficient
doc11111entation.
Special Assessment Payment Options
Property owners in the City of Muskegon who are being specially assessed for street, sidewalk or other public
improvements may pay their assessment in the following ways:
I. Lump Sum Payment in Full
Assessments may be paid in full within sixty (60) days of the confirmation of the special assessment roll
without interest.
II. Installment Payments
Assessments not paid within the first sixty (60) days may be paid in installments over several years as follows:
Street and Alley Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments. For example, if the
amount of your assessment is $850.00, you will be billed $85.00 per year plus applicable interest as
described below.
Driveway, Sidewalk, and Approach Assessments - Ten (10) years equal annual principal payments
plus applicable interest as described below.
Interest- Simple interest is charged at the rate of 5.00% per year unless the City has borrowed money
to complete the project for which you are assessed and has pledged you assessments for repayment of
the borrowed money. In such cases, the interest you are charged is equal to the interest rate the City
must pay on the borrowed money plus 1.00%.
Ill. Special Assessment Deferral (Low Income Seniors and Disabled Persons)
To qualify for a special assessment deferral you or your spouse (if jointly owned) must:
• Be 65 years or older or be totally or permanently disabled.
• Have been a Michigan resident for five (5) years or more and have owned and occupied the homestead
being assessed for five (5) years or more.
• Be a citizen of the U.S.
• Have a total household income not in excess of $16,823.00
• Have a special assessment of $300.00 or more.
Under this program the State of Michigan will pay the entire balance owing of the special assessment,
including delinquent, current, and further installments. At the time of payment a lien will be recorded on your
property in favor of the State of Michigan. Repayment to the State must be made at the time the property is
sold or transferred or after the death of the owner(s). During the time the special assessment is deferred
interest is accrued at the rate of 6.00% per year.
IV. Further Information About the Above Programs
Further information about any of the above payment options may be obtained by calling either the City
Assessor's Office at 724-6708 or the City Treasurer's Office at 724-6720. Applications may be obtained at
the Muskegon County Equalization Office in the Muskegon County building or City of Muskegon Assessor's
Office in City Hall.
V. Additional Special Assessment Payment Assistance
Qualified low and moderate income homeowners who are being assessed may be eligible for payment
assistance through the City of Muskegon Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Assistance
from this program will be available to the extent that funds are available. To obtain further information and
determine whether you are eligible, contact the Community and Neighborhood Services Department at
724-6717.
CITY or MUSKEGON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
IN AN EFFORT TOWARDS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT, the Muskegon City Commission is
proposing that special assessment districts be created for the following projects:
BEIDLER ST., LAKETON AVE. TO SOUTHERN AVE.
McCRACKEN ST., SHERMAN BLVD. TO LAKESHORE DR.
AND
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
The specific locations of the special assessment districts and the propetties proposed to be assessed are:
All parcels abutting Beidler St. from Laketon Ave. to Southern Ave.
All parcels abutting McCracken St. from Sherman Blvd. to Lakeshore Dr.
And
All parcels abutting Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln St. to Beach St.
The City Commission proposes that the City and prope1ty owners by means of special assessments will
share the cost of improvement. You may examine preliminary plans and cost estimates in the City Hall's
Engineering Department during regular business hours - between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on weekdays,
except holidays.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE MUSKEGON CITY
COMMISSION CHAMBERS ON FEBRUARY 10, 2004 AT 5:30 O'CLOCK P.M
PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST YOUR ASSESSMENT
EITHER IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT THE HEARING. IF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
ROLL IS CONFIRMED (AT A LATER HEARING) YOU WILL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF THE ROLL'S CONFIRMATION TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE
MICHIGAN STATE TAX TRIBUNAL. HOWEVER, UNLESS YOU PROTEST AT THIS HEARING
OR AT THE HEARING CONFIRMING THE ROLL, EITHER IN PERSON, BY YOUR AGENT OR
REPRESENTATIVE, OR IN WRITING BEFORE OR AT THE HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO
APPEAL TO TI-IE MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL WILL BE LOST.
By City Charter, if the owners of more than one-half of the property to be assessed shall object to the
assessment in writing at or before the hearing, the improvement shall not be made unless the City Commission
determines by affirmative vote of all its members that the safety or health of the public necessitates the
improvement.
PUBLISH: January 31, 2004 Gail Kundinger, City Clerk
ADA POLICY
The City will provide necessary appropriate auxiliary aids and services, for example, signers for the hearing
impaired, audiotapes for the visually impaired, etc., for disabled persons who want to attend the meeting, upon
twenty-four hours notice to the City. Contact:
Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Ml 49440
(23 I) 724-6705 or TDD (23 I) 724-6773
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT H 1531
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
1 MURPHY CHAD/RITA L ASSESSABLE FEET: 105.5
24-205-686-0008-00 2596 W SHERMAN BL VD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2596. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,708.33 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 9.7190
2 RAHRIG EUGENE ASSESSABLE FEET: 100
24-205-686-0010-00 2572 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2572. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,515.oo 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 9.2123
3 KNOP MARY K ASSESSABLE FEET: 100
24-205-686-0012-00 2566 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2566. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,515.oo 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 9.2123
4 MCMILLEN DONALD JR/GLENNA ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-205-686-0014-00 2550 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2550. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.6062
5 SHIELDS JAMES J ASSESSABLE FEET: 49
24-205-685-0011-00 2586 FOUNTAIN ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2586. FOUNTAINS MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,722.35 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.5140
6 BENEDICT VICTORIA ASSESSABLE FEET: 49.84
24-205-685-0012-00 2520 W SHERMAN BL VD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2520. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,751.88 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.5914
7 OPLINGER PAUL/SHEILA E ASSESSABLE FEET: 52.74
24-205-685-0013-00 2516 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2516. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ~I_$_1_,8_5_3._81~
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.8586
1/30/2004 Page 1 of 3
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
8 LAIRD DONALD R TRUST ASSESSABLE FEET: 51.75
24-205-685-0014-00 2510 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2510. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: LI _$_1.:,_,8_19_.0_1.....,
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.7674
9 HALLMAN WENDELL M ASSESSABLE FEET: 49.74
24-205-685-0015-00 2500 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2500. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,748.36 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.5822
10 KAMP PAUL ASSESSABLE FEET: 51.75
24-205-685-0016-00 2494 W SHERMAN BL VD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2494. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ._I _$_1.:....,8_19_.0_1__,
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.7674
11 MASKELL ROBERT M ASSESSABLE FEET: 51.74
24-205-685-0017-00 2488 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2488. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,818.66 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.7665
12 JACOBSON MARK L ASSESSABLE FEET: 49.74
24-205-685-0018-00 2480 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2480. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,748.36 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.5822
13 BARDING JACK ASSESSABLE FEET: 51.7
24-205-685-0019-00 2474 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2474. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,811.25 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.7628
14 MORTENSON MARGARET C ASSESSABLE FEET: 50
24-205-685-0020-00 2587 GROVE ST COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2587. GROVE ST MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,757.50 1
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.6062
1/30/2004 Page 2 of 3
RECONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 2004
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
ONSTOTT MELVIN ASSESSABLE FEET: 100
15
24-205-670-0007-00 2442 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2442. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $3,515.oo I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 9.2123
ASSESSABLE FEET: 47
16 HARKER ANNE M
24-205-670-0009-00 2432 W SHERMAN BLVD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2432. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,652.05 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 4.3298
ASSESSABLE FEET: 75
17 MOAT JOSEPH B
24-205-670-0010-00 836 DYKSTRA RD COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2414. W SHERMAN B MUSKEGON Ml 49445 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,636.25 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 6.9093
MUSKEGON COUNTRY CLUB ASSESSABLE FEET: 0
18
24-205-694-0001-00 2801 LAKESHORE DR COST PER FOOT: $35.15
@ 2801. LAKESHOR MUSKEGON Ml 49441 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $0.00 I
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FRONTAGE 0.0000
SUM OF ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE: 1085.50 SUM OF ESTIMATED P.O. COST: $38. 155.33 I
TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE PARCELS 18.00
1/30/2004 Page 3 of 3
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By · FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
reiUrn this card by maii, simpiy fuid un tlie dotted iines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2520 W SHERMAN BLVD
Parcel Number 24-205-685-0012-00
Assessable Frontage: $49.84 Feet RECEIVED
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot J:Tp rl /
''--'.' (
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,751.88
City Clerks Office
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
E 1 FT LOT 11 ALL LOT 12 EXE 1.16 FT BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING
Your VO\e COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR
)\
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
,·;::,:u ., _ o_ \0.,&; ~ CoOwner/Spouse
I AM OPPOSED 00
Signature \ , ) \f\'l,\\l:S,:>,4~:?J\\ ~ \ Signature
------------
Address ✓-
<
r,,c,>
J::}
1 ·,
U,..J ,
0 \,
,-)\\9,j\ 'IT:,,t, \ \
Address
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 6
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: · H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
·--c··---------·- - -cs· ,-felU-f1YtfliS"C8tCrbSTYtf8ff~--sititply ·roiti -Off the dotted iin8s so lhEf address tJ"t1- tile ·r-e·v~fge-:gi'd"Ef is
showing. Be sure to sea.I the forrn with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2442 W SHERMAN BLVD
Parcel Number 24-205-670-0007-00
Assessable Frontage: $100.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost:. · $35.15 per Foot .RECEIVED
ESTIMATE[) TOTAL cost $3,515.00
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
· c· Clerks Office
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOTS 7 & 8 BLK 670
& S 112 OF VACATED ALLEY
ABUTTING SAID LOTS
Your vote COUNTS!
I AM IN FAVOR •
· Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED ~
o_wner .
. Signature
·. /vf~
~~-IP~_
~c1f$&~
1 .= oOwn~r/Spouse
Signature
Address ~';(,t;&,;'.i ~c{4rlt Address -----------------
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 15
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Title:
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forWarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
··return this cartl i:Yy mail, sirtipiy foidot1 ihe Jolted lines so the address on the reverse side is- ·~'-·
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2500 W SHERMAN BLVD
Parcel Number 24-205-685-0015-00
Assessable Frontage: $49.74 Feet
$35.15 per Foot RECEIVED
Estimated Front Foot Cost:
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,748.36
Property Description c Clerks Office
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
E 46.67 FT LOT 15 &
LOT 16 EXE 46.93 FT BLK 685
ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING
lour vote COUNTS!
Owner
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street PaVing Project.
____________ CoOwner/Spouse
I AM OPPOSED rx I
~"'="(;)\~\\,/-,..,, .. ·.· •
Signature Signature V,l'mt,J;t . jki~ .
Address Address ,o 5 Oo . w', J)zldDl/,Vll ·.·.····~
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
"?nu~· ~
'Y:;: 111 4 1
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR!' OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONS'fRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. 10
· •· ~ •• · return this card by maii, sifnpiy fold on ihe ciolle<l lines su the addrnss on the teverse side Is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJEC'f.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2432.W SHERMAN BLVD
Parcel Number 24-205-670-0009-00
Assessable Frontage: · $47.00 Feet·
Estimated Front F=oot Cost: $35.15 per Foot RECEIVED
ESTIMATED .T0TAL COST . $1,652.05
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
City Clerks Office
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOT 9 & S 112 OF VACATED ALLEY ABUTTING BLK 670
Your vote COUNTS<
j/1)!1 e 111, llcu, f!.e;-;,
IN FAVOR • ·
. ,
1
..JL1J
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project..
I AM
I AM OPPOSED
rz::l
Owner i~VJ/..41.tl JJ; ~,,,;f;~,.j CoOwner/Spouse
Signature . (t;;_.µ.-?Jt..·~I.,,,
71,,.· 1 ;
Signatum
---------------;....,.---
Address
Address .
Thank you for taking ihe time to vote on this importan-t-is-su_e.;.._........---.-,.-,___....._1_6___
.SPECIAL. ASSE:SSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
(\JC) RESPONSECOUNTS AS 0IN FAVOR'' OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, plEl~Sa .
. Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004 ·•
··Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO ~EACH ST.
•• .. Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
. INSTRUCTIONS
If yi:Ju.wishtohave your written vote included as part of the tabulationof votesforward'ed to .
the City Commission for the sche.duled pubHc hearing, please return this card bythe c:Jate
· indicated above ..·To use this response card please indicatewhetheryou Oppose or i"~yor
this spedal assessment project,sign the form andreturn it to the City Clerk's Office.
·. returhtnis card by ma11, simpiy foid Ufftl1e dotted lines so the-<idd1e.,s unttwrev&rse:s{!1e1iiri•-"~•cC.'T ·
ro.
showing .. Be sure to seal the form. withJl small piece of tape or staple prior to ma.iijtir;j;,IF . .
YOUDONOTSENDIN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF . •.
PROJECT.. . .
Assessment· Irifcfrmatlon
Property Address: 2586 FOUNTAIN ST
Parcel Number 24°205~685°0011-QQ
Assessable Frontage: $49.00 Feet
. Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 · per Fdqf
RECEIVE • .·
ESTIMATED T6tAL COST $1;722.35 FEB (l[,;
· Property Description
Ci1y Clerks Offlco1 ·.··
CITY oFMUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903 . . ..
LOTH EXE 1 FT BLK685 ALSO S 1/2 OFVAC.ALLEY ,'\BUTTING
Your VOie COUNTS!
. . Please vote either infavor or oppbsed to the Special Assess merit street P~ving<Ptcije~L
. l•AMINFAVOR[J IAMOPPOSED· 1>?1
·Owh!;lr Owner/Spouse ________.,..,......,
...............-........_......
Signature'•._· ~!C~~~-2~1.t!!.~-:V Signature
Address · · Address
. Thi:fnkyollfor taking the time fovote on this important issue, · , ,,.,' , 5
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by maii, sil'npiy foiU tu I the duUeU lint:!;:, so the addtess vi-• th..:.. . _. . . . 1·3e side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2474 W SHERMAN BLVD
Parcel Number 24-205-685-0019-00
Assessable Frontage: $51.70 Feet RECEIVED
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,817.26 City Clerks Office
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
E 43.7 FT LOT 19 & LOT 20 EXE 50 FT BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING
Your vote CUUNIS!
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED~
Owner
Signature
Address
13
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. '
< - ~ 0r? ~ d CZ 0 a-<-£¼.17v-?-n ,4Jff; ~4-t-~
?hi 11-i--e~~ a- q ~ ~~ /4 z~
a,o ,;;:;/J "
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return tnis card by maii, sirnµiy foid 0i·1 the dotted lines sc the address on the reverse sirle is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2572 W SHERMAN BLVD
Parcel Number 24-205-686-0010-00
Assessable Frontage: $100.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
RECEIVED
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $3,515.00
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON City Clerks Office
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
LOTS 10 AND 11 BLK 686
ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ADJ THERETO
Your vote COUNTS!
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM IN FAVOR
.-\ /
I AM OPPOSED~
Owner £ tl '1' e /\. 't Lu'. 'a,_ 'l , <J CoOwner/Spouse
Signature (~_,i4 ..r , ;, · .~.,.(;:?,7/~ature
r .
Address ~) i:; 'J ~3 [,(I ·•-ii< ,LCt''<v-.J Address
2
11V\M l\.>-.,-'--",,--~'U,y•,_<l.,_
·_/\ . ) -
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by mail, s1mp1y fold on me dotted iines so the address on the reverse side is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2587 GROVE ST RECEIVED
Parcel Number 24-205-685-0020-00 FEfl (\ r,
Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet
City Clerks Office
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEGON RECEIVED
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
E 50 Ff LOT ?.O BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING
FEB 9 2004
by Muskegon County
Your vote COUNTS!
•
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM IN FAVOR I AM OPPOSED [±]
Owner --· ·. !A./i it; -i: (.7!.\'v},Ci!r :, CoOwner/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
1
Signature-{'.f_ t:!Jul:c! 71;.::.·0~~~,1:/
;
Signature
Address '_J_j:1 ] (l /\,<..' J r.c: S/ i~ 0 0 /;- Address
14
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD. , LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special a~;sessrnent project., sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by maii, simply foid on ihe lio iLt:d iir1es ~u lht:: adur~6s ;:>n the i·c··1ei·s;:; side ls
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
RECEIVED
Property Address: 2494 W SHERMAN BLVD CITY OF MUSKEGON
Parcel Number 24-205-685-0016-00 FEB O9 2004
Assessable Frontage: $51. 75 Feet ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Estimated Front Foot Cost: $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,819.0'1 .
Property Description
·RECEIVED
CITY OF MUSKEGON
REVISED PLAT OF 1903
FEB OA JMk .
E 46.93 FT LOT '16 & LOT 17 EX E 45.1 8 FT BLK 685 ALSO S 1/2 OF VAC ALLEY ABUTTING
Cl Cl.erks Office
Your vote COUNTS!
I AM IN FAVOR
/1
•
7 ---2 /
-- /
.
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED IXf
Owner .:r_.VrY'./:~ ~/2 a -T Ow~~r/Spouse _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Signature tll. :-~ :✓--· /.., ~-l/ / .:>Ignature
Address
10
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING RESPONSE CARD
NO RESPONSE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF PROJECT-To have your vote count, please
Return This Card By FEBRUARY 10, 2004
Project Number: H 1531
Project Title: SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
Project Description RECONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS
If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
return this card by maii, sirr1piy fuk.i on ti~,e Uotted lines so the addiess on the reverse s!do is
showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing. IF
YOU DO NOT SEND IN THIS FORM YOUR VOTE COUNTS AS "IN FAVOR" OF
PROJECT.
Assessment Information
Property Address: 2550 W SHERMAN BLVD
Parcel Number 24-205-686-0014-00
Assessable Frontage: $50.00 Feet
Estimated Front Foot Cost: · $35.15 per Foot
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,757.50
Property Description
CITY OF MUSKEG ------~-- -·c-;;:::=---,
REVISED PLAT OF 1903RECEIVE-o
LOT 14 BLK 686 A SO
S 1/2 OF VAC ALL Y ADJ THERETO
, r!1
City Clerks Office our vote COUNTS!
I AM IN FAVOR •
Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
I AM OPPOSED ~
Owner ()N, ;,- [ .( C /•y( ((__ W\ ' 1l e/v CoOwner/Spouse G,l 0 '" ,:t, ;+ -P;;). f!}l c., )'V/ f /{ {; ,o
Signature
'
C-QL'? J £ (:7 IJ\Wc-l/\LLll"--. Signature .j,(1:Jc/:'.b•<-/ /2' J?7 ';./} 'k(tL,,.J
Address rM<o Lt' s ;1--c, 1¼1'111 JV Address .).,$(Sc L,i), S )fEP-,1½ t"I 1v
Thank you for taking the time to vote on this important issue. 4
(!)
c.2¥~1~( )
~,,£, ''l..)
/ ' ~~? '~~PC
-~
;?;Jf~ft~'7
ifl 3 /- 73~5-vff 7 Y
H-1531 SHERMAN BLVD., LINCOLN ST. TO BEACH ST.
PROPERTY OWNER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TABULATION
FEET PERCENTAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS -18
FOR OPPOSE
LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET LETTER#ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET
TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE 1085.500 1<W-k
5 2586 FOUNTAIN 24-205-685-0011-00 49.00
14 2587 GROVE 24-205-685-0020-00 50.00
FRONT FEET OPPOSED 547.33 50.42% (.oO, / 4" ·"fe 16 2432 SHERMAN 24-205-670-0009-00 47.00
15 2442 SHERMAN 24-205-670-0007 -00 100.00
RESPONDING FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 0.000 0.00% 10 2494 SHERMAN 24-205-685-0016-00 51.75
9 2500 SHERMAN 24-205-685-0015-00 49.74
NOT RESPONDING - FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 538.170 49.58% 6 2520 SHERMAN 24-205-665-0012-00 49.84
4 2550 SHERMAN 24-205-086-0014-00 50.00
TOTAL FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 538.170 49.58% 2 2572 SHERMAN 24-205-686-0010-00 100.00
q
;;,. "
cc
0
"-
'f;-
()
t- s
~
C
q
q
_., ~
C
,o
C
"
C
0
\
= "--
"--
(
<
s'. ----bz
-?
• .2 ~ )
~
t
C
ci
'
) § ~ " ~
1 t
_..I,
)
T,LS
~
-2
j
'{_ -~
's...'; -7)
<J <::)
_;
• 0.00 547.33
""'=--,· l"'
0
C V)
V]
i'. ~-
~ vi. )
C ~
_j)
c- ,--;;:
-~
-" -:-t)
_£ ;";) d r...,
c'"l
~':,-
~=
-? u"'; ;;J .L
1./·;
so ~ ~
-·
-~
,_;,
~
-:] q
(.J
"2.l ·""11
TABULATED AS OF: 04:35 PM
! (Q
✓
.2.
v
rt
€J
( id) ·0 ,:'-~
C,,
·C\
-J >,,) ~
9
Q 2/10/20044:35 PMTABULATION OF THE RESPONSES TO THE SP. ASS. HEARING ON SHERMAN
c.-;:p
.J;
Commission Meeting Date: January 27, 2004
Date: January 16, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Planning & Economic Development CfoC
RE: Rezoning request for property located at 407 Marquette Ave.
(SE comer of Marquette Ave. and Wood St.)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Request to rezone property located at 407 Marquette Ave., at the SE corner of
Marquette Ave. and Wood St., from R-1, Single-Family Residential to B-1, Limited
Business.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the request due to lack of compliance with the future land
use map and Master Land Use Plan.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission voted to deny the request at their 1/15 meeting.
Commissioners Spataro, Aslakson, Johnson and Sartorius voted for denial,
Commissioners Michalski and Smith voted against denial, and Commissioners Mazade
and Warmington abstained. T. Harryman was absent.
1/16/2004
ROLL CALL/ACTION SHEET
(9
PRESENT NAME ACTION A YES NAYS COMMENT
Commissioner Sheoherd ./
Commissioner Soataro M ✓
I. "
Mavor Warmington ✓ .- ....J.....
Commissioner Carter ./ ~ [' n
Commissioner Davis ✓ r -~
Commissioner Gawron C, ./ ~
I ./l.
