View the PDF version Google Docs PDF Viewer
LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, May 28, 2025
5:30 P.M.
Conference Room 204
MUSKEGON CITY HALL
933 TERRACE STREET
MUSKEGON, MI 49440
AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes for February 26, 2025
III. Old Business
IV. New Business
1) Climate Action Plan – Peter Wills
Climate Action Plan Documents
2) Social Media Policy – Deborah Sweet
3) Water Policies Review – Sarah Wilson
4) Muskegon Social Equity Program – Mike Franzak
5) Legislative/ARPA Updates – Peter Wills
6) Emergency Response Plan – Peter Wills
City-Specific Support Emergency Operations Plan
Muskegon County Hazard Mitigation Plan FINAL
7) South Breakwater Lighthouse Update – Peter Wills
8) Pensions – Jonathan Seyferth
V. Public Comment
Adjourn
CITY OF MUSKEGON
LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE
Minutes
Wednesday, February 26, 2025
5:30 pm
Present: Mayor Johnson, Vice Mayor St.Clair, Commissioners Kochin, Kilgo, Keener, German,
and Gorman
Absent: None
Approval of Minutes
Vice Mayor St.Clair moved, Commissioner Kilgo seconded, to approve the minutes of
December 2, 2024.
MOTION CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS
Update on Water Affordability Study by Prein & Newhof
Department of Public Works Director, Dan VanderHeide, and Barbara Marczak, Ernie Sarkipato
and Nicole Dyer from Prein & Newhof presented information on the state of the water fund,
expected future water costs, and an update on the affordability study. Four program funding
scenarios were explained.
Commissioner German was contacted by a 90 year old whose bill was $500, no leaks were
found by her plumber. She was told she must pay the bill. Mayor explained how this was being
handled. The City will repay if the error is on the City’s end.
Vice Mayor St.Clair believes the City can do better than MMCAA, local admin preferred. It was
suggested that delinquency be increased to $100. She would like to see a policy change to
incorporate an appeals process when there is a metering dispute.
Commissioner Gorman stated we have many low-income residents, $500 bill could create
homelessness. An appeals process is needed. Would rate increases impact wholesalers?
Director VanderHeide stated yes, commodity charges do impact, except WMRWA.
Commissioner Kilgo prefers scenario A. Additional rate increases are a hard sell to residents. If
state plan passes, what happens to a local program? Director Pete Wills indicated the state
program would allow for local programs.
Commissioner Kilgo has concerns about payment plans, these often lead to more problems if
they are too long.
Commissioner Kochin has had good experience with Consumer’s flat rate billing for elderly and
income constrained. Supports a policy on shutoffs, investigations and appeals. Prefers Option
A, no rate increases. Feels reducing number of shutoffs is important.
Commissioner Keener would like the online credit card fee waived, and the $2 look-up fee for
paying in person without the paper copy of the bill.
Mayor Johnson asked why only residential rates were used to estimate cost of program options.
It was explained that case law appears to indicate that funding source of the program must be
those that benefit from the program. Suggested we consider offering affordability to small
businesses. Would like something more than Option A, but does not want something
complicated. Maybe something like Option B to create a fund, but prefers no rate increases.
It was asked if there is an excessive use/high bill alert. BS&A does have something and
Treasurer’s Office does contact people.
2025 Legislative Policy Meeting Calendar
To set the meeting dates for the Legislative Policy Committee for 2025.
For 2025 the meeting dates are:
February 26, 2025
May 28, 2025
August 27, 2025 (move to August 20)
November 26, 2025 (move to November 19)
August 27 is the date being considered for an unrelated event involving the Mayor and Manager.
November 26 is the Wednesday before Thanksgiving and this date could be rescheduled.
Discussion was held on the August and November dates. It was suggested that August 19 and
December 1 would work for everyone.
Vice Mayor St.Clair moved, Commissioner Kilgo seconded, to set the dates for the 2025
Legislative Policy Meetings as May 28, August 19, and December 1.
MOTION CARRIED
Legislative/ARPA Updates
Director of Government Relations and Strategic Operations, Pete Wills, gave an update on
ARPA Community Grants. Climate Action – contract signed with Fresh Coast Climate
Solutions. A draft of the CAP will be brought to Commission on April 22nd. Discussion was
held on the Governor’s road funding plan, House Resolution 19, and adult-use marijuana
payments. Earned Sick Time Act Legislation went into effect Friday, February 21st, but changed
Thursday. We may need a policy change on how we cash out sick time. Nelson School
Apartments were discussed.
$2.8 Million State Appropriation
City Manager Jonathan Seyferth explained that several years ago, our state legislators
appropriated $2.8million (in two buckets) for improvements at the Third Street wharf. Staff
recommends that we begin spending that money soon. The $2.8 million was appropriated to
help move forward the initial conversations about a Fisherman’s Landing and Third Street Wharf
swap. Those conversations did not come to fruition, and about 25% of the dollars have been
sitting in our coffers waiting to be used. The City cannot request the additional appropriations
until we start spending the dollars we already have.
Staff recommends that we begin spending these dollars on engineering and planning related to
improvements at Third Street Wharf and a road grid north of Shoreline Drive in that same area
(as discussed in our recent public engagements).
It may seem premature to start spending these dollars before any agreement with Mart Dock is
finalized. However, the state has begun to look at previously appropriated dollars that have not
been spent to reappropriate those funds to complete other state priorities. If we are actively
spending the dollars, we believe it will lessen the chance of the state reappropriating those
dollars (this is not a guarantee). Although no specific timeline has been given, we believe that
within the second quarter of 2025 (April – June), the state will begin looking at these unspent
dollars
It should be noted that the enabling legislating notes the dollars are for a wharf project in
Muskegon, and the legislative summary specifically calls out Third Street. This boxes us in a bit
on how the dollars could be used (i.e., we could not use the funds to purchase the Verplank
Property, for example).
It was discussed to concentrate on an agreement and bring it back to Commission.
Commission Meeting Attendance
Vice Mayor St.Clair explained the importance of consistent attendance at Commission Meetings.
Regular participation is essential for informed decision-making, productive discussions, and the
overall effectiveness of our work. To ensure clarity and accountability, perhaps we should
consider adding formal attendance expectations to our guidelines of conduct. This will help
reinforce our shared commitment to fulfilling our responsibilities. We have a Code of Conduct
but it does not reference attendance. There is a 1983 Commission Attendance Policy but it is
very vague.
Deputy City Manager LeighAnn Mikesell and City Clerk Ann Meisch are working on a new
Handbook and there is an attendance policy in there.
Vice Mayor St.Clair, Commissioner German and Commissioner Gorman will work with staff
and bring a draft policy back to the Legislative Policy Committee Meeting for review.
Ownership of L-Dock
City Manager Jonathan Seyferth discussed with Commission if the City should own the L Dock,
which is tentatively approved for Hartshorn Marina as part of Adelaide Pointe’s in-out boat
operation.
Per the shared use agreement, Adelaide Pointe is allowed to use the forklift drops at Hartshorn
Marina for in-out boat operations. This includes using two finger docks and an L dock (so
named because of its shape). The City has debated the idea of owning the L Dock which would
provide us more control over its use.
Event Food Vendors on Western
Commissioner Gorman explained updating Event Regulations in the City of Muskegon
specifically regarding food vendors being placed in front of permanent restaurant businesses on
Western Avenue. Discussion was held on potential options for zones along Western Avenue
more appropriate so as not to create direct competition from food vendors and restaurant
businesses. It was discussed to have food trucks on Third Street.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Public comments were received.
Adjournment
Commissioner Keener moved, Commissioner Gorman seconded, to adjourn the meeting at
8:40 pm.
MOTION CARRIED
______________________________
Ann Marie Meisch, MMC
City Clerk
Agenda Item Review Form
Muskegon City Commission – Legislative Policy Committee
LPC Meeting Date: 5/28/25 Title: Social Media Policy and Guidelines
Submitted By: Deborah Santiago-Sweet Department: Manager’s Office
Brief Summary: Staff recommends the approval of the attached Social Media Use Policy and
Guidelines.
Detailed Summary & Background:
To address the evolving landscape of online communication and ensure responsible, effective, and
consistent use of social media by the City of Muskegon, a comprehensive Social Media Use Policy and
Guidelines has been developed.
This Policy establishes protocols for social media use by City officials and employees, ensuring
communications are properly authorized, formatted, and legally compliant, particularly considering
rulings such as Lindke v. Freed, 601 U.S. 187 (2024).
Updates have been made to the policy to clarify language since the March 25, 2025, Commission
Meeting and can be seen highlighted in yellow. The city attorney’s will be present at LPC to answer legal
questions about the policy.
Goal/Focus Area/Action Item Addressed:
Amount Requested: N/A Budgeted Item: N/A
Fund(s) or Account(s): N/A Budget Amendment Needed: N/A
Recommended Motion: Discussion only.
Approvals: City and Deputy City Manager Guest(s) Invited / Presenting: Yes
SOCIAL MEDIA USE POLICY AND GUIDELINES
DATE: 05/13/2025
PURPOSE/OVERVIEW
This document outlines the Social Networking and Social Media Use Policy for the City of Muskegon (“the City”). In response to the
fast-evolving landscape of digital communication and the increasing role of social media in how residents access information and
engage with local government, this Policy establishes clear guidelines for the City’s presence and activity on social platforms.
The purpose of this Social Media Use Policy and Guidelines (“the Policy”) is to define standards for the responsible and effective use
of social media by City officials and employees. It ensures that all communications made on behalf of the City are authorized,
professional, legally compliant, and aligned with public expectations. This includes adherence to relevant court rulings—such as
Lindke v. Freed, 601 U.S. 187 (2024)—and compliance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations, including Michigan’s
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
SCOPE
This Policy applies to all social media use by or on behalf of the City of Muskegon, including but not limited to staff, elected officials,
appointed officials, committees, and departments. Employees of the Muskegon Police Department shall adhere to their department-
specific social media policies. In areas where those policies do not address Cityspecific issues, or for cross-departmental matters, this
City policy shall apply.
