View the PDF version Google Docs PDF Viewer
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
JUNE 11, 2002
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS@ 5:30 P.M.
AGENDA
• CALL TO ORDER:
• PRAYER:
• PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
• ROLL CALL:
• HONORS AND AWARDS:
• PRESENTATIONS:
• CONSENT AGENDA:
a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK
b. Fireworks Display at Summer Celebration Concert. CITY CLERK
c. Consideration of Bids, Houston Ave. from Third to First.
ENGINEERING
d. Approval of Economic Development Revolving Fund Program
Policies and Guidelines PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
e. Adoption of Michigan Vehicle Code. POLICE
f. Light Fixture & Exit Signs Replacement in the basement a City Hall.
ENGINEERING
g. Shoreline Drive East Rail Purchase. ENGINEERING
• PUBLIC HEARINGS:
• COMMUNICATIONS:
• CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
• UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
• NEW BUSINESS:
a. TEDF Category F-Grant Applications. ENGINEERING
b. Black Creek Road Project. ENGINEERING
c. Request for Proposals for Buildable Large Vacant Parcel at the
Northeast Corner of Marquette and Getty. PLANNING &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
d. Extension of time - Fisherman's landing Reloction. CITY MANAGER
e. Concurrence With the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish the Following:
1. 1961 Leahy
2. 2082 Estes
3. 318 E. Apple
4. 1836 Nevada
5. 1458 Sixth
6. 1715 Superior
f. MOU Agreement with MDOT for the Construction of Shoreline Drive
East. ENGINEERING
g. Traffic Signal Support Pole Painting. CITY MAQNAGER
h. Employment Agreement between the city of Muskegon and Bryon
L. Mazade. CITY MANAGER
• ANY OTHER BUSINESS:
• PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
• CLOSED SESSION: To discuss pending litigation
• Reminder: Individuals who would like to address the City Commission shall do the following:
• Be recognized by the Chair.
• Step forward to the microphone,
• State name and address.
• Limit of 3 minutes to address the Commission.
• {Speaker representing a group may be allowed l O minutes if previously registered with Cify Clerk.)
• ADJOURNMENT:
ADA POLICY: THE CITY OF MUSKEGON WILL PROVIDE NECESSARY AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS WHO WANT TO
ATTEND THE MEETING UPON TWENTY FOUR HOUR NOTICE TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGON. PLEASE CONTACT GAIL A. KUNDINGER,
CITY CLERK, 933 TERRACE STREET, MUSKEGON, Ml 49440 OR BY CALLING (231) 724-6705 OR TOO: (231) 724-4172.
Date: June 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
RE: Approval of Minutes
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the minutes of the Special
Commission Meeting that was held on Tuesday, May 21, 2002, and the
Regular Commission Meeting that was held on Tuesday, May 28, 2002.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the minutes.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
JUNE 11, 2002
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS@ 5:30 P.M.
MINUTES
The Regular Commission Meeting of the City of Muskegon was held at City of Muskegon
was held at the City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan at 5:30pm, Tuesday June
11, 2002.
Mayor Warmington opened the meeting with a prayer from Pastor Bierenga of the Allen
Ave. Christian Reformed Church, after which members of the City Commission and members
of the public joined in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL FOR THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING:
Present: Mayor Stephen Warmington; Vice-Mayor Karen Buie: Commissioners Stephen
Gawron, William Larson, Robert Schweifler, and Lawrence Spataro; City Manager Bryon
Mazade, · City Attorney Thomas Johnson and City Clerk Gail Kundinger. Excused:
Commissioner Clara Shepherd.
2002-69 HONORS AND AWARDS: Vice Mayor Buie presented a Proclamation to Keisha
Martinez, Mrs. Muskegon County 2002, congratulating her for her accomplishments in the
Mrs. International Competition.
2002-70 INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATION: Ken James from Affirmative Action introduced the
Julia Hackley Fund interns for 2002.
2002-71 CONSENT AGENDA:
a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the minutes of the Special Commission Meeting that
was held on Tuesday, May 21, 2002, and the Regular Commission Meeting that was held
on Tuesday, May 28, 2002.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the minutes.
b. Fireworks Display at Summer Celebration Concert. CITY CLERK
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rachel Kane is requesting approval of a fireworks display for the
July 2, 2002, 'Nickelback' concert at the Muskegon Summer Celebration. Fire Marshall
Metcalf has reviewed the request and recommends approval contingent on inspection
of the fireworks. Risk Management has approved the insurance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval contingent on inspection of the fireworks.
c. Consideration of Bids. Houston Ave from Third to First. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The reconstruction of Houston from 3rd to Js 1 contract (H-1542),
including the watermain, be awarded to Lakeside Construction out of Grand Haven since
they were the lowest (see bid tabulation) responsible bidder with a bid price of
$104,276.75.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The construction cost of $104,276.75 plus associated engineering cost
which is estimated at an additional 15%.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Award the contract to Lakeside Construction.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
d. Approval of Economic Development Revolving Fund Program Policies
and Guidelines. PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt the amended policy for the Economic Development
Revolving Fund Program.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the policy.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Community Relations Committee recommended
adoption of the policy at their June 3, 2002 meeting.
e. Adoption of Michigan Vehicle Code. POLICE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt the Michigan Vehicle Code by reference.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the ordinance
f. Light Fixture & Exit Signs Replacement in the basement at City Hall.
ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Authorization to enter into a $16,970 contract with Belasco
Electric, out of Muskegon, to replace a total of 177 outdated fixtures in the basement of
City Hall with a TB lamp & electronic ballast in accordance with the recommendation
outlined in the energy analysis report prepared by Tower Pinkster Titus Associates earlier
this year. According to the report, the fixture replacement will have a 5.72 years payback
and an expected life of 25 years.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost of $16,970
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. The cost will come out of the City Hall
budget and any necessary revision, if one becomes necessary, will be reflected on a
future quarterly update.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve a contract with Belasco.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
g. Shoreline Drive East Rail Purchase. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Authorize the sole source purchase of 7,542.9 feet of rails
necessary to construct the new railroad as part of the proposed Shoreline Dr. East for a
total cost of $72,439.44 in accordance with the City/CSX agreement which was executed
back in 1999. The rails will be sold to the successful contractor.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost of purchasing the rails for $72,439.44.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. The cost is expected to be a part of the
anticipated grant from MDOT.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase of the rail and authorize staff to issue a
purchase order to buy the rails.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Schweifler to approve the
minutes.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Spataro, Warmington, Buie
Nays: None
Absent: Commissioner Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
2002-72 NEW BUSINESS:
a. TEDF Category F-Grant Applications. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Your permission to submit TEDF Category F Grant application for
the Milling & Resurfacing of Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln to Beach Street. Estimated cost is
$300,000.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: A 20% match plus engineering cost which are estimated at $100,000 if
the project is approved.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. However, should the project get approval,
we would have to include it in the 2003 Capital Improvement Budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the submittal of the grant application.
Motion by Vice Mayor Buie, second by Commissioner Larson to approve the submittal
of the TEDF Category F Grant application for the Milling & Resurfacing of Sherman Blvd.,
from Lincoln to Beach Street.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Larson, Schweifler, Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron
Nays: None
Absent: Commissioner Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
b. Black Creek Road Project. ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Direction as to whether or not a special assessment should be
created to mill and resurface Black Creek Rd., between Sherman & Latimer. As
instructed, the engineering department mailed letters to all business owners abutting
Black Creek Rd., between Sherman & Latimer to gauge their interest in paving the
aforementioned section of Black Creek Rd. in the light of the recent commission action to
limit the assessable amount to 45% of the total cost of improvements.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to proceed with preparation for a public
hearing to create a special assessment district.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Motion by Commissioner Larson , second by Vice Mayor Buie to authorize staff to not
proceed with preparation for a public hearing to create a special assessment district.
MOTION WITHDRAWN BY COMMISSIONER LARSON
Motion by Commissioner Schweifler, second by Commissioner Gawron to authorize
staff to proceed with preparation for a public hearing to create a special assessment
district for Black Creek Rd., between Sherman & Latimer.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
c. Request for Proposals for Buildable Large Vacant Parcel at the
Northeast corner of Marquette and Getty. PLANNING & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the advertising of a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a
large parcel of land on the Northeast corner of Marquette and Getty described as Lot
655 and 658 and the south 60' of Lot 659 (As measured at right angles to the south line of
Lot 659) Muskegon Urban Renewal Plat No. 4, as recorded on Uber 19, Pages 19-22,
Muskegon County Records.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The sale of this large parcel for a housing development will generate
additional tax revenue for the City and will place the property back on the City's tax rolls
thus relieving the City of continued maintenance cost.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the resolution and to authorize both the Mayor
and the Clerk to sign said resolution.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Land Reutilization Committee (LRC) recommended
advertising of a Request for Proposals for this large parcel of land at their May 28, 2002
meeting.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Vice Mayor Buie to refer this item for
further review at the next Worksession Meeting.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
d. Extenstion of time - Fisherman's Landing Relocation. CITY MANAGER
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To authorize an additional 90 days for staff to negotiate a
development agreement with Great Lakes Dock & Materials to relocate Fisherman's
Landing. The original 90 days has expired and while significant progress has been made
on this project, additional time is necessary to complete this transaction.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the request.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None
Motion by Commissioner Larson, second by Commissioner Gawron to authorize an
additional 90 days for staff to negotiate a development agreement with Great Lakes Dock
& Materials to relocate Fisherman's Landing.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Spataro
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
e. Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order to
demolish for the following:
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur with the
findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the following structures are unsafe,
substandard, a public nuisance and that they be demolished within thirty (30) days. It is
further requested that administration be directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the
structures and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute
contracts for demolition with lowest responsible bidders.
1) 19 6 1 Leahy
Case # & Project Address: #00-63 1916 Leahy, Muskegon, Ml
Location and ownership: This structure is a church (Revival Temple) located on Leahy in
the Marsh Neighborhood between E. Holbrook and Keating Avenue.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 7/11/00, a
notice and order to repair was issued 8/18/00. The case was brought before the HBA in
January 2002. The case was tabled for 30 days because Rev. Duncan called the
Inspection Department and spoke with Bob Grabinski, stating that repairs were finished
and he would call for a final inspection. A final inspection was scheduled, but the Rev.
failed to appear for it. The building inspector said reparis are started, but not finished.
The case was brought before the HBA again in March 2002 and no one from the church
appeared. The case was declared substandard, a public nuisance, and dangerous
building on that date. There has been no contact from the church since scheduling the
inspection.
Owner Contact: There has been no contact since the Jan. 2002 HBA meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Fund
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED None
State equalized value: N/ A - church
Estimated cost to repair: $3,000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
REQUESTED BY STAFF TO HAVE ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA
2) 2082 Estes
Case # & Project Address: #00-57 2082 Estes.
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Estes in the Lakeside Neighborhood.
It is owned by David Vankammen, who lives next door.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 7/20/00. A
notice and order to repair was issued 8/1 /00. The case was brought before the HBA in on
10/5/00, 5/3/01, 12/6/01 and 5/2/02. Mr. VanKammen has repeatedly stated repairs will
be completed, but they have not. There have been many complaints from neighbors in
regard to this property being a disgrace to the neighborhood.
Owner Contact: Mr. VanKammen has been in contact with Bob Grabinski and has
promised to complete repairs, but does not follow through.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Fund
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED None
State equalized value: $31,200
Estimated cost to repair: $8,000 plus cost of interior renovation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Schweifler to concur with
the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Spataro, Warmington
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
3) 318 E. Apple
Case# & Project Address: #01-049, 318 Apple
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Apple Ave., between Fork and
Emerald in the Angell Neighborhood. It is owned by George Dobben.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 11/8/01. A
notice and order to repair was issued 11 /19 /01. A notice of hearing before the Housing
Board of Appeals was issued 12/21 /01. An order to demolish was issued 2/11 /02.
Owner Contact: Bruce Austin was present at the HBA meeting l /3/02 to represent Mr.
Dobben. He had been hired to work on the building. There has been no contact since
that date.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: CDBG Fund
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED None
State equalized value: $190,800
Estimated cost to repair: $25,000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Vice Mayor Buie to concur with the
Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Spataro, Warmington, Buie
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
4) 1836 Nevada
Case # & Project Address: #02-06 1836 Nevada, Muskegon Ml
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Navada between Laketon and
Windsor. It is owned by MLA Inc.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 3/15/02 and
a notice and order to repair was issued 3/25/02. On 5/2/02 the HBA declared the
structure a public nuisance, substandard, and dangerous building. An interior inspection
was scheduled by a realtor for 5/8/02 and their contact person did not appear for the
inspection.
Owner Contact: The realtor's office has been in contact and scheduled the interior
inspection. They called again and were not aware their maintenance man had not
appeared for the inspection.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: General Fund
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED None
State equalized value: $12,900
Estimated cost to repair: $15,000 plus cost of interior rehabilitation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
Motion by Commissioner Gawron, second by Commissioner Larson to concur with the
Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Larson, Schweifler, Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
5) 1458 Sixth
Case # & Project Address: #01-053, 1458 Sixth St.
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Sixth Street between Grand and
Washington. It is owned by Daniel Herrema of Grandville.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 12/12/01. A
notice and order to repair was issued 12/18/01. HBA on 02/07 /02 found the structure to
be dangerous and unsafe ..
Owner Contact: The owner talked to Bob Grabinski on 3/6/02 and was given a 60/day
extension to complete repairs. No permits have been pulled and there has been no
contact with the owner since then.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: CDBG
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED None
State equalized value: $17,200
Estimated cost to repair: $25,000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Schweifler to concur with
the Housing Board of Appeals decision to demolish, with the condition that if the Building
Inspector, upon inspection of building, finds it up to code then the demolition will not
proceed.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Schweifler, Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
6) 1715 Superior.
Case# & Project Address: #02-01, 1715 Superior.
Location and ownership: This structure is located in the Marsh Neighborhood and is
owned by Amy Bradley of Fruitport, Ml.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on 6/23/98.
Some work was done without permits after that time. Another inspection was conducted
1/22/02 after a fire. A Notice and Order to Repair was issued on 1/30/02. No one was
present to represent the case before the HBA on 3/7 /02 and the structure was declared
substandard and dangerous. The owner called the Inspection Dept. after that date and
scheduled an interior inspection, which was conducted 3/25/02. On 4/29/02 the owner
called the office and inquired on what to do next. She was informed she needed to
submit a schedule of repairs and apply for permits. There has been no contact since that
date. The city has had the structure boarded on 3 separate occassions.
Owner Contact: Owner has not been in contact with this office since 7/20/01. At the HBA
meeting in September, he was told he could stop this from going before the City
Commission by scheduling an interior inspection and supplying this office with a time line
for repairs.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: CDBG
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED None
State equalized value: $14,000
Estimated cost to repair: $20,000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
REQUESTED BY STAFF TO HAVE ITEM BE REMOVED FROM AGENDA.
f. MOU Agreement with MDOT for the Construction of Shoreline Drive East.
ENGINEERING
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Enter into agreements with the Michigan Department of
Transportation to provide funding for the proposed Shoreline Dr. East Project.
Furthermore, due to the timing constrains, it is requested that your approval, if granted,
be contingent upon compliance with the City Attorney's review. Also, it is respectfully
requested that the Mayor & City Clerk be authorize to execute said agreements and the
necessary resolution.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of the project, including the existing section of
Shoreline Dr., from Terrace to Southern Ave. is $11,850,000 of which the City is responsible
for an estimated total of $650,000.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None at this time. The City's share would come out of Major
Street Fund ($500,000). Sewer Fund ($75,000) and Water Fund ($75,000).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditional approval of the agreements and resolution.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Motion by Commissioner Larson, second by Vice Mayor Buie to enter into agreements
with MDOT to provide funding for the proposed Shoreline Dr. East Project, and have the
Mayor and City Clerk authorized to execute agreements and necessary resolution.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
g. Traffic Signal Support Pole Painting. CITY MANAGER
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the painting of 32 traffic signal support poles in the
downtown area utilizing Consumers Energy's contract with Pennington Bros. (Twin Lake,
Ml.) These poles are in need of painting and doing so will accomplish another
component of the Blight Fight effort.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: 32 poles@ $354.00 each $11,328.00
40 brackets @ $40.00 Each 1,600.00
TOTAL $12,928.00
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the request
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Schweifler to approve the
painting of 32 traffic signal support poles in the downtown area utilizing Consumers
Energy's contract with Pennington Brothers, Twin Lake, ML
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
h. Employment Agreement between the City of Muskegon and Bryon L.
Mazade. City Manager.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To approve the employment agreement between the City of
Muskegon and Bryon L. Mazade, City Manager, effective July 1, 2002.
Motion by Commissioner Schweifler, second by Commissioner Gawron to approve the
employment agreement between the City of Muskegon and Bryon L. Mazade, City
Manager, effective July 1, 2002.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Warmington, Buie, Gawron, Larson, Schweifler, Spataro
Nays: None
Absent: Shepherd
MOTION PASSED
ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Commission Meeting for the City of Muskegon was
adjourned at 7:04pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Gail Kundinger, CMC/ AAE
City Clerk
Date: June 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Gail A. Kundinger, City Clerk
RE: Fireworks Display - Nickelback Concert
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rachel Kane is requesting approval of a
fireworks display for the July 2, 2002, 'Nickelback' concert at the
Muskegon Summer Celebration. Fire Marshall Metcalf has reviewed the
request and recommends approval contingent on inspection of the
fireworks. Risk Management has approved the insurance.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval contingent on inspection of the
fireworks.
2002-71(b)
PERMIT
FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY
Act 358, P.A. 1968
This permit is not transferable. Possession of this permit by the herein named person will
autho~ him to possess, transport and display fireworks in the amounts, for the purpose, and
at the place listed below only.
TYPE OF DISPLAY: {Ol PUBLIC DISPLAY ( ) AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTROL
ISSUED TO: Rachel Kane - Nickelback Concert
NAME Mark Castle
ADDRESS 24932 Avenue Kearny, #1 AGE 30
Valencia, CA 91355
REPRESENTING
NAlvlE OF ORGANIZATION, GROUP, FIRM OR CORPORATION
Muskegon Summer Celebration
ADDRESS
NUMBER & TYPES OF FIREWORKS:
DISPLAY:
Heritage Park Landing
EXACT LOCATION
Muskegon, MI 49440 July 2, 2002 9p.m. - 11p.m.