Vice Mavor Larson ✓ 1'\""-
V
ROLL CALL/ACTION SHEET
PRESENT NAME ACTION AYES NAYS COMMENT
-p·
Commissioner Soataro /
Mavor Wannington ✓
Commissioner Catier ./ Q.,fl-,()/\ <Y.' n - • A A > .:
Commissioner Davis c., ✓ 'V (}
.(]
Commissioner Gawron ✓
" I'
Vice Mavor Larson Y\ ✓ . IJ·'
Commissioner Shenherd
CITY OF MUSKEGON
MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICIDGAN
ORDINANCE NO. _ _ __
An ordinance to amend the zoning map of the City to provide for a zone change for certain property
from R-1 "Single-Family Residential" to B-1 "Limited Business"
THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON HEREBY ORDAINS:
The zoning map of the City of Muskegon is hereby amended to change the zoning of the following
described prope1ty from R-1 "Single-Family" to B-1 "Limited Business":
CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903, LOTS 4 & 5 BLK 12
This ordinance adopted:
Ayes: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Nayes:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Adoption Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Effective Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
First Reading: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Second Reading: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Gail A. Kundinger, MMC, City Clerk
2/5/04
CERTIFICATE (Rezoning of 407 Marquette from R-1 to B-1)
The nndersigned, being the duly qualified clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County,
Michigan, does hereby ce1tify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of an ordinance adopted by the
City Commission of the City of Muskegon, at a regular meeting of the City Commission on the l 0th day of
February, 2004, at which meeting a quorum was present and remained throughout, aud that the original of
said ordinance is on file in the records of the City of Muskegon. I fmther ce1tify that the meeting was
conducted and public notice was given pursuant to and in full compliance with Act No. 267, Public Acts of
Michigan of 1976, as amended, and that minutes were kept and will be or have been made available as
required thereby.
DATED:------~ 2004.
Gail A. Kundinger, MMC
Clerk, City of Muskegon
Publish: Notice of Adoption to be published once within ten (10) days of final adoption.
2/5/04 2
CITY OF MUSKEGON
NOTICE OF ADOPTION
Please take notice that on Febrnary I 0, 2004, the City Commission of the City of Muskegon adopted
an ordinance amending the zoning map to provide for the change of zoning of the following property
from R-1 "Single-Family Residential" to B-1 "Limited Business":
CITY OF MUSKEGON REVISED PLAT OF 1903, LOTS 4 & 5 BLK 12
Copies of the ordinance may be viewed and purchased at reasonable cost at the Office of the City
Clerk in the City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, during regular business hours.
This ordinance amendment is effective ten days from the date of this publication.
Published _ _ _ _ _ _ _~2004 CITY OF MUSKEGON
By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Gail A. Kundinger, MMC
City Clerk
PUBLISH ONCE WITHIN TEN (1 OJ DAYS OF FINAL PASSAGE.
Account No. 101-80400-5354
2/5/04 3
~
::;: "
~
City of Muskegon
Planning Commission w-¢-,
Case # 2004-01
~
,
,,/os, I
/
!ti
/
H 111111 ('1 I I t.ULU
R•- 1 1111
1~ ~ ::.::.''.""""'
osc
~ ~ ,·r I PJ I 111111d
~'
n-7/l l
'~ ,': , , 11! 111
;;;,;r I A 1 ~1
I 1111
R·1
!/
600 O 600 1200 Feet
"'
Staff Report [EXCERPT)
CITY OF MUSKEGON
PLANNJNG COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETJNG
January 15, 2004
Hearing; Case 2004-1: Request to rezone the property located at 407 Marquette Ave. from R-1,
Single-Family Residential to B-1, Limited Business, by Ray Reasonover.
BACKGROUND
1. This request includes the property atthe southeast corner of Marquette Ave. and Wood St. The
property cmrnntly contains a small 'corner store' type of mini-mmt and additional vacant space.
There are two special use permits in place on this prope1ty- one for the mini-mmt and a second
for a youth recreational center which has never materialized.
2. The subject prope1ty is cmrently zoned R-1, Single-Family Residential. The Zoning Ordinance
was amended several yem·s ago to allow existing previously nonconforming commercial
structures in residential districts to be used for various low-scale commercial uses. This lm1guage
is how the special use permits on the subject prope1ty were approved. The intent of this language
is to allow some practical use for these buildings which would not likely be either renovated or
torn down for residential uses and would otherwise sit vacant. The language also allows smale
scale, low intensity uses, similar to those allowed in the B-1, Limited Business zoning district, in
or near neighborhoods. This helps to promote the idea of 'neighborhood businesses'.
3. When the language was included that allowed these commercial buildings to be used
commercially in residential zones, several conditions were also included. One of these conditions
is that ce1tain types of uses m·e prohibited under this language, "Prohibited uses: Activities
specifically prohibited include repair or service ofmotor vehicles and other large equipment; uses
serving or selling alcohol, manufacturing processes which would normally require industrial
zoning; any activity which may become a nuisance due to noise, unsightliness or odor; and any
activity which may adversely affect surrounding property."
4. When the Special Use Pennit was approved for the mini-mart in August of 2001, one of the
conditions of the pennit reinforced the prohibition against selling alcohol on the site. At the tinle,
the property owner stated that he had no intention of selling alcohol in the store. However, since
that time the prope1ty has changed hands and the store has a new owner/operator. The current
owner would like to sell alcohol in the store.
5. As the sale of alcohol is prohibited on this site both by the ordinance language allowing the
prope1ty to be re-used commercially and by the approved Special Use Pe1mit for this property, the
applicant is asking that the prope1ty be rezoned to a commercial designation. The prohibition
against alcohol sales does not appem· in the B-1 district language - it was added specifically to the
special use permit language for commercial buildings in residential districts. If the property were
to be rezoned to B-1 and the Special Use Permit were dissolved (since the use of the property as a
1/16/04 4
store would be allowed in the B-1 dish-ict by tight, the Special Use Permit would no longer be
necessaiy), then the applicant would be free to seek a liquor license in order to sell alcohol on the
property.
6. The City owns several vacant parcels of property directly adjacent to the subject property. This
comer is a somewhat busy one since Mai·quette Ave. and Wood St. each carry a heavier load of
traffic than a minor residential street. To the south of the subject property is an existing church.
Although this general area is entirely zoned for single-family residential, this particulai· block does
not contain any existing homes. However, given the recent level of increased interest in the
Jackson Hill neighborhood for single-fainily building projects, there is a good likelihood that the
City-owned parcels may be in demand in the near future for single-fainily residential pmposes.
7. The closest area to the subject property which is already currently zoned for commercial use is at
the corner of Marquette Ave. and Getty St., where there is some B-1 zoning. There is not much
commercial zoning existing within the Jackson Hill neighborhood. The subject property is located
at probably the busiest corner in this neighborhood. If any commercial zoning were to be located
in this neighborhood, the subject property would probably be the most practical spot for it.
However, the zoning ordinance does permit small scale commercial use on this property without it
needing to be rezoned, and the special use permit language is even more resh-ictive than the B-1
dish·ict, which helps to further protect the smTounding neighb01110od.
8. The Fuhn·e Land Use Map shows the subject property as "Single & Two-Fainily".
9. The Master Land Use Plan states:
• It is the goal of the Master Plan to maintain the residential integrity of the sub-area, while setting
aside small segments suitable for commercial and indush-ial uses in a highly compatible, non-
threatening, fashion.
• Single-fainily homes are found throughout the sub-ai·ea including many new homes located in the
Marquette neighborhood. They range from well to poorly maintained dwellings. Sub-Area 12 has
the highest concentration of homes experiencing significant site deterioration. A variety of schools
and churches are interspersed tlu·oughout and compliment the residential flavor of the area.
10. The Master Plan recommends for this sub-area:
• Clustered commercial development should be confined to the US-31 and Getty Street
intersections, consistent with similar development identified in Sub-Areas 3 and 4.
1/16/04 5
PHOTOS
/ ,
/ _/
/ /
/
ORDINANCE EXCERPTS
ARTICLE IV - RONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
PREAMBLE
These districts are designed to be composed of low density residential development. The regulations are intended to
stabilize, protect, and encourage the residential character of the district and prohibit activities not compatible with a
residential neighborhood. Development is limited to single family dwellings and such other uses as schools, parks,
churches, and ce1iain public facilities which serve residents of the district. ft is the intent of these districts to recognize that
the City of Muskegon has been developed and platted with some lots that are smaller than those found in recently urbanized
communities, and the standards in Section 2 100 reflect residential development standards that the citizens of Muskegon find
to be compatible.
SECTION 400: PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED
1/16/04 6
In R, One Family Residential, Districts no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, structurally
altered, or occupied except for one or more of the following specified uses, unless otherwise provided in this Ordinance;
1. One Family detached dwellings.
2. Home occupations of a non-indusn·ial nature may be pennitted. Permissible home occupations include,
but are not limited to the following: [amended 11/02]
2. Adult Foster Care Family Homes, provided that such facilities shall be at least one thousand five hundred
(1,500) feet from any other similar facility. [amended 11/02]
3. Accessory buildings and accessmy uses customarily incidental to any of the above Principal Uses
Permitted.
4. Uses similar to the above Principal Uses Permitted.
SECTION 401: SPECIAL LAND USES PERMTITED [amended2/02j
The following uses, and their accessory buildings and access01y uses, shall be permitted under the purview of Section 2332
after review and approval of the use (and a site plan, if required) by the Planning Commission, after Public Hearing, subject
to the applicable conditions, and any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Planning Commission:
I. Private recreational areas, and institutional recreational centers when not operated for profit, and
nonprofit swimming pool clubs, all subject to the following conditions: [amended 2/02]
2. Colleges, universities, and other such institutions of higher learning, public and private, offering courses
in general, technical, or religious education not operated for profit, all subject to the following conditions:
3. Churches and other facilities normally incidental thereto subject to the following conditions:
4. Elementary, intermediate, and/or secondary schools offering courses in general education, provided such
uses are set back thitty (30) feet from any lot in a residential zone.
5. Cemeteries.
6. Previously existing or established commercial uses not ah-early converted to a residential use may be
authorized under Special Use Penni! for the following [amended 12/99]:
7. Accessmy buildings and accessory uses customarily incidental to any of the above Special Land Uses
Permitted.
8. Uses similar to the above Special Land Uses Permitted.
1/16/04 7
SECTION 402: [RESERVED] [amended8/01]
SECTION 403: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OPTION [amended 12/97]
SECTION 404: AREA AND BULK REQUIREMENTS [amended 4/00]
ARTICLE X- B-1 LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICTS
PREAMBLE
The B-1 Limited Business Districts are designed primarily for the convenience of persons residing in adjacent residential
areas or neighborhoods, and to pennit only such uses as are necessary to satisfy those limited basic, daily shopping and/or
service needs, which by their ve1y nature are not similar to the shopping patterns of the B-2 convenience and Comparison,
B-3 Central Business Diso·ict, and B-4 General Business Districts. B-1 Districts are also intended to be utilized at planned
locations in the City as zones of transition between major thoroughfares and residential areas, and between intensive
nonresidential areas and residential areas. In the B-1 District all business establishments shall be retail and/or service
establishments dealing directly with consumers. All goods produced on the premises shall be sold at retail on tlie premises
where produced. All business, servicing or processing, except off-street parking or loading, shall be conducted witl1in a
completely enclosed building, or in an area specifically approved by the City.
SECTION 1000: PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED
In a B-1 Limited Business District no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, shucturally altered, or
occupied except for one (1) or more of the following specified uses, unless othe1wise provided for in this Ordinance:
I. Any generally recognized retail business which supplies new conunodities on the premises for persons residing in
adjacent residential areas such as: groceries, meats, daily products, baked goods or other foods, drugs, drygoods,
and notions or hardware. No individual uses, either freestanding or in a group of uses, shall exceed two thousand
five hundred (2,500) square feet in area.
2. Any personal service establishment which pe1fonns services on the premises for persons residing in adjacent
residential areas, such as: Shoe repair, d1y cleaning shops, tailor shops, beauty parlors, barber shops, dressmaker,
tailor, phannacist, or an establishment doing radio, television, or home appliance repair, and similar establishments
that require a retail character no more objectionable than the aforementioned, subject to the provision that no more
than five (5) persons shall be employed at any time in the sale, repair, or other processing of goods.
3. Professional offices of doctors, lawyers, dentists, chiropractors, osteopaths, architects, engineers, accountants, and
similar or allied professions. No individual use shall exceed two tliousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in area.
4. Office buildings for any of tl1e following types of occupations: executive, administrative and professional. No
individual use shall exceed two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in area.
5. Residential uses as pmt of a building in tliis zone shall be allowed upon issuance of a Ce1tificate of Occupancy
from the Department of inspections, provided that the minimum lot area requirements of the RM-1 Diso·ict are
met.
6. Accessory buildings and accessmy uses customarily incidental to any of the above Principal Uses Permitted.
7. Uses similar to the above Principal Uses Pennitted.
1/16104 8
SECTION I 00 I: SPECIAL LAND USES PERMITTED
The following area, and their accessory buildings and accessory uses, shall be permitted under the purview of Section 2332
after review and approval of the use ( and a site plan, if required) by the Planning Commission, after Public Hearing, subject
to the applicable conditions and any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Planning Commission. A site plan shall
not be required when there are no external changes made to the buildings or propetties.
1. Restaurants, or other places serving food, except drive-in or drive-through restaurants.
2. Churches and other facilities normally incidental thereto subject to tl1e following conditions:
3. Accessoty buildings and accessoty uses customarily incidental to the above Special Land Uses Permitted.
4. Uses similar to the above Special Land Uses Permitted.
SECTION 1002: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
SECTION 1003: AREAANDBULKREQUIREMENTS [amended4/00)
RECOMMENDATION
B-1 is intended as a 'neighborhood' commercial zoning designation, and only allows small scale, low
intensity commercial uses. The square footage of most permitted uses in the B-1 district is limited to
2,500 square feet. If the Planning and City Commissions were inclined to approve a rezoning for this
property to a commercial designation, staff would feel most comf011able with the B-1 district there.
However, since the existing ordinance language and special use permit do allow small scale
commercial uses (including the c1ment use) at this site without a rezoning, staff would recommend
denial of this request.
DELIBERATION
Criteria-based questions typically asked during a rezoning include:
I. What, if any, identifiable conditions related to the petition have changed which justify the
petitioned change in zoning.
2. What are the precedents and the possible effects of precedent which might result from the
approval or denial of the petition.
3. What is the impact of the amendment on the ability of the city to provide adequate public
services and facilities and/or programs that might reasonably be required in the future if the
petition is approved.
1/16/04 9
4. Does the petitioned zoning change adversely affect the environmental conditions or value of the
surrounding property.
5. Does the petitioned zoning change generally comply with the adopted Fnture Land Use Plan of
the City.
6. Are there any significant negative environmental impacts which would reasonably occur if the
petitioned zoning change and resulting allowed structures were built such as:
a. Surface water drainage problems
b. Waste water disposal problems
c. Adverse effect on suiface or subsuiface water quality
d. The loss of valuable natural resources such as forest, wetland, historic
sites, or wildlife areas.
1/16/04 10
Date: February 1 o, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: City- MOOT Agreement for:
Sherman Blvd. Lincoln to Beach
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To approve the attached contract with MOOT for the reconstruction of Sherman Blvd.
from Lincoln to Beach Street and to approve the attached resolution authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
MDOT's participation is estimated at $355,830 but not to exceed 81.85% of eligible
cost. The estimated total cost of the project, including the none participating items of
engineering and watermain, is $550,000.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None at this time. The City's share of the cost will come out of the Major Street
and water funds as was budgeted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the attached agreement and resolution be approved.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
RESOLUTION 2004-20 (a)
RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF MUSKEGON FOR THE
RECONSTRUCTION OF SHERMAN BLVD. FROM LINCOLN STREET TO BEACH STREET ALONG
WITH SOME WATER MAIN WORK TOGETHER WITH THE NECESSARY RELATED WORK AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR STEPHEN J. WARMINGTON AND CITY CLERK GAIL A
KUNDINGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT
Moved by Vice Mayor Larson and supported by
Commissioner_G_a_w_r_o_n_ _ _ _ _ _ _ that the following Resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, entry by the City of Muskegon into Contract no. 04-5014 between the Michigan
Department of Transportation and the City of Muskegon for the reconstruction of Sherman Blvd
from Lincoln to Beach St. within the City is in the best interests of the City of Muskegon.
RESOLVED, that entry by the City into Contract Agreement Number 04-5014 be and the same is
hereby authorized and approved and the Mayor and Clerk are authorized to execute said contract for
and on behalf of the City of Muskegon.
Adopted this 1 0th day of February , 2004.
BY
ATTEST
Gail A Kundinger, City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on
February 10 , 2004. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open
Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
STATE OF MICHIGAN
JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GLORIA J. JEFF
GOVERNOR DIRECTOR
LANSING
January 30, 20044
Ms. Gail Kundinger
Clerk
City of Muskegon
933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536 RECEIVED
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Muskegon,MI 49443-0536
FEB 04 200\
Dear Ms. Kundinger:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RE: MDOT Contract No.: 04-5014
Control Section: STUL 6 I 407
Job Number: 56377
Enclosed is the original and one copy of the above described contract between your organization
and the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). Please take time to read and
understand this contract. If this contract meets with your approval, please complete the
following checklist:
PLEASE DO NOT DATE THE CONTRACTS. MDOTwill date the contracts when they
are executed. A contract is not executed unless it has been signed by both parties.
_ Secure the necessary signatures on all contracts.
Include a certified resolution. The resolution should specifically name the officials who are
authorized to sign the contracts.
_ Return all copies of the contracts to my attention of the Department's Design Division,
2 nd floor for MOOT execution.
A copy of the executed contract will be forwarded to you. If you have any questions, please feel
free to contact me at (517) 335-2264.
Sincerely,
<--~'Li..v ~Vt.bl__,/
Jackie Burch
Contract Processing Specialist
Design Support Area
Enclosure
MURRAY D. VAN WAGONER BUILDING• P,O. BOX 30050 · LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909
www.michigan.gov • {517) 373-2090
LH-LAN-0 (01/03)
STATE OF MICHIGAN
JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GLORIA J. JEFF
GOVERNOR DIRECTOR
LANSING
March 1, 20044
Ms. Gail Kundinger
Clerk
City of Muskegon
933 Terrace Street
P.O. Box 536
Muskegon,MI 49443-0536
Dear Ms. Kundinger:
RB: MDOT Contract Number: 04-5014
Control Section: STUL 61407
Job Number: 56377
Enclosed is a fully executed copy of the above noted agreement.
Sincerely,
~~ fS,u,1,.dl-
Jackie Burch
Contract Processing Specialist
Design Support Area
Enclosure
Cc: M. Harbison, Design Support Area
Project Accounting, Financial Operations Division
Grand Region Engineer
MURRAY D. VAN WAGONER BUILDING• P.O. BOX 30050 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909
www.michigan.gov • (517) 373-2090
LH-LAN-0 (01/03)
~--~~c;--;;=-··
STP
RECEIVED
CITY OF MUSKEGON DIR
Control Section STUL 61407
FEB 2 0 2001t Job Number 56377
Project STP 0461 (308)
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Federal Item No. HH3843
CFDANo. 20.205
Contract No. 04-5014
PART I
THIS CONTRACT, consisting of PART I and PART II (Standard Agreement
Provisions), is made and entered into this date of FEB ~- 7 2004 by and between
the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter referred to as the
"DEPARTMENT"; and the CITY OF MUSKEGON, a Michigan municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as the "REQUESTING PARTY"; for the purpose of fixing the rights and
obligations of the parties in agreeing to the following improvements, in the City of Muskegon,
Michigan, hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT" and estimated in detail on EXHIBIT "I",
dated January 16, 2004, attached hereto and made a part hereof:
PART A-FEDERAL PARTICIPATION
Hot mix asphalt paving work along Sherman Boulevard from Lincoln Street to Beach
Street; including pavement removal, grading, drainage structure adjustment, and
permanent pavement marking work; and all together with necessary related work.
PART B - NO FEDERAL PARTICIPATION
Watermain work along Sherman Boulevard from Lincoln Street to Beach Street; and all
together with necessary related work.
WITNESS ETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal law, monies have been provided for the performance of
certain improvements on public roads; and
WHEREAS, the reference "FHWA" in PART I and PART II refers to the United States
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; and
WHEREAS, the PROJECT, or portions of the PROJECT, at the request of the
REQUESTING PARTY, are being progranuned with the FHWA, for implementation with the
use of Federal Funds under the following Federal program(s) or funding:
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 I
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have reached an understanding with each other regarding
the performance of the PROJECT work and desire to set forth this understanding in the form of a
written contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual undertakings of
the parties and in conformity with applicable law, it is agreed:
1. The parties hereto shall undertake and complete the PROJECT in accordance with
the terms of this contract.
2. The term "PROJECT COST", as herein used, is hereby defined as the cost of the
physical construction necessary for the completion of the PROJECT.
Costs for construction engineering and inspection incurred by the DEPARTMENT will
be charged 100 percent to the REQUESTING PARTY. Any other costs incurred by the
DEPARTMENT as a result of this contract will be at PROJECT COST.
The costs incurred by the REQUESTING PARTY for preliminary engineering,
construction engineering and inspection, and right-of-way are excluded from the PROJECT
COST as defined by this contract.
3. The DEPARTMENT is authorized by the REQUESTING PARTY to administer
on behalf of the REQUESTING PARTY all phases of the PROJECT including advertising and
awarding the construction contract for the PROJECT or portions of the PROJECT. Such
administration shall be in accordance with PART II, Section II of this contract.
Any items of the PROJECT COST incurred by the DEPARTMENT may be charged to
the PROJECT.
4. The REQUESTING PARTY, at no cost to the PROJECT or to the
DEPARTMENT, shall:
A. Design or cause to be designed the plans for the PROJECT.
B. Appoint a project engineer who shall be in responsible charge of the
PROJECT and ensure that the plans and specifications are followed.
C. Perform or cause to be performed the construction engineering and
inspection services necessary for the completion of the PROJECT.
The REQUESTING PARTY will furnish the DEPARTMENT proposed timing
sequences for trunkline signals that, if any, are being made part of the improvement. No timing
adjustments shall be made by the REQUESTING PARTY at any trunkline intersection, without
prior issuances by the DEPARTMENT of Standard Traffic Signal Timing Permits.
09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 2
5. The PROJECT COST shall be met in accordance with the following:
PART A
Federal Surface Transportation Funds shall be applied to the eligible items of the
PART A portion of the PROJECT COST at the established Federal participation
ratio equal to 81.85 percent up to an amount not to exceed $355,830. The balance
of the PART A portion of the PROJECT COST, after deduction of Federal Funds,
shall be charged to and paid by the REQUESTING PARTY in the manner and at
the times hereinafter set forth.
PARTB
The PART B portion of the PROJECT COST is not eligible for Federal
participation and shall be charged to and paid 100 percent by the REQUESTING
PARTY in the manner and at the times hereinafter set forth.
Any items of PROJECT COST not reimbursed by Federal Funds will be the sole
responsibility of the REQUESTING PARTY.
6. No working capital deposit will be required for this PROJECT.
In order to fulfill the obligations assumed by the REQUESTING PARTY under the
provisions of this contract, the REQUESTING PARTY shall make prompt payments of its share
of the PROJECT COST upon receipt of progress billings from the DEPARTMENT as herein
provided. All payments will be made within 30 days of receipt of billings from the
DEPARTMENT. Billings to the REQUESTING PARTY will be based upon the REQUESTING
PARTY'S share of the actual costs incurred less Federal Funds earned as the PROJECT
progresses.
In the event of any discrepancies between PART I and PART II of this contract, the
provisions of PART I shall prevail.
