View the PDF version Google Docs PDF Viewer
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
MAY 14, 2002
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS@ 5:30 P.M.
AGENDA
• CALL TO ORDER:
• PRAYER:
• PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
• ROLL CALL:
• HONORS AND AWARDS: a. National Public Works Week:
b. National Senior Health and Fitness Day.
c. Law Enforcement Officer's Day
• PRESENTATIONS:
• CONSENT AGENDA:
a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK
b. Annual Taxicab License Renewal. CITY CLERK
c. Annual Carriage License Renewal. CITY CLERK
d. Fireworks Display Permit, Muskegon Country Club. CITY CLERK
e. FIRST READING: Adopting the New Code of Ordinances for the City
of Muskegon. CITY CLERK
f. Appointments to Various Boards/Committees. COMMUNITY
RELATIONS COMMITTEE
g. Request to fly the Norwegian Flag at City Hall. CITY CLERK
h. Refuse Cart Purchase 2002 PUBLIC FACILITIES - SANITATION
i. Amendment to Lease Option Agreement between City of
Muskegon and Oakview Neighborhood Association, Extension.
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
j. Consideration of bids, Southern, Division to Seaway. ENGINEERING
k. Consideration of bids, Keating to South End. ENGINEERING
I. Consideration of bids. Ridge Ave. Cumberland to Glenside
ENGINEERING
m. Request for Encroachment Agreement, Olthoff. Black Creek to
Sheridan ENGINEERING
n. Amendment to the Special Assessment Policy. ENGINEERING
o. Resolution on Diversity LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE
• PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Plan Approval for Seaway Business Park LDFA Development and
Tax Increment Financing Plan PLANNING & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
b. Plan Approval for SmartZone LDFA Development and Tax
Increment Financing Plan PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
• COMMUNICATIONS:
• CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
• UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
a. Extension of Clay-Western Historic District. PLANNING &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
b. FIRST READING: Pension Ordinance Clarification FINANCE
c. First Quarter 2002 Budget Reforecast. FINANCE
• NEW BUSINESS:
a. Purchase of State-Owned Land for Seaway Industrial Park.
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
b. Consideration of bids, Leon, Crozier to Harrison. ENGINEERING
c. Beachwood Park Bids. LEISURE SERVICES
d. Conservation District Request: LEISURE SERVICES
e. Lifeguard Agreement with Norton Shores LEISURE SERVICES
f. MDNR Electrical/Utility Upgrade Addendum. LEISURE SERVICES
g. Approval of Lead Based Paint Abatement Contract for House at
322 Amity COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
h. Approval of Contract for Final Phase of Jackson Hill Infill Projection
Operation Rejuve-Nation A.K.A. Operation J-Hill. COMMUNITY AND
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
• ANY OTHER BUSINESS:
• PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
• CLOSED SESSION: Labor Negotiations
• Reminder: Individuals who would like to address the City Commission shall do the following:
• Be recognized by the Chair.
• Step forward to the microphone.
• State name and address.
• Limit of 3 minutes to address the Commission.
• (Speaker representing a group may be allowed 10 minutes if previously registered with City Clerk,)
• ADJOURNMENT:
ADA POLICY: THE CITY OF MUSKEGON WILL PROVIDE NECESSARY AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS WHO WANT TO
ATTEND THE MEETING UPON TWENTY FOUR HOUR NOTICE TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGON. PLEASE CONTACT GAIL A. KUNDINGER,
Qlity nf
~tatr nf fl ir4igan
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and
WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works
systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets and highways, public buildings, and solid waste
collection; and
WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and
WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction, is
vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works officials; and
WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially
influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform,
NOW, TIIBREFORE, I, Steve Warmington, Mayor of the City of Muskegon, speaking on behalf of the City
Commission, do hereby proclaim the week of May 19 -25, 2002, as
"National Public Works Week"
in the City of Muskegon, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with
the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works
officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we hereunto set our hands and cause the seal of the City of Muskegon to be affixed this 14 th
day of May 2002.
Steve W armingtou, Mayor Kareu Buie, Vice-Mayor
Stephen J. Gawron, Commissioner Bill Larson, Commissioner
Robert Schweifler, Commissioner Clara Shepherd, Commissioner
,'';J
;.'.>','.,, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\,,..I-,awrence
,-,,.
Spataro, Commissioner
Proclamation
City of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Office of the Mayor
Proclamation
WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens'
everyday lives; and
WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation
of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets and highways, public
( buildings, and solid waste collection; and
WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and
services; and
WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and
construction, is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works officials; and
WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works
departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance
or the work they perform,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ __, Mayor of the City of
_ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___, do hereby proclaim the week of _ _ _ _ _ _ as
"National Public Works Week"
in The City of _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___, and I call upon all citizens
and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public
works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our
health, safety, comfort, and quality of life.
Given under my hand and Seal of the City of _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ___ this
_ _ _ _ _ __ _ day of _ __ __ __ __ _ __
Mayor
(
19
Kundinger, Gail
From: Kuhn . Bob
( llt: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:22 PM
,o: Kundinger, Gail
Cc: Mazade, Bryon
Subject: national public works week
I have prepared a letter and a resolution for National Public Works week, May 19-25, 2002.
Which Committee gets it and do I need a Commission action form or is the resolution and a
letter sufficient for consideration.
thanks
Director of Public Works
Cit y of Muskegon Michigan
We want to be #1 in the #2 business !!
(
Qlity nf
Whereas, the President of the United States has designated May as
Qlder.American Month and Nation Physical Fitness and Sports
.•.•Mortfh:And
Wher~asLit is appropriated to honor our mature citizens for their many
Contributions to the vitality and strength of our community; and
Whereas, the United States Surgeon General has determined that Regular
Physical activity results in significant health benefits and improved quality
Of life for older adults; and
Whereas, all older adults can participate in activities that improve and
Maintain their health:
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that I Steven Wannington Mayor of Muskegon
do hereby proclaim Wednesday May 29, 2002 as
NATIONAL SENIOR HEALTH AND FITNESS DAY
In the City of Muskegon, Michigan and urge all our citizens to support
the efforts oflocal organizations that encourage older adults to enhance
their lives through physical activity.
<!!ity nf
~tatr nf tlirfyigan
RESOLUTION
To commemorate and acknowledge the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and women who have
lost their lives while serving as law enforcement officers.
Whereas: the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the
vigilance and dedication of law enforcement personnel; and
Whereas: approximately 91 men and women in the City of Muskegon, at the risk of their personal safety,
presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace; and
Whereas: our peace officers are on the front line preserving the right of the children of Muskegon to receive
an education in a crime-free environment; and
Whereas: September 11 , 2001 saw the most peace officers ever killed in a single incident in the history of the
Nation;and
Whereas: more than 220 peace officers nationally were killed in the line of duty during 2001, making that year
the deadliest year for the law enforcement community since 1974; and
Whereas: nationally, every year 1 out of 9 peace officers is assaulted, 1 out of 25 peace officers is injured and
1 out of every 4,400 peace officers is killed in the line of duty; and
Whereas: on May 15, 2002, more than 15,000 peace officers are expected to gather in Washington, D.C, to
join with the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went before
them: and
Be it now therefore resolved: that I Steve Warmington, the Mayor of Muskegon, speaking on behalf of the
City Commissioners urge City residents to join us in acknowledgirig the dedication and sacrifice of our
Muskegon law enforcement men and women by honoring their fallen comrades from across the nation.
Steve Warmington, Mayor Karen Buie, Vice-Mayor
Stephen J. Gawron, Commissioner Bill Larson, Commissioner
Robert Schweifler, Commissioner Clara Shepherd, Commissioner
Lawrence Spataro, Commissioner
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
RE: Approval of Minutes
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the minutes of the Regular
Commission Meeting that was held on Tuesday, April 23, 2002.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the minutes.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
MAY 14, 2002
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS @ 5:30 P.M.
MINUTES
The Regular Commission Meeting of the City of Muskegon was held at City of
Muskegon was held at the City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan at
5:30pm, Tuesday May 14, 2002.
Mayor Warmington opened the meeting with a prayer from Pastor Jeffery
Hough of Applewood Community Ministries, after which members of the City
Commission and members of the public joined in reciting the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL FOR THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING:
Present: Mayor Stephen Warmington; Vice-Mayor Karen Buie: Commissioners
Stephen Gawron, William Larson, Robert Schweifler, Clara Shepherd and
Lawrence Spataro; City Manager Bryon Mazade, Assistant City Attorney John
Schrier and City Clerk Gail Kundinger.
2002-56 PRESENTATION:
A letter to the Commission was read by Martha Bottomly from Volunteer
Muskegon.
2002-57 HONORS AND AWARDS:
a. National Public Works Week:
A Resolution for National Public Works Week was presented by Mayor
Warmington to Bob Kuhn, Director of Public Works.
b. National Senior Health and Fitness Day.
A Proclamation for National Senior Health and Fitness Day was read by the
Gail Kundinger, City Clerk.
c. Law Enforcement Officers Day.
A Resolution for Law Enforcement Officers Day was presented to Captain Bill
Wiebenga by Mayor Warmington.
2002-58 CONSENT AGENDA:
a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the minutes of the Regular Commission
Meeting that was held on Tuesday, April 23, 2002.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the minutes.
c. Annual Carriage License Renewal. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the request to license two (2) carriages
for operation in the City of Muskegon for the 2002-2003 licensing year. The
carriages will be inspected by the Police Department prior to issuance of the
license. The insurance coverage has been approved by Risk Management.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval contingent upon inspection by the
Police Department.
d. Fireworks Display Permit. Muskegon Country Club. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Melrose Pyrotechnics, Inc. is requesting approval of a
fireworks display for July 4, 2002, at the Muskegon Country Club. Fire Marshall
Metcalf has reviewed the request and recommends approval contingent on
inspection of the fireworks. Risk Management has approved the insurance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval contingent on inspection of the
fireworks.
e. FIRST READING. Adopting the New Code of Ordinances for the
City of Muskegon. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt an Ordinance enacting a new code for the
City of Muskegon. This Code represents recodification of our ordinances
which had not been done for over twenty five years. It is our intention to
update this book on a regular basis as ordinances are adopted by this City
Commission.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the ordinance.
f. Appointments to Various Boards/Committees. COMMUNITY
RELATIONS COMMITTEE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To concur with the recommendations from the
Community Relations Committee regarding the following:
District Library Board - Appointment of Jill Montgomery to fill the vacancy
that will be open July 1, 2002.
DOA/Brownfield - 1) Appointment of Linda Wood, 2) Appointment of
Margaret Plichta, 3) Reappointment of William Stone. Terms expire
l /31 /2006.
Enterprise Community Citizens Council - Extend the terms of those already on
the council to the sunset date of 12/31/2003.
Income Tax Board - Reappoint Mary Ann Riters to the board with term
expiring 1/31/2005.
Leisure Services Board - Appointment of James Messick to fill the unexpired
term ending 1/31/2003.
Loan Fund Advisory Committee - Appointment of Brent A. McCarthy to fill the
opening representing a member from Area Financial Institution.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the recommendations from Community
Relations Committee.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION; Appr9ve the recommendation.
g. Request to fly the Norwegian Flag at City Hall. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Sons of Norway request permission to fly the
Norwegian Flag at City Hall on May 17, 18, and 19th. May 17th is Norway's
Independence Day.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the request.
h. Refuse Cart Purchase 2002. PUBLIC FACILITIES - SANITATION
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Authorization to purchase 504 refuse carts from Toter
Incorporated. This purchase would restock our inventory of replacement
carts we keep on hand for damaged carts. We are requesting approval for
placing the order now with delivery anticipated in July 2002. We currently
have 11 0 carts in stock.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Unit cost per refuse cart $44.37 (504 per truckload}=
22,362.48 2002 Sanitation Department Budget allocated $50,000 for refuse
carts purchase, a second purchase will be made later in the year.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: This purchase to be charged to the 2002
sanitation budget Account #101-60523-5700 (Capital outlay equipment}.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the purchase.
j. Consideration of Bids. Southern. Division to Seaway.
ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The milling & resurfacing of Southern Ave., contract
( H-1541} be awarded to Asphalt Paving out of Muskegon since they were the
lowest responsible bidder with a bid price of $80,585.28.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The construction cost of $80,585.28 plus associated
engineering cost which is estimated at an additional 15%.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Award the contract to Asphalt Paving.
k. Consideration of Bids. Hervey. Keating to South End.
ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The construction of Harvey St. (including sanitary
sewer) contract (H-1545 & S-568) be awarded to Jackson Merkey contractors
out of Muskegon since they were the lowest responsible bidder with a bid
price of $170,939.80.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The construction cost of $170,939.80 plus associated
engineering cost which is estimated at an additional 15%.
BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Award the contract to Jackson Merkey
Contractors.
I. Consideration of Bids. Ridge Ave .• Cumberland to Glenside.
ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The resurfacing of Ridge Ave. contract (H-1554) be
awarded to Felco Contractors out of Muskegon since they were the lowest
responsible bidder with a bid price of $66,034.95.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The construction cost of $66,034.95 plus associated
engineering cost which is estimated at an additional 15%.
BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Award the contract to Felco Contractors.
m. Request for Encroachment Agreement. Olthoff. Bicek Creek
to Sheridan. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Reid Tool Supply Company has submitted an
encroachment agreement form requesting your permission to install conduit
and fiber optic cable in north side of Olthoff's R-O-W between Sheridan &
Black Creek Rd.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the encroachment agreement with
the supplemental conditions.
n. Amendment to the Special Assessment Policy. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: As a result of the most recent Legislative Committee
meeting, it is respectfully requested that the table under section IV of the
special assessment policy on page 4 of said policy be amended to limit the
total assessment share to 45% of the total cost of the project instead of 80%.
This amendment does not apply to new subdivisions where assessed.
Furthermore, it is requested that if the amended policy is adopted, its
implementation be limited to those projects where special assessment
districts have been created after January 1st of 2002.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None anticipated at this time.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Amend the special assessment policy.
Motioned by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Larson to
approve the Consent Agenda except for items 0, I, and B. ·
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro,
Warmington
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
2002-59 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
b. Annual Taxicab License Renewal. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This request is from Thomas Wakefield, owner of
Wakefield Leasing, whose office is located at 770 W. Sherman Blvd.,
Muskegon, Ml. Mr. Wakefield is requesting approval of a license to operate
13 taxicabs for both Port City Cab Company and Yellow Cab Company. The
Muskegon Police Department has inspected the taxicabs and approves this
request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of 13 taxicabs.
Motion by Commissioner Larson, second by Vice Mayor Buie to approve a
license for operation of 13 taxicabs for both Port City Cab and Yellow Cab
companies.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro,
Warmington, Buie
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
i. Amendment to Lease Option Agreement between City of
Muskegon and Oakview Neighborhood Association, Extension.
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the Amendment Agreement to the Lease
Option Agreement between the City of Muskegon and the Oakview
Neighborhood Association, which extends the time period to complete
building repairs on the Madison Street Fire Barn to December 31, 2002. The
original agreement required that repairs be completed by October 1, 2001 .
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the Amendment Agreement and
authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None
Motion by Vice Mayor Buie, second by Commissioner Schweifler to
approve the Amendment Agreement to the Lease Option Agreement
between the City of Muskegon and the Oakview Neighborhood Association,
and authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington,
Buie and Gawron
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
o. Resolution on Diversity. LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt the resolution listing the objectives that will
assist the City Commission in achieving their goal of taking leadership
responsibility for improving race relations.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To adopt resolution.
Motion by Commissioner Schweifler, second by Commissioner Gawron
adopt the Resolution listing the objectives that will assist the City Commission
in achieving their goal of taking leadership responsibility for improving race
relations.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Buie,
Gawron, Larson
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
2002-60 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Plan Approval for Seaway Business Park LDFA Development
and Tax Increment Financing Plan. PLANNING & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold the public hearing for the Seaway Business
Park LDFA Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: No direct impact. However, LDFA funds will be used to
finance projects within the district boundaries.
BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of plan.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LDFA Board met on April 22, 2002 and
approved the plan.
The public hearing opened at 6:03pm to hear and consider any comments
from the public. No comments were heard from the public.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Gawron to
close the Public Hearing at 6:06pm and to approve the Seaway Business Park
LDFA Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson,
Schweifler
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
b. Plan Approval for SmartZone LDFA Development and Tax
Increment Financing Plan. PLANNING & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold the public hearing for the Muskegon
Lakeshore SmartZone LDFA Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: No direct impact. However, LDFA funds will be used to
finance projects within the district boundaries.
BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of plan.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LDFA board met on April 22, 2002 and
approved the plan.
The public hearing opened at 6:07pm to hear and consider any comments
from the public. No comments were heard from the public.
Motion by Commissioner Schweifler, second by Vice Mayor Buie to close
the Public Hearing at 6:08pm and to approve the Muskegon Lakeshor
SmartZone LDFA Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler,
Shepherd
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
2002-61 UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
a. Expansion of Clay-Western Historic District. PLANNING &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REQUESTS THIS ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
b. FIRST READING: Pension Ordinance Clarification. FINANCE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Section l0(d) of the City's Police & Fire Retirement
System ordinance provides that "a member who remains in the employ of
the City but ceases to be a police officer or a firefighter shall remain a
member of the retirement system for the duration of his City employment".
This provision recently came into play when the former Fire Marshall assumed
the position of Director of Inspections. The current ordinance does not,
however, specify the benefits or contributions pertaining to an affected
employee. Attached is a technical correction ordinance intended to
address this matter. It provides that the contributions and benefits will be the
same as if the member had not left employment with the Police or Fire
Departments.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. The position was budgeted with the
pension benefits accorded to a Fire Department position.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
At the Legislative Policy Committee meeting held Wednesday, April 24, 2002.
Legislative Policy Committee voted to adopt the ordinance as
recommended by staff and legal counsel. Vote was 4 Yeas, 1 Absent, 2
Nays.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Schweifler to
approve the Ordinance Amendment.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro
Nays: Warmington, Buie, Larson
MOTION PASSES
c. First Quarter 2002 Budget Reforecast. FINANCE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: At this time staff is recommending adoption of the
first quarter budget re forecast. Since the budget re forecast was originally
presented, the following additional changes have been made: 1) estimated
LDFA pass-thru revenue to the general fund has been increased due to the
fact that there will be pass-thrus for two years in 2002, 2) the capital budget
for fire station relocation has been pared from $250,000 to $100,000 and 3)
the scheduled transfer to the Major Street fund has been reduced from
$200,000 to $100,000. These actions were necessary to bring the budget
back into alignment.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Not surprisingly, the first quarter 2002 Budget Reforecast
reflects a falloff in expected general fund revenues due to the economy.
Significant adjustments have been made in the areas of city income tax,
state shared revenues and interest income. Helping offset these losses are
stronger than expected building permit revenues, LDFA pass-thru funds, and
income tax penalties.
Proposed General fund expenditures have been reduced a net $272,234
from the amount originally budgeted. Primary changes are: 1) the
elimination of the Community Center Design capital item based on recent
Commission goal prioritization ($92,000) and, 2) the elimination of the
scheduled Budget Stabilization fund transfer because the City was able to
fund this item in 2001 ($100,000), reduction in the transfer to the Major Street
fund ($100,000) and reduction in the budget for Central Fire Station
relocation ($150,000). Partially offsetting these reductions, however, are
higher than anticipated insurance and legal service costs (see attached for
details)
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: Self-explanatory
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Reforecast and related budget
amendments.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Shepherd to
approve the Reforecast and related budget amendments.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro,
Warmington
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
2002-62 NEW BUSINESS:
a. Purchase of State Owned Land for Seaway Industrial Park.
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the purchase of a vacant buildable lot
on Park Street described as CITY OF MUSKEGON YOUNG & WILLIAMS
ADDITION LOT 7 BLK 1. The cost of purchasing this lot will be $300. This lot is
located in the proposed Seaway Industrial Park and its acquisition is
necessary for completion of the project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Purchase of this will allow for the completion of the
Seaway Industrial Park, which will result in more businesses and jobs locating
to our community.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the attached resolution and to
authorize both the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said resolution.
Motion by Commissioner Schweifler, second by Commissioner Spataro to
approve the purchase of a vacant buildable lot on Park Street (designated as
parcel # 24-895-001-0007-00) described as CITY OF MUSKEGON YOUNG &
WILLIAMS ADDITION LOT 7 BLK 1.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro,
Warmington, Buie
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
b. Consideration of Bids. Leon. Crozier to Harrison. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Leon Street construction contract (H-1543), using
concrete, be awarded to Lakeside Construction since they were the lowest
responsible bidder with a bid price of $171,599.25.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The construction cost of $171,599.25 plus associated
engineering cost which is estimated at an additional 15%
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: The budgeted amount of $150,000 (using
asphalt) will have to be revised to $200,000. This revision will be shown on the
next quarterly update ..
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Award the contract to Lakeside Construction.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Motion by Vice Mayor Buie, second by Commissioner Larson to award the
contract to Lakeside Construction.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington,
Buie, Gawron
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
c. Beachwood Park Bids. LEISURE SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To award a contract to Elzinga & Volkers, Inc. to do
the renovation project at Beachwood Park.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: $311,784.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Motion by Commissioner Larson, second by Commissioner Schweifler to
award the contract to Elzinga & Volkers, Inc. to do the renovation project at
Beachwood Park. ·
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Buie,
Gawron, Larson
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
d. Conservation District Request. LEISURE SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Muskegon Conservation District is requesting that
they be allowed to place many signs along Ruddiman Creek warning people
of the danger of contact with the water.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Leisure Services Board recommends
approval.
Motion by Commissioner Gawron, second by Commissioner Shepherd to
approve the placement of signs along Ruddiman Creek warning people of
the danger of contact with the water.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson,
Schweifler
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
e. Lifeguard Agreement with Norton Shores. LEISURE SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve an agreement with the City of Norton
Shores to provide lifeguards at Ross Park.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Schweifler to
approve an agreement with the City of Norton Shores to provide lifeguards at
Ross Park.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler,
Shepherd
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
f. MDNR Electrical / Utility Upgrade Addendum. LEISURE
SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the addendum to the original contract
with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to complete phase II of
the electrical/utility upgrades at Hartshorn Marina.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: $320,000 with a 50% local match required for Hartshorn
Marina.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: Match will need to be provided by either a bond
or a loan to be paid off by the marina over several years.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Leisure Services Board recommends
approval.
Motion by Vice Mayor Buie, second by Commissioner Schweifler to
approve the addendum to the original contract with the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources to complete phase II of the electrical/utility
upgrades at Hartshorn Marina.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler,
Shepherd, Spataro
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
g. Approval of Lead Based Paint Abatement Contract for house
at 322 Amity. COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the contract with Success Enterprise, LTD
5263 Apple Ave., Muskegon, Ml for the Lead-Based Paint Abatement at 322
Amity for $24,050.
The City of Muskegon obtained the structure at 322 Amity through the
foreclosure process.
After the lead-base paint abatement process is completed, the structure will
be totally rehabilitated and marketed to a qualified family for home
ownership.
FINACIAL IMPACT: Funding will be allocated from the 2000 HOME funds that
were budgeted for lead-based paint abatement.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the contract with Success Enterprise,
LTD for $24,050.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Land Reutilization Committee
approved the rehabilitation of the structure.
Motion by Commissioner Shepherd, second by Commissioner Spataro to
approve the contract with Success Enterprise, LTD for $24,050.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro,
Warmington
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
h. Approval of Contract for Final Phase of Jackson Hill Infill
projection Operation Rejuve-Nation A.K.A. Operation J-Hill.
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the contract with Bantam Group 1290
Wood of Muskegon for the completion of the final Infill project in the Jackson
Hill Neighborhood at a cost of $115,528.
The home will be built at 428 Marquette the site where until recently a
blighted structure stood. The City has demolished the previous blighted
structure and construction on the new home will start immediately if
approved by Commission.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for the construction of the structure has been
budgeted from 2001 HOME funding.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the contract with the Bantam Group
of Muskegon for the final phase of Operation Rejuve-Nation A.K.A. Operation
J-Hill at a cost of $115,528.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Land Reutilization Committee
approved the project.
Motion by Commissioner Shepherd, second by Commissioner Spataro to
approve the contract with the Bantam Group of Muskegon for the final phase
of Operation Rejuve-Nation A.K,A. Operation J-Hill at a cost of $115,528.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro,
Warmington, Buie
Nays: None
MOTION PASSES
2002-63 CLOSED SESSION:
Motion by Commissioner Schweifler, second by Vice Mayor Buie to close
session at 7:27pm to discuss property acquisition.
Motion by Commissioner Schweifler, second by Commissi.oner Spataro to
return to open session at 8:55pm.
ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Commission Meeting for the City of Muskegon
was adjourned at 8:56pm.
Respectfully submitted,
~-,L~
Gail Kundinger, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
RE: Annual Carriage License Renewal -
Muskegon Carriage Co.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the request to license two (2)
carriages for operation in the City of Muskegon for the 2002-2003
licensing year. The carriages will be inspected by the Police
Department prior to issuance of the license. The insurance coverage
has been approved by Risk Management.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval contingent upon inspection by
the Police Department.
)
APPLICATICN FOR TAXICAB OPEAATOR
in the
CITY CF MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN
Name o:f Company {d,b,a.) M.-,•;;;,=;.;;-c,01-i (AR,BlAe,e; CO
Address o:f O:ffice 557 ·w• CJ..A--('
Name & Residence of ) __.S"""'c.~01:C.1-<Si~·
a,;·t;;i'¼._,=:r;,"'-•zi<=·""1.___ _ _ _ _ Age '4 L/
each person interested ) ___________________ Age_ __
in or connected with the )
above, individual, :firm or) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Age_ __
corporation. )
___________________ Age_ __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Age_ __
Present Business o:f each person
connected with the above application. ~Oy.,~·=~=~a:..,:·=--------------
Give experience o:f applicant in taxicab
business in this City or elsewhere.
Number of cabs applicant proposes to use._ _ _ (2....,:l-=),._"t1:.;w=Q""-----------
Are there any Wlpaid or Wlbonded judgments
o:f record against the applicant
Have any of the persons connected with the above as individual, firm or
corporation been charged with or convicted of any crime or misdemeanor,
if so, state date and Court.
Name 0£ insurance company with which
applicant is insw:ed and amount of coverage. C/.?l}}tl.. lij;,(,t,AfJGf
Name of local agent or representative._·"t-=A~v\..,.._l~M,€At)w·==·-------------
Is the above applicant the sole owner of all the automobiles
proposed to be used? _ _ _ _ _ __,~c:.=--'----------------------
State liens, mortgages or other encumbrances including conditional sales
contracts on such taxicabs. --J:>11~~,-:.....----"-----------------
Attached hereto is a list o£ the automobiles with name of make, body-style,
year, serial and engine number, state license plate number, seating
capacity, weight of car which is considered a part of this application.
The applicant's annual financial and profit and loss statements covering
his operations dw:ing the last preceding fiscal year shall be attached to
this application.
Signature Sc,,;ck S~l Ys,.11~
Subscribed and sworn to before me a Notary Public in and for Muskegon
~
County, Michigan, this ____ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 19_ _ __
My commission expires
Notary Public
Application Approved
Chief of. Pol ice
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
RE: Fireworks Display - Muskegon Country Club
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Melrose Pyrotechnics, Inc. is requesting
approval of a fireworks display for July 4, 2002, at the Muskegon
Country Club. Fire Marshall Metcalf has reviewed the request and
recommends approval contingent on inspection of the fireworks. Risk
Management has approved the insurance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval contingent on inspection of the
fireworks.
PERMIT
2002-58(d)
FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY
Act 358, P.A. 1968
This permit is not transferable. Possession of this permit by the herein named person will
Authorize him to possess, transport and display fireworks in the amounts, for the purpose,
And at the place listed below only.
TYPE OF DISPIAY:
ISSUED TO,
Gl Public Display
• Agricultural Pest Control
NAME
Melrose Pyrotechnics, Inc. I Paul A. Kiste, Event Producer
ADDRESS I AGE:
P.O. Box 123, Belding, Michigan 48809
REPRESENTING,
NAME OF ORGANIZATION, GROUP, FIRM OR CORPORATION
Muskegon Country Club
ADDRESS
2801 Lakeshore Drive - Muskegon, Michigan
.
NUMBER & TYPES OF FIREWORKS,
Approximately 1,200 aerial display shells ranging in size from I 1/2 inches to 8 inches in diameter
DISPlAY,
EXACT LOCATION
2801 Lakeshore Drive
CITY, VILlAGE, TOWNSHIP DATE TIME
Muskegon July 4, 2002 Dusk
BOND OR INSURANCE FILE,
ISSUED BY, Britton-Gallagher & Associates
0 YES
• NO AMOUNT
$5,000,000.00
Issued by action of the ---"C"'i'""t'-'y--"C""o"'m""m"'i"'s"s'-'l"-''O c , n ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(,o""ci1, <0<1mmjnion, board)
of the ---~C~i~t,.,__________ of _ _~M~u~slik~e4 g.,olin~----------
(cit)', viUage, ,awruhipJ <~•mo of city, ,illago, township)
on the _ _~14~t=h~-------
APPLICATION
FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT
Act 36, P.A. 1976 I DATEOFAl'l'l.lCATION
ITPE OF DISPLAY
APPLICANT
Q Public Display
• Agricultural Pest Control
NAME or PERSON ADDRESS AGE: Must be 18 or over
Melrose Pyrotechnics, Inc. P.O. Box 302, Kingsbury, Indiana 46345
IF A CORPORATION: Name of President ADDRESS
Michael Cartolano P.O. Box 302, Kingsbury, Indiana 46345
3. P\'ROTECI-INIC OPERATOR
NAME OF PERSON ADDRESS AGE: Must be 18 or over
Paul Kiste P.O. Box 123, Beldine:, Michie:an 48809 37
EXPERIENCE:
NUMBER OF YEARS NUMBER OF DISPLAYS WHERE
18 years 500+ Michigan, Illinois, Indiana
NAM:E.S OF ASSISTANTS:
NA.t\1E ADDRESS AGE:
Michael Falke P.O. Box 123, Beldine:, Michigan 48809 29
NA.t\fE ADDRESS AGE:
Kevin Packard P.O. Box 123, Beldine:, Michigan 48809 21
4. NON-RESIDENT APPLICANT
NAME ADDRESS AGE:
Name of Michigan Attorney or Resident Agent ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER:
Paul A. Kiste P.O. Box 123, Belding, Michigan 48809 (800) 771-7976
5. EXACT LOCATION
Muskegon Country Club Grounds
DATE TIME
July 4, 2002 Dusk
6. NUMBER AND KINDS OF FIREWORKS TO BE DISPLAYED
Approximately 1,200 aerial display shells ranging in size from 1 l /2 inches to 8 inches in diameter
MANNER & PLACE 01: STORAGE PRIOR TO DISPLAY
No storage necessarv, delivered on date of display.
Subject to Approval of Local Fire Authorities
A. AM:OUNT OF BOND OR INSURANCE
to be set by municipality
7. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY $5,000,000.00
B. BONDING CORPORATION OR INSURANCECOMPANYNAfv!E
ADDRESS: 6240 SOM Center Road
Britton-Gallagher & Associates Cleveland, Ohio 44139
1. ~.£~!!§:;,, :J#g!lt'.t.ffi!EH!§''(@:g::!§ll§!!§~J[Yi'.1,J¥jigRfN;qj:::t t: ;·:·':: : ;: :;•·•·:· ·
PRODUCER
440-248-4711 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
0
04}16/0ZYI ]
Britton-Gallagher & Assoc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
6240 SOM Center Rd. ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Cleveland, OH 44139-2985 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
A Lexington Insurance Company
INSURED
COMPANY
Melrose Pyrotechnics, Inc. B
P.O. Box 302 COMPANY
Kingsbury, IN 46345 .c
COMPANY
. D
'
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
co TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
LIMITS
LTR DATE IMM/DDNY) DATE lMM/DD/VVJ
A ~NEftAL LIABILITY 0427470 4/01 /02 4/01/03 GENERAL AGGREGATE 2000000
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 2000000
":,::."-:. 1 CLAIMS MADE 0 OCCUR
PRODUCTS· COMP/OP AGG
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
' 1000000
OWNER'S &_CONTRACTOR'S PACT EACH OCCURRENCE 1000000
I--- - - - - - - - - - - FIRE DAMAGE {Any one fire)
• 50000
~TOMOBlLE LIABILITY
MED EXP {Any one person)
•
1-- ANY AUTO
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
•
- ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
BOOIL V INJURY
!Per person}
-
--
HIRED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
_ NON-OWNED AUTOS {Per accident)
- PROPERTY DAMAGE
~RAGE LIABILITY
---'- ANY AUTO
AUTO ONLY· EA ACCIDENT
OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY:
-<·:.,·-:,. :·-.;:c•:. ..
· • .... ,
EACH ACCIDENT
•
A EXCESS LIABILITY 5642250 4/01/02 4/01/03 EACH OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
• 4000000
xl' UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE 4000000
I OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
Lll6.fSY.J.!M
STAT.~:. I 10:r~- •....
' ·, .. · ,
.... .....,
EL EACH ACCIDENT
•
THE PROPRIETOR/
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS ARE:
OTHER
R INCL
EXCL
EL DISEASE· POLICY LIMIT
EL DISEASE· EA EMPLOYEE
•
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
DISPLAY DATE: July 4, 2002 LOCATION: Muskegon Country Club -Muskegon, MI ADDITIONAL INSURED: Muskegon
Country Club; Ciry of Muskegon, Michigan; Mr. Ron Whorton
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES ~CANCEL
E D BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING~OMNV Ill EAVOR TO MAIL
Muskegon Country Club
30 DAYS WfllTTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIF TE H LOE :.\MED TO THE LEFT,
ATfN: Mr. Ron Whorton BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL POS~ lf,Jo IGATION OR LIABILITY
2801 Lakeshore Drive OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY,h s J. N s OR REPRESENTATIVES,
Muskegon, Michigan 49441
00165 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
iA¢:Cii~ofi!s,~qiHil!/kt\ •·;,<; '
933 Terrace Street ·
MuskeQon, Ml 49440
OFFICE 231-724-6705
FAX 2~1-724-4178 __
c--,~ t;:.t
.!l --y O
f__._~
, At
.Jtw-1.
17,; -
~
WAe
C1erk'fs Offi~e
From:
Fax: Pages: -~
Phone: Date:
Re:. CC:
• Urgent • For Review • Please Comment • Please Reply • Please Recycle
0 -·
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
from: City Clerk Gail Kundinger
RE: Adoption of the Code of Ordinances
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt an Ordinance enacting a new
code for the City of Muskegon. This Code represents recodification of
our ordinances which had not been done for over twenty five years. It is
our intention to update this book on a regular basis as ordinances are
adopted by this City Commission.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:. To adopt the ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO . .2fil7
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND ENACTING A NEW CODE FOR THE
CITY OF MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN; PROV1DING FOR THE REPEAL OF
CERTAIN ORDINANCES NOT INCLUDED THEREIN; PROV1DING A
PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF; PROV1DING FOR THE
MANNER OF AMENDING SUCH CODE; AND PROV1DING WHEN SUCH
CODE AND THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON ORDAINS:
Section 1. The Code entitled "Code of Ordinances, City of Muskegon, Michigan," published by
Municipal Code Corporation, consisting of chapters 1 through 106, each inclusive, is adopted.
Section 2. All ordinances of a general and permanent nature enacted on or before December
11, 2001, and not included in the Code or recognized and continued in force by reference therein, are
repealed.
Section 3. The repeal provided for in section 2 hereof shall not be construed to revive any
ordinance or part thereof that has been repealed by a subsequent ordinance that is repealed by this
ordinance.
Section 4. Unless another penalty is expressly provided, every person convicted of a violation
of any provision of the Code or any ordinance, rule or regulation adopted or issued in pursuance thereof
shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $500.00 and costs of prosecution or by imprisonment for a
period of not more than 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each act of violation and each
day upon which any such violation shall occur shall constitute a separate offense. The penalty provided
by this section, unless another penalty is expressly provided, shall apply to the amendment of any Code
section, whether or not such penalty is reenacted in the amendatory ordinance. In addition to the
penalty prescribed above, the city may pursue other remedies such as abatement of nuisances, injunctive
relief and revocation of licenses or permits.
Section 5..Additions or amendments to the Code when passed in such form as to indicate the
intention of the city to make the same a part of the Code shall be deemed to be incorporated in the
Code, so that reference to the Code includes the additions and amendments.
Section 6. Ordinances adopted after December 11, 2001, that amend or refer to ordinances that
have been codified in the Code shall be construed as if they amend or refer to like provisions of the
Code.
Section 7. This ordinance shall become effective as provided by law.
This ordinance adopted:
Ayes: Buie , Gawron, Larson, Schweifler , Shepherd , Spataro, Warmington
Nays: None
Adoption Date: - -5=-~14=-=Q..,..2__
Effective Date: - ~6'--~1...-"""'0.,,,2_ _
First Reading: ___5'--~1~4_-~0=2-
Second Reading: -~N~A~---
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By Ji:LQ,½
Gail A. Kundinger
.j
City Cle_rk
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned, being the duly qualified clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County,
Michigan, does hereby certify that the foregoing is a trne and complete copy of an ordinance adopted
by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, at a regular meeting of the City Commission on the
14 tWay of ___,M. , .a,. ,.y___, 2002, which meeting was cpnducted and public notice was given pursuant
to and in full compliance with Act No. 267, Public Acts of Michigan of 1976, as amended.
Dated: May 14 ,2002
4w_Q~
Gail A. Kundinge;,ciic/
Clerk, City of Muskegon
Date: May14,2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
From: Community Relations Committee
RIE: Appointments to Various Committees/Boards
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To concur with the recommendations from the
Community Relations Committee regarding the following:
District Library Board - Appointment of Jill Montgomery to fill the vacancy that
will be open July 1, 2002 ..
DDNBrownfield -(1) Appointment of Linda Wood (2) Appointment of Margaret
Plichta (3) Reappointment of William Stone. Terms expire 1/31/2006.
Enterprise Community Citizens Council - Extend the terms of those already on the
council to the sunset date of 12/31/2003
Income Tax Board - Reappoint Mary Ann Riters to the board with term expiring
1/31/2005.
Leisure Services Board - Appointment of James Messick to fill the unexpired term
ending 1/31/2003
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve the recommendations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the recommendations from Community
Relations Committee.
r;; ~ J1ta,;kt?-J--U/
1~~41: cl~ }71,~I ~ Li YI~
lv"iAY l o 2u02
~~//11~
MUSKfGOll
7:3~7'- 0 3'/.3 CIT.Y MANAG,ill'S
Ol'f'IC!!
FLAG FLYING AT CITY HALL POLICY
A. Purpose
To provide a procedure to review and make a
determination on requests to fly flags at City Hall.
B. Review Process
1. Request
A request to fly at City Hall must be submitted
to the City Manager for review and a
determination. Group requesting must submit
the request at least two weeks prior to when
the flag would be raised. The following
considerations are to be given when reviewing a
request:
a) Appropriateness of the requesting
organization and flag.
b) When more than one request is received for
the same dates, the firs.t request received
will be given priority provided it meets
other criteria of the policy.
2. City Commission
Once a determination is made on a request, the
Manager will forward the same to the City
Commission at least one day prior to
notification to the requesting organization.
The requirement will be waived if the
requesting organization does not follow the
filing timeline and thereby rendering it
impossible to meet the deadline.
2. Appeals
Any organization may appeal the decision of the
City Manager to the City Commission. These
CITY OF MUSKEGON
FLAG PLACEMENT POLICY
2001-139(b)
A. Purpose
To provide a procedure to consider requests to the City to fly flags on City owned
or occupied property or facilities (herein "City property"). The flying of the
United States of America, State of Michigan, the County of Muskegon and the
City of Muskegon flags are exempt (except as set forth herein), from this policy
and can be flown on City property or at City property by authorized City
employees or officials.
B. City Control of Flag Placement.
Except as permitted by the City Commission or City staff members with
authority, no flag, including "exempt" flags shall be placed on City property by
any person except authorized city employees or officials. The procedures and
standards set forth in this policy document shall govern the City's decision to
permit or deny permission to have a particular flag flown or displayed on City
property.
The flying of flags on City property is peculiarly within the prerogatives of the
City. Flags which are permitted to be flown on City property have the effect of
representing to the community the City's support for the organization or point of
view which is represented by the flag. The City reserves the right to refuse or
terminate the flying of any flag for the reason that unintended endorsements by
the City shall not result from this policy. It is this concern, together with the
City's acknowledgement that the flying of flags is ii form of speech, which shall
guide the City in administering this policy.
C. Review Process. The Procedure.
1. Request
A request to fly a flag(s) must be submitted in writing to the City Clerk at
least 30 days prior to when the flag is proposed to be raised. The request
shall state in writing:
a .. All the reasons for the request.
b. Describe and display the flag, which shall not be changed in the
event permission is given.
G:\EDSI\FILES\00100\08501 l\RESOLUT\9V6160.DOC
c. State the name, address, and the names and addresses of all the
officers, of the organization submitting the request. Indicate the
legal form of organization, and the name and address of the contact
person who shall be responsible for the flag's condition and
presentation.
d. State the period for which the flag is requested to be flown.
e. The desired location. (Locations shall be determined by the
City based on availability and ability to display the flag without
infringing on the display by others, including the City itself).
2. City Staff Review
The City staff will review the request and make a recommendation to the
City Commission based on the following:
a. Appropriateness of the organization and the flag. Flags which
support illegal activities, take political positions or support
candidates for any office, advocate against City policies or involve
obscene language, symbols or activities are prohibited.
b. The number of other flags already approved.
c. The availability of!ocations.
d. The time period during which the flag shall be permitted to be
flown on City property. No permission shall be given for
permanent flag placement. In the event an applicant desires a
longer time period than that granted, renewal applications shall be
submitted at least 30 days before the end of the initial period in
order to afford the City Commission opportunity to decide on the
extension.
D. City Commission Consideration and Decision.
The City Commission will consider the request after the review and
recommendation from City staff. The City Commission will consider the
determination of City staff when making their decision as well as any
other criteria they deem appropriate, to the extent that the criteria are
legally and constitutionally supportable. In the event a request is denied by
the Commission, a decision with the reasons set forth shall be adopted at
the time of the refusal, and set forth in the minutes in writing as part of the
motion (or resolution) adopted.
G:\EDSI\F!LES\00100\085011 \RESOLUI\9V6160.DOC
E. Grant by City Commission; Location and Term
Any request that is approved will be accomplished by City Commission
resolution that will include the specific location(s) where the flag(s) can be flown
and the time period for which the request is granted.
Policy regarding term.of the permission: No permanent permission shall be
granted. The City's policy is to favor shorter term flying periods to accommodate
a reasonable number of requests and avoid unintended endorsements which can
arise not only by the message of the flag itself, but also by the duration a flag is
flown other than flags of the City, County, State and the United States.
Applicants are encouraged to apply for periods of display which are shorter, as
stated above. However, the Commission will consider periods up to one year for
flags which represent long term or continuing organizations, activities or public
(non-political) concerns. More typical will be permission granted for periods of a
week to thirty days.
The term of any permission granted shall be subject to the City's determination to
fly another flag in the location of and instead of the permitted flag in a time of
emergency or of critical public concern.
F. Flag Maintenance
It shall be the responsibility of the requesting organization to maintain the flag( s)
in good repair. Failure to do so will result in revocation of the permission to fly
the flag( s). The City shall afford access to the flag for repair and maintenance.
G. Revocation
The City Commission shall have the sole discretion to revoke the permission to
fly a flag permitted under this policy for whatever reasons they deem appropriate
and which are legally and constitutionally supportable. Claims made by any
person to whom permission has been granted concerning the import of the City's
permission to fly a flag which are not intended or acceptable to the City shall be,
without limitation, grounds for revocation without notice.
Any revocation of permission before the term permitted has expired shall be
accomplished by the City removing the flag and notifying the applicant to come
to the City's offices to retrieve the flag or flags removed. In such case the City
shall indicate by written memorandum delivered to the applicant the reason(s) for
revocation.
G:IEDSI\FILES\00100\085011 \RESOLU1\9V6 ! 60.DOC
2001-139(b)
CERTIFICATION
1bis policy was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Commission, held on November
27, 200 I. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act
of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Gail A. Kundinger, City Cler
Date: May 6, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
From: Public Facilities - Sanitation
Re: Refuse Cart Purchase 2002
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Authorization to purchase 504 refuse carts from Toter Incorporated.
This purchase would restock our inventory of replacement carts we keep
on hand for damaged carts. We are requesting approval for placing the
order now with delivery anticipated in July 2002. We currently have 110
carts in stock.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Unit cost per refuse cart $44.37 (504 per truckload)= 22,362.48
2002 Sanitation Department Budget allocated $50,000 for refuse carts
purchase, a second purchase will be made later in the year.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
This purchase to be charged to the 2002 sanitation budget.