TYPES OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE
PERSONAL PAGES
All staff, elected officials, appointed officials and board and committee members may have personal social media sites. These sites
shall remain personal in nature and be used to share personal opinions or non-work-related information. Following this principle
helps ensure a distinction between sharing personal and City views. Personal pages shall not use City e-mail accounts or passwords
in conjunction with a personal social media site. Campaign social media sites fall under this category, however, if a campaign social
media page is converted/renamed into an elected official social media page it would be reclassified as an Elected Official Page.
The following guidance is for City employees who decide to have a personal social media account and who decide to comment on or
share posts about City business:
1. Use a disclaimer such as: “This is the personal (or campaign) page of [official/employee]” or “the views expressed are
strictly my own and do not reflect or represent the views of my employer.”
2. Employees shall not use or disclose any information, photographs, video, or other recording obtained or accessible as a
result of employment or appointment with the City without the express authorization of the City Manager and/or their
authorized designee.
3. Employees may share or repost City information, such as updates on leaf pickup, City events, public meetings, emergency
notices, and other relevant announcements, to help keep the community informed.
PROFESSIONAL PAGES
The City recognizes two types of professional social media accounts used for City-related communication: City-Controlled Pages and
Elected Official Pages. By law, both are considered tools for public engagement and must reflect the values, transparency, and
professionalism expected of public service. These pages are distinct from personal or campaign accounts.
City-Controlled Pages are social media accounts created, owned, and managed by the City. These accounts represent the City as a
whole, its departments, specific leadership positions, or specific initiatives, and are used to provide public information, communicate
City services, and promote community events.
All City-related communication through these social media pages shall remain professional in nature and should always be
conducted in accordance with this Policy and the City’s Community Engagement Handbook. All content must maintain neutrality,
and comply with legal standards for public communication, including accessibility, records retention, and privacy policies. All City-
Controlled pages must be registered as outlined below.
City-Controlled Pages shall not be used for political purposes, to conduct private transactions, or to engage in private business
activities. Inappropriate use of City-Controlled social media can be grounds for disciplinary action.
Only individuals authorized by the City may publish content to a City website or City social media account.
Page 1 of 5
Examples of these accounts include: City of Muskegon Government on Facebook, Muskegon City Parks & Recreation on Instagram,
and the Muskegon Farmers Market on Facebook.
Elected Official Pages are social media accounts created and managed by elected officials (e.g., Mayor, City Commissioners) in their
formal, public roles. Among other purposes, these accounts are used to share information and engage with the public on topics
related to their duties within the City.
Although Elected Official Pages are not subject to internal City oversight, elected officials are individually responsible for managing
these accounts in accordance with applicable laws. Content that involves the discussion or facilitation of City business may be
considered public record and subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the Open Meetings Act (OMA).
Improper use—such as blocking constituents, deleting comments based on viewpoint, or mixing political campaigning with public
duties—can create legal liability for both the official and the City.
Elected officials are encouraged to clearly distinguish these pages from personal or campaign pages, and to understand the legal
risks and responsibilities that come with using social media in an official capacity.
REGISTERED CITY PAGES
All City-Controlled social media sites shall be listed on one page on the City’s website. The link to that webpage is:
https://muskegon-mi.gov/social-media-accounts/
REGISTERING A NEW PAGE
All City-Controlled social media sites shall be (1) approved by the City Manager and/or designee, (2) published using approved social
networking platforms and tools, and (3) be administered by the approved staff member(s).
The City Manager and/or their designee, and the IT department, will be granted administrative access to all City-controlled social
media pages.
DEREGISTERING AN EXISTING PAGE
If a City-Controlled social media page is no longer of use, (1) notify the City Manager and/or designee. (2) Ensure records have been
archived according to City guidelines. (3) Set a timeline for deactivating the account. (4) Develop a farewell message to post on the
account that includes when the account will be closed and where followers can go for information in the future. (5) Consult with the
Community Engagement Manager to determine whether to protect the account name by keeping it active to prevent use of the
City’s name for improper purposes. If a decision is made to protect the account name, take all necessary action to do so. (6)
Unpublish or delete the page. (7) Update the list of official social media accounts listed online on https://muskegon-mi.gov/social-
media-accounts/.
Considerations for Deregistering:
Considerations for deciding whether to deregister a City social media account may include, but are not limited to:
• Merging an account into another City social media account.
• It is no longer needed to accomplish a department’s goals.
• It does not align with the City’s mission, vision, or values.
• It does not comply with these procedures.
• It is not currently being used or is being underutilized with no original posts for at least 60 days.
• It is not being monitored.
Page 2 of 5
OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT
City-Controlled social media outlets or participating in social media features on City websites shall maintain a high level of ethical
conduct and professional decorum. Failure to do so is grounds for revoking the privilege to participate in City social media sites or
other social media features.
Information shall be presented following professional standards for good grammar, spelling, brevity, clarity and accuracy, and avoid
jargon, obscure terminology, or acronyms. City-Controlled sites shall be clear and precise and follow industry best practices for
posting updates. All content posted to City-Controlled social media should be:
1. Relevant – Information that engages residents and pertains to their daily lives
2. Timely – Pertains to deadlines, upcoming events, or current news
3. Actionable – Prompts residents to take action
4. Informative – Posts should encourage residents to visit a specific City webpage for additional details, resources, or updates
related to the content shared.
Social media shall not be used to circumvent other City communication policies, including news media policy requirements. City
employees or elected officials shall not publish information on any social media sites that include:
1. Confidential information
2. Copyright violations
3. Profanity, racist, sexist, or derogatory content or comments
4. Partisan political views
5. Commercial endorsements or SPAM
Time of Use: City-Controlled social media accounts are not monitored 24/7, and as such, posts and responses should not be
immediately expected. Accounts are traditionally monitored during normal business hours, designated as Monday-Thursday from
7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., excluding holidays.
COMMENT AND PRIVATE MESSAGE GUIDELINES
City-controlled pages shall decide and be consistent with their commenting and private message guidelines. Whether comments or
private messages are allowed or not, the pages shall remain consistent.
If comments are turned off on one post, they shall always be turned off on all posts when possible. Acknowledging that the
“comment off function” is manual, and happens after the post is made, there is potential for a comment or two to be posted before
the comment function is turned off. If that happens and a few comments are made, continue to turn the comments off and
comment as the page to notify of the comment guidelines outlined in this policy. If the comment function is accidently not turned
off and many comments are made, leave the commenting feature on for that post.
City-Controlled pages that allow comments may reply to comments or questions as long as it’s following archiving rules and this
policy. It’s encouraged that comments link back to information on an official City website. Refer to the “Moderation of Third-Party
Content” section for commenting removal guidelines.
SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT AUDITS
Annual audits of City-Controlled account activity and the effectiveness of the content being posted will be performed by the
Community Engagement Manager in collaboration with the staff managing the page(s).
The Department Director, or their designee, should confirm that City social media content moderation is regularly occurring to
ensure that sites are active, that content is engaging, and that content posted in violation of this policy is handled appropriately.
For purposes of this policy, “active” refers to a page having been posted to at least once weekly; and “engaging” refers to views,
reach, and interaction with the posts.
Page 3 of 5
RETENTION
Social media sites are subject to local, state, and federal laws, including Michigan’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Any content
produced or maintained on social media sites, including communication posted by the City and communication received from
citizens, is a public record.
The Information Technology Department shall preserve records under the relevant records retention schedule in a format that
preserves the integrity of the original record and is easily producible. Furthermore, the retention of social media records shall fulfill
the following requirements:
1. Social media records are captured in a continuous, automated fashion throughout the day to minimize the potential loss of
data due to deletion and/or changes on the social networking site.
2. Social media records are maintained in an authentic format (i.e. ideally the native technical format provided by the social
network, such as XML or JSON) along with complete metadata.
3. Social media records are archived in a system that preserves the context of communications, including conversation threads
and rich media, to ensure completeness and availability of relevant information when records are accessed.
4. Social media records are indexed based on specific criteria such as date, content type, and keywords to ensure that records
can be quickly located and produced in an appropriate format for distribution (e.g. PDF).
5. Each employee who administers one or more social networking sites on behalf of the City has self-service, read-only access
to search and produce relevant social media records to fulfill public information and legal discovery requests as needed.
The City utilizes an automated archiving solution for all City-controlled social media sites to comply with applicable public records
law and fulfill the above record retention requirements. The City’s archive is available through the Information Technology
Department.
Page 4 of 5
EXTERNAL POLICY
The following guidelines shall be displayed to users on all social media sites or made available on the City’s website and be linked on
social media pages.
Time of Use: City-controlled social media accounts are not monitored 24/7, and as such, posts and responses should not be
immediately expected. Accounts are traditionally monitored during normal business hours, designated as Monday-Thursday from
7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., excluding holidays.
MODERATION OF THIRD-PARTY CONTENT
City-controlled social media sites serve as a limited public forum and all content published is subject to monitoring. The City-
Controlled social media platforms are intended primarily for one-way communication of City information. Two-way communication
should be discouraged where possible.
Social media is not to be used for emergency communications with the City, such as reporting crimes or hazardous conditions. Such
reports shall be made through designated official channels such as 911.
Under no circumstance should users be blocked from City-Controlled social media accounts. If suspicious activity is noted, staff
should report it directly to the social media platform.
User-generated posts (comments) will be rejected or removed (if possible) when the content:
1. Contains obscenity or material that appeals to the prurient interest
2. Contains personal identifying information or sensitive personal information
3. Is threatening, harassing, defamatory, fraudulent, or discriminatory
4. Incites or promotes violence or illegal activities
5. Contains information that reasonably could compromise individual or public safety
6. False or misleading commercial speech or spam
PUBLIC RECORDS LAW
Social media sites are subject to applicable public records laws. Any content maintained in a social media format related to City
business, including communication posted by the City and communication received from citizens, is a public record. The Department
maintaining the site is responsible for responding completely and accurately to any public records request for social media content.
Document edit notes
Action Person Date Change
New Deborah Sweet 4/10/25 New policy
Page 5 of 5
Agenda Item Review Form
Muskegon City Commission – Legislative Policy Committee
LPC Meeting Date: 5/28/2025 Title: Water/Sewer Policy Review
Submitted By: Sarah Wilson Department: Treasurer
Brief Summary: Review of water/sewer policies and procedures.