7. Upon completion of construction of the PROJECT, the REQUESTING PARTY
will promptly cause to be enacted and enforced such ordinances or regulations as may be
necessary to prohibit parking in the roadway right-of-way throughout the limits of the
PROJECT.
8. The performance of the entire PROJECT under this contract, whether Federally
funded or not, will be subject to the provisions and requirements of PART II that are applicable
to a Federally funded project.
09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/20/04 3
9. The REQUESTING PARTY certifies that a) it is a person under 1995 PA 71 and
is not aware of and has no reason to believe that the property is a facility as defined in MSA
13A.20101(1)(1); b) the REQUESTING PARTY further certifies that it has completed the tasks
required by MCL 324.20126 (3)(h); MSA 13A.20126(3)(h); c) it conducted a visual inspection
of property within the existing right of way on which construction is to be performed to
determine if any hazardous substances were present; and at sites on which historically were
located businesses that involved hazardous substances, it performed a reasonable investigation to
determine whether hazardous substances exist. This reasonable investigation should include, at a
minimum, contact with local, state and federal environmental agencies to determine if the site
has been identified as, or potentially as, a site containing hazardous substances; d) it did not
cause or contribute to the release or threat of release of any hazardous substance found within the
PROJECT limits.
The REQUESTING PARTY also certifies that, in addition to reporting the presence of
any hazardous substances to the Department of Environmental Quality, it has advised the
DEPARTMENT of the presence of any and all hazardous substances which the REQUESTING
PARTY found within the PROJECT limits, as a result of performing the investigation and visual
inspection required herein. The REQUESTING PARTY also certifies that it has been unable to
identify any entity who may be liable for the cost of remediation. As a result, the
REQUESTING PARTY has included all estimated costs of remediation of such hazardous
substances in its estimated cost of construction of the PROJECT.
10. If, subsequent to execution of this contract, previously unknown hazardous
substances are discovered within the PROJECT limits, which require environmental remediation
pursuant to either state or federal law, the REQUESTING PARTY, in addition to reporting that
fact to the Department of Environmental Quality, shall immediately notify the DEPARTMENT,
both orally and in writing of such discovery. The DEPARTMENT shall consult with the
REQUESTING PARTY to determine ifit is willing to pay for the cost of remediation and, with
the FHWA, to determine the eligibility, for reimbursement, of the remediation costs. The
REQUESTING PARTY shall be charged for and shall pay all costs associated with such
remediation, including all delay costs of the contractor for the PROJECT, in the event that
remediation and delay costs are not deemed eligible by the FHWA. If the REQUESTING
PARTY refuses to participate in the cost of remediation, the DEPARTMENT shall terminate the
PROJECT. The parties agree that any costs or damages that the DEPARTMENT incurs as a
result of such termination shall be considered a PROJECT COST.
11. If federal and/or state funds administered by the DEPARTMENT are used to pay
the cost of remediating any hazardous substances discovered after the execution of this contract
and if there is a reasonable likelihood of recovery, the REQUESTING PARTY, in cooperation
with the Department of Environmental Quality and the DEPARTMENT, shall make a diligent
effort to recover such costs from all other possible entities. If recovery is made, the
DEPARTMENT shall be reimbursed from such recovery for the proportionate share of the
amount paid by the FHWA and/or the DEPARTMENT and the DEPARTMENT shall credit
such sums to the appropriate funding source.
09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 4
12. The DEPARTMENT'S sole reason for entering into this contract is to enable the
REQUESTING PARTY to obtain and use funds provided by the Federal Highway
Administration pursuant to Title 23 of the United States Code.
Any and all approvals of, reviews of, and recommendations regarding contracts,
agreements, permits, plans, specifications, or documents, of any nature, or any inspections of
work by the DEPARTMENT or its agents pursuant to the terms of this contract are done to assist
the REQUESTING PARTY in meeting program guidelines in order to qualify for available
funds. Such approvals, reviews, inspections and recommendations by the DEPARTMENT or its
agents shall not relieve the REQUESTING PARTY and the local agencies, as applicable, of their
ultimate control and shall not be construed as a warranty of their propriety or that the
DEPARTMENT or its agents is assuming any liability, control or jurisdiction.
The providing of recommendations or advice by the DEPARTMENT or its agents does
not relieve the REQUESTING PARTY and the local agencies, as applicable of their exclusive
jurisdiction of the highway and responsibility under MCL 691.1402, MSA 3.996(102).
When providing approvals, reviews and recommendations under this contract, the
DEPARTMENT or its agents is performing a governmental function, as that term is defined in
MCL 691.1401; MSA 3.996(101), which is incidental to the completion of the PROJECT.
13. The DEPARTMENT, by executing this contract, and rendering services pursuant
to this contract, has not and does not assume jurisdiction of the highway, described as the
PROJECT for purposes of MCL 691.1402; MSA 3.996(102). Exclusive jurisdiction of such
highway for the purposes of MCL 691.1402; MSA 3.996(102) rests with the REQUESTING
PARTY and other local agencies having respective jurisdiction.
14. The REQUESTING PARTY shall approve all of the plans and specifications to
be used on the PROJECT and shall be deemed to have approved all changes to the plans and
specifications when put into effect. It is agreed that ultimate responsibility and control over the
PROJECT rests with the REQUESTING PARTY and local agencies, as applicable.
15. The REQUESTING PARTY agrees that the costs reported to the DEPARTMENT
for this contract will represent only those items that are properly chargeable in accordance with
this contract. The REQUESTING PARTY also certifies that it has read the contract terms and
has made itself aware of the applicable laws, regulations, and terms of this contract that apply to
the reporting of costs incurred under the terms of this contract.
16. The parties shall promptly provide comprehensive assistance and cooperation in
defending and resolving any claims brought against the DEPARTMENT by the contractor,
vendors or suppliers as a result of the DEPARTMENT'S award of the construction contract for
the PROJECT. Costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT in defending or resolving such claims
shall be considered PROJECT COSTS.
09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 5
17. The DEPARTMENT shall require the contractor who is awarded the contract for
the construction of the PROJECT to provide insurance in the amounts specified and in
accordance with the DEPARTMENT'S current Standard Specifications for Construction and to:
A. Maintain bodily injury and property damage insurance for the duration of
the PROJECT.
B. Provide owner's protective liability insurance naming as insureds the State
of Michigan, the Michigan State Transportation Commission, the
DEPARTMENT and its officials, agents and employees, the
REQUESTING PARTY and any other county, county road commission,
or municipality in whose jurisdiction the PROJECT is located, and their
employees, for the duration of the PROJECT and to provide, upon request,
copies of certificates of insurance to the insureds. It is understood that the
DEPARTMENT does not assume jurisdiction of the highway described as
the PROJECT as a result of being named as an insured on the owner's
protective liability insurance policy.
C. Comply with the requirements of notice of cancellation and reduction of
insurance set forth in the current standard specifications for construction
and to provide, upon request, copies of notices and reports prepared to
those insured.
09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 6
18. This contract shall become binding on the parties hereto and of full force and
effect upon the signing thereof by the duly authorized officials for the parties hereto and upon the
adoption of the necessary resolutions approving said contract and authorizing the signatures
thereto of the respective officials of the REQUESTING PARTY, a certified copy of which
resolution shall be attached to this contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF MUSKEGON MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSP RTATION
By J.vv..
Title: Gail A. Kundinger, Ci Clerlc
09/06/90 STP.FOR 1/16/04 7
January 16, 2004
EXHIBIT I
CONTROL SECTION STUL61407
JOB NUMBER 56377
PROJECT SIP 0461 (308)
ESTIMATED COST
CONTRACTED WORK
PART A PARTB TOTAL
Estimated Cost $435,900 $37,100 $473,000
COST PARTICIPATION
GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $435,900 $37,100 $473,000
Less Federal Funds* $355,830 $ -0- $355,830
BALANCE (REQUESTING PARTIES SHARE) $ 80,070 $37,100 $117,170
*Federal Funds shall be applied to the eligible items of the PART A portion of the PROJECT
COST at a participation ratio equal to 81.85 percent up to an amount not to exceed $355,830.
NO DEPOSIT
09/06/90 SIP.FOR 1/20/04 8
•,
DOT TYPEB
BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS
03-15-93
PART II
STANDARD AGREEMENT PROVISIONS
SECTION I COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS AND DIRECTIVES.
SECTION II PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION .
SECTION III ACCOUNTING AND BILLING
SECTION IV MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION
SECTION V SPECIAL PROGRAM AND PROJECT CONDITIONS
I
SECTION!
COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS AND DIRECTIVES
A. To qualify for eligible cost, all work shall be documented in accordance with the require-
ments and procedures of the DEPARTMENT.
B. All work on projects for which reimbursement with Federal funds is requested shall be
performed in accordance with the requirements and guidelines set forth in the following
Directives of the Federal-Aid Policy Guide (FAPG) of the FHWA, as applicable, and as
referenced in pertinent sections of Title 23 and Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), and all supplements and amendments thereto.
1. Engineering
a. FAPG (6012.1): Preliminary Engineering
b. F APG (23 CFR 172): Administration of Engineering and Design Related
Service Contracts
c. FAPG (23 CFR 635A): Contract Procedures
d. F APG (49 CFR 18.22): Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments-Allowable Costs
2. Construction
a. FAPG (23 CFR 140E): Administrative Settlement Costs-Contract Claims
b. FAPG (23 CFR 140B): Construction Engineering Costs
C. FAPG (23 CFR 17): Recordkeeping and Retention Requirements for Federal-
Aid Highway Records of State Highway Agencies
d. FAPG (23 CFR 635A): Contract Procedures
e. FAPG (23 CFR 635B): Force Account Construction
f. F APG (23 CFR 645A): Utility Relocations, Adjustments and Reimbursement
g. FAPG (23 CFR 645B): Accommodation of Utilities (PPM 30-4.1)
03-15-93 2
h. FAPG (23 CFR 655F): Traffic Control Devices on Federal-Aid and other
Streets and Highways
1. F APG (49 CFR 18.22):Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments-Allowable Costs
3. Modification Or Construction Of Railroad Facilities
a. FAPG (23 CFR 1401): Reimbursement for Railroad Work
b. F APG (23 CFR 646B): Railroad Highway Projects
C. In conformance with FAPG (23 CFR 630C) Project Agreements, the political subdivisions
party to this contract, on those Federally funded projects which exceed a total cost of
$100,000.00 stipulate the following with respect to their specific jurisdictions:
I. That any facility to be utilized in performance under or to benefit from this contract
is not listed on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) List of Violating
Facilities issued pursuant to the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act, as
amended, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended.
2. That they each agree to comply with all of the requirements of Section 114 of the
Federal Clean Air Act and Section 308 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
and all regulations and guidelines issued thereunder.
3. That as a condition of Federal aid pursuant to this contract they shall notify the
DEPARTMENT of the receipt of any advice indicating that a facility to be utilized
in performance under or to benefit from this contract is under consideration to be
listed on the EPA List of Violating Facilities.
D. Ensure that the PROJECT is constructed in accordance with and incorporates all committed
environmental impact mitigation measures listed in approved environmental documents
unless modified or deleted by approval of the FHWA.
E. All the requirements, guidelines, conditions and restrictions noted in all other pertinent
Directives and Instructional Memoranda of the FHWA will apply to this contract and will
be adhered to, as applicable, by the parties hereto.
03-15-93 3
SECTION II
PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION
A. The DEPARTMENT shall provide such administrative guidance as it determines is required
by the PROJECT in order to facilitate the obtaining of available federal and/or state funds.
B. The DEP ARTMENTwill advertise and award all contracted portions ofthe PROJECT work.
Prior to advertising of the PROJECT for receipt of bids, the REQUESTING PARTY may
delete any portion or all of the PROJECT work. After receipt of bids for the PROJECT, the
REQUESTING PARTY shall have the right to reject the amount bid for the PROJECT prior
to the award of the contract for the PROJECT only if such amount exceeds by twenty percent
(20%) the final engineer's estimate therefor. If such rejection of the bids is not received in
writing within two (2) weeks after letting, the DEPARTMENT will assume concurrence.
The DEPARTMENT may, upon request, readvertise the PROJECT. Should the REQUEST-
ING PARTY so request in writing within the aforesaid two (2) week period after letting, the
PROJECT will be cancelled and the DEPARTMENT will refund the unused balance of the
deposit less all costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT.
C. The DEPARTMENT will perform such inspection services on PROJECT work performed
by the REQUESTING PARTY with its own forces as is required to ensure compliance with
the approved plans & specifications.
D. On those projects funded with Federal monies, the DEPARTMENT shall as may be required
secure from the FHWA approval of plans and specifications, and such cost estimates for
FHWA participation in the PROJECT COST.
E. All work in connection with the PROJECT shall be performed in conformance with the
Michigan Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction, and the
supplemental specifications, Special Provisions and plans pertaining to the PROJECT and
all materials furnished and used in the construction of the PROJECT shall conform to the
aforesaid specifications. No extra work shall be performed nor changes in plans and
specifications made until said work or changes are approved by the project engineer and
authorized by the DEPARTMENT.
03-15-93 4
F. Should it be necessary or desirable that portions of the work covered by this contract be
accomplished by a consulting firm, a railway company, or governmental ~~ency, firm,
person, or corporation, under a subcontract with the REQUESTING PARTY atY'OJECT
expense, such subcontracted arrangements will be covered by formal written agi<':c'll.ent
between the REQUESTING PARTY and that party. ~
This formal written agreement shall: include a reference to the specific prime contract to
which it pertains; include provisions which clearly set forth the maximum reimbursable and
the basis of payment; provide for the maintenance of accounting records in accordance wifa
generally accepted accounting principles, which clearly document the actual cost of the
services provided; provide that costs eligible for reimbursement shall be in accordance with
clearly defined cost criteria such as 49 CFR Part 18, 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 140, 0MB
Circular A-87, etc. as applicable; provide for access to the department or its representatives
to inspect and audit all data and records related to the agreement for a minimum of three
years after the department's final payment to the local unit.
All such agreements will be submitted for approval by the DEPARTMENT and, if
applicable, by the FHWA prior to execution thereof, except for agreements for amounts less
than $25,000 for preliminary engineering and testing services executed under and in accor-
dance with the provisions of the "Small Purchase Procedures" FAPG (23 CFR 172), which
do not require prior approval of the DEPARTMENI' or the FHWA.
Any such approval by the DEPARTMENT shall in no way be construed as a warranty of the
subcontractor's qualifications, financial integrity, or ability to perform the work being
subcontracted.
G. The REQUESTING PARTY, at no costto the PROJECT or the DEPARTMENT, shall make
such arrangements with railway companies, utilities, etc., as may be necessary for the
performance of work required for the PROJECT but for which Federal or other
reimbursement will not be requested.
H. The REQUESTING PARTY, at no cost to the PROJECT, or the DEPARTMENT, shall
secure, as necessary, all agreements and approvals of the PROJECT with railway companies,
the Railroad Safety & Tariffs Division of the DEPARTMENT and other concerned
governmental agencies other than the FHWA, and will forward same to the DEPARTMENT
for such reviews and approvals as may be required.
I. No PROJECT work for which reimbursement will be requested by the REQUESTING
PARTY is to be subcontracted or performed until the DEPARTMENT gives written
notification that such work may commence.
03-15-93 5
J. The REQUESTING PARTY shall be responsible for the payment of all costs and expenses
incurred in the performance of the work it agrees to undertake and perform.
K. The REQUESTING PARTY shall pay directly to the party performing the work all billings
for the services performed on the PROJECT which are authorized by or through the
REQUESTING PARTY.
L. The REQUESTING PARTY shall submit to the DEPARTMENT all paid billings for which
reimbursement is desired in accordance with DEPARTMENT procedures.
M. All work by a consulting firm will be performed in compliance with the applicable
provisions of 1980 PA 299, Subsection 2001, MCL 339.2001; MSA 18.425(2001), as well
as in accordance with the provisions of all previously cited Directives of the FHW A.
N. The project engineer shall be subject to such administrative guidance as may be deemed
necessary to ensure compliance with program requirement and, in those instances where a
consultant firm is retained to provide engineering and inspection services, the personnel
performing those services shall be subject to the same conditions.
0. The DEPARTMENT, in administering the PROJECT in accordance with applicable Federal
and State requirements and regulations, neither assumes nor becomes liable for any obliga-
tions undertaken or arising between the REQUESTING PARTY and any other party with
respect to the PROJECT.
P. In the event it is determined by the DEPARTMENT that there will be either insufficient
Federal funds or insufficient time to properly administer such funds for the entire PROJECT
or portions thereof, the DEPARTMENT, prior to advertising or issuing authorization for
work performance, may cancel the PROJECT, or any portion thereof, and upon written
notice to the parties this contract shall be void and of no effect with respect to that cancelled
portion of the PROJECT. Any PROJECT deposits previously made by the parties on the
cancelled portions of the PROJECT will be promptly refunded.
Q. Those projects funded with Federal monies will be subject to inspection at all times by the
DEPARTMENT and the FHWA.
03-15-93 6
SECTION III
ACCOUNTING AND BILLING
A. Procedures for billing for work undertaken by the REQUESTING PARTY:
I. The REQUESTING PARTY shall establish and maintain accurate records, in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, of all expenses incurred
for which payment is sought or made under this contract, said records to be
hereinafter referred to as the "RECORDS". Separate accounts shall be established
and maintained for all costs incurred under this contract.
The REQUESTING PARTY shall maintain the RECORDS for at least three (3) years
from the date of final payment of Federal Aid made by the DEPARTMENT under
this contract. In the event of a dispute with regard to the allowable expenses or any
other issue under this contract, the REQUESTING PARTY shall thereafter continue
to maintain the RECORDS at least until that dispute has been finally decided and the
time for all available challenges or appeals of that decision has expired.
The DEPARTMENT, or its representative, may inspect, copy, or audit the
RECORDS at any reasonable time after giving reasonable notice.
If any part of the work is subcontracted, the REQUESTING PARTY shall assure
compliance with the above for all subcontracted work.
In the event that an audit performed by or on behalf of the DEPARTMENT indicates
an adjustment to the costs reported under this contract, or questions the allowability
of an item of expense, the DEPARTMENT shall promptly submit to the
REQUESTING PARTY, a Notice of Audit Results and a copy of the audit report
which may supplement or modify any tentative findings verbally communicated to
the REQUESTING PARTY at the completion ofan audit.
Within sixty (60) days after the date of the Notice of Audit Results, the
REQUESTING PARTY shall: (a) respond in writing to the responsible Bureau or the
DEPARTMENT indicating whether or not it concurs with the audit report, (b) clearly
explain the nature and basis for any disagreement as to a disallowed item of expense
and, (c) submit to the DEPARTMENT a written explanation as to any questioned or
no opinion expressed item of expense, hereinafter referred to as the "RESPONSE".
The RESPONSE shall be clearly stated and provide any supporting documentation
necessary to resolve any disagreement or questioned or no opinion expressed item of
expense. Where the documentation is voluminous, the REQUESTING PARTY may
supply appropriate excerpts and make alternate arrangements to conveniently and
03-15-93 7
reasonably make that documentation available for review by the DEPARTMENT.
The RESPONSE shall refer to and apply the language of the contract. The
REQUESTING PARTY agrees that failure to submit a RESPONSE within the sixty
(60) day period constitutes agreement with any disallowance of an item of expense
and authorizes the DEPARTMENT to finally disallow any items of questioned or no
opinion expressed cost.
The DEPARTMENT shall make its decision with regard to any Notice of Audit
Results and RESPONSE within one hundred twenty (120) days after the date of the
Notice of Audit Results. Ifthe DEPARTMENT determines that an overpayment has
been made to the REQUESTING PARTY, the REQUESTING PARTY shall repay
that amount to the DEPARTMENT or reach agreement with the DEPARTMENT on
a repayment schedule within thirty (30) days after the date of an invoice from the
DEPARTMENT. If the REQUESTING PARTY fails to repay the overpayment or
reach agreement with the DEPARTMENT on a repayment schedule within the thirty
(30) day period, the REQUESTING PARTY agrees that the DEPARTMENT shall
deduct all or a portion of the overpayment from any funds then or thereafter payable
by the DEPARTMENT to the REQUESTING PARTY under this contract or any
other agreement, or payable to the REQUESTING PARTY under the terms of 1951
PA 51, as applicable. Interest will be assessed on any partial payments or repayment
schedules based on the unpaid balance at the end of each month until the balance is
paid in full. The assessment of interest will begin thirty (30) days from the date of
the invoice. The rate of interest will be based on the Michigan Department of
Treasury common cash funds interest earnings. The rate of interest will be reviewed
annually by the DEPARTMENT and adjusted as necessary based on the Michigan
Department of Treasury common cash funds interest earnings. The REQUESTING
PARTY expressly consents to this withholding or offsetting of funds under those
circumstances, reserving the right to file a lawsuit in the Court of Claims to contest
the DEPARTMENT'S decision only as to any item of expense the disallowance of
which was disputed by the REQUESTING PARTY in a timely filed RESPONSE.
The REQUESTING PARTY shall comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L.
98-502.
The REQUESTING PARTY shall adhere to the following requirements associated
with audits of accounts and records:
a. Agencies expending a total of $300,000 or more in federal funds, from one or
more funding sources in its fiscal year, shall comply with the requirements of the
federal Office of Management and Budget (0MB) Circular A-133, as revised or
amended.
03-15-93 8
The agency shall submit two copies of:
The Reporting Package
The Data Collection Form
The management letter to the agency, if one issued by the audit firm
The 0MB Circular A-133 audit must be submitted to the address below in
accordance with the time frame established in the circular, as revised or amended.
b. Agencies expending less than $300,000 in federal funds must submit a letter to
the Department advising that a circular audit was not required. The letter shall
indicate the applicable fiscal year, the amount of federal funds spent, the name(s) of
the Department federal programs, and the CFDA grant number(s). This information
must also be submitted to the address below.
c. Address: Michigan Department of Transportation
Bureau of Highways Technical Services
425 W. Ottawa, P.O. Box 30050
Lansing, MI 48909
d. Agencies must also comply with applicable State laws and regulations relative to
audit requirements.
e. Agencies shall not charge audit costs to Department's federal programs which are
not in accordance with the 0MB Circular A-133 requirements.
f. All agencies are subject to the federally required monitoring activities, which may
include limited scope reviews and other on-site monitoring.
2. Agreed Unit Prices Work - All billings for work undertaken by the REQUESTING
PARTY on an agreed unit price basis will be submitted in accordance with the
Michigan Department ofTransportation Standard Specifications for Construction and
pertinent FAPO Directives and Guidelines of the FHW A.