CITY, VILLAGE, TOWNSHIP DATE TIME.
-
BOND OR !NSURANCE FILED: ~cl: YES ( ) NO AMOUNT $ 1, 000, 000.
rssOED BY
Issued by action of the Ml /SK EGON CITY COMMISSION
(=cil, eommiuion, board)_
of the CITY of MUSKEGON
(eity. vdllOJe. cownship) (name of ci~. village. rDWNhip)
(!1!91Uute .t. position of eoun.:il. eommi:uion or boud reprcscnutivc)
Stage & Effects Engineering, Inc.
Subject: Proposed effects Plan, Nickelback Concer1, 7!02! 2002; Muskegon Summer Celebration
To whom it May Concern:
I have been referred to your office in regards to the proposed effects plan for
the 'Nickelback' concert. I would like to submit for your review our intended effects
plan, and to request your approval and advisement on ensuring we meet the
requirements of all authorities having jurisdiction.
The proposed effects include both pyrotechnic and flame effect
elements. We have not finalized the pyrotechnic effects list for this
venue, as it will be contingent on meeting the approval and parameters
of all parties invested.
The proposed pyrotechnic effects may include:
5 Mortar Hits 1 T3
9 Helicopter Bullet Hits
3 Stage Mines, 15 1 , Red
3 Stage Mines, 15' 1 White
3 Stage Mines, 15', Blue
5 Silver Flash Trays, 6"
45 Waterfalls, 15s x 25'
13 Airbursts, Sm., Popcorn
3 Airbursts, Sm. , Red
3 Airbursts, Sm., Blue
10 A/B Concussions
5 Flame Projectors, #200, Blue
In Venues that do not support propane flame effects, we may use;
24 Flame Projectors, #200, orange
In venues not allowing A/B concussions, we may use;
10 SB-20
Thus far, we are considering the use of two (2) accumulators,
which each support four (4) flame effects, for a total of eight (8)
positions for flame. The height and duration of the effect is
controlled by the operator, and is predetermined according to the
parameters of the venue, the cue, and the Authorities Having
Jurisdiction.
Please find included the effects data package for your review.
Please let me know if you would like a copy of our equipment
registration, and by what means would be most convenient.
Please advise of any additional information or documentation you
will require to approve of this plan, as well as any parties required
to be named as additionally insured. Ple·ase' also advise as to any
specific restrictions or concer~s regarding the use of propane.
If you have any que_st_ions or concerns, please feel free to
contact me any time_. _
Best regards,
Rachel Kane
Tour Coordinator
Stage & Effects Engineering
rkane@jemfx.com
24932 Avenue Kearny Suite 1 Valencia, CA 91355
Office 661-702-1367 Fax 661-702-1368
231 724 ' 4178 P. 0 ·2
MAY-21 -200 2 12: 28 PM CITY.CLERKSsOFFICE
FM- 32( 12-8B1
APPLICATION
FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT
Ac:t 358, P.A. 1968 1; A i \ ~ ;i/4zN
.
1. TYPE OF DISPLAY: G1" Public Display
• Agriculturol Pest Control
2, APPLICANT
,!; AOORESS AGE: Must be 21 or over
.5'v/] ~ 1_
NAME OF PERS.f)N/
2~~/..L ILA 1- Zt/43:2. ,1//" A-A/'it11,
,
-::;;
IF A :7
✓PORATION: Name of President AOORESS
;:;-//: 'ZL,,.n V 1/<-(u,..c,1A/ CA 1 tJ//s5S-
3. PYROTECHNIC OP&RATOR
NAMfti I t'as/~'-
/ll-1,,-
AO DRESS
L/llu r /;, 7~o..tJvJ/.M
/4 ,z
~l"r1 -pS • I',,,,;- • 10
~AOE: Must be 21 or over
~0
I
EXf'fRlfNCE:
NUM8ER-f YEARS NUM8ER OF DISPLAYS
":i"O +
WHERE
~'-'-- /"l,:jv,.,../vt..L- '
vi---
..c/'p(,:4 tocL
NAP.IE$ OF ASSISTANTS:
NAME h
5, t-pLt-A- J t~t-,:,'-...
ADDRESS
1-/'l? I f't"vtri?,. 7✓:1~ URANC,E- COMPANY: NAME AODRESS '
i,,
I
l N ,.. t!,t,._ i A.. 1 tJ//\. a:J (A- OES NO , AMEND, El(TEND OR
~ura BLvd., Bte,140Q ALTERTHECOVEl'.ARFAFFORni;.oav, H!PO[lCIESBELOW.
91436•!007 ·
8-377-380D !i'ax:81S-37"1-J89g INSURERSAFFORDINi: OVERAGE
''-'----------1-,-••-u-.-.--A,-,_-..
. --<>n-~CT't~'tL:;~x~-;~;~,,+-,,-..---c,,-.--------I
INS1,1KER 6!
INSURt;;RC~
INSI.IRE~D:
INSURER ill
0
011' INSUAANC&LISYEO enow HAVB !!!EN V3:iUEOlQ TP:C: INSLfflEO l'lAMf:C p,~OVI? FOR lHE FQl,,lclY l"l!RIOD IH01c.r.Tm. NOTWITM , NDltJ(il
~NT, TERM oa CONDITION QF ANV OONTR.6.CT CiR on,~ JOCUMENT\NJTW: ~P-CTTQ \Vl'IIC:1-1 Tl-l.1$ C~T~ICAre MAYBE ISSUED 0
Tl11! INBURANCli A'l'FO!t.OEO 8V THE F01-1C1!!S OESCRIBE.O ti!l'A!l')CLAlr.15. "
POLICY NUMBER ~---+---------1 LIM\f$
C1-CL04010520 02/09/0~
'
I
O'fHER THAN! •
AUT0¢ti!L.YI ·,
EACKoaou 1mce
•4
$ 000 ,000
C1CL04010S30 0.2/09/02 J.2/31/02 ~GMiGfl~· '4. 000 ,001?,__,
'
JIONel~OC'ATiQN~NEH\CU!$11!,W!,,\!elON$ AO~r.o9'( IHDOIWiMCNT/SPC l~L P \llS'!ON!l
cttd,i$he"'1
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE APRIL 12, 2002
H-1542, HOUSTON AVE from 1st St to 3rd St
STREET & WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
DESCRIPTION
-------------'-----'------ QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
--------t------'=~+-----'=-'----t--="---'-'-"=+--'--'==:_:_---1
ABANDON WATER SERVICE 1 EACH $250.00 $250.00
___ 2;;-_,A_~D:,J::':U::':ST:':MA':'::'N:'H::-'O:=L=cE--=C'--'AS--=T=IN':'G=:----c----:::--::-:-::--------t--:-=6:--=----t-=cEACCC:::-'H--t--"$4-'-0:CO:'-.oc:o+--$:"2?,::-40:::0::_,0:::0:___
-- 3 ____ AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 2_'2A,,_8~"--=C--=·'-~P------'------+-----'1--=5-:-12=-+-----;:S,:-Y':;D';-;--t---=::-$5:C:.:coo::--+_--"$'c7' ::5:;-60:c:·::-o"---o
4 BEN_D_s. 8", 45__D_EGREE, _DLM,J_ _ -------- . _ ------4__ _ EACH ___$"'2"0'::0:':.0c:0+_ _$"'8"0c:0:':.o"o'--l
5 BIT APPROACH 1 TON $100.00 $100.00
- - - - - - - - - - - -----t-----'---l-·--'---'"--'----j--"==c+--===-i
6 . _BIT_ LEVELING MIX 3C@ 220#/SY.-CD-----'------- --+-!-~"----+-T=-O=N-+-----'$4'--'-'-5--=.o--=o+-----'$C::8'-C,1--=o--=o:.:,Oc::0--1
180
7 BIT TO_P MIX4C@ 16511/1,YD ______ ___ ···- -····· 135 - - - TON _ $55.00 $7,425.00
8 CATCH BASIN CASTING EA_ST JORDA_N_#_~45_0R EQ_lJ_AL 4 EACH___ ____ $'-'5--=0--=0_:_.0:.:0+---'$"'2~,o--=o--=o-'-'.O"O'--l
.. __9 __ CATCH BASIN SPECIAL DETAIL 4 EACH $1,300.00 $5,200.00
1_Q___G_ONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DETAIL F-4 MODIFIED 950 LIN. FT. $9.00 $8,550.00
1_1 __ :c:oNCRETE DRIVE APPROACH, 6", STD. 207
_ ---- -- --==-+--=Sc:YC::D:--+--$"'3:"0:'-.o::Co+ __$:::6,,,2:::1,.:0:c.O:::O'-I
12__ CONCRETE__SID_EWALK,>f'_ _ 550 SFT _$=c2c--.:c75;:--t------c-$--'1,':=5c:c12=-.=-50c--,
. 13_,CONCRETESIDEWALK,6" 390 --- SFY- -- $3.25 $1,267.50
14 'CORPORATION STOP 1" MUELLER #15000 OR EQUAL 8 EACH $300.00 $2,400.00
15 :CURB STOP I" & BOX MUELLER #15150 OR EQUAL 7 EACH $300.00 $2,100.00
---+-----,
16 :MACHINE GRADING STA. 4.9
- ~$500.00
··------------·---..- - - - - - - - --·--- ----------, - - --t- - - 1 - - -$2,450.00 ~~--
- __1_7___ JMANHOLE CASTING EAST JORDAN #1000 OR EQUAL 3 EACH $500.00 $1,500.00
_j8 __ ,PAVT MRKG, OVERLAY COLD PLASTIC, 6", CROSS WALK 150 LFT $1.50 $225.00
19 jPAVT MRKG, OVERLAY COLD PLASTIC, 18'', STOP BAR 26 LFT $2.00 $52.00
20-/PAVT_MRKG WATERBOF!t,i_E._4'',YEL~o;v___ -: _ _ 125 LFT $1.00 $125.00
21 'RECONSTRUCTING MANHOLE 2 VFT $300.00 $600.00
22 'REDUCER 8" X 6" D.I. M.J. ----------,--1---,- EACH $200.00 $200.00
23 :REMOVING CATCH BASIN
-=-7~-i·····- EA_CH_________ $,--=50--=0-'-.occo-t-----=$3~·=-50c-:0~.0--=0-1
• 24 !REMOVING CONC. SIDEWALK
25 'REMOVING DRIVE APPROACH
750 ___ , __S_F_T_-t--_-t$_1_.o_o__,__ ~-$--=7=-50=-.0=-0C7
135 SYD $8.00 $1,080.00
------·-
26 !REMOVING PAVEMENT (INCLUDING CURB) 1760 SYD $9.00 $15,840.00
27__ _iREMOVING TREES, 25" TO 36" .. ______ -·· 1 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.00
28 _SLEE_VES_LCl_NG,8", D.I. M.J. ___:2=-------f-EACH _$--=3_0_0._00-+----=$6_0_0_.o-to
29 :.STQRM SEWER,_12'\_<;:7_6._C:::LA=-=S-=S__.V_ _ _ _ __ ---+-1Q~----- ·- LFT $30.00 $3,240.00
30 TERRACE GRADING
___ -----'45"'a'---+--LFT -f-------'$"'8"'.o--=o+-_$""3"',6:.:6--=4:.:.o--=--10
31 TRAFFIC CONTROL . __1____ ·-· LUMP __ $3,QO.-'O"-',O--=O-t-----=$--=3,:.:0--=00:.:.0--=0'--I
32 WATERMAIN,8'.',D.I.CLASS 52 ___ /·····-·2··-7_0.... , LFT _ $30.00 $8,100._()Q__
33 LWATEI, METER PIT, COMPLETE ____________ ------·-- _ _:_1_-+-----'E--=A-'-C'--'H-'---+--$'-'5'--'5--=0'--',0--=0-t--_~$--=5--=5--=0_:_.0:.:0
___ 34 __,WATER SERVICE, 1", TYPE "K" COPPER 260 LFT $16.00 $4,160.007
35 _ WATER_\/AL_V§_BClXIINDC:ClVER, COMPLETE __ ______ _ _____.4 ________ ··- EA__C--=H-----'--+-----=$3_0--=0--=.0_0-+-__$~1~,2_0_0_.0_0--,
SUBTOTAL
-- ------
-·------ -- -- --+"· -- - - -----,--,J-,--- .... -
$106,261.00
_ . _________1_
5'¾~o_E_N_G__I_N_E_E_R_IN_G-+-_ --- _____ _ ------ --· ·- -----t--$~1_5~,9_39_._15__,
TOTAL $122,200.15
Date: June 111, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
From: City Clerk Gail Kundinger
RE: Economic Development Revolving Fund Program
Policies and Guidelines
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt the amended policy for the
Economic Development Revolving Fund Program.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:. To adopt the policy.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Community Relations
Committee recommended adoption of the policy at their June 3, 2002
meeting.
2002-71 (ct)
CITY OF MUSKEGON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND
PROGRAM POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
PURPOSE
The purpose of the City of Muskegon Revolving Loan Fund is to promote economic
development in the City of Muskegon through the provision of capital for new and
expanding locally-sited businesses, with a special emphasis on minority and female
entrepreneurship. The Revolving Loan Fund is intended to supplement but in no way
replace conventional financing sources.
POLICY
Financing will be made available for sound business purposes where there is a
reasonable expectation of repayment, but where conventional lenders are unwilling or
unable either to accept the total risk or to make financing available under terms and
conditions which the applicant can afford. Priority under the program will be assigned to
ventures with conventional participation and minimal use of public funds either for the
project itself or for supporting public improvements. Principal and interest repayments
on loans from the Fund will revert to the Fund for support of similar activities.
In extraordinary circumstances, the Fund may be used to finance public improvements
necessary to support private developments, where those impr-ovements are critical to the
success of the project, and where the overall development will result in creation of
permanent, full-time jobs. The Fund, however, is intended to be permanent and self-
sustaining, and no disbursements should be made without the expectation of full and
timely repayment.
I. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Loans from the Revolving Loan Fund can be used to finance acquisition and
development, including land acquisitions as well as rehabilitation, modernization,
and conversion of existing facilities and purchase of machinery and equipment.
Working capital loans will only. be made if essentiai to the creation or retention of
jobs. Project must conforrn;,ie·focal zoning and/or building codes .
.,,,.. '
Loans may be used to finance industrial, commerc:ial and multi-family residential
development which is conformance with the properties and restrictions
established for this program.
1
A. Industrial Development
1. Job Creation or Retention - It shall be a goal to establish or
retain one permanent job for Muskegon residents for each
$15,000 in financing provided by the Fund. Projects involving
the hiring of City residents or long-term unemployed will be
more favorably consider-ed.
2. Project Location - Preference will be given to industrial
projects which promote sound land use planning in one or
more of the following ways: (i) location of a new industry in an
industrial park; (ii) relocation of an industry to achieve
conformance with an official land use plan; (iii) reuse,
renovation, or modernization of facilities currently located in
areas appropriately zoned.
3. Type of Industry - Priority will be assigned to growth industries
with little or no negative impact on the environment.
B. Commercial Development
1. Job Creation or Retention - It shall be a goal to establish or
retain one permanent job for Muskegon residents for each
$15,000 in financing provided by the Fund. Projects involving
the hiring of City residents or long-term unemployed will be for
favorably considered.
2. Project Location - Preference will be given to financing for
commercial development projects to be located either in the
downtown, or on the lakefront and in conformance with official
land use plans. Also, preference will be given to projects
involving · the renovation or preservation of historic or
architecturally significant structures.
3. Type of Business - Priority will be assigned to commercial
development which contributes to a diversification of the area
economy, with little or no negative impact on the environment.
C. Residential Development
-, ",!'.,:~"
Preference ~Ill be given to financing for market rate commercial
housing to ·be located in the downtown. Also preferences will be
given to projects involving the renovation of preservation of
historic or architecturally significant structures.
II. LOAN POLICIES
A. Assistance from the Revolving Fund may be made available in the form of
loans or loan guarantees, under terms established by the City
2
Commission with the advice of the Loan Fund Advisory Committee. All
loans should be secured by assets having a value equal to or exceeding
the loan amount. No loan or loan guarantee shall be extended if funds
are otherwise available from private lenders or other federal agencies on
terms which will permit the accomplishment of the project.
B. It is the City's intent that the RLF loan portfolio be well diversified.
Accordingly no single loan or series of loans to a single recipient will be
allowed which exceeds twenty percent (20%) of the net collectible assets
of the Revolving Loan Fund, with the exception of a significant public
- private partnership project (in which case the amount may exceed
20%).
C. The applicant shall provide at least twenty percent (20%) equity in the
total business or project. It is the intent of this program that loans be
made to supplement (but not replace) private financing where such
private financing alone is insufficient to make otherwise worthwhile
projects feasible. Accordingly, no loan will be made unless private
financing equal to at least fifty percent (50%) of the total project cost has
been secured (or can be confirmed contingent upon RLF loan approval).
No more than thirty percent (30%) of total project costs should be
provided by the Revolving Fund for a new business, or forty percent
(40%) of total assets for expansion of an existing business. "Total
Assets" as used here includes those assets anticipated to be purchased
or constructed with proceeds of the requested loan. Interest rates will
normally be set at one-half of the prime rate (as quoted in the daily Wall
Street Journal) plus two percent (2%). The term of a loan shall not
exceed five (5) years, or three-fourths of the estimated economic life of
the structure, whichever is less. A loan to a tenant .may not extend
beyond the unexpired term of the lease, excluding any options to extend
the term of the lease that have not been exercised prior to loan approval.
D. Applicants will be · required to submit a business plan, financial
statements, including balance sheets, income statements, and supporting
statements, for the applicant's three (3) most recent fiscal years. A credit
check will be conducted on all applicants and may be used in determining
the applicant's credit worthiness. In addition, the City will require
submission of projected pro forma balance sheets and income
statements, cash flow, and supporting statements of the applicant on a
quarterly basis. Appljcants may also be -required to submit additional
information as deterr~ffied by the City or the Advisory Committee.