Detailed Summary & Background:
At the last Legislative Policy Committee meeting, there were questions regarding the policies and
procedures in the Treasurer’s Office related to water and sewer billing. The processes carried out by the
Treasurer’s Office are done to comply with the documents attached, which include the related City
Ordinances, the City’s Financial Policies document, and Resolution No. 95-030. We can discuss the
processes related to water billing, water shut offs and placing of liens on tax bills, and look at any
changes the City Commission and/or staff would like to see.
Goal/Focus Area/Action Item Addressed: Financial Infrastructure
Amount Requested: N/A Budgeted Item: N/A
Fund(s) or Account(s): N/A Budget Amendment Needed: N/A
Recommended Motion: Discussion only.
Approvals: N/A Guest(s) Invited / Presenting: None
XX/V. WATER AND SEWER POLICIES
CHARGES FOR LATE PAYMENTS
Bills not paid by the due date shall be subject to a service charge equal to ten (10%) percent of
the billing. In the event a delinquent bill must be spread on the taxes, for the purpose of covering
associated administrative costs, an additional service charge equal to twenty (20%) percent with a
minimum service charge of $25.00 and a maximum service charge of $100.00 of the original
delinquent billing amount shall be charged.
ADJUSTMENT OF BILLS FOR MAJOR LEAKS
RESIDENTIAL WATER/SEWER LEAK ADJUSTMENT REGUALTIONS
The purpose of these regulations is to promote water conservation by encouraging customers to
promptly fix leaks and plumbing problems and to establish guidelines that provide fair and
consistent treatment of customers requesting leak adjustments.
TYPES OF ADJUSTMENTS
1) Adjustments for leaks where water was discharged into the sanitary sewer
system.
2) Adjustments for leaks where water was not discharged into the sanitary sewer
system.
RULES
No more than one leak adjustment will be allowed in any two year (24 month) period.
No more than two consecutive billing periods will be adjusted.
The request must be made within 30 days of the due date for the period initially involved and must
be accompanied by the following:
• A written statement from the customer describing the nature of the problem, the
date repairs were completed, and copies of the paid receipts for services and/or
supplies (where applicable).
• Current readings (at the time of the request) from both the meter and remote
device to be furnished by customer.
Leak adjustments will be based on metered usage experience after repairs are made and will be
made only if usage is demonstrably reduced (after adjusting for any extenuating circumstances).
If lost water entered the sanitary sewer system, leak adjustments to the customer's water and
sewer billing will equal 25% of the estimated loss for no more than two billing periods.
If the lost water did not enter the sanitary sewer system (i.e. leaks in crawl spaces or into the
ground) water charges will be adjusted 25% of the estimated loss for no more than two billing
periods and sewer charges will be adjusted to normal usage based on prior year's usage patterns.
If a leak is suspected but cannot be detected by the occupant or owner, additional assistance may
be requested from the Water Maintenance Department at no charge to the customer.
SHUTOFF PRACTICES
While the City is authorized to shut off water service for any delinquent bill, the City will normally
shut off water or sewer service if the charges to the premises or the meter in question are
delinquent in the amount of $50.00 or more. This amount and practice shall vary, and the
threshold amount for shutoff may be changed by the decision of the City Manager, from time to
time, to an amount less or more than $50.00. This decision shall be made by the City Manager
based on the administrative and enforcement availability and capability of City personnel, and the
cost incurred by the City by using this method of enforcement.
BILLING INITIATION AND SERVICE CHANGES
Because state law dictates that a municipality that provides municipal water and sewer service to
a property shall have a lien against the premises, the City requires that the legal property owner
sign on for water and/or or sewer billing service and sign off for water and/or sewer service. The
owner must approve any billing changes by signing an application for service form located at the
Treasurer's Office/Water Billing Department. Positive identification is required to be provided.
BILLING CYCLES
For the purpose of reading water meters and billing customers, the city is divided into districts.
The meters for each district are read monthly and the customer accounts are also billed each
month with bills being due at least 15 days after the billing date.
E-BILLING
City water and sewer customers can sign up to receive their monthly bill in paperless format via
the internet. Customers that agree to receive their monthly water and sewer bill via the internet
help save paper, printing and postage costs and also receive a credit on their monthly bill.
AUTOMATIC PAYMENT (AUTOPAY)
City water and sewer customers can sign up to automatically pay their water and sewer bill in the
Automatic Pay program. Under the Automatic Pay program the customer's water bill payment is
automatically deducted from their bank checking account or charged to their credit card account
each month when the bill is due. Customers enrolled in the Automatic Pay program receive a
credit on their monthly bill.
WATER/SEWER AFFIDAVIT
Property owners who desire, pursuant to MCL 123.165, to avoid a tenant's unpaid water/sewer bill
from becoming a lien against the real estate, may execute an affidavit and file it with the City of
Muskegon Water/Sewer Billing Department, 933 Terrace Street, Muskegon, Ml 49440, together
with a deposit of an amount which may be established from time to time by the Muskegon City
Commission. A copy of the executed lease agreement must also be provided. The owner is
required to use the affidavit form provided by the City. The requirements and contents of the
affidavit are as follows:
1) The written lease with tenant; said lease must specifically provide that the tenant, not the
owner of the property, is directly responsible for all water and sewer bills associated with
the unit under lease to that tenant.
2) The affidavit must be filled in completely, accurately, signed and notarized. If it is not
correctly and completely filled out, signed and notarized, any benefits allowed pursuant
to MCL 123.165 will not be available to the property owner.
3) If there is more than one property owner or tenant; said affidavit must provide all
applicable names. All required data must provide for said affidavit to be valid and
enforceable.
4) The affidavit must contain the exact date upon which the tenant's written lease
terminates. If the lease is extended, the extension must be in writing and the new
termination date provided to the City with an affidavit containing the new information.
5) The required deposit must be paid at the time of submission of the affidavit to the City.
UTILITIES § 94-63
ARTICLE III. WATER SYSTEM* Sec. 94-63. Charges and costs for service
pipes and mains installed by city.
DIVISION 1. GENERALLY (a) If any property owner fails to make proper
connection with the water main before the paving
Sec. 94-61. Definitions. of a street is commenced, the city shall run the
stub line and a charge shall be made against the
The following words, terms and phrases, when property for the amounts set forth in the schedule
used in this article, shall have the meanings of fees and rates set forth in the resolution ad-
ascribed to them in this section, except where the opted by the city commission.
context clearly indicates a different meaning:
(b) Before water is turned on at any premises
Consumer means the person owning the prop- against which there may be a charge, all charges
erty in or upon which the water is consumed. lawfully made against the premises with interest,
Department means the city's department of if any, shall be paid in full. The city shall keep a
public utilities. record of all such accounts available and posted,
and a copy of such record shall be furnished to the
Director means the director of the department city director of finance. The city shall not tum
of public utilities. water on, nor permit water to be turned on or
used, at any premises in the city where accounts
Flat rate means the fixed charge for water and against the premises for water have not been fully
water service where no meter is used by the paid.
consumer.
(c) The city commission may determine, from
Service line and service pipe mean any line or time to time, whether to special assess a water
pipe leading from the property line to the build- main to benefit properties whether or not abut-
ing. ting the water main, or to charge connection fees
as set forth in this section.
Stub line and stub pipe mean the pipe leading
from the main to the property line. (d) Where the city performs or has performed
any one of the following, without charging abut-
System means the city's water system, also ting or benefitted properties a special assessment,
called works. a connection fee shall be charged:
(Code 1975, § 24-35; Code 2002, § 94-61)
(1) Installation of a main water line, where
Sec. 94-62. Rules and regulations of city com- no main water line has existed in the
mission and city manager. street where the new main is being in-
stalled;
The city commission may make such rules and
regulations governing the operation of the system (2) Installation of connections of stub lines to
and the collection of the service rates as it shall main water lines from a property which
deem necessary. The city manager may make has never been previously connected to a
such further bylaws, not inconsistent with the main water line in the street where the
rules and regulations of the city commission, as main is located;
he may deem necessary for the management and (3) A connection fee will be charged whenever
protection of the system. Such rules, regulations a meter is upgraded to a larger size.
and bylaws shall have the same force and effect as Credit for any previous connection fee
ordinances. paid will be given on the replaced larger
(Code 1975, § 24-36; Code 2002, § 94-62) size meter. Where a property changes to a
*State law reference--Local authority to provide and smaller size meter, no refund of connec-
regulate sewer and water service, MCL 324.430 I et seq. tion fees shall be made;
CD94:9
UTILITIES § 94-93
reasonable bans on water use for lawn sprinkling, Sec. 94-89. Basis of charges.
air conditioning, cooling and industrial use when,
in the opinion of the director, the use of this water The rates for services furnished by the system
will affect the health, safety and welfare of the shall be levied upon each lot or parcel of land,
citizens of the community. Such restriction shall building or premises within the corporate limits
also apply to any user of water or water service of the city having any connection with the system,
who is located outside of the corporate limits of on the basis of the quantity of water used thereon
the city. or therein as such quantity is measured by the
(Code 1975, § 24-45; Code 2002, § 94-67) city water meter there in use.
(Code 1975, § 24-53; Code 2002, § 94-89)
Secs. 94-68-94-85. Reserved. Sec. 94-90. Rates established.
The city commission may classify all users of
DIVISION 2. WATER USE CHARGES* water, and establish rates for such users, includ-
ing the establishment of rates for each fire hy-
drant or fire line publicly or privately owned and
Sec. 94-86. Meters required; flat rates pro- used only for such purposes, according to the
hibited on new service; remote quantity of water used and charge such rates to
reading devices. users of each class as it may deem advisable. Such
classes and rates shall be fixed and determined by
All new service added to the water distribution a schedule of rates and fees adopted by the city
system shall be metered with a remote reading commission by resolution.
device, and under no conditions shall flat rates be (Code 1975, § 24-54; Code 2002, § 94-90)
granted. Flat rates now in effect shall be discon-
tiirned and meters shall be installed by the con-
Sec. 94-91. Rates apply to each meter.
sumer when, in the opinion of the director, such
discontinuance of the flat rates shall be deemed Whenever more than one meter is required for
advisable. A remote reading device shall be in- a property owner or consumer, the rates pre-
stalled on all existing meters and shall be at- scribed by this division shall apply to each meter.
tached to the outside of the dwelling. (Code 1975, § 24-55; Code 2002, § 94-91)
(Code 1975, § 24-40; Code 2002, § 94-86)
Sec. 94-92. Additional charge for users out-
Sec. 94-87. Separate meter and service pipe side city.
for each house. Any user of water or water service who is
located outside of the corporate limits of the city,
No two residences shall be placed on one water who has a connection with the water supply
meter, nor shall the service pipe be rnn from one system of the city, shall pay for water or water
house to another but shall be run directly to the service such additional rate to that charged to
main adjacent to the premises served. users within the city as the city commission may,
(Code 1975, § 24-41; Code 2002, § 94-87) from time to time, determine by contract or oth-
erwise.