3. Force Account Work and Subcontracted Work - All billings submitted to the
DEPARTMENT for Federal reimbursement for items of work performed on a force
account basis or by any subcontract with a consulting firm, railway company,
governmental agency or other party, under the terms of this contract, shall be
prepared in accordance with the provisions of the pertinent FHPM Directives and the
procedures of the DEPARTMENT. Progress billings may be submitted monthly
during the time work is being performed provided, however, that no bill of a lesser
amount than $1,000.00 shall be submitted unless it is a final or end of fiscal year
billing. All billings shall be labeled either "Progress Bill Number _ _ _ ", or
"Final Billing".
03-15-93 9
4. Final billing under this contract shall be submitted in a timely manner but not later
than six months after completion of the work. Billings for work submitted later than
six months after completion of the work will not be paid.
5. Upon receipt of billings for reimbursement for work undertaken by the
REQUESTING PARTY on projects funded with Federal monies, the
DEPARTMENT will act as billing agent for the REQUESTING PARTY,
consolidating said billings with those for its own force account work and presenting
these consolidated billings to the FHWA for payment. Upon receipt of
reimbursement from the FHWA, the DEPARTMENT will promptly forward to the
REQUESTING PARTY its share of said reimbursement.
6. Upon receipt of billings for reimbursement for work undertaken by the
REQUESTING PARTY on projects funded with non-Federal monies, the
DEPARTMENT will promptly forward to the REQUESTING PARTY
reimbursement of eligible costs.
B. Payment of Contracted and DEPARTMENT Costs:
1. As work on the PROJECT commences, the initial payments for contracted work
and/or costs incurred by the DEPARTMENT will be made from the working capital
deposit. Receipt of progress payments of Federal funds, and where applicable, State
Critical Bridge funds, will be used to replenish the working capital deposit. The
REQUESTING PARTY shall make prompt payments of its share of the contracted
and/or DEPARTMENT incurred portion of the PROJECT COST upon receipt of
progress billings from the DEPARTMENT. Progress billings will be based upon the
REQUESTING PARTY'S share of the actual costs incurred as work on the
PROJECT progresses and will be submitted, as required, until it is determined by
the DEPARTMENT that there is sufficient available working capital to meet the
remaining anticipated PROJECT COSTS. All progress payments will be made
within thirty (30) days of receipt of billings. No monthly billing of a lesser amount
than $1,000.00 will be made unless it is a final or end of fiscal year billing. Should
the DEPARTMENT determine that the available working capital exceeds the
remaining anticipated PROJECT COSTS, the DEPARTMENT may reimburse the
REQUESTING PARTY such excess. Upon completion of the PROJECT, payment
of all PROJECT COSTS, receipt of all applicable monies from the FHWA, and
completion of necessary audits, the REQUESTING PARTY will be reimbursed the
balance of its deposit.
03-15-93 IO
2. In the event that the bid, plus contingencies, for the, contracted, and/or the
DEPARTMENT incurred portion of the PROJECT work exceeds the estimated cost
therefor as established by this contract, the REQUESTING PARTY may be advised
and billed for the additional amount of its share.
C. General Conditions:
1. The DEPARTMENT, in accordance with its procedures in existence and covering
the time period involved, shall make payment for interest earned on the balance of
working capital deposits for all projects on account with the DEPARTMENT The
REQUESTING PARTY in accordance with DEPARTMENT procedures in existence
and covering the time period involved, shall make payment for interest owed on any
deficit balance of working capital deposits for all projects on account with the
DEPARTMENT This payment or billing is processed on an annual basis
corresponding to the State of Michigan fiscal year. Upon receipt of billing for
interest incurred, the REQUESTING PARTY promises and shall promptly pay the
DEPARTMENT said amount.
2. Pursuant to the authority granted by law, the REQUESTING PARTY hereby
irrevocably pledges a sufficient amount of funds received by it from the Michigan
Transportation Fund to meet its obligations as specified in PART I and PART IL If
the REQUESTING PARTY shall fail to make any of its required payments when
due, as specified herein, the DEPARTMENT shall immediately notify the
REQUESTING PARTY and the State Treasurer of the State of Michigan or such
other state officer or agency having charge and control over disbursement of the
Michigan Transportation Fund, pursuant to law, of the fact of such default and the
amount thereof, and, if such default is not cured by payment within ten (I 0) days,
said State Treasurer or other state officer or agency is then authorized and directed
to withhold from the first of such monies thereafter allocated by law to the
REQUESTING PARTY from the Michigan Transportation Fund sufficient monies
to remove the default, and to credit the REQUESTING PARTY with payment
thereof, and to notify the REQUESTING PARTY in writing of such fact.
3. Upon completion of all work under this contract and final audit by the
DEPARTMENT or the FHWA, the REQUESTING PARTY promises to promptly
repay the DEPARTMENT for any disallowed items of costs previously disbursed by
the DEPARTMENT. The REQUESTING PARTY pledges its future receipts from
the Michigan Transportation Fund for repayment of all disallowed items and, upon
failure to make repayment for any disallowed items within ninety (90) days of
demand made by the DEPARTMENT, the DEPARTMENT is hereby authorized to
withhold an equal amount from the REQUESTING PARTY'S share of any future
distribution of Michigan Transportation Funds in settlement of said claim.
03-15-93 11
4. The DEPARTMENT shall maintain and keep accurate records and accounts relative
to the cost of the PROJECT and upon completion of the PROJECT, payment of all
items of PROJECT COST, receipt of all Federal Aid, if any, and completion of final
audit by the DEPARTMENT and if applicable, by the FHWA, shall make final
accounting to the REQUESTING PARTY. The final PROJECT accounting will not
include interest earned or charged on working capital deposited for the PROJECT
which will be accounted for separately at the close of the State of Michigan fiscal
year and as set forth in Section C( 1).
5. The costs of engineering and other services performed on those projects involving
specific program funds and one hundred percent (I 00%) local funds will be appor-
tioned to the respective portions of that project in the same ratio as the actual direct
construction costs unless otherwise specified in PART I.
03-15-93 12
SECTION IV
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION
A. Upon completion of construction of each part of the PROJECT, at no cost to the
DEPARTMENT or the PROJECT, each of the parties hereto, within their respective
jurisdictions, will make the following provisions for the maintenance and operation of the
completed PROJECT:
I. All Projects:
Properly maintain and operate each part of the project, making ample provisions each
year for the performance of such maintenance work as may be required, except as
qualified in paragraph 2b of this section.
2. Projects Financed in Part with Federal Monies:
a. Sign and mark each part of the PROJECT, in accordance with the current
Michigan Manual of Uniform Traffic control Devices, and will not install, or
permit to be installed, any signs, signals or markings not in conformance with
the standards approved by the FHWA, pursuant to 23 USC I 09(d).
b. Remove, prior to completion of the PROJECT, all encroachments from the
roadway right-of-way within the limits of each part of the PROJECT.
With respect to new or existing utility installations within the right-of-way
of Federal Aid projects and pursuant to FAPG (23 CFR 645B): Occupancy
of non-limited access right-of-way may be allowed based on consideration for
traffic safety and necessary preservation of roadside space and aesthetic
quality. Longitudinal occupancy of non-limited access right-of-way by
private lines will require a finding of significant economic hardship, the
unavailability of practicable alternatives or other extenuating circumstances.
c. Cause to be enacted, maintained and enforced, ordinances and regulations for
proper traffic operations in accordance with the plans of the PROJECT.
d. Make no changes to ordinances or regulations enacted, or traffic controls
installed in conjunction with the PROJECT work without prior review by the
DEPARTMENT and approval of the FHWA, if required.
03-15-93 13
B. On projects for the removal of roadside obstacles, the parties, upon completion of
construction of each part of the PROJECT, at no cost to the PROJECT or the
DEPARTMENT, will, within their respective jurisdictions, take such action as is necessary
to assure that the roadway right-of-way, cleared as the PROJECT, will be maintained free
of such obstacles.
C. On projects for the construction of bikeways, the parties will enact no ordinances or
regulations prohibiting the use of bicycles on the facility hereinbefore described as the
PROJECT, and will amend any existing restrictive ordinances in this regard so as to allow
use of this facility by bicycles. No motorized vehicles shall be permitted on such bikeways
or walkways constructed as the PROJECT except those for maintenance purposes.
D. Failure of the parties hereto to fulfill their respective responsibilities as outlined herein may
disqualify that party from future Federal-aid participation in projects on roads or streets for
which it has maintenance responsibility. Federal Aid may be withheld until such time as
deficiencies in regulations have been corrected, and the improvements constructed as the
PROJECT are brought to a satisfactory condition of maintenance.
03-15-93 14
SECTIONV
SPECIAL PROGRAM AND PROJECT CONDITIONS
A. Those projects for which the REQUESTING PARTY has been reimbursed with Federal
monies for the acquisition of right-of-way must be under construction by the close of the
twentieth (20th) fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the FHW A and the
DEPARTMENT projects agreement covering that work is executed, or the REQUESTING
PARTY maybe required to repay to the DEPARTMENT, for forwarding to the FHWA, all
monies distributed as the FHWA'S contribution to that right-of-way.
B. Those projects for which the REQUESTING PARTY has been reimbursed with Federal
monies for the performance of preliminary engineering must be under construction by the
close of the tenth (I 0th) fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the FHWA and the
DEPARTMENT projects agreement covering that work is executed, or the REQUESTING
PARTY may be required to repay to the DEPARTMENT, for forwarding to the FHWA, all
monies distributed as the FHWA'S contribution to that preliminary engineering.
C. On those projects funded with Federal monies, the REQUESTING PARTY, at no cost to the
PROJECT or the DEPARTMENT, will provide such accident information as is available and
such other information as may be required under the program in order to make the proper
assessment of the safety benefits derived from the work performed as the PROJECT. The
REQUESTING PARTY will cooperate with the DEPARTMENT in the development of
reports and such analysis as may be required and will, when requested by the
DEPARTMENT, forward to the DEPARTMENT, in such form as is necessary, the required
information.
D. In connection with the performance of PROJECT work under this contract the parties hereto
(hereinafter in Appendix "A" referred to as the "contractor") agree to comply with the State
of Michigan provisions for "Prohibition of Discrimination in State Contracts", as set forth
in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The parties further covenant that
they will comply with the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, being P.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, as
amended, being Title 42 U.S.C. Sections 1971, 1975a-1975d, and 2000a-2000h-6 and the
Regulations of the United States Department of Transportation (49 C.F.R. Part 21) issued
pursuant to said Act, including Appendix "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, and
will require similar covenants on the part of any contractor or subcontractor employed in the
performance of this contract.
E. The parties will carry out the applicable requirements of the DEPARTMENT'S
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program and 49 CFR, Part 26, including, but not
limited to, those requirements set forth in Appendix C.
03-15-93 15
APPENDIX A
PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION IN STATE CONTRACTS
In connection with the performance of work under this contract; the contractor agrees as follows:
I. In accordance with Act No. 453, Public Acts of 1976, the contractor hereby agrees not to discriminate against an employee
or applicant for employment with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or as a matter
directly or indirectly related to employment, because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, or
marital status. Further, in accordance with Act No. 220, Public Acts of 1976 as amended by Act No. 478, Public Acts of
1980 the contractor hereby agrees not to discriminate against an employee or applicant for employment with respect to
hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment,
because of a disability that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a particular job or position.
A breach of the above covenants shall be regarded as a material breach of this contract.
2. The contractor hereby agrees that any and all subcontracts to this contract, whereby a portion of the work set forth in
this contract is to be performed, shall contain a covenant the same as hereinabove set forth in Section I of this Appendix.
3. The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants for employment and employees are treated without
regard to their race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, marital status or a disability that is unrelated
to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a particular job or position. Such action shall include, but not be limited
to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of
pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
4. The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that
all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, national origin,
age, sex, height, weight, marital status or disability that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of a
particular job or position.
5. The contractor or his collective bargaining repre'sentative will send to each labor union or representative of workers with
which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice advising the said labor union
or workers' representative of the contractor's commitments under this appendix.
6. The contractor will comply with all relevant published rules, regulations, directives, and orders of the Michigan Civil
Rights Commission which may be in effect prior to the taking of bids for any individual state project.
7. The contractor will furnish and file compliance reports within such time and upon such forms as provided by the Michigan
Civil Rights Commission, said forms may also elicit information as to the practices, policies, program, and employment
statistics of each subcontractor as well as the contractor himself, and said contractor will permit access to his books,
records, and accounts by the Michigan Civil Rights Commission and/or its agent, for purposes of investigation to ascertain
compliance with this contract and relevant with rules, regulations, and orders of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission.
8. In the event that the Civil Rights Commission finds, after a hearing held pursuant to its rules, that a contractor has not
complied with the contractual obligations under this agreement, the Civil Rights Commission may, as part of its order
based upon such findings, certify said findings to the Administrative Board of the State of Michigan, which Administrative
Board may order the cancellation of the contract found to have been violated and/or declare the contractor ineligible for
future contracts with the state and its political and civil subdivisions, departments, and officers, and including the
governing boards of institutions of higher education, until the contractor complies with said order of the Civil Rights
Commission. Notice of said declaration of future ineligibility may be given to any or all of the persons with whom the
contractor is declared ineligible to contract as a contracting party in future contracts. In any case before the Civil Rights
Commission in which cancellation of an existing contract is a possibility, the contracting agency shall be notified of such
possible remedy and shall be given the option by the Civil Rights Commission to participate in such proceedings.
9. The contractor will include, or incorporate by reference, the provisions of the foregoing paragraphs (I) through (8) in
every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by the rules, regulations or orders of the Michigan Civil Rights
Commission, and will provide in every subcontract or purchase order that said provisions will be binding upon each
subcontractor or seller. March, 1998
(Rev. 03/92)
APPENDIXB
During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest
(hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor shall comply with the Regulations relative to
nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code
of Federal Regulations, Part 27, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as
the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract.
2. Nondiscrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, shall
not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or natural origin in the selection and retention of
subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall not
participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the
Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix
B of the Regulations.
3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a
subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor
or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the
Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.
4. Information and Reports: The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the
Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts,
other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Michigan Department of
Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
Regulations or directives. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession
of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the Michigan
Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration as appropriate, and shall set
forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the
nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the Michigan Department of Transportation shall impose
such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appropriate,
including, but not limited to:
(a) Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies,
and/or
(b) Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part.
6. Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs I through 6 of
every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the
Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect
to any subcontract or procurement as the Michigan Department of Transportation or the Federal
Highway Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-
compliance; provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with,
litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the
Michigan Department of Transportation to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the State,
and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the
interests of the United States.
APPENDIXC
TO BE INCLUDED IN ALL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL AGENCIES
Assurance that Recipients and Contractors Must Make
(Excerpts from US DOT Regulation 49 CFR 26.13)
A. Each financial assistance agreement signed with a DOT operating administration (or
a primary recipient) must include the following assurance:
The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color,
national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any US
DOT-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE
program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The recipient
shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part
26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration
of US DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE program, as
required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by US DOT, is
incorporated by reference in this agreement. lmplementatio1f of
this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its
terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon
notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved
program, the department may impose sanctions as provided for
under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for
enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud
Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.).
B. Each contract MDOT signs with a contractor (and each subcontract the prime
contractor signs with a subcontractor) must include the following assurance:
The contractor, sub recipient or subcontractor shall not
discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in
the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out
applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and
administration of US DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the
contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach
of this contract, which may result in the termination of this
contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems
appropriate.
Commission Meeting Date: February 10, 2004
Date: February 3, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Planning & Economic Development cJII--
RE: Mall Study Committee Final Report
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The Study Committee, which was appointed by the City Commission on April 22, 2003
to study the historic significance of the mall structures, has developed a final report.
The five buildings researched are commonly known as the Russell Block (Daniels),
Century Club, Muskegon Savings Bank, Montgomery Block (National City Bank), and
the Hackley Bank Building (Comerica). To finalize its duties, the Study Committee is
forwarding on the final report with a recommendation to the City Commission.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To accept the Study Committee report and recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Study Committee recommended to the City Commission that the compromise of
placing the demolition permits for the four buildings in question be placed in escrow so
they cannot be demolished until we have final site plans and the closing on the
property.
2/3/2004
Mall Study Committee Final Repmt
By state statute and local ordinance, histmic preservation has been declared a "public good"
because histmic preservation safeguards local history, stabilizes and improves property values,
fosters civic beauty, and strengthens the local economy.
In compliance with state statute, the Western A venue Scattered Site Histmic District Study
Committee has been charged by the Muskegon City Commission to consider the merit of
designating five buildings in the former Muskegon Mall historic. (Approved Aptil 22,2003 City
Commission meeting)
This committee of five used information complied by the archivist of the Muskegon County
Museum and our collective knowledge of the area in question to complete the task. The
committee members are:
Daniel Chambers- Chair, Muskegon Historic District Commission
Lawrence Spataro- Muskegon City Commissioner, Histmic District Commissioner
Jon Colburn- Pa5t HDC Commissioner, Historic Preservationist
Mary O'Connor- Vice President of Finance, Community Foundation for Muskegon County,
prope1ty owner
Mark Brant- Chatter Development/ Arco Construction
The study committee researched 5 buildings commonly known as the Russell Block (Daniels),
Century Club, Muskegon Savings Bank, Montgome1y Block (National City Bank), and the
Hackley Bank Building (Come1ica). The study committee created a preliminmy repmt and
forwarded the repmt onto the State on September 12, 2003. The repott was also fo1warded onto
the Planning Commission for their input. The Planning Commission made a motion to refer this
issue back to the City Commission without a recommendation.
On November 25, 2003 the City Commission approved a 60 day emergency demolition
moratotium on the five mall buildings. The moratmium was lifted from the Hackley Bank
Building (Comerica) in December.
The Study Committee held the public hearing regarding the mall structures on Januat·y 21, 2004.
Chatter Development group presented renderings of the proposed development on the mall site.
As in past discussions, there were opinions put fotth for both saving the structures and against
saving the structures. The DMDC offered to save the facades of the Century Club and
Muskegon Savings Bank to be used in the development.
The Study Committee recommended to the City Commission that the compromise of placing the
demolition permits for the four buildings in question be placed in escrow so they cannot be
demolished until we have final site plans and the closing on the prope1ty.
2/3/04 2
Februmy 1, 2004 1399 Nelson
Muskegon, MI 49441
Mayor Steve Warmington, Vice Mayor Larson and Commissioners Carter, Davis, Gawron,
Shepard and Spataro
City of Muskegon
933 Terrace Street
Muskegon, Ml
Re: Muskegon Mall Redevelopment Plans
Dear Mayor Warmington, Vice Mayor Larson and City Commissioners,
The City Commission is faced with, what in my opinion are, some of the most important
decisions to be made in detennining the City's nmnediate and long-range future for our "Center
City". You, as Mayor and City Commissioners, have already established your credibility with
Muskegon Citizens having made difficult but courageous decisions concerning the Smmt Pm-k,
Renaissance Zones, and Muskegon-Milwaukee Fast Feny to name a few. I feel it necessmy to
weigh-in on this subject for many reasons not the least of which is that some proposals that have
been made m·e just plain short-sighted.
In stating this opinion, I realize that many, including the Muskegon �hronicle, would have you
believe that you must make quick decisions based upon what has b&n put before you versus
taking a more visionmy role and working toward that end by forging private-public partnerships
with those who share that vision. I do not believe you should subscribe to "the bird in the
hand... " view no matter the source. You were elected to fenet out what is in the City's best
interest, and it is your solemn duty and privilege to vote your conscience no matter the opposition.
You have demonstrated your willingness to proceed cautiously and wisely and need to do so now.
What I find especially disturbing, in much of the discussion and community forwns over the past
couple of years, is what seems a willingness to sell Muskegon shmt and piecemeal our "Center
City" planning. In my opinion, not one of the "Downtown Plans" has conveyed a vision bold
enough to attract sufficient private investment in a timely fashion. Not one has recognized that a
market must exist or be created that attracts private investors willing to risk the economic swings
of Muskegon and the Nation. Not one provides the connectors between development "nodes".
All are disjointed pieces of a "Center City Plan".
Let me provide examples and comparisons why I view these effo1ts as sho1tsighted and less bold
thmt the City deserves. The recent unveiling of a schematic design for the Muskegon Mall site
reveals a paltty $40 million dollar nwestment for this 30+ acre site and fmther suggests there is a
need for public commitment for stt·eets and infrastructure. This projected investment pales in
comparison with other investments in Muskegon. Walker and Frauenthal renovations - Millions
of Dollars; Holiday Inn $18 Million; Amazon Building $16 Million; Shoreline Inn and Suites $12
Million; Balcom's Cove $16 Million; GVSU Water Resources Center - Millions and Smmt Zone
projected at Tens of Millions. These developments exhibit as much as $10+ Million/Acre
investment. Yet, we are lead to believe that the $40 Million orless than $1.3 Million/Acre on this
prime site is something we should welcome. This site should command a private investment of
$100 � $200 Million or more if properly planned and integrated with other "Center City"
developments.
A market can be developed to attract this level of private investment with the proper vision. Many
high-end developers are just waiting for the engine to be given the go ahead before they step
forward and announce plans. TI1e Lakes Mall and environs is an example of the frenzy that will
occur with an engine to generate new investors. Without an equivalent vision Muskegon will be
relegated to accepting disjointed, piecemeal development woefully inadequate for "Center City
Muskegon".
I ask you, will an "Urban Village" of $40 million on 30+ acres attract the Milwaukee-Muskegon
Fast Feny passenger to Downtown Muskegon?" I think not! Will the "Urban Village" as
c1mently proposed provide Jobs, Growtl1 and Opportunity for Muskegon Citizens? I think not!
Will the "Urban Village" expand the ente1taimnent venues and lakefront development existing and
so desperately needed? I think not! Will the "Urban Village" turn "Center City Muskegon" into a
24/7 destination for residents and tourists? I think not! Will this proposal decrease the rumual
subsides to the Frauenthal Theater and the $250,000+ annual deficit of the Walker Arena? I think
not! Most impmtantly, will the "Urban Village" as proposed spur other developers to want to vie
for other locations in "Center City" to be next to "what's happening" mid increase prope1ty values
to levels they need to be for Muskegon? I think not!
If the "Urban Village" is to be prut of our "Cool City" it must be built to a size, scale and density
consistent with a bold vision for Muskegon's future. Your approval of this plan must not be deal
only with the mechanics of plan approval but with the substance and essence of the proposal and
its fit with a broader-bolder vision for "Center City Muskegon".
You, as Mayor and Commissions, have endorsed by resolution the Citizen's passage of the Casino
Gaming Referendum for "Center City Muskegon" proposed by the Archimedes Group and
endorsed by YESMUSKEGON. I would submit to you, this broader-bolder vision contains the
engine necessruy to drive other developers to pay deru1y for development 1ights for any available
land and build at a density consistent with this broader vision. It is tl1is vision that when
implemented will create the market for Chruter Group or otl1er developers to step up and invest
$100-$200 Million or more into the mall site.