E. Loan conditions wilfinclude the following, as determined by the City:
1. Fire, hazard, and normal business insurance on all assets for the
term of the loan;
2. Subordination of the applicant's shareholder debt and all debts of
shareholders to the loan;
3. Restrictions on salaries and dividends during the term of the loan;
3
4. Personal guarantees (including spouses and security in other
assets);
5. Such other conditions as the City determines are necessary to
assure the safety and soundness of the loan.
6. Favorable credit check;
7. Adherence to the City of Muskegon's Affirmative Action policies
and goals, including submission of an up-to-date affirmative action
plan; and
8. Current and projected employment profile detailing place of
residence, racial and gender characteristics, and employee
classifications.
F. Loans will be approved only on the condition that the applicant not
relocate facilities or employment outside of the City of Muskegon during
the term of the loan. To the extent possible, loans will be approved only if
it can be demonstrated that the collateral exceeds the loan amount.
G. Principal and interest payments will commence on the date(s) set by the
City. The applicant must submit quarterly financial statements in
conformance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Ill. ADDITIONAL LOANS
The RLF is intended to be a one time financing source for business start-ups and
expansions. Requests for additional financing from the RLF will only be
considered under extraordinary circumstances. Such requests, in addition to
meeting all of the aforementioned loan criteria, will be considered only if (a) at
least fifty percent (50%) of the original loan balance has been repaid; and (b) all
payments required under the original loan repayment schedule were made in a
timely fashion.
IV. LOAN FUND ADMINISTRATION
Prior to making any loan commitment from the Revolving Fund, the City will first
obtain the advice of the Loan Fund Advisory Committee (LFAC), a committee of
five members appointed by~~l! Mayor and Commission approval. Membership
on the committee will be as follows:
A. Two representatives from the City Commission;
B. One representative from area financial institutions;
C. One public sector representative; and
D. The Finance Director or Designee.
4
V. EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTKJcES
A. It is the intent of the City Commission that all loans conform to the policies
and guidelines outlined herein. Accordingly, each loan application
submitted to the City Commission for approval must include a summary
"scoresheet" indicating whether or not the proposed loan adheres to each
of the specific policies and guidelines in this document.
B. Notwithstanding the above, it is recognized that the assets of the
Revolving Loan Fund may be used for projects or purposes not
contemplated here or for loans that do not meet all of the policies and
guidelines outlined. In such cases, approval by a two-thirds majority of
the City Commission will be necessary. Commission approval shall be
required for the use of funds for public improvements, purchase of land or
equipment by the City, or other public purposes.
91-86e
Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund Policy 1
8-27-91
Adopted J une 11, 2002 .
Gail A. Kundi nger
eity Clerk
:, ~!}:~,-.
~.
5
Date: June 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
From: City Clerk Gail Kundinger
RE: An Ordinance to Adopt the Michigan Vehicle Code
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To adopt the Michigan Vehicle Code by
reference.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.
BUDGET A~TION REQUIRED: None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To adopt the ordinance.
Date: June 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Light Fixture & Exit Signs Replacement in the
basement @ City Hall
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Authorization to enter into a $16,970 contract with Belasco Electric, out of Muskegon, to
replace a total of 177 outdated fixtures in the basement of City hall with a TB lamps &
electronic ballast in accordance with the recommendation outlined in the energy analysis ~
report prepared by Tower Pinkster Titus Associates earlier this year. According to the
report, the fixture replacement will have a 5. 72-years payback and an expected life of 25-
years.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The cost of $16,970.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None at this time. The cost will come out of the City Hall budget and any necessary
revision, if one becomes necessary, will be reflected on a future quarterly update.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve a contract with Belasco.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Muskegon agreed to participate in the State of Michigan's School and Local
Government Energy Initiative program. An Introductory Energy Evaluation report was
performed for the City Hall and eight other buildings, the report for which was published in
January of 2001. In August of 2001, the City contracted with Tower Pinkster Titus Associates,
Inc. to serve as the energy analyst to prepare the Technical Energy Analysis report which
follows.
The building is approximately 30 years old and houses the City of Muskegon's municipal offices
and police department. Its two floors and basement comprise an overall occupied area of
approximately 60,000 square feet. The building envelope is primarily concrete masonry unit
construction with double glazed windows and a low overall glass to wall ratio .
Natural gas and electricity are the two energy commodities which are used for supporting the
building's internal functions and maintaining occupant thermal comfort. For the study period
which covered the twelve consecutive utility billing months ending with June of 2001, energy
consumption statistics were as follows:
Commodity Annual Usage Annual Cost EUI*
Natural Gas 70,168 ccf $33,324 120,455
Electricity 1,112,056 $64,102 63,239
Total $97,426 183,694
* Energy Utilization Index in BTU's per square foot
,The energy analysis was performed using Elite Software's EZDOE program which is a "front
·end" for Berkley Laboratories' DOE 2.1. This tool was used to build a theoretical model of the
building which emulated its energy performance. A base model having reasonable correlation
with actual energy consumption data was subsequently manipulated to emulate the various
energy conservation recommendations so as to define their individual and collective impact on
future energy use.
Most of the recommendations defined in the report are related to the building's HVAC and
lighting systems. A single recommendation is also proposed for the domestic water heating
system. The envelope components were found to be performing satisfactorily and no
recommendations are made. The entire program, which is recommended for full
imp 1ementahon, 1s summanze. d mt
. he fio11owmg tabl e:
-- -- --
ECM Description Cost Savings Payback Useful
& Page ($) ($) (years) Life
DH-1/11 DDC control ooint for domestic hot water circulator 500 183 2.73 10
HC-1/12 New hot water boiler/summer shutdown of steam olant / 42,600 3,001 14.20 20
HC-2/13 Occupancy-based outdoor air ventilation manal!ement 17,520 6,000 2.92 15
HC-3/14 Separate occupied/unoccupied control for reheat zones 9,570 1,488 6.43 15
·· L-1/15 Storage room occupancy sensors 1,136 1,165 0.98 10
852 270 3.16 10
L-2/16 Toilet/Janitor Closet/Conference Room occuoancy sensors
3,023 5.72 25
I
17,302
-r-;? ~ L-3/17 Light fixture and EXIT sign replacement ~
PROGRAM TOTALS
2
89,480 15,130 5.91
-
I
-- - --
f
To: Mohammed Al-Shatel
From: JR Gann
Date: 4-8-02
This is to recommend Belasco Electric of Muskegon to replace our lighting fixtures in the
basement of City Hall and Police dept. The energy audit advised us the cost would be
$17,302. And the low bid is from Belasco for the price of $16,970. We will replace the
existing fixtures with electronic ballasts and T-8 tubes.
JR Gann
Bldg. Maint. Supvr.
City of Muskegon
,
CITY OF MUS~EGON
TELEPHONE BID. ,.. .TABULATION
Date Z. - / 9. . 0 ---- Requisition ________________
Name of Bidder· Harne of Bidder. Name of Bidder
Vendor (J 1h vJ.-. F /,._ r...,T .. w;'{-T~ ;;;..... c.,f. J?e.,)o. Seo r='(~<.,-J-.
Telep~one
Num er 17'?, - 00l 1 7 2-2.- :-? C/ 9)
'
Quoted
By 6).oQe/ 1? 1' / f I( &\\N\ 1.1 e,"' ~ Cl •
'' P,'ck
I. Unit
.., · Ur.it V \I Unit ..
Quantity Description Price Total Price '.Price .. Total Price Price Total Price
R,_ e., f I ;,. c,.__ 'ii di- -f'/1-"ti,,, it 5 . J: i,, &, v.._ L. ..... 11..... ii
. . ' ~ ._ t,
--=--
'" J,,,,,,.q_""'.__'--"---r I I,, I' t,,.,, ] ----j > WI '-5 ;t, 1:9/, /(_;, ?70,
. ,
l,j I }--1, 1· 122-3991
QUOTATION
ELECTRIC ~~ FAX 722-1814
Co., Inc. ~ 1391 Peck st.
Muskegon, Ml 49441
COMPLETE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING
'7 -
r c:.:. l.,."'i o F /YI u.s~~"'
7 DATE O cSI, - / 0 ;)_
Cl'3'3 ~ c £ . . PAGE { OF (
rt1-"- fi~ 6,. ow, m::c li-"1' 9-Q
REFERENCE t.. , b f./-r, N G (.,,(,P &'1-ADE=-
i..!'TTENTION: ~..R_ ('f;,4,vl\l .J ro /2... C- I T 'I ,-Mt,{..,
WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING OUOTATION FOR YOUFI CONSIDERATION:
IXIANTl1Y l)UCRIPTION UNI.PRICE
1) P/J.t c.£ AS ():EQu.J=.~T#<:, -ro !/I !{,I q70,oo
~Mc.£. ,t... I(,,, tl-T FI /(TI:.,( ,'I£ s {0
'
r& EE. ,ttJel2- G, .,. S ,+c.J I fV (;:,, s-ryL£'.
~ l~ "(<.,t(U!;. Q...,. ANT ITY AN I':> S7fJ.E- AS
f' 0 J,,,1,-0 W S: Description Quantity '
2L-20T12 vs. 2L-t7T8 14
2L-40T1.2 VlS, 2L-32T8 120
4L-40T12 vs. 4L-32T8 27
2l•24U vs, 2l•17T8 4
2L-96T 12 vs• .(L•96T8 5
2L-96HO vs.2L•l:IIIT8HO 4
1l.-40T12vs. L-3218 1
Exit Inc. vs. t;Xit LED 2
ffctc£ :kuCJ.. p f!/2,,,., IT!:.
AN'-/ aIIPMEIIT IN SQ
DAI'$ OH~Y, UNLESS SUCH 'Ill" 19 U1'£HD£11 IN WAITIHC,
GUANTITl&I SMOWN ABOVE ARE NOr QUARANTEE.11.
03/11/2002 14:59 FAX 2317731897 WIRTZELECTRICINC la) 01
'.
ELECTRJC & COMMUNICATIONS
1675 s. 5""'1dan • t.fusi oattyflf6. tomadn, .anddhcz"DGa21WJ ~upm.boV.t;wotk,. Worlunan's
Compmo1im .,_d :Public Linbilily ~ on 21bovi!!Wor\. '6 betatm out by WlltZEl.mricad Camn.ui~r;,
TIIISPROPOSALM.WBE WITHDRAWN BYUSIFNOT ACCllPtt!J WlTIIINJ0 DAYS.
c2,oo o< - 71 {l)
CITY OF MUSKEGON
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES OR CONSTRUCTION
Small and Limited Projects
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT between the CITY OF MUSKEGON ("City"), 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon,
Michigan, and Belasco Electric Co., Inc. ("Contractor''),
of Muskegon , Michigan, for a small or limited project, and is made in the following terms:
Agreement and Performance
Contractor agrees to perform and supply all the services and materials set forth in the Statement of
Work attached to this agreement, ("Performance"). Contractor's performance shall be accomplished
in good and workmanlike manner, to the satisfaction of the City. Performance shall be completed on
or before 7-31-02 .
Contractor will perform as set forth above for the complete contract price of $16,970.00
Conditions and Covenants
Contractor will comply with all laws, rules and regulations of the City, and any other local government
of the State of Michigan and the United States Government. Contractor will supply insurance as
required by separate written document, naming the City as an additional insured, if appropriate, and
shall carry such additional insurance coverage's as are required by the City. Contractor shall hold the
City harmless against any and all claims for damages or costs made against the City arising from
Contractor's performance, including all costs of defense, attorneys' fees, expenses and the amount of
any damage determined against the City.
Contractor certifies that it is eligible for performance of government work and has not been cited or
listed for failure to comply with Wage and Hour or prevailing wage regulations of the State of
Michigan or the Federal Government.
Termination and Cancellation
This contract may be terminated for failure to perform in accordance herewith, and Contractor shall
be liable for normal contractual remedies available to the City. In the event liquidated damages for
nonperformance age agreed to, the following amounts constitute liquidated damages:
$ N/A per day of nonperformance.
Nondiscrimination Compliance
Contractor agrees to comply with all nondiscrimination laws, rules and regulations and policies of the
City, State and Federal Governments including, but not limited to, the provisions of Executive Order
11246, Affirmative Action Requirements for Disabled Veterans and Veterans of the Viet Nam Era and
for Handicapped Workers. If required by the City and appropriate for the services in this contract,
Contractor shall comply with City oversight procedures. The provisions of all said policies, rules,
executive orders and laws regarding nondiscrimination and affirmative action are available from the
City by contacting the Affirmative Action Director of the City, City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon,
Michigan, telephone 724-6703. The City may supply a copy with this contract in its discretion.
The parties agree to performance of this contract by signing below. The effective date of this
agreement is June 17 2002
,t~
~/SJ~
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Contract Between
City of Muskegon
and
Belasco Electric Co. Inc.
STATEMENT OF WORK
See attached scope of services.
Initials:
Contractor: - - - -
City: _ _ _ _ __
(staff member)
.. 02/19/2002. l2:0E; 213772181.il . . ·.· BELASCO ELECTRIC PAC:£ 02 .
BELASCO. es_._·.. (231>m-a991 .. QUOTATION_.-·.
ELECTRIC l.'hi
C:O., Inc. E.··. FAX 722-1814 ·.·
1391 Pack Sf. ·
Muskegon, Ml 49441 · .·
COMPLETE ELECTQICAL CONTAACTIN$ ·
WE 111\E Pl.E;t.SED TO SUBl,MT IBE FQl.LO\'MIG QUOT)ITtOli FQR YOUFI CONSIDEAATION:
IIIIAN'IITY -Ill! Rill 1011 . UNITl'FIICI
ij Pat c...6 AS /l£CJ'-' ,J;r~771f!o ~o
~~ k fr.,. f-1.. -r . Ft Kr'-< ll.l!i$ -ro
re £E..,v£:t'2. Go...,. s ..-..; 1 ""' r,,,,. s rJll.£. .
F l )cru t'U! Q 1.1- A.v "r ITY ANO S 'J'/J.ft..
.,.,.:
AS
•
f /l..( c.£ '3/tJO,;i.A.. ( ~ ! · · A, jd... ~ D i 2 ; ~
~1c:Po!i;A,t_ c:,P- t:,.,_,.,.-c.1n$S:
. . . _- ti'
AAlb
.
f£!12,...1TS_. •. ·.
l 77
U,>.8. ·.·. Tiia.,i:
1,- c"i ~,.,.A,.._ ·
C .
ACORQ. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
PRODUCER (616)454-7153 FAX (616)454-1718
06/19/2002
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
I DATE (MM/OD/VY)
Universal Insurance Services, Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
648 Monroe NW - Suite 300 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURED Belasco Electric, Inc. INSURER A: Hastings Mutual Insurance Co.
1391 Peck St. INSURER B:
Muskegon, MI 49441-2123 INSURER C:
INSURER D:
INSURER E:
'
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TEAM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TEAMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSA
LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER P~}t~~:if68;QrE p2k!fl1~~xm:JlgN LIMITS
~NERAL LIABILITY cPP9369531 05/01/2002 05/01/2003 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 100,000
7 CLAIMS MADE [K] OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000
A ~
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000
.. . GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000
h·LAGG~nE
~
UMIT APnS PER: PRODUCTS· COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000
PRO·
POLICY JECT LOO
1
_ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY LilCV9369525 05/01/2002 05/01/2003 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
$
~
(Ea accident)
ANY AUTO 1,000,000
ALL OWNED AUTOS
- BODILY INJURY
(Per person) $
SCHEDULED AUTOS
A -
-
X HIRED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
$
.X NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident)
'- PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
(Per accident)
RAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY· EA ACCIDENT $
ANY AUTO EAACC $
OTHER THAN
AUTO ONLY: AGG $
00
EXCESS LIABILITY
OCCUR • CLAIMS MADE
LILC9369523 05/01/2002 05/01/2003 EACH OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
$
$
2,000,000
A
R DEDUCTIBLE
RETENTION $
000000
$
$
$ 2,000,000
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
WC9369532 05/01/2002 05/01/2003 ITORY LIMITS I IVER"
A E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000
E.l. DISEASE· EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000
E.l. DISEASE· POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000
OTHER
1..DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSJLOCATIONSNEHICLESJEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS
~ity of Muskegon is added as Additional Insured.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER l l ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY Will ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
City of Muskegon
____lq_ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,
Attn: JR Gann
933 Terrace Street BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
PO Box 536 OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
Muskegon, MI 49443-0536 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Walter Wendell fo'~al- 11,., () f'
ACORD 25-S (7/97) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988
IMPORTANT
If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. A statement
on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may
require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate
holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
DISCLAIMER
Th.<, Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between
the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it
affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon.
ACORD 25-S (7/97)
Date: June 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Shoreline Dr. East Rail Purchase
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Authorize the sole source purchase of 7,542.9 feet of rails necessary to construct the new
railroad as part of the proposed Shoreline Dr. East for a total cost of $72,439.44 in
accordance with the City/CSX agreement which was executed back in 1999. The rails will
be sold to the successful contractor.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The cost of purchasing the rails of $72,439.44.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None at this time. The cost is expected to be a part of the anticipated grant from MOOT.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the purchase of the rail and authorize staff to issue a purchase order to buy the rails.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Date: June 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: TEDF Category F-Grant Applications
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Your permission to submit TEDF Category F Grant application for the Milling &
Resurfacing of Sherman Blvd. from Lincoln to Beach Street. Estimated cost is
$300,000.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
A 20% match plus engineering cost which are estimated at $100,000 if the project is approved .
•
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None at this time. However, should the project get approval, we would have to include it in
the 2003 Capital Improvement Budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the submittal of the grant application.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Resolution No.
2002-72(a)
MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION
RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION TO THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
TRANSPORTATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the Michigan Department of Transportation has made available grant
funding for the roadway project deemed necessary to advance economic
development projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Muskegon desires to continue the improvements of it major
street system; and
WHEREAS, preliminary cost estimates associated with each project have been
identified,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Staff is authorized to submit application
to the Michigan Department of Transportation - Transportation and Economic
Development Corporation in various amounts to be matched with local resources.
/j
Resolved this 11th day of June, 2002.