Account# 101-60523-5700 (Capital outlay equipment)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the purchase
e
To: Robert Kuhn, DPW Director
From: Bob Fountain, Special Operations Supervisor
CC: Ted Russell, Sanitation Coordinator
Date: 05/14/02
Re< Toter Purchase - replacement garbage carts
Once again we need to purchase another supply of garbage carts. These are used as replacements for
damaged carts and for new customers who need them. Our original cart equipment was put into
service in 1991 and some of these carts are finally wearing out. We are getting good service out of
them, however, and have decided to continue with the Toter™ brand of carts that we have had for over
10 years.
We have investigated a number of brands of garbage carts over the years and have found that the
Toter™ equipment is by far the most durable. Therefore we are purchasing a truckload, 504 carts, from
Toter, Inc. as a sole source. Over the years this company, based in Charlotte, North Carolina, has held
their price to about $45.00 per cart. Last year the price was $44.37 per cart and they are holding to this
price today. The total cost for this order will be $22,362.48.
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Consideration of Bids
Southern Ave. Division to Seaway Dr.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The milling & resurfacing of Southern Ave. contract (H-1541) be awarded to Asphalt
Paving out of Muskegon since they were the lowest (see bid tabulation) responsible bidder
with a bid price of $80,585.28.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The construction cost of $80,585.28 plus associated engineering cost which is estimated at an
additional 15%.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Award the contract to Asphalt Paving.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
H-1541 SOUTHERN AVE.- DIVISION TO SEAWAY DR. REVISED 3/11/02
BID TABULATION
Aeril 30, 2002
CONTRACTOR NAME ASPHALT PAVING CO THOMPSON MCCULLY JACKSON-MERKEY FELCO CONTRACTORS
ADDRESS 1000 E. SHERMAN BLVD PO BOX 309 555 E. WESTERN 874 PULASKI
CITY, ST MUSKEGON, Ml COMSTOCK PARK, Ml MUSKEGON, Ml MUSKEGON, Ml
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
1 ADJUST CATCH BASIN CASTING 1 EACH $450.00 $450.00 $500.00 $500.00 $420.00 $420.00 $450.00 $450.00
2 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 11 EACH $425.00 $4,675.00 $450.00 $4,950.00 $480.00 $5,280.00 $425.00 $4,675.00
3 ADJUST WATER VALVE BOX 2 EACH $420.00 $840.00 $250.00 $500.00 $375.00 $750.00 $420.00 $840.00
4 BIT LEVELING MIX 3C@ 165#/ SYD 450 TON $51.21 $23,044.50 $51.73 $23,278.50 $56.20 $25,290.00 $54.00 $24,300.00
5 BIT TOP MIX 4C MOD POLYMER ASHALT@ 165#/ SYD 450 TON $53.61 $24,124.50 $54.08 $24,336.00 $58.65 $26,392.50 $58.00 $26,100.00
6 COLD MILLING BITUMINOUS SURFACE, 3" 5152 SYD $1.94 $9,994.88 $1.75 $9,016.00 $1.90 $9,788.80 $2.65 $13,652.80
7 CATCH BASIN CASTIN E.J. 5105 OR EQUAL 1 EACH $490.00 $490.00 $500.00 $500.00 $595.00 $595.00 $490.00 $490.00
8 CONCRETE CURB, 6" X 14" 50 L FT $12.50 $625.00 $15.00 $750.00 $14.30 $715.00 $29.00 $1,450.00
9 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, F-4 MODIFIED 4 L FT $25.00 $100.00 $50.00 $200.00 $27.50 $110.00 $65.00 $260.00
10 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 4M 550 S FT $2.50 $1,375.00 $2.60 $1,430.00 $2.80 $1,540.00 $3.90 $2,145.00
11 MANHOLE CASTING E.J. # 1000 OR EQUAL 5 EACH $505.00 $2,525.00 $525.00 $2,625.00 $590.00 $2,950.00 $505.00 $2,525.00
12 PAVEMENT PREPARATION 14.54 STA $300.00 $4,362.00 $285.00 $4,143.90 $290.00 $4,216.60 $325.00 $4,725.50
13 PAVT MRKG, TYPER. 4", YELLOW.TEMP 60 L FT $3.00 $180.00 $3.00 $180.00 $1.15 $69.00 $4.90 $294.00
14 PAVT MRKG, WATERBORNE.4",YELLOW 375 L FT $1.50 $562.50 $1.00 $375.00 $1.50 $562.50 $4.80 $1,800.00
15 RECONSTRUCTING MANHOLES 2 VFT $135.00 $270.00 $550.00 $1,100.00 $510.00 $1,020.00 $135.00 $270.00
16 REMOVING CONCRETE CURB 50 L FT $9.35 $467.50 $10.00 $500.00 $16.00 $800.00 $9.35 $467.50
17 REMOVING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 4 L FT $12.35 $49.40 $10.00 $40.00 $20.00 $80.00 $12.35 $49.40
18 REMOVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 400 S FT $2.80 $1,120.00 $6.00 $2,400.00 $1.70 $680.00 $2.80 $1,120.00
19 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP $4,150.00 $4,150.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,975.00 $6,975.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
20 WATER VALVE BOX, COMPLETE 2 EACH $590.00 $1,180.00 $450.00 $900.00 $490.00 $980.00 $590.00 $1,180.00
TOTAL $80,585.28 $81,724.40 $89,214.40 $91,794.20
4J30J02 3:11 PM Southern Bid Tabulation.xis Sheet1
H-1541 SOUTHERN AVE.- DIVISION TO SEAWAY DR. REVISED 3/11/02
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRIG TOTAL PRICE
1 ADJUST CATCH BASIN CASTING EACH $400.00 $400.00
2 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 11 EACH $400.00 $4,400.00
3 ADJUST WATER VALVE BOX 2 EACH $300.00 $600.00
4 BIT LEVELING MIX 3C@ 165#/ SYD 450 TON $32.00 $14,400.00
5 BIT TOP MIX 4C MOD POLYMER ASHALT@ 165#/ SYD 450 TON $38.00 $17,100.00
6 COLD MILLING BITUMINOUS SURFACE, 3" 5152 SYD $3.00 $15,456.00
7 CATCH BASIN CASTIN E.J. 5105 OR EQUAL 1 EACH $400.00 $400.00
8 CONCRETE CURB, 6" X 14" 50 L FT $15.00 $750.00
9 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, F-4 MODIFIED 4 L FT $20.00 $80.00
10 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 4" 550 S FT $3.00 $1,650.00
11 MANHOLE CASTING E.J. # 1000 OR EQUAL 5 EACH $400.00 $2,000.00
12 PAVEMENT PREPARATION 14.54 STA $200.00 $2,908.00
13 PAVT MRKG, TYPE R, 4", YELLOW,TEMP 60 L FT $4.00 $240.00
14 PAVT MRKG, WATERBORNE,4",YELLOW 375 L FT $1.00 $375.00
15 RECONSTRUCTING MANHOLES 2 VFT $350.00 $700.00
16 REMOVING CONCRETE CURB 50 LFT $12.00 $600.00
17 REMOVING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 4 LFT $12.00 $48.00
18 REMOVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 400 S FT $2.00 $800.00
19 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP $5,000.00 $5,000.00
20 WATER VALVE BOX, COMPLETE 2 EACH $350.00 $700.00
SUB-TOTAL $68,607.00
15% ENGINEERING $10,291.05
TOTAL $78,898.05
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Consideration of Bids
Harvey St.., Keating to South End
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The construction of Harvey St. (including sanitary sewer) contract (H-1545 & S-568) be
awarded to Jackson Merkey contractors out of Muskegon since they were the lowest (see
bid tabulation) responsible bidder with a bid price of $170,939.80.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The construction cost of $170,939.80 plus associated engineering cost which is estimated at
an additional 15%.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Award the contract to Jackson Merkey Contractors.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
H-1545 & S-568 HARVEY ST. 1700' SOUTH OF KEATING TO KEATING
BID PROPOSAL
May 7, 2002
CONTRACTOR JACKSON.MERKEY FELCO DIVERSIFIED LAKESIDE WADEL
ADDRESS 555 E WESTERN AVE 874 PULASKI AVE 6775 HARVEY 13840172NDAVE 2500 OCEANA DR
CITY/ST MUSKEGON, Ml MUSKEGON, Ml SPRING LAKE, Ml GRAND HAVEN, Ml HART, Ml
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE OTAL PRIC UNIT PRICE OTAL PRIC
1 ADJUST CATCH BASIN CASTING 3 EACH $435.00 $1,305.00 $400.00 $1,200.00 $333.00 $999.00 $350.00 $1,050.00 $400.00 $1,200.00
2 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 1 EACH $475.00 $475,00 $400.00 $400.00 $300.00 $300.00 $350.00 $350.00 $400.00 S400.00
3 ADJUST WATER VALVE CASTING 1 EACH $430,00 $430.00 $280.00 $280.00 $400.00 $400.00 $350.00 $350.00 $200.00 $200,00
4 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 22A 15 TON $24.00 $360.00 $36.00 $540.00 $25.00 $375.00 $15.00 $225.00 $16.00 $240.00
5 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE22A@8" C.1.P. 196D SQ.YD $5.10 $9,996.00 $7.15 $14,014.00 $8.00 $15,680.00 $7.00 S13,720.00 $5.55 $10,878.00
6 AGGREGATE BASE WIDENING 22A@8" C.I.P. eoo SQ.YD $7.60 $4,560.00 $7.40 $4,440.00 $8.50 $5,100.00 $8.00 $4,800.00 $15.00 $9,000.00
7 BENDS D.C.I. 8" 22112° M.J. 1 EACH $250.00 $250.00 $180.00 $180.00 $300.00 $300.00 $225.00 $225.00 S250.00 $250.00
8 BIT. WIDENING MIX JC @22D#IS.Y. 62 TON $62.00 $3,844.00 S66.00 $4,092.00 $71.00 S4.402.00 S62.00 $3,844.00 $62.00 $3,844.00
a BIT. LEVELING MIX JC@ 165#/S.Y. 206 TON S38.45 $7,920.70 $39.60 $8,157.60 $44.00 S9,064.00 S40.00 $8,240.00 $38.45 $7,920.70
1D BIT. TOP MIX4C ~ 165#/S.Y. TON S39.65 $17,723.55 $40.95 $18,304.65 $49.00 $21,903.00 $40.00 $17,880.00
11 CAPD.C.l.8"M.J.W/2"TAP
'"
1 EACH $120.00 $120.00 $150.00 $150.00 $500.00 $500.00 $200.00 $200.00
$39.65 $17,723.55
S300.00 $300.00
12 CATCH BASIN CASTING E.J.#5105 OR EQUAL 3 EACH $495.00 $1,485.00 $470.00 $1,410.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 S750.00 $2,250.00
13 CONC. CURB & GUTTER F-4 MOD. so LIN. FT $19.00 $570.00 S38.00 $1,140.00 $40.00 $1,200.00 $25.00 $750.00 $50.00 $1,500.00
$34.00 $816.00 S35.00 $840.00 $40.00 S960.00 $40.00
14 CONC. SPILLWAY 6" PER DETAIL
15 EXCAVATION
"
658
SQ.YD.
CU.YD. $13.90 $9,146.20 $6.15 $4,046.70 S10.00 $6,580.00 $15.00
$960.00
$9.870.00
$35.00
$12.00
$840.00
$7,896.00
16 LOWERING EXISTING 2" COPPER WATER SERVIC 1 EACH $210.00 $210.00 $380.00 $380.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $375.00 $375.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
17 MANHOLE CASTING E.J,#1000 OR EQUAL 6 EACH $545.00 $3,270.00 $410.00 $2,460.00 $500.00 S3,000.00 $400.00 $2,400.00 $600.00 $3,600.00
18 MANHOLE STD. 4' I.D. 0' TO 10' DEEP 6 EACH $1,635.00 $9,810.00 $1,950.00 $11,700.00 $2.000.00 $12,000.00 S1 ,500.00 $9,000.00 $2.000.00 $12,000.00
19 PAVEMENT PREPARATORY WORK 8.28 STA. $275.00 $2.2TT.OO $350.00 $2,898.00 $300.00 $2,484.00 $500.00 $4,140.00 $250.00 $2.070.00
20 PIPE INSULATION PER DETAIL 380 LIN.FT. $4.00 $1,520.00 $2.09 $794.20 $4.00 $1,520.00 $5.00 $1,900.00 $3.50 $1,330.00
21 RELOCATE HYDRANT 1 EACH $675.00 $675.00 $1,050.00 $1,050.00 $1.800.00 $1,800.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
22 REMOVING CONC. CURS & GUTTER 88 LIN.FT. $5.00 $440.00 $4.90 $431.20 $10.00 S880.00 $7.00 $616.00 $6.00 $528.00
23 REMOVING TREES B"TO 12" 1 EACH $150.00 $150.00 $600.00 $600.00 $500.00 $500.00 $225.00 $225.00 $450.00 $450.00
24 SANITARY SEWER SERVICES" C700 ES VIT. W / PLUG 35 LIN. FT $32.00 $1,120.00 S29.00 $1,015.00 $40.00 $1,400.00 $25.00 $875.00 $26.00 $910.00
25 SANTITARY SEWER 12" D.C.I. CL.52 58 LIN. FT $62.00 $3,596.00 $38.00 $2,204.00 $175.00 $10,150.00 $55.00 S3,190.00 $40.00 $2,320.00
26 SANTITARYSEWER 12"C700ESVIT. 1467 LIN. FT $35,75 $52.445.25 S36.00 $52,812.00 $35.00 S51.345.00 $50.00 $73,350.00 $38.00 $55,746.00
27 TERRACE GRADING 1750 LIN. FT $8.15 $14,262.50 $8.05 $14,087.50 $8.00 $14,000.00 $9.00 $15,750.00 $15.00 $26,250.00
28 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP $3,975.00 $3,975.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5.000.00
$3.60 $3,099.60 $3.10 $2,669.10 $5,00 $4,305.00 $5.00 $4,305.00 $4.75 $4,089.75
29 TRENCH REPAIR LAWN REHAB
'"
,ao
LIN.FT.
$8.50 $4,165.00 $10.15 $4,973.50 $8.00 $3,920.00
30 TRENCH REPAIR LOCAL STREET TYPE V LIN.FT. $15.00 $7,350.00 $22.00 $10,780.00
31 TRENCH ER PAIR MAJOR STREET TYPE Ill 188 LIN. FT $47.00 $8,883.00 $74.00 $13,986.00 $13.50 $2,551.50 $40.00 $7,560.00 $36.00 $6,804.00
32 WATERMAIN 8" D.C.I. CL. 52 30 LIN. FT $38.00 $1,140.00 $29.00 $870.00 $45.00 $1,350.00 $25.00 $750.00 $50,00 $1,500.00
33 WATER VALVE BOX & COVER COMPLETE 2 EACH $450.00 $900.00 $450.00 $900.00 $400.00 $800.00 $200,00 $400.00 $1.500.00 $3,000.00
HARVEY TOTAL 170,939.80 177,025.45 189,518.50 202.150.00 204,320.00
,o
"
H-1545 & S-568 HARVEY ST. 1700' SOUTH OF KEATING TO KEATING
STREET & SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE APRIL 09, 2002
DESCRIPTION icil.JANTITY[ UNIT PRICE PRICE
1 ADJUST CATCH BASIN CASTING ----- 3i EACH $300_00 $900.00
2 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 1 l $350.00 $350.00
3 ;ADJLJSTWATER VA~_\l_(::__<;:/l.~TING $300.00 $30000
····················1·. !
4 ;AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 22A 15 TON $20_00 $300.00
5 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 22A@ 8" C.I.P. 1960 SQ.YD. $6_00 $11,76.ooo.. _
6 AGGREGATE BASE WIDENING 22A@8" C.I.P. 600 SQ.YD. $12.00 $7,200.00
7 BENDS D.C.I. 8" 22 1/2° M.J. 1 EACH $200.00 . $20000
8 BIT. WIDENING MIX 3C@ 220#/S.Y. 62! TON $50.00 $3,100.00
9 BIT. LEVELING MIX 3C@ 165#/S.Y. 206 TON $35_00 $7,21000
10 'BIT. TOPMIX4C@165#/S.Y. 447 TON $40.00 $17,BBIJOIJ_
11 CAP D.C.I. 8" M.J. W / 2" TAP 1 EACH -- J20.000 . $20000
12 CATCH BASIN CASTING E.J.#5105 OR EQUAL 3• EACH $550.00 $1,650_00
13 CONG. CURB & GUTTER F-4 MOD. 30i LIN. FT. $15.00 $450_00
14 CONG. SPILLWAY 6" PER DETAIL 24! SQ.YD. $30.00 $720.00
15 EXCAVATION 658! CU.YD. $10.00 _$6,58000
16 LOWERING EXISTING 2" COPPER WATER SERVICE 1! EACH $450_00 $450_00
17 MANHOLE CASTING E.J.#1000 OR EQUAL 6 EACH $500_00 $3,000_00
18 MANHOLE STD. 4' 1.D. 0' TO 10' DEEP 6 EACH $1,500.00 $9,0IJO.OO
19 PAVEMENT PREPARATORY WORK 8.28 STA. - -- - ~25.000 $2,01000
20 PIPE INSULATION PER DETAIL 380 LIN. FT. $1.50 $570.00
21 RELOCATE HYDRANT EACH $1,50000 $1,50000
22 REMOVING CONG. CURB & GUTTER BB! LIN.FT. $8.00 $704.00
23 REMOVING TREES 8" TO 12" EACH $200 00 $200 00
24 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 8" C700 ES VIT. W / PLUGS 35 LIN. FT. $30_00 $1,050.00
25 SANTITARY SEWER 12" o.c.r. Cl.52 58 LIN. FT. $50.00 _$2,900 00
26 SANTITARY SEWER 12" C700 ES VJT. 1467 LIN. FT. $45.00 -~66,01500
27 TERRACE GRADING 1750[ LIN. FT. $8.00 $14,000.00
28 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP $10,000.00 $10,000_00
29 TRENCH REPAIR LAWN REHAB 861 LIN.FT. $10.00 $8,610,00
30 TRENCH REPAIR LOCAL STREET TYPE V 490 LIN.FT. $20.00 $9,800.00
31 TRENCH ERPAIR MAJOR STREET TYPE Ill 189 LIN. FT. $55.00 $10,395,00
32 WATERMAIN 8" D.C.I. CL 52 30! LIN. FT. $30.00 $900.00
33 WATER VALVE BOX & COVER COMPLETE
------····
EACH $350 00 . $7000_()
SUBTOTAL $2_00,664.00
15% ENGINEERING $30,099.60
TOTAL! $230,76360
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Consideration of Bids
Ridge Ave. Cumberland to Glenside
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The resurfacing of Ridge Ave. contract (H-1554) be awarded to Felco Contractors out of
Muskegon since they were the lowest (see bid tabulation) responsible bidder with a bid
price of $66,034.95
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The construction cost of $66,034.95 plus associated engineering cost which is estimated at an
additional 15%.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Award the contract to Felco Contractors.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
H-1554 RIDGE AVE. CUMBERLAND TO GLENSIDE
BID TABULATION
May 1, 2002
Contractor LAKESIDE CONSTRUCTION FELCO CONTRACTORS JACKSON-MERKEY WADEL STABILIZATION DIVERSIFIED I
Address 13840 172nd AVENUE 874 PULASKI AVE 555 E. WESTERN 2500 OCEANA DR 6775 HARVEY
City/St GRAND HAVEN, Ml MUSKEGON, Ml MUSKEGON, Ml HART, Ml SPRING LAKE, Ml I
-· ·" _... ' ~ "
DESCRIPTION UANTI UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE OTALPRIC PRICE TOTAL PRIC PRICE TOTAL PRICE PRICE OTAL PRlC
1 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 2 EACH $400.00 $800.00 $475.00 $950.00 $490.00 S980.00 $400.00 $800.00 $250.00 $500.00
2 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 22A@ 6" C.1.P. 209 SQ.YD $10.00 $2,090.00 $6.95 $1,452.55 $9.35 $1,954.15 $12.00 $2,508.00 $7.50 $1,567.50
3 BIT LEVELING MIX 3C@ 220#/S.Y. 190 TON $42.00 $7.980.00 $43.15 $8,198.50 $45.00 $8,550.00 $41.10 $7,809.00 $51.00 $9,690.00
4 BIT. TOP MIX 4C@ 165#/S.Y. 145 TON $50.00 $7,250.00 $52,00 $7,540.00 $53.20 $7,714.00 $48.36 $7,012.20 $55.00 $7,975.00
5 CATCH BASIN CASTING E.J.#7065 W/M I GRATE ORE 1 EACH $500.00 $500.00 $625.00 $625.00 $585.00 $585.00 $600.00 $600.00 $500.00 $500.00
6 CATCH BASIN STD. 1 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,470.00 $1,470.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
7 CONC. BASE COURSE 6" 146 SQ.YD $29.00 $4,234.00 $22.50 $3,285.00 $30.00 $4,380.00 $31.00 $4,526.00 $27.00 $3,942.00
8 CONC. CURB & GUTTER STD. DETAIL #3 1381 LIN.FT $8.50 $11,738.50 $8.40 $11,600.40 $9.45 $13,050.45 $10.00 $13,810.00 $14.00 $19,334.00
9 CONC. DRIVE APPROACH 6" 158 SQ.YD $32.00 $5,056.00 $26.05 $4,115.90 $30.80 $4,866.40 $35.00 $5,530.00 $27.00 $4,266.00
10 EXCAVATION 100 CU.YD $25.00 $2,500.00 $13.50 $1,350.00 $17.50 $1,750.00 $30.00 $3,000.00 $10.00 $1,000.00
11 MANHOLE CASTING E.J.#1000 OR EQUAL 1 EACH $350,00 $350.00 $425.00 $425.00 $590.00 $590.00 $600.00 $600.00 $400.00 $400.00
12 MEMBRANE REINFORCEMENT 1625 SQ.YD $2.00 $3,250.00 $2.70 $4,387.50 S2.20 $3,575.00 $2.00 $3,250.00 $2.25 $3,656.25
13 PAVEMENT PREPARATORY WORK 6.38 STA. $1,000.00 $6,380.00 $390.00 $2,488.20 $330.00 $2,105.40 $300.00 $1,914.00 $350,00 $2,233.00
14 REMOVING CONC. DRIVE APPROACH 252 SQ.YD $10.00 $2,520.00 $9.80 $2,469.60 $9,75 $2,457.00 $6.00 $1,512.00 $8.00 $2,016.00
15 REMOVING PAVEMENT 219 SQ.YD $10.00 $2,190.00 $9.80 $2,146.20 $6,90 $1,511.10 $8.00 $1,752.00 $6.00 $1,314.00
16 STORM SEWER 10" SOR 35 PVC 45 !N. FT $50.00 $2,250.00 $32.00 $1,440.00 $24.50 $1,102.50 $55.00 $2,475.00 $28.00 $1,260.00
17 TERRACE GRADING 691 !N. FT $10.00 $6,910.00 $12.10 $8,361.10 $9.90 $6,840.90 $10.00 $6,910.00 $8.00 $5,528.00
18 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,475.00 $8,475.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $750,00 $750.00
RIDGE TOTAL $69,498.50 $66,034.95 $71,956.90 $68,008.20 $66,931.75
H-1554 RIDGE AVE. CUMBERLAND TO GLENSIDE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATEMARCH22,2002
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY; UNIT PRICE PRICE
ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 2i EACH $350.00 Eoo,oo
2 !AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 22A@ 6" C.I.P. 209i SQ.YD. $6.00 $1,254.00
3 /BIT. LEVELING MIX 3C@ 220#/S.Y. 190! TON $35.00 ~6,650,00
4 !BIT. TOP MIX 4C@ 165#/S.Y. 145: TON $40.00 $5,80()00j
5 iCATCH BASIN CASTING E.J.#7065 W/M I GRATE OR EQUAL 1: EACH $550.00 $550.00 i
6 CATCH BASIN STD. f EACH $1,400.00 $1,400.00
7 ·coNC. BASE COURSE 6" 146' SQ.YD. $25.00 $3,650.00
8 CONG. CURB & GUTTER STD. DETAIL #3 1381 LIN.FT. $10.00 $13,810.00
9 CONG. DRIVE APPROACH 6" 158 SQ.YD. $25.00 $3,950,()()j
10 EXCAVATION 100 CU.YD. $10.00 $1,00()000 /
11 MANHOLE CASTING E.J.#1000 OR EQUAL 1 EACH $500.00 $500,00
12 MEMBRANE REINFORCEMENT 1625! SQ.YD. $2.00 $3,250.00_
13 PAVEMENT PREPARATORY WORK 6.38 STA. $250.00 $1,595.00
14 REMOVING CONG. DRIVE APPROACH 252' SQ.YD. $10.00 $2,520,00
15 REMOVING PAVEMENT 219 SQ.YD. $10.00 $2,1~().()0/
16 STORM SEWER 1O" SDR 35 PVC 45 LIN. FT. $30.00 $1,350.00
17
18
TERRACE GRADING
TRAFFIC CONTROL
691
1
LIN. FT.
LUMP
r
I
$10.00
$5,00000
$6,910.00
$5,000.00
- --·-- -·--·
SUBTOTAL $62,079.ClO
15% ENGINEERING $9,311.85
TOTAL! $71,390.85
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
from: Engineering
RE: Request for Encroachment Agreement
Olfthoff, Black Creek to Sheridan
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Reid Tool Supply Company has submitted has submitted the attached encroachment
agreement form requesting your permission to install conduit and fiber optic cable in north
side of Olthoffs R-O-W between Sheridan & Black Creek Rd. (see attached map).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the encroachment agreement with the supplemental conditions.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
-- ~~Mnl'IC:n NUM\.,;t\U::::l!:::i is. .JUUU- i l""age 1
Feb-04-02 04:44P P.Ol.
2002-58(m)
CITY OF MUSKEGON
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AND PERMIT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 14th day of_...,Ma""'y'--_ _ 20__ig_, by
and between the CITY OF MUSKEGON, a municipal corporation (hereinafter called CITY), and
_,,RE......,I,.,Dc......T_,.O,,.,O""L'---"'S"'U'='P'='P-"'L""-Y...,,.C,..OeMP'"'A"'N"'-Y-=------- (hereinafter called LICENSEE).
RECITALS
1. LICENSEE pf()poses to install, repair or maintain improvements or facilities ("the
encroachment"), in or abutting a street, alley, sidewalk, park, terrace or other property controlled or
owned by the City of Muskegon, the encroachment being described as
laying a fiber optic cable
2. The City-owned or controlled property (herein "property") subject to the encroachment is
described as:
(please insert a general description, and if required by the city, an accurate legal description]
City owned utility easement running along the north side of
Olthoff Drive
3. The City is willing to grant such privilege upon the terms and conditions herein. This
agreement shall constitute a permit under section 18-19 of the Code of Ordinances, but shall apply to
any encroachment on public ways or property.
THEREFORE,
I. City does hereby grant unto LICENSEE the privilege of_constructing, _X~-
installing, ...2L..maintaining, _ _:Xe:...._ repairing _ _ performing all necessary functions relating to the
encroachment, and for that purpose to enter the property, for the term hereing stated. This
Post-It" Fax Note 7671 Outs
To From
t.:o. I
Pllaflt~ ti Phon• N
Fax• r,..,
Feb-p4-02
,·
04:44P P . 02
privilege shall be effective upon the issuance of an encroachment permit, which shall be issued only
after approval of this agreement by the City Commission and delivery to the City of the required
evidence of insurance coverages.
This grant is subject to the following special conditions: S<-<- .:lv..f r KMe,,, ha {
2. That LICENSEE shall pay to the City for the privilege hereby granted the sum of ....,
---~----2._....S:_____ Do11ars ($ ;ff' J, n. such payment to be made upon the
signing of this agreement to be dated as of the ...J.ilhday of _ _"'"'M=a.....
v_ _ _ _ 20_Q2_, to the City
Treasurer ofthc City of Muskegon, and the privilege hereby granted shall continue for a period to
~OcJ7 ~
terminate the first day of May, 2022. unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided.
3. INDEMNIFICATION. The LICENSEE shall indemnify and save harmless said GRANTOR
of and from any liability for claims, damages, costs, expenses, or fees, including any attt;,mey fees, or
fines or awards brought against or charged to the city by any person, finn or corporation on account of
or arising from the privilege hereby granted to LICENSF.F. or the activities of Lhe LICENSEE related
to.the encroachment or this privilege. This indemnification obligation shall include all liabilities for
environmental damage or releases of hazardous substances subject to any governmental or third party
action. "Hazardous substance" is defined a.-. any material constituting a prohibited or regulated
substance under·governmental law, rule, statute or regulation in force at any time. including future
times.
4. INSURANCE. LICENSEE shall at all times carry liability insurance in such amounts as arc
satisfactory to City, and issued by companies acceptable to the City, licensed in the State of Michigan,
naming City as an additional insured on any such policy. LICENSEE will me with
2
Received: 2/ 4/02 4:19PM; -> WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD-; Page 3
Peb-04-02 04:44P PC03
City certificates or policies evidencing such insurance coverage. The insurance policies or certificates
shall provide that the City shall be given thirty days written notice before a cancellation or change in
coverage may occur. The types of coverage and coverage limits to be required shall be as follows:
S. BONDING. Before tbis agreement/permit becomes valid, LICENSEE shall file with the.
city a bond conforming with the requirements of any ordinance, and shall keep same in force during
the entire term of this agreement.
6. The privilege hereby granted may be canceled and revoked by the CITY at any time
upon giving said LICENSEElify~Yof~?Jen notice of such cancellation and revocation.
7. LICENSEE may surrender up the privilege hereby granted at any time upon giving
notice in writing to tbe city _..,l.,,Oe-_ days prior to such surrender; provided, however, that upon the
voluntary relinquishment or abandonment of this privilege, or upon cancellation or revocation thereof
by the City, the LICENSEE shall remove any structure(s) erected upon, within or overhanging the area
of encroachment and restore the property at I ,TCENSEE'S expense and in a manner satisfactory to City
and in default thereof shall be liable to City for any cost, damage or expense the City may sustain in
such restoration.
8. That should said LICENSEE fail or refuse to conform to any of the conditions on its
part to be performed hereunder, the privilege hereby granted shall immediately terminate and become
null and void.
3
Received: :2 / 4 / 0:2 4 : 1 QPM; -> WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD-; Page 4
FoG!b-0"4-02 04: 44P P.04
9. This agreement shal be binding upon the respective heirs, representatives, successors
and assigns of the parties hereto.
Witnesses: CITY OF MUS
L. / nJq / or-t-tr
And ~ L ~jN
Gw'/ /fu/ldtg;eer , Clerk
LICENSEE:
REID TOOL SUPPLY COMPANY
4
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS
1- The grantee shall be fully responsible for the maintenance of the cables/conduits
and any removal or relocation that becomes necessary to facilitate other public
improvements within the right of way.
2- Grantee will be responsible to maintenance and upkeep, for the duration of this
agreement, a valid insurance coverage satisfactory to the City.
3- If approved (by City Commission), a permit to work in the right of way must be
obtained from the Engineering Department before any work begins.
4- It shall be the responsibility of the owner ensure that these facilities are a part of the
miss dig system at all times.
• FIBER SERVICES, INC.
May 3, 2002
Attention: City Commission
933 Terrace
PO Box536
Muskegon,MI 49443
Dear Commissioners;
On behalf of Reed Tool Company I.S. Fiber Services will act as the construction
company who will be installing an innerduct/conduit with copper and fiber optic cable
facilities for voice and data communication purposes.
The facilities will be buried at a minimum of 36" in depth. They will be bored
underground via directional bore method. This method is suitable for this type of
installation and will result in the very least restoration of existing grass and soil. The
facilities will be buried in the utility easement some 14.5' to 24.5' from the curb of
Olthoff Rd. The exact location is to be determined and provided on an as-built or cad
drawing.
The facilities will be placed off of Olthoff Rd. between Black Creek and Sheridan. The
buildings being connected are located at 2226 Olthoff and 2400 Olthoff.
All City, County, State, Osha, and MDOT standards will be adhered to for this type of
installation.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at 616-218-9190.
Sincerely, f)
~D- ~ti
Tim Onstott
l.S. Fiber Services
881 Sand Lake Drive• Zeeland, MI 49464 • (616) 748-1595
May 6, 2002
City of Muskegon
933 Terrace St
Muskegon, MI 49442
To Whom It May Concern:
Reid Tool Supply Company (Reid) has contracted with Wiseman Enterprises, Inc.
(Wiseman) to install fiber optic and copper cable. The cables are to be installed between
2246 Olthoff Dr. and 2400 Olthoff Dr.
Reid will assume full responsibility and ownership for the installed cables upon
completion of the contract with Wiseman and will carry the necessary property damage
and liability insurance.
If you should have any further question please feel free to contract me at 767-3704 or
rgoodwin@reidtool.com.
s:::,/$.YJ-
ihard W. Goodwin
Chief Financial Officer
2265 Black Creek Road• Muskegon, Michigan 49444-2684
Phones: 800-253-0421 • 231-777-3951 • FAX: 800-438-1145 • 231-773-4485
Web Site: www.reidtool.com • E-Mail: mail@reidtool.com
FROM :JS FIBER SERVICES FAX NO, :616-748-1595 May, 05 2002 08:47AM P2
·~··
•
...
<Q ... ' "2:
_
:l"'...
t1
• ~
....,"\i-
.;:
-~
a
... -
·oc :a
~.,J
,..,_ I • f ~
,A
I I
b
L_ . . ~j
o"'
o"'- I
I 1
.
., ._._
-------·--
... ·-----·-' - . ·-............ -.../'" .... _ <l
I
...r-0 \
\ '· o·
\. ·,,.~ "--:;i,.
,j
\ '·
~ ...............~... -----· ,_,,_,__________ ; ,.._ ______ ~
□~~ ::i- ... -
0.._ l
. . , : ;:i
I I
"'~ ::i
2
· - - - - · ..... _ f .. -- ---.__r··-.... <I ~ I I
I l
I
I
I
I
(:)
--
I
l:::l
C]
--'o r>
"'"'
z"
I,
~·
N
!'i.
I 1S'
~
j·
....
-.i::
1-:> 'a
-=<
~
9.'
""
~
..,
! ·/
f
\
"'> '
---- -
\;'<':-~
\
~
l
-=i
~ >
• IL
! - ,
,.. ;:!-
~ ; ~
•
"'1
l::
~
~
FAX NO. 616 3239794 p, 02
MAY-01-2002 WED 04:28 PM BURNHAM INSURANCE
DATe (MM/Dll/YY)
ACORD_ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSU ~NC~I8;!~ c~ 05/01/02
PROl>UCIII THIS CERTIFICATE I ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFER NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
- Burnham Insurance Group HOLDER, THIS CER" FICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTENO OR
PO Bex 790 ALTER THE COVEAJ ~E AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Portage MI 49081
INSI RERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
Phone:616-323-1900 Fax:616-323-9794
1NsURERA: Weatpo ·t Insurance Corp.
Reid Tool S~pply COIJIPany INSUAI!••: I.eaion Indamnitv ColD!)any
Induaqia~ Supply
lti§
RTS
GoodJu.n
226 BlacJt CrHI< Rd
1Nsu... c:
tNSUReR D:
Chubb I rouc 0£ Ina C'--'o~mpa~~n=ciccec.s~----
Mus egon MI 49444
I INSURERE!\
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BESN 1ssueo TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD NDICA.TEO. NOTWfTHSTANOING
AAY REQUU\EMENT, TERM OR CONDmON OF M('( CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHtci't THIS CERTll lCAtE MAY SE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, Ttte INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DUCRIBfD HEREIN JS SUBJECT to ~s
ALL THE 'l"ERMS, EXCLUSIO AND CONOITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE L.IMtlS SHO\NN MAY HAVE BEEN REOlJCEDBY PAID CLAIMS.
lrii TYPE OF INSURONCE POLICY NUMll!!R DATE/~ ~ , : . - ,..._T'"+_______LI"1T 7
S'-,,--::-:'.'"""'.c-c--::-
GENEIW. LIABIUTV EACH OCCURRENCE s 1.000,000
A
·-
X Cot.NERCIAL GENERAL LIA.elllTY WIP-G103528-00 01/01/02 01/0. /03 1-F'-'IRc:E...:D:cAMA=Gcc•:..,IAny.=.c."""c..:c"""'+s'-'l"O=-O=-·r...
,0=-0=-0=---
,-._,_~I Cl.NA$ W.OE [!] OCCUR MeD EXP (Any °"e peraon-~'-t-'..,,s~•..,,o-=o-=o·-:-,--
• 1,000,000
-- --------- PERSOW.C. l ADV INJURY
-GEN'L---------
AGGREGATE 1.IMIT APPLIES PER!
GENSRALAGGREGATe
PROOUCTS • COMP/OP AGO
s2,000,000
s 2,000,000
7 POLICY n wtr n ,oc EmD Ben. l. 000 000
AUTOMOBILE UASIUTY
-X COMBINEO SINGLE LIMIT s 1,000,000
A
--
-x
ANYAUTO
All OWNED AUTOS
WIP-Al03528-00 01/01/02 01/01 1 03 f(Ea .occioenl}
------
--
X SCHEOULED AUTOS
80DILY INJURY
(Per ~&on)
t-----------+--------
•
X HIRED AUTOS
~ NON-OWNEO AIJTOS
BODILY INJUAY
(PSI' atA.i!fflll) •
t-- - - - - - - - - - PROPERlY CAMA.Gfi
(Per accident) •
GARAGE UABUJTY AUTOONLY•EAACCIDENT I
R-•UTO Oll-!ER THAN
AUTO ONLY;
EA.ACC S
$
A
E.lces5 LIABIUTV
~ OCCUR • CLAIMS MAO!; WIP-Ul03528-00 01/01/02
EACH OCCURRENCe
01/01 03 ~A~G~GR~Ec;GA_T~E_ _ __
s 1,000,000
sl.000,000_
n
ril
0E:DUCTIBLf
1---------+:':..----·--
s
RETENTION S Q
•
I
TORY LI'41TS I 1~i:,{
0
-- -'-'-=-"'<=~"'-'"'--1---:-::-::--
WCl-1938577 01/01/02 01/ 01 I )3 ~•::.:·'::.·;::EAC=H, 0A.:;.CC.c.lc;cDE:c.NTc.:__-i.;Sc;5=..0=..0=.i..c.
,0.:;.0_0_ _
E,L. DIS"-"Se • EAE/,IPLOYEE S 500, 000
E.L. 018EASE•POLICYLIMIT 1500, 000
OTHER:
C EXCESS LIABILITY 79792764 01/01/02 01/01/)3 PER CLAIM $4,000,000
AGGREGA:rE $4,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSII.OCATIONSNEHICLES/EXCL.U&IOMS ADDED fff ENDOltSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS
CI'n OF MUSkli:GON IS ADDITIONAL INSURED, ATIM!I..
CERTIFICATE HOLDER I y I ADDITl0NALIN$URED: INSUR£R LfflER: CANCELLATION
RJ:IDT-1 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DE CRIBED POLICIE$ BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE SXPmATIOt-
OATI! THEREOF, THE mlUIHG IN UR!R 'M.LL &1,10EA.VOR TO MAIL _l,O_ DAY& WRJmN
NOnCE TO nfE CERTIACAl'E HC DER NAME!O TO THE LEFT, BUT FAA.URE TO 00 SO SHAl.L
CITY OF MUSKEGON IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR UAI UTY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER. JT$ AGENTS OR
993 '?ERIW:E S1'DET
MUSKEGON MI 49442 REPRE!$£NTATIV!$,
AUTHORIZED REPREGeNTATI\IE
'
ACORD 25-S {7/97)
Robert A. I.aVallel> - __ .... ______ .., .. - ..
REQUEST FOR INVOICE TO BE SENT
(COMPLETE AND RETURN TO THE CITY TREASURER'S OFFICE-INVOICES WILL BE MAILED EACH FRIDAY.
REQUEST MUST BE MADE BY 3:30PM ON THURSDAY TO GUARNTEE THEY WILL BE READY ON FRIDAY.)
ORIGINATING DEPT: ~!er/('.:, DATE: _ ___::S"'--_____.,.,,du.O'----------"'o'--~---'-----
CONTACTPERSON:._~L~1
~n.Ll<:d,~CL~---- DEPT. PHONE: 7d Y-0 70~
ACCOUNT TO BE CREDITED: _j_ .£2. _L-00000 _f j,_ J__ ,LAMOUNT: $ c,,'} s-'o-o
ACCOUNT TO BE CREDITED: _ _ _-00000 _ _ _ _ AMOUNT:$ _ _ _ _ __
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CITY SERVICES PROVIDED (I.E. REASON FOR SENDING BILL):
En ccoacdmco I:
CUSTOMER NUMBER: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _P.ARCEL#: 61 _ _ _ _ _ _ __
. e/J
STREET ADDRESS
1/7) Y'!YY'l-d?J'Y 7C 7 -,J 7o 1/
STATE ZIP PHONE
Potter, Linda
From: AI-Shatel, Mohammed
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:41 AM
To: Potter, Linda
Cc: Kundinger, Gail
Subject: encroachment
As you know, last night the commissioners approved the request for an encroachment agreement, could you notify the
applicant and bill them for the $25.
1
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Amendment to the Special Assessment Policy
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
As a result of the most recent Legislative Committee meeting, it is respectfully requested
that the table under section IV of the special assessment policy on page 4 of said policy be
amended to limit the total assessment share to 45% of the total cost of the project instead
of 80%. This amendment does not apply to new subdivision(s) where assessed.
Furthermore, it is requested that if the amended policy is adopted, its implementation be
limited to those projects where special assessment districts have been created after
January 1st of 2002.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None anticipated at this time.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Amend the special assessment policy.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
2002-58(n)
AMENDED TABLE AS OF 05/14/02
Activity/improvement Share of Total Area Amount to be
Cost Assessable Assessed Assessed per
front foot
1. Maintenance 0% 0 N/A
2. Rehabilitation 0% 0 N/A
3. Resurfacing 45% • $6.40 •••
4 Mil Ii ng/Res u rfacing 45% • $11.40 •••
5. Rehab./Resurfacing Majo 45% • $18.70 •••
6. Reconstruction 45% • $19.70 •••
7. New Construction 45% • $19.70
8. New Subdivision 100% •• Actual
(where assessed)
• standard residential width
•• entire improvement performed by City
••• these front foot assessments included an adjustment reflecting credit
for residual value of existing street per Section V (C) (9), with
total assessment not to exceed benefit to abutting property.
V Assessment Policy: Improvements Included; Allocation of
Cost: Financing and Scheduling - This policy shall be
implemented as follows:
A. Design and Engineering - All streets, including subdivision streets, shall be
constructed or reconstructed to engineering standards and design as
established by the City, unless determined that sufficient reasons exist to
provide exception/deviation from standards.
B. New Subdivision Development - All new development requiring streets shall be
the responsibility of the developer; however, when available, and deemed
advisable by the City Commission, the City may utilize special assessment
bonding to provide for street and public infrastructure, assessments to the
properties benefiting to the extent permissible by law.
C. Assessment Method - The method of assessment for the work determined
assessable shall be as follows:
1. Cost of the work shall include all cost directly and indirectly chargeable to
the project.
Adopted 5-14-02.
Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
TABULATION OF SOME OF THE SPECIALY ASSESSED PROJECTS OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS,
Cost & % at the Creation Cost & % at the Spreading
Local Streets S.A Est. cost S. A Cost
morion $24,900.00 $140,000.00 $35,000.00 $118,500.00
Roberts, Lawrence to Wesley $38,000.00 $150,000.00 $52,000.00 $127,000.00
Nelson, Watson Rodgers $65,652.00 $210,000.00 $80,000.00 $275,000.00
Windsor $70,234.00 $250,000.00 $74,000.00 $150,000.00
$198,786.00 $750,000.00 27% $241,000.00 $670,500.00 36%
Major Streets
Laketon, Peck to Wood $27,095.00 $350,000.00 $27,095.00 $445,000.00
Braney $107,580.00 $300,000.00 $107,580.00 $226,000.00
Houston, 1st - Sanford $13,540.00 $85,000.00 $14,931.00 $105,000.00
Laketon, Getty to Creston $41,000.00 $561,000.00
wood $101,800.00 $936,000.00 $103,741.00 $650,000.00
Irwin $45,250.00 $386,000.00 $46,457.00 $32,500.00
Barclay $174,900.00 $600,000.00 $143,000.00 $596,000.00
$470,165.00 $2,657,000.00 18% $483,804.00 $2,615,500.00 18%
Date: May 14,2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
RE: Annual Taxicab License Renewal -
Port City Cab Company & Yellow Cab Company
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This request is from Thomas Wakefield,
owner of Wakefield Leasing, whose office is located at 770 W. Sherman
Blvd., Muskegon, Ml. Mr. Wakefield is requesting approval of a license
to operate 13 taxicabs for both Port City Cab Company and Yellow Cab
Company. The Muskegon Police Department has inspected the
taxicabs and approves this request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of 13 taxicabs.