Sec. 94-88. Testing of meters. (Code 1975, § 24-56; Code 2002, § 94-92)
Procedures and requirements for testing of Sec. 94-93. Division of city into districts for
meters shall be established by regulations ad- billing purposes.
opted by the city commission.
For the purpose of reading water meters and
(Code 1975, § 24-42; Code 2002, § 94-88)
the collection of water bills, the city shall be
*State law reference-Liability of landlords for water divided into three approximately equal districts,
charges, MCL 141.121. which shall be delineated and become a part of
CD94:l 1
§ 94-93 MUSKEGON CITY CODE
the records of the department of public utilities. same as a turnoff in regards to tum-on fees. The
Any necessary changes in the districts shall be water will not again be turned on until a turn-on
made by the division of water and sewer billing, fee, as set by the city commission, and all other
with the approval of the city manager, with a charges against the premises, shall have been
letter to the involved property owners. paid.
(Code 1975, § 24-57; Code 2002, § 94-93) (Code 1975, § 24-62; Code 2002, § 94-98)
Sec. 94-99. Charges as lien; credit not ex-
Sec. 94-94. Adjustments of charges for me- tended.
ter inaccuracies. All water rates shall be chargeable to and
Procedures and requirements for adjustments payable by the owners of the property in or on
of water and sewer charges for meter inaccuracies which service is rendered, and such charges shall
shall be established by regulations adopted by the constitute a lien on the property served by such
city commission. connection, and, if not paid within 90 days, may
(Code 1975, § 24-58; Code 2002, § 94-94) be collected in the same manner as general city
' taxes. Credit for water or water service beyond
the regular billing period shall not be extended to
Sec. 94-95. Dete1111ining charges in case of any property owner or user.
meter failure. (Code 1975, § 24-63; Code 2002, § 94-99)
Procedures and requirements for determining State law reference-Liens for water charges, MCL
123.161 et seq.
charges in case of meter failure shall be estab-
lished by regulations adopted by the city. Sec. 94-100. Payment by city.
(Code 1975, § 24-59; Code 2002, § 94-95) The city shall pay, out of the appropriate gen-
eral funds of the city, the reasonable cost and
Sec. 94-96. When and where bills are due value of water furnished to the city by the system,
and payable. on the basis of the rates established by this
division and the amount of water used by the
All water bills for each water district in the city several departments of the city.
shall be due and payable at the city hall on the (Code 1975, § 24-64; Code 2002, § 94-100)
dates and on a schedule set forth in regulations
adopted by city commission resolution. Billing Sec. 94-10 I. No free service or use.
cycles may be determined for different types of No free service or use of the system, or service
users in accordance with reasonable standards. or use of the system at less than cost, shall be
(Code 1975, § 24-60; Code 2002, § 94-96) furnished by the system to any person, finn or
corporation, public or private, or to any public
Sec. 94-97. Charges for late payments. agency or instrumentality, including the city.
(Code 1975, § 24-66; Code 2002, § 94-101)
Charges for late payment shall be added to Secs. 94-102-94-13 0. Reserved.
delinquent bills and shall be determined by reso-
lution of the city commission.
(Code 1975, § 24-61; Code 2002, § 94-97) ARTICLE IV. SEWERSAND SEW AGE
DISPOSAL*
Sec. 94-98. Notice of and discontinuance of
service for delinquency.
DIVISION I. GENERALLY
Any water bill remaining unpaid for 15 days Sec. 94-131. Rules and regulations; gener-
after the due date shall be deemed delinquent, ally.
and the property owner shall be notified thereof.
The city commission may make such rules and
If the bill is not paid within ten days after the
regulations governing the operation of the sewer-
date of the notice, the water may be turned off, or
a reasonable effort will be made by the city to tum *State law reference-Local authority to provide and
off the water and such shall be considered the regulate sewer and water service, MCL 324.4301 et seq.
CD94:12
CITY OF MUSKEGON
Resolution No. 95-030 (d)
A resolution adopting administrative regulations for the
providing of water and sewer service.
The City Commission of the City of Muskegon hereby resolves:
1.0 Testing of Water Meters.
1.1 If any property owner or consumer shall desire to
have the water meter at his or her premises tested, a fee must
be deposited in the amount of thirty-five dollars ($35), or
such amount as the city commission may determine by subsequent
resolution, and the city shall thereupon cause the meter to be
tested. If such meter shall be found to be inaccurate, the
system shall refund the above deposit, or credit it toward an
under-charge adjustment, if all one exists as determined by
these regulations. If the meter so tested shall be found to
be accurate, such fee shall be retained by the city to cover
the expense of making the test.
1. 2 A water meter shall be deemed accurate if, when
subjected by the city to a standard test, its register
indicates a percentage of error not exceeding one (1%)
percent more or less than the actual quantity of water
passing through it. If its register indicates an error
in excess of one (1%) percent more than the actual
quantity of water passing through it, it shall be
considered fast to that extent. If its register
indicates less than ninety-five (95%) percent of the
actual water passing through it, it shall be deemed slow
to the extent it is under one hundred (100%) percent
correct.
1.3 The accuracy of a water meter shall be determined
using the standards set forth in the American Waterworks
Association Manual titled C-700-Cold Water Meter Standards,
which are incorporated herein and are determined by the City
Commission to constitute industry standards for water meters.
1. 4 Whenever the City makes a test of a water meter
voluntarily and not pursuant to a request of a property
owner or consumer, it shall be done without cost to the
property owner or consumer, other than the payment by him
or her of the amount due the City for water used, as
provided in these administrative regulations, if the
meter is found to be slow.
gtj\c-wt&sew.res
2.0 Meter Equipment Malfunction Adjustment. The purpose of
this regulation is to allow for adjustment of past billings
either over or under billed due to meter failure and to
alleviate the effect of catch up billings due to remote
register malfunctions. These regulations are intended to
ensure consistent and fair treatment of customers. It is
recognized, however, that not all circumstances can be covered
by these regulations and that the City at times may be
required to make adjustments outside the scope hereof. Such
adjustments may only be authorized by the City Manager or
Director of Finance.
Types of Adjustments
2.1 Meter malfunction where through testing a meter is
proved to be over or under registering and a customer has been
either over or under billed for usage.
2.2 Remote malfunction where the remote read device has
failed to register all the usage registered by the water
meter.
Rules
Main Meter Malfunction
2.3 If a meter tests fast (in excess of 101% accuracy)
the city shall credit the customer with a sum derived by
multiplying the amount of all water and sewer charges incurred
over the period in question preceding the test by the
percentage exceeding 100% (maximum six years).
2.4 If a meter tests slow (below 95% accuracy), the city
shall back bill the customer with a sum derived by multiplying
the amount of all water and sewer charges incurred over the
period in question preceding the test by the percentage below
100% (maximum six years).
EXAMPLE
Six years usage = 600; meter tests at 80% accuracy
Adjustment is equal to
(600 x 20% = adjusted usage x applicable rates in force during time in question)
Remote Read Device Malfunction
2.5 If a remote read device malfunctions, the city will
bill that service address for water and sewer use as metered
by the water meter.
gtj\c-wt&sew,res
- 2 -
2. 6 If ownership has changed during the affected period,
charges will be adjusted for the number of billing quarters
the current customer has resided at the service address. The
adjustment will be based on a comparison of previously billed
usage for the term of residency versus the 11 normal 11 usage (as
measured by periodic reads over a period of 1-2 quarters
following discovery of the malfunction).
2. 7 If ownership has not changed during affected period,
charges for water service will not be adjusted. However,
sewer charges will be relieved for any periods prior to 1993.
'Thie adjustment will be calculated by adding up total usage
over the period of occupancy up to six years. Then a total of
winter usage over the same period wi 11 be determined. The
difference between these two figures is the amount that will
be subject to adjustment and will be billed for sewer as if
these were winter quarters.
2 . 8 No adjustments will be allowed where there is
evidence that the remote read device was tampered with.
2. 9 Whenever meters fail to register consumption of
water used, through defects in such meters, the City may
charge the consumer such sum as shall be estimated by the
City, based on the consumption of water during the previous
year's billing quarters.
3.0 Charges for late payments.
3.1 Bills noL paid wiLHin 30 days after the due
date Lhereof shall be subject to a service charge equal
to ten (10%) percent of the billing. Tn the event a
delinquent bill must be spread on the taxes, for the
purpose of covering associated administrative costs, an
additional service charge equal to twenty (20%) percent
of the original delinquent billing amount shall be
charged.
4.0 Adjustment of bills for major leaks.
4.1 Residential Water/Sewer Leak Adjustment
Regulations
The purpose of these regulations is to promote water
conservation by encouraging customers to promptly fix leaks
and plumbing problems and to establish guidelines that provide
fair and consistent treatment of customers requesting leak
adjustments.
TYPES OF ADJUSTMENTS
4. 2 Adjustments for leaks where water was
discharged into the sanitary sewer system.
4. 3 Adjustments for leaks where water was not discharged
into the sanitary sewer system.
gtj\e-wt&sow.rea - 3 -
RULES
4. 4 No more than one leak adjustment will be
allowed in any two-year (24-month) period.
4.5 No more than two consecutive billing quarters
will be adjusted.
4.6 The request must be made within 30 days of the
due date for the quarter initially involved and must be
accompanied by the following:
4. 6 .1 A written statement from the customer
describing the nature of the problem, the date repairs
were completed, and copies of paid receipts for services
and/or supplies {where applicable).