Ayes: Larson, Schweifler, Spataro, Warmington, Buie, Gawron
Nays: None
Abstentions: Shepherd (absent)
RC/g
CERTIFICATION
2002-72(a)
This resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Commission, held on June
11, 2002. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act
of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
LO.~·
By _ _ _~ - - - -- - ~ ~- - - -- -
Gail A. Kundinger, City 6ferk
Date: June 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: Black Creek Road Project
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Direction as to whether or not a special assessment should be created to mill and
resurface Black Creek Rd. between Sherman & Latimer. As instructed, the engineering
department mailed letters to all business owners abutting Black Creek Rd. between
Sherman & Latimer to gauge their interest in paving the aforementioned section of Black
Creek Rd. in light of the recent commission action to limit the assessable amount to 45%
of the total cost of improvements.
A report on the response from businesses will be provided during the meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize staff to proceed with preparation for a public hearing to create a special assessment
district.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
*L et.c..M'---
,_\.i,,_-<,}-
u..) ~
u,.JJ,f
/ Q'> \/ft Amendment.doc
H-1536 BLACK CREEK, SHERMAN TO LA TIMER
2ND PROPERTY OWNER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TABULATION
Ell: PERCENTAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS -14
FOR OPPOSE
LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET LETTER# ST# ST NAME PARCEL# FEET
TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE 4566.750 ..*..
2451 BLACK CREEK 24-695-000-0056-00 309.33
2350 BLACK CREEK 24-134-400-0006-00 285.00
FRONT FEET OPPOSED 1832.63 40.13% 2300 BLACK CREEK 24-134-400-0003--00 658.30
2325 BLACK CREEK 24-134-400-0002-10 300.00
RESPONDING FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 0.000 0.00% 2534 BLACK CREEK 24-695-000-0055-00 280.00
NOT RESPONDING - FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 2734.120 59.87%
TOTAL FRONT FEET IN FAVOR 2734.120 59.87%
TOTALS 0.00 1832.63
TABULATED AS OF: "##### 04:36 PM
~ .
6/11/02 4:36 PM 2nd TABULATION OF THE RESPONSES TO THE SP. ASS. HEARING ON BLACK CREEKxls
MUNN PROPERTIES PAGE 01/01
06/11/2002 06:02 2319413385
(,_ ~S,( J~ I \-H--1 __ )
RESPONSE CARD
Black Creek Road, Sherman to Latimer
YOUR VOTE COUNTS!
.- . ·- ,. - . -
~__.,. _..
· -· -· - -i'lea:1e vote irteilliei favor of'or opposed to the Special Assess~ent Street Paving Project
I AM IN FAVOR • I AM OPPOSED ~
°""'~~-,.~ co0w.,.,...,..
.l'f~i11d::Js:'!--.,_...,..,._ l / . ~ ~
--~-~~re I .J/'11,tfl:,
Ad""•~
Signatur ~1
1f ; .._,.
THANK YOlJ FORTAKING TIME TO VOTE ON TlllS IMPORTANT ISSUE
MaiJ to: City ofMuskegon933 Terrace St. Muskegon, Ml 49442
OR
Fax To: (231) 727-6904
$~tNO.COMMOlll2001 MASTERFlt.i\nOIECTSlblack cne.lr ..-J.fflS36\Com111inion All\tllHlmwil.doc
PORT CITY GROUP PAGE 01
05/31/2002 14:25 2317777319
RESPONSE CARD
Black Creek Road, Sherman to Latimer
YOUR VOTE COUNTS!
-- . - •- ----·~ -- - -----· --·---
Please vote in either favor of or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project
I AMIN FAVOR • I AM OPPOSED ~
Owner &uce 0- (::5'5G-Y CoOwner/Spouse
------
Address
~ Signature
9.35-o 'T? 1..4<,K ~(?~EK., Address_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Sii:nature~dtV::r f(1 ::::r::> ( t ::f e n:- Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
~ T ~YOU FOR TAKING TIME TO VOTE ON TIDS IMPORTANT ISSUE
(231) 727-6904
10/t0 39\ld dOId31NI lNOd~dO8d\lH 0S8€LLL tEZ t 9S!tt Z00Z/0t/90
RESPONSE CARD
Black Creek Road, Sherman to Latimer
YOUR VOTE COUNTS!
Please vote in either favor of or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project
I AM IN FAVOR
• I AM OPPOSED
CoOwner/Spouse_ _ _ _ _ __
Address
---------- •
__, Signature_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
THANK YOU FORT AKING TIME TO VOTE ON THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE
Mail to: City ofMuskegon933 Terrace St. Muskegon, MI 49442
OR
Fax To: (231) 727-6904
S:\ENOTNEERING\COMMON\2002 MASTER FILE\PROJECTS\black creek road,H 1536\Comminion Amendment.doc
Sent By: WESTSHOAE CONSULTING; 2317733453; Jun-11-02 3:30PM; Page 1 /1
Westshore Consulting
2534 Blacl<.Crcck Ro•rl • Muskegon, Ml 49~44
Ph: (231) 777-3447 • flf: (231) 7rJ-:J45'.!
F.111;til: Wc:s,;shorel (ij>.aol.(<1111
MEMORANDUM
To: Engineering Department, °{.tyy ooff M
~uuskego , Dute: _J_u_n_e_J_.1_,_2_0_0_2_ _
From: Dexutis W. Dunlap, ~EO ( _ . ~ ~ F i l e No. _N_A_ _ _ _ __
Re: Assessment for Work on Black Creek Road
Wcstshorc Consulting believes work proposed on Black Creek Road should be paid for from the LDFA II
fund. It appears this fund has a significant balance, and the use of these dollar$ would seem appropriate.
Ir lhese f'unds are not available, Westshore votes no on a Special Assessment.
,
HEARING DATE JANUARY 22nd,2002 H-1536
Milling & Resurfacing-Black Creek, Sherman N to Latimer
24-134-400-0003-10 PLANNING DEPT C/O CITY OF M ASSESSABLE FEET: 0
933 TERRACE ST COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2330 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49443 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ~I_ _ _$_0_.0_0~I
24-134-400-0006-00 BJE LL C ASSESSABLE FEET: 285
1985 E LAKETON AVE COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2350 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49442-000 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $5,130.001
24-693-000-0036-00 BEKAERT STEEL WIRE CORP ASSESSABLE FEET: 598.45
2121 LATIMER DR COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2121 LATIMER DR MUSKEGON Ml 49442 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $10,772.101
24-694-000-0038-00 RS B PROPERTY LL C ASSESSABLE FEET: 1045.,l,6
2265 BLACK CREEK RD. COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2265 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49444 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $18,820.08 I
24-694-000-0039-00 REID TOOL SUPPLY CO ASSESSABLE FEET: 366
2265 BLACK CREEK RD COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2246 OLTHOFF ST MUSKEGON Ml 49444 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $6,588.oo 1
24-694-000-0053-00 STATE OF MICHIGAN ASSESSABLE FEET: 0
PO BOX 30050 COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2225 OLTHOFF ST LANSING Ml 48909 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: ~'_ _ _$_0_.o_o~'
24-695-000-0055-00 WESTSHORE ENG & SURVEY ASSESSABLE FEET: 280
2534 BLACK CREEK ROAD COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2534 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49442-000 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $5,040.00 1
6/11/02 Page 2 of 3
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
HEARING DATE JANUARY 22nd,2002 H-1536
Milling & Resurfacing-Black Creek. Sherman N to Latimer
24-134-400-0001-00 CONSUMERS ENERGY ASSESSABLE FEET: 142.23
4000 CLAY AVE SW COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2200 BLACK CREEK GRAND RAPIDS Ml 49501-020 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,560.14 I
24-134-400-0002-00 PLANNING DEPT C/O CITY OF M ASSESSABLE FEET: 61.2
933 TERRACE ST COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2285 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49443 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $1,101.60 I
24-134-400-0002-10 SIGN GRAFTERS ASSESSABLE FEET: 300
2325 BLACK CREEK COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2325 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49442-000 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $5,400.00 1
'
24-134-400-0002-20 TRACE ENVIRONMENTAL SER ASSESSABLE FEET: 396.33
2241 BLACK CREEK COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2241 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49442-000 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $7,133.941
24-134-400-0002-30 PLANNING DEPT C/O CITY OF M ASSESSABLE FEET: 124.35
933 TERRACE ST COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2400 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49443 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $2,238.30 1
24-134-400-0003-00 SOUTH SHORE PROPERTIES ASSESSABLE FEET: 658.3
2300 BLACK CREEK COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2300 BLACK CREEK MUSKEGON Ml 49444-000 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $11,849.40 I
6/11/02 Page 1 of 3
HEARING DATE JANUARY 22nd,2002 H-1536
Milling & Resurfacing-Black Creek. Sherman N to Latimer
24-695-000-0056-00 MUNN PROPERTIES LLC ASSESSABLE FEET: 309.33
1489 US31 NORTH COST PER FOOT: $18.00
@ 2541 BLACK CREEK TRAVERSE CITY Ml 49686 ESTIMATED P.O. COST: I $5,567.94 1
SUM OF ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE: 4566.75 SUM OF ESTIMATED P.O. COST: $82,201.50 1
TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE PARCELS 14
PARCEL WITH $0.00 TOTAL ARE EXEMPT
•
6/11/02 Page 3 of 3
Commission Meeting Date: June 11, 2002
Date: May 29, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor & City Commission
From: Planning & Economic Development Department07°
RE: Request for Proposals for Buildable Large Vacant
Parcel at the Northeast corner of Marquette and
Getty
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To approve the advertising of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a large parcel of land on
the Northeast corner of Marquette and Getty described as:
LOT 655 AND 658, AND THE SOUTH 60' OF LOT 659 (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 659) MUSKEGON URGAN RENEWAL PLAT
NO. 4, AS RECORDED ON UBER 19, PAGES 19-22, MUSKEGON COUNTY RECORDS
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The sale of this large parcel for a housing development will generate additional tax revenue
for the City and will place the property back on the City's tax rolls thus relieving the City of
continued maintenance costs.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the attached resolution and to authorize both the Mayor and the Clerk to sign
said resolution.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Land Reutilization Committee (LRC) recommended advertising of a Request for
Proposals for this large parcel of land at their May 28, 2002 meeting.
5/29/02
Resolution No. - - -
MUSKEGON CITY COMMISSION
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADVERTISEMENT OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
(RFP) FOR A BUILDABLE LARGE VACANT PARCEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF MARQUETTE AND GETTY.
WHEREAS, the City-owned the buildable parcel located on the N01theast corner of Marquette
and Getty is a potential development site for residential development; and
WHEREAS, City policy regarding the sale of large blocks of land states that it is the "preference
of the City that these lots be sold as a single parcel to individuals with the means to develop the
land for multiple single-family units or multi-family units ... "; and
WHEREAS, the sale of this parcel would generate additional tax revenue for the City and relieve
the City of further maintenance costs;
WHEREAS, the Land Reutilization Committee recommends to the Muskegon City Commission
adve1tisement of a Request for Proposals for development of this parcel; and
WHEREAS, the Request for Proposals is consistent with City policy regarding the disposition of
large blocks of City-owned land; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that and Request for Proposals be advertised for the
following property:
LOT 655 AND 658, AND THE SOUTH 60' OF LOT 659 (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 659) MUSKEGON URGAN RENEWAL PLAT
NO. 4, AS RECORDED ON LIBER 19, PAGES 19-22, MUSKEGON COUNTY RECORDS
Adopted this _ _ day of June, 2002.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent
By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Stephen J. Wamington, Mayor
Attest: - - - - - - - - - -
Gail Kundinger, Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hearby certify that the foregoing constitutes a true and complete copy of a resolution adopted
by the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, County of Muskegon, Michigan at a regular
meeting held on June 11, 2002.
By:-----------
Gail Kundinger, Clerk
"ti
a
J
':!I
}j[Ifillfr{J ~;;_: :"~- -~~~---~---
• ~1l ___________ r~~:J ~: : :_-_-_- J ..,o'
-11_1--l-r.-_J l=JL/_[_ ~ B__ l
io'
~[l·.-[..rrrr~r!itl=~~]: ~11_1---ll~[-1 ~rJ
~=
£
..,
"ti
a
_-- ______ l 1-
[BT_ __ - - - - -
~,;HiO~OR
~~--~~~-"--'-----~2d
l
(/j
_[IJJl: ,-~\ . OAKHILL DR
- - --
-~ .--1~--11===--~ --1- __
~-- J-1JJ]-n~-=-~.-:=-_-cc_¼~
~I ~- -
_-_1, -- - JI - _[__
~--1~~7 r---1~~-j -_-_--~-- -~ I fitl~~ rril~ ...
*II
gi
.Q:
a
7J
a
l!
--~w~z
m
AGENDA ITEM
CITY COMMISSION MEETING June 11, 2002
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Bryon L. Mazade, City Manager
DATE: June 4, 2002
RE: Fisherman's Landing Relocation
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
To authorize an additional 90 days for staff to negotiate a development agreement with
Great Lakes Dock & Materials to relocate Fisherman's Landing. The original 90 days
has expired and while significant progress has been made on this project, additional time
is necessary to complete this transaction.
FINANCIAL IMP ACT
None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
To approve the request.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
None
designated in the Purchase Agreement between Muskegon Hospitality, Inc. and the
City of Muskegon for the former Lakos property, with conditions. The conditions ere
included in the Amendment Agreement, and include an extension of three years, at
the inclusion of which a new building will be constructed on the site. Conditions
include the requirement that a paved. landscaped p-::rking lot will be constructed on
the site in the interim. If the parking lot is not ccr.structed. in accordance with
requirer.ients of the Engineering and Planning Departments, by May 31, 2002. the
original staff ;ecommendation of January 8, 2002 will be in effect.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGEi ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the Amendment Agreement and
authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign.
Motion by Commissioner Schweifler, second by Commissioner Lcrson to epprove
the written request from Holiday Inn Muskegon Harbor/Muskegon Hosplk;lity l11c. to
extend the construction time period designated in the Purchase Agreement between
Muskegon Hospitality, Inc. and the City of Muskegon for the former Lakos property,
with conditions.
ROLL VOTE: Ayes: Buie, Gewron, Larson, Schweifler, Shepherd, Spetaro,
Warmington.
Nays: None
MOTION PASSED
b. Fisherman's Landing RFP. LEISURE SERVICES
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To direct staff as to which proposal. if either, to pursue for
the use of Fisherman's Landing.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: See attached
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Leisure Services Board recommended that
to delay action for 30 days to allow both parties to work out an agreement, but to
work with Great Lakes to determine what an equal swap may be during that time.
The public hearing opened at 6:13 p.m. to hear and consider any comments from
the public. Public comments were heard from Chris Kelly (6:18), Mr. Burns 6:27),
Dave Wendtland (6:44), Wayne Grossbeck (6:56), Skeeter Warner (7:01)
(Charlevoix survey passed out). Debra Hawkins (7:01), Don Zutter (7:31), Jack
Harrington (7:35), Greg Wagner (7:37), Thomas Hamilton (7:39), William Barefoot
(7:43), and Joan Benedict (7:47). A recess was given at 7:19 and reconvened at
7:31.
Motion by Commissioner Spataro, second by Commissioner Schweifler to edopt in
principel the proposal submitted by Great Lakes to relocate Fisherman's Lending end
to present a Development Agreement to the Commission in 90 deys.
DATE: May 23, 2002 ~Aut~~ ,J,
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners ~ ~
FROM: Robert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services ~t4i\i w,,
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: 00-63 Address: 1916
Leahy.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
1916 Leahy is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be demolished
within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be directed to
obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and City Clerk
be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with the lowest
responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: #00-63, 1916 Leahy, Muskegon, Ml
Location and ownership: This structure is a church (Revival Temple) located on
Leahy in the Marsh Neighborhood between E. Holbrook and Keating Avenue.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
7/11/00, a notice and order to repair was issued 8/18/00. The case was brought
before the HBA in January 2002. The case was tabled for 30 days because Rev.
Duncan called the Inspection Department and spoke with Bob Grabinski, stating
that repairs were finished and he would call for a final inspection. A final
inspection was scheduled, but the Rev. failed to appear for it. The building
inspector said repairs are started, but not finished. The case was brought before
the HBA again in March 2002 and no one from the church appeared. The case
was declared substandard, a public nuisance, and dangerous building on that
date. There has been no contact from the church since scheduling the
inspection.
Owner Contact: There has been no contact since the Jan. 2002 HBA meeting.
Financial Impact: General Fund
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: NA- church
Estimated cost to repair: $3,000
F:\lnspectio11s\Grabi11ski_l.orraine\ Word\CC MEETINUS\Agenda 1916 !.eahy.doc page I of2
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, June 11, 2002.
F:\lnspcctions\Grnbinski__ Lorraine\ Word\CC MEETINUS\Agenda 1916 l.eahy.t!oc page 2 of2
J-l- I _ l! I
;1--- - l
I------ ----
r=-=_: ·.---
i'l
-"'-f '"- - __
------
,OL_ - 1_
-- --- ------ -
: !-~==- ---- ~
! :, : ~=~-:=
gl- - - ~f~---- - --- '
,
:----1--- - ;~---
"' I
~
m 85!