Mr. Wakefield's insurance was sent to Risk Authority for their approval.
They stated the amounts and coverage are fine however, they prefer a rating
of A- or better on the insurance company. Mr. Wakefield's insurance
company is a C++ rating. Our ordinance does not specify an insurance
company's rating.
APPLICATICl'I FOR TAXICAB OPERATOR
in t.he ·
CITY CF MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN
Name of Company (d,b,a,)
Address of Office
Name & Residence of ) ---..-------,...,..-.,...--p;!-..,,...,.....-.--,<,'---Age_ __
each person interested
in or connected with the )
)
-2~~=·
==.·.!::::::a=~«-;qi:=·
= - - - Age
above, individual, firm or) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Age_ __
Gk
corporation. .)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Age_ __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Age_ __
Present Business of each person
connected with the above application.
Give experience of applicant in taxicab
business in this City or elsewhere.
Number of cabs applicant proposes to use__~-:tlii.e,·li!:'.::.::#llarz..-~/13~--------
Are there any unpaid or unbonded judgments
of record against the applicant
Have any of the persons connected with the above as individual, firm or
corporation been charged with or con~}cted of any crime or misdemeanor,
if so, state.date and Court. ___ ....,_/...,_,Y,c,""----------------------
Name 0£ insurance company with which
applicant is insured and amount of coverage.
-f::::)- i~ • ~ ~
Name of local agent or representative. a,=~;~~?
Is the above applicant the spJ,~CJWner of all. the automobiles
proposed to be used? ~ , ·
State liens, mortgage~ or ot_he}'!ncumbrances _including conditional sales
contracts on such taxicabs. --t-{.Jj~'(_,~~:;.__ _ _ _ _- - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Attached hereto is a list of the automobiles with name of make, body-style,
year, serial and engine number, state license plate number, seating
capacity, weight of car which is considered a part of this application.
The applicant's annual financial and profit and loss statements covering
his operations during the last preceding fiscal year shall be attached to
this application,
Subscribed and sworn to before me
County, Michigan, this \ \ day
Notary Public
Application Approved
Chief of Pol ice
Commission Meeting Date: May 14, 2002
Date: May 7, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor & City Commission
From: Planning & Economic. Development Department cf3L
RE: Amendment to Lease Option Agreement Between
City of Muskegon and Oakview Neighborhood
Association- Extension
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the attached Amendment
Agreement to the Lease Option Agreement between the City of
Muskegon and the Oakview Neighborhood Association, which extends
the time period to complete building repairs on the Madison Street Fire
Barn to December 31, 2002. The original agreement required that
repairs be completed by October 1, 2001.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the attached Amendment
Agreement and authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None.
2002-59(i)
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT
TIDS AGREEMENT is made, effective May 14 , 2002 by and between the
CITY OF MUSKEGON, a municipal corporation, with offices at 933 Terrace Street,
Muskegon, Michigan 49440 ("Landlord"), and Oakview Neighborhood Association, of
1774 Madison Street, Muskegon, Michigan 49443 ("Tenant"). This agreement
constitutes an amendment to a certain Lease Option Agreement between the parties dated
October 1, 1998. In all other respects the said agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
1. Extension of Time for Completion of Improvements. The Tenant shall
have an extended period of time within which to complete the
improvements contemplated by Section 2.1 of the Lease Option
Agreement, so that the time for completion shall now be December 31
2002. The failure of the TenanUo observe this condition may result in
termination of the tenancy as sef forth in Section 12 of the Lease Option
Agreement.
2. Recording and Enforcement. The provisions of this agreement shall
constitute amendments to the Lease Option Agreement at Section 2.1
thereof. This agreement may be recorded, and shall constitute record
evidence of the City's right to termination of tenancy and enforcement of
the agreement. The legal description of the property is:
Lots 16 and 17 ofBlock@, Huizengas Addition, City of Muskegon,
(commonly known as 1774 Madison Street).
3. In all other respects the agreements between the parties shall remain in full
force and effect. It is binding on the parties and their successors and
assigns.
WI1NESSES:
By
By~~~~~~~:,4,dd!JG::,,..,_
Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk
TENANT: OAKVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD
~,~
Its _ _ _ __
STATE OF l\1ICHIGAN
COUNTY OF MUSKEGON
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this l6t6 day of
1!/4,_, 2002 by Steve J. Warmington and Gail A. Kundinger, Mayor and Clerk
respectively, for and on behalf of the City of Muskegon. &f;6.;t,
cf@@ y})_
L,nda ~· /lo ft-er
Notary Public
,
Muskegon County, Michigan
My commission expires: 9-olS:-o;,._
STATE OF l\1ICHIGAN
.COUNTY OF MUSKEGON
The foregoing instrument was aclmowledged before me this _ _ day of
- - ~ 2002 by _ _ _ _ _ ___, · for and on behalf of Oakview
Neighborhood Association.
, Notary Public
Muskegon County, Michigan
My commission expires: _ _ __
Oak.View Neighborhood Association
1774 Madison Street
Muskegon, MI 49442
Phone 727-5697
Home Phone 773-9025
Email Oakviewneighbor@aol.com
April 17, 2002
Cathy Burbaker-Clark
933 Terrace Street
P.O. Box 536
Muskegon, MI 49443-0536
Dear Ms. Burbaker-Clark,
Our association greatly appreciates your assistance and correspondence on the Fire-barn. We have worked
diligently on fund-raisers and the building over the past three years. We feel that the city will be pleased with what
we have accomplished to date, not only on the building itself, but our expanded programs to improve our
community.
Items per the lease agreement that have been completed are the replacement of all broken windows, the repair of all
plumbing and lighting in the garage. The only remaining item is the roof, which the first half was finished in
December of200 I.
With the approval of $3,000 from CDBG we will have the roof completed this year. This is our final obligation per
our lease, as far as repairs. As far as a timetable, this is very realistic. By the second week of July we will have
approximately $1,300.00 of the $1,900.00 difference needed to pay for the roof We also, have a roofer that is
willing to work with us on a payment plan if needed.
Sincerely,
(~~;~ ~~~e~
Patricia Montnfj J
Vice President
Oakview Neighborhood Association
Proposal
To: The honorable Commissioners and Mayor of the City of Muskegon
From: Oakview Neighborhood Association
Subject: Extension on lease agreement regarding repairs.
Dear Sirs and Madams:
We are asking for an extension on our lease agreement regarding the last remaining repair needed at 1774 Madison
Street. Per our contact with Ms. Burbaker-Clark, we were informed that we should ask for this extension. It is with
this that we are submitted this proposal.
To date, all lease requirements with the exception of the second halfofthe roof have been met. We are asking only
for an extension on completion of the second half of the roof. Given that a grant from CDBG has been approved, we
are asking for an extension till December 31, 2002 only.
We thank you for your time and consideration
CITY OF MUSKEGON
RESOLUTION
2002-59(0)
WHEREAS, the city officials of the cities ofMuskegon Heights, Norton Shores
and Muskegon attended a ten week session on Racial Healing; and
WHEREAS, these cities developed a joint organizational plan / commitment with
the objective to create an environment that is respectful to all people. This plan listed
five objective areas that are as follows: ·
• Each Council/Commission have racial healing as an agenda item.
• Staff training- have staffs from the three cities go through Racial Healing
Training.
• Reach out to the whole community (encourage residents to go through the
racial healing training)
• Attend and actively support functions pertaining to diversity. .
• City Councils / Commissions meet again as a whole to discuss the above
commitments in the near future.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Commission of the
City of Muskegon hereby adopts the aforementioned objectives as a priority
toward achieving the commission goal of taking leadership responsibility for
improving race relations.
Gail A Kundinger, City Clerk
Adopted: May 14, 2002
CERTIFICATION
2002-59(0)
This resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Commission, held on May
14, 2002. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act
of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
RACIAL HEALING 10-WEEK SESSION
ATTENDED BY
ELECTED OFFICIALS OF THE CITIES OF
MUSKEGON HEIGHTS, NORTON SHORES AND
MUSKEGON
JOINT ORGANIZATION PLAN/COMMITMENT
OBJECTIVE: CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT THAT
IS RESPECTFUL TO ALL PEOPLE
1. Each Council/Commission to have racial healing as
an agenda item.
2. Staff training- have staff from all three cities go
through Racial Healing Training.
3. Reach out to the whole community. (Encourage
residents of all three communities to go through
racial healing training.)
4. Attend functions pertaining to diversity.
5. The Councils/Commissions to meet again as a
whole to discuss the above commitments. (Date
and time to be determined in the near future.)
Commission Meeting Date: May 14, 2002
Date: May 7, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor & City Commission
From: Planning & Economic Development Department cf.,e.._,
RE: Public Hearing and Plan Approval for Seaway
Business Park LDFA Development and Tax
Increment Financing Plan
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold the public hearing for the Seaway
Business Park LDFA Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan
FINANCIAL IMPACT: No direct impact. However, LDFA funds will be
used to finance projects within the district boundaries.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of plan.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LDFA board met on April 22,
2002 and approved the plan.
2002-60(a)
RESOLUTION APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
FOR LDFA DISTRICT 4, SEAWAY BUSINESS PARK
City of Muskegon
County of Muskegon, State of Michigan
Minutes of a regular meeting of the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County of
Muskegon, State of Michigan (the "City") held in the City Hall in the City, on the 14th day of May, 2002,
at 5:30 o'clock p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
PRESENT: Commissioners
Warmington, 81 Ji e, Gawron, Larson, Scbwei fl er,
Shepherd. Spataro
ABSENT: Commissioners
No
The following preamble and resolution were offered by Commissioner Spat.a ro and
seconded by Commissioner ~G~a~w~r~oun_____
WHEREAS, the Local Development Finance Authority of the City of Muskegon (the "Authority")
has prepared and recommended for approval a Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan (the
"Plan") for LDFA District 4, Seaway Business Park; and
WHEREAS on May 14, 2002, the City Commission held a public hearing on the Plan pursuant to
Act 281, Public Acts of Michigan, 1986 (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS the City Commission has given the taxing jurisdictions within the District (hereinafter
defined) an opportunity to meet with the City Commission and to express their views and recommendations
regarding the Plan, as required by the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT:
I. Definitions. Where used in this Resolution the terms set forth below shall have the
following meaning unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
"Base Year Assessment Roll" means the base year assessment roll prepared by the City Assessor
in accordance with this Resolution.
"Captured Assessed Value" shall have the meaning described in the Act.
"District" means the district described in the Plan.
"Initial Assessed Value" shall have the meaning described in the Act.
"Plan)) means the "Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan" prepared by the Authority, as
transmitted to the City Commission by the Authority for public hearing, confirmed by this resolution,
copies of which Plan are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
"Taxing Jurisdiction" shall mean each unit of government levying an ad valorem property tax
within the District.
"Local Development Finance Authority", ''LDFA" or "Authority" means the Local Development
Finance Authority of the City of Muskegon.
2. Review Considerations. As required by the Act the Commission has in reviewing the
Plan taken into account the following considerations:
(a) The Development Plan included in the Plan meets the requirements set forth in section
15(2) of the Act and the Tax Increment Financing Plan included in the Plan meets the requirements set
forth in section 12(1), (2) and (3) of the Act.
(b) The proposed method of financing the public facilities is feasible and the Authority has
the ability to arrange the financing.
(c) The development is reasonable and necessary to carry out the purposes of the Act.
(d) The amount of Captured Assessed Value estimated to result from adoption of the Plan is
reasonable.
(e) The land to be acquired under the Development Plan, if any, is reasonably necessary to
carry out the purposes of the Plan and the purposes of the Act.
(f) The Development Plan is in reasonable accord with the master plan of the City.
(g) Public services, such as fire and police protection and utilities, are or will be adequate to
service the property described in the Development Plan.
(h) Changes in zoning, streets, street levels, intersections, and utilities, to the extent required
by the Plan, are reasonably necessary for the project and for the City.
3. Public Purpose. The City Commission hereby determines that the Plan constitutes a
public purpose.
4. Best Interest of the Public. The City Commission hereby determines that it is in the best
interests of the public to eliminate the conditions of unemployment, underemployment, and joblessness and
to promote economic growth in the City to proceed with the Plan.
5. Approval and Adoption of Plan. The Plan as submitted by the Authority is hereby
approved and adopted. A copy of the Plan and all amendments thereto shall be maintained on file in the
City Clerk's office.
6. Preparation of Base Year Assessment Roll.
(a) Within 60 days of the adoption of this Resoh1tion, the City Assessor shall prepare the
initial Base Year Assessment Roll for all of the real and personal property within the District. The initial
Base Year Assessment Roll shall list each Taxing Jurisdiction in the District on the effective date of this
Resolution and the amount of tax revenue derived by each Taxing Jurisdiction from ad valorem taxes on all
of the real and personal property within the District, excluding millage specifically levied for the payment
of principal and interest of obligations approved by the electors or obligations pledging the unlimited taxing
power of the local governmental unit.
(b) The City Assessor shall transmit copies of the initial Base Year Assessment Roll to the
City Treasurer, County Treasurer, Authority and each Taxing Jurisdiction which will have Tax Increment
Revenues captured by the Authority, together with a notice that the Base Year Assessment Roll has been
prepared in accordance with this Resolution and the tax increment financing plan contained in the Plan
approved by this Resolution.
7. Preparation of Annual Base Year Assessment Roll. Each year within 15 days following
the final equalization of property in the Project Area, the City Assessor shall prepare an updated Base Year
Assessment Roll. The updated Base Year Assessment Roll shall show the information required in the
initial Base Year Assessment Roll and, in addition, the Tax Increment Revenues for all of the real and
personal property within the District for that year. Copies of the annual Base Year Assessment Roll shall
be transmitted by the Assessor to the same persons as the initial Base Year Assessment Roll, together with
a notice that it has been prepared in accordance with the Plan.
8. Establishment of Project Fund; Approval of Depositary. The Treasurer of the Authority
shall establish a separate fund which shall be kept in a depositary bank account or accounts in a bank or
banks approved by the Treasurer of the City, to be designated Local Development Finance Authority
Project Fund. All moneys received by the Authority pursuant to the Plan shall be deposited in the Project
Fund. All moneys in the Project Fund and earnings thereon shall be used only in accordance with the Plan.
9. Payment of Tax Increment Revenues to Authority. The City Treasurer and the County
Treasurer shall, as ad valorem taxes are collected on for all of the real and personal property within the
District, pay the Tax Increment Revenues, as defmed in the Act, to the treasurer of the Authority for deposit
in the Project Fund. The payments shall be made on the date or dates on which the City Treasurer and the
County Treasurer are required to remit taxes to each of the Taxing Jurisdictions.
10. Annual Report. Within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Authority shall
submit to the City Council and the State Tax Commission, a report on the status of the tax increment
fmancing plan. The repmt shall include the amount and source of tax increment revenues received, the
amount in any Bond Reserve Account, the amount and purpose of expenditures of tax increment revenues,
the amount of principal and interest on any outstanding bonded indebtedness of the Authority, the Initial
Assessed Value for all of the real and personal prope1ty within the District, the Captured Assessed Value
for all of the real and personal property within the District retained by the Authority, the number of jobs
created as a result of the implementation of the Plan and any additional information requested by the City
Council or the State Tax Commission deemed appropriate by the Authority.
11. Refund of Surplus Tax Increments. Annual tax increment revenues in excess of
estimated tax increment revenues or the actual costs of the Plan to be paid by tax increment revenues may
be retained by the Authority only for purposes that by resolution of the Authority's Board are determined to
further the development program in accordance with the Plan. Any surplus money in the Project Fund at
the end of a year, as shown by the annual repmt of the Authority, shall be paid by the Authority to the City
Treasurer or the County Treasurer, as shown by the annual report of the Authority, as the case may be, and
rebated by each to the appropriate Taxing Jurisdiction.
12. All ordinances, resolutions and orders or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of
the Plan are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed, and each section of the Plan and each
subdivision of any section thereof is hereby declared to be independent, and the finding or holding of any
section or subdivision thereof to be invalid or void shall not be deemed or held to affect the validity of any
other section or subdivision of the Plan.
13. Repealer. All resolutions and parts ofresolutions insofar as they conflict with the
provisions of this resolution be and the same hereby are rescinded.
A YES: Commissioners
Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson,
nd Schweifler
NAYS:
Commissioners" -
None
--'""'""'--------------------------
RESOLUTION DECLARED ADOPTED.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of a Resolution adopted by the City
Commission of the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, State of Michigan at a regular meeting held
on May 14, 2002, and that said meeting was conducted and public notice of said meeting was given
pursuant to and in full compliance with the Open Meetings Act, being Act 267, Public Acts of Michigan,
1976, and that the minutes of said meeting were kept and will be or have been made available as required
by said Act.
~~ 0 ~Lv-J
0City Clerk
,,
CITY OF MUSKEGON
SEAWAY BUSINESS PARK
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
2001
I. Legal Description - Authority District and Development Area
The area to which the Development Plan applies includes all of the Authority
District.
The legal description of the Authority District is attached as Exhibit A.
II. Authority District Boundaries
The Authority District is generally bounded by Hackley Avenue to the south,
Seaway Drive to the west, Young Avenue to the North, and Park Street to the east
(see Exhibit B).
ID. Existing Public Facilities and Land Uses in Authority District
The existing public facilities and land uses within the Authority District
are shown on the attached map, Exhibit C. Nearly all of the property
within the Authority District is either vacant or existing industrial with the
exception of a used car dealership that is located at the extreme southwest
comer of the Authority District.
The City of Muskegon Heights abuts the Authority District to the east
(across Park St.) and south (across Hackley Avenue). The dominant land
uses surrounding the Authority District in Muskegon Heights are
commercial and industrial. Furthermore, the development of the
Authority District is being conducted in conjunction with similar industrial
development activities in Muskegon Heights. The cities of Muskegon and
Muskegon Heights have planned a joint industrial development to include
the Authority District and surrounding properties in both communities.
The area surrounding the Authority district is primarily composed of
commercial and industrial property. The exception being, a small section
of residential housing in Muskegon Heights across Park Street. These
homes are surrounded by commercial and industrial properties and
represent a minority land use in the area..
Much of the property within the Authority District is classified as
"facilities" or "brownfields" as those terms are defined in Part 201 of the
Natural Resources and Environmental Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended.
There are no institutional or recreational uses in or near the Authority
District. A cemetery abuts the District directly to the north.
2
A. Existing Streets and Public Facilities
The Authority District is currently accessible directly from
Hackley A venue, Park Street, and Young A venue. The Authority
District is bounded by Seaway Drive (Business Route 31) which is
accessible from Hacldey A venue.
A railroad line that runs diagonally across the District from the
Northwest to the Southeast dissects the Authority District.
The parcels within the Authority District are serviceable by the
City's water and sewer systems.
B. Land Uses
Property within the Authority District that is subject to this
Development Plan is, or is anticipated to be, used as eligible
property under Act 281. All property within the district is
currently zoned Light Industrial (I-1). The parcels of property that
are subject to this Development Plan, as approved by the City, are
currently used as follows:
Parcel Current Use Eligible Property
1 Vacant Yes
2 Former Smith Packing Facility Yes
3 Vacant Yes
4 Vacant Yes
5 Vacant Yes
6 Vacant Yes
7 Vacant Yes
8 Vacant Yes
9 Vacant Yes
10 River City Electr9nics Yes
11 Total Quality Machining Yes
12 Shoreline Metal Finishing Yes
13 Vacant Yes
14 Ernie's Used Cars No
Formerly a small, somewhat substandard neighborhood existed in
the Northeast comer of the Authority_ District however, most of the
residents in that area have been relocated and the property has been
acquired in accordance with federal Uniform Acquisition and
Relocation Guidelines.
3
Proposed private uses within the Authority District are limited to
existing and new eligible uses such as manufacturing or high
technology activities/enterprises and related facilities.
IV. Property Acquisition
A. Public Facilities - There are no existing public facilities proposed
to be acquired for property covered by this plan.
B. Identification ofProperties to be Acquired-The City of
Muskegon bas acquired 12 former residential properties, the
former Smith Meat Packing. facility and several acres of vacant
land prior to the development of this plan. The property acquired
by the City will be marketed and disposed of in a manner
consistent with the goals of this Plan. Other privately owned
properties, which may be determined necessary in order to achieve
the goals of this plan, may be acquired.
C. Legal Basis for Acquisition ofPrivately Owned Properties The
legal basis under which the City of Muskegon or the Local
Development Finance Authority may take or transfer privately
owned property for use in accordance with an approved
development plan is provided in Section 7 (f) and Section 9 of the
Local Development Finance Act (P.A. 281 of 1986, as amended).
v. Proposed Public Facilities and Activities
To the extent necessary to facilitate or as related to the public improvements listed
below, public facilities may include the acquisition of property including
easements, real or personal property or interests in real or personal property, the
cost of demolition, relocation, site preparation, ,and administrative expenses.
Proceeds from the sale ofland acquired with tax: increments revenues will be
retained for further purposes of this plan.
Public facilities to be acquired, expanded or improved are anticipated to include
the following:
1. Acquisition, relocation, demolition and disposal of real and
personal property.
2. Site preparation and land balancing.
4
3. Environmental assessments and response activities for eligible
properties.
4. Installation, improvement or maintenance of sewer, water,
stormwater, gas, electric, and telecommunication infrastructure.( on
site)
5. Expansion and improvement to water facilities to replace capacity
utilized for eligible properties. ·
6. · Noise and other nuisance reduction improvements, including
berming and other natural nuisance reduction techniques and
maintenance of same.
7. Storm water retention basins and the removal or disbursement of
materials produced from the construction of a retention basin.
8. Traffic control improvements including signage, signalization,
lighting and the construction, improvement and maintenance of
roads and sidewalks acc·essing the Authority District.
9. Railroad spur construction.
10. Marketing and promotion.
11. Reimbursement of City of Muskegon expenditures for any of the
above proposed improvements or activities that have begun or
which may be carried out or funded by the City due to legal
obligations or the demands of expediency. Repayment of ULA.
It is estimated that these public facilities will be completed in conjunction with
the development of the properties within the Authority District to which this
Development Plan applies as eligible property under Act 281.
The following schedule indicates the construction, stages of construction, or
completion of activities and the estimated time of completion of each stage or
activity.
1. Property Disposition 2001-2015
2. Site Preparation 2001-2015
3. Environmental Assessment/Due Care As necessary
4. Infrastructure Installation 2002-2004
5. Nuisance Abatement Improvement 2002-2004
6. Storm Water Management 2002-2011
7. Traffic Control Improvements 2002-2011
8. Railroad spur construction As necessary
9. Marketing & Promotion 2001-2011
10. Reimbursement of City Expenditures 2001-2011
5
VI. New Development
New private development will be promoted in the Authority District and is
expected to occur as a result of the activities contained within this plan. The
intent of this plan is to promote, encourage, and otherwise advance the
development of advanced light manufacturing in the City ofwiuskegon. The
character, size, and location of the Authority District lends itself to the
development and growth of new light industrial uses, while not excluding the use
of property for expansion of existing business. Some private projects already in
the development phase include:
VII. Land Acquisition and Disposition
The City of Muskegon is currently title-holder of much of the property in the
· Authority District. The City of Muskegon will have responsibility for future
property acquisition and disposition.
, The Authority may acquire land owned by the City or other private parties. The
, purchase of additional private property for the Authority will be accomplished by
·· the City of Muskegon. The Authority shall reimburse the City for property
acquisition costs, including but not limited to actual purchase cost, environmental
assessment and remediation costs, closing costs, relocation expenses, payments on
a Urban Land Assembly loan from the Michigan Economic Development
Corporation, and other fees or payments required for obtaining proper title to
subject properties. · ·
Except for land needed for planned public improvements as indicated in this plan,
the remaining property acquired will be prepared for development and made
available to private entities for new business uses through appropriate marketing
and promotion activities.
Disposition of property for new business development will be done in accordance
with specific terms and conditions as determined and established by the Authority
and/or the City.
No other property transactions or transfer of property are anticipated but may be
considered by either the Authority or the City if they are determined to be needed
in order to carry out the purposes of this plan.
vm. Zoning, Street, and Utility Changes
Existing zoning for the Authority District is currently I-1 (Light Industrial). It
may be necessary in the future to consider re-zoning a parcel or parcels of
6
property from I-1 in order to accommodate uses considered as "eligible" uses
under Act 281 but not permitted either by right or special permit under the I-1
zoning classification.
Changes in streets, street levels, intersections or utilities are expected only in
connection with the construction of proposed public improvements covered in
Section V and in Exhibits 5 and 6.
IX. Development Cost Esti_mates and Financing
The total cost of completing all of the improvements and activities proposed
within this plan and to be undertalcen and financed by the LDFA and the City of
Muskegon is estimated to be $1,871,559.00. Individual project line item costs are
provided in Exhibit 5. Detailed accounting of cost amounts chargeable to these
projects including administrative and legal expenses, real estate purchases, and
incidental acquisition expenses, surveys, platting, soil borings and analysis,
design, planning, engineering, site preparation, construction, testing, inspection,
marketing, and others will be determined after further project planning is
completed.
Expenses to the Authority for these costs may be financed from one or more of
the following sources:
1. grants, contributions, or donations to the LDFA;
2. revenues from any property owned, leased, or sold by the
LDFA or City of Muskegon;
3. tax increments received pursuant to the Tax Increment
Financing Plan;
4. proceeds of tax increment bonds or revenue bonds;
5. interest on investments;
6. loans from the City or other governmental agency;
7. money obtained from any other legal source approved by
the Muskegon City Commission
The proceeds to be received from tax incremeµt revenues from the Authority
district and from all other authorized sources will be sufficient to finance all of the
improvements and activities to be carried out under this Plan.
7
x. Persons to Whom Public Facilities will be Sold and for Whose Benefit the
Proiect is Being Undertaken
Public improvements described in this Plan will remain under public ownership
by the City of Muskegon or other public entity created or designated by the City
of Muskegon. Parcel of property to be sold for the purpose of private business
development will be transferred to persons or entities to as determined by the
Authority and/or the City of Muskegon.
Proposed projects under the Plan are to be undertaken for the general benefit of
the Seaway Business Park and the citizens of the entire co=unity.
XI. Proposed Land Disposition Terms and Bidding Procedures for Public
Facilities
: The sale of parcels ofland for the development of private business activities shall
· be determined, on a case by case basis, by the Board of the Authority and the
Muskegon City Commission.
" The bidding procedure for the public facilities to be constructed or paid for by the
Authority shall be done in accordance with the established policies and practices
used by the City of Muskegon. The Board of the Authority shall review and
approve all final bids and contracts.
XII. Persons Residing in the Development Area and Number of Families and
Individuals to be Displaced
At the time of adoption, two persons reside in the Authority District to which this
Development Plan applies. These persons are in the process of relocating. Once
these persons have relocated there will be no other residents within the
development area.
XIII. Plan for establishing priority for the relocation of persons displaced by the
development.
Not applicable. Other than the two persons who·are in the process of relocating,
no other persons reside in the district.
XIV. Provision for costs of relocating persons displaced by the development, and
fmancial assistance and reimbursement of expenses in accordance with the
federal uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition policies
act of 1970.
Not applicable. Other than the two persons who are· in the process of relocating, .
no other persons reside in the district.
8
XV. Plan for compliance with Act 227 of the Public Acts of 1972, as amended.
Not applicable.
XVI. Other material which the Authority or City Commission deems pertinent.
Both the Authority and the City Commission have the right to amend this
Development Plan in accordance with the enabling statute, as the Authority or
City Commission determine in the best interest of the City to deal with changes in
conditions, including any legal or legislative changes affecting the plan or to add
to, delete, or reprioritize the public facilities proposed for eligible property within
the Authority District.
9
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
2001
10
I. Reasons the Plan Will Result in Captured Assessed Value
Prior to the establishment of the LDFA district or development of this Plan, the
City of Muskegon committed itself to activities promoting economic development
and the growth of industrial jobs within the Seaway Business Park. Among these
efforts were:
1. Application and approval of a grant from the U.S. Department of
Commerce, Economic Development Administration for the
construction of one new: access road, reconstruction of Young
Avenue and Temple Street, and installation of water/sewer utilities
along the new access road. These improvements will be
completed in 2002.
2. Application and approval of a Urban Land Assembly Loan from
the Nlichigan Economic Development Corporation for the
purchase of approximately 32 acres of vacant or residential
property for new business development.
3. Environmental investigation and remediation necessary for the
appropriate re-use of "brownfield" property.
The Seaway Business Park will provide the City of Muskegon with a new and
premier business location and as such new industrial or heavy commercial uses
will choose the park as a preferred location. This new development will result in
captured assessed value.
Il. Estimate of Captured Assessed Value for Each Year of the Plan
See Exhibit E
m. Estimate of Tax Increment Revenues for Each Year of the Plan
See Exhibit F
IV. Explanation of Tax Increment Procedure
Ta,'( increment financing permits the Authority to capture tax revenues attributable
to increases in the value of eligible property resulting from implementation of a
development plan as defined in Act 281. The tax increment finance procedure is
governed by Act 281. These procedures outlined below are effective as of the
date this Plan is adopted by the Muskegon City Commission, but are subject to
any changes imposed by further amendments to Act 281.
11
The initial assessed value of the Authority District is the assessed value, as
equalized, of the eligible property identified in the tax increment financing plan is
approved as shown by the most recent assessment roll for which equalization ,bas
been completed at the time the resolution is adopted.
This initial assessed value is adjusted each year only by the assessed value, as
equalized, of property which qualified as eligible property after the date the
resolution establishing the Plan was approved. Such subsequent qualified eligible
property shall have its initial assessed value determined as of the date it first
qualified as eligible property.
In each year the Plan is in effect, the "Current Assessed Value" of eligible
property within the Authority District will be determined. The Current Assessed
Value of each parcel of eligible property is its taxable value for that year.
For each parcel of eligible property the amount by which the Current Assessed
Value exceeds its Initial Assessed Value in any one year is the "Captured
Assessed Value" of that parcel of eligible property. For the duration of the plan,
· ta'Gllg jurisdictions will continue to receive tax revenues from all property within
. the Authority District to which this Plan applies that is not eligible property under
Act 281 and based upon the Initial Assesses Value of the eligible property. The
Authority, however receives each year the following amounts:
1. That portion of the ad valorem tax levy of all taxing jurisdictions
on the Captured Assessed Value of the eligible property, other than
the State, local school district and intermediate school district tax
levies, and specific local taxes attributable to such ad valorem
property taxes. ·
2. Ad valorem tax levies, and specific local taxes attributable to such
ad valorem tax levies, of the State, local school districts and
intermediate school district on the Captured Assessed Value of the
eligible property in an amount necessary to repay eligible advances
and/or obligations and other protected obligations, as defined by
Act 281.
To the extent the property within the Authority District to which this Plan applies
is designated as a certified business park under Act 281, tax increment revenues
from all eligible property within that area may be used for public facilities or
activities for any eligible property within the Seaway Business Park. If any parcel
of eligible property within the Authority District is not included within the
designation of a certified business park under Act 281, the tax increment revenues
captured from that eligible property shall only be used for public facilities for that
eligible property.
The Tax Increment Revenues in excess of the estimates set forth in Exhibit For in
excess of the actual costs of this Plan to be paid from Tax Increment Revenues
12
will be considered surplus under Act 281 unless retained to further implement the
Development Plan pursuant to a resolution of the Authority. Surplus Tax
Increment Revenues must revert proportionately to the respective taxing
jurisdictions from which collected.
V. Use of Tax Increment Revenue
The tax increment revenue paid to the LDFA by the municipal and county
treasurers are to be disbursed by the LDFA from time to time in such a manner as
the LDF A Board may deem necessary and appropriate to carry out the purposes
of the Development Plan, including but not limited to the following:
1. Principle, interest, and reserve payments, above and beyond the
revenue captured through property disposition, required to repay
the Urban Land Assembly Loan from the Michigan Economic
Development Corporation or other indebtedness incurred as a
result of the activities outlined in the Development Plan.
2. Cash payments for initiating and completing any improvement or
activity called for in the Development Plan.
3. Any annual operating deficits that the LDFA may incur from
acquired and/or leased property in the development area.
4. Interest payments on any sums that the LDFA should borrow
before or during the construction of any improvement or activity to
be accomplished by the Development Plan, after approval by the
Muskegon City Commission.
5. Payments required to establish and maintain a capital replacement
reserve.
6. Payments required to establish and maintain a capital expenditure
reserve.
7. Payments required to establish and maintain any required sinldng
fund.
8. Payments to pay the costs of any additional improvements to the
Development Area that are determined necessary by the LDFA and
approved by the Muskegon City Commission
9. Any administrative expenditure required to meet the cost of
operation of the LDFA and to repay any cash advances provided
by the City of Muskegon.
If bonds are to be issued in accomplishing this Plan, bond types will be
determined after further project planning is undertaken.
The LDFA may modify its priority of payments at any time if within its discretion
such modification is necessary to facilitate the devel_opment plan then existing and
is permitted under the term of any outstanding indebtedness.
VI. Indebtedness to be Incurred
13
At the time of the approval of this plan, it is not anticipated that any bonded
indebtedness will be incurred by the LDFA Authority or the City of Muskegon for
the purposes outlined in the Development Plan. Both the LDFAand the City of
Muskegon may in their discretion choose to issue bonds for achieving the
purposes of the Development Plan.
VII. Amount of Operating and Planning Expenditures to be Repaid from Tax
Increment Revenues
Not applicable
vm. Costs of the Plan to be Paid from Tax Increment Revenues
All of the costs of implementing the Development Plan will be eligible for
. payment from tax increment revenues, unless said costs are payable from a grant,
• loan, or other contribution other than tax increment revenues.
IX. Duration of Development and Tax Increment Financing Plans
The tax increment financing plan shall last fifteen years except as the same may
be amended or modified from time to time by the City Commission of the City of
Muskegon upon recommendation from the LDFA and upon notice and upon
public hearing and amendment as required by the Act. Various projects within
the Plan may be undertaken in phases. The Development Plan will remain in
effect until its purposes are accomplished.
X. Estimate of Impact of Tax Increment Revenues on AU Taxing Jurisdiction
See Exhibit G
XI. Legal Description of Eligible Property
See Exhibit A.
XII. Estimated Job Creation/Retention
Based on current jobs/acre estimates within the two existing City ofMuskegon
industrial parks the total estimated job creation/retention facilitated through the
implementation of this Plan is 340. There are currently three existing industrial
uses in the Authority District who employ more thaJi a total of 50 people at the
time of the adoption of this Plan.
14
Exhibit A - Authority District Legal Description
Southeast¼ of the Northwest¼, Section 31, Town 10 North, Range 16 West,
City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Michigan.
15
Exhibit B - Authority District Boundary Map
16
\
I
t;;
YOUN
w
~
(9
~
s
tti: ~
W
0
I C/J
,fv~. ex:
::i ~
(9 /2¼ Seawaylotsplits.shp•
'/qSeawayipbndry.shp
streetanno
D Zoning.shp
N
HACKLEY w· C>-£
s
Exhibit C - Line Item Costs
17
SEAWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK BUDGET
Property Acquistion, R.efocatlon, Envfronmental, Demolition
~
Urban land Assembly 600,000
EDA 330,600
Public Improvement Fund 70,000
Nims/Getty Proceeds Zll.QQ!!
TOTAL 1,025,600
Property No. Address Type of Structure Demo, Cost Purehase Price Relocation Allotment Moving Costs Closing Costs Estimated Taxes Environmental Costs Total Acquisition Cost
1 2001 Park Resldenffaf $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2 2005 Park Resldential $3,895 $28,500 $0 $0 $500 $0 $0 $32,895
3 2009Parl{ Residential $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4 2029Park Resldenllal $3,500 $44,000 $10,000 $700 $500 $575 $0 $58,200
5 2101 Park ResidenUal $3,700 $43,000 $14,933 $1,150 $538 $605 $0 $63,321
6 419 Delano ResldenUal $3,500 $38,000 $15,000 $700 $500 $509 $0 $57,200
7 4230ela110 ResldenUal $3,300 $32,000 $14,287 $825 $500 $306 $0 $50,392
8 425Delano Residential $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
9 437 Delano Residential $4,200 $53,000 $13,933 $1,150 $500 $849 $0 $72,283
10 441 Delano Residential $3,300 $31,500 $13,392 $700 $500 $389 $0 $48,89Z
11 420 Delano Residential $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
12 2021 Waafkes Residential $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
13 2026 Waafkes Residential $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . $0 $0
14 2018 Waalkes Residential $3,793 $49,500 $0 $0 $60 $422 $0 $53,353
15 2013 Waalkes Resldenllal . $4,100 $52,000 $0 $0 $472 $732 $0 $56,572
16 Peninsularlnvestments Vacant $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $557 $1,576 $1,800 $18,933
17 Smith Packing lnduslrlal $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $2,708 $1,873 $6,050 $110,831
18 TokarczykProperty Commercial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
19 Blueberry LLC Property Vacant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
20 Nor;vood Properly (3 lg. parcels) Vacant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
-TOTAL
-· $33,288 $488,500 --· ---
$81,525 --
$5,225 $7,335 -- ---
$7,836 --
$0
---
$7,850 - -
$0
$629,559
SEAWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK BUDGET
Infrastructure Construction
Acllvlty Road Water Sewer Total
1 New Access Road $100,770 $64,960 $38,260 $204,000
2 Young Reconstruction $158,000 $0 $0 $156,000
3 Temple Construclion $132,000 $0 $0 $132,000
- ·-
$492,000
SEAWAY BUSINESS PARK
Future Potential Projects and Costs
Water Facilities to replace capacity $100,000.00
Railroad Spur construction $200,000.00
Traffic Control improvements $50,000.00
Storm water retention basins $50,000.00
Noise control $50,000.00
Installation, improvement, maintenance of
sewer, water, telecommunication infrastructure $300,000.00
Total $750,000.00
Exhibit D - Estimated Captured Assessed Value
18
CITY OF MUSKEGON SEAWAY BUSINESS PARK
ESTIMATED CAPTURED ASSESSED VALUES
REAL PROPERTY ONLY
Lot No. 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total/Prop.
Lot1 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $12,000,000
Lot2 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 . $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $12,000,000
Lot3 $0 $0 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $10,500,000
Lot4 $0 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $11,250,000
Lots $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $1,375,000 $22,000,000
LotG $0 $0 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $62!;i,OOO $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $8,750,000
Lot7 $0 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $11,250,DOO
Lota $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $12,000,000
Lot9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Lot 10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Lot 11 $0 $0 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $1,932,000
Lot12 $0 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $875,000 $13,125,000
Lot13 $0 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $625,000 $,625,000 $9,375,000
Lot14 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $7,150,000
TotalrYr. I
$3,625,000 $6,625,000 $8,138,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $8,688,000 $a,saa,ooo $131,332,0001
Statement of Assumptions·
1. Square Footage Estimated Based Upon Maximum Lot Coverage of 40%.
2. True Cash Construction Value Estimates Based Upon Per Square Fpot Cost of $50.
3. Lots 1, 2, 5, 8 Developed ln 2002; Lots 4,7,12, 13 Developed In 2003; Lots 3, 6 Developed in 2004; Lot 14 Developed in 2005
4. Major Persona! Property Expansion on Lol 11 in 2005
CITY OF MUSKEGON SEAWAY BUSINESS PARK
ESTIMATED CAPTURED ASSESSED VALUES
PERSONAL PROPERTY ONLY
Lot No, 2002 2D03 2004 2005 200& 20D7 20D8 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 201& 2017 Total/Prop.
Lot 1 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 . $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $7,200,000
Lot2 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $7,200,000
Lot3 10 ID $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 ,6,300,000
Lot4 ID $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $8,750,000
Lots $825,000 $625,000 $825,000 $825,000 $625,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $825,000 $13,200,000
Lot6 10 ID $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $5,250,000
Lot7 $0 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $6,750,000
Lota $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $7,200,000
Lot9 $0 $0 $0 $0 ID $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ID $1) $0
LOt10 ID $1) $0 $0 $0 10 $0 $0 $0 $0 IO 10 ID $0 $0 $0
Lot 11 $0 $0 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $1,456,000
Lot 12 $0 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $7,875,QOO
Lot13 $0 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 ··$375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 , $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $5,625,000
Lot14 $0 $0 $0 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000 $4,290,000
TotalfYr. $2,175,000 $3,975,000 $4,904,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 $9,234,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 $5,234,000 : $5,234,000 $79,096,000
Statement of A!':sumplions·
1. Squarg Footage Estimated Based Upon Maximum Loi Coverage of 40%.
2. True Cash Personal Property Value Estimates Based Upon F'er Square Foot Cost of $30.
3. Lots 1, 2, 5, 8 Developed In 2002; Lots 4,7,12, 13 Developed in 2003; lots 3, 6 Developed In 2004; Lot 14 Developed ln 2005
4. Msjor Personal Property Expansion on lot 11 in 2005
Exhibit E -Tax Increment Revenue Projections
19
CITY OF MUSKEGON -SEAWAY BUSINESS PARK
TAX INCREMENT REVENUE PROJECTIONS
REAL PROPERTY ONLY
Lot No. 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total/Prop.
Lot1 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $126,000
Loi 2 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $126,000
Lot3 $0 $0 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $110,250
Lot4 $0 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $118,125
Lot 5 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $14,437 $230,992
Lot 6 $0 $0 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $91,868
Lot 7 $0 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $118,125
Lo!B $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $7,875 $126,000
Lot 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Lot10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Lot 11 $0 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $1,449 $21,735
Lot12 $0 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $9,188 $137,820
Lot13 $0 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 . $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $6,562 $98,430
Lot14 $0 $0 $0 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $5,775 $75,075
TotalNr. $38,062 $71,011 $85,448 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $91,223 $1,380,420
Bey_~e Calcul'lllon formula {per lot oer year)
A= Estimated Building Square Footage Per Lot
B = True Cash Property Value Estimate (per sq. ft.) - fixed at $30 AxB/2xC/D=E!
C = Combined City/County Millage Rate (.021 mills)
D = 2 (Consideration of 50% !FT)
E = Estimated TIF Revenue Per Property Per Year
CITY OF MUSKEGON - SEAWAY BUSINESS PARK
TAX INCREMENT REVENUE PROJECTIONS
PERSONAL PROPERTY ONLY
Lot No. 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total/Prop.
Lot1 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $76,608
Lot2 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $76,608
Lot3 $0 $0 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $67,032
Lot4 $0 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $71,820
Lot5 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $8,778 $140,448
Lot 6 $0 $0 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $55,860
Lot 7 $0 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $71,820
Lots $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $4,788 $76,608
Lot9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 , $0 $0
Lot10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Lot 11 $0 $0 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $1;109 $1,106 $1,106 $1,106 $15,484
Lot12 $0 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $5,586 $83,790
Lot13 $0 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $3,990 $59,850
Lot14 $0 $0 $0 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $3,511 $45,643
Total/Yr. $23,142 $42,294 $52,178 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,689 $55,6891 $841,5711
Revenue- Calculation formula (per lot per year)
A = Estimated Building Square Footage Per Lot
B = True Cash Property Value Estimate (per sq. ft.) - fixed at $30 AxB/2xCID=E
C = Combined City/County Millage Rate (.021 mills)
D = 2 {Consideration of 50% !Ff)
E = Estimated TIF Revenile Per Property Per Year
Exhibit F - Estimated Impact on Taxing Jurisdictions
20
CITY OF MUSKEGON - SEAWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK
ESTIMATED IMPACT LOCAL TAXINGAUTHORmES
REAL PROPERTY ONLY
Taxing Authority 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2018 2017 Total/Jurisdiction
City of Muskegon $18,125 $33,125 $40,690 $.43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $43,440 $656,660
County of Muskegon $11,926 $21,796 $26,774 $28,583 $28,583 $28,583 $28,583 $28,583 $26,583 $28,583 $28,583 $28,583 $28,583 $28,583 $28,583 $28,583 $432,075
Muskegon Public School $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Muskegon Area ISO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Hackley Library $4,350 $7,950 $9,765 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $10,425 $157,590
Musltegon Community College $4,029 $7,267 $9,033 $9,643 $9,643 $9,643 $9,543 $9,643 . $9,643 $9,643 $9,643 $9,643 $9,643 $9,643 $9,643 $9,643 $145,708
Total/Year $38,430 $70,158 $86,282 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $92,091 $1,392,033
CITY OF MUSKEGON - SEAWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK
ESTIMATED IMPACT LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITIES
PERSONAL PROPERlY ONLY
Taxing Aulhority 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total/Jurtsdletlon
City of Muskegon $10,983 $20,073 $24,765 $26A31 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $26,431 $399,424
County of Muskegon $7,155 $13,078 $16,134 $17,219 $17,219 $17,219 $17,219 $17,219 $17,219 $17,219 $17,210 $17,210 $17,219 $17,219 $17,219 $17,219 $260,214
Muskegon Publlc School $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Muskegon Area ISO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Hackley Library $2,610 $4,770 $5,885 $6,280 . _$6,280 $6,280 $8,2130 $6,280 $6,2130 $6,280 $6,280 $6,280 $6,280 $6,280 $6,280 $6,280 $94,905
Muskegon Community College $2,414 $4,412 $5,443 $5,809 $5,809 $5,809 $5,809 $5,809 $5,809 $5,809 $5,809 $5,809 $5,809 .$5,809 $5,809 $5,809 .$87,786
Totalffear $23,162 $42,333 $52,227 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 $55,739 .$55,739 $342,329
Commission Meeting Date: May 14, 2002
Date: May 7, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor & City Commission
From: Planning & Economic Development Department CJ3c
RE: Public Hearing and Plan Approval for SmartZone
LDFA Development and Tax Increment Financing
Plan
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To hold the public hearing for the Muskegon
Lakeshore SmartZone LDFA Development and Tax Increment
Financing Plan
FINANCIAL IMPACT: No direct impact. However, LDFA funds will be
used to finance projects within the district boundaries.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of plan.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LDFA board met on April 22,
2002 and approved the plan.