4. 6. 2 Current readings {at the time of
request) from both the meter and remote device to be
furnished by customer.
4. 7 Leak adjustments will be based on metered usage
experience after repairs are made and will be made only
if usage is demonstrably reduced {after adjusting for any
extenuating circumstances).
4.8 If lost water entered the sanitary sewer
system, leak adjustments to the customer's water and
sewer bill will equal 25% of the estimated loss for no
more than two billing quarters.
4.9 If lost water did not enter the sanitary sewer
system (i.e. leaks in crawl space or into the ground)
water charges will be adjusted 25% of the estimated loss
for no more than two billing quarters and sewer charges
will be adjusted to normal usage based on prior year's
usage patterns.
4.10 If a leak is suspected but cannot be detected
by the occupant or owner, additional assistance may be
requested form the Water Maintenance Department at no
charge to the customer.
5.0 Shutoff Practice; amount delinquent to determine
shutoff.
5.1 While the city is authorized to shut off water
service for any delinquent bill, the city will normally shut
off water or sewer service if the charges to the premises or
the meter in question are delinquent in the amount of fifty
dollars ($50.I 00),
a or more. This amount and practice shall
vary, and the SJthreshold amount for shutoff may be changed by
decision of the City Manager, from time to time, to an amount
less or more than fifty dollars ($50.00). This decision shall
be made by the City Manager based on the administrative and
enforcement availability and capability of city personnel, and
the cost incurred by the city by using this method of
enforcement.
gtj\c-wt&eew.res - 4 -
6.0 Tenant Payment Affidavits.
6 .1 Affidavits filed with the City pursuant to MCL
123.165 shall include the date filed, the expiration date of
the lease, and have attached to them a fully executed, true
and exact copy of the lease, containing the required statutory
language requiring the tenant to pay the water and sewer
charges. The affidavit shall quote and refer to the language
in the lease, and contain a certification by the owner that
the lease is in full force and effect on the date of filing,
and further the statement, signed by the owner, that
notification of any change, cancellation, termination or
alteration of the lease shall be immediately communicated to
the City as required by statute.
6.2 Deposit. There shall be paid to the City, at the
time of filing such affidavit, the deposit required by the fee
and rate schedule currently in effect on the date the
affidavit is filed.
This resolution adopted.
Ayes: Commissioners Pruim, Jenkins, Pleimling, Aslakson,
Nielsen, Michalski and Smith.
Nays: None.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
·-
By \h ,QJU) J) 0, = r r c H
Theresa S. Malik-Kruel,
l k;- H-j _o
Clerk
CERTIFICATE
This resolution was adopted at a special meeting of the City
Commission, held on March 14, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. The meeting was
properly held and noticed pursuant to the Open Meetings Act of the
State of Michigan, Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1976.
CITY OF MUSKEGON
__ .
C0nQ k·t)A
,
0.
-
By \rUJJ\ 0 £U1 1 (, ._O
Theresa S. Malik-Krul:S el,
Clerk
gtj\c-wt&sew.res - 5 -
Agenda Item Review Form
Muskegon City Commission – Legislative Policy Committee
LPC Meeting Date: May 28, 2025 Title: Muskegon Social Equity Program
Submitted By: Mike Franzak Department: Planning
Brief Summary: Staff is asking the Committee to make suggestions on how to allocate the marihuana
excise tax money for the 2025-26 fiscal year. Staff is also asking for consideration of an amendment to
the existing MSEP grants/loan program that would allow applicants to be awarded grant funding up front,
rather than as a reimbursement. Staff would also like to reallocate $10,000 of appropriated MSEP funds
last year from a Fair Housing program that didn’t materialize.
Detailed Summary & Background: The City recently collected $698,744 from last year’s marihuana
excise tax sharing. Last year the City Commission allocated 25% of the excise tax towards the MSEP.
Assuming the Commission would like to allocate 25% again this year, it would put another $174,686 into
the MSEP. In April, the Commission allocated $29,013 towards waterfront wayfinding signage, which
leaves $145,673 in available funds. There have been several other requests for funding, which I have
outlined in the attachments.
Staff is also asking for consideration of an amendment to the existing MSEP grants/loan program that
would allow applicants to be awarded grant funding up front, rather than as a reimbursement.
Staff is also asking to reallocate $10,000 of appropriated MSEP funds last year from a Fair Housing
program that didn’t materialize.
Goal/Focus Area/Action Item Addressed: Economic Development
Amount Requested: N/A Budgeted Item: Yes
Fund(s) or Account(s): 101-701-801-002080 Budget Amendment Needed: Yes
Recommended Motion: Discussion only.
Approvals: Guest(s) Invited / Presenting:
MUSKEGON
SOCIAL
EQUITY
PROGRAM
EFFECTIVE: October 2024
The City of Muskegon is dedicated to giving back to the community. We are offering grant and loan
opportunities to those who have been affected by marihuana-related criminal charges in the past and need
help funding education, training, business expenses, marihuana facility equipment, and marihuana facility
licenses. We are also offering a façade grant program to commercial properties within one (1) mile of a
marihuana related business, to upgrade the look and function, by encouraging tenant businesses or building
owners to make exterior improvements. These improvements will enhance the individual property’s value;
and uplift the block in which the property is located.
Please complete the information below, select one of the following programs on pages 2-6, and complete the
information for that program. Completed application should be turned in to the Planning Department at City
Hall, 933 Terrace Street, Room 202, Muskegon, Michigan 49440, or email the application to:
planning@shorelinecity.com
Please include the following documents with your application
• For proof of residency:
o Driver’s License or State ID
• For proof of conviction (one of the following):
o Judgement of Sentence
o Order on Application to Set Aside Conviction, if expunged
o Other conviction documents (documents must include name and marihuana conviction)
• For the Marihuana License Grant, please provide proof of Michigan Social Equity Program approval
• For the Façade Grant please provide the following:
o Photos
o Project Plans
o Two Competitive Bids
Additional Information:
• Applicant is not eligible if they have any non-marihuana related felonies within the past 5 years
• Expenses may not be incurred before the application is approved
CONTACT INFORMATION
Applicant Name:
Address:
Phone Number: Email:
Signature: Date:
City of Muskegon Social Equity Program
Education/Training Scholarship
Eligibility: Applicants must have been a resident of the City of Muskegon at least 12 months out the past 48
months and have had a previous low-level marihuana conviction (or had a parent have a previous low-level
marihuana conviction while in school) to be eligible.
Applicants may receive up to $5,000 in educational scholarships for any type of career/industry. The
educational costs (i.e., tuition, job skills training) will be paid with grant funds upon completion of the
courses/training. Applicants attending a college or university must have filed a Free Application Federal
Student Aid and received eligible federal aid, this scholarship is intended to cover a portion of the balance.
The applicant must pass the course to be eligible for reimbursement.
Describe your previous low-level marihuana conviction (including date of conviction):
Name of College/University/Training Program:
Course/Training Title Credit Hours Cost of Tuition Begin Date End Date
Total Cost:
Amount of Federal Aid:
Total Cost after Federal Aid Applied:
City of Muskegon Social Equity Program
Marihuana Industry Training Scholarship
Eligibility: Applicants must meet at least one of the following criteria:
• You are a current resident of the City and have been a resident for at least five cumulative years.
• You are a current resident of the City and have had a misdemeanor conviction of a marihuana-
related offense (or had a parent have a previous low-level marihuana conviction while in school).
• You are a current resident of the City and you were registered as a caregiver under the MMMA for
at least two years.
Applicants may receive up to $5,000 in training toward a career in the marihuana industry. Institutions
providing courses will be vetted by City staff. Scholarships will either work as a reimbursement payment to
the applicant or will be paid directly to the institution to cover the cost of the training upfront.
If necessary, describe your previous low-level marihuana conviction (including date of conviction):
Name and Cost of Training Program:
City of Muskegon Social Equity Program
Business Start-Up Grant
Eligibility: Applicants must have had a previous low-level marihuana conviction (or had a parent have a
previous low-level marihuana conviction while in school) to be eligible.
Applicants may receive up to $5,000 in assistance towards hard costs (i.e., equipment, etc.), soft costs (i.e.,
business plan development, architecture fees, engineered drawings, formative business documents,
business training courses, etc.) or rental assistance associated with opening a business in the City. The grant
will be paid by reimbursement after the applicant provides receipt of payment for the related costs.
Describe your previous low-level marihuana conviction (including date of conviction):
Describe you proposed business (including proposed location):
Describe the soft costs associated with opening your proposed business for which you seek to be
reimbursed:
Item: Cost:
Total Cost:
City of Muskegon Social Equity Program
Business Start-Up Loan
Eligibility: Applicants must have been a resident of the City of Muskegon at least 12 months out of the past
48 months and have had a previous low-level marihuana conviction (or had a parent have a previous low-
level marihuana conviction while in school) to be eligible.
Applicants may receive interest-free gap loans up to $25,000 to supplement traditional financing with a
third party. All loans must be paid back within 60 months.
Describe your previous low-level marihuana conviction (including date of conviction):
Describe you proposed business (including proposed location):
Amount of Loan Requested (not to exceed $25,000):
Duration of Load Requested (not to exceed 60 months):
Describe the need for funding and how the loan will be used:
This loan must be used in conjunction with traditional financing. Describe what other methods of
financing are being used to fund the project.
City of Muskegon Social Equity Program
Marihuana License Grant
Eligibility: Applicants must have been a resident of the City of Muskegon for at least 12 months out of the
past 48 months and designated as a social equity applicant by the State of Michigan*.
Applicants may receive up to $10,000 in assistance for the fees associated with obtaining a local or state
marihuana license. For local application fees, a credit will be given to the applicant, waiving the $5,000
application fee (fee waived for the first year only). For State license fees, the grant will be paid by
reimbursement after the applicant provides receipt of payment for the State application fee.
*To be designated as a social equity applicant by the State of Michigan (application found at www.michigan.gov), an individual
must meet one of the following criteria:
• Residency – Residency in a disproportionately impacted community for at least 5 cumulative years.
• Marihuana Conviction – Conviction of a marihuana-related offense.
• Caregiver Status – Registration as a primary caregiver under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act.