By this, I am not, I repeat am not, suggesting that Archimedes or another developer replace
Chmter Group to develop the mall site. I am suggesting that you not approve the schematics
presented as a plan for this site. You must demand more, MUCH MORE! Once you obtain
MUCH MORE, you must provide the safeguards in the PUD approvals and development
agreements to insure that it is built to the quality and specification Muskegon deserves.
There are those who ru·e skeptical and say a casino isn't possible. Others say it isn't needed.
Others say it isn't wanted. Others, including the Muskegon Chronicle, say build it somewhere else
in the county and we won't be opposed. To them I say. Look at Manistee, Mount Pleasant,
Petoskey, Sault Sainte Mruie, Mru·quette and Detroit etc for exrunples of yes it can be done here.
To them I say. Nothing else will generate the vast amount of private investment needed in a
relatively shmt time. To them I say. If you put it elsewhere in Muskegon County it doesn't do
anything for "Center City Muskegon". To them I say. It can be of the highest quality we desire it
to be. To them 1 say. Get on board with YESMUSKEGON and help make it happen here. To
them I say. Jobs, Growth and Oppmtunity m·e knocking on our door and shouldn't be shut out.
I conclude with where I began, Mayor Wannington. You and the City Commission have
displayed great vision, leadership and dedication which has not gone urrnoticed. You must expect
and demand MUCH MORE of the Chatter Group proposal that, what has been put fotih to date.
You must demand that it be fully integrated with and support already existing facilities and our
lakefront development. You must demand that this proposal fit iu a larger "Center City Vision".
Although some might view this as a lost opp01tunity, should present plans for the mall site not go
f01ward for whatever reason, I would suggest it is not. Past city commissions have been cajoled,
arm-twisted and threatened to get plans approved. They finally relented and found that the plans
were less than expected or desired and didn't provide proper safeguards. On the other hand a
previous City Commission demanded MUCH MORE with the Harbour Towne Condominium
development as you have with the Smmt Zone and look what fine jewels these developments m·e
turning out to be.
Communities are constantly rebuilding themselves and through change weaving uew fabric along
with historic fabric to build new communities. Your decisions for our "Center City" are an
integral part of weaving our future. Do not let others sell the City of Muskegon sh01t.
Similar arguments are being espoused by the Muskegon Chronicle and others for "huny up" and
"stand aside" decisions for other proposals they seem to embrace such as the Muskegon Boiler
Works.
By way of explanation, "Center City" was specifically chosen to reflect that development
opp01tunities abound from Coles Quality Foods to the Consumers Power Plant and Muskegon
Lake's Shoreline to Southern Avenue. This "Center City" requires a broader and bolder vision
than being proposed for the Muskegon Mall site.
Thank you for the opp01tunity to express my opinion. Thm1k you and city staff more for your
concern and dedic~tion to Muskegon. ,
Sincerely,,; ~-
-
-"~7-
----:::::;----:::=:r:., -~~: ✓E:----t/:L'...__--.....
/ ·' •>-<f/
G ~ , 7,:P ~,,-,.c::: ~ ~ ,C
' •JtavicfL Wen t1 , Citizen of Mus~gon
CC: Bryon Mazade, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ __
CITY COMMISSION MEETING 2/10/04
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM: Bryon L. Mazade, City Manager
DATE: February 3, 2004
RE: Agreement with the DMDC
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To approve an agreement with the DMDC regarding the demolition of the buildings associated
with the former Muskegon Mall.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the attached agreement.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
None.
O:COMMON\DEPTMENT\ADMIN\AGNDAFRM
JMS - O: (DMDC-AGMT)
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
2004-20(c)
This Agreement made this 10th day of February, 2004, by and between THE CITY OF
MUSKEGON, a Michigan municipal corporation (the "City") of933 Terrace Street, Muskegon,
Michigan 49440 and DOWNTOWN MUSKEGON DEVELOPMENT CO., a Michigan non-
profit corporation (the "DMDC") of 425 West Western Avenue, Muskegon, Michigan 49440,
with reference to the following facts:
A. DMDC is the owner of certain real estate located in the City of Muskegon
bordered by Terrace Street on the north, Third Street on the south, Clay Street on the east and
Morris Street on the west, which was formerly known as the Muskegon Mall (the "Property").
B. DMDC is engaged in the redevelopment of the Property and is in the process of
demolishing portions of the old Mall premises to prepare the Property for redevelopment.
C. DMDC is in the process of seeking a developer for the Property.
D. DMDC has requested issuance of a demolition permit to allow for demolition of
four buildings located within or adjacent to the former Mall premises (the Century Club
(excluding the fa9ade), the Daniels Building, the Muskegon Savings Bank Building (except the
front and side fa9ade), and the National Cities Bank Building).
E. The City has indicated its desire to consider the four buildings as historic
structures and, as such, has issued a moratorium on demolition permits pursuant to MCL
399.214(4) while that issue is considered.
F. The City and DMDC have now reached an agreement that DMDC may proceed
with demolition of the remaining buildings in question, (excluding the facade of the Century
Club and the front and side fa9ade of the Muskegon Savings Bank), subject to the terms and
conditions set forth herein.
The parties, therefore, agree as follows:
I. The City agrees as follows:
(a) City will allow the present moratorium to expire and will not adopt a new
moratorium as to the Property so long as DMDC and any successor or party in
interest with DMDC comply with this Agreement;
(b) The City declines to, and will not, establish a historic district including the
Century Club, Daniels Building, Muskegon Savings Bank Building and the
National Cities Bank Building, or any one of them,
G:IEDS I\FILES\00100\ 1884\AG\B E0 14 7. DOC I
(c) The City has prepared a demolition permit for the Century Club
(excluding the front fa9ade), the Daniels Building, the Muskegon Savings Bank
Building (excluding the front and side facades), and the National Cities Bank
Building.
(d) City shall issue a demolition permit forthwith for the Century Club
(excluding the front fa9ade), the Daniels Building, the Muskegon Savings Bank
Building (excluding the front and side fa9ade), and the National Cities Bank
Building upon completion of the following:
(i) approval by all requisite public bodies of a site plan for the
proposed development on the Property which shows that the front far;:ade
of the Century Club and the front and side facades of the Muskegon
Savings Bank have been retained in their present locations; and
(ii) submission by DMDC and/or Charter of drawings from a structural
engineer evidencing support of the facades during and after demolition of
the buildings.
2. DMDC and Charter agree as follows:
(a) DMDC and/or Charter (1) shall not apply for a demolition permit, and pay
the required fee of $781.00, tmtil DMDC and/or Charter has filed a site plan and
has received all legally required approvals of the site plan, and (2) has closed on
the sale of the property to the developer who submitted the approved site plan.
(b) DMDC and/or Charter agree to provide evidence satisfactory to the City
Manager, which may be provided as a confidential document pursuant to MCL
Section 15.243(l)(f), ofits financial ability to construct the buildings described in
the site plan.
(c) DMDC and/or Charter agree the site plan shall use the front fa9ade of the
Century Club and the front and side fa9ade (east and south walls) of the
Muskegon Savings Bank in their present location.
3. Throughout this agreement, reference to DMDC includes not only itself but also
any other entity having an interest in the Property through an acquisition of an interest
from DMDC, working in cooperation with DMDC, or as an agent of DMDC.
4. Duplicate counterparts of this Memorandum of Agreement have been executed by
the parties on the day and year above first written.
G:\EDSI\FlLES\00100\1884\AG\B E0147 .DOC 2
/
DOWNTOWN MUSKEGON
DEVELOPMENT CO.
By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Chris A. McGuigan,
Its President
Charter Development hereby agrees to the terms of paragraph 2 to the extent it is the
entity that submits a site plan and becomes the developer or owner of the Property:
By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Douglas Bock, Charter Development
G:\EDS I\FI LES\00100\ 1884\AG\B E0147.DOC 3
CITY OF MUSKEGON DOWNTOWN MUSKEGON
DEVELOPMENT CO.
By: - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Stephen J. Warmington, Mayor By:
-- ---------
Chris A. McGuigan,
Its President
By:-------------
Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk
Charter Development hereby agrees to the terms of paragraph 2 to the extent it is the
entity that submits a site plan and becomes the developer or owner of the Property:
By:--------------
Douglas Bock, Charter Development
G:IEDSI\FILES\001 00\1884\AGIB E014 7 .DOC 3
Date: February 10, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Finance Director
RE: Final Amendments to 2003 Budget
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Adoption of the attached year-end amendments to the
City's 2003 Budget to assure compliance with the State Uniform Budget Act. This act
requires that budgets for "governmental-type" funds (i.e. general fund and special revenue
funds) be amended so that expenditures are not reported in the City's audit as exceeding
legal appropriations. We are awaiting 4 th quarter income tax accrual figures, so the actual
budget amendments will be distributed at the February 9th City Commission work session.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: These budget amendments establish the final 2003 authorized
revenue estimates and spending limits for the various City departments and funds. The
attached schedule shows how the amended budget varies from the original budget (and
subsequent budget reforecasts) previously approved by the City Commission.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: Self-explanatory.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The budget will be discussed in detail at
the February 9 th work session.
9/18/97
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Revenue Summary By Source
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Fina! Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Revised
Available Fund Balance - BOY $ 2,951,734 $ 3,162,367 $ 2,744,079 $ 2,807,996 $ 2,807,996 $ 2,795,009 $ 50,930
~)iv(!< 1o/ ,tJ' ., ,., I-). '!: %
Taxes
City income tax
Property taxes - general
Property taxes - sanitation
$
~$
' '
1,670,955
6,692,609
4,221,258
1,788,871
$ 6,650,000
4,281,332
1,833,822
$ 6,450,000
4,281,332
1,833,822
$EY 1,805,752
68,453 $
(27,928)
(28,070)
6,518,400
4,253,400
1,805,700
$ (131,600)
(27,932)
(28,122)
1.06%
-0.65%
-1.53%
Property taxes - pass-through from LDFA II 270,337 120,000 120,000 157,632 37,632 157,600 37,600 31.33%
Industrial facilities taxes 353,742 388,718 341,539 384,774 405,630 20,856 405,600 64,061 5.41%
Payments in lieu of taxes 75,758 73,191 80,000 80,000 70,085 (9,915) 70,000 (10,000) -12.50%
Oelinguent chargeback collected 17,514 30,056 10,000 15,000 11,886 (3,114} 11,800 1,800 -21.33%
$ 12,878.483 $ 13,465,040 $ 13,316,693 $ 13,164,928 $ 13,222,842 $ 57,914 $ 13,222,500 $ {94,193} 0.44%
Licenses and permits
Business licenses $ 31,239 $ 31,525 $ 34,500 $ 34,500 $ 28,455 $ (6,045) $ 28,400 (6,100)
$ -17.68%
Liquor licenses 36.427 35,542 37,500 37,500 36.427 (1,073) 36.400 (1,100) -2.93%
N Cable TV franchise fees 204,820 258,425 265,000 270,000 265,532 (4,468) 265,500 500 -1.67%
Telecom franchise fees (Act 48) 27,483 32,024 32,024 32,000 4,517 -0.07%
Rental property registration 4,700 4,905 205 4,900 4,900 4.26%
Property Maintenance Inspection Fees 66,126 64,565 75,000 75,000 91,360 16,360 91,300 16,300 21.73%
Burial permits 98,735 103,636 100,000 100,000 103,564 3,564 103,500 3,500 3.50%
Building permits 333,798 365,561 300,000 300,000 275,642 (24,358) 275,600 (24,400) -8.13%
Electrical permits 127,055 87,788 100,000 110,000 125,718 15,718 125,700 25,700 14.27%
Plumbing permits 48,863 66,741 50,000 50,000 50,030 30 50,000 0.00%
Mechanical permits 65,495 56,222 80,000 100,000 94,013 (5,987) 94,000 14,000 -6.00%
Franchise fees
0.00%
Police gun registration 2,040 1,230 800 1,000 1,110 110 1,100 300 10.00%
$ 1,014,598 $ 1,071,235 $ 1,070,283 $ 1,114,724 $ 1,108,780 $ (5,944} $ 1,108,400 $ 38,117 _"'.9.57%
Federal grants
Federal oeerational grant $ 417,925 $ 278,308 $ 80,000 $ 15'2.131 $ 211.597 $ 59,466 $ 211,500 131,500
$ 39.02%
$ 417,925 $ 278,308 $ 80,000 $ 152,131 $ 211,597 $ 59,466 $ 211,500 $ 131,500 39.02%
State grants
Act 302 police training grant $ $ $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 17,148 $ 1,148 $ 17,100 $ 1,100 6.88%
State oeerational grant 17,569 11,316 36,635 36,635 6,117 (30,518) 6,100 (30,535) -83.35%
$ 17,569 $ 11,316 $ 52,635 $ 52,635 $ 23,265 $ (29,370) $ 23,200 $ (29.435} -55.92%
State shared revenue
State sales tax $G~;;;3
$
$
$
5,353,987
5,353,987
$
$
5,550,302
5,550,302
$
$
5,035,082
5,035,082
$
$
83,792 $ 4,951,200 $ 599,102 -1.67%
(83,792) $ 4,951,200 $ (599,102) -1.67°/o
,
S:;,;,te 0/ c/11,.,..J 1.1.fZ
CITY OF MUSKEGON
GENERAL FUND
HISTORICAL SUMMARY
Revenues & Expenditures & Fund Balance
Year Transfers In Transfers Out at Year~End
1993 $ 13,990,266 $ 13,231,208 $ 2,297,430
1994 15,301,973 15,572,689 2,026,714
1995 16,633,179 16,337,586 2,322,307
1996 17,666,214 18,018,159 1,970,362
1997 20,437,646 20,358,321 2,049,687
1998 21,643,855 21,634,467 2,059,075
1999 21,451,681 22,011,881 1,498,875
2000 23,685,516 22,232,657 2,951,734
2001 23,446,611 23,235,978 3,162,367
2002 23,617,163 23,971,534 2,807,996
Fiscal 2003 Budget Summary
FUND BALANCE AT START OF YEAR $ 2 807 996
MEANS OF FINANCING:
Taxes 13,222,842 56.7%
Licenses and Permits 1,108,780 4.8%
Federal Grants 211,597 0.9%
State Grants 23,265 0.1%
Stale Shared Revenue 4,951,290 21.2%
Other Charges 2,227,215 9.6%.
Interest & Rentals 189,407 0.8%
Fines and Fees 471,163 2.0%
Other Revenue 331,200 1.4%
Other Financing Sources 576,360 2.5%
23,313,119 100.0%
ESTIMATED REQUIREMENTS:
Customer Value Added Activities 17,371,192 73.3%
Business Value Added Activities 4,121,014 17.4%
Fixed Budget Items 2213129 9.3%
23,705,335 100.0%
j),<;'ff,fTll 17''
~
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $ 2 415 780
OPERATING DEFICIT (USE OF FUND BALANCE) $ (392,216)
('
TARGET FUND BALANCE (10% PRIOR YEAR EXPENDITURES) $ 2,397,153
ESTIMATED EXCESS (SHORTFALL) vs. TARGET $ 18,627
1
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Revenue Summary By Source
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 200_~ Original Revised
Other charges for sales and services
Tax administration fees $ 232,349 $ 258,323 $ 258,000 $ 258,000 $ 264,949 $ 6,949 $ 264,900 $ 6,900 2.67%
Utility administration fees 175,215 174,965 183,439 183,439 183,439 183,400 (39) -0.02%
Reimbursement for elections 20,534 24,455 12,000 30,000 30,648 648 30,600 18,600 2.00%
Indirect cost reimbursement 908,256 892,080 974,894 974,894 974,894 974,800 (94) -0.01%
Site-plan review fee 895 1,086 1,000 1,000 780 (220) 700 (300) -30.00%
Sale of cemetery lots 25,275 14,988 18,000 18,000 18,233 233 18,200 200 1.11%
Sale of columbarium niches 0.00%
Police miscellaneous 48,873 74,044 65,000 65,000 83,060 18,060 83,000 18,000 27.69%
Police impound fees 37,781 51,225 40,000 40,000 65,010 25,010 65,000 25,000 62.50%
Landlord's alert fee 1,630 2,630 315 315 300 300 -4.76%
Fire protection-state property 82,087 42,052 85,000 42,000 45,965 3,965 45,900 (39,100) 9.29%
Zoning fees 13,915 13,955 10,000 1-3,000 11,880 (1,120) 11,800 1,800 -9.23%
Clerk fees 1,391 2,738 2,230 3,000 2,022 (978) 2,000 (230) -33.33%
Clerk - passport fees 3,500 2,500 1,735 (765) 1,700 (1,800) -32.00%
Tax abatement application fees 4,944 1,423 1,000 12,500 16,020 3,520 16,000 15,000 28.00%
w Treasurer fees 33,708 40,635 25,000 30,000 20,702 (9,298) 20,700 (4,300) -31.00%
False alarm fees 18,806 17,738 10,000 15,000 11,429 (3,571) 11,400 1,400 -24.00%
Miscellaneous cemetery income 24,118 25,569 21,000 24,000 21,763 (2,237) 21,700 700 -9.58%
Senior transit program fees 7,986 7,376 8,000 8,000 6,651 (1,349) 6,600 (1,400) -17.50%
Fire miscellaneous 9,012 3,858 15,000 5,000 11,410 6,410 11,400 (3,600) 128.00%
Township electrical services 13,297 13,297 13,200 13,200 0.00%
Sanitation stickers 42,355 51,081 42,000 50,000 46,205 (3,795) 46,200 4,200 -7.60%
Lot cleanup fees 74,584 134,156 70,000 70,000 91,709 21,709 91,700 21,700 31.00%
Reimbursements for mowing and demolitions 75,099 129,421 70,000 70,000 158,315 88,315 158,300 88,300 126.14%
Special events reimbursements 30,610 30,610 30,600 30,600 0.00%
Recreation er~ram fees 133,183 127,558 130,000 130,000 116,174 (13,826) 116,100 (13,900) -10.69%
$ 1,971,996 $ 2,091,356 $ 2,045,063 $ 2,045,648 $ 2.227,215 $ 181,567 $ 2,226,200 $ 181,137 8.83%
Interest and rental income
Interest $ 331,923 $ 181,931 $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 48,505 $ (26,495) $ 48,500 $ (101,500) -35.33%
Flea market 22,157 27,526 27,000 27,000 31,867 4,867 31,800 4,800 17.78%
Farmers market 26,475 27,783 23,000 23,000 29,880 6,880 29,800 6,800 29.57%
City right of way rental 6,400 6,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 0.00%
Parking rentals 22,069 24,991 5,000 5,000 6,017 1,017 6,000 1,000 20.00%
McGraft park rentals 53,758 37,697 54,000 43,000 41,338 (1,662) 41,300 (12,700) -3.95%
Other eark rentals 28,081 26,232 32,200 26,965 27,400 435 27,400 {4,800} 1.61%
_$_ _490,863 $ 332,560 $ 295,600 $ 204,365 $ 189,407 $ {14,958} $ 189,200 $ (106,400} -7.42%
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget • General Fund
General Fund Revenue Summary By Source
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actucil Through Final Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Revised
Fines and fees
Income tax - penalty and interest $ 95,916 $ 166,621 $ 90,000 $ 175,000 $ 194,562 $ 19,562 $ 194,500 $ 104,500 11.14%
Late fees on current taxes 27,220 18,006 25,000 25,000 52,791 27,791 52,700 27,700 110.80%
Interest on late invoices 730 589 1,200 750 549 (201) 500 (700) -33,33%
Property transfer affidavit fines 1,900 0.00%
Parking fines 74,056 61,957 80,000 80,000 71,698 (8,302) 71,600 (8,400) -10.50%
Court fines 150,735 146,141 160,000 160,000 151,563 {8,437) 151,500 ~8,500) -5.31%
$ 350,557 $ 393,314 $ 356,200 $ 440,750 $ 471,163 $ 30,413 $ 470,800 $ 114,600 6.82%
Other revenue
Sale of land and assets $ $ $ 3,000 $ 1,000 $ $ (1,000) $ $ (3,000) -100.00%
Police sale and auction proceeds 3,706 3,089 4,000 4,000 1,139 (2,861) 1,100 (2,900) -72.50%
CDBG program reimbursements 322,587 372,492 250,000 250,000 234,079 (15,921) 234,000 (16,000) -6.40%
Contributions 33,592 31,619 11,000 27,500 35,461 7,961 35,400 24,400 28.73%
Contributions - Veteran's Park Maintenance 17,250 14,232 (3,018) 14,200 14,200 -17.68%
Muskegon County Community Foundation 13,521 7,000 33,oqo 33,000 33,000 26,000 0.00%
+'> Miscellaneous reimbursements 1,000 1,000 (1,000) (1,000) -100.00%
Miscellaneous and sundry 17,755 18,341 15,000 15,000 13,289 {1,711} 13,200 {1,soot -12.00%
$ 377,640 $ 439,062 $ 291,000 $ 348,750 $ 331,200 $ (17,550) $ 330,900 $ 39,900 ..S.12%
Other financing sources
Operating transfers in
Cemetery Perpetual Care $ 67,373 $ 56,961 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 61,360 $ (8,640) $ 61,300 $ (8,700) -12.43%
Criminal Forieitures Fund 60,000 75,000 75,000 (75,000) (75,000} -100.00%
Police Training Fund 31,142 22,281 0.00%
ODA for Administration 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.00%
Reese Playfield Fund 4,333 76,746 0.00%
RLF for Administration 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.00%
Budget Stabilization Fund 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 1](500,000) 500,000 ..SO.DO%
Special Assessment Fund 40,000 40,000 (40,000) (40,000) -100.00%
Hackley Park Improvement Fund 0.00%
Hackley Park Memorial Fund 609 9,997 0.00%
$ 178,457 $ 180,985 $ 700,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 576,360 $ 623,640 $ 576,300 $ 123,700 _-_51.98%
Total general fund revenues and
other sources $ 23,446,611 $ 23,617,163 $ 23,757,776 y·23,759,013 $ 23,313,119 1 (445,894) $ 23,310,200 $ (447,576) -1.89%
'---
----·l,N,-· "-At>~
,.'(J t,..,..r,_
€rr,..et'l~p/~4c
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Fina! Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original
/. Customer Value Added Activities
40301 Police Department
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 5,803,534 $ 5,848,623 $ 6,324,535 $ 6."174,535 $ 6,068,410 $ 106,125 $ 6,069,000 $ (255,535) -4.04%
5200 Operating Supplies 154,660 148,091 150,000 150,000 100,795 49,205 101,000 (49,000) -32.67%
5300 Contractual Services 951,902 981,682 902,000 902,000 907,969 (5,969) 908,000 6,000 0.67%
5400 Other Expenses 54,675 73,558 28,000 28,000 15,774 12,226 16,000 (12,000) -42.86%