2002-60(b)
RESOLUTION APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
(DISTRICT 3 - MUSKEGON LAKESHORE SMARTZONE)
City of Muskegon
County of Muskegon, State of Michigan
Minutes of a regular meeting of the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County
ofMuskegon, State of Michigan (the "City") held in the City Hall in the City, on the 14th day of
May, 2002, at 5:30 o'clock p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
PRESENT: Commissioners Gawron, Buie, Warmington, Larson, Schweifler,
Shepherd, and Spataro
ABSENT: Commissioners
~
The following preamble and resolution were offered by Commissioner
"w Schweifler and seconded by Commissioner _-',,lli....so..__ _ _ _ __
~
~ WHEREAS, the Local Development Finance Authority of the City of Muskegon (the
i "Authority") has prepared and recommended for approval a Development and Tax Increment
~ Financing Plan for District 3 - Muskegon Lakeshore SmartZone (the "Plan"); and
~-
/l WHEREAS on May 14, 2002, the City Commission held a public hearing on the Plan
;" pursuant to Act 281, Public Acts of Michigan, 1986 (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS the City Commission has given the taxing jurisdictions within the District
(hereinafter defined) an opportunity to meet with the City Commission and to express their
views and recommendations regarding the Plan, as required by the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT:
1. Definitions. Where used in this Resolution the terms set forth below shall have the
following meaning unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
"Base Year Assessment Roll" means the base year assessment roll prepared by the City
Assessor in accordance with this Resolution.
"Captured Assessed Value" shall have the meaning described in the Act.
"District" means the district described in the Plan.
"Initial Assessed Value" shall have the meaning described in the Act.
"Plan" means the "Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan" prepared by the
Authority, as transmitted to the City Commission by the Authority for public hearing, confirmed
by this resolution, copies of which Plan are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
"Taxing Jurisdiction" shall mean each unit of government levying an ad valorem
property tax within the District.
"Local Development Finance Authority", "LDFA" or "Authority" means the Local
Development Finance Authority of the City of Muskegon.
2. Review Considerations. As required by the Act the Commission has in reviewing
the Plan taken into account the following considerations:
(a) The Development Plan included in the Plan meets the requirements set forth in
section 15(2) of the Act and the Tax Increment Financing Plan included in the Plan meets the
requirements set forth in section 12(1), (2) and,(3) of the Act.
(b) The proposed method of financing the public facilities is feasible and the
Authority has the ability to arrange the financing.
~
~ (c) The development is reasonable and necessary to carry out the purposes of the Act.
"'
~• (d) The amount of Captured Assessed Value estimated to result from adoption of the
~
Plan is reasonable.
i
"~- (e) The land to be acquired under the Development Plan, if any, is reasonably
~ necessary to carry out the purposes of the Plan and the purposes of the Act.
~
(f) The Development Plan is in reasonable accord with the master plan of the City.
(g) Public services, such as fire and police protection and utilities, are or will be
adequate to service the property described in the Development Plan.
(h) Changes in zoning, streets, street levels, intersections, and utilities, to the extent
required by the Plan, are reasonably necessary for the project and for the City.
3. Public Purpose. The City Commission hereby determines that the Plan constitutes
a public purpose.
4. Best Interest of the Public. The City Commission hereby determines that it is in
the best interests of the public to eliminate the conditions of unemployment, underemployment,
and joblessness and to promote economic growth in the City to proceed with the Plan.
5. Approval and Adoption of Plan. The Plan as submitted by the Authority is hereby
approved and adopted. A copy of the Plan and all amendments thereto shall be maintained on
file in the City Clerk's office.
6. Preparation of Base Year Assessment Roll.
-2-
(a) Within 60 days of the adoption of this Resolution, the City Assessor shall prepare
the initial Base Year Assessment Roll for all of the real and personal property within the
District. The initial Base Year Assessment Roll shall list each Taxing Jurisdiction in the District
on the effective date of this Resolution and the amount of tax revenue derived by each Taxing
Jurisdiction from ad valorem taxes on all of the real and personal property within the District,
excluding millage specifically levied for the payment of principal and interest of obligations
approved by the electors or obligations pledging the unlimited taxing power of the local
governmental unit.
(b) The City Assessor shall transmit copies of the initial Base Year Assessment Roll
to the City Treasurer, County Treasurer, Authority and each Taxing Jurisdiction which will have
Tax Increment Revenues captured by the Authority, together with a notice that the Base Year
Assessment Roll has been prepared in accordance with this Resolution and the tax increment
financing plan contained in the Plan approved by this Resolution.
7. Preparation of Annual Base Year Assessment Roll. Each year within 15 days
following the final equalization of property in the Project Area, the City Assessor shall prepare
an updated Base Year Assessment Roll. The updated Base Year Assessment Roll shall show the
information required in the initial Base Year Assessment Roll and, in addition, the Tax
f Increment Revenues for all of the real and personal property within the District for that year.
a Copies of the annual Base Year Assessment Roll shall be transmitted by the Assessor to the
~
~ same persons as the initial Base Year Assessment Roll, together with a notice that it has been
i prepared in accordance with the Plan.
8. Establishment of Project Fund: Approval of Depositary. The Treasurer of the
Authority shall establish a separate fund which shall be kept in a depositary bank account or
~~ accounts in a bank or banks approved by the Treasurer of the City, to be designated Local
Development Finance Authority Project Fund. All moneys received by the Authority pursuant
to the Plan shall be deposited in the Project Fund. All moneys in the Project Fund and earnings
thereon shall be used only in accordance with the Plan.
9. Payment of Tax Increment Revenues to Authority. The City Treasurer and the
County Treasurer shall, as ad valorem taxes are collected on for all of the real and personal
property within the District, pay the Tax Increment .Revenues, as defined in the Act, to the
treasurer of the Authority for deposit in the Project Fund. The payments shall be made on the
date or dates on which the City Treasurer and the County Treasurer are required to remit taxes to
each of the Taxing Jurisdictions.
10. Annual Report. Within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Authority
shall submit to the City Council and the State Tax Commission, a report on the status of the tax
increment financing plan. The report shall include the amount and source of tax increment
revenues received, the amount in any Bond Reserve Account, the amount and purpose of
expenditures of tax increment revenues, the amount of principal and interest on any outstanding
bonded indebtedness of the Authority, the Initial Assessed Value for all of the real and personal
property within the District, the Captured Assessed Value for all of the real and personal
-3-
property within the District retained by the Authority, the number of jobs created as a result of
the implementation of the Plan and any additional information requested by the City Council or
the State Tax Commission deemed appropriate by the Authority.
11. Refund of Surplus Tax Increments. Annual tax increment revenues in excess of
estimated tax increment revenues or the actual costs of the Plan to be paid by tax increment
revenues may be retained by the Authority only for purposes that by resolution of the
Authority's Board are determined to further the development program in accordance with the
Plan. Any surplus money in the Project Fund at the end of a year, as shown by the annual report
of the Authority, shall be paid by the Authority to the City Treasurer or the County Treasurer, as
shown by the annual report of the Authority, as the case may be, and rebated by each to the
appropriate Taxing Jurisdiction.
12. All ordinances, resolutions and orders or parts thereof in conflict with the
provisions of the P Ian are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed, and each section of the
Plan and each subdivision of any section thereof is hereby declared to be independent, and the
finding or holding of any section or subdivision thereof to be invalid or void shall not be deemed
or held to affect the validity of any other section or subdivision of the Plan.
cj
...J
a:
ui
13. Repealer. All resolutions and parts of resolutions insofar as they conflict with the
~ provisions of this resolution be and the same hereby are rescinded.
0
~
"'
8
0
A YES: Commissioners Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson,
it
6....
w
u:: Schweifler, and Shepherd
~
0:
w
.... NAYS: Commissioners None
....
:1
-'-'-=~-- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -
RESOLUTION DECLARED ADOPTED.
~o rl~w
J
City Clerk
-4-
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of a Resolution adopted by
the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, State of Michigan at a
regular meeting held on May 14, 2002, and that said meeting was conducted and public notice of
said meeting was given pursuant to and in full compliance with the Open Meetings Act, being
Act 267, Public Acts of Michigan, 197 6, and that the minutes of said meeting were kept and will
be or have been made available as required by said Act.
ti
_J
0.:
uj
z
~
0
z<(
"
0
0
0
0
it
9
w
ii:
~
<i
j
:E
DELIB:2314430.1\063684-00031
-5-
CITY OF MUSKEGON, MICIDGAN
LAKESHORE SMARTZONE, DISTRICT 3
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY
DEVELOPMENT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
March, 2002
CITY OF MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN
LAKESHORE SMARTZONE, DISTRICT 3
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON
DEVELOPMENT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
Preparedfof the: Prepared by:
City of Muskegon, Michigan Public Consulting Team
Lakeshore SmartZone District 3 115 Main Street
Local Development Finance Authority Benton Harbor, Michigan
of the City of Muskegon 490
City Hall
933 Terrace Street
P.O. Box 536
Muskegon, Michigan 49443-0536
PC-f
PUBLlC CONSULTING TE~H
February 28, 2002
Cathy Brubaker-Clarke
Director Community and Economic Development,
City of Muskegon
City Hall
93 3 Terrace Street
P.O. Box536
Muskegon, Michigan 49443-0536
Dear Ms. Brubaker-Clarke:
We are pleased to present the report entitled, CITY OF MUSKEGON, LAKESHORE
SMARTZONE, DISTRICT 3, LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY,
DEVELOPMENT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN. This report has been
prepared pursuant to the scope of services dated December 27, 2001. It contains a summary of
proposed development anticipated to occur in the SmartZone, a list of expenses anticipated to be
funded through tax increment financing and the increment revenue anticipated to be captured by
the Local Development Finance Authority (LDF A) to fund identified expenses.
We have completed a review of the SmartZone application, projected revenues and estimated
expenses of the LDF A In preparing this document, we have consulted with City of Muskegon
and Muskegon Area First personnel who have obtained information necessary for preparation of
the document.
The document has been prepared to conform with Section 12 and 15 of P,A. 281 of 1976, as
amended. These sections set forth legislative requirements for the Local Development Financing
Authority, Development and Tax Increment Financing Plans and the process for approving the
Plans.
You may reproduce this report for general circulation with appropriate reference to the firm,
conditions and date of the report. We will be available to answer any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Charles R Eckenstahler
Director
Public Consulting Team
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION ONE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL OVERVIEW....................................................................................................................................................... 1
POWERS OF TilE AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................................................ 2
FORMATION OF THE AUTHORITY ................................................................................................................................. 4
SCOPE OF THE ASSIGNMENT .......................................................................................................................................... 4
LIMITATIONS OF ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................... 4
SECTION TWO ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
DESCRIPTION OF TilE SMAKJZONE PROJECT ................•........................................................................................................... 6
INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................ 6
SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF CITY FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS ................................................................................. 7
SECTION THREE .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
DEVELOPMENT PLAN ........................................................................................................................................................................ 9
LEGAL BASIS OF THE PLAN ............................................................................................................................................ 9
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 9
Section 15 .. 2(a) ························•·····••·••··•··•······························································--- .......................... 9
Section 15. 2(b) ................................................................................................................................................. IO
Section 15. 2(c) ................................................................................................................................................. IO
Section 15. 2{d) ................................................................................................................................................. 1I
Section 15. 2(e) ................................................................................................................................................. 11
Section 15. 2(l) .................................................................................................................................................. 11
Section 15. 2(g) .. ·---··································································································•·•························ ll
Section 15. 2(b) ................................................................................................................................................. 12
Section 15. 2(i) .................................................................................................................................................. 12
Section 15. 20) .................................................................................................................................................. 12
Section 15. 2(k) ................................................................................................................................................. 13
Section 15. 2(1) ............................................................................. ,.................................................................... 13
Section 15. 2(m) ............................... ,............................................ ,................................................. _ _ _ ]4
Section 15. 2(n) ................................................................................................................................................. 14
Section 15. 2(0) ...... ---·························································································································· l4
Section 15. 2(p) .... ---························································•·••······························•·••···························· l4
DEVELOPMENT & TA,XINCREMENT FINANCING PLAN· SCHEDULE & BUDGET ............................................ 14
SECTION FOUR ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN ............................................................................................................................................ 17
BASE VALUATION ANDASSUMPTIONS ..................................................................................................................... 17
EXPENDITURES OFTHELDFA ...................................................................................................................................... 17
DURATION OF THE LDFA AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN .................................................................. 17
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN ....................................•...................................................................................... 18
APPENDICES
1. District Boundary Map and Legal De~cription
2. Zoning Ordinance Map
3. Fonnation Ordinance and Amendments
4. Notification Materials
5. Adoption Resolution
SECTION ONE
INTRODUCTION
GENERAL OVERVIEW
The Michigan legislature in 1986, enacted Public Act 281 titled the Local Development
Financing Authority Act Tbis legislation allows cities and other qualified local gove=ents to
form an authority to:
"encourage local development to prevent conditions of unemployment and promote
economic growth; to provide for the establishment of local development finance
authorities and to prescribe their powers and duties; to provide for the creation of a
board to govern an authority and to prescribe its powers and duties; to provide for the
creation and implementation of development plans; to authorize the acquisition and
disposal of interests in real and personal property; to permit the issuance of bonds and
other evidences of indebtedness by an authority; to prescribe powers and duties of
certain public entities and state officers and agencies; to reimburse authorities for
certain losses of tax increment revenues; and to authorize and permit the use of tax
increment financing."
PUBLIC CONSULTING TEAM
Since adoption of this act, many cities and other qualified local governments have sought the use
of a.Local Development Finance Authority (LDFA) as a means to stimulate economic
revitalization of selected geographic areas within their community.
An LDF A can establish a district within the City for which a plan is prepared identifying specific
public and private improvements necessary to prevent, or correct, deterioration in the district and
encourage new business investment. Funding for improvements identified in the plan is
provided by tax increment financing through taxes paid on the increased value created within the
district by new private investment.
For example, if the LDFA has a current taxable value of $1,000,000 and new investment,
because of implementation of the Plan, increases the taxable valuation to $2,000,000, the LDFA
would capture taxes paid on the new investment of$1,000,000. While the LDFA would capture
one-half of the total taxes paid, the ta,1:es paid on the original $1,000,000 tax valuation would be
distributed to applicable taxing entities.
In application, investments made by the LDF A are funded by the increase in taxes paid by
private investment in the district. The taxes paid on the original value of the district continue to
be distributed to the applicable taxing entities. Thus in theory, no taxes are lost by any taxing
entity because it is assumed that a specific business would not make the investment resulting in
the increased tax base of the district, if not, for the implepi°entation of the LDFA Development
and Tax Increment Financing Plan.
POWERS OF THE AUTHORITY
Section 7 of the act provides a detailed explanation of the powers of the Board of Directors of the
LDFA. These are as follows:
PUBLIC CONSULTING TEAM
"(a) Study and analyze unemployment, underemployment, and joblessness and the
impact ofgrowth upon the authority district or districts.
(b) Plan and propose the construction, renovation, repair, remodeling, rehabilitation,
restoration, preservation, or reconstruction of a public facility.
(c) Develop long-range plans, in cooperation with the agency which is chiefly
responsible for planning in the municipality, to promote the growth of the authority
district or districts, and take the steps that are necessary to implement the plans to the
fu.llest extent possible to create jobs, and promote economic growth.
(d) Implement any plan of development necessary to achieve the purposes of this act in
acpordance with the powers of the authority as granted by this act
(i) Make and enter into contracts necessary or incidental to the exercise of the board's
powers and the performance of its duties.
(/) Acquire by purchase or otherwise on terms and conditions and in a manner the
authority considers proper, own or lease as lessor or lessee, convey, demolish, relocate,
rehabilitate, or otherwise dispose of real or personal property, or rights or interests in
that property, which the authority determines is reasonably necessary to achieve the
purposes of this act, and to grant or acquire[icenses, easements, and options with
respect to the property.
(g) Improve land, prepare sites for buildings, including the demolition of existing
structures, and construct, reconstruct, rehabilitate, restore and preserve, equip,
improve, maintain, repair, or operate a building, and any necessary or desirable
appurtenances to a building, as provided in section 12(2) for the use, in whole or in
part, of a public or private person or corporation, or a combination thereof.
(h) Fix, cliarge, and collect fees, rents, and charges for the use of a building or
property or a part of a building or property under lhe board's control, or a facility in
the building or on the property, and pledge the fees, rents, and charges for the payment
of revenue bonds issued by the authority.
(i) Lease a building or property or part of a building or property under the board's
.control.
(j) Accept grants and donations ofproperty, labor, or other things of value from a
public or private source.
PUBLIC CONSULTING TEAM
(k) Acquire and construct public facilities.
([) Incur costs in connection with the performance oft/re board's authorized functions
including, but not limited to, administrative costs, and architects, engineers, legal, and
accounting fees.
(m) Plan, propose, and implement an improvement to a public facility on eligible
property to comply with the barrier free design requirements of the state construction
code promulgated under the state construction code act of 1972, Act No. 230 of the
Public Acts of 1972."
FORMATION OF THE AUTHORITY
Action of the City Commission formed the Lakeshore SmartZone, District 3, Local Development
Finance Authority on November 20, 2001 (ResolutionNumber2001-133 (c)) after a conducting
a formal public hearing concerning the creation of the LDFA on August 28, 2001. The
formation of the LDFA was duly recorded with the Michigan Department of State on November
29, 2001.
SCOPE OF THE ASSIGNMENT
Public Consulting Team was chosen to prepare the Development and Tax Increment
Financing Plan according to the scope of services dated December 27, 2001. The objectives of
the Scope of Services are to:
1. Work with City and Muskegon Area First personnel to identify specific programs and
projects which are needed and should be funded via tax increment financing,
PUBLIC CONSULTING TEAM
2. To project tax increment revenue for a 15-year period,
3. To prepare the Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan and assist in the public
presentation of the document before adoption of the update is considered by the City
Commission.
LIMITATIONS OF ANALYSIS
Public Consulting Team does not warrant estimated tax increment revenue, other program
funding or project cost estimates. Cost estimates have been prepared using best available
information obtained from City and Muskegon Area First personnel. While ever effort has been
made to use the best information available for preparing tax revenue and cost projections, actual
revenue and costs may vary from the stated estimate and the variation may be material.
However, budgets and recommendations presented herein, represent the best judgment of the
consulting team based on information gathered within the scope of this assignment.
PUDUC CONSULTING TEAM
SECTION TWO
DESCRIPTION OF THE SMARTZONE PROJECT
INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRil'TION
The purpose of this section is to summarize the proposed SmartZone development project. The
goal of the Muskegon Lakeshore SmartZone is the development new business location sites
where infrastructure can support businesses which focus on selected "core competencies" of
energy and energy related technology plus their related products. State led national marketing of
the sites to prospective businesses will be undertaken by the Michigan Economic Development
Corporation in conjunction with similar efforts by Muskegon Area First.
On September 26, 2000 the City of Muskegon submitted an application for designation as a
Michigan SmartZone. The City in partnership with Muskegon Area First, Grand Valley State
University, and a private developers proposed to designate a 34-acre Muskegon lake:front site as
the SmartZone.
Commitments were received from a wide rang of partners .. Grand Valley State University has
committed to staff and operate the Muskegon Technology Center, an educational and research
facility within the Muskegon lakefront development. The University Padnos School of
Engineering and Seidman School of Business will lease space to house R&D Labs,
teleconferencing facilities, a business incubator, and offer educational programs and other
business assistance programs. The University would also operate an Office of Technology to
PUBLIC CONSULTING TEAM
transfer and privatize university research and advanced technology for private
commercialization. A request has been made to the Michigan Economic Development
Corporation to designate the center as a State Certified Technology Park.
Lakefront Development, L.L.C., a private real estate developer, has committed to develop and
sell 16 building sites. Initially, one site will be sold for occupancy by an affiliated legal firm and
another for the location of the Muskegon Technology Center. The City has committed to fund
selected infrastructure improvements, make effort to secure state financial assistance for site
development expenses and construction of the Technology Center building plus use tax
incrementfinancing for partial operation of the center and other eligible expenses related to the
overall development.
The role of the City of Muskegon through the Lakeshore SmartZone, District 3, Local
Development Finance Authority, is to construct the building necessary to house the Muskegon
Technology Center. The City of Muskegon through other means is providing certain other
infrastructure incentives in support of the development.
The building (Muskegon Technology Center) will house a business incubator and other high
technology facilities meeting the defmition of business incubator or eligible property - high
technology facility found in Section 2 (g) and (p) respectively of Act 281 of 1986, as amended.
SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF CITY FINANCIAL COl.WMITMENTS
The City of Muskegon as part of the SmartZone has made several commitments. First, the City
consented to apply for a State of Michigan Core Communities grant in the amount of
$1,000,0000 to be used for the financing certain needed infrastructure and the Muskegon
PUBIJC CONSULTING TEAM
Technology Center. To assist with the environmental clean-up of the Muskegon lakefront site,
the City received a $1,610,000 Clean Michigan Initiative grant.
The City, through the Local Development Financing Authority will fund several other site and
building development costs and a portion of the operating costs of the Muskegon Technology
Center. Additionally, it will create an endowment or reserve fund for the physical maintenance
of the campus.
Anticipated project expenses to be funded by tax increment financing include:
TIF FINANCED PROJECT EXPENSES
Item Description Estimated Cost
1 Building Construction Debt and Interest $12,402,317
2 Operation Pass-through and Capital Reserve $1,072,626
3 SmartZone Marketing $200,000
Future Infrastructure Development Reserve $0
Total
Notes: (!) This is a budget item for allocation of any TIF'revenue proceeds in excess of current
budget amounts for the express purpose of funding eligible activities required to induce private
development unknown at the time of the adoption of this Plan.
PUBLIC CONSULTING TEAM
City ofMuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan -March 2002 Page9
City of}.Juskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan - March 2002 Page JO
SECTION THREE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
LEGAL BASIS OF THE PLAN
This Development and Tax Increment Plan Update is prepared pursuant to requirements of
Section 15 of the Local Development Financing Act. P.A. 281 of 1986, as amended. It addresses
the Muskegon Lakeshore SmartZone site as defined by City Commission action on November
20, 2001 (Resolution Number 2001-133). A copy of the ordinance and legal description is
contained in the appendix.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
This section of the Plan provides specific information required in Section 15 of the Local
Development Financing Authority Act. It consists of responses to ·specific information requested
in subsections 2(a) through 2(p), as follows:
Section 15. 2(a) A description of the property to which the plan applies in
relation to the boundaries of the authority district and a legal description of the
property.
The LDFA boundary is described in the legal description incorporated in the resolution adopted
by City Commission November 20, 2001 (Resolution Number 2001-133), a copy of which is
contained in the appendix. The site contains 34.2 acres ofland with the common address of 700
Terrace Street, commonly referred to as the Teledyne Site.
The building (Muskegon Technology Center) will house a business incubator and other
high technology facilities meeting the definition of business incubator or eligible
City o/J.vfuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Finaiicing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan - March 2002 Page 11
property - high technology facility found in Section 2 (g) and (p) respectively of Act 281
of 1986, as amended. The building will occupy the site labeled Unit C, illustrated on the
site development plan contained in the appendix.
Section 15. 2(b) The designation of boundaries of the property to which the
plan applies in relation to highways, streets, or otherwise.
A copy of the site development plan and Zoning Ordinance map prepared by the City Planning
Commission is contained in the appendix. These two maps illustrate the relationship of the
boundary;to other relevant land uses and transportation routes surrounding the site.
Section 15. 2( c) The location and extent of existing streets and other public
facilities in the vicinity of the property to which the plan applies; the location,
character, and extent of the categories of public and private land uses then existing
and proposed for the property to which the plan applies, including residential,
recreational, commercial, industrial, educational, and other uses.
This Plan addresses only development needs within the 34 acre vacant and undeveloped
SmartZone site. No off-site improvements are necessary. The LDFA will finance on-site
sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, street pavement, breakwater and abutting sidewalk, site
landscaping and other amenities. The site plan provides for one residential (32 dwelling)
development unit, three retail development units and 12 mixed-se office development units; one
of which will house the public sponsored Muskegon Technology Center. Public spaces include a
park, water-edge walkway, a bike/walk pathway at the soutliem edge of the site, internal public
streets, including a landscaped auto/pedestrian way containing street art and related street
furnishings. The LDFA will also construct the building to house the Muskegon Technology
Center and partially fund operation of the center.
Section 15. 2( d) A description of public facilities to be acquired for the
· property to which the plan applies, a description of any repairs and alterations
necessary to make those improvements, and an estimate of the time required for
completion of the improvements.
City oflvfuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Ta."C Increment Financing Plan -March 2002 Page 12
Other than the contemplated construction, no other public facilities will be constructed or
• improved. A description, of all construction contemplated and financed by the LDFA is
contained in Section Two and the table found at the end of this section, Section Three.
Construction will begin in 2003 and various phases of the construction will be completed during
2003 and 2004.
Section 15. 2(e) The location, extent, character, and estimated cost of the public
facilities for the property to which the plan applies, and an estimate of the time
required for completion.
A description, of all construction contemplated and financed by the LDFA is contained in
Section Three of this Plan. Construction will begin in 2003 and be completed during 2003 and
2004. The Muskegon Technology Center is also scheduled to be constructed in this first phase.
Section 15. 2(t) A statement of the construction or stages of construction
planned, and the estimated time of completion of each stage.
Construction is contemplated as three separate construction projects. Each is anticipated to be
completed during 2003 and 2004, beginning with the construction of the breakwater and abutting
sidewalk, internal street system and finally the southern bike/walk pathway.
Section 15. 2(g) A description of any portions of the property to which the plan
applies, which the authority desires to sell, donate, exchange, or lease to or from the
municipality and the proposed terms.
The site is to be acquired by Lalcefront Development, L.L. C., under the terms of a purchase
agreement they have negotiated with Teledyne Corporation. Upon the development of the site
and the LDFA will construct the Muskegon Technology Center ofland donated to the LDF A by
the developer. Subsequently, the LDFA will lease the building to Grand Valley State
University.
City o/Muskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local DevelopnumtFinancing Authority
Development and Tax increment Financing Plan • March 2002 Page 13
Section 15. 2(h) A description of desired zoning changes and changes in streets,
street levels, intersections, and utilities.
A Planned Unit Development for the Muskegon Lakeshore SmartZone site, received City
Planning Commission approval in July 2000. The site has proper zoning for the proposed
development. Required site engineering for the coordination of all street and on-site utilities has
been accepted by applicable City Departments.
Section 15. 2(i) An estimate of the cost of the public facility or facilities, a
statement of the proposed method of financing the public facility or facilities, and
the ability of the authority to arrange the financing.
The LDFA anticipates construction of the Muskegon Technology Center, a 40,000 square foot
multi-story building, to be leased to Grand Valley State University. The estimated cost for the
building is $4,000,000. The construction of the building Will be fmanced by the LDFA through
tax increment financing. The LDFA has solicited statements of interest and is assured of the
LDFA' s ability to secure financing for the proposed project.
Section 15. 2(j) Designation of the person or persons, natural or corporate, to
whom all or a portion of the public facility or facilities is to be leased, sold, or
conveyed and for whose benefit the project is being undertaken, if that information
is available to the authority.
Lakeshore Development, L.L.C. will acquire from the Teledyne Corporation the 34 acre site and
donate development site, Unit C, to the LDFA. All other ~evelopment sites will be sold to
other private concerns for the location of new businesses compatible with other SmartZone
businesses, except for development site, Unit P, which will be developed or sold for the
construction of residential condominium dwelling units.
Section 15. 2(k) The procedures for bidding for the leasing, purchasing, or
conveying of all or a portion of the public facility or facilities upon its completion, if
there is no express or implied agreement between the authority and persons, natural
or corporate, that all or a portion of the development will be leased, sold, or
conveyed to those persons.
City ofiWuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan -March 2002 Page 14
. Representatives of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon Area First, Grand Valley State University,
Michigan Economic Development Corporation and Lakeshore Development, L.L.C. have been
involved in negotiations concerning the terms of land acquisition and other factors for the
development for over three years. ·Development agreements between the City through the Local
Development Financing Authority govern various transactions with these parties. Due to these
agreements, there will be no public bidding procedures used for the sale or leasing of real estate
or building occupancy.
Section 15. 2(1) Estimates. of the number of persons residing on the property to
which the plan applies and the number of families and individuals to be displaced. If
occupied residences are designated for acquisition and clearance by the authority, a
development plan shall include a survey of the families aud individuals to be
displaced, including their income and racial composition, a statistical description of
the housing supply in the community, including the number of private and public
units in existence or under construction, the condition of those in existence, the
number of owner-occupied and renter-occupied units, the annual rate of turnover of
the various types of housing and the range of rents and sale prices, an estimate of
the total demand for housing in the community, and the estimated capacity of
private and public housing available to displaced families and individuals.
There are no residential properties nor homes located on the parcel. No relocation of families or
individuals is contemplated within the scope of the Development and Tax Increment Financing
Plan.
Section 15. 2(m) A plan for establishing priority for the relocation of persons
displaced by the development.
No relocation of families or individuals is contemplated within the scope of the Development
and Tax Increment Plan. Therefore, relocation plans are not required.
Section 15. 2(n) Provision for the costs of relocating persons displaced by the
development, and financial assistance and reimburs~ment of expenses, including
litigation expenses and expenses incident to the transfer of title, in accordance with
the standards and provisions of the federal uniform relocation assistance and real
property acquisition policies act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. 4601 to 4655.
City of Muskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development F;nancing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan - .J.lfarch 2002 Page 15
No relocation of families or individuals is contemplated within the scope of the Development
and Tax Increment Financing Plan. Therefore, relocation plans are not required.
Section 15. 2(o) A plan for compliance with Act No. 227 of the Public Acts of
1972, being sections 213.321 to 213.332 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
No relocation of families or individuals is contemplated within the scope of this proposed
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan. Therefore, relocation plans are not required.
Section 15. 2(p) Other material which the authority, local public agency, or
governing board considers pertinent.
No added information was deemed necessary for this update.
DEVELOPMENT & TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN- SCHEDULE & BUDGET
On the following page is the Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan - Schedule and
Budget. It describes specific projects. Accompanying each construction project is information
concerning the implementation schedule, estimated cost and source of funding. The schedule
begins in the Year 2003 and ends in the Year 2025.
If LDFA revenues exceed the anticipated needs of all projects contained the budget, excess
revenue shall be remitted to respective taxing units in proportion to applicable tax millage rates
imposed on property in the LDFA District, as required by the Act (Section 13 (2)).
City ofMuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan March 2002
M Page 16
1 Repayment of Building Construction 2008/2025 $12,402,317 TIP Revenue
Debt and Interest Obligation
2 Operation Pass-through and Capital Reserve 2006/2025 $1,072,626 TIP Revenue
City of Nh1skegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, Di.strict 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax increment Financing Plan - March 20(12 Page 17
3 SmartZone Marketing 2004/8 $200,000 TIFRevenue
4(1) Future Infrastructure Development Reserve 2004/2025 $0 TIFRevenue
TOTAL $13,674,943
City of.Muskegon, f..akeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan~ March 2002 Page 18
Notes: (1) This is a budget item for allocation of any TIF revenue proceeds in excess of current budget amounts for the express
purpose of funding eligible activities required to induce private development unknown at the time of the adoption of this Plan.
City ofMuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authorify
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan -March 2002 Page 19
SECTION FOUR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAl'T
BASE VALUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS
According to the City Assessor, the current valuation (2002) of the 34.2 acres site is $557,134.
The City Assessor has estimated the average annual increase of property values in the immediate
area has paralleled the national inflation rate. New private development is projected to occur in
accord with the schedule set forth in Tables 1 through 4. No consideration was given to personal
property which may increase the property value of the district.
EXPENDITURES OF THE LDFA
Expenditure of the LDFA were discussed in the Development Plan and summarized in the table
found on page 16. In addition to the expenditures listed, it is assumed the LDFA will
incur approximately $6,000,000 bonded indebtedness. Specification of this debt are
depicted in Tables 1 though 4.
DURATION OF THE LDFA AND TAX INCREMENT.FINANCING PLAN
The duration of the Development Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan is conterminous withe
the SmartZone agreement between the City of Muskegon. Michigan Economic Development
Corporation, and Grand Valley Sate University.
City ofMuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local De-velopmenJ Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan -March 2002 Page 20
TAX INCRElVIENT FINANCING PLAN
The Local Downtown Financing Act, requires the LDFA to address several legislative
requirements in the Tax Increment Financing Plan. These provide information about funds
anticipated to be received by the LDF A and its impact upon taxing jurisdictions. These
requirements are found in Section 12(a) through Section 12 (1) of the Act and states that "if the
board determines that it is necessa1y for the achievement of the purposes of this act, the board
shall prepare and submit a tax increment financing plan to the governing body. The plan shall
be in compliance with section 13 and shall include a development plan as provided in section
15."
Specifically the Tax Increment Financing Plan must contain, information addressing the
following:
(a) A statement of the reasons that the plan will result in the development of
captured assessed value that could not otherwise be expected. The reasons may
include, but are not limited to, activities of the municipality, authority, or others
undertaken before formulation or adoption of the plan in reasonable anticipation
that the objectives of the plan would be achieved by some means.
The agreement between the City of Muskegon, Michigan Economic Development Corporation,
Grand Valley State University and the private developer, Lakeshore Development, L.L.C. detail
a complex incentive based development agreement. Neither party cited has the financial
capacity to undertalce the proposed project. As such the development would not occur if not for
the collective individual commitment of all parties. There is no other means to undertake the
proposed development.
(b) An estimate of the captured assessed value for each year of the plan. The
plan may provide for the use of part or all of the captured assessed value or, subject
to subsection (3), of the tax increment revenues attributable to the levy of any taxing
jurisdiction, but the portion intended to be used shall be clearly stated in the plan.
The board or the municipality creating the authority may exclude from captured
City a/Muskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authori'ty
Development and Tax increment Financing Plan - lvfarch 2002 Page21
assessed value a percentage of captured assessed value as specified in the plan or
growth in property value resulting solely from inflation. If excluded, the plan shall
set forth the method for excluding growth in property value resulting solely from
inflation. ·
See Tables -1 to 6.
(c) The estimated tax increment revenues for each year of the plan.
See Table -4.
(d) A detailed explanation of the tax increment procedure.
See Introduction Section of Development Plan (pages 1 and 2).
( e) The maximum amount of note or bonded indebtedness to be incurred, if any.
The amount of the bonded indebtedness will not exceed $7,000,000.
(±) The amount of operating and planning expenditures of the authority and
municipality, the amount of advances extended by or indebtedness incurred by the
municipality, and the amount .of advances by others to be repaid from tax increment
revenues.
The City of Muskegon and the LDFA have incurred planning and other start-up cost for the
organization and formation of the LDFA and the preparation of this Development and Tax
Increment Financing Plan. The LDFA does not contemplate reimbursing the City for these
incurred costs from tax increment fmalizing proceeds. The LDF A does not contemplate the use
of Tax Increment financing proceeds for payment of any administrative cost incurred by the
City.
(g) The costs of the plan anticipated to be paid from tax increment revenues as
received.
See table of Page 16 titled, DEVELOPNIBNT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN.
(h) The duration of the development plan and the U½'C increment plan.
City of}duskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan -March 2002 Page22
. The duration of the Development Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan is conterminous withe
the SmartZone agreement between the City of Muskegon. Michigan Economic Development
Corporation, and Grand Valley Sate University.
(i) An estimate of the impact of tax increment fmancing on the revenues of all
taxing jurisdictions in which the eligible property is or is anticipated to be located.
Upon designation of the Muskegon Technology Center and LDFA District as a "Certified
Technology Park" by the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, the LDFA District
authorized by the Plan contemplates the capture of all incremental real and personal property
taxes levied within the LDFA District. See Table -1 through 4.
(j) A legal description of the eligible property to which the tax increment
financing plan applies or shall apply upon qualification as eligible property.
See Appendix.
(k) An estimate of the number of jobs to be created as a result of implementation
of the tax increment fmancing plan.
Muskegon Area First estimates that at full development total employment will exceed 1,000.
(!) The proposed boundaries of a certified technology park to be created under
an agreement proposed to be entered into pursuant to section 12a, an identification
of the real property within the certified technology park to be included in the tax
increment fmancing plan for purposes of determining tax increment revenues, and
whether personal property located in the certified technology park is exempt from
determining tax increment revenues.
The boundary of the Certified Technology Park will be conterminous with the LDFA Financing
District. The LDF A contemplates the capture of all incremental real and personal property taxes
levied within the LDFA District
City of Muskegon Local Development Finance Authority
Projected Tax Increment Revenues and Debt Service Coverage
Page 1 of4
TABLE 1
HOMESTEAD PROPERTIES
Fiscal Years Current Initial Captured School Non-School School Non-School
Ended or Ending Assessed Assessed Assessed Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Increment Tax Increment
December 31 Valuation Valuation Valuation Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Revenues Revenues
2003 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $21.2824 (2) $0 $0
2004 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $0
2005 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $0
2006 $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 $4.3921 (1) $21.2824 $6,588 $31,924
2007 $3,675,000 $0 $3,675,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $16,141 $78,213
2008 $5,850,000 $0 $5,850,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $25,694 $124,502
2009 $6,525,000 $0 $6,525,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $28,658 $138,868
2010 $7,200,000 $0 $7,200,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $31,623 $153,233
2011 $7,875,000 $0 $7,875,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $34,588 $167,599
2012 $8,550,000 $0 $8,550,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $37,552 $181,965
2013 $9,225,000 $0 $9,225,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $40,517 $196,330
2014 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $43,482 $210,696
2015 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $4.3921. $21.2824 $43,482 $210,696
2016 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $43,482 $210,696
2017 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $43,482 $210,696
2018 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $43,482 $210,696
2019 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $43,482 $210,696
2020 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $4.3921 $21.2824 $43,482 $210,696
2021 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $210,696
2022 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $210,696
2023 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $210,696
2024 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $210,696
2025 $9,900,000 $0 $9,900,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $210,696
(1) 50% of 2001 State Education and Muskegon Intermediate School District levies of 6.0000, 2.7842, and 18.0000 mills, respectively.
Not assumed to change. LDFA can capture 50% of school levies (exclusive of debt) for a period not to exceed 15 years.
(2) 2001 City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Muskegon Community County and Hackley Library levies of 10.0792, 6.5799,
2.2233 and 2.4000 mills, respectively. Not assumed to change.
Source: City of Muskegon
City of Muskegon Local Development Finance Authority
Projected Tax Increment Revenues and Debt Service Coverage
Page 2 of 4
TABLE2
NON-HOMESTEAD PROPERTIES
Fiscal Years Current lnttial Captured School Non-School School Non-School
Ended or Ending Assessed Assessed Assessed Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Increment Tax Increment
December31 Valuation Valuation Valuation Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Revenues Revenues
2003 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $0.0000 $21.2824 (2) $0 $0
2004 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $0
2005 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $0
2006 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $13.3921 (1) $21.2824 $0 $0
2007 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $13.3921 $21.2824 $0 $0
2008 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $13.3921 $21.2824 $0 $0
2009 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $13.3921 $21.2824 $0 $0
2010 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $13.3921 $21.2824 $0 $0
2011 $557,134 $557,134 $0 $13.3921 $21.2824 $0 $0
2012 $8,159,134 $557,134 $7,602,000 $13.3921 $21.2824 $101,807 $161,789
2013 $12,028,634 $557,134 $11,471,500 $13.3921 $21.2824 $153,627 $244,141
2014 $20,168, 134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $13.3921 $21.2824 $262,632 $417,369
2015 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $13.3921 $21.2824 $262,632 $417,369
2016 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $13.3921 $21.2824 $262,632 $417,369
2017 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $13.3921 $21.2824 $262,632 $417,369
2018 _$20, 168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $13.3921 $21.2824 $262,632 $417,369
2019 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $13.3921 $21.2824 $262,632 $417,369
2020 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $13.3921 $21.2824 $262,632 $417,369
2021 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $417,369
2022 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $417,369
2023 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $417,369
2024 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $417,369
2025 $20,168,134 $557,134 $19,611,000 $0.0000 $21.2824 $0 $417,369
(1) 50% of 2001 State Education, Muskegon Intermediate School District, and Muskegon Public Schools Operating levies of 6.0000, 2. 7842, and 18.0000
mills, respectively. Not assumed to change. LDFA can capture 50% of school levies (exclusive of debt) for a period not to exceed 15 years.
(2) 2001 City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Muskegon Community County and Hackley Library levies of 10.0792, 6.5799,
2.2233 and 2.4000 mills, respectively. Not assumed to change.
(3) Increase due to the expiration of an CEZ abatement and the return of the abated property to the ad valorem tax roll. See page 3 of 4.
Source: City of Muskegon
City of Muskegon Local Development Finance Authority
Projected Tax Increment Revenues and Debt Service Coverage
Page 3 of 4
TABLE3
COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE ZONES
Fiscal Years Current Initial Captured School Non-School School Non-School
Ended or Ending Assessed Assessed Assessed Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Increment Tax Increment
December 31 Valuation Valuation Valuation Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Revenues Revenues
2003 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $10.6412 (2) $0 $0
2004 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $10.6412 $0 $0
2005 $0 $0 $0 $0,0000 $10.6412 $0 $0
2006 $7,602,000 $0 $7,602,000 $6.6961 (1) $10.6412 $50,903 $80,894
2007 $11,471,500 $0 $11,471,500 $6.6961 $10.6412 $76,814 $122,071
2008 $19,611,000 $0 $19,611,000 $6.6961 $10.6412 $131,316 $208,685
2009 $19,611,000 $0 $19,611,000 $6.6961 $10.6412 '" $131,316 $208,685
2010 $19,611,000 $0 $19,611,000 $6.6961 $10.6412 $131,316 $208,685
2011 $19,611,000 $0 $19,611,000 $6.6961 $10.6412 $131,316 $208,685
2012 $12,009,000 $0 $12,009,000 $6.6961 $10.6412 $80,413 $127,790
2013 $8,139,500 $0 $8,139,500 $13.6961 $10.6412 $54,502 $86,614
2014 $0 $0 $0 $6.6961 $10.6412 $0 $0
2015 $0 $0 $0 $6.6961 $10.6412 $0 $0
2016 $0 $0 $0 $6.6961 $10.6412 $0 $0
2017 $0 $0 $0 $6.6961 $10.6412 $0 $0
2018 $0 $0 $0 $6.6961 $10.6412 $0 $0
2019 $0 $0 $0 $6.6961 $10.6412 $0 $0
2020 $0 $0 $0 $6.6961 $10.6412 $0 $0
2021 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $10.6412 $0 $0
2022 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $10.6412 $0 $0
2023 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $10.6412 $0 $0
2024 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $10.6412 $0 $0
2025 $0 $0 $0 $0.0000 $10.6412 $0 $0
(1) 25% of 2001 State Education, Muskegon Intermediate School District, and Muskegon Public Schools Operating levies of 6.0000, 2. 7842, an
18.0000 mills, respectively. Not assumed to change. LDFA can capture 50% of school levies (exclusive of debt) for a period notto exceed
15 years. · ·
(2) 50% of 2001 City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Muskegon Community County and Hackley Library levies of 10.0792, 6.5799,
2.2233 and 2.4000 mills, respectively. Not assumed to change.