Describe your previous low-level marihuana conviction (including date of conviction):
Describe you proposed business (including proposed location):
Grant Amount Requested (not to exceed $10,000):
Describe the need for funding and how the loan will be used:
City of Muskegon Social Equity Program
2024-2025 Building Façade Improvement Grant Guidelines
Goal:
To upgrade the look and function of commercial buildings within one mile of any City of Muskegon licensed
marihuana business by encouraging tenant businesses or building owners to make exterior improvements.
These improvements will enhance the individual property’s value; reduce blight, and beautify our commercial
corridors.
Available Funding:
Funding is provided by the Muskegon Social Equity Program (MSEP). The MSEP is funded through revenues
received from the Marihuana Retailers Excise Tax. Please note that funds are available on a rolling basis and are
not guaranteed. This program is first-come-first-serve and once funds are depleted grant applications will no
longer be accepted.
Terms:
The Building Façade Improvement Grants are for up to $10,000. This is a reimbursement-oriented program to
ensure that the proposed work is done appropriately and consistent with the character of the neighboring area.
Funds are available on a first-come-first-serve basis and must receive approval from the Planning Department
before any money is spent. Two competitive bids are required at the time of application.
Eligibility:
• Located within one mile of a City of Muskegon Marihuana Retailer
• The property must be either a commercial, industrial business or non-profit
• The property must be current on all taxes
• All required permits must be obtained (if necessary)
• All City regulations and ordinances must be followed
• A timeframe of all proposed work must be included at the time of application
City of Muskegon Social Equity Program
2024-2025 Building Façade Improvement Grant Application
Applicant Name: Business Address:
Email: Project Address:
Phone: Parcel Number:
Requested Amount: Total Façade Project Cost:
Statement of Intent/Need for Funding:
Description of Project (Attach: Photos, Project Plans, & Two Competitive Bids):
Project Timeline/Estimated Completion Date:
By signing the grant application, if awarded, the applicant commits to future property maintenance and
certifies the ability to fund the project to completion before grant fund reimbursements are made.
Applicant Signature & Date:
MSEP programs offered last year:
Program 2024 MSEP Results
Funding Received
(percentage of
MSEP funds)
Expungement Clinics $27,623 They City has worked with G.U.N.S. the past two years
by G.U.N.S. to provide three separate expungement clinics per
There was $17,377 year. The clinics have been very well attended and still
left over from very much requested, please see the attached
2023. The total information sheet that explains how many people they
program cost was have served.
$45,000.
Education/Harm $25,998 The City has worked with Mediation & Restorative
Reduction by Services the past two years to create a program that
Mediation & There was $14,002 focuses on educating the community about reducing
Restorative Services left over from cannabis consumption for youth while
Mediation & 2023. Total cost of underage. They share ways to talk with parents and
Restorative Services the program was youth, offer options for families to learn new coping
$40,000 skills and do outreach to schools and businesses. They
have been presenting and attending neighborhood
association meetings and vendor events. Through the
program, they have talked with over 4,000 youth,
parents and community members.
Business Grants $56,870 The program was adopted in late 2024, no applications
(façade have been received yet. It has been difficult to find
improvements) applicants due to the requirement that they must have
been negatively affected by prohibition. Staff is
requesting to remove this requirement.
Fair Housing/Public $56,870 $46,870 was spent to pave several residential alleys
Infrastructure around the marihuana districts. The MSEP has funding
over $85,000 worth of alley improvements over the
past two years. $10,000 was to be spent on
neighborhood grants through a Fair Housing program
that did not materialize. Staff recommends reallocating
these funds to the Grants/Loan program.
Grants/Loans $0. This money was eventually spent, mostly ($70,000) on
marihuana industry training with Higher Learning. Staff
There was $89,627 is recommending to separate Higher Learning’s request
left over from 2023 from the rest of these grants going forward.
funding.
Requests for MSEP funding this year:
Program 2025 Funding Explanation of Request
Request
Waterfront $29,013 Addition of wayfinding signage to the waterfront. This request
Wayfinding Signage was already been approved at an April Commission meeting.
Expungement Clinics $45,000 Provide an additional three expungement clinics that are free to
by G.U.N.S. Muskegon residents.
Education/Harm $35,000 Provide another year of services. This year they plan to add more
Reduction by parent groups especially those of younger
Mediation & children as they seem to find that parents of teens feel it is too
Restorative Services late. They are part of the current Livability Lab that is focusing on
reducing youth violence and are hoping to learn more from them
as well. They started having office hours the Community Resource
Center and at the Jayhawk Hub and would like to have consistent
hours at other locations around the City as well if they move
forward with this awareness and prevention programming. They
are requesting $5,000 less in funding than last year as some of
their overhead and supervisory costs have reduced. The grant
funding pays for a 20 hour per week staff position. If grant
funding was reduced, the staff hours would have to be reduced.
Marihuana Industry $70,000- They are requesting $70K to cover the cost of the course for 12
Training by Higher $150,000 individuals, similar to last year but will be adding free webinars
Learning for the community and one seminar. If they receive between
$80K and $150K in funding from MSEP, they plan to expand their
efforts. This will increase the number of students able to take the
course and allow them to roll out their Educational Resource
Summit. They would also hold three in-person seminars, a
portion of their grab and grow courses will be free for a limited
number of Muskegon residents, and educational events focusing
on safety. Additionally, the extra funds will support finishing
renovations at 1714 E Apple, purchasing equipment, obtaining
necessary licenses, and enhancing their marketing efforts by
using it as leverage to increase the amount they can get from
their lenders.
Water Fund $330,000 The City is in the planning phase of a city-wide water affordability
Assistance program with the goals of reducing the financial burden of the
utility billing on lower income customers and reducing the
number of non-payment related water shutoffs. The City’s pilot
Water Affordability Program will serve a small number of low-
income City water customers by lowering their monthly water bill
to an affordable cost for their household. With sufficient funding,
a monthly bill credit will be based on income and potentially
household size. At current water rates this is estimated as a $7
monthly bill credit per person in the household. The requested
amount for the pilot program will serve approximately 700
households, all of whom live in the City.
Existing programs with remaining funding:
Program Amount Comments
Business Grants (façade $56,870 Staff are requesting to remove the requirement that
improvements) the applicant must have been negatively affected by
prohibition. There are several businesses interested
in the program but do not qualify.
Grants/Loans $5,000 ($15,000 if The Grants/Loans category includes marihuana
we reallocate the industry training grants, college grants, business
Fair Housing grant) start-up grants/loans, and marihuana license grants.
Most of the $89,627 remaining from 2023 funding
was awarded to Higher Learning ($70,000) in 2024.
Other than the marihuana industry training
component, there is less demand for these grants
from when the marihuana industry first started.
Staff is recommending to separate the funding for
Higher Learning from the Grants/Loans program and
award them their own funding.
Fair Housing $10,000 Staff recommends reallocating these funds to the
Grants/Loan program.
Staff Recommendation for 2025 funding:
Program Amount
Waterfront Signs (already allocated) $29,013
G.U.N.S. $45,000
Mediation & Restorative Services $35,000
Higher Learning $55,673
Total $174,686
888 Terrace St. Suite 200A Muskegon, MI 49440
(231) 727-6001 www.mediatewestmichigan.com
May 14, 2025
Please describe your program in detail. If it is an existing program, describe any changes from the previous year.
Our program focuses on educating the community more about reducing cannabis consumption for youth while
underage. We share ways to talk with parents and youth, we offer options for families to learn new coping skills and
we outreach to schools and businesses as well. We have been presenting and attending neighborhood association
meetings and any vendor events we hear about both at the schools around the City and at community events too.
Changes we will offer with ongoing funding include reaching out to more parent groups especially those of younger
children as we seem to find that parents of teens feel "it is too late". We are part of the current Livability Lab that is
focusing on reducing youth violence and are hoping to learn more from them as well. The thing we won't change is
being active in the community we are getting more and more people finally feeling comfortable talking to us and that
is directly related to seeing our coordinator's face at so many events. We started having "office hours" at both the
Community Resource Center and at the Jayhawk Hub and we would like to have consistent hours at other locations
around the City as well if we move forward with this awareness and prevention programming. Additionally, we have
had increase interest in youth wanting to talk with/mentor other youth and we think having their voice being more
involved will be an area we can reach more youth with!
How many people will benefit from this program? Are they Muskegon residents?
Our program is designed to work with City of Muskegon residents as well as those attending school or working here.
Occasionally we do some outreach in the neighboring schools as we know many kids move back and forth between
districts but our main area is the schools in the City. At last count we talked with over 4,000 youth, parents or
community members about these services and with continued funding we should be able to meet or exceed that
number again.
How much funding are you requesting from the MSEP? Are there other funding sources contributing to the
program? If so, what percentage?
For M&RS to continue this half time position providing education, support, prevention and intervention services to
families, schools and community organizations in the City of Muskegon, we request $35,000. This is $5,000 less that
we received for the last 12 months as some of our overhead and supervisory costs have reduced. We also have a
little roll over money that will be left over after June 30, 2025. If the City is not able to fund this program, there will
be no services doing this specific work as there is not another grant to cover the 20 hour position. If you want to
continue this program but are not able to fund at $35,000, we would need to limit the hours a week or months out of
the year we can offer this youth prevention programming.
Will this program assist any of the following people: Those that were negatively affected by marihuana
prohibition, those seeking employment in the marihuana industry, or residents that live near a marihuana retailer?
The majority of our time in this program is assisting those that live near a marihuana retailer. We also have and will
continue to outreach to parents and community members that have been negatively affected by marihuana
prohibition and those that are seeking employment in the marihuana industry.
Serving Muskegon, Oceana, Mason & Manistee Counties
Higher Learning Institutions is a vocational training program focused on the cannabis industry,
offering comprehensive courses in cultivation, processing, retail, compliance, and business
management. In two years, we have successfully partnered with Muskegon, training over 20
graduates, with 60% employed in the industry and 20% pursuing ownership. Our website,
www.yourhigherlearning.com, provides information on courses, graduate testimonials, and resources
for prospective students. We remain dedicated to expanding our impact and supporting individuals in
building careers and businesses in the cannabis sector. Our biggest change is that we are looking to
have a brick and mortar location in the city.