5700 Capital Outlays 87,593 125,512 24,310 24,310 30,581 (6,271) 31,000 6,690 27.52%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 7,052,364 $ 7,177,466 $ 7,428,845 $ 7,278,845 $ 7,123,529 s 155,316 $ 7,125,000 $ (303,845} -4.09%
$ 7!052,364 $ 7,177,466 $ 7,428,845 s 7,278,845 $ 7,123,529 $ 155,316 $ 7,125,000 $ {303,845} -4.09%_
50336 Fire Department
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 2,930,180 $ 2,964,455 $ 2,947,103 $ 2,947,103 $ 3,037,824 $ (90,721) $ 3,038,000 $ 90,897 3.08%
= 5200
5300
Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
92,307
149,605
105,122
165,970
100,000
150,000
100,000
200,000
95,604
187,853
4,396
12,147
96,000
188,000
(4,000)
38,000
-4.00%
25.33%
5400 Other Expenses 12,785 20,731 20,000 12,000 12,378 (378) 13,000 (7,000) -35.00%
5700 Gapital Outlays 32,714 57,570 27.469 99,600 98,132 1,468 99,000 71,531 260.41%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 3,217,591 $ 3,313,848 $ 3,244,572 $ 3,358,703 $ 3,431,791 $ {73,088} $ 3,434,000 $ 189.428 5.84%
50387 Fire Safety Inspections
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 579,330 $ 693,916 $ 782,418 $ 782,418 $ 761,792 $ 20,626 $ 762,000 $ (20,418) -2.61%
5200 Operating Supplies 25,077 22,393 25,500 25,500 18,780 6,720 19,000 (6,500) -25.49%
5300 Contractual Services 232,848 266,610 260,606 260,606 152,279 108,327 153,000 (107,606} -41.29%
5400 Other Expenses 8,109 11,903 10,000 10,000 11,094 (1,094) 12,000 2,000 20.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 15,215 11,536 3,000 3,000 3,616 (616) 4,000 1,000 33.33%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 860,579 $ 1,006,358 $ 1,081,524 $ 1,081,524 $ 947,561 $ 133,963 $ 950,000 $ (131,524} -12.16%
$ 4,078,170 $ 4,320,206 $ 4,326,096 $ 4,440,227 $ 4,379,352 $ 60,875 $ 4,384,000 $ 57,904 1.34%
60523 General Sanitation
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 67,901 $ 67,465 $ 78,067 $ 78,067 $ 75,757 $ 2,310 $ 76,000 $ (2,067) -2.65%
5200 Operating Supplies 1,006 344 900 3,500 109 3,391 1,000 100 11.11%
5300 Contractual Services 1,351,420 1,406,612 1,432,282 1,442,282 1,491,309 (49,027) 1,492,000 59,718 4.17%
5400 Other Expenses 83 794 300 300 65 235 1,000 700 233.33%
5700 Capita! Outlays 24,847 44,725 25,660 41,399 41,399 42,000 16,340 63.68%
5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 1,445,257 $ 1,519,940 $ 1,537,209 $ 1,565,548 $ 1,608,639 $ (43,091) $ 1,612,000 $ 74,791 4.87%
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Fina! Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original
60528 Recycling
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 0.00%
5300 Contractual SeNices 257,926 218,067 260,000 250,000 230,058 19,942 231,000 {29,000) -11.15%
5400 Other Expenses 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 3,305 1,500 3,250 3,250 4,000 2,500 166.67%
5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 261,231 $ 218,067 $ 261,500 $ 253,250 $ 233,308 $ 19,942 $ 235,000 $ [26,500} -10.13%
60550 Stormwater Management
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ 7,372 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 3,835 $ 6,165 $ 4,000 $ (16,000) -80.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 4,450 1,500 501 999 1,000 (3,450) -77.53°/o
5300 Contractual Services 16,352 28,000 10,000 2,569 7,431 3,000 (25,000) -89.29%
5400 Other Expenses 600 200 200 (600) -100.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 2,500 1,000 1,000 (2,500) -100.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ $ 23,724 $ 55,550 $ 22,700 $ 6,905 $ 15,795 $ 8,000 $ (47,550} -85.60%
CJ')
60448 Streetlighting
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 11,387 $ 12,983 $ $ 2,000 $ 842 $ 1,158 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 504,551 505,079 515,000 510,000 504,832 5,168 505,000 (10,000) -1.94%
5400 Other Expenses 0.00%
5700 Gapita! Outlays 4,350 5,000 4,000 3,850 150 4,000 (1,000) -20.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 515.938 $ 522,412 $ 520,000 $ 516,000 $ 509,524 $ 6,476 $ 510,000 $ (10,000} ~1.92%
60707 Senior Citizen Transit
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 44,925 $ 44,863 $ 47,833 $ 44,690 $ 38,746 $ 5,944 $ 39,000 $ (8,833) -18.47%
5200 Operating Supplies 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 7,100 10,140 7,540 10,140 10,140 11,000 3,460 45.89%
5400 Other Expenses 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 52,025 $ 55,003 $ 55,373 $ 54,830 $ 48,886 $ 5.944 $ 50!000 $ {5,373} -9.70%
60446 Community Event Support
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 77,841 $ 31,192 $ 76,972 $ 76,972 $ 34,581 $ 42,391 $ 35,000 $ (41,972) -54.53%
5200 Operating Supplies 1,971 1,524 2,000 2,000 2,949 (949) 3,000 1,000 50.00%
5300 Contractual Services 31,071 11,004 15,000 15,000 17,574 (2,574) 18,000 3,000 20.00%
5400 Other Expenses 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 0.00%
590Q Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 110,883 $ 43,720 $ 93,972 $ 93,972 $ 55,104 $ 38.868 $ 56,000 $ (37.972) -40.41o/~
$ 2.385.334 $ 2,382,866 $ 2.523,604 $ 2,506.300 $ 2,462,366 $ 43,934 $ 2,471,000 $ {52,604)
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Fina! Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original
70751 Parks Maintenance
510_9 Salaries & Benefits $ 470,749 $ 476,360 $ 552,349 $ 552,349 $ 478,197 $ 74,152 $ 479,000 $ (73,349) -13.28%
5200 Operating Supplies 240,998 150,285 180,000 150,000 140,573 9,427 141,000 (39,000) -21.67%
53()0 Contractual Services 596,720 601,199 500,000 515,000 586,465 (71,465) 587,000 87,000 17.40%
5400 Other Expenses 2,905 2,548 2,000 2,000 168 1,832 1,000 (1,000) -50.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 75,959 152,224 52,929 52,929 85,387 (32,458} 86,000 33,071 62.48%
5~00 Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 1,387,331 $ 1,382,616 $ 1,287,278 $ 1,272,278 $ 1,290,790 $ {18,512} $ 1,294,000 $ 6,722 0.52%
70757 Mc Graft Park Maintenance
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 5,030 $ 6,059 $ 18,005 $ 18,005 $ 8,765 $ 9,240 $ 9,000 $ (9,005) -50.01%
5200 Operating Supplies 4,918 4,135 4,031 4,031 5,306 {1,275) 6,000 1,969 48.85%
5300 Contractual Services 42,488 30,762 24,000 24,000 30,830 (6,830) 31,000 7,000 29.17%
5400 Other Expenses 238 56 200 200 200 {200) -100.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 65 7,800 1,000 39 961 1,000 (6,800) -87.18%
.?.900 Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 52,739 $ 41,012 $ 54,036 $ 47,236 $ 44,940 $ 2,296 $ 47,000 $ {7,036) -13.02%
70775 General & Inner City Recreation
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 283,433 $ 281,055 $ 341,290 $ 341,290 $ 290,235 $ 51,055 $ 291,000 $ (50,290) -14.74%
5200 Operating Supplies 51,416 58,590 55,386 52,886 41,843 11,043 42,000 {13,386) -24.17%
---..J
5300 Contractual Services 135,564 137,912 97,823 97,823 123,619 (25,796) 124,000 26,177 26.76%
5400 Other Expenses 9,252 10,375 4,350 7,000 6,967 33 7,000 2,650 60.92%
5700 Capita! Outlays 383 2,500 2,127 373 3,000 3,000 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 480,048 $ 487,932 $ 498,849 $ 501.499 $ 464,791 $ 36,708 $ 467,000 $ {31,849) -6.38%
70276 Cemeteries Maintenance
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 185,819 $ 188,401 $ 196,834 $ 196,834 $ 205,975 $ (9,141) $ 206,000 $ 9,166 4.66%
5200 Operating Supplies 21,908 22,607 20,000 20,000 10,846 9,154 11,000 (9,000) -45.00%
53()0 Contractual Services 263,671 258,681 255,000 255,000 251,300 3,700 252,000 (3,000) -1.18%
5400 Other Expenses 1,199 1·, 121 1,000 1,000 751 249 1,000 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 33,975 14,626 33,165 33,165 41,908 (8,743) 42,000 8,835 26.64%
5900 Other Financing Us~$ ___ · - - - - · - _ 0.00%
$ 506,572 $ 485.436 $ 505,999 $. 505,999 $ 510,780 $ {4,781) $ 512,000 $ 6,001 1.1§1%
70585 Parking Operations
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 13,439 $ 14,831 $ 14,549 $ 14,549 $ 18,010 $ (3,461) $ 19,000 $ 4,451 30.59%
5200 Operating Supplies 2,476 1,032 3,000 3,000 1,738 1,262 2,000 (1,000) -33.33%
5300 Contractual Services 32,854 40,972 28,802 75,000 235,608 (160,608) 236,000 207,198 719.39%
5400 Other Expenses 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 4,503 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 48,769 $ 61,338 $ 46,351 $ 92,549 $ 255,356 $ (162,807) $ 257,000 $ 210,619_ 4940 46%
70771 Forestry
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 86,584 $ 84,297 $ 111,664 $ 100,000 $ 103,509 $ (3,509) $ 104,000 $ (7.664) -6.86%
5200 Operating Supplies 9,831 6,024 7,800 7,800 8,075 (275) 9,000 1,200 15.38%,
5300 Contractual Services 14,244 13,864 17,000 20,000 21,692 (1,692) 22,000 5,000 29.41%
5400 Other Expenses 1,309 394 1,500 1,500 940 560 1,000 (500) -33.33%
5700 Capital Outlays 2,101 2,844 4,359 4,359 2,458 1,901 3,000 (1,359) -31.18%
5900 __ _Qther Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 114,069 $ 107,423 $ 142,323 $ 133,659 $ 136,674 $ (3,015) $ 139,000 $ (3,323) -2.33%
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Last Budget % Change
Ori9ina1 Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original OriQinal
70863 Farmers' Market & Flea Market
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 28,023 $ 29,241 $ 34,258 $ 34,258 $ 30,792 $ 3.466 $ 31,000 $ (3,258) M9.51%
5200 Operating Supplies 860 1,644 1,000 1,000 465 535 1,000 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 19,175 14,292 7,230 7,230 14,462 (7,232) 15,000 7,770 107.47%
5400 Other Expenses 0.00%
5700 Capita! Outlays 225 225 1,000 1,000 0.00%
5900 Other Finci_[!c:_i_ng Uses 0.00%
$ 48,058 $ 45,177 $ 42,488 $ 42,713 -$ 45,944 $ (3,231) $ 48,000 $ 5,512 12.97%
$ 2,637,586 $ 2,610,934 $ 2,577,324 $ 2,595,933 $ 2,749,275 $ (153,342) $ 2,764,000 $ 186,676 7.24%
80799 Weed and Seed Program
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 0.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
s $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.0_0%
80387 Environmental Services
co 5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 179,865 $ 173,926 $ 201,491 $ 201,491 $ 181,136 $ 20,355 $ 182,000 $ (19,491) -9.67%
5200 Operating Supplies 9,023 12,389 11,000 8,000 7,859 141 8,000 (3,000) -27.27%
5300 Contractual Services 244,510 300,582 194,806 210,730 281,831 {71,101) 282,000 87,194 44.76%
5400 Other Expenses 1,633 1,505 2,000 200 189 11 1,000 {1,000) -50.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 6,556 16,123 4,000 4,000 3,396 604 4,000 0.00%
5900 Other Financing US!;)L _ 0.00%
$ 441,587 $ 504,525 $ 413 297 $ 424.421 $ 474,411 $ (49.990) $ 477,000 $ 63.703 15.41%
$ 441,587 $ 504,525 $ 413.297 $ ·424,421 $ 474,411 $ {49.990) $ 477,000 $ 63.703 15.41%
10875 Other - Contributions to Outside Agencies
Muskegon Area Transit (MATS} $ 80,163 $ 80,163 $ 80,500 $ 80,500 $ 80,163 $ 337 $ 81,000 500 0.62%
Neighborhood Association Grants 34,063 35,975 36,000 30,000 29,308 30,000 (6,000) -16.67%
Muskegon Area First 46,066 42,000 42,000 42.000 42,000 0.00%
Veterans Memorial Day Costs 7,535 8,070 8,506 7,898 7,898 8,000 (500) -5.88%
WMSRDC - Muskegon Area Plan (MAP) 6,151 6,151 0.00%
Institute for Healing Racism 3,000 4,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 0.00%
MLK Diversity Program 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.00%
Muskegon Area Labor Management (MALMC) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.00%
Sister Cities' Youth Travel 1,000 0.00%
Muskegon County and Humane Society - Feral Cat Control 14,157 16,000 16,000 17,890 18,000 2,000 12.50%
Other 0.00%
_Cqntrib_utions To Outside Agencies $ 132,912 $ 195.582 $ 188,000 $ 181,398 $ 182,259 $ (861l $ 184,000 $ (4,000) -2.13%
$ 132,912 $ 195,582 $ 188,000 $ 181,398 $ 182,259 $ (861} $ 184.000 $ (4,000) -2.13%
Total Customer Value Added Activities $ 16,727,953 $ 17,191,579 $ 17,457,166 $ 17,427,124 $ 17.371,192 $ 55,932 $ 17,405,000 $ (52,166) -0.30%
As a Percent of Total General Fund
Expenditures 72.0% 71.7% 73.2% 73.3% 73,3% 73.2%
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget2003 2003 Original Original
II. Business Value Added Activities
10101 City Commission
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 56,483 $ 60,555 $ 62,793 $ 62,793 $ 59,698 $ 3,095 $ 60,000 $ (2,793) -4.45%
5200 Operating Supplies 12,288 12,538 16,000 14,000 9,367 4,633 10,000 (6,000) -37.50%
5300 Contractual Services 36,894 48,510 41,964 30,000 28,258 1,742 29,000 (12,964) -30.89%
5400 Other Expenses 7,631 9,758 11,000 8,000 6,126 1,874 7,000 (4,000) -36.36%
5700 Capital Outlays 528 0.00%
5900 Ottier Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 113,296 $ 131,889 $ 131,757 $ 114,793 $ 103,449 $ 11,344 $ 106,000 $ {25,757) -19.55%
10102 City Promotions & Public Relations
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 10,000 4,000 2,643 1,357 3,000 (7,000) -70.00%
5300 Contractual Services 24,563 26,499 35,572 29,450 27,909 1,541 28,000 (7,572) -21.29%
5400 Other Expenses 8 0.00%
5700 Gapital Outlays 0.00%
(D
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 24,563 $ 26,507 $ 45,572 $ 33,450 $ 30,552 $ 2,898 $ 31,000 $ {14,572) -31.98%
10172 City Manager
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 168,180 $ 173,154 $ 189,451 $ 189,451 $ 182,226 $ 7,225 $ 183,000 $ (6,451) -3.41%
5200 Operating Supplies 1,651 1,683 2,750 2,500 1,846 654 2,000 (750) -27.27%
5300 Contractual Services 2,055 2,563 3,750 3,opo 2,609 391 3,000 (750) -20.00%
5400 Other Expenses 2,149 3,037 2,750 2,300 1,646 654 2,000 (750) -27.27%
5700 Capital Outlays 102 1,500 500 500 (1,500) -100.00%
5900 0th~ Fir,c1ndng Uses 0.00%
$ 174,035 $ 180,539 $ 200,201 $ 197,751 $ 188,327 $ 9,424 $ 190,000 $ {10,201) -5.10%
10145 City Attorney
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 833 869 1,000 1,000 869 131 1,000 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 457,739 449,721 423,201 423,201 383,732 39,469 384,000 (39,201) -9.26%
5400 Other Expenses 0.00%
5700 Gapital Outlays 0.00%
5900 _QJt_:i~ir,andng Uses 0.00%
$ 458,572 $ 450,590 $ 424,201 $ 424,201 $ 384,601 $ 39,600 $ 385,000 $ (39,201} -9.24%
$ 770,466 $ 789,525 $ 801,731 $ 770,195 $ 706,929 $ 63,266 $ 712,000 $ (89,731) -11.19%
20173 Administration
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 120,324 $ 129,504 $ 136,911 $ 136,911 $ 133,545 $ 3,366 $ 134,000 $ (2,911) -2.13%
5200 Operating Supplies 1,784 2,050 2,500 2,000 1,437 563 2,000 (500) -20.00%
5300· Contractual Services 15,734 16,255 20,973 18,973 6,012 12,961 7,000 (13,973) -66.62%
5400 Other Expenses 7,230 5,415 8,000 4,500 2,703 1,797 3,000 (5,000) -62.50%
5700 Gapital Outlays 1,632 73 2,000 2,000 2,013 (13) 3,000 1,000 50.00%
5900 Other FinanQ_11_gJ)s$S 0.00%
$ 146,704 $ 153,297 $ 170,384 $ 164,384 $ 145,710 $ 18,674 $ 149,000 $ {21,384) -12.55%
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget • General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget2D03 2003 Original Original
20228 Affirmative Action
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 72,256 $ 84,810 $ 92,465 $ 92,465 $ 93,074 $ (609) $ 94,000 1,535
$ 1.66%
5200 Operating Supplies 1,713 757 2,672 500 528 (28) 1,000 (1,672) -62.57%
5300 Contractual Services 1,759 1,356 1,872 1,000 1,553 (553) 2,000 128 6.84%
5400 Other Expenses 2,913 4,187 4,803 1,500 1,572 (72) 2,000 {2,803) -58.36%
5700 Capita! Outlays 649 723 977 (977) 1,000 1,000 0.00%
.5~00 Other Financin Uses 0.00%,
$ 79,290 $ 91,833 $ 101,812 $ 95,465 $ 97,704 $ (2,239) $ 100,000 $ (1,812) -1.7§%
20744 Julia Hackley Internships
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 10,692 $ 8,885 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,837 $ (837) $ 8,000 1,000
$ 14.29%
5200 Operating Supplies 10 (10) w1Q0.00%
5300 Contractual Services
0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 20 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays
0.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 10,712 $ 8,885 $ 7,010 $ 7,000 $ 7,837 $ (837} $ 8,000 $ 990 14.12%
20215 City Clerk & Elections
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 208,602 $ 234,459 $ 245,398 $ 235,498 $ 237,090 $ (1,592) $ 238,000 $ (7,398) w3.01%
5200 Operating Supplies 35,327 45,977 20,300 27,245 33,167 (5,922) 34,000 13,700 67.49%
~ 5300 Contractual Services 31,458 62,596 41,000 36,500 42,598 {6,098) 43,000 2,000 4.88%
0 5400 Other Expenses 7,136 5,437 3,000 4,000 5,156 {1,156) 6,000 3,000 100.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 5,199 5,813 2,000 1,500 1,910 (410) 2,000 0.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 287.722 $ 354,282 $ 311,698 $ 304,743 $ 319,921 $ (15,178) $ 323,000 $ 11,302 3.63%
20220 Civil Service
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 132,405 $ 160,513 $ 172,583 $ 172,583 $ 176,851 $ (4,268) $ 177,000 $ 4,417 2.56%
5200 Operating Supplies 17,111 15,396 10,950 10,950 10,642 308 11,000 50 0.46%
5300 Contractual Services 22,799 22,138 23,200 23,200 19,767 3,433 20,000 (3,200} w13.79%
5400 Other Expenses 12,336 9,108 6,000 6,000 7,534 (1,534) 8,000 2,000 33.33%
5700 Capital Outlays 8,600 1,129 1,278 1,278 1,278 (1,278) w100.00%
5900 Oth_er Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 193,251 $ 2081284 $ 214,011 $ 214,011 $ 214,794 $ {783) $ 216,000 $ 1,989 0.93%
$ 717,679 $ 816,581 $ 804,915 $ 785,603 $ 785,966 $ {363) $ 796,000 $ (8,915) w1.11%
30202 Finance Administration
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 267,254 $ 280,785 $ 300,307 $ 300,307 $ 297,906 $ 2,401 $ 298,000 $ (2,307) w0.77%
5200 Operating Supplies 9,554 6,663 6,600 6,305 7,010 (705) 8,000 1,400 21.21%
5300 Contractual Services 99,977 115,025 87,050 99,600 87,221 12,379 88,000 950 1.09%
5400 Other Expenses 2,348 3,935 2,538 500 156 344 1,000 (1,538) wG0.60%
5700 Capital Outlays 2,085 4,730 2,100 3,784 (1,684) 4,000 4,000 0.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 381,218 $ 411,138 $ 396,495 $ 408,812 $ 396,077 $ 12,735 $ 399,000 $ 2,505 0.63%
30209 Assessing Services
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 6,759 $ 6,093 $ 7,620 $ 7,620 $ 6,199 $ 1,421 $ 7,000 $ (620) -8.14%
5200 Operating Supplies 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 367,367 390,926 398,051 398,051 394,707 3,344 395,000 (3,051) -0.77%
5400 Other Expenses 45 60 100 100 80 20 1,000 900 900.00%
5700 Capita! Outlays 0.00%
5900 Ott)er Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 374,171 $ 397,079 $ 405,771 $ 405,771 $ 400,986 $ 4.785 $ 403,000 $ (2,771) -0.68%
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original
30205 Income Tax Administration
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 213,846 $ 194,487 $ 227,024 $ 227,024 $ 229,175 $ (2,151) $ 230,000 $ 2,976 1.31%
5200 Operating Supplies 24,678 21,941 24,800 24,800 20,667 4,133 21,000 (3,800) -15.32%
5300 Contractual Services 34,092 49,928 40,263 40,263 46,251 {5,988) 47,000 6,737 16.73%
5400 Other Expenses 1,648 1,410 1,000 1,000 642 358 1,000 0.00%
5700 Capita! Outlays 206 5,807 2,000 2,000 1,437 563 2,000 0.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses
0.00%
$ 2741470 $ 273,573 $ 295,087 $ 295,087 $ 298,172 $ {3,085} $ 301,000 $ 5,913 i.00%
30253 City Treasurer
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 236,759 $ 272,839 $ 295,645 $ 295,645 $ 290,796 $ 4,849 $ 291,000 $ (4,645) -1.57%
5200 Operating Supplies 35,489 32,865 32,232 32,232 33,750 (1,518) 34,000 1,768 5.49%
5300 Contractual Services 49,210 43,750 33,500 41,000 65,831 (24,831) 66,000 32,500 97.01%
5400 Other Expenses 900 2,933 1,500 1,500 545 955 1,000 (500) -33.33%
5700 Capital Outlays 4,281 12,653 4,000 4,000 2,652 1,348 3,000 (1,000) -25.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses 0.00%
$ 326,639 $ 365,040 $ 366,877 $ 374,377 $ 393,574 $ {19,197) $ 395,000 $ 28,123 7.67%
30248 Information Systems Administration
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 182,403 $ 235,640 $ 259,055 $ 259,055 $ 260,209 $ (1,154) $ 261,000 $ 1,945 0.75%
5200 Operating Supplies 2,024 2,345 4,700 4,700 1,361 3,339 2,000 (2,700) -57.45%
5300 Contractual Services 72,769 66,905 53,249 53,249 44,653 8,596 45,000 (8,249)
~ -15.49%
~ 5400 Other Expenses 12,457 8,049 9,000 9,000 7,619 1,381 8,000 (1,000) -11.11%
5700 Capital Outlays 53,828 37,893 26,497 26,497 43,907 (17,410) 44,000 17,503 66.06%
5900 Other Fin.@!l.fk!g__l,J_§f:!S
0.00%
$ 323,481 $ 350,832 $ 352,501 $ 352,501 $ 357,749 $ {5,248) $ 360,000 $ 7,499 2.13%
$ 1,679,979 $ 1,797,662 $ 1,816,731 $ 1,836,548 $ 1,846,558 $ (10,010) $ 1,858,000 $ 41,269 2.27%
60265 City Hall Maintenance
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 64,853 $ 66,138 $ 65,153 $ 65,153 $ 67,355 $ (2,202) $ 68,000 $ 2,847 4.37%
5200 Operating Supplies 12,457 15,693 14,850 14,850 12,925 1,925 13,000 (1,850) -12.46%
5300 Contractual Services 214,595 203,498 190,000 190,000 188,186 1,814 189,000 (1,000) -0.53%
5400 Other Expenses 598 500 500 500 (500) -100.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 253 12,500 8,477 8,477 409 8,068 1,000 (7,477) -88.20%
5900 Other Financingl,Jses 0.00%
$ 292,756 $ 297,829 $ 278,980 $ 278,980 $ 268,875 $ 10,105 $ 271,000 $ (7,980) -2.86%
$ 292,756 $ 297,829 $ 278,980 $ 278,980 $ 268,875 $ 10,105 $ 271,000 $ (7,980) -2.86"{0_
80400 Planning, Zoning and Economic Development
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 387,005 $ 393,435 $ 437,835 $ 437,835 $ 424,969 $ 12,866 $ 425,000 $ (12,835) -2.93%