Source: City of Muskegon
City of Muskegon Local Development Finance Authority
Projected Tax Increment Revenues and Debt Service Coverage
Page 4 of 4
TABLE4
Total Total
School Non-School Total Total
Fiscal Years Tax Tax Tax Debt Service Verification of
Ended or Ending Increment Increment Increment Interest Capitalized on the "1 to 5 Rule" Excess
December31 Revenues Revenues Revenues Principal Rate Interest Interest Bonds Compliance Coverage (Shortfall)
2003 $0 $0 $0 $0
2004 $0 $0 $0 ($284,332) $0 $0
2005 $0 $0 $0 ($310,180) $0 $0
2006 $57,492 $112,818 $170,310 ($155,090) $155,090 1.10x $15,220
2007 $92,955 $200,283 $293,238 ($25,848) $284,332 , 1.03x $8,906
2008 $157,010 $333,187 $490,197 $135,000 5.65% $0 $445,180 21.60% 1.10x $45,017
2009 $159,975 $347,552 $507,527 $155,000 5.80% $0 !,457,553 24.80% 1.11x $49,974
2010 $162,939 $361,918 $524,857 $180,000 5.95% $0 $473,563 28.80% 1.11x $51,295
2011 $165,904 $376,283 $542,187 $205,000 6.10% $0 $487,853 32.80% 1.11x $54,335
2012 $219,772 $471,543 $691,316 $355,000 6.25% $0 $625,348 56.80% 1.11x $65,968
2013 $248,647 $527,085 .$775,732 $455,000 6.40% $0 $703,160 72.80% 1.10x $72,572
2014 $306,114 $628,065 $934,179 $0 $844,040 100.00% 1.11x $90,139
2015 $306,114 $628,065 $934,179 $0 $847,790 54.31% 1.10x $86,389
2016 $306,114 $628,065 $934,179 $0 $847,790 49.30% 1.10x $86,389
2017 $306,114 $628,065 $934,179 $0 $847,790 44.89% 1.10x $86,389
2018 $306,114 $628,065 $934,179 $0 $847,790 40.76% 1.10x $86,389
2019 $306,114 $628,065 $934,179 $0 $847,790 37.18% 1.10x $86,389
2020 $306,114 $628,065 $934,179 $0 $847,790 33.85% 1.10x $86,389
2021 $0 $628,065 $628,065 $0 $567,790 74.29% 1.11x $60,275
2022 $0 $628,065 $628,065 7.70% $0 $568,150 80.00% 1.11x $59,915
2023 $0 $628,065 $628,065 7.80% $0 $565,810 85.71% 1.11x $62,255
2024 $0 $628,065 $628,065 7.90% $0 $570,710 93.33% 1.10x $57,355
2025 $0 $628,065 $628,065 8.00% $0 $567,000 100.00% 1.11x $61,065
$3,407,493 $10,267,449 $13,674,94 ($775,450) $12,402,317 $1,272,626
Source: City of Muskegon
- · Capital
Appreciation
Bonds
City of Muskegon Local Development Finance Authority
SCHOOL TAXING JURISDICTION IMPACT ANALYSIS
TABLES
iscal Years Total Taxing Unit See Note 1
ded or Ending Tax Increment State Intermediate Muskegon Total
ecember31 Revenue Education School District Public School
2003 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2004 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2005 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2006 $57,492 $12,879 $5,976 $38,636 $57,492
2007 $92,955 $20,823 $9,663 $62,469 $92,955
2008 $157,010 $35,172 $16,321 $105,517 $157;!')10
2009 $159,975 $35,836 $16,629 $107,5og $159,975
2010 $162,939 $36,501 $16,937 · $109,501 $162,939
2011 $165,904 $37,165 $17,246 $111,494 $165,904
2012 $219,772 $49,232 $22,845 $147,695 $219,772
2013 $248,647 $55,700 $25,847 $167,100 $248,647
2014 $306,114 $68,574 $31,820 $205,720 $306,114
2015 $306,114 $68,574 $31,820 $205,720 $306,114
2016 $306,114 $68,574 $31,820 $205,720 $306,114
2017 $306,114 $68,574 $31,820 $205,720 $306,114
2018 $306,114 $68,574 $31,820 $205,720 $306,114
2019 $306,114 $68,574 $31,820 $205,720 $306,114
2020 $306,114 $68;574 $31,820 $205,720 $306,114
2021 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2022 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2023 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2024 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2025 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,407,493 _E_63,323. $35'l,206 _$2,289,96_5_ $3,407',493.
(1) 50% of2001 State Education, Muskegon Intermediate School District. and Muskegon Public Schools Operating levies of6.0000, 2.7842, and 18.0000
mills, respectively. Not a.ssumed to change. LDFA can capture 50% of school levies (exclusive of debt) for a period not to exceed 15 years.
(2) 2001 City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Muskegon Community County and Hackley Library levies of 10.0792, 6.5799,
2.2233 and 2:4000 mills, respectively. Not assumed to change.
City of Muskegon Local Development Finance Authority
NON SCHOOL TAXING JURISDICTION IMPACT ANALYSIS
TABLES
iscal Years Total Taxing Unit See Note 2
ded or Ending Tax Increment Muskegon Muskegon Muskegon Hackley Total
ecember 31 Revenue City County Community Library
2003 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2004 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2005 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2006 $112,818 $53,430 $34,880 $11,786 $12,722 $112,818
2007 $200,283 $94,853 $61,922 $20,923 $22,585 $200,283
2008 $333,187 $157,795 $103,012 $34,807 $37,572 $333,186
2009 $347,552 $164,598 $107,453 $36,308 $39,192 $347,552
2010 $361,918 $171,402 $111,895 $37,808 $40,812 $361,917
2011 $376,283 $178,205 $116,336 $39,309 $42,432 $376,283
2012 $471,543 $223,320 $145,788 $49,261 $53,175 $471,543
2013 $527,085 $249,624 $162,959 $55,063 $59,438 $527,084
2014 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2015 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2016 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2017 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2018 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2019 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2020 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2021 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2022 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2023 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2024 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
2025 $628,065 $297,447 $194,179 $65,612 $70,825 $628,064
$10,267,449 $4,862,592 $3,174,398 $1,072,610 $1,157,829 $10,267,429
(1) 50% of2001 State Education, Muskegon Intermediate School District, and Muskegon Public Schools Operating levies of6.0000, 2.7842, and 18.0000
mills, respectively. Not assumed to change. LDFA can capture 50% of school levies (exclusive of debt) for a period not to exceed 15 years.
(2) 2001 City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Muskegon Community County and Hackley Library levies of 10.0792, 6.5799,
2.2233 and 2.4000 mills, respectively. Not assumed to change.
City ofMuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan - March 2002 Page 23
APPENDICES
1. District Boundary Map and Legal Description
2. Zoning Ordinance Map
3. Formation Ordinance
4. Notification Materials
5. Adoption Resolution
1
DRIESENGA& Engineering
ASSOCIATES, INC. Surveying·
J990419
Testing
9-28-99
Teledyne Property being purchased by Lakefront Development, LLC
Part ofB1ocks 554 and 558 of the Revised Plat of the City ofMuskegon, as recorded in Liber 3 of
Plats, Page 71, Muskegon County Records, described as follows: CO:MMENCING at the most
Southerly comer of Block 556 of said. plat; thence North 62 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West
1248.69 feet along the Northerly line ofTerrace Street extended; thence Westerly 269.86 feet along
said Northerly line on a 302.48 foot radius curve to the left, the chord of which bears North 88
degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West 261.00 feet; thence North 46 degrees 09 minutes I 5 seconds
West 85.84 feet along the line between Lots 5 and 6 .of said Block 558 to the TRUE PLACE OF
BEGINNING, said point being on the Northerly line of that .parcel of land taken by the City of
Muskegon for the construction of Shoreline Drive, a pedestrian walkway and the relocation of the
railioad right of way, (said Northerly line being described in Schedule A attached to City of
Muskegon Resolution No. 98-87(:f) and adopted by the City Commission on July 28, 1998); thence
continuing along said line between Lots 5 and 6 of said Block 558, North 46 degrees 09 minutes 15
seconds West 448.41 feet; thence North 27 degrees 25 minutes 55 seconds East 850:00 feet to an
intermediate traverse line along the shore ofMuskegon Lake, said point being called "A", (said point
"A" being approximately 85' from the waters edge of Muskegon Lake; (the following eight (8) calls
being along said intermediate traverse line) thence South 65 degrees 45 minutes 16 seconds East
874:97 feet; thence North 26 degrees 49 minutes 35 seconds East 136.75 feet; thence South 63
degrees 46 minutes 08 seconds East 283. 79 feet; thence North 29 degrees 04 minutes 15 seconds
East 189.14 feet; thence South 60 degrees 19 minutes 21 seconds East 182.84 feet; thence South 26
degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds East 320.52 feet; thence North 86 degrees 15 minutes 34 seconds
East 281.56 feet; thence South 50 degrees 57 minutes 54 seconds East 490.90 feet to a point on the
Northerly line of said parcel taken by the. City, said point being called "B"; thence Northeasterly
131.86 feet, along a 1272.34 foot radius curve to the left, the chord of which bears North 70 degrees
58 minutes 46 seconds East 131.80 feet to the Northeasterly line ofsaidBlock554; thence Northwest
along said Northeasterly line to the waters edge of Muskegon Lake; thence recommencing at said
point "B"(the following seven (7) calls being along the Northerly line of said parcel taken by the
City), thence Southwesterly416.86 feet, along a 1272.34 foot_i;adius curve to the right, the chord of
which bears South 83 degrees 20 minutes 04 seconds West 41-5.0,0 feet; thence North 87 degrees 16
minutes 46 seconds West 904.15 feet; thence North 02 degrees 43 minutes 14 seconds East 55.00
feet; thence North 87 degrees 16 minutes 46 seconds West 120.00 feet; thence South 02 degrees 43
rninufes 14 seconds West 55.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 16 minutes 46 seconds West 222.59
feet; thence Southwesterly 635.15 feet, along a 803.25 foot radius curve to the left, the chord of
which bears South 70 degrees 04 minutes 05 seconds West 618.73 feet to the place of beginning.
Together with all lands lying between the intermediate traverse line and the waters edge oflvfuskegon
Lake and the Northeasterly line of said Block 554. Containing 34,2 !!cresmore or less. Together with
and subject to easements ofrecord.
D 570 East 16th Street. Suite 400 a 3522 Rager B. Chaffee • 11 3 West Savidge Street
Holland. Michigan 49423 · Grand Rapids. Michigan 49548 Spring Lake, Michigan 49456
Ph. (61 6 I 396-0255 Ph. [6161 245-5710 Ph IR1Rl~4R.1qRn ..
City ofMuskegon, Lakeshore Smart Zone, District 3, Local Development Financing Authority
Development and Tax Increment Financing Plan ~ March 2002
2
General Location of Muskegon Lakeshore SmartZone
G
l
~ Teledyne Property
Muskst
CJ Parcel
N
w E
s
Zoning Map
Zoning.shp
0 1
','<'~ g
1~,1~r •
~B-2
na,•1 s-3
QB-4
DB-5
~H
01~1
lv'.C I 1-2
l'~'&i~f,I LR
mosc
~
~ 0"""'
i;tr'\
··r;e,r
~-it(~~:''' PUD OL
1C,•,, · "
1~~it.ri ""
I"\.•
1
11r::,~;};tl RM-1
CJRM-2
I '< I RM-3
CJRT
CJWI-PUD
CJWM
N
w E
s
4
5
Ile~ RESOLUTION CREATING LDFA DISTRICT
~
2001-133(c)
Minutes of a regular meeting of the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County
of Muskegon, State of Michigan, held at the City Hall in said City on the 13th day of November,
2001, at 5:30 o'clock p.m. prevailing Eastern Time.
PRESENT: Members __S,.,,ha,.,e.,p"'h"'e,_r,,,_ct.,_,..,S"'p""a""ta""r'-'o"-'1'-.CAees=la""k""s""o"'n,.,,....=Be""n"'e"'d"'i""c-"-t.,_,-'B"'u""i'-"ec.!.,_ _ __
Nielsen Schweifler
ABSENT: Members _~N""o"'n"°e'------------------------
The following preamble and resolution were offered by Member _.....,,.S"'p,.,.at"'a""r-"o'---_ and
supported by Member Schweifler:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Act 281, Public Acts of Michigan, 1986, as
amended ("Act 28 I") the City of Muskegon (the "City") created the Local Development
Finance Authority of the City of Muskegon (the "Authority") by a resolution adopted by the City
Commission (the "LDFA Resolution"); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has decided to create a new district, the Muskegon
• Lakeshore SmartZone, District 3 ( "District 3") within which the Authority exercises its powers
(the "District"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Act 281 the City is required to hold a public hearing on the
proposed establishment of District 3; and
WHEREAS, on August 28, 2001, the City Commission conducted a public hearing on
the proposed establishment of District 3; and
WHEREAS, more than 60 days have elapsed since the public hearing and the City Clerk
has not received any resolutions from a taxing unit subject to capture exempting its taxes from
capture; and
WHEREAS, after consideration the City Commission has determined to approve the
establishment of District 3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. Determination of Necessity. The City Commission hereby determines that it is
necessary for the best interests of the City to create District 3 in order to eliminate the causes of
unemployment, underemployment and joblessness and to promote economic growth in the City.
2. Designation of Boundaries of District. The boundaries of the District in which the
•
Authority shall exercise its powers as provided in Act 281 shall consist of the territory of the
1
City described in Exhibit A (District 3) attached hereto and made a part hereof, subject to such
changes as may hereinafter be made pursuant to Act 281.
3. Amendment of the LDFA Resolution; Conflict and Severability. The LDFA
Resolution is hereby amended to incorporate the amended boundaries of the District as stated
above and is otherwise ratified and confirmed as being in full force and effect. All other
ordinances, resolutions and orders or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this
resolution are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed.
4. Publication, Recording and Filing. This resolution shall be published once after
its adoption in full in the Muskegon Chronicle, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of
Muskegon and the City Clerk shall file a certified copy of the resolution with the Michigan
Secretary of State promptly after its adoption.
5. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its publication.
2
CERTIFICATES
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of a Resolution duly
adopted by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, State of
Michigan, at a regular meeting held on November 13, 2001, and that said meeting was conducted
and public notice of said.meeting was given pursuant to and in full compliance with the Open
Meetings Act, being Act 267, Public Acts of Michigan, 1976, as amended, and that the minutes
of said meeting were kept and will be or have been made available as required by said Act.
I further certify that the following Members were present at said meeting .
Shepherd, Spataro; Aslakson, Benedict, Buie, Nielsen, Schweifler
And that the following Members were absent --'...,N,,o"'n,,e~~.c._~'-'----'--'--------
·I further certify that Member Spa taro moved· adoption of said resolution and
that Member Schweifler supported said motion.
I further certify that the following Members voted for adoption of said resolution
·AsJaks::n, &nfdict, fl lie, Niel en, S::1::keifler. ;hePJerd, ;wt;,ro
0
and ·that the following
Members voted against adoption of said resolution None ~ .
. ~Q,~,ggd_
City Clerk O .-
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution received legal publication in the Muskegon
Chronicle on November 22 ,2001, and that a certified copy of the foregoing resolution was
filed with the Michigan Secretary of State on No~e:16 2 0 ~ ·· ··
0
City Clerk ~
3
EXIDBIT A
Description of Boundaries of District 3 (Muskegon Lakeshore SmartZone)
The boundaries of the proposed district as revised within which the local development
finance authority shall exercise its powers are as follows:
Parcel Description:
Block 554, and Lots 6, 7 and 8 of Block 558, of the Revised Plat of the City of Muskegon, as
recorded in Liber 3 of Plats, Page 71, Muskegon County Records, lying Northerly of a line
described as: Commence at the intersection of the Northeasterly line of Terrace Street, being the
Southwesterly line of Block 557 extended to the centerline.of vacated Water Street; thence North
62°44'00" West 381.45 feet along the northeasterly right of way line of Terrace Street; thence
Westerly 269.86 Feet, along said northeasterly right of way line, said line being a 302.48 foot
radius curve to the left with a central angle of 51 °07'00" and a chord which bears North
88°17'30" West 261.00 feet, to the line between Lots 5 and 6 of said Block 558; thence North
46°09'15" West 85.84 feet, along said line, to the PLACE OF BEGINNING OF TIDS
DESCRIPTION: Thence Northeasterly 635.15 feet along a 803.25 foot radius curve to the right,
having a central angle of 45°18'19" and a chord which bears North 70°04'05" East 618.73 feet;
thence South 87°16'46" East 222.59 feet; thence North 02°43'14" East 55.00 feet; thence South
87°16'46" East 120.00 feet; thence South 02°43'14" West 55.00 feet; thence South 87°16'46"
East 904.15 feet; thence Northeasterly 548. 72 feet, along a 1272.34 foot radius curve to the left,
having a central angle of24°42'35" and a chord which bears North 80°21'56" East 544.48 feet
to the place of ending.
EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING
Part of Block 558, commence at the intersection of the No1iheasterly line of Terrace Street
extended to the centerline of vacated Water Street; thence North 62 degrees 44 minutes 00
seconds West along the Northeasterly line of Terrace Street extended 381.45 feet; thence
Westerly along the arc of a 302.48 foot radius curve to the left 269.86 feet to the line between
Lots 5 and 6 of said Block 558 (long chord bears North 88 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West
261 feet); thence North 46 degrees 9 minutes 15 seconds West along said line between Lots 5
and 6, 534.25 feet to the place of beginning; thence North 27 degrees 25 minutes 55 seconds East
925.82 feet !o a point referred to as Point "A"; thence continue North 27 degrees 25 minutes 55
seconds East 5 feet, more or less, to the shore of Muskegon Lake; thence Northwesterly and
Southwesterly along the shore of Muskegon Lake 1350 feet, more or less; thence South 46
degrees 9 minutes 15 seconds East along said line between Lots 5 and 6, 820 feet, more or less,
to the place of beginning.
Property Commonly Known As: Former Teledyne Continental Motors Site
DELIB:2247223.1\063684-00024
4
Commission Meeting Date: April 9, 2002
Q)CJlG(~
I~~
Date: March 26, 2002 -k' ~ '-\ .,{_
u ei,,1. l
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners r' o
From: Planning & Economic DevelopmentC!.3e. . l ,f..J
RE: Expansion of Clay-Western Historic District ©ch0\?. .1.-o
-------------------------~\-Jl'-'----+-\-\--J,,.,Q..
~
t""'
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
. ~'~~~i,
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the expansion of Clay-Western Historic District
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
None
3/26/2002 1
Site Map of the Proposed Boiler Works Historic District
City ofMuskegQn~Michigan_
//
!/
I
/
/
LEGEND:
Historic-Districts
C . .J Clay-Western
[__ :_:_] National Register
[_:___] Houston
[ ____ ~ __ -_1 Campus
! ::·7 Mclaughlin
,r------!
l___:.,.J Jefferson
c-r:r TT TT TT :
I _-- · · · ] Clinton-Peck '-- L_j'):: i Iii ·-1
!- _,LJlL_i 11
j" __-.:_::·J Downtown Structures
1----ii1,__:;:::---1
/-_ ~ iT!TriE
1
~--,--ii I! I:' l-1'
- Double-A-district l_ ~ [_ J L_.__J,_[_ _;_ J '
! __] Boiler-Works '7 ~ -i~T~WG~Qi_VfT ,1---=_J ~ _q,r~11
l l ~ ~- J: --~--~:~~i=-. _--~ ---,1_,c.__
.i--i.'------,'
:
C
I
I
Prepared by:
Planning Oeparlrnenl
City of Muskegon, Ml
January2002/mw
F,la; planni,ig\hdG\boie,worksapr
Site Map of the Proposed Boiler Works Historic District
Ci o ·c · a
LJ Downtov-m Structures
- Double-A-district
LJ Boiler-Works
PNipe,edb-/:
Planrwlg Department
Cl:/ of Muskogon. Ml
Janu,ry 20'l2lmw
File: planring'-hdc\boJerwalcs..apr
Resolution No.
MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE EXPANSION OF CLAY-WESTERN HISTORIC
DISTRICT TO INCLUDE THE BOILER WORKS PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, the Boiler Works property is described as parcel number 24-205-317-0009-
00 located on W. Clay Avenue, with a legal description as Revised Plat of 1903, City of
Muskegon, Lots 7 through 13 Block 317.
WHEREAS, the Westwood Group, a local developer, plans to redevelop the Boiler
Works property for commercial and offices, the supplement of an historic preservation
tax credit will allow them a viable investment in downtown Muskegon.
WHEREAS, the historic preservation tax credit can only apply to rehabilitation of historic
structures located within an established historic district, the Westwood Group requested
the Historic District Commission (HOC) subcommittee to complete a research study for
its designation.
WHEREAS, the HOC subcommittee has determined that Boiler Works is a significant
and contributing resource to the character and integrity of Clay-Western Historic District,
and provides an awareness of the relationships that existed in neighborhoods between
business, industry and residences in City of Muskegon's history.
WHEREAS, under state statute in establishing an historic district (Section 399.203 of
Public Act 169), the local legislative body will conduct a public hearing and make a
determination.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Muskegon City Commission approves the
expansion of Clay-Western historic district to include Boiler Works property as described
above.
Adopted this - - - day of April, 2002
Ayes:
Nays:
By: -~-~~c----c--c--"77-----
Steve J. Warmington, Mayor
Attest:~~~~--~~-----
Gail Kundinger, Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing constitute a true and complete copy of a resolution adopted by
the City Commission of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, Michigan at a regular meeting held on
April 9, 2002.
By: - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - - - - -
Gail Kundinger, Clerk
Resolution No.
MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE EXPANSION OF CLAY-WESTERN HISTORIC
DISTRICT TO INCLUDE THE BOILER WORKS PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, the Boiler Works property is described as parcel number 24-205-317-0009-
00 located on W. Clay Avenue, with a legal description as Revised Plat of 1903, City of
Muskegon, Lots 9 through 13 Block 317.
WHEREAS, the Westwood Group, a local developer, plans to redevelop the Boiler
Works property for commercial and offices, the supplement of an historic preservation
tax credit will allow them a viable investment in downtown Muskegon.
WHEREAS, the historic preservation tax credit can only apply to rehabilitation of historic
structures located within an established historic district, the Westwood Group requested
the Historic District Commission (HOC) subcommittee to complete a research study for
its designation.
WHEREAS, the HOC subcommittee has determined that Boiler Works is a significant
and contributing resource to the character and integrity of Clay-Western Historic District,
and provides an awareness of the relationships that existed in neighborhoods between
business, industry and residences in City of Muskegon's history.
WHEREAS, under state statute in establishing an historic district (Section 399.203 of
Public Act 169), the local legislative body will conduct a public hearing and make a
determination.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Muskegon City Commission approves the
expansion of Clay-Western historic district to include Boiler Works property as described
above.
Adopted this _ _ _ day of April, 2002
Ayes:
Nays:
By:-~----~-~~----
Steve J. Warmington, Mayor
Attest: - ~ - - - - - - - - - - -
Ga ii Kundinger, Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing constitute a true and complete copy of a resolution adopted by
the City Commission of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, Michigan at a regular meeting held on
April 9, 2002.
By:---------------
Gail Kundinger, Clerk
DRAFT
03/05/02
CITY OF MUSKEGON
MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN
ORDINANCE NO.
---
An ordinance amending Chapter 11 of the Code of Ordinances concerning Historic
Districts and the Historic District Commission.
RECITAL
The City Commission of the City of Muskegon having been approached for the purpose
of establishing a historic district for the Boiler Works building, Parcel Number 24-205-317-
0009-00. The City Commission having appointed a historic study committee, which
recommends the creation of a historic district for such property.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION HEREBY ORDAINS:
ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 11-5 of the Historic District Ordinance entitled "Creation and boundaries of
district" is amended to read in it entirety as follows:
Section 5 Creation and boundaries of districts.
The following historic districts are hereby created:
(1) Houston Historic District - All land located within an area described by blocks
336,337,348,349,350,351; block 367, lots 3-10; block 368.
(2) Campus Historic District - All land located within an area described by blocks
396, 397, 399.
(3) McLaughlin Historic District - All land located within an area described by
blocks 226, lots 1-5, and 12; blocks 227,228,229, block 230, lots 1-5 and 14;
block 238, lots 1-5 and 12; blocks 239,240,241, block 242, lots 7-10; blocks 243,
253, block 254, easterly 66 feet of lots 7-10, block 362, lots 10-19; block 383, lots
7-12, block 394, lots 9-16.
(4) Clinton-Peck Historic District - All land located within an area described by
block 275, lots 1-9; block 276, lots 7-14; block 277, block 278, lots 1-6; blocks
288,289, block 300, lots 1-6; block 423, lots 7-12; block 424, lots 7-12; block
444, lots 7-12; block 445, lots 7-12.
G:\EDSI\FILES\00100\0845\ORDIN\A25197.DOC
(5) Jefferson Historic District-All land located within an area described by block
425, lots 1-6; block 426, lots 8-14; block 442, lots 8-14; block 443, lots 1-6; block
446, W 162 feet lot 1, N 74-1/2 feet ofW 154 feet lot 2, and N 75 feet ofS 149-
1/2 feet ofW 154 feet lot 2; block 447, lots 8-14; block 463, lots 7-9 and E 105.1
feet lot 1O; block 464, lots 1-4.
(6) Clay-W estem Historic District - All land located within an area desc1ibed by
blocks 314,315,316,323,568 and 570, and lots 9-13 of Block 317.
(7) National Register Historic District - All land located within an area described by
blocks 324, 325, 326; block 327, lots 4-9; block 334, lots 4-9; block 335.
(8) The following land area is hereby included within the Historic Districts: Block
313, lots 1, 2 and the east 20 feet of lot 3; block 327, lots I 0, 11; block 334, lots
l-3 and 10-12.
This ordinance adopted:
Ayes:
-----------------------------
Nays:-----------------------------
Adoption Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Effective Date:
-----------
Fi rs t Reading: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Second Reading: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned, being the duly qualified clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon
County, Michigan, does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of an
ordinance adopted by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, at a regular meeting of the
City Commission on the ___ day of _ _ _ _ _ __,2002, at which meeting a quorum
was present and remained throughout, and that the original of said ordinance is on file in the
records of the City of Muskegon. I further certify that the meeting was conducted, and public
notice was given, pursuant to and in full compliance with Act No. 267, Public Acts of Michigan
G:\EOS I\FILES\001 00\0845\ORD!N\A2519 7. DOC
of 1976, as amended, and that minutes were kept and will be or have been made available as
required thereby.
Dated:. _ _ _ _ _ _~ 2002
Gail A. Kundinger, CMC/AAE
Clerk, City of Muskegon
Publish: Notice of Adoption to be published once within ten (I 0) days of final adoption.
G:\EDS!\FILES\00100\0845\ORDIN\A25197.DOC
PARMENTER a-TOOLE
Allom eys at Law
175 West Apple Avenue • P.O. Box 786 • Muskegon, Michigan 49443-0786
Phone 231 .722.1 621 • Fax 231.722.7866 or 231.728.2206
www.Parmenterfaw.com
March 5, 2002
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Michael Wee
Planning Department
City of Muskegon
933 Tenace Street
P.O. Box 536
Muskegon, :M I 49443-0536
Re: Creation and Boundaries of Districts
Dear Mr. Wee:
Enclosed is a revised proposed Ordinance.
Please call me as to any revisions.
John C. Schrier
Direct: 231-722-5401
Fax: 231-728-2206
E-mail Address: j cs@parmenterlaw.com
Jey
Enclosure
G:IEDSI\FILES\00100\0845\LTRIA28532.DOC
Date: February 12, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Finance Director
RE: Pension Ordinance Clarification
SUMMARY OF REQLJEST: Section 10(d) of the City's Police & Fire Retirement
System ordinance provides that "a member who remains in the employ of the city but
. ceases to be a police officer or a firefighter shall remain a member of the retirement
system for the duration of his City employment." This provision ·recently came.into
play when the former Fire Marshall assumed the position of Director of Inspections.
The current ordinance does not, however, specify the benefits or contributions
pertaining to an affected employee. Attached is a technical correction ordinance
intended to address this matter. It provides that the contributions and benefits will be
the same as if the member had not left employment with the Police or Fire
Departments.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None. The position was budgeted with the
pension benefits accorded to a Fire Department position.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
At the Legislative Policy Committee meeting held Wednesday, April 24, 2002
Legislative Policy Committee voted to adopt the ordinance as recommended by staff and
legal counsel. Vote was 4 Yeas, 1 Absent, 2 Nays.
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Finance Director
RE: First Quarter 2002 Budget Reforecast
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: At this time staff is recommending adoption of the
attached first quarter budget reforecast. Since the budget reforecast was originally
presented, the following additional changes have been made: 1) estimated LDFA pass-thru
revenue to the general fund has been increased due to the fact that there will be pass-thru's
for two years in 2002, 2) the capital budget for fire station relocation has been pared from
$250,000 to $100,000 and, 3) the scheduled transfer to the Major Street fund has been
reduced from $200,000 to $100,000. These actions were necessary to bring the budget back
into alignment.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Not surprisingly, the first quarter 2002 Budget Reforecast
reflects a falloff in expected general fund revenues due to the economy. Significant
adjustments have been made in the areas of city income tax, state shared revenues and
interest income. Helping offset these losses are stronger than expected building permit
revenues, LDFA pass-thru funds, and income tax penalties.
Proposed General fund expenditures have been reduced a net $272,234 from the amount
originally budgeted. Primary changes are: 1) the elimination of the Community Center
Design capital item based on recent Commission goal prioritization ($92,000) and, 2) the
elimination of the scheduled Budget Stabilization fund transfer because the City was able to
fund this item in 2001 ($100,000), reduction in the transfer to the Major Street fund
($100,000) and reduction in the budget for Central Fire Station relocation ($150,000).
Partially offsetting these reductions, however, are higher than anticipated insurance and legal
service costs (see attached for details}.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: Self-explanatory.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Reforecast and related budget
amendments.
9/18/97
CITY OF MUSKEGON
GENERAL FUND
HISTORICAL SUMMARY
Revenues & Expenditures & Fund Balance
Year Transfers In Transfers Out at Year-End
1992 $ 11,297,076 $ 11,282,444 $ 1,538,372
1993 13,990,266 13,231,208 2,297,430
1994 15,301,973 15,572,689 2,026,714
1995 16,633,179 16,337,586 2,322,307
1996 17,666,214 18,018,159 1,970,362
1997 20,437,646 20,358,321 2,049,687
1998 21,643,855 21,634,467 2,059,075
1999 21,451,681 22,011,881 1,498,875
2000 23,685,516 22,232,657 2,951,734
2001 23,446,611 23,235,978 3,162,367
Fiscal 2002 Budget Summary
FUND BALANCE AT START OF YEAR $ 3 162 367
MEANS OF FINANCING:
Taxes 13,344,426 56.7%
Licenses and Permits 1,016,500 4.3%
Federal Grants 208,705 0.9%
State Grants 73,269 0.3%
State Shared Revenue 5,502,601 23.4%
Other Charges 2,014,543 8.6%
Interest & Rentals 488,043 2.1%
Fines and Fees 357,200 1.5%
Other Revenue 366,435 1.6%
Other Financing Sources 177,400 0.8%
23,549,122 100.0%
ESTIMATED REQUIREMENTS:
Customer Value Added Activities 17,411,032 71.4%
Business Value Added Activities 4,129,684 16.9%
Fixed Budget Items 2 831 743 11.6%
24,372,460 100.0%
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE AT END OF YEAR $ 2 339 029
OPERATING SURPLUS (DEFICIT) $ (823,338)
TARGET FUND BALANCE (10% PY EXPENDITURES) $ 2,323,598
ESTIMATED EXCESS (SHORTFALL) vs. TARGET $ 15,431
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - General Fund
General Fund Revenue Summary By Source
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru Revised Budget Change From From 2002
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Estimate 2002 2002 Original Original Comments
Available Fund Balance • BOY $ 2,059,875 $ 2,951,735 $ 3,124,987 $ 3,162,368 $ 3,162,368 $ 37,381
Taxes
City income tax $ 7,078,571 $ 6,820,171 $ 6,850,000 $ 1,641,480 $ 6,650,000 $ (200,000) -2.92% ECONOMIC SLOWDOWN
Property taxes - general 3,686,780 3,940,343 4,219,038 4,219,038 0.00%
Property taxes - sanitation 1,630,491 1,670,955 1,808,160 1,808,160 0.00%
Property taxes - pass-thru from LDFA II 103,000 210,000 107,000 103.88%
Industrial facilities taxes 362,676 353,742 367,228 367,228 0.00%
Payments in lieu of taxes 69,148 75,758 80,000 80,000 0.00%
Delinguent chargeback collected 3,769 17,514 10,000 5,548 10,000 0.00%
$ 12,831,435 $ 12,878,483 $ 13,437,426 $ 1,647,028 $ 13,344,426 $ (93,000} -0.69%
Licenses and permits
Business licenses $ 32,363 $ 31,239 $ 37,500 $ 3,370 $ 37,500 $ 0.00%
Liquor licenses 35,511 36,427 37,500 6,110 37,500 0.00%
Cable TV franchise fees 327,004 204,820 250,000 250,000 0.00%
Housing licenses 62,965 66,126 75,000 16,590 75,000 0.00%
Burial permits 104,160 98,735 100,000 23,628 100,000 0,00%
Building permits 368,333 333,798 250,000 102,408 300,000 50,000 20.00% STRONG ACTIVITY
Electrical permits 87,692 127,055 75,000 26,308 100,000 25,000 33.33% STRONG ACTIVITY
Plumbing permits 45,147 48,863 45,000 9,814 45,000 0.00%
Heating permits 62,847 65,495 70,000 16,230 70,000 0.00%
Franchise fees 1,100 1,000 1,000 0.00%
P_()_lice gun registration 1,879 2,040 325 500 500 0.00%
$ 1,129,001 $ 1,014,598 $ 941,000 $ 204,783 $ 1,016,500 $ 75,500 8.02%
Federal grants
F_ederal 012:erational grant $ 522,111 $ 417,925 $ 208,705 $ 2,289 $ 208,705 $ 0.00%
$ 522,111 $ 417,925 $ 208,705 $ 2,289 $ 208,705 $ 0.00%
State grants
State 012:erational grant $ $ 17,569 $ 73,269 $ $ 73,269 $ 0.00%
$ $ 17,569 $ 73,269 $ $ 73,269 $ 0.00%
State shared revenue
State sale_§_~ $ 5,486,712 $ 5,748,523 $ 5,750,000 $ $ 5,502,601 $ (247,399) -4.30% MOST RECENT FIGURES FRQM STATE
$ 5,486,712 $ 5,748,523 $ 5,750,000 $ $ 5,502,601 $ {247,399) -4.30%
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - General Fund
General Fund Revenue Summary By Source
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru Revised Budget Change From From 2002
Actua!2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Estimate 2002 2002 Original Original Comments
Other charges for sales and services
Tax administration fees $ 224,399 $ 232,349 $ 250,000 $ $ 250,000 $ 0.00%
Utility administration fees 166,032 175,215 174,965 43,741 174,965 0.00%
Reimbursement for elections 30,568 20,534 12,000 12,000 0.00%
Indirect cost reimbursement 925,008 908,256 941,778 223,020 941,778 0.00%
Site~plan review fee 1,800 895 1,000 226 1,000 0.00%
Sale of cemetery lots 24,269 25,275 18,000 3,933 18,000 0.00%
Sale of co!umbarium niches 1,325 1,000 1,000 0.00%
Sale of Harbortown dockominiums 0.00%
Police miscellaneous 67,711 48,873 65,000 7,543 65,000 0.00%
Police impound fees 38,576 37,781 45,000 9,005 45,000 0.00%
Landlord's alert fee 1,630 1,800 1,465 1,800 0.00%
Fire protection-state property 83,093 82,087 85,000 85,000 0.00%
Zoning fees 9,325 13,915 10,000 2,470 10,000 0.00%
Clerk fees 2,586 1,391 5,000 287 5,000 0.00%
Clerk - passport fees 7,500 7,500 0.00%
!FT application fees 9,917 4,944 2,500 2,500 0.00%
Treasurer fees 26,934 33,708 22,000 1,935 22,000 0.00%
False alarm fees 16,439 18,806 10,000 150 10,000 0.00%
Miscellaneous cemetery income 21,224 24,118 21,000 2,986 21,000 0.00%
Housing commission reimbursement 23,503 0.00%
Senior transit program fees 8,261 7,986 8,000 1,309 8,000 0.00%
Fire miscellaneous 25,798 9,012 25,000 227 25,000 0.00%
Sanitation stickers 43,280 42,355 38,000 7,026 38,000 0.00%
Lot cleanup fees 96,998 74,584 70,000 14,024 70,000 0.00%
Reimbursements for mowings and demolitions 107,400 75,099 70,000 1,272 70,000 0.00%
Recre_§tion Qrogram fees 138,866 133,183 130,000 17,598 130,000 0.00%
$ 2,093,312 $ 1,971,996 $ 2,014,543 $ 338,217 $ 2,014,543 $ 0.00%
Interest and rental income
Interest $ 411,444 $ 331,923 $ 400,000 $ 18,300 $ 290,000 $ (110,000) -27.50% INTEREST RATES ARE EXTREMELY LOW
Flea market 25,269 22,157 27,000 27,000 0.00%
Farmers market 22,040 26,475 23,000 23,000 0.00%
City right of way rental 6,400 6,400 4,400 2,400 4,400 0.00%
Parking ramp rentals 46,819 22,069 32,000 19,839 32,000 0.00%
Mall parking 25,000 25,000 0.00% PAYMENTS FOR USE OF MALL PARKING
McGraft park rentals 55,518 53,758 54,443 1,750 54,443 0.00%
Other Qark rentals 31,919 28!081 32,200 8,071 32,200 0.00%
$ 599,409 $ 490,863 $ 573,043 $ 50,360 $ 488,043 $ (85,000} -14.83%_
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast • General Fund
General Fund Revenue Summary By Source
%Change
Original Budget Actual Thru Revised Budget Change From From 2002
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Estimate 2002 2002 Original Original Comments
Fines and fees
Income tax • penalty and interest $ 70,290 $ 95,916 $ 65,000 $ 33,824 $ 100,000 $ 35,000 53.85% AGGRESSIVE ENFORCEMENT
Late fees on current taxes 40,167 27,220 15,000 15,000 0.00%
Interest on late invoices 329 730 1,200 1,200 0.00%
Civil infraction fines 0.00%
Property transfer affidavit fines 6,400 1,900 1,000 1,000 0.00%
Parking fines 41,829 74,056 80,000 18,575 80,000 0.00%
Court fines 179,662 150,735 160,000 29 281 160,000 0.00%
$ 338,677 $ 350,557 $ 322,200 $ 81,680 $ 357,200 $ 35,000 10.86%
Other revenue
Sale of land and assets $ 350 $ $ 3,000 $ $ 3,000 $ 0.00%
Police sale and auction proceeds 3,214 3,706 4,000 4,000 0.00%
CDBG program reimbursements 391,573 322,587 280,000 317,435 37,435 13.37%
Contributions 68,993 33,592 11,000 1,075 11,000 0.00%
Muskegon County Community Foundation 7,000 7,000 0.00%
Miscellaneous reimbursements 4,000 4,000 0.00%
Misc~!~eous and sund!}'. 13,093 17,755 20,000 3,698 20,000 0.00%
$ 477,223 $ 377,640 $ 329,000 $ 4,773 $ 366,435 $ 37,435 11.38°".'<c
Other financing sources
Operating transfers in
Cemetery Perpetual Care 63,858 67,373 70,000 $ 70,000 0.00%
Criminal Forfeitures Fund 75,000 60,000 75,000 75,000 0.00%
Police Training Fund 36,286 31,142 15,000 15,000 0.00%
DOA for Administration 30,000 10,000 10,000 2,500 10,000 0.00%
Reese Playfield Fund 1,827 4,333 1,800 1,800 0.00%
RLF for Administration 5,000 5,000 1,250 5,000 0.00%
Hackley Park Improvement Fund 51 0.00%
Hackle}'.'. Park Memorial Fund 614 609 600 600 0.00%
$ 207,636 $ 178.457 $ 177,400 $ 3,750 $ 177 400 $ 0.00%
Total general fund revenues and
other sources $ 23,685,516 $ 23,446,611 $ 23,826,586 $ 2,332,880 $ 23,549,122 $ (277,464) ~1.16%
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Actual As
Original Budget Actual Thru %of Revised Change From
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Revised Estimate 2002 2002 Original Comments
I. Customer Value Added Activities
40301 Police Department
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 5,825,308 $ 5,803,534 $ 6,213,479 $ 1,236,564 20% $ 6,193,479 $ (20,000) VACANCY SAVINGS
5200 Operating Supplies 159,537 154,660 136,994 25,305 18% 136,994
5300 Contractual Services 953,985 951,902 892,201 245,783 28% 892,201
5400 other Expenses 54,242 54,675 31,621 22,977 45% 51,621 20,000 TWO NEW OFFICERS IN POLICE ACADEMY
5700 Gapllal Outlays 207,553 87,593 68,219 4,496 7% 68,219
590_0_ Other Financi_Q9_l,!$es N/A
$ 7,200,625 s 7,052,364 $ 7,342,514 $ 1,535,125 21% $ 7,342,514 $
$ 7,200,625 s 7,052,364 s 7,342,514 $ 1,535,125 21% $ 7,342,514 s
50336 Fire Department
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 2,708,005 $ 2,930,180 s 2,942,864 $ 673,304 23% $ 2,942,864 s
5200 Operating Supplies 97,561 92,307 100,000 17,261 17% 100,000