This year with our program we are looking to benefit approximately 500 people, and yes, they are
Muskegon residents.
We are requesting $70,000-$150,000 in funding from the MSEP. Additionally, we are in the process of
securing funding from other sources, including private investors, government grants, and cannabis
companies social equity grants. Muskegon will contributing to 7%-15% of the program's total budget.
This program was created to assist all three groups of people, those negatively affected by marijuana prohibition, such
as those with criminal records related to marijuana offenses. Those seeking employment in the marijuana industry by
providing training, job placement assistance, or entrepreneurial support for individuals seeking employment or
business opportunities within the marijuana industry. Also residents living near a marijuana retailer by addressing
community impact, safety, or regulations related to marijuana retail establishments via free seminars and webinars.
Muskegon Social Equity Program (MSEP)
Request for Funding Form
1. Please describe your program in detail. If it is an existing program, describe any changes from
the previous year.
According to Safe & Just Clean Slate program Expungements change lives by making good jobs
and affordable housing easier for justice-impacted families to find. Until Michigan’s Clean Slate
laws took effect in 2021, getting criminal records expunged was expensive, confusing, and most
people with convictions were not eligible. Automatic Expungement, which took effect in 2023,
has sealed over 1 million people’s old convictions without requiring them to apply. However there
is still a large demand for applicants to apply for manual set aside convictions.
This is where G.U.N.S. have been able to help change lives by assisting individuals with the second
chance manual application process . We do the initial screening by pulling a copy of an applicant
ICHAT to see if they are eligible to get convictions off their record, we notify applicants if they are
eligible, partially eligible , not eligible or if they have a blank ICHAT. Those that are eligible
attorneys fill out necessary applications, notaries notarize application , fingerprint cards are
completely filled out and self addressed envelopes are provided for prosecutor office , attorney
general and Michigan State Police. Then applicants are directed to the court of conviction for
certified records and obtain a court hearing date.
This process has become more involved from previous expungements and previous clinics
agreements , because we found that applicants still needed assistance with making copies,
requesting certified records from Muskegon courts, organizing the documents together for the
appropriate office , verifying court hearing scheduled with dates and signature proof of service ,
along with providing an motion order for the judge to sign at the court hearing. With that insight
we have done follow up mini clinics as requested by applicants , and courts to fill in that gap for
applicants . That was not part of the initial agreement or second year proposal , but a significant
change for GUNS clinic and other clinics that people may have attended to previously elsewhere.
2. How many people will benefit from this program? Are they Muskegon residents?
608 people was screened in the Muskegon county area and have benefited from the previous
supported expungement clinic with the demand for more. I think over 1,000 people can be easily
reached with continuous support.
Out of six clinics the lowest number of eligible applicants was 44% with the highest percentage
being 63%, totaling 51% (312) of Muskegon county residence being eligible for expungement from
the previous supported expungement clinics. 124 Muskegon residents received additional
support from county commissioners for applicant fees and postage.
I think that percentage can increase another 20% to 30% with the momentum of word of mouth,
courts support , volunteers and those who are now eligible to come back from previous clinics.
3. How much funding are you requesting from the MSEP? Are there other funding sources
contributing to the program? If so, what percentage?
The $15,000 per each of the 3 clinics have helped to provide an appropriate venue , t-shirts, meals
for volunteers, along with a stipend for helping with the process , treats for attendees, necessary
supplies, certified records, and processing fees for Muskegon residence. No other funding sources
have contributed to this program , but agencies resources tables have supported the clinics by
being on hand to share housing , employment and other great opportunities for betterment once
records are cleared. Funding has been sought after to help with processing fees of non residence
of Muskegon, but have not been successful in obtaining. However collaboration between
Muskegon and GUNS has been very successful, and we welcome the opportunity to expand on
the program with the before mentioned services that were not a part of the previous agreements
, and funding allows. Additionally would love the opportunity to follow up with applicants to see
their outcome of the set side convictions success rate . To have additional $3,000 to $5,000
funded would allow for that follow through and an overall community get together to share the
successes of how life has changed because of the help from Muskegon and GUNS.
4. Will this program assist any of the following people: Those that were negatively affected by
marihuana prohibition, those seeking employment in the marihuana industry, or residents that
live near a marihuana retailer?
This program will benefit those negatively impacted with the prohibition of marijuana who was
jailed or imprisoned for marijuana convictions in the past , allowing them to have a fresh start
with employment opportunities, housing , and allowing more law abiding citizens that can be
active in our schools, youth activities and family self sufficiency. In fact with additional funding we
could offer community hours , employment that could help fill in the gaps of city /school needs
with clean up, mentoring , classroom support or neighborhood revitalization innovative ideas.
Never know those who once found themselves on the wrong side of the law could now find
themselves experiencing life altering careers that they may not have ever considered.
Muskegon Social Equity Program (MSEP)
Request for Funding Form
1. Please describe your program in detail. If it is an existing program, describe any changes from
the previous year.
The City of Muskegon is in the planning phase of a city-wide water affordability program with
the goals of reducing the financial burden of the utility billing on lower income customers and
reducing the number of non-payment related water shutoffs. The City of Muskegon’s pilot
Water Affordability Program will serve a small number of low-income City water customers by
lowering their monthly water bill to an affordable cost for their household. With sufficient
funding, a monthly bill credit will be based on income and potentially household size. At current
water rates this is estimated as a $7 monthly bill credit per person in the household.
The City will also partner with existing organizations (Michigan Department of Health and
Human Services, Community & Neighborhood Services, Mid-Michigan Community Action) that
can assist in water affordability by providing water bill arrearage payments and plumbing repair.
These organizations will also connect City residents to other assistance available to low-income
households to provide a well-rounded approach to affordability.
2. How many people will benefit from this program? Are they Muskegon residents?
At current water rates, data shows water customers living at income levels at or below 130%
Federal Poverty Level (FPL) may be experiencing unaffordable water bills. Current census data
estimates approximately 4,000 households in the City of Muskegon could be living within 130%
FPL. On average, the City is seeing 1,500 households behind on water bill payment. As water
rates are expected to increase, more households may be affected by unaffordable water bills in
the future. The requested amount for the pilot program will serve approximately 700
households, all of whom live in the City.
3. How much funding are you requesting from the MSEP? Are there other funding sources
contributing to the program? If so, what percentage?
$330,000 is requested from the MSEP to get the monthly bill credit portion of the pilot program
started. To provide the $7 monthly bill credit per person in the household for 1,500 households,
$330,000 is the estimated total funding required. The first year of the program will determine
actual funding needs as the City observes how many residents apply to the program.
We are researching grants available through Community Foundation and have been told there
may be potential for a $35,000 grant, but not until a later funding cycle (next fiscal year).
The program will partner with available state and federal funding distributed through Michigan
Department of Health and Human Services, Community & Neighborhood Services, and Mid-
Michigan Community Action for bill arrearage and plumbing repair. Funding amounts available
to City residents through these organizations have not been disclosed and are not intended to
be diverted to this program.
4. Will this program assist any of the following people: Those that were negatively affected by
marihuana prohibition, those seeking employment in the marihuana industry, or residents
that live near a marihuana retailer?
Yes. Any City residents that were negatively affected by marihuana prohibition, are seeking
employment in the marihuana industry, or live near a marihuana retailer would by definition
also be water customers and would be eligible for assistance if the affordability program income
requirements are met.
State / Federal Report, May 2025
Bill # Detail Status
HR 19 Immigration / restriction on state earmark funding – sets House Rules, not statute Adopted by House
HB 4001 Tipped wage Senate Reg Affairs
HB 4049-50 Allows rearing of hen chickens in residential areas. Provides generally accepted agricultural and management House Committee on
practices for rearing egg-laying hens in residential areas under certain conditions. The legislation would appear Agriculture
to restrict our ordinance to only single-family properties, parcels of at least 1/4 in size, and hens not to exceed
(5).
HB 4081 Amends the Land Division Act to authorize counties/municipalities to increase number of parcels resulting from Senate Local Gov
division for the first 10 acres of a parent parcel from four to ten.
HB 4170 Income Tax cut to 4.05% Senate Finance
HB 4230, 4180- House GOP road funding proposal; 4187 dedicates $95M to hold locals harmless from reduced Const Rev Senate Appropriations
85; 4187 Sharing
HB 4260-61 Public Safety Trust Fund Senate Appropriations
HB 4311-12 Revenue Sharing Trust House Gov Ops
HB 4410 Modifies definition of abandoned property to allow a local unit to secure the property to prevent trespass. House Gov Operations
SB 8 Minimum Hourly Wage Signed by Gov
SB 19-22 Tenant Empowerment Package for renters Senate Housing & Human
Services
SB 108 / HB 4209 Modifies certain requirements for initial assessed value for DDAs.
SB 278 Modifies the housing and community development fund program. Reintroduction of SB 293 from last session Senate Housing & Human
that MML supported. MSHDA administers the program for the purpose of making financing available to meet Services
1
the housing needs of low-income, very-low-income, and extremely-low-income households and to finance
projects in a downtown area or adjacent neighborhood in the State. The bill would expand the Program's scope
by making its financing available to middle-income households (not more than 120% AMI) and deleting the
requirement that financed projects be in a downtown area or adjacent neighborhood.
2
LOCAL
ARPA Community Grants, as of 4/1/25
- 25 - total approved grants ($1.6M)
- 13 - projects paid the entirety of their grant (Samaritas, Unity Beauty Salon, Tiki Boiz, Rake Beer Projects,
Forrest Tax, Soul Filled Enterprises, Jackson Hill NA, McLaughlin NA, West Michigan Symphony, Kids Food
Basket, Muskegon Retirement Apts dba Jefferson Towers, Mount Zion Church, Boys and Girls Club)
- 6 - have been paid the first installment payment, ie. 50% of the total award
- 5 - have been paid the second installment payment, ie. 40% of the total award
- 1 – pending their final installment payment, ie 10% of the total award
- As of 4/1/25 - $1,394,800 spent – 87% spent of the total $1.6M
Climate Action
- Fresh Coast Climate Solutions, LLC has finalized our Government Operations Climate Action Plan (CAP).