~-------11 -- :r---_-
r---- ------]-: J------- -
i- ' -
l-_-_-_- ,,,f-~=]; - = ~ _]--:
~1======
0
(j 1ao --- _____ _
---1 ------~ =-==-- =-===-;
--i
,*
----r:i----- --------: _ 1
--=~---; "-=-=--7
~
l J---I---~
J====~,
'f'
___ , -----rr: =~~~=-; }~==--
-- --- - - - _ -_ _
{ -- - 12:
___Jr----o~-----~
9------- s i
--- ; "
g--------- --- ¥ J-- ~lilJ J
g
:-:r~~ b :_-----1' --- : )----~ _:_:_:_, }-=-=, _:__:it:_Jn {
I' --- ~ t::_:_: - : l=_:_-:_: _:-__:-: l_- -- -t,___I_ l i
- - -- ! l-::_-_-_-_ - --- ; }--- ~ ' _______ i _ I _lis J-
- ------- -- I_ -----" ---"r--=--~-=- _ _ _ _ _. ____________ 0 _ _ _ _ 1___ r __ L
-
For The Inspection Dept. 41'1523
City of Muskegon
FROM CITY ASSESSOR'S RECORDS
OWNER
PROPERTY &] @f@ldit., '"')
PLATE# 11313
DESCRIPTION Plat A Muskegon Hts 22. & 23 & 24 Blk 26
FROM RECORDS OF TRANSNATION TITLE COMPANY
LIBER: 1987
PAGE: 367
DATE OF DEED: April 25, 1997
GRANTOR: I f iifl'6f:Fl1:::r'rffi'iilffllffi'lllli:.i~tilranlfibl1'.;1'~~1\I
GRANTEE:
LIENS OR MORTGAGES: 1987-371 Mortgage
DATE: June 27, 200°;it 8: ~o AM
ABSTRACTED BY: ~
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
~e
The above information is to be used for reference purposes only and
not to be relied upon as evidence of title and/or encumbrances.
Accordingly, said information is furnished at a reduced rate, and
the Company's liability shall in no event exceed the amount paid for
said information, should evidence of title and/or encumbrances be
desired, application for title insurance should be placed with
Transnation Title Insurance Company.
TAX REPORT
Affecting land in Muskegon County, Michigan
described as follows:
Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 26, Plat A Muskegon Heights of the Revised Plat
(of 1903) of the City of Muskegon. as recorded in Liber 3 of Plats, Page 71,
Muskegon County Records.
Permanent Property No. 61-24-675-026-0022-00
An examination of the records for the period of fifteen years prior to the date hereof shows no Taxes or
Special IR1)rovement Assessments unpaid, sold, subject to redenption or deeded, except as specified below.
TOis report includes information obtained from the records in the office of the Treasurers of Muskegon County
and of the City of Muskegon after said information has been received by the Treasurer in the form of an
assessment roll. This report also includes, but without any representation by Transnation Title Insurance
Corrpany as to the accuracy thereof, information obtained from Village and Township Treasurers, and from
Treasurers of Cities other then the City of Muskegon, Inheritance or Estate Taxes end Federal Tax Liens, if
any, are not included in this report.
Taxes are exempt, however, assessment and delinquent usage has been
added to tax bill.
CITY OR VILLAGE TAXES
None.
STATE AND COUNTY TAXES
I 1997 Sidewalk Assessment tax due in the amount of $506.00, if paid by
July 31. 2000, plus penalties and interest. if any.
1998 Sidewalk Assessment tax due in the amount of $337.89 and
Delinquent water/sewer usage due in the amount of $685.21. if paid by
July 31, 2000, plus penalties and interest.
1999 Sidewalk Assessment tax due in the amount of $355.14, if paid by
July 31, 2000, plus penalties and interest.
Current status of sidewalk.assessment: Payoff $1,496.37, if paid by
July 31. 2000.
Current status of Delinquent water/sewer usage due in the amount of
$1,722.37.
MEMBER OF MICHIGAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
\ Form No. H867 .6
(Previ0<1s No. T814)
!I
NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION
DATE: May 23, 2002
1916 Leahy
(Address of Property)
TO: All owners and interested parties:
Revival Temple Church. 1916 Leahy, Muskegon, Ml 49442
(Name of Owner)
Rev. James Duncan Jr. 309 E. Hackley, Muskegon. Ml 49444
(Other interested parties)
On March 7, 2002, the Muskegon Housing Board of Appeals made a determination that
the subject property is sub-standard, a public nuisance and a dangerous building under
the City Code and ordered that it be repaired or demolished.
The City Commission will hold a hearing on June 11, 2002, to consider the above decision of
the Housing Board of Appeals. You may appear at this hearing at 5 :30 p.m. on June 11, 2002 , at
the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, with counsel, if you desire, to
present any revelent evidence and arguments concerning the decision to demolish the ab9ve
structures.
~a:r~GfilEALS
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT,
By-11------------------
R ert B. Grabinski, Director of Inspections
F:IINSPECTIONSIGRABINSKI_LORRAINEIWORD\CC MEETINGS\STANDARD FORMS\NOTICE OF CITY COMMISSION
HEARING.DOC
I
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY OF MUSKEGON HOUSING (BUILDING) BOARD OF APPEALS
Date: March 12, 2002
To: Revival Temple Church. 1916 Leahy, Muskegon. Ml 49442
Owners Name & Address
Rev. James Duncan Jr. 309 E. Hackley, Muskegon. Ml 49444
Names & Addresses of Other Interested Parties
ORDER TO DEMOLISH STRUCTURE
The Housing Board of Appeals, having received evidence at a scheduled and
noticed meeting held on Thursday, March 7, 2002 does hereby order that the following
structure(s) located at 1916 Leahy, Muskegon, Michigan, shall be demolished for the
reason that the said structure or structures are found, based upon the evidence before
the Board of Appeals, to be dangerous, substandard and a public nuisance.
The owners or persons interested shall apply for the required permits to demolish the
structure(s) within 30 days from the final determination to concur and demolish, if it is
made by the City Commission. Demolition shall be accomplished no later than 60 days
after a concurrence by the City Commission.
The director of inspections is ordered to place before the Muskegon City
Commission this order and the record in this case to seek concurrence by the City
Commission with the decision of this board, and further to give notice to the owner and
interested parties of the date and time when this matter shall be considered by the City
Commission. This order is not final until concurred with by the City Commission.
F:IINSPECTIONSIGRABINSKI_LORRAINEIWORD\HBA MEETINGS\STANDARD FORMS\ORDER TO DEMOLISH.DOC
I r
NOTICE TO OWNER AND INTERESTED PARTIES
Please take notice that this decision of the Housing Board of Appeals will be
presented to the City Commission of the City of Muskegon on the date and at a time to
be noticed to you by the Director of Inspections. You are hereby notified that you will
have an opportunity to appear before the said City Commission at that time and to
present any and all evidence or matters relevant to the issue of demolition or repair of
the said structures. This order of the Housing Board of Appeals is not final, but will
become final if and when the City Commission has considered the record and this
order, and has concurred.
The City Commission may concur with this order, or disapprove or modify the
order.
Robe B. Grabinski, Director of Inspections
F:IINSPECTIONSIGRABINSKI_LORRAINEIWORDIHBA MEETINGSISTANDARD FORMSIORDER TO DEMOLISH.DOC
( •··.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY OF MUSKEGON HOUSING (BUILDING) BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF HEARING
Date: February 26, 2002
Address of the Property: 1916 Leahy. Muskegon MI
Description of the Structure: Plat A Musk. Heights Lots 22, 23. & 24 Blk 26
TO: Revival Temple Church. 1916 Leahy. Muskegon. MI 49442
[Name & Address of Owner]
Rev. James Duncan Jr. 309 E. Hackley. Muskegon. MI 49444
Names & Addresses of Other Interested Parties]
Please take notice that on Thursday. March 7. 2002 , the City of Muskegon Housing
Board of Appeals will hold a hearing at 933 Terrace. Muskegon. MI at 5:30 o'clock p.m,
and at the said hearing consider whether or not the following strncture should be determined to
be dangerous, substandard and a nuisance, and demolished, or repaired.
The reason for this hearing is that you have not complied with the Notice and Order
issued 8/18/00.
At the hearing on Thursday, March 7, 2002 , at 5:30 o'clock p.m., at the Muskegon
City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, you may appear and present any relevant
evidence to the Housing Board of Appeals and have counsel of your choice present, if you desire,
to show cause why the structure should not be allowed or ordered demolished.
Hblivi~~F
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTION DEPARTMENT,
:y APPEALS
Rober! B. Grabinski, Director of Inspections
F:\INSPECTIONS\GRABINSKI_LORRAINE\WORD\HBA MEETINGS\STANOARO FORMS\NOTICE OF HBA HEARING.DOC
23ln24-6703
FAX/722-1214
(
Auusor
231n24-6708
FAxn26-Sl8I
Cemetery
231n2u1SJ
FAX1726-5617
CMIScnfc:e
231nl4-67l6
FAX/71....... 05 West Mkblgan's Sbordlne Oty
Clerk
231nl4-670S
FAX/724--4178
Comm. & Neigh,
Servtc:cs
231nl4-6717 January 8, 2002
FAX/716-2501
Engineering Revival Temple Church
23ln24-6707
FAX/727-4-6705
FAX/724-4178 CITY OF MUSKEGON
Comm. & Nel&h,
StniCH NOTICE OF HEARING ON
23 ln24-6717
FAX/726-2501 DANGEROUS AND UNSAFE CONDITIONS
Engineering
HOUSIN~ BOARD OF APPEALS
231n>4-6707
FAXnl7""6904
Finance
23In24-671J
FAX/724-6768 September 25, 2000
Fire Dept.
231n24-6792
FAX/724-6985
Revival Temple Church
Income Tai: 1916 Leahy
231n24-6770
FAX/724-6768 Muskegon MI 49441
Info. System,
131n>4-6744 Dear Property Owner:
FAX/722-4301
Leisure Senice SUBJECT: Dangerous Building Case #00-63 - 1916 Leahy, Muskegon MI
l3tn2u104
F AX/724,. 1196
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing before the Housing Board of Appeals for the City
Manager's Office
23In24-6724
of Muskegon will be held on Thursday, October 5, 2000 at 5:30 P.M. in the Muskegon
FAX/722-1214 City Hall Commission Chambers on the first floor. Said hearing will be for the purpose of
Mayor's Office
determining whether the structure should be demolished or otherwise made safe.
23In24-6701
FAX/722-1214
Officials from the Inspection Services Department have inspected the structure and it is
Inspection Servktt alleged that it has defects as listed on the attached page(s).
2J1n2u11s
FAX/726-2501
Planning/Zoning
The defects are violations of Section 4-23 of the Muskegon City Code, which defines
23 ln24-6702 dangerous buildings.
FAX/724-6790
Police Dept. At the hearing, the Inspection Services Department will present testimony regarding the
2Jlnl4-6750
FAX/722-5140 alleged defects. You are advised that you or your representative may cross examine the
City's witnesses and you may present testimony in your own behalf and call witnesses in
Publlc Works
231n24-4100 your own behalf. We encourage you to attend the meeting since it is always better if
FAX1722-4188
someone is available to answer any questions the Board may have.
TreHurtr
lJlnl4-6720
FAXJ724--6768 Inspection Services
City of Muskegon
Water Bllllng Dept.
231nl4-6718
F AXn24-6768
Water Flltradon
13tnl....... J06
FAXJ75S-!lil90
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, MI 49443-0536
Affirffiattve Action
?Jl,72-1-6703
FAxn22-121 • (
.-\uusor
231/724-6708
FAX/726-5181
Cemetery
231/724-6783
FA."· .,
- ---
~\=iQ/ ,, ,,,,
#/1 !
---- ~ ~
\/ Q ,,,, ii
,,,,/ \~
~ \~
,...At - ~ I
i - ----~ il
If-
~ /l _-
,;.,\ ' - 1- -- - ' - - --- :
/ / \ Ve, OLC j·[--t- ====- :i· -----: o/)
·~
J " ---- - " r\
I
' "" ,.,,--
- -- ' ' - ' - --- " " --- -----' I:(
:::-' ' --- -- : ' - - -- -- ' '----- ' j
-- . ' "
-----'
- -
--'
' '
'
---
--- ' '
• / -
- - - - ----
N .
.
-
''
'
I
-- __- ,'
/ .
'
a" - - --
--
-
' '"
'" . -·-- '' ''
- - N'
1ll ;:;;
-
-
C c -- - C o . --
-- ' ' - ' ---~ ! '
l
_j
I " • ----1 I /"Cf) __
NOTICE OF HEARING IJEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION
DATE: May 23, 2002
2082 Estes
(Address of Property)
TO: All owners and interested parties:
David VanKammen, 2086 Estes. Muskegon. Ml 49441
(Name of Owner)
Mercantile Mortgage Co. 246 East Janata Blvd, Suite 262. Lombard, IL 60148
(Other interested parties)
.'
On May 2. 2002, the Muskegon Housing Board of Appeals made a determination that
the subject property is sub-standard, a public nuisance and a dangerous building under
the City Code and ordered that it be repaired or demolished.
The City Commission will hold a hearing on .June 11, 2002, to consider the above decision of
the Housing Board of Appeals. You may appear at this hearing at 5:30 p.m. on June 11, 2002, at
the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, with counsel, if you desire, to
present any revelent evidence and arguments concerning the decision to demolish the above
structures.
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT,
~ I E HOUSING BOARD OF APPEALS
~y w__~~-
Rob t 13. Grabinski, Director oflnspections
F:\INSPECTIONS\GRABINSKI_LORRAINE\WORD\CC MEETINGS\STANDARD FORMS\NOTICE OF CITY COMMISSION
HEARING.DOC
t
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY OF MUSKEGON HOUSING (BUILDING) BOARD OF APPEALS
Date: May 3, 2002
To: David VanKammen. 2086 Estes. Muskegon. Ml 49441
Owners Name & Address
None
Names & Addresses of other Interested Parties
ORDER TO DEMOLISH STRUCTURE
The Housing Board of Appeals, having received evidence at a scheduled and
noticed meeting held on Thursday, May 2, 2002 does hereby order that the following
structure(s) located at 2082 Estes, Muskegon, Michigan, shall be demolished for the
reason that the said structure or structures are found, based upon the evidence before
the Board of Appeals, to be dangerous, substandard and a public nuisance.
The owners or persons interested shall apply for the required permits to demolish the
structure(s) within 30 days from the final determination to concur and demolish, if it is
made by the City Commission. Demolition shall be accomplished no later than 60 days
after a concurrence by the City Commission.
The director of inspections is ordered to place before the Muskegon City
Commission this order and the record in this case to seek concurrence by the City
Commission with the decision of this board, and further to give notice to the owner and
interested parties of the date and time when this matter shall be considered by the City
Commission. This order is not final until concurred with by the City Commission.
F:IINSPECTIONS\GRABINSKI_LORRAINEIWORDIHBA MEETINGS\STANDARD FORMSIORDER TO DEMOLISH.DOC
(
NOTICE TO OWNER AND INTERESTED PARTIES
Please take notice that this decision of the Housing Board of Appeals will be
presented to the City Commission of the City of Muskegon on the date and at a time to
be noticed to you by the Director of Inspections. You are hereby notified that you will
have an opportunity to appear before the said City Commission at that time and to
present any and all evidence or matters relevant to the issue of demolition or repair of
the said structures. This order of the Housing Board of Appeals is not final, but will
become final if and when the City Commission has considered the record and this
order, and has concurred.
The City Commission may concur with this order, or disapprove or modify the
order.
FOR THE HOUSING BOARD OF APPEALS:
-~LJ~
RbertB.Grabinski, Director of Inspections
F:\INSPECTIONS\GRABINSKI_LORRAINE\WORDIHBA MEETINGS\STANDARD FORMS\ORDER TO DEMOLISH.DOC
(
May 2, 2002
Re: 2086 Estes
A neighbor of the above address called the office today to inquire about the HBA
meeting. She was referred to me from the Planning/Zoning Dept. They _hi:ilie ·
2082 & 2086 Estes on their agenda (ZBA) because the owner has appealed their
denial to split the parcel. The neighbors were sent letters to voice their opinions
on that appeal.
When the neighbor found out it was also on our agenda this month she wanted
the board to hear her opinion since she can't be at the meeting. She foels that
the owner h~i ~een given so many years to repair his house an<:I she can't . . .
understand W~Y it's been going on for so many yeafs. She is installing siding on
her home this summer and feels that 2086 Estes is bringing the value of ·
surrounding homes down. She would like to be neighborly and say yes, allow
him to split his parcel, but only if he does some repairs on it. ·,
Inspection Dept. Secretary
Lorraine Grabinski
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY OF MUSKEGON HOUSING (BUILDING) BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF HEARING
Date: April 18, 2002
Address of the Property: 2082 Estes
Description of the Structure: Lot 12. Blk 622
TO: David VanKammen, 2086 Estes, Muskegon, MI 49441
[Name & Address of Owner]
Names & Addresses of Other Interested Parties]
. ,
Please take notice that on Thursday, May 2, 2002, the City of Muskegon Housing
Board of Appeals will hold a hearing at 933 Terrace, Muskegon, MI at 5:30 o'clock p.m.,
and at the said hearing consider whether or not the following structure should be determined to
be dangerous, substandard and a nuisance, and demolished, or repaired.
The reason for this hearing is that you have not complied with the Notice and Order to
Repair dated 12/11/01.
At the hearing on Thursday, May 2. 2002 , at 5:30 o'clock p.m., at the Muskegon City
Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, you may appear and present any relevant
evidence to the Housing Board of Appeals and have counsel of your choice present, i(y~u desire,
to show cause why the structure should not be allowed or ordered demolished.
o BEm~~.