5300 Contractual Services 133,101 149,605 150,000 25,052 17% 150,000
5400 Other Expenses 10,051 12,785 20,000 5,224 26% 20,000
5700 Gapital Outlays 38,636 32,714 31,993 11,610 36% 31,993
590Q_ Other Financing (,J?es N/A
$ 2,987,354 $ 3,217,591 $ 3,244,857 $ 732,451 23% $ 3,244,857 $
50387 Fire Safety Inspections
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 623,329 $ 579,330 $ 596,927 s 124,371 20% $ 611,927 $ 15,000 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL INSPECTOR INCREASE
5200 Operating Supplies 17,135 25,077 32,500 3,923 12% 32,500
5300 Contractual Services 247,418 232,848 270,111 64,703 24% 270,111
5400 Other Expenses 11,070 8,109 15,000 1,533 10% 15,000
5700 Capital Outlays 9,838 15,215 6,500 227 3% 6,500
5900 Other Fi!]pncing Uses NIA
$ 908,790 s 860,579 $ 921,038 $ 194,757 21% $ 936,038 $ 15,000
$ 3,896,144 s 4,078,170 $ 4,165,895 $ 927,208 22% $ 4,180,895 $ 15,000
60523 General Sanitation
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 66,335 $ 67,901 s 75,369 $ 12,977 17% $ 75,369 $
5200 Operating Supplies 690 1,006 1,400 162 12% 1,400
5300 Contractual Services 1,308,314 1,351,420 1,432,223 215,564 15% 1,432,223
5400 Other Expenses 83 5,000 0% 5,000
5700 Capital Outlays 24,360 24,847 50,000 0% 50,000
5900 Other Flnancin Uses N/A
$ 1,399,699 $ 1,445,257 $ 1,563,992 s 228,703 15% $ 1,563,992 s
60528 Recycling
5100 Salaries & Benefits s $ $ N/A $ s
5200 Operating Supplies NIA
5300 Contractual Services 263,478 257,926 269,043 42,966 16% 269,043
5400 Other Expenses N/A
5700 Capital Outiays 3,305 1,500 0% 1,500
5900 Qtb_er Financing Uses N/A
_$_ 263,478 s 261,231 $ 270,543 $ 42,966 1s% s_ 270,543 $
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Actual As
Original Budget Actual Thru %of ReVised Change From
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Revised Estimate 2002 2002 Original Comments
60550 Stormwater Management
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ 64,260 $ 0% $ 64,260 $
5200 Operating Supplies 4,000 0% 4,000
5300 Contractual Services 62,665 14,960 24% 62,665
5400 Other Expenses 1,000 0% 1,000
5700 Capital Outlays 5,000 0% 5,000
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ $ $ 136,925 $ 14,960 11% S 136,925 s
60448 Streetlighting
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 10,601 $ 11,387 $ 8,329 $ 1,856 22% S 8,329 s
5200 Operating Supplies NIA
5300 Contractual Services 507,599 504,551 530,450 85,336 16% 530,450
5400 Other Expenses NIA
5700 Capital Outlays NIA
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
s 516,200 $ 515,938 $ 536,779 s 87,194 16% $ 536,779 $
60707 Senior Citizen Transit
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 44,554 $ 44,925 s 44,349 s 9,411 21% $ 44,349 $
5200 Operating Supplies NIA
5300 Contractual Services 5,450 7,100 5,650 2,730 47% 5,650
5400 Other Expenses NIA
5700 Capital Outlays NIA
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 50,004 s 52 025 s 50,199 $ 12,141 24% $ 50,199 $
60446 Community Event Support
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 113,420 s 77,841 $ 82,903 $ 3,653 4% $ 82,903 $
5200 Operating Supplies 14,743 1,971 3,000 0% 3,000
5300 Contractual Services 45,757 31,071 15,000 71 0% 15,000
5400 Other Expenses NIA
5700 Gapital Outlays NIA
590_0_ _ Other Financing 11_~~ _ NIA
$ 173,920 $ 110,883 $ 100,903 $ 3,724 4% $ 100,903 $
$ 2,405,301 $ 2,385,334 $ 2,661,341 $ 389,688 15% $ 2,661,341 $
70751 Parks Maintenance
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 410,877 $ 470,749 $ 556,037 $ 89,623 16% $ 556,037 $
5200 Operating Supplies 186,503 240,998 180,344 13,500 7% 180,344
5300 Contractual Services 509,593 596,720 491,277 69,241 14% 491,277
5400 Other Expenses 2,939 2,905 5,000 1,905 38% 5,000
5700 Capital Outlays 53,703 75,959 75,000 30,553 41% 75,000
5900 Othe_i:Financing Uses NIA
s 1,165,615 $ 1,387,331 $ 1,307,658 s 204,822 16% S 1,307,658 s
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Actual As
Original Budget Actual Thru ¾of Revised Change From
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Revised Estimate 2002 2002 Original Comments
70757 Mc Graft Park Maintenance
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 10,522 $ 5,030 s 15,622 $ 725 5% S 15,622 s
5200 Operating Supplies 3,862 4,918 4,250 579 14% 4,250
5300 Contractual Services 43,985 42,488 23,700 1,429 6% 23,700
5400 Other Expenses 210 238 200 0% 200
5700 Gapital Outlays 283 65 9,280 0% 9,280
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 58,862 $ 52,739 $ 53,052 s 2,733 5% S 53,052 s
70775 General Recreation Programs
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 117,149 $ 140,436 $ 182,701 $ 12,799 7% S 182,701 s
5200 Operating Supplies 31,912 43,244 33,000 12,190 37% 33,000
5300 Contractual Services 115,122 108,318 88,000 6,914 8% 88,000
5400 Other Expenses 2,969 4,068 3,786 944 25% 3,786
5700 Capital Outlays 4,344 288 NIA
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 271,496 $ 296 354 $ 307,487 $ 32,847 11% $ 307.487 $
70776 Inner City Recreation Programs
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 135,718 s 142,997 $ 142,897 $ 21,592 15% $ 142,897 $
5200 Operating Supplies 10,781 8,172 18,730 346 2% 18,730
5300 Contractual Services 29,995 27,246 41,685 3,300 8% 41,685
5400 Other Expenses 2,896 5,184 3,000 704 23% 3,000
5700 Gapital Outlays 95 NIA
5900 other Financln Uses NIA
s 179,390 $ 183,694 s 206,312 $ 25,942 13% $ 206,312 $
70276 Cemeteries Maintenance
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 184,070 $ 185,819 s 182,578 $ 40,199 22% $ 182,578 $
5200 Operating Supplies 13,440 21,908 25,000 259 1% 25,000
5300 Contractual Services 246,091 263,671 275,000 10,667 4% 275,000
5400 Other Expenses 568 1,199 1,000 100 10% 1,000
5700 Capital Outlays 19,930 33,975 24,835 7,803 66% 11,835 (13,000) MOWER PURCHASE DEFERRED FOR HIGHER
5900 Other Financing Uses NIA THAN EXPECTED BLDG RENOVATI_Q_N COSTS
$ 464,099 $ 506,572 $ 508,413 s 59,028 12% $ 495,413 $ (13,000)
70585 Parking Operations
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 13,182 $ 13,439 $ 13,654 s 3,378 25% $ 13,654 $
5200 Operating Supplies 2,316 2,476 2,924 219 7% 2,924
5300 Contractual Services 27,501 32,854 35,000 9,139 13% 71,000 36,000 MALL PARKING LOTS
5400 Other Expenses NIA
5700 Capital Outlays NIA
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
s 42,999 s 48,769 $ 51,578 $ 12,736 15% S 87,578 s 36,000
70771 Forestry
5100
5200
Salaries & Benefits s 89,755 $ 86,584 $ 115,260 $ 16,764 15% S 115,260 s
Operating Supplies 9,852 9,831 9,800 1,001 10% 9,800
5300 Contractual Services 16,843 14,244 14,000 2,521 18% 14,000
5400 Other Expenses 818 1,309 1,700 303 18% 1,700
5700 Capital Outlays 3,207 2,101 3,000 (11) 0% 3,000
5900 Oth_er Financing Uses NIA
$ 120,475 $ 114,069 s 143,760 $ 20 578 14% $ 143,760 $
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Actual As
Original Budget Actual Thru %of Revised Change From
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Revised Estimate 2002 2002 Original Comments
70863 Farmers' Market & Flea Market
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 27,185 $ 28,023 $ 32,331 $ 3,080 10% S 32,331 $
5200 Operating Supplies 591 860 1,000 0% 1,000
5300 Contractual Services 15,000 19,175 7,931 1,317 17% 7,931
5400 Other Expenses NIA
5700 Capital Outlays N/A
59Q_0 Other FJJ:@:icing Uses NIA
$ 42,776 $ 48,058 $ 41,262 $ 4,397 11%-S 41,262 $
$ 2,345,712 $ 2,637,586 $ 2,619,522 $ 363,083 14% S 2,642,522 $ 23,000
80799 Weed and Seed Program
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ N/A $ $
5200 Operating Supplies N/A
5300 Contractual Services 112 N/A
5400 Other Expenses N/A
5700 Capital Outlays N/A
5900 Other Financln Uses N/A
$ 112 $ $ s N/A $ $
80387 Environmental Services
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 150,456 $ 179,865 $ 182,793 s 34.411 19% $ 182,793 $
5200 Operating Supplies 9,525 9,023 6,300 2,232 35% 6,300
5300 Contractual Services 265,250 244,510 170,000 25,072 15% 170,000
5400 Other Expenses 333 1,633 3,000 281 9% 3,000
5700 Capital Outlays 4,135 6,556 12,000 2,818 23% 12,000
_§!;_lQQ__ Other Financ_il')g_ Uses N/A
s 429,699 s 441,587 s 374,093 $ 64,814 17% $ 374,093 $
s 429,811 s 441,587 s 374,093 $ 64,814 17% $ 374,093 $
10875 Other - Contributions to Outside Agencies
Muskegon Area Transit (MATS} $ 80,163 s 80,163 $ 80,500 $ 20,041 $ 80,500
Neighborhood Association Grants 27.443 34,063 40,000 34,475 40,000
Muskegon Area First (Moved from Planning for 2002) 45,516 45,516
Veterans Memorial Day Costs 7,324 7,535 8,500 8,500
WMSRDC • Muskegon Area Plan (MAP) 6,151 6,151 6,151
Institute for Healing Racism 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
Muskegon Area Labor Management (MALMC) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Sister Cities' Youth Travel 1,000
SPCA/Humane Society• Feral Cat Control 6,000 20,000 14,000 CONTRACT WITH COUNTY
Other 4,000 4,000
Contril:>_utlons To Outside Agencies $ 115,930 $ 132,912 $ 195,667 $ 58,516 28% $ 209,667 s 14,000
$ 115,930 $ 132,912 $ 195,667 $ 58,516 28% $ 209,667 s 14,000
Total Customer Value Added Activities s 16,393,523 $ 16,727,953 $ 17,359,032 s 3,338,434 19% $ 17,411,032 s 52,000
As a Percent of Total General Fund
Expenditures 73.7% 72.0% 70.4% 73.6% 71.4%
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Actual As
Original Budget Actual Thru %of Revised Change From
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Revised Estimate 2002 2002 Original Comments
II. Business Value Added Activities
10101 City Commission
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 56,917 $ 56,483 $ 57,889 $ 12,985 22% $ 57,889 $
5200 Operating Supplies 11,861 12,288 17,500 325 2% 17,500
5300 Contractual Services 30,541 36,894 44,000 14,942 34% 44,000
5400 Other Expenses 8,813 7,631 12,000 1,921 16% 12.000
5700 Capital Outlays 91 365 NIA
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 108,223 s 113,296 $ 131,389 $ 30,538 23% S 131,389 $
10102 City Promotions & Public Relations
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ s $ $ NIA S $
5200 Operating Supplies 10,000 0% 10,000
5300 Contractual Services 14,791 24,563 31,960 3,564 11% 31,960
5400 Other Expenses NIA
5700 Capital Outlays NIA
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 14,791 $ 24,563 $ 41,960 $ 3,564 8% $ 41,960 s
10172 City Manager
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 172,284 $ 168,180 s 169,350 s 39,075 23% $ 169,350 s
5200 Operating Supplies 2,564 1,651 3,500 83 2% 3,500
5300 Contractual Services 2,962 2,055 5,000 454 9% 5,000
5400 Other Expenses 4,247 2,149 5,000 1,057 21% 5,000
5700 Capital Outlays 1,814 3,500 29 1% 3,500
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 183,871 s 174,035 $ 186,350 $ 40,698 22% $ 186,350 $
10145 City Attorney
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ s $ $ N/A $ $
5200 Operating Supplies 480 833 1,000 0% 1,000
5300 Contractual Services 384,201 457,739 382,734 94,931 22% 425,000 42,266 TOWNSHIP WATER AND SEWER LAWSUITS AND
5400 Other Expenses NIA SMARTZONE, FISHERMAN'S LANDING PROJECTS
5700 Capital Outlays NIA
5900 Other Fir,.3ncing Uses NIA
$ 384,681 $ 458,572 $ 383,734 $ 94,931 22% $ 426,000 $ 42,266
$ 691,566 $ 770,466 s 743,433 s 169,731 22% $ 785,699 s 42,266
20173 Administration
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 137,659 $ 120,324 s 122,783 $ 30,297 25% $ 122,783 s
5200 Operating Supplies 2,295 1,784 3,450 180 5% 3,450
5300 Contractual Services 15,871 15,734 21,150 742 4% 21,150
5400 Other Expenses 12,278 7,230 13,628 1,434 11% 13,628
5700 Capital Outlays 581 1,632 3,000 0% 3,000
_?900 Other Fi_11ancing Uses NIA
$ 168,684 s 146,704 $ 164,011 $ 32,653 20% $ 164,011 $
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast -General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Actual As
Original Budget Actual Thru %of Revised Change From
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Revised Estimate 2002 2002 Original Comments
20228 Affirmative Action
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 69,370 $ 72,256 s 81,875 s 17,183 21% $ 81,875 $
5200 Operating Supplies 506 1,713 2,300 254 11% 2,300
5300 Contractual Services 2,334 1,759 1,500 202 13% 1,500
5400 Other Expenses 2,801 2,913 4,431 1,233 28% 4,431
5700 Capital Outlays 118 649 1,000 0% 1,000
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 75,129 $ 79,290 $ 91,106 $ 18,872 21% $ 91,106 s
20744 Julia Hackley Internships
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 7,482 s 10,692 $ 7,000 $ 0% S 7,000 s
5200 Operating Supplies 718 NIA
5300 Contractual Services 711 NIA
5400 Other Expenses 20 NIA
5700 Capital Outlays NIA
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 8,911 $ 10.712 $ 7,000 $ 0% S 7,000 $
20215 City Clerk & Elections
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 218,883 $ 208,602 s 226,515 $ 47,056 21% $ 226,515 $
5200 Operating Supplies 32,549 35,327 17,000 4,141 24% 17,000
5300 Contractual Services 28,284 31,458 44,530 8,018 18% 44,530
5400 Other Expenses 5,420 7,136 6,000 394 7% 6,000
5700 Capital Outlays 2,551 5,199 3,450 416 12% 3,450
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 267,687 $ 287,722 $ 297.495 s 60,025 20% $ 297,495 $
20220 Civil Service
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 130,015 s 132,405 $ 153,115 $ 33,668 22% $ 153,115 $
5200 Operating Supplies 6,339 17,111 10,750 1,527 14% 10,750
5300 Contractual Services 39,839 22,799 26,815 5,953 22% 26,815
5400 Other Expenses 42,287 12,336 5,800 388 7% 5,800
5700 Capital OuUays 762 8,600 1,000 0% 1,000
_5900_ Other FiQ<l_ncing Uses NIA
$ 219,242 $ 193,251 $ 197,480 $ 41,536 21% S 197,480 s
$ 759,653 $ 717,679 $ 757,092 $ 153,086 20% S 757,092 s
30202 Finance Administration
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 259,785 $ 267,254 s 276,780 $ 69,984 25% $ 276,780 $
5200 Operating Supplies 9,334 9,554 9,900 1,930 19% 9,900
5300 Contractual Services 64,594 99,977 101,100 45,767 45% 101,100
5400 Other Expenses 2,385 2,348 2,700 106 4% 2,700
5700 Capital Outlays 4,586 2,085 3,000 1,766 59% 3,000
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA
$ 340,684 s 381,218 $ 393,480 $ 119,553 30% $ 393,480 $
30209 Assessing Services
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 5,013 $ 6,759 $ 7,668 $ 2,962 39% $ 7,668 $
5200 Operating Supplies NIA
5300 Contractual Services 340,213 367,367 396,754 0% 396,754
5400 Other Expenses 80 45 100 60 60% 100
5700 Capital Outlays NIA
5900 Ot~er Financing Uses NIA
s 345,306 $ 374,171 s 404,522 $ 3,022 1% -$ 404,522 $
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast General Fund
R
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Actual As
Original Budget Actual Thru %of Revised Change From
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Revised Estimate 2002 2002 Original Comments
30205 Income Tax Administration
5100 s s
'
Salaries & Benefits 212,880 $ 213,846 $ 234,090 41,649 18% $ 234,090
5200 Operating Supplies 18,875 24,678 25,025 3,900 16% 25,025
5300 Contractual Services 34,550 34,092 38,250 7,897 21% 38,250
5400 Other Expenses 1,288 1,648 3,000 151 5% 3,000
5700 Capital Outlays 2,180 206 4,000 0% 4,000
5900 Other Financin Uses N/A
$ 269,773 $ 274,470 $ 304,365 s 53,597 18% $ 304,365 s
30253 City Treasurer
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 251,881 $ 236,759 $ 272,699 $ 59,320 22% $ 272,699 s
5200 Operating Supplies 38,165 35,489 38,000 5,553 15% 38,000
5300 Contractual Services 55,546 49,210 34,130 4,543 13% 34,130
5400 Other Expenses 1,264 900 1,200 530 44% 1,200
5700 Capital Outlays 7,298 4,281 3,900 6,162 158% 3,900
5900 Other Financin Uses N/A
$ 354,154 s
30248 Information Systems Administration ' 326,639
'
349,929 $ 76,108 22% $ 349,929
5100 Salaries & Benefits s
' '
167,381 21% $
5200
5300
Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
6,695
38,925
182,403
2,024
72,769
' 237,076
5,000
49,404
'
50,739
734
4,788
15%
10%
237,076
5,000
49,404
5400 Other Expenses 10,689 12,457 9,268 256 3% 9,268
5700 Capital Outlays 52,283 53,828 47,195 11,442 24% 47,195
5900 Other Financing Uses NIA
$ 275,973 $ 323.481 $ 347,943 $ 67,959 20% $ 347,943 s
$ 1,585,890 $ s
60265 City Hall Maintenance
1,679,979
' 1,800,239 $ 320,239 18% $ 1,800,239
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 63,273 s 64,853 s 62,526 $ 14,083 23% $ 62,526 s
5200 Operating Supplies 11,926 12,457 14,650 2,712 19% 14,650
5300 Contractual Services 184,471 214,595 190,000 31,931 17% 190,000
5400 Other Expenses 395 598 500 0% 500
5700 Gapilal Outlays 3,422 253 12,996 1,277 10% 12,996
5900 _QtJ:i~!. Financing Uses N/A
s s s
'
$
263,487
263,487 s
292,756
292,756 s
280,672
280,672
$
$
50,003
50,003
18% $
18% $
280,672
280,672 s
80400 Planning, Zoning and Economic Development
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 395,554 $ 387,005 $ 427,548 $ 81,553 19% $ 427,548 $
5200 Operating Supplies 16,283 19,455 15,700 1,777 11% 15,700
5300 Contractual Services 78,924 87,314 50,734 23,478 46% 50,734
5400 Other Expenses 7,746 9,751 9,000 1,939 22% 9,000
5700 Capital Outlays 3,018 3,644 3,000 1,891 63% 3,000
5!:)00 Other Firiancing Uses N/A
'
$
501,525
501,525
$
$
507,169
507,169
$
$
505,982
505,982
$
$
110,638
110,638
22% $
22% $
505,982
505,982
$
$
Total Business Value Added Activities $ 3,802,121 $ 3,968,049 $ 4,087,418 $ 803,697 19% $ 4,129,684 $ 42,266
As a Percent of Total General Fund
Expenditures 17.1% 17.1% 16.6% 17.7% 16.9%
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - General Fund
General Fund Expenditure Summary By Function
Actual As
Original Budget Actual Thru %of Revised Change From
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 March 2002 Revised Estimate 2002 2002 Original Comments
II. Fixed Budget Items
30999 Transfers To Other Funds
Major Street Fund s s $ 200,000 $ 50,000 50% $ 100,000 $ (100,000) REDUCED TO OFFSET REVENUE SHORTFALLS
Local Street Fund 620,000 820,000 850,000 212,500 25% 850,000
Budget Stabilization Fund 250,000 100,000 NIA (100,000) BSF WAS FULLY FUNDED IN 2001
L.C. Walker Arena Fund (Operating Subsidy) 346,000 301,000 271,837 67,959 25% 271,837
Public Improvement Fund (Fire Equipment Reserve) 220,000 150,000 150,000 37,500 25% 150,000
State Grants Fund (Beachwood Park Grant Match) 105,000 0% 105,000
MOD State Rehab Loan Fund 22,810 NIA
TIFA Debt SeNice Fund NIA
Tree Replacement 2,723 NIA
s 1,211,533 s 1,521,000 $ 1,676.837 s 367,959 25% $ 1,476,837 $ (200,000):
30851 General Insurance s 249,757 s 236,222 $ 242,000 s 0% $ 295,000 $ 53,000 HIGHER COSTS DUE TO POOR EXPERIENCE
30906 Debt Retirement 407,835 375,101 209,406 7,097 3% 209,406
10891 Contingency and Bad Debt Expense 142,954 268,110 400,000 2,907 1% 400,000
90000 Major Capital Improvements 24,934 139,543 670,000 18,578 4% 450,500 (219,500) SEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DETAIL
Total Fixed-Budget Items s 2,037,013 s 2,539,976 $ 3,198,243 s 396,541 14% $ 2,831,743 $ (366,500)
As a Percent of Total General Fund
Expenditures 9.2% 10.9% 13.0% 8.7% 11.6%
Total General Fund S 22,232,657 s 23,235,978 $ 24,644,694 s 4,538,672 19% $ 24,372,460 $ (272,234)
Recap: Total General Fund By Expenditure Object
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 12,678,843 s 12,895,861 $ 13,789,267 s 2,785,261 20% $ 13,784,267 $ (5,000)
5200 Operating Supplies 719,038 790,815 733,017 100,093 14% 733,017
5300 Contractual Services 6,559,992 6,991,218 7,029,865 1,135,400 16% 7,175,131 145,266
5400 Other Expenses 185,789 159,350 162,934 43,440 24% 182,934 20,000
5700 Capital Outlays 469,627 502,633 1,043,368 99,422 12% 810,868 (232,500)
_§.@.O_O All Other Financing Uses 1,619,368 1,896,101 1,886,243 375,056 22% 1,686,243 (200,000)
Total General Fund s 22,232,657 s 23,235,978 $ 24,644,694 s 4,538,672 19% $ 24,372,460 $ (272,234)
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru Marc/1 Actual As % Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
202 Major Streets and State Trunklines Fund
Available Fund Balance. BOY
Revenues
' J,585,170 $ 2,989,718
' 1,726,109
'
2,361,992
'
2,361,992
'
635,883"-
' 1,493,043
Special assessments s
Federal grants
State grants
' 221,610
3,154,271 '
228,652
3,331,781
186,000
200,000
586,000
6,060,000
$ $ 200,000 $
586,000
6,060,000
$ 200,000
586,000
6,060,000
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
LAKETON ST/ROBERTS ST/SEAWAY IND PARK PROJECTS
SHORELINE DR ($5.8 Mll)/BLACK CREEK/SOUTHERN PROJECTS
State sharerj revenue 2,590,185 2,513,944 2,865,941 194,568 2,865,941 2,865,941 0.00%
Interest income 214,103 159,976 60,000 12,239 60,000 60,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 200,000 50,000 100,000 (100,000) 200,000 100,00% GENERAL FUND TRSFR - REDUCED DUE TO BUDGET SHORTFALL
Other 514,262 283,125 75.000 4,754 75 000 75,000 0.00%
s 6,694 431 $ 6,703.478 s 10.046,941 s 261,561 $ 9,946,941 $ (100 000) $ 10,046 941 1.01%
60900 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 649,222 $ 596,655 $ 873,257 s 166,740 19% $ 873,257 $ $ 873,257 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 105,439 195,361 166,200 58,255 35% 166,200 166,200 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 915.522 894.483 762,970 212,661 28% 762,970 762,970 0.00%
5'00 Other Expenses S,,45 5,589 4,000 '50 11% 4,000 4,000 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 1,635 NIA 0.00%
~!lQQ_ Other Financing Uses 905,964 610,523 626,463 0% 626463 626 463 0,00% DEBT SERVICE
2,581,692 s 2,304,246 $ 2.432 890 $ 438106 18% s 2.432 890 s s 2.432,890 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200
5300
5700
Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
~talOutla
$
4,708,191
s
5,026,958
$
8,755,000
$
78,932 ,.
NIA s
8,383,000
s
(372,000}
s
8,755,000
0.00%
4.44% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
NIA 0,00%
$ s
4 708191
7 289 883 '
$
5 026 958
7,331,204 $
8,755 000
11,187 890
$
$
78,932
517,038
1%
5%
$
$
8,383,000
10,815,890
(372,000) S
s
8,755.000
11,187,890
4.44%
3.44%
Available Fund Balance. EOY $ 2,989,718 $ 2,361,992 $ 585,160 $ 2,106,515 $ 1,493,043 s 907,883 $ 352,094
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
203 Local Streets Fund
Available Fund Balance. BOY s 176 s 122,966 s 319,647 s 156,747 s 156,747 $ (162,900) $ 319,647
Revenues
Special assessments s 76,570 s 120,108 s 75,000 s s 75,000 $ $ 75,000 0.00%
Federal grants 31,073 30,000 30,000 30,000 0.00% EDA GRANT FOR SEAWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK
State grants 48.467 24,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0,00% SHORELINE DRIVE
State share<i revenue 639,505 645,381 666,663 53,542 666,663 666,663 0,00%
Interest income 11,210 12,845 10,000
Operating transfers in
Other
870,000
20 082
820,000
764
850,000
20,000
"'
212,500
'80
10,000
850,000
20,000
10,000
850,000
20,000
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
GENERAL FUND TRANSFER
1.696,907 $ 1,623,098 $ 1 751 663 s 266,534 s 1.751,663 s $ 1 751 663 0.00%
60900 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 437,736 $ 431,139 $ 427,175 $ 128,075 30% $ 427,175 s $ 427,175 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 107,551 112,034 84,000 28,575 34% 84,000 84,000 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 589,182 508,360 582,956 149,757 26% 582,956 582,956 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 2,236 1,695 1,000 (398) -40% 1,000 1,000 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays NIA 0.00%
~~_Q_0_ Other Financing Uses 63.143 NIA 0.00%
1,199 850 $ 1 053,228 $ 1,095 131 $ 306,009 28% $ 1,095,131 s $ 1,095131 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operafaig Supplies $ $ $ $ NIA $ $ $ 0.00%
~ - Contractual Services 374,267 536,089 870,000 149,776 20% 756,000 [114,000] 870,000 15.08% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
$ 374,267 $ 536,089 $ 870,000 $ 149,776 20% $ 756000 s (114,000) $ 870.000 15.08%
$ 1 574117 $ 1,589,317 $ 1.965131 $ 455 785 2$% $ 1,851,131 $ 1,965131 6.16%
Available Fund Balance. EDY $ 122.966 $ 156,747 $ 106.179 $ (32,504) $ 57,279 $ !48.900) $ 106,179
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As % Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
230 Enterprise Community Fund
Available Fund Balance. BOY $ $ $ $ $ $
Revenues
Special assessments $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00%
Federal grants 633 85,494 180,000 180,000 180,000 0.00%
State shared reveriue 0.00%
Charges for services 0.00%
Interest income 0.00%
Operating transfers in 0.00%
Other 0.00%
633 $ 85 494
60900 Operating Expenditures
' 180 000 $
'
180,000 $ $ 180,000 0.00%
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ N/A $ $ $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies NIA 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 633 85,494 180,000 1,439 >% 180,000 180,000 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses N/A 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays N/A 0.00%
5900 Other Financi Uses N/A 0.00%
$ 633 $ 85.494 s 180,000 $ 0% $
'
1,439 180 000 180,000
90000 Project Expenditures
' 0.00%
$200 Operating Supplies $ $ $ $ N/A $ $ $ 0,00%
5300 Contractual Services N/A 0.00%
633 '' 85.494
$
$ 180,000 '
$ 1,439
N/A
" s
$
180,000 ' $
' 180,000
0,00%
0.00%
Avai@__ble Fund Balance. EQ!'._ $ $ $ $ (1,439) s
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Es~mate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Est mate 2002 Revised Comments
254 LC. Walker Arena Fund
Available Fund Balance. BOY $ 3,426 s 3.861 $ 17,945 $ 19].33 $ 19,133 s 1,188 $ 17,945
Revenues
Special assessments $ s $ $ $ s $ 0.00%
State grants 0.00%
State shared revenue 0.00%
Charges for services 505,229 561,449 590,000 262,216 590,000 590,000 0.00%
Interest income 24 500 190 500 500 0.00%
Operating transfers in 346,000 301,000 271,837 67,959 271,837 271,837 0.00% GENERAL. FUND TRANSFER- OPERATING SUBSIDY
01!1er 3,848 520 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.00%
$ 855 101 $ 862,969 s 867 337 s 330 365 $ 867 337 $ $ 867 337 0.00%
70805 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 11,120 $ 11,543 s 11,837 s 3,067 26% s 11,837 $ $ 11,837 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies N'A 0_00%
5300 Contractual Services 842,086 835,912 870,000 240,553 28% 870,000 870,000 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses NIA 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 1,460 242 NIA 0.00%
5900 othe~ Financing Uses NIA 0.00%
8.54 666 s 847 697 $ 881,837 $ 243 620 s
90000 Project Expenditures
28%
' 881 837 $ 881 837 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies s s $ $ NIA $ $ s 0.00%
~ - Contractual Services NIA 0.00%
$ $ $ NIA $ $
854,6"
' 847,697 $ 881 837 $ 243,620 28% $ 881,837 's 881,837
0.00%
0.00%
Available Fund Balance. EOY $ 3~ $ 19,133 $ 3,445 $ 105,878 $ 4,633 s 1,188 $ 3,445
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 ActuaI2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estjmate 2002 Revised Comments
403 Sidewalk Improvement Fund
Ava!lable Fund Balance. BOY $ 63,295 $ 613,738 s 41,325 s - (95,006) $ (95,006) $ (136,331) $ 41,325
Revenues
Special assessments $ 459,927 $ 239,318 s 500,000 s $ 500,000 $ $ 500,000 0.00%
Federal grants 0.00%
Staie shared revenue 0.00%
Charges for services 0.00%
Interest income 39,198 60,374 20,000 42S 20,000 20,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 97,219 100,000 100,000 100,000 0.00%
o•~ 826,068 800 000 800 000 800,000 0.00% PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT BONDS
s 1.422.412 $ 299,692 s 1.420.000 s 425 $ 1 420,000 $ $ 1 420,000 0.00%
30906 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits s $ s s NIA $ $ $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies NIA 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services NIA 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses NIA 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays NIA 0.00%
5900 Other__financing Uses 14M14 373.443 401.612 0% 401,612 401.612 0.00% DEBT SERVICE
s 143.014 $ 373.443 s 401.612 $ 0% $ 401.612 $ $ 401.612 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Opera~ng Supplies s s s s NIA $ $ $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 568.030 622,656 600,000 4,781 2% 300,000 (300,000) 600,000 100.00% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
5400 Other Expenses 6,520 12.337 NIA 0.00%
5900 Othei:__Bnancing Uses 154A05 NIA 0.00%
728 955 s 634 993 $ 600.000 $ 4,781 2% $ 300 000 $ {300 000) $ 600.000 100.00%
871 969 s 1 008.436 $ 1.001.612 4.781 $ 701.612
Avai_!;lble Fund Balance· EOY $ 613,738 s )95,006) $ 459.713
$
$ (99,362)
" s 623.382 $ 163.669
$
$
1.001.612
459.713
42.76%
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Es~mate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Origk,al Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
404 Public Improvement Fund
Available Fund Balance. BOY
Revenues
$ 1.354,812
'
421,441
' 1,400,338 $ 1,564,898 $ 1,564,898 $ 164,560 $ 1,466:~~!f
Special assessments
'
$ $ $ $ $ $ 0,00%
Pmpertytaxes 0.00%
Federal grants 295,200 26.450 295200 295,200 0.00% EDA GRANT FOR SEAWAY INDUSTRIAL f'>ARK
Contributions 1,200,000 0.00%
Sales of Property 148,053 76,257 100,000 20.499 100,000 100,000 0.00%
Interest income 51,375 31,890 25,000 8,609 25,000 25,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 220,000 450,000 150,000 37,500 150,000 150,000 0.00% GENERAL FUND TRANSFER- FIRE EQUIPMENT RESERVE
Other 35 643 31,859 0.00%
455,071 $ 1,790,006 570.200 $ 93,058
'
$
30936 Operating Expenditures
570.200 $
' 570 200 0.00%
5100 Salaries & Benefits
' '
$ $ $ NIA
'
$ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies NIA 0,00%
5300 Contractual Services 26,450 NIA 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses NIA 0.00%
5700 Capital Ou~ays NIA 0.00%
5900 Other Financiog Uses 105,000 NIA 0.00%
105,000
90000 Project Expenditures
' $ $ 26450 NIA
' ' ' 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies
' ' '
$ $ $ $ NIA 0.00%
$300 Contractual Services 696,960 53,375 3,144 NIA 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses NIA 0.00%
$700 Caeital Outla:i§; 586 482 593,174 224.000 61852 28% 224 000 224,000 0.00% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
1,283.442 $ 646,549 224,000 $ 64,996 224,000 224,000
'' ' '
$ 29% 0.00%
'
1,388.442 646,549 5 224,000 5 91 446 4'% 224 000 $ 224,000 0.00%
Available Fund Balance - EOY
' 421,441
'
1,564,898 $ 1,7:l_§.~ $ 1,566,510
'
1,911,098
'
164,560 $ 1,746,538
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
474 Coastal Zone Management Fund
Available Fund Balance - BOY $ 2,627 s 2,627 $ 2,627 $ $ $ (2,627) S
Revenues
Special assessments $ $ $ $ $ s s 0.00%
State grants 0.00%
Federal grants 23,480 0.00%
Sales of Property 0.00%
Interest income 0.00%
Operating transfers in 20,853 0.00%
Other 0.00%
s 44,333 $ $ $ $ s 0.00%
30936 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ $ $ NIA $ s $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies NIA 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services NIA 0.00%
'400 Other Expenses WA 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays NIA 0.00%
5900 Qther Financin Uses NIA 0.00%
s $ $ WA $ s $ 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operating Supplies $ s $ $ NIA $ s $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 46,960 3,143 NIA 0.00%
S700 Caeital Outlal:'..l! WA 0.00% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
$ s 46 960 $ $ 3.143 NIA $ s $ 0.00%
$ s 46,960 $ $ 3143 NIA $ $ 0.00%
Available,_f'_~nd Balance" EOY $ 2.627 s $ 2,627 $ lJ.143) $ s (2,627) $
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From2001
Actual2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Origin!"ll Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
482 State Grants Fund
Available Fund Balance. BOY ,-
Revenues
' ' ' '
Special assessments s s
State grants
Federal grants
' 275,965
73,386
' 363,056
406,614
2,778,099
$
105,949 2,778,099
$ $
2,778,099
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Sales of Property 0.00%
Interest income 0.00%
Operating transfers in 601,173 693,281 346,000 346,000 346,000 0.00% LOCAL MATCHES
Other 1 000,000 1 000,000 1,000,000 0.00% CORE COMMUNITIES GRANT
$ 950 524 $ s 4,124 099 s
30936 Operating Expenditures
1.462,951
' 105,949 4 124 099
' ' 4124 099 0.00%
5100 Salaries & Benefits s s s
5200
5300
Operating Supplies
Contractual Services
' ' N'A
NIA
NIA
' ' 0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
S400 Other Expenses NIA 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays NIA 0,00%
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA 0.00%
$ $ s
90000 Project Expenditures
' NIA $
' ' 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies s s s
5300
5700
Contractual Services
Caeital Outla1-1
950,524 1.283,344
179,607
' 4,124.099
37,895
48,643
NIA
NIA
1%
$
4124,099
' $
4124 099
0.00%
0.00%
0.00% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
s s
''
950524 1,462 951 4124,099 86 538 4,124 099
'' '
$ 2% $ 4,124,099 0,00%
s 950,524 s 1.462 951 4,124,099 s 86.538 2% 4,124,099 $ 4,124,099 0.00%
Available Fund Balance. EOY $ s
' ' 19.411 $ $ $
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual k. % Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
594 Marina & Launch Ramp Fund
Available Cash Balance. BOY $ 62,225 I 2,292 s 126,329 $ 66,148 $ 66,148 $ (60,181) S 126,~2_9
Revenues
Special assessments $ s s
State grants
State shared revenue
' 159,150 122,500
$
' 122,500
$
122,500
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Charges for services 273,456 292,144 276,600 90,642 276,600 276,600 0,00%
Interest income 5,184 1,544 5,000 353 5,000 5,000 0,00%
Operating transfers in 0.00%
Other 10,797 2,128 0.00%
s 289 437 $ 454966 s 404,100 $ 90 995 $ 404100 s s 404,100 0.00%
70756 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 74,283 s 92,244 $ 114,172 $ 10,015 9% s 114,172 s s 114,172 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 17,771 7,942 9,650 360 4% 9,650 9,650 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 143,006 127.477 100,223 11,934 12% 100,223 100,223 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 2,307 545 1,000 0% 1,000 1,000 0.00%
5700 Capital Ou~ays 1,350 560 NIA 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses (841) NIA 0.00%
Other Cash Uses (e.g . Debt
Pr~)_ 5,126 NIA 0.00%
237,876 s 223 643 $ 225 045 $ 22,309 10% s 225,045 s s 225 045 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operating Supplies $ s $ $ WA s s $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 111.494 167,467 245,000 90,070 37% 245,000 245,000 0.00% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
~zoo Capital Outl_a_yi;_ WA 0.00%
111.494 s 167.467 $ 245,000 $ 90,070 37% s 245,000 s $ 245,000 0.00%
349.370 s 391,110 $ 470,045 $ 112 379 24% s 470,045 s 470,045 0.00%
Available Cash Balance. EQ!____ $ 2,292 $ 66,148 $ 60,384 $ 44,764 s 203 s (60,181) $ 60,384
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Actwal2000 Actual 2001
Original Budget
Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised ,oo,
Actl.lal Thru March Actual As% Revised Estimate Change From
2002 Original
Original Budget
Estimate 2002
From 2001
Revised Comments
584 Municipal Golf Course Fund
Available Cash Balance. BOY $ 1,564,213 s 1,151,296 $ 567,480 $ 492,650 $ 492,650 s ~-c.-1 s 567,480
Revenues
Special assessments $ s $ $ $ $ s 0.00%
State grants 0.00%
State shared revenue 0.00%
Charges for services 0.00%
Interest income 86,159 55,488 40,000 3,033 40,000 40,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 0.00%
Other 0.00%
$ 86 159 $ 55,488 s 40,000 s 3,033 $ ,0000 $ $ '° 000 0.00%
70542 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Beriefils $ $ s s NIA $ $ $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies NIA 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 2,903 NIA 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses NIA 0.00%
5700 Capital Ou~ays NIA 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses 496,173 714,134 241,000 0% 241,000 241,000 0.00% LOCAL MATCH FOR TRAIL PROJECT GRANTS
Other Cash Uses (e.g., Debt
f:[incip~ NIA 0.00%
499 076 $ 714,134 $ 241 000 $ 0% s 241 000 $ $ 241 000 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5,00 Operating Supplies $ s $ $ NIA s $ $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services NIA 0.00%
5700 Cag}tal Outla~ NIA 0.00%
s $ $ NIA s s $ 0.00%
499076 s 714134 $ 241.000 $ 0% s 241,000 $ 241.000 0.00%
Available Cash Balar,_~ • EOY $ 1,151,296 s 492,650 $ 366,480 $ 495.683 $ 291,550 s (74,830) S 366,480
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual k, % Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
661 Equipment Fund
- -
Available Cash Balance - BOY s 499,092 $ 380,984 $ 399,649 s 367,851 $ 367,851 s (31,798) $ 399,649
Revenues
Special assessments s $ $ s $ s $ 0.00%
State grants 0.00%
State shared revenue 0.00%
Charges for services 1,950,310 1,985,638 1,950,000 585,579 1,950,000 1,950,000 0.00%
Interest income 27,193 21,873 40,000 2,217 40,000 40,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 0.00%
oc~ 193,377 127,412 100,000 9,118 100.000 100,000 0.00%
s 2170 880 $ 2134 923 $ 2 090,000 s 596,914 $ 2,090,000 $ $ 2 090,000 0.00%
60932 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 364,899 $ 446,604 $ 403,801 s 96,687 24% $ 403,801 s $ 403,801 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 606,768 649,641 561,230 77,590 1'% 561,230 561,230 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 393,192 459,869 404,596 77,174 19% 404.596 404,596 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 3,357 4,070 3,500 1,668 '8% 3,500 3.500 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 872,983 713,321 766.450 226,951 30% 766,450 766,450 0.00% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
5900 Other Financing Uses N/A 0.00%
Other Cash Uses (e.g .. Debt
_Pring_Q_aj)_ 47,789 125,449 NIA 0.00%
2J88 988 $ 2148 056 $ 2139577 s 480,270 22% $ 2,139.577 $ $ 2139577 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operating Supplies $ $ $ s N/A $ s $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services N/A 0.00%
5700 CaQital Outr~ N/A 0.00%
$ $ s N/A $ $ $ 0.00%
2688 988 $ 2 148 056 $ 2139,577 s 480,270 22% $ 2,139,577 $ 2139,577 0.00%
Available Cash Balance - EQY___ $ 380,984 $ 367,851 $ 350,072 $ 484,495 $ 318.274 $ (31,798) $ 350,072
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
642 Public Service Building Fund
Available Cash Balance. BOY $ 34,173 s (200,038) $ (118,928) $ p10,1s1i $ (110,757) S 8,171 $ 1118ji8)
Revenues
Special assessments $ $ $ $ s $ $ 0.00%
State grants 0.00%
State shared revenue 0.00%
Charges for services 460,000 557,060 557,060 153,192 557,060 557,060 0.00%
Interest income 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 0.00%
Other 427 0.00%
460.427 $ 557 060 s 55M60 $ 153192 s 558,060 $ $ 558 060 0.00%
60442 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 174,399 $ 178,227 s 177,609 s 39,376 22% $ 177,609 $ $ 177,609 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 19,767 22,582 26,950 6,224 23% 26,950 26,950 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 215,070 193.076 222,268 43,759 20% 222,268 222,268 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 10,956 (1,951} 2,000 [80) -4% 2.000 2,000 0.00%
5700 Capital OuUays 18,961 68,738 24,187 NIA 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses NIA 0.00%
Other Cash Uses and Adjustments
~gbtPrincipal 21,076 7.107 NIA 0.00%
$ 418 077 $ 467 779 $ 428.827 $ 113 466 26% $ 428 827 $ $ 428.827 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operating Supplies s $ $ $ NIA $ $ s 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 276,561 159,350 45,690 29% 159,350 159,350 0.00% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
5700 Ca ital 01.!tfa NIA 0.00%
s 276.561 s $ 159.350 $ 45 690 2'% $ 159,350 $ s 159,350 0.00%
$ 694 638 s 467 779 $ 588.177 $ 159156 27% $ 588177 s 588.177 0.00%
Ava_ilable Cash Balance ~_§:0..!_ s (200,038) S (110,757) $ (149.045) $ (116,721) $ (140.874) S 8,171 s (149.045)
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revlsed Comments
643 Engineering Services Fund
Available Cash Balance. BOY $ 86,178 $ 117.697 $ 140,189 $ 144,167 $ 144,167 $ 3,978 $ 140,189
Revenues
Special assessments $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00%
State grants 0.00%
State shared revenue 0,00%
Charges for services 478,738 554,621 656,756 113,206 656,756 656,756 0.00%
Interest income 5,749 6,378 10,000 810 10,000 10,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 0.00%
Other 24 762 28,005 183 0.00%
$ 509.249 $ 589,004 $ 666,756 $ 114,199 $ 666,756 $ $ 666,756 0.00%
60447 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 348,155 $ 405,175 $ 494,560 $ 82,468 17% $ 494,560 $ $ 494,560 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 15,188 18,746 20,530 7,234 35% 20,530 20,530 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 107,040 127,790 134,612 29,158 22% 134,612 134,612 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 3,964 1,844 6,300 184 3% 6,300 6,300 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 22,025 14,568 16,650 1.980 12% 16,650 16,650 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses NIA 0.00%