5200 Operating Supplies 19,455 12,765 14,000 16,000 14,518 1,482 15,000 1,000 7.14%
5300 Contractual Services 87,314 44,078 50,300 50,300 67,030 (16,730) 68,000 17,700 35.19%
5400 Other Expenses 9,751 10,293 6,964 6,964 4,278 2,686 5,000 (1,964) -28.20%
5700 Capital Outlays 3,644 6,239 3,000 3,000 1,891 1,109 2,000 (1,000) -33.33%
5900 Other Financing Uses 0.00%
$ 507,169 $ 466,810 $ 512,099 $ 514,099 $ 512,686 $ 1,413 $ 515,000 $ 2,901 0.57%
$ 507,169 $ 466,810 $ 512,099 $ 514,099 $ 512,686 $ 1,413 $ 515,000 $ 2 901 0.57%
Total Business Value Added Activities $ 3,968,049 $ 4,168,407 $ 4,214,456 $ 4,185,425 $ 4,121,014 $ 64,411 $ 4,152,000 $ (62,456) -1.48%
As a Percent of Total General Fund
Ex_p~nditures 17.1% 17.4% 17.7% 17.6% 17.4% 17.5%
City of Muskegon
Quarterly Budget Reforecast and 2004 Proposed Budget - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Last Budget % Change
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Through Final Amended Change From From 2003
Actual 2001 Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Variance Budget 2003 2003 Original Original
II. Fixed Budget Items
30999 Transfers To Other Funds
Major Street Fund $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00%
Local Street Fund 820,000 850,000 700,000 620,000 870,000 (250,000) 870,000 170,000 24.29%
Budget Stabilization Fund 250,000
0.00%
L.C. Walker Arena Fund (Operating Subsidy) 301,000 271,837 260,000 140,000 210,000 (70,000) 210,000 (50,000) ·19.23%
Public Improvement Fund (Fire Equipment Reserve) 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0.00%
State Grants Fund (Grant Matches) 105,000 10,856 (10,856) 11,000 11,000 0.00%
MOD State Rehab Loan Fund
TJFA Debt Service Fund
0.00%
0.00%
Irge_ R,eplacem~
0.00%
$ 1,521,000 $ 1,476,837 $ 1,110,000 $ 910,000 $ 1,240,856 $ {330,856) $ 1,241,000 $ 131,000 11.80%
~
N 30851 General Insurance $ 236,222 $ 281,887 $ 365,000 $ 350,000 $ 335,805 $ 14,195 336,000
$ $ {29,000) -7.95%
30906 Debt Retirement 375,101 216,860 212,006 220,000 2'17,397 2,603 218,000 5,994 2.83%
10891 Contingency and Bad Debt Expense 268,110 495,550 400,000 400,000 133,761 266,239 134,000 (266,000) -66.50%
90000 Major Capital Improvements 139,543 140,414 85,000 276,662 285,310 (8,648) 286,000 201,000 236.47%
Total Fixed-Budget Items $ 2,539,976 $ 2,611,548 $ 2,172,006 $ 2,156,662 $ 2,213,129 $ (56,467) $ 2,215,000 $ 42,994 1.98%
As a Percent of Total General Fund
Expenditures 10.9% 10.9% 9.1% 9.1% 9.3% 9.3%
Total General Fund $ 23,235,978 $ 23,971,534 $ 23,843,628 $ 23,769,211 $ 23,705,335 $ 63,876 $ 23,772,000 (71,628)
$ -0.30%
p.e,,,-~ <'fh1rrvll<IK ('.'J_,.n,
5100
Recap: Total General Fund By Expenditure Object
Salaries & Benefits $ 12,895,861 $ 13,226,336 $ 14,246,608 $ 14,063,901 $ 13,805,336 $
te
$ 13,819,000 $ (427,608) -3.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 790,815 705,722 728,431 690,299 586,173 598,000 (130,431) -17.91%
5300 Contractual Services 6,991,218 7,496,547 7,092,034 7,173,996 7,108,532 7,126,000 33,966 0.48%
5400 Other Expenses 159,350 186,615 127,105 108,264 86,383 98,000 (29,105) ·22.90%
5700 Capital Outlays 502,633 662,617 327,444 602,751 660,658 672,000 344,556 105.23%
5900 All Other Flnancin Uses 1,896,101 1,693,697 1,322,006 1,130,000 1,458,253 1,459,000 136,994 10.36%
Total General Fund $ 23,235,978 $ 23,971,534 $ 23,843,628 $ 23.769,211 $ 23,705,335 $ 23.772,000 $ (71.628) -0.30%
It
4,c,,/ f r /Lt'.' wn)J:',.~
rrlJu> /:en /~,y<l,J ,,ff'-< I .!~1-~,>
City of Muskegon
2002 Final Amended Budget. Other Budgeted Funds
Last Budget
Original Budget Reforecast Actual Thru Final 2003 Change From
Actual 2002 Estimate 2003 (9/30/2003) December 2003 Ameded Budget Latest Reforecast
Other Budgeted Funds • Revenues
Special Revenue Funds:
202 Motor Vehicle Highway - Major $ 9,316,368 $ 14,901,503 $ 9,699,503 $ 7,745,604 $ 8,345,600 $ (1,353,903)
203 Motor Vehicle Highway - Local 1,847,769 1,584,351 3,005,351 3,659,920 3,659,900 654,549
254 LC Walker Arena 895,590 855,500 872,800 927,448 927,400 54,600
230 Enterprise Community Fund 85,981 85,900 85,900
257 Budget Stabllizatlon Fund
260 Land Reutilization Fund 553 1,000 1,000 414 400 (600)
285 Tree Replacement Fund 204 3,000 3,000 5,204 5,200 2,200
264 Criminal Forleitures Fund 97,071 50,000 5,000 39,944 39,900 34,900
$ 12,157,555 $ 17,395,354 $ 13,586,654 $ 12,464,515 $ 13,064,300 $ (522,354)
Other Budgeted Funds • Expenditures
Special Revenue Funds:
202 Motor Vehicle Highway - Major $ 10,056,265 $ 16,260,703 $ 10,877,703 $ 8,135,648 $ 8,736,000 $ (2,141,703)
203 Motor Vehicle Highway - Local 1,994,815 1,619,186 3,012,186 3,466,872 3,467,000 454,814
254 LC Walker Arena 880,247 874,081 874,081 928,571 929,000 54,919
230 Enterprise Community Fund 85,981 86,000 86,000
257 Budget Stabilization Fund 500,000 400,000 400,000 (100,000)
260 Land Reutlllzation Fund 1,000 1,000 (1,000)
285 Tree Replacement Fund 1,075 3,000 3,000 400 1,000 (2,000)
264 Criminal Forfeitures Fund 16 478 75,000 75,000 1,972 2,000 (73,000)
$ 12,948,880 $ 18,832,970 $ 15,342,970 $ 13,019,444 $ 13,621,000 $ (1,721,970)
Other Budgeted Funds • Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Special Revenue Funds:
202 Motor Vehicle Highway• Major $ (739,897) $ (1,359,200) $ (1,178,200) $ (390,044) $ (390,400) $ 787,800
203 Motor Vehicle Highway• Local (147,046) (34,835) (6,835) 193,048 192,900 199,735
254 LC Walker Arena 15,343 (18,581) (1,281) (1,123) (1,600) (319)
230 Enterprise Community Fund (100) (100)
257 Budget Stabilization Fund (500,000) (400,000) (400,000) 100,000
260 Land Reutilization Fund 553 414 400 400
.285 Tree Replacement Fund (871) 4,804 4,200 4,200
264 Criminal Forfeitures Fund 80,593 (25,000) (70,000) 37,972 37,900 107,900
$ (791,325) $ (1,437,616) $ (1,756,316) $ (554,929) $ (556,700) $ 1,199,616
13
Date: February 9, 2004
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
From: DPW - Water Filtration Plant
RE: Laboratory and Employee Facilities
Improvements project
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To enlist Muskegon Construction Company to perform the Laboratory
and Employee Facilities Improvement project at the Water Filtration
Plant.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Additional project cost of $256,800.00.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
The project cost will be funded with Drinking Water Revolving Loan
Fund (DWRF) money.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend making a change to the Water Filtration Plant
Improvements project contract with Muskegon Construction Company,
to perform the Laboratory and Employee Facilities Improvement project
at an additional cost of $256,800.00.
MEMORANDUM
1/28/04
TO: R. KUHN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: R. VENEKLASEN, WATER FILTRATION SUPV.
RE: LABORATORY REMODELING PROJECT BIDS
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The laboratory remodeling was first recommended in the 1991 Reliability Study as a
Priority 111 item The study suggests, "Remodel the existing laboratory into a Plant control
room and shift operator offices and remodel the second floor to proivde for additional
laboratory space". The recommendation also provided for remodeling of the east plant
entrance and making better use of the existing lobby.
The east entrance was updated as part of the Multi-Purpose Building project. The
second floor suggestions is no longer necessary due tot he abandonment of the room
previously used for chlorine storage and application. Portions of this recommendation
are included in the following explanation
HISTORY
The present laboratory is a mix of two eras; the original 1937 laboratory to the south and
the 1964 addition on the north end which included the Plant control panel. The control
panel was replaced in 1993 with computers as part of the Instrumentation and Control
project. To date, both portions of the laboratory/control room have the original fixtures,
cabinets, and benchtops.
LABORATORY REMODELING
The remodeling is planned to update furnishings of 40 to 65 years of age and to create
more efficient workspaces. It is intended to create an operation/control area, treatment
wet-lab area, bacteriological lab area, and a work are for the Chief Operator. The intent
is to enlarge the laboratory area into a portion of the space occupied by the present staff
break/lunch room.
The present locker room space is inadequate as it cannot accommodate lockers for all
ten staff members. By using the remainder fo the breakroom space , the locker room
will be capable of accommodating all staff members.
The old chlorine room has been vacant since we began the use of sodium hypochlorite
and it's application from the Multi-Purpose Building. It is expected this room will become
the break/lunch room. The akjacent room previously used for aluminum sulfate and
fluoride application pumps and equipment will be used as a kitchenette - for such things
as the coffeemaker, microwave, oven, and refrigerator. The aluminum sulfate and
fluoride is now applied from the Multi-Purpose Building.
PROJECT PLAN
This project has been included in the City's Capitol Improvements Plan for a number of
years. It is presently schedule for the 2005 budget year at a proposed amount of
$400,000. This cost is based on the 1991 Reliability Study estimate and subsequent
increases in the Engineering News Record (ENR).
SCHEDULE
The Finance Director contracted me with the indication that we should consider adding
any planned projects to the present Drinking Water Revolving Fund (DWRF) funding
application. He makes this recommendation due to the attractive interest rate currently
being offered by the DWRF program and that is it unlikely we will utilize this program in
the near future. He further indicated this funding has the most attractive interest rate the
City will experience for some time.
FUNDING
To date, the DWRF program deadlines for funding this project have been met. The
engineering/design and construction oversight cost for the project were approved by the
City Commission in November of 2003.
It is anticipated the laboratory remodeling project will be approved by the City
Commission prior to the DWRF February 17 application deadline and construction costs
will be paid by DWRF funding.
BIDS
Bids for the construction of the remodeling project were solicited with contractor
responses publicly opened on January 27, 2004. The following is a summary of the
responses.
FIRM BOND COST
CD Barnes Associates, Inc. Yes $448,566.00
3734 Eastern Avenue, SE
Grand Rapids, Ml 49508
Muskegon Construction Co. Yes $256,800.00
111 West Western Avenue
Muskegon, Ml 49443-0477
Tridonn Construction Co. Yes $299,498.00
1461 Evanston Avenue
Muskegon, Ml 49442
RECOMMENDATION
It is my recommendation that the City endorse Muskegon Construction Company as the
lowest responsible bidder to perform the Water Filtration Plant Laboratory and Employee
Facilities Improvements project at a cost of $256,800.00. Further, it is recommended the
project become a change order to the existing Water Filtration Plant Improvements
project contract to streamline staff efforts and paperwork; with the understanding that
bonding and insurance coverage is to be altered to encompass the additional work.
January 28, 2004
Mr. Robert Veneklasen
Water Filtration Plant Supervisor
City of Muskegon
Water Filtration Plant
1900 Beach Street
Muskegon,MI 49441
Re: Muskegon Wate1· Filtrntion Plant
Laborntory Impl'OVements
Contract No. 0482.031-W-2
Dear Mr. Veneklasen:
Bids were received for the above project on January 27, 2004. A total of three bids were
received as follows:
Muskegon Construction Company $256,800.00
Tridonn Construction Company $299,498.00
C.D. Barnes Associates, Inc. $448,566.00
We have reviewed the bid documents provided to us that were submitted by Muskegon
Construction Company. The bid, as submitted, appears to be in order and all documents are
complete. We have discussed the bid submittal with Mr. Tom Lambe1t of Muskegon
Construction Company. Muskegon Construction Company is confident that they have the
entire project adequately covered. Part of the reason that their bid was substantially below our
opinion of construction cost for this project ($480,000) was that their General Conditions and
Project Administration costs will be covered as part of the W-1 Contract.
Therefore, we recommend that the City award this contract to Muskegon Construction
Company for the amount of $256,800. We have discussed the possibility that this contract
could be included as a change order to the W-1 contract with Mr. Michael Cox of Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality. Mr. Cox has indicated that this project could be
implemented as a Change Order to the W-1 contract. Doing so at this point will not mean that
Mr. Robert Veneklasen
Muskegon Water Filtration Plant
Laboratory Improvements
January 28, 2004
Page 2
this amount will be part of the 4% project contingency. Therefore, we recommend that the City
issue a Change Order to Muskegon Construction Company to have the work of the W-2
Contract incorporated into the W-1 Contract. This approach would be preferred since the
paperwork and other administrative cost would be minimized.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service to the City of Muskegon. Please feel
free to contact me if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Dennis J. Benoit, P.E.
Senior Vice President
/jlc
P:\0482031\3 l\Corrcspondence\Veneklasen 012804.doc
DATE: February 2, 2004
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030173 Address:
1263 W. Larch.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
1263 W. Larch is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be
demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be
directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with
the lowest responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: # En-030173, 1263 W. Larch.
Location and ownership: This structure is located on W. Larch between
Ruddiman and McGraft. It is owned by Deutsche Bank Trust in Texas ..
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
11/20/03. A notice and order to repair was issued 12/3/03. On 1/8/04 the HBA
declared the structure substandard and dangerous.
Owner Contact: On 1/13/04 a contact for the bank called the Inspection office
and stated the home is in foreclosure and they cannot do anything until the
redemption period is up, which is 6 months. He was faxed all copies of previous
notices.
Financial Impact: General Funds
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $33,300
Estimated cost to repair: $8,000 plus the cost of interior repairs
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMPIAGENDA -1263 W. Larch.doc page I of I
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
1263 W. Larch
11/20/03
Inspection noted:
1. Garage - roof is collapsing.
2. Garage - Separation wall between house and garage is damaged.
3. Garage - electrical is incomplete.
4. Residence - Soffitt & fascia is damaged.
5. Residence - Front steps need repair.
6. Interior inspection with building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical
inspectors required.
7. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained
prior to work beginning.
Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I
HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\1263 W. Larch.doc
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT
June 19, 2003 AT 4:26 p.m. FOR W. LARCH 1263 PAGE 1
No Cat Violation
--- - - - ----------------------------------==-----=========---=======---==
1 B EXTERIOR
Siding corners are missing.
2 B EXTERIOR
Has peeling paint and is not protected from weather by
properly applied water-resistant paint or waterproof finish.
3 B EXTERIOR
Window has glazing that is missing or deteriorated.
4 B EXTERIOR
Operable window(s) do not have a screen - must cover the
complete bottom sash.
5 B EXTERIOR
Window screen is torn or damaged.
6 B EXTERIOR
Roof has some shingles or parts of shingles missing.
7 B EXTERIOR
Foundation walls have missing mortar or open cracks.
8 B EXTERIOR
Has eave boards that are rotted or missing.
9 B EXTERIOR - FRONT PORCH
Steps have concrete or block walls on the sides that are
deteriorated.
10 EXTERIOR - REAR DORMER
Roof is totally deteriorated - must be replaced.
11 B EXTERIOR - REAR DORMER
Side of the roof has rotted or missing roof boards.
12 A EXTERIOR - SEVERAL
Window has broken or cracked glass.
13 B GARAGE
Rafters are broken or rotted.
14 A GARAGE
Rafters are collapsing.
15 B GARAGE
Side of the roof has rotted or missing roof boards.
16 B GARAGE
Overhead, sliding, or swing door is broken or missing parts
so it may not work properly.
17 B GARAGE
Wall between the house and garage doesn't have 1/2" drywall
on the garage side of wall all the way to the roof.
18 B GARAGE
Door is broken or missing.
19 A GARAGE
Switch cover is missing or broken.
20 A GARAGE
Outlet cover is missing or broken.
21 B GARAGE
Has wires that are not stapled up.
22 B GARAGE
Siding has holes in it or is rotted or missing.
23 GARAGE
Has rotten wood at grade.
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT
June 19, 2003 AT 4:26 p.m. FOR W. LARCH 1263 PAGE 2
No Cat Violation
--- --- ------====-----===------=====---========-====================----
24 GARAGE
Coping is broken.
25 A GARAGE - ROOF
Is full of large holes.
26 A GARAGE - SEVERAL
Window has broken or cracked glass.
END OF LIST
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this June 8 2004 by and between:
Press's LLC
(a corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of Michigan);
(partnership consisting of _ _ _ _ _ _ _~; (an individual trading as _ __
________ ); hereinafter called the "Contractor," and the City of
Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter called the "City".
WITNESSTH, that the Contractor and the City, for the consideration stated
herein, mutually agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. Statement of Work. The Contractor shall furnish all supervision,
technical personnel, labor, materials, machinery, tools, equipment, and services,
including utility and transportation services, and perform and complete all work
required for the demolition and clearance of 1263 W. Larch as well as required
supplemental work for the completion of this project, all in strict accordance with
the Contract, including all Addenda.
ARTICLE 2. Contract Price. The City will pay the Contractor for the performance
of this Contract and the completion of the work covered therein an amount not to
exceed $3295.
ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT: The executed contract shall consist of, but not be
limited to, the following:
Invitation for Bids
Instructions to Bidders
Bid Proposal
Agreement
General Specifications for Project Performance
Equal Opportunity and Employment Specifications
Demolition and Site Clearance Specifications
This Agreement, together with other documents listed in Article 3, which said
other documents are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached hereto or
repeated herein, form the contract between the parties hereto.
In the event any provision in any component part of this Contract conflicts with
any provision of any other component part, the Contractor shall contact the City
immediately in writing for a determination, interpretation, and/or classification of
conflicting parts and priority of same. Said determination from the City shall be in
writing and shall become an Addendum to this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to
be executed on the day and year first written above.
ATTEST: CONTRACTOR:
ATTEST:
BY:,
City Clerk
(SEAL)
CERTIFICATION (IF APPLICABLE)
I, ---'1..24'--'!--",a'---','-""'----J----=S-:::.,...::'-':.:,}<coc'--'-'-·'_ _ _ , certify that I am the_,/_·;_12__c_.;:J _ _ _ _ _ __
of the Corporation named as contractor herein;
That _TI~·
·_,_~_....,-----'~----·ccJ,_,...,..:::0c._~'-'·__,<:;...:'"-?,.,.:__··_, who signed this Agreement on behalf of the
Contractor, was then_,,.,...L=.c..,;..-..<-"'···=•,"..:.•_·_ _ _ _ _ of said Corporation:
That said Agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by
authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers.
Signed:
(CORPORATE SEAL) ,I)/;,/!
r
,X"" ""'J "·' ' I /¾'CJ
Printed Name and Title
DATE: February 2, 2004
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030052 Address:
153 Houston.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
153 Houston is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be
demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be
directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with
the lowest responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: #EN030052, 153 Houston, Muskegon, Ml
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Houston between First and
Jefferson and is owned by Ronald Wells.
Staff Correspondence: This rental house began with a dangerous building
inspection on the garage only on 5/29/03 and the residence was added on
10/7/03. An interior inspection was conducted on 10/22/03 and shortly after the
house was listed for sale. Ronald Wells applied for a permit to repair the garage
on 7/11/03, which expired before any repairs were done. There is also a housing
inspection report with 75 violations.
Owner Contact: There has been no contact since the interior inspection and
the structure appears vacant now and for sale.