The CAP is expected to presented at the May 28 LPC meeting and June 10tcommission meeting. An EGLE
Community Energy Management Grant was received to offset the development of the CAP.
- U.S. Dept of Energy, Energy Efficiency Community Block Grant (EECBG) – City was approved to receive a
$76,500 block grant towards the acquisition of two EV side-by-side vehicles for use by the Parks Dept.
Inquiries to USDOE for cost reimbursement are ongoing.
MEDC RAP 1.0 grant ($6M)
- Funds remaining from the MEDC Revitalization and Placemaking (RAP) 1.0 grant continue to be spent
down from the original $6M award. Approximately $2.5M remains dedicated to the LakeView Lofts II
project as well as $167,500 for the redevelopment of the 880 First St site.
MEDC RAP 3.0 grant (2025 application) - Robert C. Lighton Memorial Park Improvements
- The city applied for the third round of the MEDC RAP 3.0 grant program. Funds were sought to
reactivate this public space by attracting more people and stimulating needed economic activity
in the vicinity of the Laketon-Lakeshore Trail Connector non-motorized pathway project.
Unfortunately, the application was not selected for further consideration. However, the
documents prepared can be utilized for future use regarding the Connector project.
STATE
State of Michigan – Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference – 5/14/25
On May 14th, the State Treasurer, Senate Fiscal Agency Director, and House Fiscal Agency Director
reached consensus on revised economic and revenue figures for the remainder of Fiscal Year (FY) 2025
and the upcoming 2026 and 2027 fiscal years.
3
The May Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference’s detailed forecast – as well as presentations from
today’s session – can be found at www.michigan.gov/crec.
The state’s economy remains strong though just not as strong as projected in January, yielding state
revenues that are slightly down from five months ago when an extra $1.7 billion was estimated to come
in this year and next. New federal tariffs and federal budget cuts could cause job losses and economic
harm, but the level of certainty remains unknown.
Projected revenue for the General Fund and the School Aid Fund is $136 million lower than January’s
projections for the current Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 and $320.2 million less than FY 2026, which begins Oct.
1. The state Treasury is seeing retirees and lower-income workers claim more income tax exemptions, as
expected. That’s a result of the 2023 Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) rate increase and the expanded
retiree income tax exemptions in what is referred to as the pension tax repeal.
Senate Passes Budget That's $1.1B More Than Governor's – 5/14/25
Senate Democrats have passed a more than $85.95B FY26 state budget.
- Includes grants to offset any business losses from the President’s tariff policy
- $10,008 per-pupil school allowances that must contribute to teacher raises.
- $3B for a long-term road funding plan
- $30 million to fund a Caregiver Tax Credit.
- 10% increase in statutory revenue sharing.
Transportation Funding Plans
There are competing road funding plans by both the House and Senate -
- Each plan would rely on either existing revenue versus new revenue
- Neither disagrees on the amount needed ($3B).
- Both agree that all fuel taxes should support roads.
- More should be sent to local units.
Current gas tax revenue distribution –
- State gas tax: 31 cents per gallon
- Federal gas tax: 18.4 cents per gallon
- State sales tax: 21 cents per gallon
Under the current model for taxing fuel, the wholesale cost is $2.38 per gallon with an 18.4-cent
federal tax, a 31-cent state fuel tax and an average of a 14-cent state sales tax.
House Passed $3.1 Billion Transportation Proposal – 3/19/25
- Nine bills that would utilize $3.1B in existing state resources to improve the state’s
transportation system.
4
o It would provide over $3 billion annually in transportation funding, removed sales tax
currently being charged on motor fuel, and eliminated funding for SOAR ($500M),
Revitalization and Placemaking grants ($50M), and the Housing and Community
Development Fund ($50M), among other reductions to fund the proposal.
o By not charging sales tax on motor fuel, the school aid fund would be reduced by
approximately $700M, and constitutional revenue sharing would be reduced by
approximately $95M. (roughly half goes to cities and villages). Schools and local units will
be held harmless.
o The $3.1 billion in this proposal is derived in two ways. First, a 20-cent increase in fuel tax.
This generates approximately $1 billion and results in the price of gas being the same
because of the removal of sales tax. Second, $2.2 billion in revenue from the Corporate
Income Tax (CIT) will be dedicated to roads, with corresponding reductions to other areas
of the budget. The new fuel tax revenue will flow through Act 51. The CIT revenue would
have been distributed in the following manner, 50% to the counties, 40% to cities and
villages, and 10% to MDOT. This proposal does not include any new revenue and only
reprioritizes existing state revenue.
o Funding for neighborhood roads and local bridges is included along with funds to hold
local units harmless from reductions in constitutional revenue sharing.
o Advocacy efforts are ongoing to ensure any budget cuts to fund this transportation plan
do not come from statutory revenue sharing. Under the House plan, the City of Muskegon
would receive $15.5M.
Senate version – May 2025
- The Senate released details on authorizing $3B in contingency spending if a long-term road
funding plan were to be negotiated with the House.
- Funds include support for local roads and state trunkline needs, local bus and transit services,
funding for passenger and freight rail services and for critical infrastructure including bridges,
non-motorized infrastructure, and emergency and disaster response needs.
- Their plan would include a revised road funding distribution formula that would account for the
lane miles of local roads and prioritizes local roads that are in poor condition and have high
traffic volume.
Governor’s version -
- $4.9B billion in total road funding, including federal, state and restricted funds.
o $112.2M in GF dollars to ensure Michigan matches all $1.8 billion in federal highway aid
o $98.9M million in new revenue to improve state and local roads, highways, and bridges
across the state
o $767M for transit and rail programs
o $7.8M to fund a study and pilot program of potential road usage charge options
o $10M to install electric vehicle charging stations across the state
- This proposal only includes new revenue generated from an increase in collections from gas tax
and registration fees based on an upcoming transportation funding proposal from the Governor.
5
Public Safety Trust Fund
House version
- Uses $115M of existing state sales tax revenue to create the fund.
- $72M CVT’s based on their share of statewide violent crime. The plan requires local governments
to use the resources to increase support for public safety and violence intervention efforts.
- $40 million for county sheriff’s offices, distributed according to the size of each county’s police
force.
- $1.5M to the Crime Victim’s Rights Fund to support victims and their families.
- $1.5M grants for community violence intervention initiatives.
Senate version
- A new $100M Community Crime Reduction Initiative is recommended.
- $60M to counties and $40M to CVT’s
- This is quite different than the Public Safety Trust Fund, and would results in less proposed
funding.
This issue will be negotiated as part of the state budget development process.
Housing
- MML’s one pager identifying cost drivers that are impacting our ability to build attainable
housing.
- MML is working towards a solution where the state provides resources to communities that
make proactive changes to zoning, while reducing the bureaucratic barriers to receiving those
funds.
- The incentive-based approach is a more reasonable and strategic solution to push back against
local preemption that does not lead to building and rehabbing more homes.
MI State House – Legislative Directed Spending request April 2025
- A $500,000 Legislative Directed Spending (LDS) application request was sent to Rep. Snyder for
assistance to help improve beach safety at Pere Marquette Park.
- LDS funds would be used for the addition of a beach safety warning and forecasting system that
would provide park-wide visibility notifying swimmers of dangers, ensure first responders are
deployed swiftly, and critical safety equipment is made available.
- The current system is a smaller SwimSmart system that ties into NOAA forecasts. The light
system illuminates red, yellow or green depending on the current water conditions.
- These funds would help to expand the reach and use of this safety equipment across the beach.
6
FEDERAL
EECBG –
- We remain in contact with the U.S. Department of Energy on our $76,500 Energy Efficiency
Community Block grant reimbursement request.
- The city was approved for funding and the request for reimbursement (two EV utility vehicles)
was submitted in late December.
U.S. Senator Slotkin – Congressional Directed Spending request – April 2025
- Sen. Slotkin’s office solicit project proposals as part of their Congressional Directed Spending
process.
- In late April, we submitted a request to help fund much need equipment for our law
enforcement personnel.
- The request was for $900,000 to procure (80) upgraded Motorola/WatchGuard Body Worn
Cameras, (33) upgraded Taser devices, and (25) In-Car Video Systems for our marked police
vehicles.
- The equipment will provide the community with increased transparency while officers are on
shift, modernize and offer quality communications equipment, and provide alternative subject
control methods that would protect the public and our first responders.
- To date, we have not received confirmation from the Senator’s office whether it will be a project
she advances for recommended funding.
7
Agenda Item Review Form
Muskegon City Commission – Legislative Policy Committee
LPC Meeting Date: 5/28/25 Title: Dir, Gov Relations & Strategic Ops
Submitted By: Peter Wills Department: Manager’s Office
Brief Summary: Staff is seeking adoption of a city-specific Support Emergency Operations Plan which
describes how the City of Muskegon will handle emergency situations in cooperation with the County of
Muskegon and Michigan State Emergency Management agencies. The scope of the Support EOP is
limited to severe weather events, as other areas of emergency management responsibility will remain
with the County of Muskegon’s Emergency Manager.
Detailed Summary & Background:
Officials of the City of Muskegon, in conjunction with the County of Muskegon and Michigan State
Emergency Management (EM) agencies, have developed this Support Emergency Operations Plan that
will enhance the local emergency response capability.
The Support EOP assigns responsibilities to agencies for coordinating emergency response activities
before, during, and after any type of emergency or disaster. The Support EOP does not contain specific
instructions as to how each department will respond to an emergency; these can be found in the plan
annexes.
The goal of the Support EOP is to coordinate emergency response efforts to save lives, reduce injuries,
and preserve property. The Support EOP’s primary goals are to assemble, mobilize and coordinate a
team of responders that can respond to any emergency, and describe response procedures in relation to
the county response procedures.
This plan, when used properly and updated, will assist local government officials to accomplish their
primary responsibilities of protecting lives and property in their community.
Goal/Focus Area/Action Item Addressed: 2027 Goal 1: Destination Comm & Quality of Life
Amount Requested: NA Budgeted Item: NA
Fund(s) or Account(s): NA Budget Amendment Needed: NA
Recommended Motion: Discussion only.
Approvals: Guest(s) Invited / Presenting:
Sign up for City of Muskegon Emails