CIT..,..........,_MUSKEGON INSPECTION DEPARTMENT,
BY--1------------------
OF APPEALS
Rob rt B. Grabinski, Director oflnspections
C:IWINOOWSITEMPINOTICE OF HBA HEARING.DOC
OWNER """~&a..t&6.'l..l:'1!!fi.~,.IN.UlAODRESS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PHONE _ _ _ __
CON. NMll';jptLl..Ll..L'.Lk~ti.,,,~~DRESS I -o 6 d. p 9,A gA,,<,) °'14 PHONE _ _ _ __
ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER _,___ _ _ _ _ ADDRESS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _\/,H _ _ _ LIC f _ EXP
1
2
LICENSE NUMBER
-
d- I 010 Cl"\<:> 7 '-\ EXPIRATION DATE
FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDI OR REASON FOR EXEMPTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
$ O;)., -
WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE CARRIER OR REASON FOR EXEMPTION
-----------------
MESC EMPLOYER f OR REASON FOR EXEMPTION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
All CONTRACTOR INFORMATION REGISTERED WITH THE COY OF MUSKEGON YES O NO 0
CLASS OF WORK NEW ADDITION O ALTERAT~ REPAIR D
RESIDENT!~ COMMERCIAL O INDUSTRIAL O OTHER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
·sPECIALCONOITIONS --=-----------------,-------------
DESCRIBE WORK _ ___!e~e.C!!Nl=~~=~.J'--ff'P=Y]_,,A'"-"'h__.::_-__,~c..c...,:.=.,=::::;_-1,~=·=-'-.:·
. 1
~----
J. tm A= d , t2 ef'{v 0
USE OF BUILDING_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ CHANGE USE TO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
STARTING DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE READY _ _ _ _ _ r.;n-m=;u,7;;:-rr;;:,_;,;;;--;-==-----
/ t:J/P-
INSPECTION REPORTS
DATI: REMARKS INSP. PERMIT FEE 3'6.7
CALL ADMINISTAATIVE AlmlORITY A MINIMUM OF
24 HOURS PRIOR TO INSPECTK>N
SPECW. CONOOlOO: POUR 00 cot-K:RETE UNTL FORMS ARE APPflO',
Typo ol Const._ _ Oocupancy Group_ _ Dlvlslon_
No. ol Dwelling Unhs _ _ Pruklng spaooa _ _ Bsmt_
PLANS CK BY .OY Front Yard _ _ _ Side Yard-~~ Rollf Yard _ _
Use Zona_ _ _ _ _ Rrs.!~pihl6
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing before the Housing Board of Appeals for the City
Manager's Office of Muskegon will be held on Thursday. October S. 2000 at 5:30 P.M. in the Muskegon
131/714-6724
FAXf722-1114 City Hall Commission Chambers on the first floor. Said hearing will be for the purpose of
Mayor1s Office
detennining whether the structure should be demolished or otherwise made safe.
131n24-6101
FAX/712-1214
Officials from the Inspection Services Department have inspected the structure and it is
Inspection Services alleged that it has defects as listed on the attached page(s).
231/714-6715
FAX/726-2501
Planning/Zoning
The defects are violations of Section 4-23 of the Muskegon City Code, which defines
131/724-6701 dangerous buildings.
FAX/724-6790
Police Dept. At the hearing, the Inspection Services Department will present testimony regarding the
13 tnl4-6750
FAX1712-5140 alleged defects. You are advised that you or your representative may cross examine the
City's witnesses and you may present testimony in your own behalf and call witnesses in
Public Works
1Jln24-4100 your own behalf. We encourage you to attend the meeting since it is always better if
FAX1711-4188 someone is available to answer any questions the Board may have.
Treasurer
131/714-6710
FAX/714-6768 Inspection Services
City of Muskegon
Water Billing Dept,
231/724-6718
FAX/724-6768
Water FUtntion
13 I /714-4106
FAX/755--5190
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, Ml 49443-0536
A!flrmath·e Action
23 t 1724--6703
FAX1712-1214
(
Auusor
23tnz.t-6708
FAxn26-5181
Cemetery
231nl4--6783
FAX/726-5617
Civil Service
FILE copy
1Jtn24--6716
FAX/72"'-'405
Wl'llt Mlddi!an's Sbordlne Oty
Clerk
2J1n2u1os
FAX/714-4178
NOTICE AND ORDER
Comm. & Nelah. August 1, 2000
Servtcn
2Jtn24-6111
FAX/716-1501
Enatneertna David Vankammen
lJlnl-4-6707
FAX/717-69-04 2086 Estes
Finance
Muskegon MI 49441
2Jln24--671J
FAxnl4-6768
Dear Property Owner:
Fire Dept.
131nl4-6792
FAX/724-6985 Subject: 2086 Estes, Muskegon MI
Income Tu
City ofMusk. Revised Plat 1903 Lot 12 Blk 622
1Jtnl4-6770
FAX1714-6768
The City of Muskegon Building Official has recently inspected the subject property and has
Info, System• found the buildings to be dangerous as defined under Section 4-23 of the Muskegon City
1Jln24--6744
FAX/711-4301 Code.
Leisure Service
13 tnl4--6704 As a result of this finding, you are hereby ordered to REPAIR or DEMOLISH the
FAX/714-tt96 structures within thirty (30) days.
Manager'• Office
131n24-6124
FAxnll-1214
If you elect to repair the structures, you must secure all required permits and physically
commence the work within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
Mayor's Office
231/724--6701
FAXnll-1214 Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our
Inspection Services Building Official, Jerry McIntyre at 724-6715.
2Jtnl4-6715
FAX/726-2501
Planning/Zoning
s::;~iu_,
1
231/724-6702
FA..X/724-6790
Police Dept.
2Jtn24-6750 obert B. Grabinski
FAX/721-5140
Fire Marshal/Inspection Services
PubUc Work.I
111n24-4too
FAX/721-4188
Treasurer
23tnl4--67l0
FAX/714--6768
Water Dillin& Dept,
13tnl4-6718
FAX/714-6768
Water Flltratlon
13tnl4-4106
FA.X/75S-Sl90
City or Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, MI 49443-0536
:\ffirmilthe A.:llon
2JJ,7H-6703
FAX"'??!-1?14
( MUSKEGON
A.uessor
2311724-•6708
FAXi7!6-5181
Cemetery
lJlnl-J.-6783
FAxn26-5617
Civil Senice
231nl4-6716
FAXn24-440S West Mlcblgan's ShoreJlne Oty
Clerk
lJtn24-6705
FAXn24-4178
Comm. & Neigh.
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
Senices
2Jtn24-6717
FAXnl6-2501 ~ESTES
Engineering
lJtnl4-6707 7/20/00
.i FAXn27-6904
Finance
2Jln24-6713
FAX1714-6768 Inspection Noted:
Fire Dept.
231/724-6792 1. Home being used for storage.
FA.'X/724-6985
2. Damaged vehicle left in yard - not current plates.
Income Tax 3. Roof covering severely deteriorated.
lJl/724--6770
F AX/724-6768 4. Chimney deteriorated.
5. Numerous broken out, boarded windows.
Info. Systems
231/724-6744 6. Front porch structural damage - repair~ rebuild to code.
FAxnl2-4301
7. Debris thrown in yard.
Leisure Service 8. Siding on garage and home (Storage) deteriorating.
231/724-6704
FA.X/724-1196
9. Window frames need repair.
10. Side porch, landing need replace - repair to code.
Manager's Office
231/724--6724
FAX/722-1214
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
Mayor's Office
231/72.t-6701
FAX1722-1214
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON
Jo,p«tlonS,mcec1TY CODE
231nl4-6715 •
FAX/126-2501
Police Dept.
231/724-6750
FAX/722-5140
Public Works CONCURRED IN: ,
231/724-4100
FAX1722-4188
Date
Treasurer
231/724-6720
FAX.n24-6768
Water Billing Dept.
231/724-6718
FAXn24-6768
Water Filtration
2Jlnl4-4106
F A."y Statue prior 10 recotdfog of this dotumeot.
ThM neither the Mortgagot{s), or !he Mor1gagor{s) heirs, e;,:~u1ors, adm!oislra!OlS, or person c!ailning
1111d-er-0nc of them has responded in II flllcen• (!S) day period. ~
FURTHER DEPONENT SAITH NOT. Ill
C.
~(~ D~II
agent fllr; MLA, lne.
~
~ STAtE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF MACOMl\
D
~
The foregolng instrnrne11t was acknowledged before me on thb ~day of 4uq" s± , 1001, b y ~
MlIQffiY,, agent for Ml A tNC NJ Obin Cmp,mlion- ...
'J),,{).,,y, P-.t. ~4·,
County, Notary PUblk
My Commission E)ipiru: ft· I g,>ot"?4
~- Q!BOAA!l L. ZOLNDSIO
DRAFTED BY ANO WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: ,...,_,.-eoo,,,\11
Mi _ _ ,.._,a,iait_
0 MLA,Mhchdl
Dal~
Inc.
30Sll Schocnhrn"
Wam:n. Mich\pn ~I09J
'
.c
For The Inspection Dept. 419370
City of Muskegon
FROM CITY ASSESSOR'S RECORDS
OWNER MLA Inc.
PROPERTY 1836 Nevada.
PLATE# 24-480-002-008-00
DESCRIPTION Jeannot Court Blk 2 Lot 8
FROM RECORDS OF TRANSNATION TITLE COMPANY
LIBER: 3267
PAGE: 291
DATE OF DEED: August 24, 2001
GRANTOR NAME & ADDRESS: Don Hulbert, Deputy Sheriff for Muskegon
County, 25 w. Walton
GRANTEE NAME & ADDRESS: ;l1~~Jnl:;.','Ljj,\i~ Ohio
Corporation, 30521
Schoenherr, Warren, MI 48093
LIENS OR MORTGAGES: 3333/375, 3359/921, 3155/316
TODAY'S DATE: March 20, 2001
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 21, 2002 at 8:00 AM
ABSTRACTED BY: &k. :K. ~
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE C O M P ~
The above information is to be used for reference purposes only a
not to be relied upon as evidence of. the title and/or encumbrancE
Accordingly, said information is furnished at a reduced rate, anc
the Company's liability shall in no event exceed the amount paid
said information, should evidence of title and/or encumbrances b,
desired, application for title insurance should be placed with
Transnation Title Insurance Company.
I-IBA Minutes 5/02
Motion made by Randy Mackie, supported by Jon Rolewicz to support staff's
recommendation.
A roll cal vote was taken:
AYES: NAYES: EXCUSED: ABSENT:
Greg Borgman
Randy Mackie
John Warner
Jerry Bever
Jon Rolewicz
Clara Shepherd
Nick Kroes
The motion carried.
Case #02-06- 1836 Nevada - MLA Inc. 30521 Schoenherr, Warren, Ml 48093
Robert Parker was present to represent this property. He is considering buying
it. Board stated this house looks very bad, they saw it last night. Mr. Grabinski
stated the gas company was called yesterday (5/1/02) to shut the gas off
because of a leak. Mr. Grabinski asked who is selling, Mr. Parker told him Ed
Peters, R & R for MLA. Ms. Shepherd asked what he plans to do with the
property if he buys it. He replied that he would consider buying after the interior
inspection. If he bought it he would repair and sell. Since he legally has no
interest, an interior inspection cannot be set up with Mr. Parker. Mr. Grabinski
stated if Mr. Peters wants to proceed he must call.
Staff Recommendation:. Declare this building substandard, a public nuisance,
and dangerous building and forward to city commission for their concurrence.
Motion made by Randy Mackie, seconded by John Warner, to support staff's
recommendation.
A roll cal vote was taken:
AYES NAYES: EXCUSED: ABSENT:
Greg Borgman
Randy Mackie
John Warner
Jerry Bever
Jon Rolewicz
Clara Shepherd
Nick Kroes
The motion carried.
6 of 8
DATE: May 23, 2002
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: 01-053 Address: 1458
Sixth
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
1458 Sixth is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that ii be
demolished within thirty (30) days. It is further requested that administration be
directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with
the lowest responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: 01-053, 1458 Sixth St.
Location and ownership: This structure is located on Sixth Street between
Grand and Washington. It is owned by Daniel Herrema of Grandville.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted
12/12/01. A Notice and Order to repair or demolish was issued 12/18/01. HBA
on 02/07/02 found the structure to be dangerous and unsafe.
Owner Contact: The owner talked to Bob Grabinski on 3/6/02 and was given a
60-day extension to complete repairs. No permits have been pulled and there
has been no contact with the owner since then.
Financial Impact: CDBG
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $17,200
Estimated cost to repair: $25,000
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, June 11, 2002.
F:\lnspections\Grabinski_Lorraine\ Word\CC MEET!NGS\Agcnda 1458 sixth.doc page I of I
ll\5K s I 'J.TH
[
\ __ _
----- - --~ ,--- _____ _
--- 1------
314 0 300 292 ----- -
0 246
297 291
----W AS-ki I
"'
"'
"
~
----~--- -~r--\ ] :1 - l__ - -
N
~~------
-- _ l ____ ~ - - - - - - - -
314 0 296 284
,/ ______ _
250
----------~-
238 230 224
{_ 216 206
bRf-\-1\JD
315 305
- -i- -
295
a,
0)
-------I____ _ 249 237 229
---~ -
223- 215
-7
205
----- - "
~
-------- ------
(0
0
I
1---- "'
- -- -- ---
-----------
----- _J
/;,
"'
~borTitle
955 West Broadway
Muskegon,MI49441
Title Search
Case No.: 100122653
December 13, 200 l
I. Beginning Date: 5/9/2000, at 8:00 A.M.
Please See Attached Liber 3042, Page 734, Muskegon County Records, for Legal Description:
2. We have searched the records in the office of the Register ofDeeds for Muskegon County, Michigan covering the
subject property, and find the following conveyances and undischarged encumbrances, from said beginning date to
11/14/2001, at 8:00 A.M.
Documents
Deeds: Mortgages:
Liber 3042, Page 734 Liber 3088, Page 592
Taxes:
Proof of payment of invoice fees, due and payable to the
City of Muskegon in the amount of$1,105.92 (Invoice
#9816615,#9817031,#9817970,#9818482,#9819519,
#9820206, #9821864, #9822822).
Proof of payment of delinquent water/sewer usage bill, due
and payable to the City of Muskegon in the amount of
$503.80, if paid by December 31, 2001.
Payment of the 2000 delinquent taxes, due and , .
payable to the Muskegon County Treasurer in the
amount of$663.00, if paid by December 31, 2001.
Payment of the 2001 Winter taxes, due and payable to the
City of Muskegon Treasurer in the amount of $1,167.13, if
paid by February 14, 2002. (Base amount - $606.55**)
Note:
No 2001 Summer taxes were assessed.
Pennanent Parcel No.: 61-24-205-405-0014-00.
2001 State Equalized Value: $17,200.00.
2001 Taxable Value: $10,825.00.
Non-Homestead Property.
**NOTE: A Delinquent Water/Sewer Usage Bill in
the amount of$560.58 will be included in the 2001
Winter Tax Bill.
3 We find no United States Internal Revenue Liens recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Muskegon
4. No search has been made for any instrument, however designated, which has been filed as a financing statement
pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code.
5. No search has been made of the records of the Circuit, Probate or other Courts, or of any record other than those in
the office of the Register of Deeds.
6. Under this form of search this company is not an insurer of above title, nor does it guarantee the title or any
evidence of title thereto.
7. Note: In consideration of the fact that the above infonnation is to be used for reference purposes only and not
relied upon as evidence of title, it is furnished at a reduced rate and this Company's liability is limited to the amount
paid for this information. ·
' ,
NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION
DATE: May 23, 2002
1458 Sixth
(Address of Property)
TO: All owners and interested parties:
Daniel Herrema, 455 Buckshot Dr. Grandville, Ml 49418
(Name of Owner)
Equicredit, 2851 Charlevoix Dr. SE Suite 304, Grand Rapids, Ml 49546-7048
(Other interested parties)
On February 7, 2002, the Muskegon Housing Board of Appeals made a determination
that the subject property is sub-standard, a public nuisance and a dangerous building
under the City Code and ordered that it be repaired or demolished.
The City Commission will hold a hearing on .June 11, 2002, to consider the above decision of
the Housing Board of Appeals. You may appear at this hearing at 5 :30 p.m. on June 11, 2002 , at
the Muskegon City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, with counsel, if you desire, to
present any revelent evidence and arguments concerning the decision to demolish the above
structures.
CITY OF MUSKEGON INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT,
FO fil~L:r.s
By_ _ _ _ , ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Robert ~- Grabinski, Director oflnspections
F:IINSPECTIONSIGRABINSKI_LORRAINEIWORD\CC MEETINGS\STANDARD FORMSINOTICE OF CITY COMMISSION
HEARING.DOC
Affirmative Action
2J1n24-610J
FAX/722-1214 MUSKEGON
Assessor
2J1n24-61os
FAxn26-5181
Cemetery
231n24-678J
FAX/726-5617
Civil Service
2J1n24-6116
FAX/7244405 West Michigan's Shoreline City
Clerk
231n24-610s Daniel Herrema
FAX/724-4178
455 Buckshot Dr.
Comm. & Neigh. Grandville, Ml 49418
Services
231/724-6717
FAX1726-2501 March 6, 2002
Engineering
2Jtn24-6707
FAX1727-6904
Re: 1458 Sixth St.
Finance
23tn24-6713
Dear Mr. Herrema:
FAX/724--6768
Fire Dept. The 60 day extension you requested for completion of repairs at 1458 Sixth
231n24-61n
FAX/724-6985
Street has been granted. You are required to pull a minimal permit for the
repairs that are in process, such as drywall and possibly the electrical work.
Income Tax
231n24-6770
FAX/724-6768 It is very important that you schedule your final inspection as soon as the work is
Info, Systems completed. )t,must be conducted before the May 6, 2002 d,eadline.
23In24-6744
FAKn22-4301
Failure to comply with the deadline will result in the case being brought before
Leisure Service
2J1n24-6104
the City Commission for their concurrence to demolish the structure.
FAX1724-1196
Manager's Office If you have any questions, please call the Inspection Department at 231-724-
231n24-6724 6715.
;~~;1:r'
~;~;~:. "~iUJ:_
FAX/722-1214
M,yo,•,om« Sincerely,
llJr
' obert B. Gr~ski • •
PJ,nolng/Zonlog irector of Inspections
231/724-6702
FAX/724-6790
Police Dept.
RBG/lg
231/724-6750
FAX/722-5140
Public Works
231/724-4100
FAX/722-4188
Treasurer
2311724-6720
FAX1724-6768
Water BIiiing Dept.
2311724-6718
FAX/724-6768
Water Filtration
2J1n24--4to6
FAX/755-5190
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, MI 49443-0536
Mar 05 02 11: 57a Exit Advantage Realt~ (616)514-5015 p. I
(' ('
8Db 6ml,~t,· 1
,
T
.,
I ..
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY OF MUSKEGON HOUSING (BUILDING) BOARD OF APPEALS
Date: February 11, 2002
To: Daniel Herrema, 455 Buckshot Dr., Grandville, Ml 49418
Owners Name & Address
Equicredit, 2851 Charlevoix Dr. SE, Suite 304, Grand Rapids, Ml 49546-
7048
Names & Addresses of Other Interested Parties
ORDER TO DEMOLISH STRUCTURE
The Housing Board of Appeals, having received evidence at a scheduled and
noticed meeting held on Thursday, February 7, 2002 does hereby order that the
following structure(s) located at 1458 Sixth St. Muskegon, Michigan, shall be
demolished for th,e reason that the said structure or structures.are found, based upon
the evidence before the Board of Appeals, to be dangerous, substandard and a public
nuisance.