Financial Impact: CDBG Funds
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $20,100
Estimated cost to repair: $30,000
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\AGENDA ~153 Houston.doc page 1 of 1
\53 \-\.O u STOlv
--------~-·-
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
153 Houston - Garage
5/29/03
Inspection noted:
I. Roof severely damaged.
2. Exterior needs to be painted.
3. Footing/foundation inspection required.
4. Windows are boarded.
5. Fascia damaged.
6. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to
work beginning.
Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FAL TINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\153 Houston -G.doc
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
153 Houston
10/71/03
Inspection noted:
1. An interior inspection is required by all trade inspectors (plumbing, mechanical,
electrical and building) before any permits or certificates of occupancy will be
issued.
2. Fascia & soffitt damaged. Repair or replace.
3. Bilco-type door damaged/rotted. Repair or replace.
4. Siding repair required.
5. Improper deck rails.
6. Seventy-five violations of property maintenance code noted. (List is attached)
7. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to
work beginning.
Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
ROBERT B. GRABINSKI, DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS DATE
C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\153 Houston-R.doc
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
153 Houston
(INTERIOR INSPECTION)
10/22/03
Inspection noted:
1. House to be wired to meet 2000 MRC.
2. Service to be replaced to meet 2000 MRC.
3. Smoke alarms to be installed to meet 2000 MRC.
4. All work to be done with permits, by licensed electrical contractor.
5. Duct work needs to be replaced.
6. Waste & vent pipe needs to be replaced.
7. Non-approved water piping installed.
8. Severe structural damage to home, foundation and floor system. Floor joists cut,
beams not properly bearing, incomplete support. Must meet MRC 2000
requirements for span, bearing.
9. Both sets of interior stairs are dangerous; non-conforming structural construction.
Incomplete support of openings - trimmer rim and header - run and rise mising
handrail and guardrail.
I 0. Missing sections of ceiling covering and wall covering - and wall covering.
Exposed insulation, water damage. Replace with new drywall to code.
11. Smoke alarms required to meet MRC 2000, hardwired, inter-connected with
battery back up.
12. Provide rafter investigation - roof is caving in.
13. Fascia missing and falling off home.
14. Both porches are failing - rebuild to code.
15. Missing windows and screens.
16. Garage is in state of near collapse. Roof, siding, opening are all failing.
17. Chimney is collapsing on home.
18. Provide egress windows - one for each bedroom.
19. Replace all damaged wall and floor covering.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C :\WINDOWS\TEMP\ I 53 Houston-interior.doc
No Ca': Vir:,lati:,n \ 53
-============-===---=--== --=========-----==
1
NOTE: Effective June 15, 1997 no certificates of compliance
will be issued until all fees and debts to the City for that
property have been paid in full.
2
NOTE: Code requires owners to notify City in writing within
10 days of transfering ownership. Notice must include name,
address and phone number of new owner.
3
NOTE: Non owner-occupants must use licensed contractors for
most electrical, plumbing or mechanical repair work. Call
724-6758 for more information.
4 B BASEMENT
Has pendant light which is not approved.
5 B BASEMENT
Has an open splice - must be in covered junction box.
6 B BASEMENT
Has wires that are not stapled up.
7 A BASEMENT
Has an extension cord that is creating a hazard.
8 b BASEMENT
Fixture has an open terminal.
9 A BASEMENT
Fuse box is not grounded.
10 B BASEMENT
Light fixture is broken or loose.
11 B BASEMENT
Stairway with 8 or more risers above ground is not bounded by
intermediate rail between top rail and steps.
12 A BASEMENT
Stairway with more than 4 risers does not have~ handrail on
the open sides.
13 A BASEMENT
Step is broken or rotted.
14 BASEMENT NOTE:
Clean up knob and tube wiring.
15 B BATHROOM
Vanity is broken or incomplete.
16 B BATHROOM
Does not have a duplex receptacle - when installed it must be
GFIC.
17 B BATHROOM
Shower walls are irfcomplete.
18 B BATHROOM
Ceiling tile are missing or falling down.
19 B BATHROOM
Door hardware is broken, missing or incomplete.
20 B BATHROOM - LAVATORY
Faucet is loose.
21 B BATHROOM - TUB
Faucet is broken or incomplete.
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT
May 16, 2003 AT 2:53 p.m. FOR HOUSTON 153 PAGE 2
No Cat Violation
---=== ============================================================-=---
22 B BATHROOM - TUB
Faucet is dripping.
23 B DINING ROOM
Outlet is broken, loose or not working.
24 B DINING ROOM
Ceiling tile are missing or falling down.
25 A EAST BEDROOM
Window has broken or cracked glass.
26 B EAST BEDROOM
Has trim that has holes in it or is rotted or missing.
27 A EAST BEDROOM
Has open ended wire.
28 B EAST BEDROOM
Room is not supplied with 2 sources of power. Must have 2
duplex wall outlets or outlet and one overhead light.
29 A EAST BEDROOM
Switch cover is missing or broken.
30 B EAST BEDROOM
Closet ceiling boards are loose.
31 B EAST BEDROOM
Ceiling is unfinished.
32 B EAST BEDROOM
Walls are unfinished.
33 B EAST ROOM
Will not maintain 70 degrees at all times at 3 feet above the
floor.
34 B EAST ROOM
Paneling is buckled.
35 B EAST ROOM A
Paneling has holes.
36 B EAST ROOM
Room is not supplied with 2 sources of power. Must have 2
duplex wall outlets or outlet and one overhead light.
37 B EXTERIOR
North steps have loose carpet
38 B EXTERIOR
Window is closed off and the material used does not blend
with the siding.
39 B EXTERIOR
Chimney has loose or missing brick or mortar.
40 EXTERIOR
NOTE: The condition of surfaces such as foundation, porches,
steps, roof, etc. could not be determined due to snow cover.
41 B EXTERIOR - EAST
Has peeling paint and is not protected from weather by
properly appliec ater-resistant paint or w 3rproof finish.
42 B EXTERIOR - WEST
Has eave boards that are rotted or missing.
43 B EXTERIOR - WEST ENTRANCE
Does not have a proper light or sufficient light so as not to
create a hazard.
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT
May 16, 2003 AT 2:53 p.m. FOR HOUSTON 153 PAGE 3
No Cat Violation
- - - --- ============================================================---==
44 B EXTERIOR - WEST FRONT
Has missing siding.
45 B EXTERIOR - WEST FRONT
West side front porch has missing siding.
46 B EXTERIOR - WEST PORCH
Has missing ballisters.
47 GARAGE
NOTE: Remove or repair properly.
48 B KITCHEN
Door will not latch or shut.
49 B KITCHEN
Cabinets are not in good repair.
50 B KITCHEN
Floor covering has holes or tears.
51 A KITCHEN
Light fixture is wired with unapproved wire.
52 B KITCHEN
Has trim that has holes in it or is rotted or missing.
53 B KITCHEN
Ceiling has peeling paint.
54 A KITCHEN
Outlet has an electrical short.
55 A KITCHEN •
Outlet cover is missing or broken.
56 A KITCHEN
Has an extension cord that is creating a hazard.
57 B KITCHEN
Baseboard is missing.
58 A LIVING ROOM
Window has broken or cracked glass.
59 A MIDDLE ROOM
Outlet cover is missing or broken.
60 B MIDDLE ROOM
Floor covering has holes or tears.
61 B MIDDLE ROOM
Trim is missing.
62 B MIDDLE ROOM
Baseboard is missing.
63 B NORTHWEST BEDROOM
Door hardware if roken, missing or incompl ".
64 B REAR PORCH
Ceiling boards are loose.
65 B REAR PORCH
Floor is spongy.
66 B SOUTHWEST BEDROOM
Outlet is broken, loose or not working.
67 A SOUTHWEST BEDROOM
Outlet cover is missing or broken.
68 B SOUTHWEST BEDROOM
Door is broken or missing.
69 B UPPER HALLWAY
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION REPORT
May 16, 2003 AT 2:53 p.m. FOR HOUSTON 153 PAGE 4
No Cat Violation
--- --- ============================================================-----
Has pendant light which is not approved.
70 B UPPER HALLWAY
Floor covering has holes, rips or is missing or is not sealed
on edges.
71 A UPPER STAIRS
Handrail is missing.
72 B WEST BEDROOM
Ceiling is water damaged.
73 B WEST BEDROOM
Wall or walls has a hole or holes or large cracks in it.
74 B WEST BEDROOM
Floor covering has holes or tears.
75 B WEST BEDROOM
Ceiling panels are falling.
END OF LIST
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this June 8 2004 by and between:
Press's LLC
(a corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of Michigan);
(partnership consisting of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ); (an individual trading as _ __
_ _ _ _ _ _ __/; hereinafter called the "Contractor," and the City of
Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter called the "City".
'
WITNESSTH, that the Contractor and the City, for the consideration stated
herein, mutually agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. Statement of Work. The Contractor shall furnish all supervision,
technical personnel, labor, materials, machinery, tools, equipment, and services,
including utility and transportation services, and perform and complete all work
required for the demolition and clearance of 153 Houston as well as required
supplemental work for the completion of this project, all in strict accordance with
the Contract, including all Addenda.
ARTICLE 2. Contract Price. The City will pay the Contractor for the performance
of this Contract and the completion of the work covered therein an amount not to
exceed $3795.
ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT:· The executed contract shall consist of, but not be
limited to, the following:
Invitation for Bids
Instructions to Bidders
Bid Proposal
Agreement
General Specifications for Project Performance
Equal Opportunity and Employment Specifications
Demolition and Site Clearance Specifications
This Agreement, together with other documents listed in Article 3, which said
other documents are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached hereto or
repeated herein, form the contract between the parties hereto.
In the event any provision in any component part of this Contract conflicts with
any provision of any other component part, the Contractor shall contact the City
immediately in writing for a determination, interpretation, and/or classification of
conflicting parts and priority of same. Said determination from the City shall be in
writing and shall become an Addendum to this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to
be executed on the day and year first written above.
ATTEST CONTRACTOR:
BY: ;Jj-t,11,,,f ~f·1,-~(Jf /o<Jvi£
( J '
Printed name and ~ .
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
CERTIFICATION (IF APPLICABLE)
I, ; ] l(l J' \o g.ef , certify that I am the \?"\ "- "':; d,,rri
of the Corporation named as contractor herein;
, who signed this Agreement on behalf of the
Contractor, was then-""C2,G"'·_,,r""'"''-"''--------- of said Corporation:
That said Agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by
authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers.
Signed:
'fJ{)~< .-&9•(
7 '
(CORPORATE SEAL) . '" ' l':\y, ~·~r
'"' I
•;;Q r?,-es
Printed Name and Title
DATE: February 2, 2004
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030172 Address:
1867 Austin.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
1867 Austin is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished
within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to
obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk
be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest
responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: #EN030172, 1867 Austin, Muskegon, Ml
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Austin between Laketon
and Holbrook. It is owned by John Joseph.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
11 /20/03. A notice and order to repair was issued 12/2/03. On 1/8/04 Chris
Davison appeared before the HBA and stated he was buying the property on a
Land Contract from George Puthuppally, who is the same person as John
Joseph. He was told if he intends to save the house he needs to bring in prove
that he has a financial interest in the property and schedule an interior inspection.
When asked about completing repairs he stated he needs to wait until he gets an
income tax refund to pay for any repairs. The HBA declared the house
substandard on that date.
Owner Contact: On 2/2/04 Chris Davison called the Inspection office and
tried to schedule an interior inspection. He was told we first need proof that he
has a financial interest in the property and if he could bring in his paperwork
today we can schedule an inspection to be conducted within a couple days.
Financial Impact: General Funds
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $15,300
Estimated cost to repair: $2,500 plus the cost of interior repairs
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004.
-
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
1867 Austin
(SHED)
4/16/03
Inspection noted:
1. Shed is in state of structural collapse. Rebuild to Michigan Residential Code
2000 or remove structure.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\1867 Austin -G.doc
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
1867 Austin
11/20/03
Inspection noted:
1. Windows broken & boarded.
2. Entry door panels broken and/or missing.
3. Face brick broken and/or missing.
4. Debris in yard.
5. Owner is not responding to repair notices.
6. Interior inspection with building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical inspectors
required.
7. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to
work beginning.
Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\WINDOWSITEMP\1867 Austin.doc
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this July 13, 2004 by and between:
Press's LLC
(a corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of Michigan);
(partnership consisting of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ); (an individual trading as _ __
________ ); hereinafter called the "Contractor," and the City of
Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter called the "City".
WITNESSTH, that the Contractor and the City, for the consideration stated
herein, mutually agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. Statement of Work. The Contractor shall furnish all supervision,
technical personnel, labor, materials, machinery, tools, equipment, and services,
including utility and transportation services, and perform and complete all work
required for the demolition and clearance of 1867 Austin as well as required
supplemental work for the completion of this project, all in strict accordance with
the Contract, including all Addenda.
ARTICLE 2. Contract Price. The City will pay the Contractor for the performance
of this Contract and the completion of the work covered therein an amount not to
exceed $2895
ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT: The executed contract shall consist of, but not be
limited to, the following:
Invitation for Bids
Instructions to Bidders
Bid Proposal
Agreement
General Specifications for Project Performance
Equal Opportunity and Employment Specifications
Demolition and Site Clearance Specifications
This Agreement, together with other documents listed in Article 3, which said
other documents are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached hereto or
repeated herein, form the contract between the parties hereto.
In the event any provision in any component part of this Contract conflicts with
any provision of any other component part, the Contractor shall contact the City
immediately in writing for a determination, interpretation, and/or classification of
conflicting parts and priority of same. Said determination from the City shall be in
writing and shall become an Addendum to this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to
be executed on the day and year first written above.
ATTEST: CONTRACTOR:
BY: f~\ 1-\o ':;y,_~L' - \',es
Printed nameind title
ATTEST:
~&&z
City Clerk
(SEAL)
CERTIFICATION (IF APPLICABLE)
, certify that I am the tc--0=1''-'u"".""w'-"e""s:_ _ _ _ __
of the Corporation named as contractor herein;
That µ \4 0 ~Dbo~ I:' , who signed this Agreement on behalf of the
Contractor, was then,_Q¥----"-§::-"'\/.-"'"4'---------- of said Corporation:
That said Agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by
authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers.
(CORPORATE SEAL)
DATE: February 2, 2004
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: EN-030040 Address:
1947 S. Getty.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
1947 S. Getty is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be
demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be
directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with
the lowest responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: #EN030040, 1947 S. Getty, Muskegon, Ml
Location and ownership: This commercial structure is located on South Getty
between Laketon and Hackley and is owned by the State of Michigan.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
5/29/03 and the notice and order to repair or remove was issued 6/13/03. On
8/7/03 the HBA declared the structure dangerous and substandard.
Owner Contact: There has been no contact from the State.
Financial Impact: General Funds
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $75,700 - Commercial building and garage
Estimated cost to repair: $8,000 Exterior only
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMPIAGENDA -1947 S. Gclly.doc page I of I
•
--- ----·--.
~.'
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
1947 S. GETTY
5/29/03
Inspection noted:
1. Exterior need to be painted and repaired.
2. No utilities.
3. Soffitt damaged and must be repaired.
4. Window trim rotted.
5. Roof inspection required.
6. Garage siding needs repair and paint.
7. Garage windows broken - repair or replace.
8. Garage roof deteriorated.
9. Fence in rear yard is damaged.
10. Interior inspection with building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical inspectors
required.
11. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to
work beginning.
Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HA VE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\1947 S. Getty.doc
DATE: February 2, 2004
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030042 Address:
1345 Fifth - Garage only.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
1345 Fifth- Garage is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be
demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be
directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with
the lowest responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: # En-030042 Address: 1345 Fifth - Garage only.
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Fifth Street between Mason
& Strong and is owned by Fannie Jones, Chicago Heights, Illinois.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
5/9/03. A notice and order to repair was issued 6/12/03. On 8/7/03 the HBA
declared the garage substandard and dangerous.
Owner Contact: On 7/10/03 a relative of the owner came into the Inspection
office and requested an extension on behalf of the owner who lives in Illinois. He
stated the property is being sold. An extension was not granted. On 8/13/03 a
potential buyer of the property came into the Inspection office and stated she
would like to repair the garage after purchasing the property. There has been no
contact since that date.
Financial Impact: CDBG Funds
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $17,800 (house & garage)
Estimated cost to repair: $1,500
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004.
C:\WINDOWSITEMP\AGENDA -1345 Fifth· G.doc page I of I
\3\\S
---- .-·
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
1345 Fifth - Garage
5/29/03
Inspection noted:
1. Roof is partially collapsed and destroyed.
2. Exterior walls are unprotected.
3. Footing/foundation inspection required.
4. Door is damage.
5. All work requires construction permits. These permits must be obtained prior to
work beginning.
Please contact Inspection Services with any questions at 231-724-6715.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRYFALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\1345 5th -G.doc
DATE: February 2, 2004
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: En-030094 Address:
1986 Ninth - Garage only.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
1986 Ninth- Garage is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be
demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be
directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with
the lowest responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: # En-030094 Address: 1986 Ninth - Garage only.
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Ninth Street between
Delano and Young and is owned by David Ross.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
4/16/03. A notice and order to repair was issued 5/12/03. Mr. Ross applied for a
permit to demolish the garage on 6/11/03, but never demolished it. On 11/6/03
the HBA declared the garage substandard and dangerous.
Owner Contact: Mr. Ross came in the Inspection office to apply for a
demolition permit. On 9/18/03 a letter was sent to him requesting him to contact
the office again with his intentions. He did not reply.
Financial Impact: General Funds
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $15,500 (house & garage)
Estimated cost to repair: $2,500
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMPIAGENDA -1986 Ninth - G.doc page J of]
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
1986 Ninth
(GARAGE)
4/16/03
Inspection noted:
1. Garage roof has partially collapsed. All structural roof system has deteriorated.
2. Structural wall cracks - interior investigation of garage is required to access
damage.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FALTINOWSK.I, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\1986 Ninth-G.doc
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this June 8, 2004 by and between:
Franklin Contractors
(a corporation organized and existing under the law of the State of Michigan);
(partnership consisting of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ); (an individual trading as _ __
________ ); hereinafter called the "Contractor," and the City of
Muskegon, Michigan, hereinafter called the "City".
WITNESSTH, that the Contractor and the City, for the consideration stated
herein, mutually agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. Statement of Work. The Contractor shall furnish all supervision,
technical personnel, labor, materials, machinery, tools, equipment, and services,
including utility and transportation services, and perform and complete all work
required for the demolition and clearance of 1986 Ninth-Garage as well as
required supplemental work for the completion of this project, all in strict
accordance with the Contract, including all Addenda.
ARTICLE 2. Contract Price. The City will pay the Contractor for the performance
of this Contract and the completion of the work covered therein an amount not to
exceed $995.
ARTICLE 3. CONTRACT: The executed contract shall consist of, but not be
limited to, the following:
Invitation for Bids
Instructions to Bidders
Bid Proposal
Agreement
General Specifications for Project Performance
Equal Opportunity and Employment Specifications
Demolition and Site Clearance Specifications
This Agreement, together with other documents listed in Article 3, which said
other documents are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached hereto or
repeated herein, form the contract between the parties hereto.
In the event any provision in any component part of this Contract conflicts with
any provision of any other component part, the Contractor shall contact the City
immediately in writing for a determination, interpretation, and/or classification of
conflicting parts and priority of same. Said determination from the City shall be in
writing and shall become an Addendum to this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to
be executed on the day and year first written above.
ATTEST: CONTRACTOR:
BY :t[f3/jl3-;() /2. f'/21/:JJ/!/..liV//JJJEst/:Jp,d(
1
Printed name and title
-,
ATTEST CITY OF MUSKEGC)JN1, )/ '\
~@ ~ By ..
c-, ...
. ' ''----\'
l-,•-t . ... ·. . -·.
/ ', ;·
.' /,. ,
City Clerk (
(SEAL)
CERTIFICATION (IF APPLICABLE)
I, ?m)tf<)/;.fRJ?.JJKI...M,) , certify that I am thef}f?.t!ELtJWC"
of the Corporation named as contractor herein;
That _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , who signed this Agreement on behalf of the
Contractor, was then, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ of said Corporation:
That said Agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by
authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers.
Signed:
)Ja,£~.FJ
(CORPORATE SEAL) ~-fevf5A)
Printed Name and Title
e.. [MJ,£1-.IU I PfK. -
DATE: February 2, 2004
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case #: EN-030029 Address:
448 Catherine.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
448 Catherine - Area 11 is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it
be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration
be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor
and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition
with the lowest responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: #EN030029, 448 Catherine, Muskegon, Ml
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Catherine between
Williams and Wood St. It is owned by Curtis Vines who lives at 1868 Mclllwraith.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
3/5/03 because the structure had been boarded and vacant for more than 180
days. A notice and order to repair was issued 3/5/03. An interior inspection was
conducted with the owner on 4/18/03. On 7/3/03 the HBA tabled the case for 60
days to allow the owner time to have an electrical contractor pull a permit and
complete the required repairs. Billy Walker Jr. applied for the electrical permit on
7/25/03 and called on 11/6/03 (date of HBA review) to schedule an inspection.
The electrical inspector went to the property and found the electricity had been
hooked up illegally. The HBA declared the structure on that date.
Owner Contact: Mr. Vines was in contact with Inspection Services to
schedule an interior inspection and he stated he wanted to fix the house and live
in it. He stated he would not be renting the structure out. There has been no
contact since 11/6/03.
Financial Impact: CDBG Funds
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $20,200
Estimated cost to repair: $6,000
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2004.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
448 Catherine
3/5/03
Inspection noted:
I. Home has been boarded more than 180 days.
2. Foundation needs tuck pointing.
3. Interior inspection is required by all trade inspectors (plumbing, mechanical,
electrical and building) before any permits or certificates of occupancy will be
issued.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\448 Catherine.doc
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
448 Catherine
4/18/03
(INTERIOR INSPECTION)
Inspection noted:
I. Tuck point block.
2. Repair wall and ceiling damage - upper apt.
3. Repair floor damage and decking.
4. Minor duct repair.
5. Service needs replacing.
6. Furnace is improperly wired.
7. Open J boxes.
8. Water systems not bonded.
9. Exposed knob & tube wiring.
10. Romex fittings missing in boxes.
11. Smoke detectors required -hard wired w/battery back up.
12. Remove all open splices.
13. Dining room light improperly installed.
14. Paddle fan improperly installed.
15. 3 wire outlets not grounded.
I 6. Bathroom outlet not on 20 amp circuit.
17. Upper: 3 wire outlets not grounded.
Paddle fans improperly installed.
Bathroom outlet not on 20 amp circuit.
18. Exterior lights missing.
19. Smoke detectors required - hard wired w/battery back up.
20. Service needs to be replaced.
21. Replace miscellaneous switch and outlet covers.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
HENRY FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE
C:\ WINDOWS\TEMP\448 Catherine-Interior.doc
Sign up for City of Muskegon Emails