Other Cash Uses and Adjustments
e.g .. Debt Princii;ialL____ 19.413 5,967 NIA 0.00%
476,959 $ 562,156 $ 672.652 $ 121,024 18% s 672 652 $ $ 672.652 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operating Supplies $ $ $ s NIA $ $ $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 771 378 378 NIA 0.00%
fil:QQ___ __ Ca11ital Cutia~ NIA 0.00%
771 $ 378 $ $ 378 NIA $ $ $ 0.00%
$
'
477 730 562534 672.652 $ 121 402 18% $ 672.652 $ 672.652 0.00%
Available Cash Balance. EOY $ 117,697 $ 144,167 $ 134,293 $ 136,964 $ 138,271 $ 3,978 $ 134,293
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As % Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
677 General Insurance Fund
Available Cash Balance. BOY $ 1,193,782 s 935,251 s 1,038,212 s 855,366
Revenues
' 855,366 $ (182,846) $ 1,038,212
Special assessments $ s s s
State grants
State shared revenue
' $ $ 0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Charges for services 1,978,797 2,169,113 2,634,320 520,593 2,634,320 2,634,320 0.00%
Interest income 55,393 33.408 40,000 4,543 40,000 40,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 784,995 881,596 900,000 900,000 900,000 0.00% TRANSFER FROM PENSION FUNDS FOR RETIREE HEALTHCARE
.illtl!l'r_ 117 275 11,750 75,000 1,114 75,000 75 000 0.00%
$ 2 936 460 $ 3,095,867 $ 3 649,320 s 526,250 s 3.649.320 $ $ 3,649,320 Q.00%
30851 Operating Expenditures
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 5,712 $ 42,455 44,910 $ 64,686 144% 44,910 $ 44,910 0,00%
5200 Operating Supplies 47S 922 1,000 63 6% 1,000 1,000 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 3,072,981 3,243,323 3,534,320 796,134 23% 3,534,320 3,534,320 0.00%
5'00 Other Expenses 461 2,075 2,000 118 6% 2,000 2,000 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 2.405 2,000 315 16% 2,000 2,000 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses NIA 0.00%
Other Cash Uses and Adjustments
e.g .. Debt Princii:ial) 115,362 115.428 NIA 0.00%
3,194,991 $ 3 175,752 $ 3 584,230 $ 861,316 24% $ 3,584,230 s $ 3,584J30 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operating Supplies $ $ $ $ NIA $ s $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services NIA 0.00%
5700 __ CapJtal Outlal'§ NIA 0.00%
3,194.991 's 3175 752
$
s 3,584,230
$
' 861 316
NIA
24%
$
$ 3,584,230
$ $
$ 3,584.230
0.00%
0.00%
Available Cash Bala!!_ee • EOY $ 935,251 s 855,366 $ ~.103,302 $ 520,300 $ 920.456
' 1,103,302
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As % Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Esumate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
591 Water Fund
Available Cash Balance. BOY s 6,094,347 $ 5,982,941 $ 5,148,538 $ 5,071,320 $ 5,071,320 s (77.218) $ 5,148,538
Revenues
Special assessments $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.00%
Federal grants 90,000 90,000 90,000 0.00% EDA GAANT FOR SEAWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK
State grants 100,000 100,000 100,000 0.00% SHORELINE DRIVE
State shared revenue 0.00%
Charges for services. City 3,531,540 3,980,059 3,550,000 8.220 3,550,000 3,550,000 0.00%
Charges for services - Township 450,000 3,634 450,000 450,000 0.00%
Hydrant Rental - Township 0.00%
Interest income 320,696 230,864 140,000 12,518 140,000 140,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 454,812 54,000 54,000 54,000 0.00%
Other 84,101 52,184 100 000 58,897 100,000 100,000 0.00%
$ 3.936,337 s 4,717,919 s 4484 000 $ 83,269 s 4484 000 $ $ 4 484 000 0.00%
30548 Operating Expenditures Administration
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ $ s $ NIA s $ $ 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 10 NIA 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 359,581 453,613 481,606 93,023 19% 481,606 481,606 0.00% INSURANCE/INDIRECTCOSTS/ADMININISTRATION FEE
5400 Other Expenses 7,431 6,144 NIA 0.00%
5700 Capital Ou~ay.; 45 NIA 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses 495,727 471,301 432,270 5,349 1% 432,270 432,270 0.00% INTEREST ON WATER BONDS
Other Cash Uses and Adjustments
{e.g .. Debt Princieal) 302,213 591,739 390,000 0% 390,000 390,000 0.00% PRINCIPAL ON WATER BONDS
s 1164,997 $ 1522807 $ 1 303 876 s 98,372 8% $ 1,303,876 $ $ 1,303 876 0.00%
60559 Operating Expenditures Maintenance. City
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 698,628 $ 788,512 $ 601,859 s 145,963 24% $ 601,859 $ $ 601,859 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 237,968 235,205 92,350 20,168 22% 92,350 92,350 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 293,031 350,528 321,312 87,028 27% 321,312 321,312 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 71,680 12,356 4,130 3,239 78% 4,130 4,130 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 5,129 7,327 10,900 1,778 16% 10,900 10,900 0.00%
5900 Ot/ler Financing Uses NIA 0.00%
1,306.436 s 1,393 928 $ 1,030,551 $ 258176 25% $ 1 030,551 s s 1 030551 0.00%
Operating Expenditures Maintenance. Township
'°'"
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 3,190 s 206,700 s 292,602 $ 50,389 17% $ 292,602 s s 292,602 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 863 9,526 12,483 365 3% 12,483 12,483 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 47 120,508 125,594 27,030 22% 125,594 125,594 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 4'9 1,420 13 1% 1,420 1,420 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 800 4,350 1.399 32% 4,350 4,350 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses NIA 0.00%
s 4,100 $ 338,003 s 436,449 $ 79,196 18% $ 436.449 $ s 436,449 0.00%
60558 Operating Expenditures Filtration
5100 Salaries & Benefits s 469,642 $ 440.416 $ 480,724 $ 105,772 22% s 480,724 $ $ 480,724 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 121,252 115,076 107,140 22,291 21% 107,140 107,140 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 285,375 349,281 400,250 44,103 11% 400,250 400,250 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 3,546 2,374 4,150 '75 16% 4,150 4,150 0.00%
5700 Capital OLJ!lays 27,339 104,236 39,950 s.ns 17% 39,950 39,950 0.00%
5900 -- Other Financi!!Q Uses NIA 0,00%
907154 $ 1,011,383 $ 1 032.214 s 179 617 17% s 1,032 214 $ $ 1 032,214 0.9_0%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operating Supplies $ $ $ s NIA $ $ $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 665,056 1,363,419 5,288,771 32,285 1% 5,232,771 (56,000) 5,288,771 1.07% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
5700 Cai;iital Outla~ NIA 0.00%
665,056 s 1,363,419 $ 5,286,771 s 32,285 1% $ 5,232,771 $ (56,000) $ 5,268,771 1.07%
4,047743 s 5 629 540 $ 9 091 861 s 647 646 '% $ 9,035 861 $ 9 091,861 0.62%
Available Cash Balance. EOY .1______§_,_~,~s_ 5,071,320 $ 540,677 s 4,506,943 $ 519,459 $ \21,218) $ 540,677
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast - Non-General Funds
% Change
Original Budget Actual Thru March Actual As% Revised Estimate Change From Original Budget From 2001
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Estimate 2002 2002 of Revised 2002 2002 Original Estimate 2002 Revised Comments
590 Sewer Fund
Available Cash Balance - BOY $ 787,448 $ 1.445,721 $ 1,266,849 s 1,027,063 $ 1,027,063 $ (239,786) S 1,266,849
Revenues
Special assessments $ s $ $ $ $ s 0.00%
Federal grants 3,000 3,000 3,000 0.00%
State grants 100,000 462,131 560,000 460,000 100,000 -82.14% SHORELINE DRIVE
State shared revenue 0.00%
Charges for services 3,989,052 3,808,493 4,750,000 4,750,000 4,750,000 0.00%
Interest income 54,362 69,601 40,000 6,180 40,000 40,000 0.00%
Operating transfers in 0.00%
Other 45,967 113,201 80.000 9,388 80,000 80,000 0.00%
s 4,089,381 s 3,991 295 $ 4,973.000 $ 477.699 $ 5433 000 s 460,000 s 4,973,000 -8.47%
30$4' Operating Expenditures Administration
5100 Salaries & Benefits s s $ $ NIA $ s s 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies NIA 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 269,957 629,842 264,062 54,479 21% 264,062 264,062 0.00% INSURANCE/INDIRECT COSTS/ADMININISTRATION FEE
5400 Other Expenses 13,098 9,835 NIA 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 45 NIA 0.00%
5900 Other Financing Uses 216,776 651,981 176,043 0% 176,043 176,043 0.00% INTEREST ON SEWER BONDS
Other Cash Uses and Adjustments
(e.g .. Debt Princieal) 714,619 551,971 458,918 0% 458,918 458,918 0.00% PRINCIPAL ON SEWER BONDS
1,214,495 $ 1 843,629 $ 899,023 $ 54479 6% $ 899,023 s $ 899.023 0.00%
60559 Operating Expenditures Maintenance
5100 Salaries & Benefits $ 551,757 $ 587,142 $ 725,420 $ 135,000 19% $ 725,420 s $ 725,420 0.00%
5200 Operating Supplies 50,955 54,343 54,335 7,000 13% 54,335 54,335 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 1,346,297 1,684,616 2,086,204 203,982 10% 2,088,204 2,086,204 0.00%
5400 Other Expenses 3,"2 2,093 2,900 125 4% 2,900 2,900 0.00%
5700 Capital Outlays 8,380 8,511 17,700 2.067 12% 17,700 17,700 0.00%
5900 Other Financin Uses NIA 0.00%
1 961 381 $ 2,336,705 $ 2,886,559 $ 348,174 12% $ 2,886,559 s $ 2,888.559 0.00%
90000 Project Expenditures
5200 Operating Supplies $ $ $ $ NIA $ s $ 0.00%
5300 Contractual Services 255,232 229,619 805,000 13,209 1% 1,264,000 459,000 805,000 -36,31% SEE "BUDGETED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS" FOR DETAIL
5700 ___ , CaQital Outla\1§ NIA 0.00%
255,232 $ 229,619 s 805 000 $ 13,209 1% $ 1,264,000 s 459,000 $ 805,000 -36.31%
3.431,108 $ 4.409,953 s 4,590,582 $ 415,862 8% $ 5,049.582 $ 4,590,582 -9.09%
Ava!lab!e Cash Balance - EOY $ 1,445,721 $ 1,027,063 s 1,649,267 $ 1,088,900 $ 1,410,481 $ 1,649,267
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast
Budgeted Capital Improvements
1st Quarter 3rd Quarter
Original
Responsibility Budget Budget Comments
Budget
Reforecast Reforecast
2002 PROJECTS
101 General Fund
91 001 Community Center Design Scott $ 100,000 $ 8,000 NEW COMMISSION PRIORITIES; RESIDUAL COSTS FOR STUDY
91002 Relocate Central Fire (Acquisition, Demolition) Simpson 250,000 100,000 REDUCED DUE TO BUDGET SHORTFALL
91003 Alternate Power Supply for City Hall AI-Shatel 100,000 100,000
91004 Reese Park Restroom/Maintenance Building Scott 150,000 150,000
99012 Geographical Information System Moore 7,500
99019 Restlawn Office Renovation (Phase II) Scott 70,000 85,000 BIDS HIGHER THAN EXPECTED
670,000 450,500
404 Public lm~rovement Fund
91005 Demolish Hackley Fire Station {Incl Repeater Relocation) Kuhn 70,000 70,000
99020 Seaway-Hackley Industrial Park Property Acquisition Brubaker-Clarke 54,000 54,000
Property Acquisition Brubaker-Clarke 75,000 75,000
Hovercraft Simpson 25,000 25,000
224,000 224,000
202 Major Streets
90041 Black Creek Road, Sherman to Latimer A!-Shatel 510,000 2,000 Special Assessment not Approved
90042 Washington, Division to Franklin AI-Shatel 225,000 350,000 Reconstruction
90043 Laketon, Peck to Park AI-Shatel 550,000 550,000 New Construction - Partially Funded by $440,000 STP Grant
90052 Division, Southern to Western AI-Shatel 210,000 175,000 Mill & Resurtace
90053 Southern, Division to Seaway AI-Shatel 250,000 125,000 Mill and Resurtace - Partially Funded by $130,000 TEDF Grant
90063 M-120 over Musekgon River AI-Shatel 55,000 carryover Costs from 2001
90020 Barney, Valley to Roberts AI-Shatel 14,000 Canyover Costs from 2001
90011 Barclay, Sherman to Hackley AI-Shatel 15,000 Carryover Costs from 2001
90056 Houston, Third to First Al-Shate! 150,000 125,000 Mill & Resurface - CDBG
90058 Terrace St., Irwin to Iona A!-Shatel 325,000 285,000 Reconstruction
90059 Harvey, Keating to South End {900' of Gravel Road) AI-Shatel 100,000 100,000 New Construction
90060 Roberts, Keating to Laketon AI-Shatel 171,000 125,000 Mill and Resurtace - Partially Funded by $86,000 STP Grant
90061 State's Job (Seaway Drive, Southern to Sherman) AI-Shatel 60,000 55,000
90063 State's Job (US31 SB Off Ramp at Sherman) AI-Shatel 15,000 3,000
91013 Laketon @ Barclay Intersection AI-Shatel 160,000
96017 Shoreline Dr (incl Terrace Extension, Spring & Western) AI-Shatel 5,850,000 5,850,000 New Construction - Funded by $11.6 millionState Grant
96059 Sidewalks - Handicap Ramps AI-Shatel 25,000 20,000
99020 Seaway-Hackley Industrial Al-Shate! 114,000 114,000 Funded 60% by EDA Grant
Unspecified Projects A!-Shatel 200,000 260,000
8,755,000 8,383,000
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast
Budgeted Capital Improvements
1st Quarter 3rd Quarter
Original
Responsibility Budget Budget Comments
Budget
Reforecast Reforecast
2002 PROJECTS
203 Local Streets
90057 Leon, Harrison to Crozier (Gravel Street) Al-Sha tel 150,000 150,000 New Construction
90064 Austin, Barney to Delano Al-Shatel 90,000 6,000 Reconstruction
90065 Sherin, Lakeshore Drive to Miner AI-Shate! 100,000 75,000 New Construction and Reconstruction
96017 Shoreline Dr (inc! Terrace Extension, Spring & Western) AI-Shatel 50,000 50,000 New Construction • Funded by State Grant
96059 Sidewalks - Handicap Ramps AI-Shatel 25,000 20,000
99020 Seaway-Hackley Industrial AI-Shatel 255,000 255,000 Funded 60% by EDA Grant
Unspecified Projects AI-Shatel 200,000 200,000
870,000 756,000
403 Sidewalks
96059 2002 Sidewalk Replacement Program AI-Shatel 600,000 300,000 Financed With Special Assessment Bonds
482 State Grants Fund
90014 Clean Michigan Initiative (Teledyne-Streets, Utilities) Brubaker-Clarke 1,601,000 1,601,000
90040 Lakeshore Trail Phase I (Heritage to Grand Trunk) Scott 100,000 100,000 Continued Property Acquisition
91006 Beachwood Park Renovation Scott 405,000 405,000 Local Match $105,000
91008 Core Communities Initiative (Te!edyne•Boardwalk) Brubaker•Clarke 1,000,000 1,000,000 Financed With Core Communities Loan
96096 Site Assessment Projects Brubaker.Clarke 237,625 237,625
98022 Cole's Expansion Brubaker•C!arke 99,056 99,056
98050 Lakeshore Trail Phase II (Laketon) Scott 281,000 281,000
99010 Clean Michigan Initiative (Amazon Building) Brubaker•Clarke 100,418 100,418
99080 Lakeshore Trail Phase IV (Shoreline Drive) Scott 300,000 300,000
4,124,099 4,124,099
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast
Budgeted Capital Improvements
1st Quarter 3rd Quarter
Original
Responsibility Budget Budget Comments
Budget
Reforecast Reforecast
2002 PROJECTS
590 Sewer
90041 Black Creek Road, Sherman to Latimer AI-Shatel 10,000
90042 Washington, Division to Franklin Al-Shatel 80,000 140,000 Street Project - Assoclated Utility Work
90043 Laketon, Peck to Park A!-Shatel 10,000 Street Project - Assoclated Utility Work
90052 Division, Southern to Western AI-Shate! 15,000 15,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
90053 Southern, Division to Seaway AI-Shatel 10,000 1,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90057 Leon, Harrison to Crozier AI-Shatel 10,000 7,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90058 Terrace St, Irwin to Iona AI-Shatel 150,000 150,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90059 Harvey, Keating to South end AI-Shatel 80,000 145,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90060 Roberts, Keating to Laketon AI-Shatel 5,000 1,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90063 M-120 over Muskegon River AI-Shatel 463,000 100% Reimbursed from MDOT
90065 Sherin, Lakeshore Drive to Miner AI-Shatel 10,000 1,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90066 Randolph, Westwood to End (Sewer Extension) AJ-Shatel 50,000 16,000 Homes Currently on Septic Systems
90068 Industrial Park Liftstation A!-Shatel 125,000 125,000
96017 Shoreline Dr (incl Terrace Extension, Spring & Western) AI-Shate! 100,000 100,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
99020 Seaway-Hackley Industrial AI-Shate! 100,000 100,000 Funded 60% by EDA Grant
Unspecified Projects AI-Shatel 50,000
805,000 1,264,000
591 Water
90041 Black Creek Road, Sherman to Latimer Al-Shatel 10,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
90042 Washington, Division to Franklin Al-Shatel 125,000 140,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
90043 Laketon, Peck to Park Al-Shatel 10,000 10,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90052 Division, Southern to Western AI-Shate! 100,000 100,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
90053 Southern, Division to Seaway AI-Shatel 15,000 1,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90056 Houston, Third to First AI-Shatel 75,000 30,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90057 Leon, Harrison to Crozier AI-Shatel 10,000 7,000 Street Project -Associated Utility Work
90058 Terrace St, Irwin to Iona AI-Shatel 150,000 190,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
90060 Roberts, Keating to Laketon AI-Shatel 5,000 1,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
90065 Sherin, Lakeshore Drive to Miner AI-Shatel 40,000 55,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
90067 Marshall St. Tank Painting Kuhn 200,000 200,000
96017 Shoreline Dr {incl Terrace Extension, Spring & Western) AI-Shate! 100,000 100,000 Street Project - Associated Utility Work
97041 Water Filtration Plant Improvements Kuhn 4,298,771 4,298,771 Financed With 1999 Water Improvement Bonds
99020 Seaway-Hackley Industrial Al-Sha tel 100,000 100,000 Funded 60% by EDA Grant
Unspecified Projects AI-Shatel 50,000
5,288,771 5,232,771
City of Muskegon
1st Quarter Budget Reforecast
Budgeted Capital Improvements
1st Quarter 3rd Quarter
Original
Responsibility Budget Budget Comments
Budget
Reforecast Reforecast
2002 PROJECTS
594 Marina & Launch Ramp
91 007 Hartshorn Electrical Upgrade Scott 245,000 245,000 Financed 50% With State Grant
642 Public Service Building
99040 Public Service Building Renovation Kuhn 159,350 159,350
661 Equipment Fund
Patrol Car Replacements (10) Kuhn 206,250 206,250 Replacement
Plow Truck Replacements (1) Kuhn 67,000 67,000 Repracement
Dump Truck (1) Kuhn 76,000 76,000 Replacement
Pickup Trucks 3/4 Ton (2) Kuhn 36,000 36,000 Replacement
Mini-Pickup Trucks (2) Kuhn 30,000 30,000 Replacement
Excavator (1) Kuhn 113,000 113,000 New - Will Replace Backhoe
Holder (1) Kuhn 75,000 75,000 Replacement
Sedans (6) Kuhn 96,000 96,000 Replacement
Radios and Various Other Minor Equipment Kuhn 67,200 67,200 Replacement
766,450 766,450
$ 22,577,670 L____gJ ,975, 170
Commission Meeting Date: May 14, 2002
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor & City Commission
From: Planning & Economic Development Department CfJC-.
RE: Purchase of State-Owned Land for Seaway
Industrial Park
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To approve the purchase of a vacant buildable lot on Park Street (designated as parcel
number 24-895-001-0007-00) described as CITY OF MUSKEGON YOUNG & WILLIAMS
ADDITION LOT 7 BLK 1. The cost of purchasing this lot will be $300. This lot is located in
the proposed Seaway Industrial Park and it's acquisition is necessary for completion of the
project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Purchase of this will allow for the completion of the Seaway Industrial Park, which will result
in more businesses and jobs locating to our community.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the attached resolution and to authorize both the Mayor and the Clerk to sign
said resolution.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
5/14/02
Resolution No. 2002-62(a)
MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A BUILDABLE LOT ON PARK
STREET FOR SEAWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK
WHEREAS, Act 451, P.A. 1994, as amended, provides for the conveyance of State-
owned tax reverted lands to municipal units for public purposes, and
WHEREAS, such lands are under the jurisdiction of the State of Michigan, Department
of Natural Resources and are available for acquisition under the provisions of the above
mentioned act: CITY OF MUSKEGON, YOUNG & WILLIAMS ADDITION, LOT 7
BLK 1, and
WHEREAS, the City of Muskegon desires to acquire such lands for purposes of
establishing an industrial park.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Muskegon is authorized to
make application to the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, Real Estate
Division for conveyance of said land to the City of Muskegon for a nominal fee as set by
the Natural Resources Commission,
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Muskegon shall set up necessary
procedures and controls to provide for the proper distribution of funds arising from the
subsequent sale of the acquired property in conformity with the above mentioned acts.
Adopted this 14th day of May, 2002.
Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spataro, Warmington, Buie
Nays: None
Absent: None
CERTIFICATION
2002-62(a)
I hereby certify that the foregoing constitutes a true and complete copy of a resolution
adopted by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon,
Michigan at a regular meeting held on May 14, 2002.
Property to be Purchased for Seaway Industrial Park N
2013 Park Street W~E
s
II
I i
I
,
lw+!GbBRO
TITlG-11 ~rm~
°'
0
\ _ _ _ _ _____J 1- m,-
,_ NGAv
11~ l-~
_J____J_ a::: . ~ r---
/I I 1' 1-------i , - ~ _ . L -
7TTTl ~ ,a iL ' ' I
- r-1~~
I 1--------i
I
~Jllllli
!AN AV
I I
.
T'I IillJ1 I
i /
! I
/ /
II
1'H ~~ .* = Subject Property(ies)
Lb ,~ °'""
~
· --j, ~ to be purchased
1117 [[lIIJ it
ITT77 []]' :
~r~rn LLJJ
U_LJJ
ll/l
cJGK-AV_lj
<(
0
l;[[IJ /
~ l iH IJ
]~~,-y
lQ'.~
j ~ f---------j ~
dil1 II '°
L
Date: May 14, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Consideration of Bids
Leon, Crozier to Harrison
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The Leon Street construction contract (H-1543), using concrete, be awarded to Lakeside
Construction since they were the lowest (see bid tabulation) responsible bidder with a bid
price of $171,599.25.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The construction cost of $171,599.25 plus associated engineering cost which is estimated at
an additional 15%.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
The budgeted amount of $150,000 (using asphalt) will have to be revised to $200,000.
This revision will be shown on the next quarterly update.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Award the contract to Lakeside Construction.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
H-1543 LEON, CROZIER TO HARRISON
BID TABULATION
May 2, 2002
ASPHALT
CONTRACTOR JACKSON-MERKEY ERSIFIED CONTRACTO NAGEL CONSTRUCTION WADEL STABILIZATION LAKESIDE CONSTRUCTION FELCO CONTRACTORS
ADDRESS 555 E WESTERN AVE 6775 HARVEY ST PO BOX 10 2500 OCEANA DR 13840 172ND AVE 874 PULASKI AVE
C!TY/ST MUSKEGON, Ml SPRING LAKE, Ml MOLINE. Ml HART.Ml GRAND HAVEN. Ml MUSKEGON, Ml
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE NIT PRIG TOTAL PRICE PRICE TOTAL PR!CE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UN!T PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PR!CE TOTAL PRICE
ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 8 EACH S445.00 $3,560.00 $350.00 $2,800.00 NO BID FOR ASPHALT $400.00 $3,200.00 $350.00 52,800.00 $460.00 $3,680.00
' SYD SS.75 S16.583.00 $7.25 $20,909.00 $4.20 $12,112.80 $6.50 $18.746.00
2 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE. 22A 6" COMPACTED 2.884 S5.95 S17,159.80
3 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 22A 6 TON $24.00 $144.00 $50.00 $300.00 $25.00 $150.00 $12.00 $72.00 $49.00 $294.00
4 B!T LEVELING MIX 3C !1!1165#1 SYD 252 TON $46.00 S11,592.00 $46.14 $11.627.28 $42.14 $10,619.28 $43.00 $10,836.00 S44.40 $11,188,80
5 BIT TOP M!X 4C tr! 165#1 SYD 252 TON 550.00 $12,600.00 $51.13 $12,884.76 $4&.13 $11,624.76 $47.00 $11,844.00 $51.00 $12,852.00
6 CATCH BASIN CASTIN E.J. 7045 OR EQUAL 9 EACH $495.00 $4,455.00 $400.00 $3,600.00 $400.00 $3,600.00 $500 00 $4,500.00 $580.00 $5,220,00
7 CATCH BASIN, STD. 9 EACH $1,365.00 $12,285,00 $850.00 $7,650.00 $900.00 $8100.00 $1,100.00 $9,900.00 $1,400.00 512,600.00
8 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. STD 2,102 LFT $7.75 $16,290.50 $10.25 $21,545.50 $10.00 $21,020.00 $8.25 $17,341.50 $8.60 s1a.on.20
9 CONCRETE DRIVE APPROACH, 6" 514 SYD S21.55 $11,076.70 $25.00 $12,850.00 $30.00 $16,420.00 $30.00 $15,420.00 $24.00 $12,336.00
10 CONCRETE PAVEMENT Vv'ITH INTEGRAL CURB 20 SYD $31.50 $630.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 $>6.00 $720.00 $35.00 $700.00 $37.00 $740.00
CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 4" 938 SFT $2.55 $2,391.90 $3.25 S3.048.50 $2.45 $2,298.10 $2.50 $2,345.00 $3.75 $3,517.50
"
12 CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 6" 757 SFT $3.00 $2,271.00 $3.75 S2,838.75 $3.70 $2.800.90 SJ.SO S2.649.50 S4.25 53,217.25
13 CORPORATION STOP. 1" MUELLER# 150000R EQUAL 4 EACH 5245.00 S980.00 $300.00 $1,200.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 5200.00 $800.00 $240.00 $960.00
14 CURB STOP, 1" MUELLER #15150 OR EQUAL 4 EACH $275.00 $1,100.00 $200.00 $800.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $250.00 $1,000.00 S290.00 $1,160.00
,.
15 EXCAVATION
MANHOLE CASTING E.J. # 1000 OR EQUAL
904
3
CYD
EACH
59.35
$545.00
$8,452.40
$1,635.00
sa.oo
$400.00
$7,232.00
S1.200.00
...00
$500.00
$5,424.00
$1,500.00
$15.00
S350.00
$13,560.00
$1,050.00
S8.05
S480.00
S7.277.20
$1,440.00
17 MANHOLE, STD .. 4' ID. 0-10' DEEP 3 EACH S1.660.00 $4,980.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $1,250.00 $3,750.00 $1,900.00 SS.700.00
3 VFT 5450.00 S1,350.00 S250.00 $750.00 $300.00 $900.00 S400.00 $1,200.00 $125.00 $375.00
" RECONSTRUCTING MANHOLES
EACH 5510.00 $510.00 $325.00 $325.00 $250.00 $250.00 $200.00 s2moo S690.00 $690.00
19 REMOVING CATCH BASIN
20 REMOVING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 24
' LFT $10.00 $240.00 $20.00 $480.00 $10.00 $240.00 $10.00 $240.00 $8.00 S192.00
21 REMOVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 593 SFT $1.40 $830.20 $3.00 $1,779.00 $1.00 $593,00 S0.75 $444.75 $3.05 $1,808.65
22 REMOVING PAVEMENT ( CONC) 157 SYD $10.50 $1,648.50 $8.00 $1,256.00 $15.00 $2,355.00 $10.00 $1,570.00 $9.00 S1,413.00
EACH $675.00 $675.00 $100.00 $100.00 $500.00 $500.00 S225.00 S225.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
23 REMOVING TREES. 13" TO 24" D!A
24 SANITARY SEl/vER. 10". PVC SOR 35
'
75 L FT $26.00 $1,950.00 $22.00 $1,650.00 W>.00 $3,000.00 S35.00 $2,625.00 S30.00 $2,250.00
25 STORM SE'h'ER. 12" C•76 CL V 187 L FT $25.00 $4,675.00 $25.00 $4,675.00 $35.00 $6,545.00 $30.00 $5,610.00 $31.00 $5,797.00
26 TERRACE GRADING 1,019 LFT $8.50 $8,661.50 $6.75 $6,878.25 $10.00 $10,190.00 $9.00 $9,171,00 $12.80 $13,043.20
LUMP S10.965.00 $10,965.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
27 TRAFFIC CONTROL
28 WATER SERVICE. 1". TYPE "K"' COPPER
'
75 L FT S19.75 $1,481.25 $15.00 $1,125.00 $7.00 $525.00 $13.00 $975.00 S21.00 $1,575.00
29 WATER VALVE BOX. COMPLETE 2 EACH $450.00 $900.00 $400.00 $800.00 $285.00 sm.oo $150.00 $300.00 $390.00 $780.00
LEON TOTAL $144,912.95 $142,404.04 $0.00 ' s1•aH"l'.84 $143,374.75 $152,343.60
H-154 LEON-CROZIER TO HARRISON ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 3104102 (ASPHALT)
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 8 EACH $400.00 $3,200.00
2 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 22A 6" COMPACTED 2884 SYD $6.00 $17,304.00
3 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 22A 6 TON $30.00 $180.00
4 BIT LEVELING MIX 3C@ 165#1 SYD 252 TON $32.00 $8,064.00
5 BIT TOP MIX 4C@ 165#1 SYD 252 TON $38.00 $9,576.00
6 CATCH BASIN CASTIN E.J. 7045 OR EQUAL 9 EACH $400.00 $3,600.00
7 CATCH BASIN, STD. 9 EACH $1,300.00 $11,700.00
8 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, STD 2102 LFT $10.00 $21,020.00
9 CONCRETE DRIVE APPROACH, 6" 514 SYD $30.00 $15,420.00
10 CONCRETE PAVEMENT WITH INTEGRAL CURB 20 SYD $35.00 $700.00
11 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 4" 938 S FT $3.00 $2,814.00
12 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 6" 757 S FT $3.75 $2,838.75
13 CORPORATION STOP, 1" MUELLER# 15000 OR EQUAL 4 EACH $250.00 $1,000.00
14 CURB STOP, 1" MUELLER #15150 OR EQUAL 4 EACH $220.00 $880.00
15 EXCAVATION 904 CYD $7.00 $6,328.00
16 MANHOLE CASTING E.J. # 1000 OR EQUAL 3 EACH $400.00 $1,200.00
17 MANHOLE, STD., 4' ID, 0-10' DEEP 3 EACH $1,500.00 $4,500.00
18 RECONSTRUCTING MANHOLES 3 VFT $350.00 $1,050.00
19 REMOVING CATCH BASIN 1 EACH $500.00 $500.00
20 REMOVING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 24 L FT $12.00 $288.00
21 REMOVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 593 S FT $2.00 $1,186.00
22 REMOVING PAVEMENT (CONG) 157 SYD $15.00 $2,355.00
23 REMOVING TREES, 13" TO 24" DIA 1 EACH $500.00 $500.00
24 SANITARY SEWER, 10", PVC SDR 35 75 LFT $40.00 $3,000.00
25 STORM SEWER, 12" C-76 CL V 187 L FT $28.00 $5,236.00
26 TERRACE GRADING 1019 L FT $8.00 $8,152.00
27 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP $10,000.00 $10,000.00
28 WATER SERVICE, 1", TYPE "K" COPPER 75 L FT $25.00 $1,875.00
29 WATER VALVE BOX, COMPLETE 2 EACH $350.00 $700.00
SUB-TOTAL $145,166.75
15% ENGINEERING $21,775.01
TOTAL $166,941.76
H-1543 LEON, CROZIER TO HARRISON
BID TABULATION
May 2, 2002
CONCRETE
CONTRACTOR IACKSON-MERKEY DIVERSlflEO CONTRACTORS NAGH CONSTRUCTION WADEL STA81UZATl0N lAKESJOE CONSTRUCTION FELCO CONTRACTORS
ADDRESS 555 E WESTERN AVE 6775 HARVEY ST PO 80X 10 2500 OCEANA DR 13a.l-0 172NDAVE 874 PULASKI AVE
CITY/ST MUSKEGON Ml SPRING LAKE Ml MOLINE Ml HART Ml GRANO HAVEN Ml MUSKEGON Ml
n,M DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRJCE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRJCE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
EACH 5445.00 $3,$60.00 $350.00 $2,800.00 $200.00 Sl,600.00 $400.00 $3,200.00 $400.00 S3,20o.oo
' ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING
' TON $24.00 $144.00 sso.oo $300.00 $20.00 s120.oo S2S.OO s,so.oo $50.00
S,100.00 $3,200.00
2 AGGREGATE IASE COURSE, 22A
' $495.00 $4,455.00 $400.00 $3,600.00 $300.00 $2,700.00 .......
$300.00 $49.00 $29-l.OO
J CATCH BASIN CASTINE./. 7045 OR FnUAl
' EACH
EACH $1,365.00 $12,285.00 $850.00 $7,650.00 $1,000.00 $9,000.00
$3,600.00
sa,100.00
S500.00 $4,500.00 $590.00 S5,310.00
4
s
CATCH BASIN, STD.
CONCRETE CURB ANO CUTTER, STD
'
20 rn $10.00 $200.00 $25.00 ssoo.oo $21.00 $420.00
S900.00
$10.00 $200.00
$1,100.00
S22.00
S9,900.00
54-40.00
$1,200.00
$34.00
$10,800.00
5680.00
CONCllETE DRIVE APPROACH, 6" m SYD $20.00 $10,280.00 $24.00 $12,336.00 $25.00 $12,850.00 $30.00 $15,420.00 $26.50 $13,621.00 $28.00
'
7 CONOETE PAVEMENT6"WITH INTEGRAL CURB 3,373 SYD $26.50 $89,384.50 S34.00 S114,682.00 $34.00 $114,682.00 $36.00 $121,428.00 S2S.OO $34,325.00 $32.40
$14,392.00
$109,285.20
SFT S2.05 51,922.90 Sl.25 Sl,048.50 S2.40 $2,251.20 S2.45 S2,29ll.10 S2.50
' CONcam SIOEWALIC, 4"
"' $2.60 $1,%8.20 S3.7S $2,838.75 $3.00 $2,271.00 S3.7o 52,800.90
$2,345.00 53.75 $3,517.50
' CONCRffi SIDEWALK, 6"
"' SFT 53.25 $2,460.25 S4.25 53,217.25
,0 CORPORATION STOP, r MUELLER I 15000 OR EQUAL • EACH $245.00 S980.00 S300.00 Sl,200.00 $100.00 $400.00 $500.00 s2,ooo.oo $350.00 $1,400.00 $205.00 $820.00
" CURB STOP, 1' MUElUR 115150 OR EOUAL • EACH $275.00 Sl,100.00 $200.00 saoo.oo siso.oo $600.00 ssoo.oo s2,ooo.oo S350.00 51,400.00 S290.00 S1,160.00
" EXCAVATION
MANHOLE CASTING E.J. I 1000 01; ~~UAL
"s
J
OD
EACH
$12.25
5545.00
58,146.25
$1,635.00
so.oo
$400.00
SS,320.00
ST,200.00
sa.oo
$300.00
SS,320.00
$900.00
"·"
ssoo.oo
$3,990.00
$1,500.00
S16.00
S3SO.OO
$10,640.00
51,050.00
$9.05
$480.00
56,018.25
$1,440.00
" EACH $1,660.00 $4,980,00 Sl,200,00 $3,600.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00 51,200.00 $3,600.00 51,500.00
" MANHOLE, ST0.,4' ID, 0-10' DEEP
' m $450.00 51,350.00 5250.00 $750.00 $100.00 Sl00.00 SJ00.00 $900.00
$4,500.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00
" RECONSTRUCTING MANHOLES
' EACH $510.00 $510.00 S350.00 $350.00 $100.00
S4SO.OO $1,350.00 $125.00 5375.00
" REMOVING CATCH BASIN
' $10.00 $240.00 $20.00 $480.00
$100.00 $250.00 S2S0.00 s200.00 5200,00 5'00.00 $600.00
" REMOVING CONCllETE CURB AND GUffiR
" l fT
SfT $1.40 $830.20 $3.00 $1,779.00
53.00 S72.00 s,o.oo $240.00 510.00 S240.00 $8.00 5192.00
"
REMOVING CONOlffi SIDEWALK
REMOVING PAVEMENT ( CONC)
"'
75 SYD SH.SO 51,087.50 S0.00 $600.00
so.so
$4.00
$2%.50
5300.00
$1.00
$20.00
S593.00
$1,500.00
s1.00
S1s.oo
S593.oo
51,125.00
$3.05
$9.00
$1,1108.65
5675.00
" REMOVING TltEES, 13" T024" DIA EACH 5675.00 $675.00 $100.00 $100.00 $400,00 $400,00 $500,00 ssoo.oo $350.00 5350.00 Sl,000.00 Sl,000,00
20
' Sl,000.00 s22.oo $3,300.00 $30.00 $4,500.00 540.00 56,000.00
" SANITARY SEWt:R, 10", P\IC 501; 35
"' "' $20.00
S25.oo $4,675.00 $25.00 $4,675.00 $40.00 S7,4tio.oo $35.00 $6,545.00
$40.00
S35.00
$6,000.00
$6,545.00
$29.00
S32.00
$4,350.00
S5,')M.OO
22 STORM ~ER, 12" C•76 Cl V
TERRACE GRADING
"'
1,019
L fT
L fT SIi.SO $8,661.50 S6.75 $6,878.25 $4.00 $4,076.00 s10.00 ST0,190.00 Sl0.00 $10,190.00 512.0S $12,278.95
" LUMP $10,475.00 St0,475.00 S5,ooo.oo S5,000.00 $1,000.00 Sl,000,00 S5,ooo.oo 55,000.00 Sl,500.00 $3500.00 5',000.00 56,000.00
"
25
TRAFFIC CONTROL
WATER SERVICE, 1•, TYPE "IC" COPPER 75
' L fT $19.75 $1,481.25 $15.00 Sl,125.00 Sl0.00 $750.00 57.00 S52S.OO S15.00 Sl,125.00 s21.oo 51,575.00
26 WATER VALVE BOX, COMPLETE , EACH $450,00 $900.00 $400.00 $800.00 S150.00 $300.00 5285.00 $570.00 S1S0.00 '300.oo Sl90.00 5780.00
I
LEON CONCRm TOTAL $174,926.30 $185,712.50 $176,888.70 $203,100.00 $171,599.15 $199,952.80
H-154 LEON- CROZIER TO HARRISON ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 3/04/02 CONCRETE AL TERNATE
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
1 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING 8 EACH $400.00 $3,200.00
2 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 22A 6 TON $30.00 $180.00
3 CATCH BASIN CASTIN E.J. 7045 OR EQUAL 9 EACH $400.00 $3,600.00
4 CATCH BASIN, STD. 9 EACH $1,300.00 $11,700.00
5 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, STD 20 LFT $10.00 $200.00
6 CONCRETE DRIVE APPROACH, 6" 514 SYD $30.00 $15,420.00
7 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6" WITH INTEGRAL CURB 3373 SYD $28.00 $94,444.00
8 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 4" 938 S FT $3.00 $2,814.00
9 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 6" 757 S FT $3.75 $2,838.75
10 CORPORATION STOP, 1" MUELLER# 15000 OR EQUAL 4 EACH $250.00 $1,000.00
11 CURB STOP, 1" MUELLER #15150 OR EQUAL 4 EACH $220.00 $880.00
12 EXCAVATION 665 CYD $7.00 $4,655.00
13 MANHOLE CASTING E.J. # 1000 OR EQUAL 3 EACH $400.00 $1,200.00
14 MANHOLE, STD., 4' ID, 0-10' DEEP 3 EACH $1,500.00 $4,500.00
15 RECONSTRUCTING MANHOLES 3 VFT $350.00 $1,050.00
16 REMOVING CATCH BASIN 1 EACH $500.00 $500.00
17 REMOVING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 24 LFT $12.00 $288.00
18 REMOVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 593 SFT $2.00 $1,186.00
19 REMOVING PAVEMENT (CONG) 157 SYD $15.00 $2,355.00
20 REMOVING TREES, 13" TO 24" DIA 1 EACH $500.00 $500.00
21 SANITARY SEWER, 10", PVC SDR 35 75 L FT $40.00 $3,000.00
22 STORM SEWER, 12" C-76 CL V 187 L FT $28.00 $5,236.00
23 TERRACE GRADING 1019 L FT $8.00 $8,152.00
24 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP $10,000.00 $10,000.00
25 WATER SERVICE, 1", TYPE "K" COPPER 75 L FT $25.00 $1,875.00
26 WATER VALVE BOX, COMPLETE 2 EACH $350.00 $700.00
SUB-TOTAL $181,473.75
15% ENGINEERING $27,221.06
TOTAL $208,694.81
Date: May2,2002
To: Honorable ~ap~City Commissioners
From: Ric Scott /'/'{1Y'l1
RE: Beachwood Park Bids
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To award a contract to Elzinga & Volkers, Inc. to do the
renovation project at Beachwood Park.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
$311,784
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Alllrnmtlve Action
231/724-6703
FAX/722-1214
Assessor
231 /724-6708
FAX1726-5181
Cemetery
231/724-6783
FAX/726-5617
Civil Service
23 I /724-67 16
FAX/724-4405 West Michigan's Shoreline City
Clerk
231/724-6705 Date: May 2, 2002
FAX/724-4178
Comm. & Neigh.
To: Honorable ~lff~ Commissioners
Services
23 I /724-6717
Fr om: Ric Scott / Cfrtz;(Z-4
FAX/726-250 1
Re : Beachwood Park Bids
Engineering
231/724-6707 On Tuesday April 23, 2002, eight bids were received for
FAX/727-6904
the Beachwood Park Renovation Project. The bids were as
Finance follows (addresses on attache d sheet)
23 I /724-6713
FAX/724-6768 Apex Construction $349,600
Fire Dept. Muskegon Quality Builde rs $364,994
2311724-6792
FAX/724-6985
Fensco $505,215
Alliance Construction $351.057
Income Tax
23 I /724-6770
Alstrom Construction $354,765.70
FAX/724-6768 Wolffis Construction $398,700
Info. Systems Elzinga & Volkers, Inc. $311,784
231/724-6744 Cycon $375,487
F AX/722-430 I
Leisure Service Both the Architects and staff recommend you award the
231/724-6704
FAX/724-1196 bid to Elzinga & Volkers for $311,784. Elzinga &
Manager's Office
Volkers has wor ked for the City before. They built
231/724-6724 Jaycee's Launch Ramp back in the 80's and wer e the
FAX/722-1214
construction managers f or Walker Arena. The architects
Mayor's Office have gone over the bid with E & V and are confident that
231/724-6701
FAX/722-1214
they can do the work for that price.
Ins11ectlon Services
231/724-6715 The grant for this project is for up to $400,000. I
FAX/726-250 I would further ask that you authorize staff to work with
Planning/Zoning the Beachwood/Bluffton Neighborhood Association to add a
231/724-6702
FA X/724-6790
few additional site amenities, such as replacing the
parki ng lot border posts or a dding additional playgr ound
Police Dept.
231 /724-6750
equipme nt or picnic table , so tha t total p r oje ct cost
FAX/722-5140 approaches but doe s not exce ed $400,000 including the
Public Works
Archite ctural fees, which a re $28,900 .
231/724-4 l 00
F AX/722-4188
I would ask that you award the contract to E & V and
Trcosurer that you authorize staff to add to the contract up to
231 /724-6720
FAX/724-6768 the grant amount of $400,000.
Water Dilling Dept.
231/724-6718 Thank you for your considera tion.
F AX/724-6768
W a ter Flllratlon
231/724-4106
FAX/755-5290
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, Ml 49443-0536
APR-25-02 14,22 FROM, MC SMITH ASSOCIATES 1D: 161B'l51 l835 PAGE 3
BIDDER LIST FOR BEACHWOOD PARK
. ·--~---· -~---------
Alliance Construct1011 Alliance Construction Group
678 Front St NW Suite 2(,5
(irand Rapids MI 49504
6 I6"456-9450 I fax 616-456-9594
"-~-•-------·
••-"
Alstrom Construclion, Inc. l\l,;trn111 Construction, Inc.
P.O. Box 4187
Muskegon Ml 49444-0 I X7
2.11- 79XA56 I
f\ 211- 798-4551
Apex Contrnctors, In.;;. 1 Apex Contractors, Inc
Attn: Mark Miedema
410 I 27'h SlnK•t
Dorr Mf 49323
(i l C.-896-8699
fx 616-896-713 7
--+-
Cycon Enterprise,, Inc. Cycon Enterr,ri~es, Inc.
0-608 Quirn;y Avenue SW
Grandvi Ile Ml 49418
616-8%-6488
fx 1, I l>-896-6490
E11inga & Volks:rs, Inc. Elzinga & Volkcrn, Inc.
86 East Sixth Street
Holland Mi 49423
6 I6-392-2383
fx 616-392-3752
··~·-··••w, - - - - - - - - - - - · · · - · · - .
Fensco, fn~ l\,nsco, l nc,
I 54'.l2 - 22o•h Avcnu~
Big l{apids Ml 49307
Ph 231-~92-1000
... _..... "- ,., - Fx 2.l 1- 796-3619
Muskegon Quality [Juildcrs Mw;kegon Quality Builders
283 7 Peck St.
M11skego11 Heights Ml 49444
231-73 3-4278
fx 231-733-2978
6505 S. D1v1sion, Suite C
Grand R~pids Ml 49)4~
L - - - - • - . s • • - ~ - - - - - - - - --·-
6lb-281-l522
fx hll,-2XI .. IS42
--- --
Date: April 16, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Ric Scott ;;J.la#"
RIE: Conservation District Request
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The Muskegon Conservation District is requesting that
they be allowed to place many signs along Ruddiman Creek
warning people of the danger of contact with the water
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Leisure Services Board recommends approval
AfOrnmllve Acllon
23 l /724-6703
FAX/722-1214
Assessor
23 I /724-6708
FAX/726-518 1
Cemetery
23 l /724-6783
FAX/726-56 17
C ivil Service
23 l /724-67 16
FAX/724-4405
Clerk
23 I/724-6705
FAX/724-4 178
Date: April. 16 , 2 0 02
Comm, & Neigh,
Services To: Honorabl.e MaY,O:fj;#-d City Commissioners
23 l /724-6717
FAX/726-250 1
From : Ric Scott Jf/aAI) ·-
Engineering
23 1/724-6707 Re : Conservation District Re quest
FAX/727-6904
The Muskegon Conservation District has requested that
Finance
231/724-6713
they be allowed to place various signs al.ong Ruddiman
FAX/724-6768 Creek to warn peopl.e of the dange rs in the water . Their
Fire Dept. request is attaches as is a design of the sign .
23 I /724-6792
F AX/724-6985 The Leisure Services Board recommended approval. of the
Income Tax
request at their meeting on the 15 th •
23 l /724-6770
FAX/724-6768 I would recommend approval of the request .
Info. Systems Thank you for your consideration.
231/724-6744
FAX/722-4301
Leisure Service
23 I/724-6704
FAX/724-1196
Mennger's Ofnce
231/724-6724
FAX/722-1214
Mayor's Office
231/724-6701
FAX/722-1214
Jnspccllon Services
23 l /724-671 S
FAX/726-250 l
Plnnnlng/Zonlng
231 /724-6702
FAX/724-6790
Police Dept.
231/724-6750
FAX/722-5140
Public Works
231/724-4100
FAX/722-4 188
Treasurer
231/724-6720
FAX/724-6768
Wutcr Billing Dept.