The owners or persons interested shall apply for the required permits to demolish the
structure(s) within 30 days from the final determination to concur and demolish, if it is
made by the City Commission. Demolition shall be accomplished no later than 60 days
after a concurrence by the City Commission.
The director of inspections is ordered to place before the Muskegon City
Commission this order and the record in this case to seek concurrence by the City
Commission with the decision of this board, and further to give notice to the owner and
interested parties of the date and time when this matter shall be considered by the City
Commission. This order is not final until concurred with by the City Commission.
F:\INSPECTIONS\GRABINSKI_LORRAINE\WORD\HBA MEETINGS\STANDARD FORMS\ORDER TO DEMOLISH.DOC
/
NOTICE TO OWNER AND INTERESTED PARTIES
Please take notice that this decision of the Housing Board of Appeals will be
presented to the City Commission of the City of Muskegon on the date and at a time to
be noticed to you by the Director of Inspections. You are hereby notified that you will
have an opportunity to appear before the said City Commission at that time and to
present any and all evidence or matters·relevant to the issue of demolition or repair of
the said structures. This order of the Housing Board of Appeals is not final, but will
become final if and when the City Commission has considered the record and this
order, and has concurred.
The City Commission may concur with this order, or disapprove or modify the
order.
.'
B. Grabinski, Director of Inspections
F:IINSPECTIONS\GRABINSKI_LORRAINEIWORD\HBA MEETINGS\STANDARD FORMSIORDER TO DEMOLISH.DOC
r·
CITY OF MUSKEGON
CITY OF MUSKEGON HOUSING (BUILDING) BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF HEARING
Date: January 28, 2002
Address of the Property: 1458 Sixth, Muskegon MI
Description of the Structure: Lot 14, Blk 405
TO: Daniel Herrema, 455 Buckshot Dr. Grandville, MI 49418
[Name & Address of Owner]
Equicredit, 2851 Charlevoix Dr. SE Suite 304, Grand Rapids, MI 49546-7048
Names & Addresses of Other Interested Parties]
Please take notice that on Thursday, February 7, 2002, the City of Muskegon Housing
Board of Appeals will hold a hearing at 933 Te,nce, Muskegon, MI at 5:30 o'clock p.m,
and at the said hearing consider whether or not the following structure should be determined to
be dangerous, substandard and a nuisance, and demolished, or repaired.
The reason for this hearing is that you have not complied with the notice and order to
repair issued 12/17/0 I.
At the hearing on Thursday, Februar:y 7, 2002 , at 5:30 o'clock p.m., at the Muskegon
City Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Michigan, you may appear and present any relevant
evidence to the Housing Board of Appeals and have counsel of your choice present, if you desire,
to show cause why the structure should not be allowed or ordered demolished.
CITx.-trhMUSKEGON INSPECTION DEPARTMENT,
0 B E H ~ ~ ~ ~ F APPEALS
By_ __,c__________________
Rob t B. Grabinski, Director of Inspections
F:IINSPECTIONS\GRABINSKI_LORRAINEIWORD\HBA MEETINGSISTANDARD FORMS\NOTICE OF HBA HEARING.DOC
CITY OF MUSKEGON
NOTICE AND ORDER TO REPAIR OR REMOVE (DEMOLISH) A STRUCTURE
DATE: December 17, 2001
Address of the Property: 1458 Sixth, Muskegon, Michigan
TO: Daniel Herrema, 455 Buckshot Dr. Grandville, Ml 49418
[Name & Address of Owner]
Equicredit, 2851 Charlevoix Dr. SE Suite 304 Grand Rapids, Ml 49546-7048
(Interested Parties)
The Building Inspection Department of the City of Muskegon has determined that the
structures above described are dangerous, substandard, and constitute a nuisance in violation of the
Dangerous Buildings Or.dinance of the City.
You are hereby notified that the City will proceed to demolish or cause the demolition and
removal of the said structure unless you accomplish the actions indicated below within the time limits
indicated (only one to be checked):
1. X Obtain the issuance of all permits required to accomplish the repair of the
structure defects listed in the attached schedule within 30 days of this notice. All
repairs shall be accomplished within the times set forth in the permits. All work
must be physically commenced within 30 days of the date of this notice.
2. _ __ Obtain the issuance of the appropriate permit for the demolition of structures
within 30 days, and accomplish the demolition thereof within 60 days of this
notice.
The conditions which cause the said structures to be dangerous, substandard and a nuisance
are listed in the attached schedule.
(
'
FAILURE TO COMPLY
After 30 days from mailing this notice, if you have not complied with this notice, a hearing will
be scheduled before the City of Muskegon Housing Board of Appeals for the purpose of enforcing
this notice and order and instituting City action to remove the structure. You will receive notice of that
hearing. You may appear and present any relevant evidence to the Housing Board of Appeals and
have counsel of your choice present, if you desire. You will have the opportunity to show cause why
the structure shall not be ordered demolished.
SCHEDULE OF CONDITIONS
The following conditions are present at the structure at 1458 Sixth, Muskegon, Michigan, and
cause said structure to be a dangerous or substandard building and a public nuisance.
Please see the attached inspection report
\.u,,t'-r-<..JF MUSKEGON INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
U:.t_~~.
, , Rob rt B. Grabinski, Director of Inspections
(
\.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT
1458 Sixth St.
12112/01
Inspection noted:
1. An interior inspection is required by all trade inspectors (plumbing, mechanical,
electrical and building) before any permits or certificates of occupancy will be
issued.
2. Home is boarded up.
3. Deteriorating roof covering, soffit, fascia.
4. Back porch rail knocked off porch.
5. Damaged
. , siding comer cap .
6. Broken windows.
BASED UPON MY RECENT INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY, I HAVE
DETERMINED THAT THE STRUCTURE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A
DANGEROUS AND/OR SUBSTANDARD BUILDING AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
4-23 OF THE MUSKEGON CITY CODE.
FALTINOWSKI, BUILDING INSPECTOR
F:llnspections\Grabinski_Lorraine\Word\DANGEROUS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORTS\1458
Sixth.doc
I IBA Minutes 2/02
Jerry Bever
Jon Rolewicz
ara Shepherd
The tion carried.
Case #01 55 - 431 Monroe - Bennie Chambers, 1090 L geland,
Muskegon
No one was pres t to represent this case. There s been no contact with the
owner. There has IJ en no interior inspection. . Shepherd stated the home
has been vacant for 5-
Staff Recommendation:. De re subst aard, a public nuisance, and a
dangerous building, and forwa to C" Commission for their concurrence.
Motion made by Jerry Bever an sec ded by John Warner to support staff's
recommendation.
A roll cal vote was take
AYES: AYES: EXCUSED: ABSENT:
Greg Borgma
Randy Mac ·e Nick Kroes
John War er
Jerry B er
/rn
Jon lewicz
Shepherd
/ h e motion carried.
Case #01-053 - 1458 Sixth St. - Daniel Herrema, 455 Buckshot Dr.
Grandville, Ml
No one was present to represent this case. Mr. Grabinski gave a history on the
case. Mr. Herrema did a nice job fixing the house. It was then left vacant and
vandals ruined it. There have also been squatters.
Staff Recommendation:. Declare substandard, a public nuisance, and a
dangerous building, and forward to City Commission for their concurrence.
Motion made by Clara Shepherd and seconded by Randy Mackie to support
staff's recommendation.
A roll cal vote was taken:
9 of 12
HBA Minutes 2/02
AYES: NAYES: EXCUSED: ABSENT:
Greg Borgman
Randy Mackie Nick Kroes
John Warner
Jerry Bever
Jon Rolewicz
Clara Shepherd
The motion carried.
Case #01-058 -1525 Huizenga - Brian Miller, 1525 Huizenga, Muskegon
M . Grabinski gave a history of the case. It had a devastating fire. It is known a
the uff and puff" case. The owner is serving a year in jail because of the
charg against him in this case. The back of the structure completely coll sed.
The own r was huffing propane and smoking and blew the walls out. Th e has
been no c tact with the owner in regard to his house.
Staff Recomm dation:. Declare substandard, a public nuisance nd a
dangerous buildi , and forward to City Commission for their c ncurrence.
Motion made by Cla Shepherd and seconded by Rand ackie to support
staff's recommendatio
A roll cal vote was taken:
AYES: NAYES: EXC SEO: ABSENT:
Greg Borgman
Randy Mackie Nick Kroes
John Warner
Jerry Bever
Jon Rolewicz
Clara Shepherd
The motion carried.
rd
Case #01-056 - 50 Octavius - Clayton National In 4 Corporate Dr. 3
Floor, Shelton, 06484
No one was resent to represent this case. A board up reque came from the
MPD. Th e have been other issues. Inspections got in, the ho e was open.
The city id do a rehab on this house for the former owners, but th are no
longe involved. There has been no contact from Mortgage Compan
10 of 12
DATE: May 23, 2002
TO: Honorable Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: Robert Grabinski, Director of Inspection Services
RE: Concurrence with the Housing Board of Appeals Notice and Order
to Demolish. Dangerous Building Case#: 02-01 Address: 1715
Superior.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: This is to request that the City Commission Concur
with the findings of the Housing Board of Appeals that the structure located at
1715 Superior is unsafe, substandard, a public nuisance and that it be
demolished within thirty (30) days. 11 is further requested that administration be
directed to obtain bids for the demolition of the structure and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized and directed to execute a contract for demolition with
the lowest responsible bidder.
Case# & Project Address: 02-01, 1715 Superior
Location and ownership: This structure is located in the Marsh Neighborhood
and is owned by Amy Bradley of Fruitport, Ml.
Staff Correspondence: A dangerous building inspection was conducted on
6/23/98. Some work was done without permits after that time. Another
inspection was conducted 1/22/02 after a fire. A Notice and Order to Repair was
issued on 1/30/02. No one was present to represent the case before the HBA on
3/7 /02 and the structure was declared substandard and dangerous. The owner
called the Inspection Dept. after that date and scheduled an interior inspection,
which was conducted 3/25/02. On 4/29/02 the owner called the office and
inquired on what to do next. She was informed she needed to submit a schedule
of repairs and apply for permits. There has been no contact since that date. The
city has had the structure boarded on 3 separate occassions.
Owner Contact: Owner has not been in contact with this office since 7/20/01. At
the HBA meeting in September, he was told he could stop this from going before
the City Commission by scheduling an interior inspection and supplying this
office with a time line for repairs.
Financial Impact: CDBG
Budget action required: None
State Equalized value: $14,000
Estimated cost to repair: $20,000
F:\lnspections\Grabinski __ Lorraine\ Word\CC MEETINGS\Agcnda ! 715 Superior.doc page I of2
Staff Recommendation: To concur with the Housing Board of Appeals decision to
demolish.
City Commission Recommendation: The commission will consider this item at it's
meeting Tuesday, June 11, 2002.
F:\Jnspections\Grabinski_Lorrninc\Word\CC MEE·1·1NGS\/\ge11da 1715 Superior.doc page 2 of2
'--·
'•-
-~----
I --i-----.-.- - - , - - - - - - - -
1 I I l
\)>
1 -
1 1 I\ I I I 1~-
'
I
1 I I I I · I
I
I
i I
,
I
, ,
I
1·
I
,
I
1
I I
,
:
,
I
1
I
\
•
,
I 1
i- { ' ~
-~Plumbing/Mechanical
- h.w' h. fl.± I» vz.,J f'l°<~
0
..---
1. Toilet needs new tank kit. · If;I- .
2. Kitchen sink needs faucets replaced. • tJ 1L--- (} Jl,,
3. Water piping to laundry sink needs to be secured to wall or sink.
4. Furnace needs to be certified safe for operation by licensed mechanical contractor.
,/. r
,(s_ Furnace-vent pipe needs screws in pipe connectioµs. . OI---
r .
/ 6. Plastic dI}'er: vent pipe is not to code-must be ~laced. ·
-M• ~ ~ • ~
· 1. CPVC:pipe coming off water heater not to code; must be hard piped first 18" off water 11/-,
heater.
~oceJ/i IC -,;l.o- "t '7
oEORGEDOoo, DATE
BUILDING INSPECTOR
.,
~. I
/'715 SupE1<10Fl.. 1:)1-\:f £~1(.,1>4EE£1 i-1'1
( (
rf}((G,ll_EC,,010 j /YII , uJ£sr '733.- s-LI 43
~ WI\LL, 2.-3-CfS
\
2)(.8 .,_
A, T4)'f' iPF- A-tJCt~
I fJ s TA-1.:L ~~l t:>
3/4 1
'86'1.-T I 0
Woo:b
/f) ls.T
(31.,.,€X...ll f /J 6,
2rJ C) f
W et, D F1.-oc,fL J'9fS'i>
_, . . :,1·-. - '"
-----.Ex.,sr1rJ6i WA4..
cg.ow~ 11 IN Uf
-r2> 3 • APn
.W11~Lt> lj4I\ {'LI\T!='. Lf /+rJqLES t)LorJ"f
4 )(. <;. 11 To 'BciTOM WE. G, lJAU- ~r
ctiF ~~ t.,L'E..
WIT l+ 11?,AsE M f!)'JT ""G
'2... ~~ ~ \/~' 4> ·1R, I= It-.J Fop. c.e. WAL.\....•
13~,-s.
YT=P-IF'f fttJG.tLE. lEi-1',Tll
~~-'l~''~-- ~'.-;'.') ~ - >:/)
E> ·,
Afflrmatlvc Acl!on
6161724-6703 (
MUSKEGON (
Assessor
616/724-6708
Cemetery
6161724-6783
Clvll service West Michigan's Shoreline City
6161724-6716
Clerk
616/724-6705
BUILDING INSPECTION
C. N. Services
616/724-6717 1715 SUPERIOR
6-23-1998
Engineering
6161724-6707
Finance
I. Front porch requires footing
616172+6713 2. Front porch has missing siding and unprotected wood exposed to grade.
3. Handrail on stairs not installed correctly.
4. Garage overhead door broken with a section missing.
Fire Dept. 5. Siding missing on garage.
616/724-6792
6. Exterior lights not mounted in boxes.
7. Service panel not mounted securely to wall.
Income Tax 8. Feeders to garage not wired properly.
616/724-6770
9. Incandescent light fixture not permitted in front bedroom closet.
10. Chimney needs to be certified safe by licensed contractor.
Inspections
6\6/724-6715 This is the list that is remaining. The one item I did not insert in the list is the hardwired smoke detectors
we discussed on the phone. When the smoke detectors are completed and brought up to the codes'
minimum requirements, we will issue a temporary occupancy for another 30 days. The thirty days will
Leisure Service begin upon the date of issuance for the temporary occupancy. At the end of the extended time, another
616/724-6704
inspection will be made to make sure all items on the list are complete.
Manager's Office
616172<·6724 Jerry McIntyre
Planning/Zoning
616/724-6702
Police Dept.
616/724-6750
Publlc Works
616/726-4786
Treasurer
6161724-6720
Waler Dept.
616/724-6718
City of Muskegon, 933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 536, Muskegon, Michigan 49443-0536
Date: June 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From: Engineering
RE: MOU / Agreement with MOOT for the Construction of
Shoreline Dr. East
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Enter into an agreements with Michigan Department of Transportation to provide funding
for the proposed Shoreline Dr. East Project. Furthermore, due to the timing constrains, it
is requested that your approval, if granted, be contingent upon compliance with the City
attorney's review. Also, it is respectfully requested that the Mayor & City Clerk be
authorize to execute said agreements and the necessary resolutions .
•
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The estimated cost of the project, including the existing section of Shoreline Dr. from Terrace
to Southern Ave. is $11,850,000 of which the City is responsible for an estimated total of
$650,000.
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None at this time. The city's share would come out of Major Street Fund ($500,000),
Sewer Fund ($75,000) and Water Fund ($75,000).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conditional approval of the attached agreements and resolution.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
2002-72(f)
Revised 06/05/02
ROADWAY JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER
CITY OF MUSKEGON AND
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
(MOU)
WHEREAS, The City of Muskegon (the City) and the Michigan Department of
Transportation (MDOT), are jointly developing these roadway
jurisdictional transfers; and
WHEREAS, the City has jurisdiction over Shoreline Drive from Southern
Avenue to Terrace Street; and
WHEREAS, The City shall construct a new segment of Shoreline Drive
(Shoreline Dr. Extension) from Terrace Street to Business US
31 (US-31BR), as well as reconstruct and/or rehabilitate the
existing segment between Southern Avenue and Terrace Street
(see attached map); and
WHEREAS, US-31BR, from south of Ninth Street to north of Eastern
Street, are a pair of one-way State Trunkl i nes under the
jurisdiction of MDOT; and
WHEREAS, the City and MDOT will exchange jurisdiction of the
aforementioned streets upon completion and acceptance of
construction, reconstruction, and/or rehabilitation of
Shoreline Drive, as described above, and per the conditions
described in this MOU.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and MDOT agree as follows:
1. The City shall acquire the necessary property at its expense, and complete environmental
mitigation as required by the Phase II Environmental Review and by federal and state
regulations, and obtain MDOT approval of the required environmental clearance issues,
prior to and during constrnction. If additional costs are incurred during project construction,
for either the Shoreline Drive Extension or the existing Shoreline Drive roadway, due to
hazardous contaminated material disposal and/or other environmental issues, the City is
required to pay 100% of the additional excavation costs, beyond that which would normally
be classified as normal non-hazardous and/or non-hazardous contaminated material
excavation, as it relates to all disposal, handling and mitigation for the Shoreline Drive
Extension, as described above and on the attached map.