23 l /724-6718
F AX/724-6768
Water Flltrntion
231/724-4106
F AX/755-5290
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, MI 49443-0536
1001 E. Wesley, Room 6
_. Muskegon, Michigan 49442
..1111
Conservation Districts
231/ 773-0008 231/ 773-01 29
------ Fax 231 / 773-1210
April 11, 2002
RE: Ruddiman Creek Pollution Warning Sign
P.O. Box 536
933 Terrace St.
Muskegon,MI 49443
Dear Ric Scott:
I am sending you the information relevant to the Ruddiman Creek Pollution Warning Signs that
we are in the process of developing with a local sign company. The layout for the signs were
developed by the Ruddiman Creek Technical Team with input from the following participants:
Bob Fountain - City of Muskegon Greg Mund- USDA/NRCS
Vicki Webster- Muskegon County Health Department
Tom Berdinski- Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Arn Boezaart - Community Foundation for Muskegon County
Rick Rediski - GVSU Theresa Bernhardt - RCTF
Kathy Evans - Muskegon Conservation District
In the grant proposal you will find the need for the signs described in Section 2. Purpose of
Grant. It has been found that virtually every branch and the lagoon portion of Ruddiman Creek
contain high levels of lead, arsenic, and PCB' s. The areas of contaminated sediment will be
cleaned up, but in the mean time signage is needed to warn of the risks created by this sediment.
The signs will not only alert the communities of the risks, they will also provide them with a
phone number and web site they can access to learn about the progress of the clean up efforts.
The Ruddiman Creek Task Force (RCTF) holds public meetings to hear the concerns that the
community has about the creek. The next meeting is scheduled for April 16, 2002, at 7:00 p.m.,
in the McGraft Community Building. This meeting will allow the community to discuss where
the worst spots are, and prioritize the clean-up areas. They will also be able to decide at which
locations signs are needed most. For more information on this meeting you can contact Theresa
Bernhardt at 755-8221.
Sincerely,
~ but:A?Mf»7
Rebecca Parker
Water Quality Specialist
Muskegon Conservation District
Enclosures (2)
Managing Our Natural Resources
/\II Conservation District programs and services are offered on a nond iscriminatory basis
without regard to race, color, national origin. religion, s.ex, age, marital status, handicap, height or weight
0
Rud,11cli111an c::reel<
This program is
made possi1>le by
a grant from·the
Next GeneratJon
Fund of the
Community
Foundation for
Ycru Can Help!
Muskegon County
~~ For Information by· Ptnne·or on the Web:
--
;---
=-=
.;;;;._ 7.6.7.-1.207 or Mu~lcegc,nlake.org
0
933 Terrace Street
MuskeQon, Ml 49440
oFF,cE 231-724-6705
FAX 231-724-4178 . .
~t;:hu ·
~.1.1t-.zr . 0
f Mu~.1eego...n.
. ,lx~, ·
..!_ _ · ·
Cl~rk"s; Offioo
FaxCoa-Srset
To: &JL(l] JZ;n From: ~
Fax: Pages: S--
Phone: Date: f- / f -o:<
Re:. CC:
• Urgent • For Review • Please Comment • Please Reply • Please Recycle
I ~ ~ . cl/~~
~~- ;~ ~ -
~~ - ~~~
4 (231) .7 ~ Y- t 7o t/ .
~/
·d/ ·
,.:,, . :
Date: May 6, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Melissa Jacobsen
RE: Lifeguard agreement with Norton Shores
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To approve an agreement with the City of Norton Shores
to provide lifeguards at Ross Park
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
A ffirmntlve Action
231 /724-6703
FAX/722- 1214
Assessor
231 /724-6708
FAX/726-5181
Cemetery
231/724-6783
FAX/726-5617
Civil Service
23 1/724-6716
F AX/724-4405 West Michigan's Shoreline City
Clerk
23 I /724-6705
FAX/724-4178
Date: May 6 , 2002
Comm. & Neigh,
Services
231 /724-6717
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
FAX/726-2S01
From : Melissa Jacobsen
Engineering
231/724-6707 Re: Lifeguard agreement with Norton Shores
FAX/727-6904
Finance
23 I /724-67 13
FAX1724-6768
I am requesting approval of the agreement with Norton
Shores to provide lifeguards . This has been a practice
Fire Dept.
23 I /724-6792
of the department for several years. It allows the
F AX/724-6985 Cities to avoid competing for the same staff, while
Income Tax allowing the lifeguards to obtain additional hours of
231/724-6770 work . Norton Shores puts the lifeguards on their
FAX/724-6768
payroll so that the City of Muskegon does not pay them
Info. Systems
231 /724-6744
when they are working at Ross Park, and Norton Shores
FAX/722-4301 pays half of all uniform expenses.
Leisure Service I would ask that you authorize the Mayor and clerk to
231 /724-6704
FAX/724-1196 sign the attached agreement .
Manager's Office
231 /724-6724
FAX/722-1214
Mayor's Omcc
231/724-6701
FAX1722-12 14
lnspecllon Services
231/724-6715
FAX/726-2501
Planning/Zoning
231 /724-6702
FAX/724-6790
Police Dept.
231 /724-6750
FAX/722-5 140
Public Works
231/724-4 100
FAX/722-4 188
Treasurer
231 /724-6720
F AX/724-6768
Water Dilling Dept.
231/724-6718
FAX/724-6768
Water FIitration
231/724-4 106
FAX/755-5290
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, Ml 49443-0536
2002-62(e)
AGREEMENT - - LIFEGUARD SERVICES
The City of Muskegon (Muskegon) and the City of Norton Shores (Norton Shores) in an
effort to assist each other with providing lifeguards at the City of Norton Shores Ross Park, the
City of Muskegon Pere Marquette Park, and the Muskegon School Systems indoor pools have
agreed to work cooperatively. In that capacity, Muskegon and Norton Shores agree to jointly
employ individuals as follows:
1. Joint Obligations. Muskegon and Norton Shores jointly agree to the following
level of services:
1.1 Ross Park shall be operated from the first Friday after Muskegon Public
School dismisses students through Labor Day during the hours of 11 :00 a.m. to 5 :00 p.m., seven
days a week.
1.2 Pere Marquette shall be operated from Memorial Day through Labor Day
during the hours of 11 :00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., seven days a week, with the exception that
lifeguards will only be provided on Saturday and Sunday while Muskegon Public School is in
session.
1.3 Indoor pools at Steel Junior High, Bunker Junior High, and Muskegon
High School, shall be operated as determined annually by Muskegon.
2. City of Muskegon Obligations. Muskegon shall undertake the following:
2.1 Muskegon shall attempt to recruit and hire sufficient number of lifeguards
to provide lifeguards at Ross Park from the hours of 11 :00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. seven days a week
commencing with the first Friday after dismissal of school for the Muskegon Public School
System through Labor Day. During such time periods, the lifeguards shall be paid by Norton
Shores, and shall be considered employees of Norton Shores.
2.2 Muskegon shall acquire and provide necessary clothing, i.e., sweatshirt,
bathing suit, and any other items that Muskegon requires, fot the lifeguards. Muskegon shall bill
Norton Shores one-half of the cost of clothing. Norton Shores retains the right to review any and
all invoices.
2.3 Muskegon shall supervise all lifeguards, including those located at Ross
Park.
2.4 As part of the selecting and screening process for lifeguards, Muskegon
shall insure that the employees have drivers' licenses, have a current certification for first aid,
have a current certification for cardial pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), have a current
certification for lifeguard. Muskegon shall undertake a drug screening test for all applicants. If
G:\EDS I\FILES\00100\1731 \AG\A 71248. DOC
the employee is going to be teaching swimming, Muskegon shall insure that the employee has a
current certification as water safety instructor (WSI).
3. Norton Shores Obligations. Norton Shores agrees as follows:
3.1 Norton Shores shall compensate Muskegon $750, payable on the first of
May each and every year to reimburse Muskegon for expenses relating to the recruitment,
scheduling, and supervising of lifeguards at Ross Park.
3.2 Norton Shores shall pay Muskegon one-half the cost of all clothing
provided by Muskegon to lifeguards. Norton Shores has the right to review and dispute any
invoice.
3.3 Norton Shores recognizes that certain limited information will be obtained
as to applicants, and is free to undertake any additional backgrou.'ld information that it so desires.
Further, Norton Shores recognizes that Muskegon does not make any assurances as to the
training or capabilities of the applicants, except as provided herein.
3.4 Muskegon shall provide a list oflifeguards to Norton Shores. Norton
Shores shall have ten calendar days to reject any employee from the date Muskegon provides the
list to Norton Shores. Norton Shores may reject any lifeguard whom has pied or been convicted
of a non-traffic related civil infraction within the two years immediately preceeding employment,
a misdearnnor within the two years immediately preceding employment, any dishonesty offense
within the five years immediately preceding employment and any sex offense or any felony.
Other than as above provided, Norton Shores shall accept employees on said list.
3 .5 Norton Shores shall defer to Muskegon as to all policies relating to the
lifeguards.
3.6 Norton Shores shall pay lifeguards for working at Ross Park at an hourly
rate to be set by Muskegon. Norton Shores' obligation to pay employees is limited to those hours
employees are working at Ross Park, which corresponds with the hours the lifeguard is an
employee of Norton Shores.
4. Miscellaneous.
4.1 Counterparts. This agreement may be executed simultaneously in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.
4.2 Termination. Either party may terminate this contract on or before
December 15 of each year. If not terminated by that date, both parties are obligated to comply
with this contract until the following December 15, at which point it may be terminated.
4.3 Entire Agreement/Amendments. This agreement sets forth all of the
promises, covenants, agreements, conditions, and undertakings between the parties with respect
G:\EOS I\FILES\00100\1731 \AG\A 71248.DOC
to the subject matter of this agreement and supercedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements
and understandings, inducements, or conditions, express or implied, oral or written, relating to
this matter, except as contained within this agreement. This agreement may not be changed
orally, but only by an agreement in writing, duly executed by or on behalf of the party or parties
against whom enforcement of any waiver, change, modification, consent or discharge is sought.
4.4 Effective Date. This agreement shall be effective immediately upon
execution.
Dated: l7Jo0tt 16 , 2002
CITY OF NORTON SHORES
ByN
~ ~ Craliall,~ Its Mayor d_
Dated: ~l.,U\.,,L I \ , 2002
an~
Lynn~
-ff~)
Its Clerk
G:\EDSI\FILES\00100\ 1731IAGIA71 248.DOC
Date: May 6, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Melissa Jacobse.,+Jr
RE: MDNR Electrical/Utility Upgrade Addendum
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To approve the addendum to the original contract with
the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to complete
phase II of the electrical/utility upgrades at Hartshorn
Marina.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
$320,000 with a 50% local match required for Hartshorn
Marina.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
Match will need to be provided by either a bond or a
loan to be paid off by the marina over several years.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Leisure Services Board recommends approval.
AITTrmutlve Action
231 /724-6703
FAX/722-1214
Assessor
23 I /724-6708
FAX/726-5181
Cemetery
23 I /724-6783
FAX/726-5617
Civil Service
231/724-6716
F AX/724-4405 West Michigan's Shoreline City
Clerk
23 I /724-6705
FAX/724-4178
Comm. & Neigh.
Date: May 6, 2002
Services
23 l /724-67 17 To: Honorable Mayor ~n~ ,City Commissioners
FAX/726-2501
From: Melissa Jacobse~
Engineering
231/724-6707 Re: MDNR Electrical/Utility Upgrade Addendum
FAX/727-6904
Flnancc
231/724-6713
FAX/724-6768 I am requesting approval of the agreement addendum to
the Electrical/Utility Upgrade contract we have with the
Fire Dept,
23 l /724-6792 DNR, and to adopt the attached resolution.
FAX/724-6985
Hartshorn Marina was built over forty years ago, and is
Income Tnx
23 l /724-6770
in need of major electrical improvements. The East side
FAX/724-6768 electrical work was completed this year, and the DNR has
Info. Systems allowed funding to complete the West side work. The
231/724-6744 work has been recommended by The Abonmarche Group in the
FAX/722-430 1
engineering study they completed on the marina in 2001.
Leis ure Service
23 l /724-6704
In the study they stated the "the electric distribution
FAX/724-1196 system within the large boat basin is generally in poor
Manager's Office
condition. Junction and services boxes are corroded and
23 l /724-6724 outdated. Exposed conduit along the bulkhead is
FAX/722-1214
unsupported and broken in places." The cost is
Mayor's OITTce $320,000.00, which would require a fifty percent local
231/724-6701
FAX/722-1214 match equaling $160,000.
Ins pection Services Thank you for your consideration.
231 /724-6715
FAX/726-2501
Plnn nlng/Zonlng
23 l /724-6702
FAX/724-6790
Police Dept.
231 /724-6750
FAX/722-5140
Public Works
231/724-4100
FAX/722-4188
Treosurer
231/724-6720
F AX/724-6768
Water Billing Dept.
231/724-6718
FAX/724-6768
Water Filtration
23 l /724-4106
FAX/755-5290
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, Ml 49443-0536
2002-62([)
AGREEMENT ADDENDUM
Harbors and Docks - Electrical/Utility Upgrade
THIS AGREEMENT ADDENDUM, made this -~J~4t=h~_ day of _c,MaaiY<---~• 2002, by
and between the CITY OF MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to
as the "City", and the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, an agency of the
State of Michigan, hereinafter referred to as the "Department".
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2001, an agreement was entered into between the Department and
City, to upgrade the electrical/utility service at the City of Muskegon Marina under provisions of the
State's Waterways Grant-in-Aid Mooring Program; and
WHEREAS, additional project funding to provide for the second phase of the upgrade of
electrical service at the City of Muskegon .Hartshorn marina facility, in conjunction with the original
agreement project work, has been requested;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained
herein, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. The Department agrees to grant to the City an additional sum of money equal to Fifty
(50%) percent of the total additional project work. This additional grant amount shall not in any event
exceed one hundred sixty thousand dollars ($160,000.00). Said total grant-in-aid for the project shall
not exceed two hundred sixty-eight thousand dollars ($268,000.00). These monies shall be used only
for the project work outlined in the Agreement and this Addendum and related engineering costs.
2. The City agrees to immediately appropriate the sum of one hundred sixty thousand
dollars ($160,000.00). This sum represents fifty (50%) percent of the total cost of the additional
project work called for by this Agreement Addendum. Any additional funds needed to complete the
project work shall be provided by the City. The City must have the prior written approval of the
Department for any change orders to the contract(s) In cost, plans or specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seal the
day and date first above written.
WITNESSES:
Title: Ma or
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES
By:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Rodney A. Stokes, Chief
Parks and Recreation Bureau
RESOLUTION
2002-62(f)
Upon Motion made by Vice-Mayor R11i e , seconded by Comm Scbwei fl er , the following
Resolution was adopted:
"RESOLVED, that the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Michigan does hereby accept the
terms of the Agreement Addendum as received from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources,
and the City does hereby specifically agree, but not by way of limitation, as follows:
1. To appropriate the sum of one hundred sixty thousand dollars ($160,000.00), to match the
grant authorized by the Department.
2. To maintain satisfactory financial accounts, documents, and records and to make them
available to the Department for auditing at reasonable limes.
3. To construct the facility improvements and provide such funds, services, and materials as
may be necessary to satisfy the terms of the said Agreement Addendum.
4. To comply with any and all terms of the said Agreement Addendum including all terms not
specifically set forth in the foregoing portions of the Resolution."
The following aye votes were recorded: - ~ -
The following nay votes were recorded: - ~ -
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
) §
MUSKEGON COUNTY )
I, Gail A. Kundinger , Clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County,
Michigan, do hereby certify that the a.bove is a true and correct copy of the Resolution relative to the
Agreement with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, which Resolution was adopted by
the City Council at a meeting held M 14 , 2002.
Dated: May 14, 2002
2002-62(f)
AGREEMENT ADDENDUM
Harbors and Docks - Electrical/Utility Upgrade
THIS AGREEMENT ADDENDUM, made this 14th day of May , 2002, by
and between the CITY OF MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to
as the "City", and the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, an agency of the
State of.Michigan, hereinafter referred to as the "Department".
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2001, an agreement was entered into between the Department and
City, to upgrade the electrical/utility service at the City of Muskegon Marina under provisions of the
State's Waterways Grant-in-Aid Mooring Program; and
WHEREAS, additional project funding to provide for the second phase of the upgrade of
electrical service at the City of Muskegon Hartshorn marina facility, in conjunction with the original
agreement project work, has been requested;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained
herein, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. The Department agrees to grant to the City an additional sum of money equal to FiflY
(50%) percent of the total additional project work. This additional grant amount shall not in any event
exceed one hundred sixty thousand dollars ($160,000.00). Said total grant-in-aid for the project shall
not exceed two hundred sixty-eight thousand dollars ($268,000.00). These monies shall be used only
for the project work outlined in the Agreement and this Addendum and related engineering costs.
2. The City agrees to immediately appropriate the sum of one hundred sixty ·thousand
dollars ($160,000.00). This sum represents fifty (50%) percent of the total cost of the additional
project work called for by this Agreement Addendum. Any additional funds needed to complete the
project work shall be provided by the City. The City must have the prior written approval of the
Department for any change orders to the contract(s) in cost,_plans or specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seal the
day.and date first above written.
W!TNESSES:
./otf'f'r
~ - ~rnl}U-/1=
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES
By:. ~dwd!C
Re~Aey-A.-Stol<es;-Gaiet Lowen Schuett, Acting Chie
Parks and Recreation Bureau
RESOLUTION
2002-62([)
Upon Motion made by Vj ce-Mayor Allie , seconded by Comm Scbwei fl er , the following
Resolution was adopted:
"RESOLVED, that the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County, Michigan does hereby accept the
terms of the Agreement Addendum as received from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources,
and the City does hereby specifically agree, but not by way of limitation, as follows:
1. To appropriate the sum of one hundred sixty thousand dollars ($160,000.00}, to match the
grant authorized by the Department.
2. To maintain satisfactory financial accounts, documents, and records and to make them
available to the Department for auditing at reasonable times.
3. To construct the facility improvements and provide such funds, services, and materials as
may be necessary to satisfy the terms of the said Agreement Addendum.
- ,,: To comply with any and all terms of the said Agreement Addendum including all terms not
specifically set forth in the foregoing portions of the Resolution."
The following aye votes were recorded: __J__
The following nay votes were recorded: _ a _
STATE OF MICHIGAN }
) §
MUSKEGON COUNTY }
I, Gail A. Kundinger , Clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon County,
Michigan, do hereby certify that the a.bove is a true and correct copy of the Resolution relative to the
Agreement with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, which Resolution was adopted by
the City Council at a meeting held M 1 2002.
~M-o~oLh,)
City Clerk cJ
Dated: May 14, 2002
Commission Meeting Date: May 14, 2002
Date: May 7, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor & City Commission
From: Community and Neighborhood Services
Department W G l
RE: Approval of Lead Based Paint Abatement
Contract for house at 322 Amity
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the contract with Success
Enterprise, LTD 5263 Apple Ave, Muskegon, Ml for the Lead-Based
Paint Abatement at 322 Amity for $24,050.
The City of Muskegon obtained the structure at 322 Amity through the
foreclosure process.
After the lead-base paint abatement process is completed, the structure
will be totally rehabilitated and marketed to a qualified family for
homeownership.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding will be allocated from the 2000 HOME
funds that were budgeted for lead-based paint abatement.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the contract with Success
Enterprise, LTD for $24,050.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Land Reutilization Committee
approved the rehabilitation of the structure.
Success Enterprise, Ltd.
5263 Apple Avenue
Muskegon, Michigan 49442
Phone: (231) 788-1570 or 788-6662
Fax: (231) 788-6342
BID FOR LEAD ABATEMENT
322 AMITY AVENUE
WINDOWS_.
1. a. Replace all windows with white vinyl double hung windows with screens.
b. Encapsulate sills and casings or any framing around the window
c. Encapsulate with Lead Lock and clean with Tri- Sodium Phosphate
d. Haul all debris away at risk level #1 & 3.
e. Hepa vacuum to comply clearance.
Number of windows 17 Total window cost $_,7'---',_,,,2_,,,2"'5"".0"'0"------
DOORS
2. a. Replace entry door and frame with 1 3/4" steel door. Replacement doors are steel pre-
hung with oak sills.
b. Paint frame and brick mold or casing white.
c. Haul all debris away at risk level # 1 & 3.
d. Install new brass handle with dead bolt, all doors to be keyed alike.
Number of doors 2 Total door cost $ ____,1"'6,c:O,,_0,,_.,_,0,_,0'----------
SIDING
3. a. Tear off existing siding.
b. Side home with vinyl 4 x 4 lap siding.
c. Celetex fanfold entire home.
d. Install aluminum soffit fascia.
e. Aluminum wrap all exterior framing of door and windows.
f. Encapsulate all other exposed area with Lead Lock.
g. Haul all debris away at risk level# 1, 3 & 4.
h. Full abatement activity in progress. Home to be a lead contaminated site.
i. Encapsulate front porch entry.
Siding and soffit Yes Total siding/soffit cost$ 14,700.00
Full Risk Assessment $250.00
Full Clearance Assessment $275.00
Total cost of lead abatement of windows/doors/siding $ _2=4~,0~5~0~·~0~0_ _ _ __
/
-----
LEAD BASE PAINT ABATEMENT AGREEMENT
This Lead Abatement Construction Agreement made as of the 17th day of May 2002
between the City of Muskegon (the "Owner") and Success Enterprise, Ltd. ("Lead Abatement
Contractor").
BACKGROUND
A. Lead Abatement Contractor (LAC) and Owner agree that LAC shall abate the lead
based paint hazards in the Bid Proposal for 322 Amity a single family residence (the "Residence")
attached as Exhibit C pursuant to the Infill Program, according to terms of this Agreement.
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Price. The price for Lead Abatement Construction shall be Twenty Four Thousand
Fifty Dollars $ 24,050.00("Price"). The Price may change in the event the LAC and Owner,
agree to change orders, modifications or extras, as defined below, in writing and signed by all
the above.
2. Costs Included. The Price shall include the cost of the building permit and all sales
taxes incutTed by Lead Abatement Contractor for materials purchased and installed in the Residence.
The Price shall not include any other costs whatsoever associated with the construction of the
Residence, including, but not limited to, utility bills, heating costs, sewer or water hook-up charges,
trunkage fees, regional fees, or any other water, sewer or property tax assessments, each of which
shall be Purchaser's sole responsibility.
3. Payment of the Price. The Price shall be paid in accordance with the following
schedule ("Payment Schedule").
LAC may request draws from City of Muskegon acting as escrow agent. Draws may
be requested no more than once per month. Requests for draws and documentation required will be
in a format acceptable to the City, and shall include at a minimum lien waivers. The total amount
of a draw may never exceed the percentage of completion, less a 10% holdback. The balance owed
on the contract, including any holdback, shall be paid upon satisfactory results from a Full Clearance
Assessment.
4. Modifications/Extras. No modifications to the Plans ("Modifications") or requests
for additional construction ("Extras") shall be binding upon either party, unless the Modifications
and/or Extras are set forth on a written change order that is signed by Lead Abatement Contractor
and, City of Muskegon. The Change Order must provide a detailed description of the Modifications
and/or Extras and the cost or credit to be charged. Where a Change Order increases or decreases the
Price ("Adjusted Price"), the Adjusted Price shall be paid according to the remaining portion of the
Payment Schedule.
A:\SUCCESS & CITY CONTRACT.DOC
Page 1
5. Possession. Purchaser shall be entitled to possession of the Residence upon payment
of the Price or Adjusted Price in full. Upon payment in full, Lead Abatement Contractor shall
deliver to Owner a Full Clearance Assessment at contractor's expense a completed sworn statement
and a full unconditional waiver of lien. Payment of the Price or Adjusted Price by Purchaser shall
constitute the acceptance of the Residence.
6. Estimated Completion Date. Lead Abatement Contractor shall commence
construction of the Residence within 30days from the date the parties sign this agreement
("Commencement Date"). Lead Abatement Contractor shall endeavor to complete the Residence
within :l: weeks of the Commencement Date ("Completion Date"). Provided, that both the
Commencement Date and the Completion Date may be extended as a result of circumstances beyond
the control of General Contractor, including, but not limited to, delays caused by suppliers or
subcontractors, delays for utility hook-ups, Acts of God, labor disputes, governmental inspections,
regulations, or permit processes, material back orders, Purchaser's requests for Change Orders, fire,
injury or disability to General Contractor or weather.
7. General Contractor Conditions. This Agreement is subject to and includes all of
the Contractor Conditions attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A.
General Contractor - Success Builders
Dated: __________ By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Its: Builder
Owner- City of Muskegon
Dated: - - - - - - - By:-----------'-----
Wilmem G. Griffin
It's: Director
Witness
Dated: ___________ By:-------------
TaLonda Robinson
A:\SUCCESS & CITY CONTRACT.DOC
Page2
EXHIBIT A
Contractor CONDITIONS
1. General Contractor's Warranties. All building materials used in the construction of
the Residence shall be new. General Contractor guarantees its workmanship for a period of one year
from the date of final completion. Within that period, General Contractor may replace, at its option, any
materials incorporated into the Residence which are defective, provided the manufacturer's warranty is
still in full force and effect and, in fact, the manufacturer honors that warranty. To make a claim under
this warranty, Purchaser must give General Contractor written notice of any such defect in the
workmanship and/or materials promptly upon discovery and not later than expiration of the one year
warranty period. This warranty does not apply to workmanship or materials requiring repair or
replacement because of normal wear and tear or natural.settling. General Contractor shall turn over and
transfer to Purchaser all manufacturer's warranties that are delivered directly to General Contractor by
the manufacturer. All warranties under this agreement shall transfer upon the date of sale to Buyer as the
Purchaser's successor in interest.
2. Purchaser's Warranties. Purchaser covenants and warrants that the Property is subject
to a binding purchase agreement. Purchaser shall locate the exact location of the Residence on the
Property. All corners of Residence shall be clearly marked with surveyor stakes. Purchaser covenants
and agrees that such location is in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local rules and
regulations, including, but not limited to, building restrictions, set-back requirements, sand dune and
wetland laws, and regulations and zoning ordinances. In the event the location of the Residence is
moved for any reason, General Contractor expressly reserves the right to increase the Price accordingly
to the extent and in such amounts as the new location increases the cost to General Contractor.
3. License. General Contractor is a residential General Contractor and a residential
maintenance and alteration contractor and is required to be licensed under article 24 of Act 299 of the
Public Acts of 1980, as amended, being sections 339.2401 to 399.2412 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
An electrician is required to he licensed under Act No. 217 of the Public Acts of 1956, as amended,
being sections 338.881 to 338.892 of the Michigan Compiled Laws. A Plumber is required to be
licensed under Act No. 266 of the Public Acts of 1929, as amended being sections 338.901 to 338.917 of
the Michigan Compiled Laws. General Contractor is licensed by the State of Michigan as a licensed
Michigan Contractor and maintains its license in good standing. General Contractor's License and ID
numbers are _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , respectively.
4. Laws, Ordinances and Regulations. In.connection with the construction of the
Residence, General Contractor shall meet and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and
regulations.
5. Notice of Commencement. Purchaser shall deliver a Notice of Commencement in
accordance with the Michigan Construction Lien Act within ten days of this Agreement.
6. Diligent Pursuit. General Contractor shall diligently pursue its obligations under this
Agreement. If Purchaser believes that General Contractor has failed to comply with this paragraph, it
shall provide General Contractor not less than 15 days written notice of such non-compliance, a list of
Purchaser's specific complaints, and a reasonable time within which General Contractor shall cure any
such reasonable complaints. Until Purchaser fully complies with the notice provisions set forth in this
A:\SUCCESS & CITY CONTRACT.DOC
Page 3
paragraph, Purchaser may not replace General Contractor with any other party to complete construction
and may not deduct from the Price any amount paid by Purchaser to complete construction in accordance
with the Plans.
7. Insurance. Purchaser shall procure and maintain an "all risk" insurance policy and shall
name General Contractor as an additional named insured. Purchaser shall provide General Contractor
with evidence of such insurance upon request. General Contractor shall maintain a policy of General
Contractor's insurance fully insuring the Residence from the date construction commences until the date
of substantial completion. Purchaser and their mottgagee may also maintain a policy of insurance upon
their interest in the Residence. General Contractor shall also carry public liability insurance with
coverage limits not less than $300,000 single-limit coverage and worker's compensation insurance in an
amount not less than the statutory minimum. Such policies shall name Purchaser and their mortgagee as
additional named insured. General Contractor shall provide Purchaser with evidence of such insurance
upon request. Purchaser and General Contractor waive all rights against each other for damages caused
by fire or other perils to the extent covered by insurance provided under this paragraph.
8. Miscellaneous.
9.1 Applicable Law. This Agreement is executed in, shall be governed by, and
construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan.
9.2 Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of,
and be enforceable by the patties and their respective legal representatives, successors, and
assigns.
9.3 Full Execution. This Agreement requires the signature of both parties. Until
fully executed on a single copy or in counterparts, this Agreement is of no binding force or
effect, and if not fully executed, this Agreement is void.
9.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original as against ai1y party whose signature appears thereon,
and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement shall
become binding upon the parties when one or more counterparts, individually or taken together,
shall bear the signatures of all parties.
9.5 Non-Waiver. No waiver by any party of any provision of this Agreement shall
constitute a waiver by snch patty of such provision on any other occasion or a waiver by such
party of any other provision of the Agreement. ·
9.6 Severability. Should any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement be
determined to be invalid, unlawful, or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality, and
enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in at1y way be impaired or affected.
9.7 No Discrimination. Discrimination on the basis ofreligion, race, creed, color,
national origin, age, sex, marital status, or handicapped condition by either party in respect to the
construction of the Residence is prohibited.
9.8 Assignment or Delegation. Neither General Contractor nor Purchaser may
assign all or any part of this Agreement. Provided, that General Contractor may delegate all or
any part of its obligations to perform the services under this Agreement, to any persons or
A:ISUCCESS & CITY CONTRACT.DOC
Page 4
entities that General Contractor, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, including sub-
contractors. Such delegation shall be at the sole expense of General Contractor unless otherwise
provided.
9.9 Notices. All required or permitted written notices shall be deemed effective and
duly given when: (i) personally delivered; (ii) sent by fax; (iii) one day after depositing in the
custody of a nationally recognized receipted overnight delivery service; or (iv) two days after
posting in the U.S. first class, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the recipient party
at the address as set forth at the outset of this Agreement, or to such other address as the recipient
party shall have furnished to the sender in accordance with the requirements for the giving of
notice.
9.10 Pronouns. For convenience, Purchaser has been referred to this Agreement
sometimes in the singular and at other times in the plural.
Lead Abatement Contractor -
Success Enterprise, Ltd.
Dated: _ _ _ _ ___, _ __
Success Enterprise Owner
Owner -
Dated: IZly ,2/ , ;l.ooc:2
Dated: 72Jy o</ , ,:}00 ,;l.
A:\SUCCESS & CITY CONTRACT.DOC
Page 5
Commission Meeting Date: May 14, 2002
Date: May 7, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor & City Commission
From: Community and Neighborhood Services
Department
RE: Approval of Contract for Final Phase of Jackson
Hill Infill Project Operation Rejuve-Nation A.K.A.
Operation J-Hill
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the contract with Bantam Group
1290 Wood of Muskegon for the completion of the final Infill project in
the Jackson Hill Neighborhood at a cost of $115,528.
The home will be built at 428 Marquette the site where until recently a
blighted structure stood. The City has demolished the previous blighted
structure and construction on the new home will start immediately if
approved by Commission.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for the construction of the structure has
been budgeted from 2001 HOME funding.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the contract with the Bantam
Group of Muskegon for the final phase of Operation Rejuve-Nation A. K.
A. Operation J-Hill at a cost of $115,528.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Land Reutilization Committee
approved the project.
c))
J-,
~:,
('
~ "--
8
d Oo
~ ~
~
Oo
j ~
(/l
.0
C
Ill
ol
,,
0
m
(/l
(")
::0
ih
ill.:
·-" . I
0
....0
Ill
"U
-I
0
·~r...,,,
·o>
~
~
;:»
(0 z
~
_.
.IS,
_.
.IS,
0s--- -
:VAVlTEO l'.;:EUHQ
.c:
ts
·z
m~
.-I ~
:1
.,_ ___ ~
.,,[
-t
i5
+
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
This Residential Construction Agreement is made as of the 10th day of May, 2002
between City of Muskegon (the "Owner"), Edgar & Mashia Watson (the "Purchaser") and
Bantam Group Inc ("General Contractor").
BACKGROUND
A. General Contractor and Purchaser agree that General Contractor shall construct a
single family residence (the "Residence") for Purchaser pursuant to the Infill Program, according
to terms of this Agreement.
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
I. Building Site. Owner has signed a binding purchase agreement with Purchaser to
give a building site located on the real estate located at 428 Marquette (Vacant Land} and
legally described on Exhibit B (the "Property"). Owner has agreed to hire General Contractor to
build the Residence on the Property.
2. The Residence. General Contractor shall build the Residence in accordance with
the plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit C (the "Plans"). Any features
of the Residence that are not explicitly described in the Plans shall be determined in the sole
discretion of General Contractor. For example, unless specifically set forth on the Plans, the
location of all electrical outlets shall be as determined by General Contractor.
3. Price. The price for constructing the Residence shall be $115,528 ("Price"). The
Price may change in the event Owner and General Contractor and/or Purchaser, agree to
change orders, modifications or extras, as defined below, in writing and signed by all the
above.
3.1 The price is based on certain allowances. Allowances are merely
estimates of costs for items to be added to the Residence at Purchaser's and Owner's
discretion, such as carpeting, light fixtures, window treatments, etc. The allowances used
in determining the Price are set forth on Exhibit D. The Price will increase or decrease
depending on the actual cost of the items listed as allowances. In the event the actual cost
of any allowance exceeds the estimated amount (" Additional Allowance Amount"),
Purchaser shall pay the Additional Allowance Amount within 30 days of General
Contractor's invoice. No Additional Allowance Amount shall be billed through General
Contractor without the express prior written consent of Owner.
4. Costs Included.· The Price shall include the cost of the building permit and all
sales taxes incurred by General Contractor for materials purchased and installed in the
Residence, but shall exclude sales tax for those items purchased either by General Contractor or
Purchaser as an allowance. The Price shall not include any other costs whatsoever associated
with the construction of the Residence, including, but not limited to, utility bills, heating costs,
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
Page I
sewer or water hook-up charges, trunkage fees, regional fees, or any other water, sewer or
property tax assessments, each of which shall be Purchaser's sole responsibility.
5. Payment of the Price. The Price shall be paid in accordance with the following
schedule ("Payment Schedule").
General Contractor may request draws from Transnation Title Insurance Co.
("Transnation"), which is acting as escrow agent. Draws may be requested no more than once
per month. Requests for draws and documentation required will be in a format acceptable
Transnation, and shall include at a minimum lien waivers. The total amount of a draw may never
exceed the percentage of completion, less a 10% holdback. The balance owed on the contract,
including any holdback, shall be paid upon completion and issuance of a certificate of
occupancy.
6. Modifications/Extras. No modifications to the Plans ("Modifications") or
requests for additional construction ("Extras") shall be binding upon either party, unless the
Modifications and/or Extras are set forth on a written change order that is signed by General
Contractor, Purchaser of Muskegon ("Purchaser"), and Owner ("Change Order"). The Change
Order must provide a detailed description of the Modifications and/or Extras and the cost or
credit to be charged. Where a Change Order increases or decreases the Price ("Adjusted Price"),
the Adjusted Price shall be paid according to the remaining portion of the Payment Schedule.
7. Possession. Purchaser shall be entitled to possession of the Residence upon
payment of the Price or Adjusted Price in full. Upon payment in full, General Contractor shall
deliver to Purchaser a completed sworn statement and a full unconditional waiver of lien.
Payment of the Price or Adjusted Price by Purchaser shall constitute the acceptance of the
Residence.
8. Estimated Completion Date. General Contractor shall commence construction
of the Residence within 30 days from the date the parties sign this agreement June 20, 2002
("Commencement Date"). General Contractor shall endeavor to complete the Residence by
September 30, 2002("Completion Date"). Provided, that both the Commencement Date and the
Completion Date may be extended as a result of circumstances beyond the control of General
Contractor, including, but not limited to, delays caused by suppliers or subcontractors, delays for
utility hook-ups, Acts of God, labor disputes, governmental inspections, regulations, or permit
processes, material back orders, Purchaser's requests for Change Orders, fire, injury or disability
to General Contractor or weather.
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
Page 2
8. General Contractor Conditions. This Agreement is subject to and includes all
of the Contractor Conditions attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A.
Its: Mayor
By: ~do, lttliA,
L illtla fort-<",,.
Its: /),pu ~ Clerk
General Contractor - Bantam Group Inc
, ZooL By: tii~
Michae!J. A.Amrhein
Its: Owner
Purchaser - Edgar & Mashia Watson
Edgar Watson SS# fdtr-,-fW~~
3?!-1 G-s'J-S-S-
Mashia Watson SS# A, a.,.i.,-'i .'~
s 2-. -,-r.J -s-1-.s.~3
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
Contractor CONDITIONS
1. General Contractor's Warranties. All building materials used in the construction of
the Residence shall be new. General Contractor guarantees its workmanship for a period of one year
from the date of final completion. Within that period, General Contractor may replace, at its option, any
materials incorporated into the Residence which are defective, provided the manufacturer's wan-anty is
still in full force and effect and, in fact, the manufacturer honors that warranty. To make a claim under
this warranty, Purchaser must give General Contractor written notice of any such defect in the
workmanship and/or materials promptly upon discovery and not later than expiration of the one year
warranty period. This warranty does not apply to workmanship or materials requiring repair or
replacement because of normal wear and tear or natural settling. General Contractor shall turn over and
transfer to Purchaser all manufacturer's warranties that ;tre delivered directly to General Contractor by
the manufacturer. All warranties under this agreement shall transfer upon the date of sale to Buyer as the
Purchaser's successor in interest.
2. Purchaser's Warranties. Purchaser covenants and warrants that the Property is subject
to a binding purchase agreement. Purchaser shall locate the exact location of the Residence on the
Property. All corners of Residence shall be clearly marked with surveyor stakes. Purchaser covenants
and agrees that such location is in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local rules and
regulations, including, but not limited to, building restrictions, set-back requirements, sand dune and
wetland laws, and regulations and zoning ordinances. In the event the location of the Residence is
moved for any reason, General Contractor expressly reserves the right to increase the Price accordingly
to the extent and in such amounts as the new location increases the cost to General Contractor.
3. License. General Contractor is a residential General Contractor and a residential
maintenance and alteration contractor and is required to be licensed under article 24 of Act 299 of the
Public Acts of 1980, as amended, being sections 339.2401 to 399.2412 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
An electrician is required to be licensed under Act No. 217 of the Public Acts of 1956, as amended,
being sections 338.881 to 338.892 of the Michigan Compiled Laws. A Plumber is required to be
licensed under Act No. 266 of the Public Acts of 1929, as amended being sections 338.901 to 338.917 of
the Michigan Compiled Laws. General Contractor is licensed by the State of Michigan as a licensed
Michigan Contractor and maintains its license in good standing. General Contractor's License and ID
numbers are 2102155592 and 5293297, respectively.
4. Laws, Ordinances and Regulations. In connection with the construction of the
Residence, General Contractor shall meet and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and
regulations.
5. Notice of Commencement. Purchaser shall deliver a Notice of Commencement in
accordance with the Michigan Construction Lien Act within ten days of this Agreement.
6. Diligent Pnrsnit. General Contractor shall diligently pursue its obligations under this
Agreement. If Purchaser believes that General Contractor has failed to comply with this paragraph, it
shall provide General Contractor not less than 15 days written notice of such non-compliance, a list of
Purchaser's specific complaints, and a reasonable time within which General Contractor shall cure any
such reasonable complaints. Until Purchaser fully complies with the notice provisions set forth in this
paragraph, Purchaser may not replace General Contractor with any other party to complete construction
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
Page 1
and may not deduct from the Price any amount paid by Purchaser to complete construction in accordance
with the Plans.
7. Insurance. Purchaser shall procure and maintain an "all risk" insurance policy and shall
name General Contractor as an additional named insured. Purchaser shall provide General Contractor
with evidence of such insurance upon request. General Contractor shall maintain a policy of General
Contractor's insurance fully insuring the Residence from the date construction commences until the date
of substantial completion. Purchaser and their mortgagee may also maintain a policy of insurance upon
their interest in the Residence. General Contractor shall also carry public liability insurance with
coverage limits not less than $300,000 single-limit coverage and worker's compensation insurance in an
amount not less than the statutory minimum. Such policies shall name Purchaser and their mortgagee as
additional named insured. General Contractor shall provide Purchaser with evidence of such insurance
upon request. Purchaser and General Contractor waive all rights against each other for damages caused
by fire or other perils to the extent covered by insurance provided under this paragraph.
8. Miscellaneous.
9.1 Applicable Law. This Agreement is executed in, shall be governed by, and
construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan.
9.2 Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of,
and be enforceable by the parties and their respective legal representatives, successors, and
assigns.
9.3 Full Execution. This Agreement requires the signature of both patties. Until
fully executed on a single copy or in counterparts, this Agreement is of no binding force or
effect, and if not fully executed, this Agreement is void.
9 .4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original as against any pmty whose signature appears thereon,
and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement shall
become binding upon the parties when one or more counterparts, individually or taken together,
shall bear the signatures of all parties.
9.5 Non-Waiver. No waiver by any party of any provision of this Agreement shall
constitute a waiver by such party of such provision on any other occasion or a waiver by such
party of any other provision of the Agreement.
9.6 Severability. Should any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement be
determined to be invalid, unlawful, or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality, and
enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in m1y way be impaired or affected.
9.7 No Discrimination. Discrimination on the basis ofreligion, race, creed, color,
national origin, age, sex, marital status, or handicapped condition by either party in respect to the
construction of the Residence is prohibited.
9.8 Assignment or Delegation. Neither General Contractor nor Purchaser may
assign all or any part of this Agreement. Provided, that General Contractor may delegate all or
any part of its obligations to perform the services under this Agreement, to any persons or
entities that General Contractor, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, including sub-
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
Page 2
contractors. Such delegation shall be at the sole expense of General Contractor unless otherwise
provided.
9.9 Notices. All required or permitted written notices shall be deemed effective and
dnly given when: (i) personally delivered; (ii) sent by fax; (iii) one day after depositing in the
custody of a nationally recognized receipted overnight delivery service; or (iv) two days after
posting in the U.S. first class, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the recipient party
at the address as set forth at the outset of this Agreement, or to such other address as the recipient
party shall have furnished to the sender in accordance with the requirements for the giving of
notice.
9.10 Pronouns. For convenience, Purchaser has been referred to this Agreement
sometimes in the singular and at other times in the plural.
General Contractor - Bantam Group
\.,1,1
~·Mt
s ')
Dated: !J\/J,V\ ti) By:
I Michael J. A. Amrhein
Its: Owner
Purchaser -Edgar & Mashia Watson
t~mfbt;iF
Edgar Watson
Dated: .-2.0 .f~\ IL\JI
. fsses -
Wit~ .· ,
. -~ff~/';
l!
L
/~'
neata Bailey, City of Muskegon
9t /) _
Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Napoleon Brown, Ciggzree's Inc.
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
Page 3
EXHIBITB
Legal Description
The East 34 ½ feet of Lot 12, Block 11, revised plat of the City of Muskegon, according to the
recorded plat thereof as recorded in Liber 3 of Plats, page 71, Muskegon County Records
And
The East 12 feet of Lot 11 and the West 31 ½ feet of Lot 12, Block 11, revised plat of the City of
Muskegon, according to the recorded plat thereof as recorded in Liber 3 of plats, page 71,
Muskegon County Records
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
EXHIBITC
Plans and Specifications
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
EXHIBITD
Allowances
The Price is based on the following allowances:
A:\CON-AGREE-BANTAM & WATSON.DOC
5-08-2002 2, 43PM FROM BROOKF!ELD'PARK"CONO 2317986497 P.2
inc.
CITY 01' MUSKEGON
IN-PILL HOUSING PROGRAM
ALLOWANCES
Material Allowance Purchase at:
1. Lowe's Home Center
2035 E. Sherman
739-1100
Contaet: Mike.Radman
2. Menard's
Electrical Fi~tures $600.00 5487 Harvey Street
798-8900
V
3. Home Depot
2699 Henry Street
755-0440
Front Door Lock $75.00 ·See Above
l. :Solema Lwnber Co.
1230 E. Laketon
Flooring $3600.00 773·3391
Contac-t: Nick Bolema
1 . · KeQnQ Lumber
Cabinetry $4000.00 346 w. Laketon
& 755-5213
Countertops Contact: Kurt
Color Selections:
Material: Purchase at:
1. Vinyl Siding Color: 1. Keene Lumber.
2. Roof Shingie Color: 346 w. Laketon
3. Shutters Color: .. 755-5213
Contact:Kur't
Utility Selections:
(check one)
·Dryer: Range:
• Gas • Gas
• Electric • Electric
Sign up for City of Muskegon Emails