2. The City shall arrange for completion of design plans, engineering, and construction
including construction engineering (CE) of the Shoreline Drive Extension as described
herein, upon MDOT review and approval of final design plans; the City shall advertise, let,
and award the project; MDOT also shall approve construction staging, in coordination with
other Muskegon area projects to minimize impacts on the users of the system. The City will
be reimbursed for construction costs for the project through the transfer of state Build
Michigan III funds to the City; specific terms and conditions of the fund transfer shall be
addressed by separate agreement between the City and MDOT. The following items shall
be the respective responsibilities of the City and MDOT:
3. MDOT shall provide Build Michigan III funds not to exceed $11,850,000 for the
following predetermined, eligible items within the limits of the
Shoreline Drive Extension project and the reconstruction and
rehabilitation of the existng section between Terrace Street
and existing US-31BR (Southern Avenue): roadway construction,
roadway reconstruction, roadway rehabilitation, PE for the
portion of existing Shoreline Drive, CE, railroad relocation,
standard traffic signals, street-lighting replacement, public
utility pole relocation, relocation of existing public
utility service (as per MOOT guidelines for utility
relocations), with the following exceptions as listed in
Items 2b, 2c, and 8 below;
2. The City shall provide the following items, including required audits, related to the
Shoreline Drive at its expense: street-lighting operations and maintenance,
including utility billings; all sanitary force-main modifications and/or upgrades
resulting from existing condition defects; non-motorized trail construction and all
future maintenance; expansion and upgrades of existing utility service beyond
existing facilities unless replaced as a direct conflict to the new construction (all cost
associated with replacement of existing utilities, due to age of the facility, will be
shared evenly by MDOT and the City and all upgrades to replaced utilities will be
at I 00% city cost); and design engineering and environmental clearance per
previous agreements, including mitigation and cleanup of any additional
environmental issues discovered during the life of the construction project. MDOT
shall have no responsibility for sanitary sewer force-main and its existing condition.
The City shall be responsible for all needed sanitary sewer upgrades, and to assure
its structural integrity for the Shoreline Drive Extension.
3. Local road (snch as Western Avenue) modifications, outside the agreed on limits of
direct tie-ins to the Shoreline Drive, shall be the responsibility of the City.
4. The City shall be responsible for the design of the reconstruction pro j e ct ( as
approved by MOOT) on existing Shoreline Drive, from Fourth
Street to Terrace Street. In addition, the City shall be
responsible for the design of the rehabilitation project (as
approved by MOOT) on existing Shoreline Drive, from existing
US-31BR (north of Southern Avenue) to Fourth Street. The two
segments mentioned in this section shall be done separately
from the Shoreline Drive Extension construction project, but
shall also be included in the Build Michigan III funding,
with MOOT approval. This portion of the Build Michigan III
funding will be part of the total funding limit mentioned in
section "a" and any additional costs for these projects will
be at 100% City of Muskegon costs - per agreement).
3. The City shall obtain MDOT approval of final design plans and environmental mitigation
plans prior to contract letting for construction, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of the
Shoreline Drive project. The City will arrange for advertising, letting, CE, construction of
the Shoreline Drive, designing, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of the existing Shoreline
Drive from Terrace Street to Southern Avenue, and will be reimbursed with Build Michigan
III funds, per Item #2a above.
4. Upon the completion of the Shoreline Drive Extension as described herein, and upon
completion of existing Shoreline Drive improvements as described in Item #2 above, and
acceptance of these projects by MDOT, the City will transfer jurisdictional control of
Shoreline Drive, from south of Ninth Street to north of Eastern Avenue (MP to be assigned),
to MDOT to be a State Trunkline, designated as a segment of the US 31BR.
5. The City shall, as long as the contract is in place for such procedures, perform trunkline
highway maintenance of Shoreline Drive, for which jurisdictional control has been
transferred to MDOT by this MOU, and receive reimbursement from the State for such
maintenance in accordance with the duration, terms, and conditions of its
existing Municipal Trunkline Maintenance contract, and in
accordance with any future Municipal Trunkline Maintenance Contract
as renewed and agreed upon by the City and MDOT.
6. MDOT arranged for rehabilitation, at its expense, of US 31 BR from near Southern Avenue
to north US 31 during 1999. MDOT also made repairs on southbound US- 3 !BR at Spring
Street and on northbound US 3 !BR between Eighth and Ninth Streets; this project was
completed and accepted by MDOT in 1999, per contract 61153 / 45782.
7. Upon completion of the Shoreline Drive Extension and reconstruction/rehabilitation of
existing Shoreline Drive as described herein, MDOT will transfer jurisdiction of US-3 lBR,
which includes the one-way pair of Webster Avenue and Muskegon Avenue, from south
of Ninth Street to north of Eastern Avenue (MP: NB: South Spring Point of Ninth Street
North to North Spring Point of Eastern Street - CS 61151 BMP = 5.796 EMP = 6.066 and
CS 61153 BMP = 0.000 EMP 1.000; and SB: South Spring Point of Ninth Street North to
approximately 500 feet South of Eastern Street CS 61151 BMP = 5.796 EMP 6.066 and CS
61153 BMP = 0.000 EMP 0.860), to the City. Upon completion of the transfer, the City
shall have complete responsibility and authority over the referenced streets, including
maintenance responsibility for these streets. MDOT will have no further maintenance
responsibilities or obligations for these referenced streets. Upon transfer, the streets will
become a part of the City's Street Plan and eligible for maintenance cost reimbursement
under Act 51. A separate turnback agreement will be initiated between the City and MDOT.
8. After the transfer of jurisdiction is completed, ROW transfer will take place and will
be done as an easement for highway purposes. This process will be initiated by
MDOT and the City of Muskegon at a later date.
9. MDOT will not own the ROW for existing Shoreline Drive or the Shoreline Drive
Extension. As such, the City, not MDOT will be liable and responsible for all
environmental and other issues related to all Shoreline Drive ROW. In the event
MDOT is the fee owner of Muskegon and Webster, it shall convey ownership to the
City. The respective environmental liabilities shall be governed by the laws of the
State.
10. Liability and responsibility for the condition of the highway and streets under
MCLA 691.1402 and the Liability Exemption Section of Part 201, ACT 451
(Section 20126) shall follow the transfers of jurisdiction, regardless of fee
ownership. No liability under the highway execption to governmental immunity
evidenced by that statute or any successor or amendment thereof shall remain with
either party after jurisdiction has been transferred as set forth in this agreement.
8. Existing traffic and parking controls, including speed limits, parking regulations, truck
restrictions, traffic signs and signals, and pavement markings (on the street segments
defined, for which jurisdictional control has been transferred to MDOT by this MOU), will
be retained by MDOT after the transfer, so long as traffic operations are not negatively
affected. Any future changes to the existing traffic controls, or placement of new controls
or devices, and maintenance on these transferred streets within the City, will be done in
consultation with the City, per existing MDOT procedures, policies, and agreements for
trunkline routes within the City.
a MDOT will participate in the cost of traffic signals which meet MDOT's current
standards and as provided in the current signal maintenance agreements. Additional
costs to provide decorative traffic signals shall be 100% paid by the City of
Muskegon. The City of Muskegon will also be responsible for providing all
replacement parts required for any and all decorative traffic signals, within this
Shoreline Drive corridor.
2. MDOT will not participate in the cost of placing new business informational or
advertising signs as part of the Shoreline Drive Extension or existing roadway
projects as described herein. If any existing signs are required to be moved, they
will be moved by the City and shall be paid for by the City.
9. The transferred street segments as described herein, for which jurisdictional control has been
transferred to MDOT by this MOU, will operate as existing state trunklines in all respects,
per existing MDOT procedures, policies, and agreements for trunkline routes within the
City.
10. In accordance with MDOT's guidelines for public participation in
planning such projects, MDOT and the City will jointly provide
opportunities for public input and involvement before implementing
any future major improvement projects on the street segments
described herein, for which jurisdictional control has been
transferred to MDOT by this MOU.
Include map and/or attachment that shows turnback limits, stationing,
and description.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Memorandum of
Understanding to be executed on this 11th day of .June , 2002.
WITNESSES: CITY OF MUSKEGON:
Mayor
. ~Q-
Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk
WITNESSES: STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION:
By:
Its:
JMS - 0: (STREETSWAP)
RESOLUTION 2002-72(f)
RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF MUSKEGON FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SHORELINE DR. EAST FROM US-31 BR TO THE EXISTING SHORELINE
DR. , THE MILLING AND RESURFACING OF SHOREl,.INE DR. FROM US-31 BR NORTHERLY TO
FOURTH STREET & THE RECONSTRUCTION OF SHORELINE DR. FROM FOURTH TO
TERRACE TOGETHER WITH NECESSARY RELATED WORK AND AUTHORIZATION FOR
MAYOR STEPHEN J. WARMINGTON AND CITY CLERK GAIL A KUNDINGER TO EXECUTE SAID
CONTRACT
_Moved by Commissioner Larson and supported by
Commissioner_--=B=u=ie"'--_ _ _ _ _ _ _that the following Resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, entry by the City of Muskegon into .Contract no. 02-5019 between the Michigan
Department of Transportation and the City of Muskegon for the resurfacing & widening of the
southbound exit ramp at US-31 and Sherman Blvd. within the City is in the best interests of the City of
Muskegon.
RESOLVED, that entry by the City into Contract Agreement Number 02-5019 be and the same is
hereby authorized and approved and the Mayor and Clerk are authorized to execute said contract for
and on behalf of the City of Muskegon.
Adopted this 11th day of June , 2002.
CERTIFICATION
This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on
.,June 11 , 2002. The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open
Meetings Act of the State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
STATE OF MICHIGAN
JOHN ENGLER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREGORY J. ROSINE
GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR
July 24, 2002
Ms. Gail Kundinger, Clerk
AfCf/Vfo
City of Muskegon Sf p 0 5 2002
933 Terrace Street, P.O. Box 53q
Muskegon, MI 49443-0536
City clerks O .
. ffice
Dear Ms. Kundinger:
RE: MDOT Contract Number: 02-5019
Control Section: MBS 61153; MBS 61151
Job Number: 56028; 59581
Enclosed is a fully executed copy of the above noted agreement.
Sincerely,
·iJee--~ ~UAcJ_,,
Jackie Burch
Contract Processing Specialist
Design Division
Enclosure
cc: V. Weerstra, Grand Region and A. Suber, Economic Development
A. Christensen, Financial Operations Division
Grand Region Engineer ·
MURRAY D. VAN WAGONER BUILDING • P.O. BOX 30050 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909
www.michigan.gov • (5 17) 373-2090
LH-LAN-0(11/01)
{_') ..~)
.•"
I ! ,,,' '/"·_r'
i ., . ,-~
L~~;l~~;t~ -
RESOLUTION 2002- 72(f)
RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AGREEMENT BE1WEEN THE MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF MUSKEGON FOR THE CONSTRTUCTION OF
SHORELINE DRIVE EAST FROM US-31 BR TO THE EXISTING SHORELINE DRIVE, FOR THE MILLING &
RESURFACING OF SHORELINE DRIVE FROM US31-BR NORTHERLY TO FOURTH STREET AND THE
RECONSTRUCTION OF SHORELINE DRIVE FROM FOURTH TO TERRACE TOGETHER WITH
NECESSARY RELATED WORK AND AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR STEPHEN J. WARMINGTON AND
CITY CLERK GAIL A KUNDINGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT
Moved by Commissioner Larson and supported by
Commissioner_~B~u~ie_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _that the following Resolution be adopted:
WHEREAS, entry by the City of Muskegon into Contract no.2002-0672 between the Michigan Department of
Transportation and the City of Muskegon for the purpose of exchanging jurisdictions of certain streets to
accommodate new US-31 BR. within the City is in the best interests of the City of Muskegon.
RESOLVED, that entry by the City into Contract Agreement Number 2002-0672 be and the same is hereby
authorized and approved and the Mayor and Clerk are authorized to execute said contract for and on behalf of
the City of Muskegon.
Adopted this 11th day of ,Jqne , 2002.
ATTEST ~LO., iv,cL,r,o ,.,0
Gail A Kundinger, City Clerk O
CERTIFICATION
This resolution was adopted at a meeting of the City Commission, held on June 11 , 2002.
The meeting was properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the State of
Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
By
d
Uu J ,
- Q,.__ "K!
J /
. .w,.cLv'Cjc2.,,0
· Gail A. Kundinger, Clerk .. ( .
AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ __
CITY COMMISSION MEETING 6/11/02
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
FROM: Bryon L. Mazade, City Manager
DATE: June 11, 2002
RE: Traffic Signal Support Pole Painting
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
To approve the painting of 32 traffic signal support poles in the downtown area utilizing
Consumers Energy's contract with Pennington Bros. (Twin Lake, Ml). These poles are in need
of painting and doing so will accomplish another component of the Blight Fight effort.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
32 poles@ $354.00 each $11,328.00
40 brackets @ $40.00 each - 1,600.00
TOTAL: $12,928.00
BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the request.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
None.
JMS • O: (TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE PAINTING)
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
2002-72(h)
CITY OF MUSKEGON - BRYON L. MAZADE
Effective July 1, 2002
This employment agreement is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF
MUSKEGON ("CITY") and BRYON L. MAZADE ("MANAGER").
Recitals
A The CITY desires to employ the services of MANAGER as the City Manager of
the City of Muskegon as provided in the Charter of the City of Muskegon and desires to establish
conditions of employment, provide certain benefits and set working conditions for said
MANAGER.
B. MANAGER desires to maintain the employment as City Manager of the City of
Muskegon in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Agreement.
C. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements.
Agreement
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY AND MANAGER AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. EMPLOYMENT. CITY employs MANAGER as City Manager to perform the
functions and duties specified in the City Charter and ordinances and to perform such other
legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Commission may, from time to
time, assign, and MANAGER accepts such employment.
MANAGER agrees to remain in the employ of the CITY until termination is
effected as hereinafter provided. MANAGER agrees to devote full time to his duties as City
Manager. MANAGER may undertake other incidental employment, subject to the right of the
City to require Manager to terminate other incidental employment.
C:\DOCUME-1\KUNDIN-1\LOCALS-1\Temp\AA5067.DOC
I
2. SALARY. Effective July 1, 2002, CITY agrees to pay MANAGER as
compensation for services rendered an annual salary of$105,256 per year. MANAGER shall be
entitled to cost ofliving adjustments approved by the City Commission for department heads on
the first of each year.
3. PENSION. It is understood by MANAGER that he will remain a member of the
City's General Employees Retirement System and remain eligible for all benefits thereunder.
4. FRINGE BENEFITS. In addition to the base salary and deferred compensation
established for MANAGER, CITY shall afford MANAGER the following:
(a) Sick Leave. The existing sick leave bank shall be continued, and shall
continue to accrue at one (1) day per month, up to a maximum of 120 days.
(b) Disability Insurance. During employment, a disability insurance policy
providing benefits for lost compensation until age sixty-five (65).
(c) Holidays. Eleven (11) holidays per annum.
(d) Vacation. Effective January 1, 2002; for each calendar year MANAGER
shall be entitled to five weeks vacation. Vacation time may be accumulated and carried over to
subsequent years, except that vacation time in excess of four weeks shall not be carried over and
shall be lost.
(e) Life Insurance. A term life insurance policy during employment in the
amount provided for exempt employees ..·
(f) Automobile Allowance.. Effective July 1, 2002, an annual automobile
allowance of $6,000 for mileage shall be provided and payable in the 26 pay periods. In
addition, there shall be reimbursement for mileage at the standard City rate for a round trip of
100 miles or more on behalf of the CITY.
C:\DOCUME-1\KUNDIN~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\AA5067.DOC
2
(g) Hospitalization Insurance. Coverage under the CITY'S hospitalization and
dental plan for MANAGER, MANAGER'S wife and children. MANAGER and MANAGER'S
dependents will, however, be subject to plan amendments adopted from time to time by the City
Commission.
(h) Membership Dues and Expenses. Payment of annual ICMA membership
dues and payment of expenses to attend ICMA conferences within the State of Michigan.
Payment of the expenses to attend the annual ICMA conference. All other out of state
conferences must receive prior consent of City Cominission.
(i) Civic Organizations. CITY will pay or reimburse MANAGER for
membership dues and fees in one civic organizations, i.e. Rotary, Lions Club, etc., subject to the
City's ability to review and eliminate this benefit.
G) Miscellaneous. In addition to the fringe benefits set forth above, and to
the extent that this subparagraph does not duplicate or conflict with the above fringe benefits,
(which shall prevail), the MANAGER shall have the same fringe benefits as are available to the
highest level department heads employed by the CITY from time to time.
5. TERM. It is understood by both CITY and MANAGER that employment may be
terminated at the will of either party.
6. SEVERANCE PAY UPON TERMINATION BY CITY. If CITY terminates
MANAGER'S employment, of if termination occurs pursuant to section 8 (except the last
paragraph thereof), MANAGER shall receive severance pay in an amount equal to six (6)
months' salary, 50% of any unused sick leave pay and payment for unused vacation time earned
in that calendar year to the date of termination.
C:\DOCUME~1\KUNDIN~1\LOCALS-1\Temp\AA5067.DOC
'
.)
7. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BY MANAGER. MANAGER may
terminate employment at any time after providing the CITY with a thirty (30) day notice.
8. SEVERANCE PAY UPON TERMINATION BY MANAGER. In the event the
CITY refuses, following written notice, to comply with any material provisions of this agreement
which financially benefit MANAGER, or MANAGER resigns following the simultaneous
suggestion, whether formal or informal, by a majority of the members of the City Commission
that he resign, then, in that event, the MANAGER may at his option be deemed to be terminated
at the date of such failure to comply or simultaneous suggestion. In such case, the MANAGER
shall be deemed to have been terminated by the CITY and entitled to the severance benefits set
forth above.
In the event the MANAGER terminates his employment for reasons other than
those stated in this paragraph, he shall receive one-half (1/2) of his unused sick leave bank and
all earned vacation pay for that calendar year, but no other severance pay or benefit, except as
required by law.
9. MERGER OF NEGOTIATIONS. This agreement constitutes the entire contract
of employment between CITY and MANAGER. No statement, promise, agreement, or
obligation that conflicts with the terms of this agreement shall modify, enlarge, or invalidate this
agreement or any provisions hereof
C:\DOCUME~1\KUNDIN~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\AA5067.DOC
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY and MANAGER have executed this agreement this
/U day of .Ju /7 e , 2002.
WITNESS SES:
C:IDOCUME~1\KUNDIN~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\AA5067.DOC
5
Sign up for City of Muskegon Emails